Adverse Effects of First-Line Pharmacologic Treatments of Major

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Adverse Effects of First-Line Pharmacologic Treatments of Major Appendix Table of Contents Appendix A. Search Strategy A-1 Appendix B. List of excluded studies B-1 Appendix C. Evidence tables C-1 Appendix D. Risk of bias assessment D-1 Appendix E. Strenght of evidence assessments E-1 Appendix F. Forest plots F-1 Tables Table 1. Study and population characteristics, randomized controlled trials ................................ C-1 Table 2. Study and population characteristics-observational studies ............................................ C-8 Table 3. Study level outcomes ....................................................................................................... C-9 Table 4. Risk of bias assessment.................................................................................................... D-1 Table 5. Risk of bias assessment- observational studies................................................................ D-3 Table 6. Strength of evidence ratings for the comparison of SSRI versus placebo ........................ E-1 Table 7. Strength of evidence ratings for the comparison of SSRI versus TCA ............................ E-3 Table 8. Strength of evidence ratings for the comparison of SSRI versus SSRI ............................ E-4 Table 9. Strength of evidence ratings for the comparison of SNRI versus placebo ....................... E-5 Table 10. Strength of evidence ratings for the comparison of SNRI versus SSRI ......................... E-7 Table 11. Strength of evidence ratings for the comparison of bupropion XR versus placebo ....... E-8 Table 12. Strength of evidence ratings for the comparison of mirtazapine versus no antidepressant use ................................................................................................................................................... E-9 Table 13. Strength of evidence ratings for the comparison of mirtazapine versus paroxetine ..... E-10 Table 14. Strength of evidence ratings for the comparison of trazodone versus no antidepressant use ................................................................................................................................................. E-11 Table 15. Strength of evidence ratings for the comparison of vortioxetine versus placebo ......... E-12 Table 16. Strength of evidence ratings for the comparison of vortioxetine versus duloxetine .... E-13 Figures Figure 1. SSRI vs. placebo on any adverse event, acute treatment ................................................ F-1 Figure 2. SNRI vs. placebo on sustained elevated supine diastolic blood pressure, acute treatment ......................................................................................................................................................... F-1 Figure 3. SNRI vs. placebo on standing diastolic blood pressure, acute treatment ........................ F-1 Figure 4. SNRI vs. placebo on standing systolic blood pressure, acute treatment ......................... F-2 Figure 5. SNRI vs. placebo on supine diastolic blood pressure, acute treatment ........................... F-2 Figure 6. SNRI vs. placebo on supine systolic blood pressure, acute treatment ............................ F-2 Figure 7. SNRI vs. placebo on orthostatic hypotension, acute treatment ....................................... F-2 Figure 8. SNRI vs. placebo on orthostatic diastolic blood pressure, acute treatment..................... F-3 Figure 9. SNRI vs. placebo on orthostatic systolic blood pressure, acute treatment ...................... F-3 Figure 10. SNRI vs. placebo on SDST score, acute treatment ....................................................... F-3 Figure 11. SNRI vs. placebo on 2DCT score, acute treatment ....................................................... F-3 Figure 12. SNRI vs. placebo on falls, acute treatment .................................................................... F-4 Figure 13. SNRI vs. placebo on weight loss 7% or greater ............................................................ F-4 Appendix A. Search Strategy Search for KQ 1 and 2- Medline, Cochrane Central, PsychInfo and Embase all via OVID 1. major depression.mp. or major Depression/ 2. major depressive.mp. 3. 1 or 2 4. elderly.mp. or Aged/ 5. "Aged, 80 and over"/ or late-life.mp. 6. later-life.mp. 7. older.mp. 8. geriatric.mp. 9. 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 10. (anti-depressant or antidepressant).mp 11. Antidepressant Agents/ 12. paroxetine.mp. or Paroxetine/ 13. sertraline.mp. or Sertraline/ 14. citalopram.mp. or Citalopram/ 15. escitalopram.mp. 16. fluoxetine.mp. or Fluoxetine/ 17. fluvoxamine.mp. or Fluvoxamine/ 18. selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.mp. or Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors/ 19. venlafaxine.mp. or Venlafaxine Hydrochloride/ 20. desvenlafaxine.mp. or Desvenlafaxine Succinate/ 21. duloxetine.mp. or Duloxetine Hydrochloride/ 22. serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor.mp. 23. bupropion.mp. or Bupropion/ 24. mirtazapine.mp. 25. trazodone.mp. or Trazodone/ 26. vilazodone.mp. or Vilazodone Hydrochloride/ 27. vortioxetine.mp. 28. milnacipran.mp. 29. levomilnacipran.mp. 30. Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors/ 31. 10 or 11 or 12 or 13 or 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 or 22 or 23 or 24 or 25 or 26 or 27 or 28 or 29 or 30 32. 3 and 9 and 31 33. Epidemiologic studies/ 34. exp cohort studies/ 35. exp case controlled studies/ 36. Case control.tw. 37. (cohort adj (study or studies)).tw. 38. Cohort analy$.tw. 39. (Follow up adj (study or studies)).tw. 40. (observational adj (study or studies)).tw. 41. Longitudinal.tw. A-1 42. Retrospective.tw. 43. Cross sectional.tw. 44. Cross-sectional studies/ 45. or/33-44 46. Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/ 47. randomized controlled trial/ 48. Random Allocation/ 49. Double Blind Method/ 50. Single Blind Method/ 51. clinical trial/ 52. clinical trial, phase i.pt. 53. clinical trial, phase ii.pt. 54. clinical trial, phase iii.pt. 55. clinical trial, phase iv.pt. 56. controlled clinical trial.pt. 57. randomized controlled trial.pt. 58. multicenter study.pt. 59. clinical trial.pt. 60. exp Clinical Trials as topic/ 61. or/46-60 62. (clinical adj trial$).tw. 63. ((singl$ or doubl$ or treb$ or tripl$) adj (blind$3 or mask$3)).tw. 64. PLACEBOS/ 65. placebo$.tw. 66. randomly allocated.tw. 67. (allocated adj2 random$).tw. 68. or/62-67 69. 61 or 68 70. case report.tw. 71. letter/ 72. historical article/ 73. or/70-72 74. 69 not 73 75. 45 or 74 76. 75 and 32 A-2 Appendix B. List of excluded studies 1.A double-blind multi-centre trial of fluoxetine 8.Altamura AC, Mauri MC, Colacurcio F, et al. and dothiepin in major depressive illness. Trazodone in late life depressive states: a South Wales Antidepressant Drug Trial double-blind multicenter study versus Group. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. amitriptyline and mianserin. 1988;3(1):75-81. PMID: 3282004 [Not in Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1988;95 older adults] Suppl:S34-6. PMID: 3133712 [Not in older 2.Ackerman DL, Greenland S, Bystritsky A, et adults] al. Characteristics of fluoxetine versus placebo 9.Altamura AC, Mauri MC, Colacurcio F, et al. responders in a randomized trial of geriatric Trazodone in late life depressive states: A depression. Psychopharmacol Bull. double-blind muticenter study versus 1997;33(4):707-714. PMID: 9493483 [No amitriptyline and mianserin. outcome of interest] Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1988;95 3.Ackerman DL, Greenland S, Bystritsky A, et Suppl:34-36. PMID: 3133712 [Not in older al. Side effects and time course of response in adults] a placebo-controlled trial of fluoxetine for the 10.Altamura AC, Mauri MC, Rudas N, et al. treatment of geriatric depression. J Clin Clinical activity and tolerability of trazodone, Psychopharmacol. 2000;20(6):658-665. mianserin, and amitriptyline in elderly PMID: 11106138 [Not in older adults] subjects with major depression: a controlled 4.Adeoye OM, Sweet RA, Pollock BG, et al. multicenter trial. Clin Neuropharmacol. Bupropion plasma concentration and 1989;12 Suppl 1:S25-7. PMID: 2663151 [Not antidepressant response in elderly patients: A in older adults] prospective, randomized, double-blind study 11.Altamura AC, Novellis FD, Guercetti G, et International Journal of Geriatric al. Fluoxetine compared with amitriptyline in Psychopharmacology. 2000;2(3):132-136. elderly depression: a controlled clinical trial. [Not in older adults] Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1989;9(6):391-6. 5.Aguglia E, Casacchia M, Cassano GB, et al. PMID: 2699465 [Acute care setting] Double-blind study of the efficacy and safety 12.Altamura AC, Percudani M, Guercetti G, et of sertraline versus fluoxetine in major al. Efficacy and tolerability of fluoxetine in depression. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. the elderly: A double-blind study versus 1993;8(3):197-202. PMID: 8263318 [Not in amitryptiline. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. older adults] 1989;4(Suppl 1):103-106. PMID: 2783697 6.Alam MY, Jacobsen PL, Chen Y, et al. Safety, [Acute care setting] tolerability, and efficacy of vortioxetine (Lu 13.Ambree O, Bergink V, Grosse L, et al. AA21004) in major depressive disorder: S100B Serum Levels Predict Treatment results of an open-label, flexible-dose, 52- Response in Patients with Melancholic week extension study. Int Clin Depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. Psychopharmacol. 2014;29(1):36-44. PMID: 2015;19(3):pyv103. PMID: 26364276 [Not in 24169027 [Not in older adults] older adults] 7.Allard J, Artero S, Ritchie K. Consumption of 14.Amsterdam JD, Brunswick DJ. Site psychotropic medication in the elderly: a re- variability in treatment outcome in evaluation of its effect on cognitive antidepressant trials. Prog performance.
Recommended publications
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0190743 A1 Bain Et Al
    US 2012O190743A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0190743 A1 Bain et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jul. 26, 2012 (54) COMPOUNDS FOR TREATING DISORDERS Publication Classification OR DISEASES ASSOCATED WITH (51) Int. Cl NEUROKININ 2 RECEPTORACTIVITY A6II 3L/23 (2006.01) (75) Inventors: Jerald Bain, Toronto (CA); Joel CD7C 69/30 (2006.01) Sadavoy, Toronto (CA); Hao Chen, 39t. ii; C Columbia, MD (US); Xiaoyu Shen, ( .01) Columbia, MD (US) A6IPI/00 (2006.01) s A6IP 29/00 (2006.01) (73) Assignee: UNITED PARAGON A6IP II/00 (2006.01) ASSOCIATES INC., Guelph, ON A6IPI3/10 (2006.01) (CA) A6IP 5/00 (2006.01) A6IP 25/00 (2006.01) (21) Appl. No.: 13/394,067 A6IP 25/30 (2006.01) A6IP5/00 (2006.01) (22) PCT Filed: Sep. 7, 2010 A6IP3/00 (2006.01) CI2N 5/071 (2010.01) (86). PCT No.: PCT/US 10/48OO6 CD7C 69/33 (2006.01) S371 (c)(1) (52) U.S. Cl. .......................... 514/552; 554/227; 435/375 (2), (4) Date: Apr. 12, 2012 (57) ABSTRACT Related U.S. Application Data Compounds, pharmaceutical compositions and methods of (60) Provisional application No. 61/240,014, filed on Sep. treating a disorder or disease associated with neurokinin 2 4, 2009. (NK) receptor activity. Patent Application Publication Jul. 26, 2012 Sheet 1 of 12 US 2012/O190743 A1 LU 1750 15OO 1250 OOO 750 500 250 O O 20 3O 40 min SampleName: EM2OO617 Patent Application Publication Jul. 26, 2012 Sheet 2 of 12 US 2012/O190743 A1 kixto CFUgan <tro CFUgan FIG.2 Patent Application Publication Jul.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2015/072852 Al 21 May 2015 (21.05.2015) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2015/072852 Al 21 May 2015 (21.05.2015) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A61K 36/84 (2006.01) A61K 31/5513 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A61K 31/045 (2006.01) A61P 31/22 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, A61K 31/522 (2006.01) A61K 45/06 (2006.01) BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (21) International Application Number: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, PCT/NL20 14/050780 KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, (22) International Filing Date: MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, 13 November 2014 (13.1 1.2014) PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, (25) Filing Language: English TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (26) Publication Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (30) Priority Data: kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 61/903,430 13 November 2013 (13. 11.2013) US GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, (71) Applicant: RJG DEVELOPMENTS B.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Selective Blockade of NK2 Or NK3 Receptors Produces Anxiolytic- and Antidepressant-Like Effects in Gerbils ⁎ N
    Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 83 (2006) 533–539 www.elsevier.com/locate/pharmbiochembeh Selective blockade of NK2 or NK3 receptors produces anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects in gerbils ⁎ N. Salomé, J. Stemmelin, C. Cohen , G. Griebel Sanofi-Aventis, Department of Psychopharmacology, 31 av Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 92220 Bagneux, France Received 17 October 2005; received in revised form 1 March 2006; accepted 9 March 2006 Available online 19 April 2006 Abstract There is a growing interest in the potential anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects of compounds that target neurokinin receptors. Since the structure and the pharmacology of the human neurokinin receptor resembles that of gerbils, rather than that of mice or rats, we decided to investigate the anxiolytic- and /or antidepressant-like effects of NK1 (SSR240600), NK2 (saredutant) and NK3 (osanetant) receptor antagonists in gerbils. It was found that saredutant (3–10 mg/kg, p.o.) and osanetant (3–10 mg/kg, p.o.) produced anxiolytic-like effects in the gerbil social interaction test. These effects were similar to those obtained with the V1b receptor antagonist SSR149415 (3–10 mg/kg, p.o.), diazepam (1 mg/kg, p.o.) and buspirone (10 mg/kg, p.o.). Fluoxetine and SSR240600 were devoid of effects in this test. In the tonic immobility test in gerbils, saredutant (5–10 mg/kg, i.p.) and osanetant (5–10 mg/kg, i.p.) produced similar effects to those observed with fluoxetine (7.5–15 mg/kg, i.p.), SSR149415 (10–30 mg/kg, p.o.) and buspirone (3 mg/kg, i.p.). Diazepam and SSR240600 were inactive in this paradigm.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Stems in the Selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances
    WHO/PSM/QSM/2006.3 The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances 2006 Programme on International Nonproprietary Names (INN) Quality Assurance and Safety: Medicines Medicines Policy and Standards The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances FORMER DOCUMENT NUMBER: WHO/PHARM S/NOM 15 © World Health Organization 2006 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Antidepressant Potential of Nitrogen-Containing Heterocyclic Moieties: an Updated Review
    Review Article Antidepressant potential of nitrogen-containing heterocyclic moieties: An updated review Nadeem Siddiqui, Andalip, Sandhya Bawa, Ruhi Ali, Obaid Afzal, M. Jawaid Akhtar, Bishmillah Azad, Rajiv Kumar Department of ABSTRACT Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Depression is currently the fourth leading cause of disease or disability worldwide. Antidepressant is Faculty of Pharmacy, Jamia Hamdard approved for the treatment of major depression (including paediatric depression), obsessive-compulsive University, Hamdard disorder (in both adult and paediatric populations), bulimia nervosa, panic disorder and premenstrual Nagar, New Delhi - dysphoric disorder. Antidepressant is a psychiatric medication used to alleviate mood disorders, such as 110 062, India major depression and dysthymia and anxiety disorders such as social anxiety disorder. Many drugs produce an antidepressant effect, but restrictions on their use have caused controversy and off-label prescription a Address for correspondence: risk, despite claims of superior efficacy. Our current understanding of its pathogenesis is limited and existing Dr. Sandhya Bawa, E-mail: sandhyabawa761@ treatments are inadequate, providing relief to only a subset of people suffering from depression. Reviews of yahoo.com literature suggest that heterocyclic moieties and their derivatives has proven success in treating depression. Received : 08-02-11 Review completed : 15-02-11 Accepted : 17-02-11 KEY WORDS: Antidepressant, depression, heterocyclic epression is a chronic, recurring and potentially life- monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs, e.g. Nardil®) tricyclic D threatening illness that affects up to 20% of the population antidepressants (TCAs, e.g. Elavil). They increases the synaptic across the globe.[1] The etiology of the disease is suboptimal concentration of either two (5-HT and NE) or all three (5-HT, concentrations of the monoamine neurotransmitters serotonin NE and dopamine (DA)) neurotransmitters.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Evidence for Anxiolytic- and Antidepressant-Like Activities of Saredutant (SR48968), an Antagonist at the Neurokinin
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 89 (2008) 36–45 www.elsevier.com/locate/pharmbiochembeh Additional evidence for anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like activities of saredutant (SR48968), an antagonist at the neurokinin-2 receptor in various rodent-models ⁎ Caroline Louis, Jeanne Stemmelin, Denis Boulay, Olivier Bergis, Caroline Cohen, Guy Griebel Sanofi-Aventis Research & Development, Psychopharmacology Department, 31 Avenue Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 92220 Bagneux, France Received 12 August 2007; received in revised form 23 October 2007; accepted 30 October 2007 Available online 5 November 2007 Abstract Central tachykinins have been shown to play a role in the modulation of stress-related behaviours. Saredutant, a tachykinin NK2 receptor antagonist, displayed mixed anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like activities in rodents. The present study aimed at further characterizing its psychotropic properties. Saredutant was tested in the rat social interaction test to further confirm its anxiolytic-like activity, and in a variety of behavioural models sensitive to antidepressant drugs. In the rat social interaction test, saredutant (20 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly increased the time spent in interaction, as did the prototypical anxiolytic agents, diazepam (1 mg/kg, i.p.) and buspirone (1 mg/kg, s.c.), but not the antidepressant, fluoxetine. In a differential reinforcement of low rate-72s task, saredutant (3 mg/kg, i.p.) displayed an antidepressant-like activity by increasing reinforced response rate and percentage of responses emitted in the inter-response time bin [49–96 s]. In bulbectomized rats, saredutant (20 mg/kg, i.p.) restored the deficit of acquisition of passive avoidance. In rat pups separated from their mother, saredutant (3–10 mg/kg, s.c.) reduced ultrasonic distress calls.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Depressive Disorder
    Understanding_Depression_Cover.ai 1 9/30/2009 12:24:12 PM Understanding and Managing the Pieces of Major Depressive Disorder C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Release Date: August 15, 2009 NEI PRESS Sponsored by Neuroscience Education Institute www.neiglobal.com CME Credit Expires: August 14, 2012 Understanding and Managing the Pieces of Major Depressive Disorder DDepression_Booklet.inddepression_Booklet.indd i 99/30/2009/30/2009 112:24:432:24:43 PPMM Every eff ort has been made in preparing this book to provide accurate and up-to-date information that is in accord with accepted standards and practice at the time of pub- lication. Nevertheless, the author, editors, and publisher can make no warranties that the information contained herein is totally free from error, not least because clinical standards are constantly changing through research and regulation. The author, edi- tors, and publisher therefore disclaim all liability for direct or consequential damages resulting from the use of material contained in this book. Readers are strongly advised to pay careful attention to information provided by the manufacturer of any drugs or equipment that they plan to use. PUBLISHED BY NEI PRESS, an imprint of NEUROSCIENCE EDUCATION INSTITUTE Carlsbad, California, United States of America NEUROSCIENCE EDUCATION INSTITUTE 1930 Palomar Point Way, Suite 101 Carlsbad, California 92008 http://www.neiglobal.com Copyright © 2009 Neuroscience Education Institute. All rights reserved. This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Neuroscience Education Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurokinin Receptor NK Receptor
    Neurokinin Receptor NK receptor There are three main classes of neurokinin receptors: NK1R (the substance P preferring receptor), NK2R, and NK3R. These tachykinin receptors belong to the class I (rhodopsin-like) G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) family. The various tachykinins have different binding affinities to the neurokinin receptors: NK1R, NK2R, and NK3R. These neurokinin receptors are in the superfamily of transmembrane G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) and contain seven transmembrane loops. Neurokinin-1 receptor interacts with the Gαq-protein and induces activation of phospholipase C followed by production of inositol triphosphate (IP3) leading to elevation of intracellular calcium as a second messenger. Further, cyclic AMP (cAMP) is stimulated by NK1R coupled to the Gαs-protein. The neurokinin receptors are expressed on many cell types and tissues. www.MedChemExpress.com 1 Neurokinin Receptor Antagonists, Agonists, Inhibitors, Modulators & Activators Aprepitant Befetupitant (MK-0869; MK-869; L-754030) Cat. No.: HY-10052 (Ro67-5930) Cat. No.: HY-19670 Aprepitant (MK-0869) is a selective and Befetupitant is a high-affinity, nonpeptide, high-affinity neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist competitive tachykinin 1 receptor (NK1R) with a Kd of 86 pM. antagonist. Purity: 99.67% Purity: >98% Clinical Data: Launched Clinical Data: No Development Reported Size: 10 mM × 1 mL, 5 mg, 10 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg Size: 1 mg, 5 mg Biotin-Substance P Casopitant mesylate Cat. No.: HY-P2546 (GW679769B) Cat. No.: HY-14405A Biotin-Substance P is the biotin tagged Substance Casopitant mesylate (GW679769B) is a potent, P. Substance P (Neurokinin P) is a neuropeptide, selective, brain permeable and orally active acting as a neurotransmitter and as a neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor antagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • Panel and Study Groups
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2012) 38, S1–S78 & 2012 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology All rights reserved 0893-133X/12 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org S1 Monday, December 03, 2012 Conclusions: The signaling differences identified in this study have important implications in screening different KOR agonists and antago- nists having distinctly different ligand directed signaling properties. Mini Panel Disclosure: C. Chavkin, Part 1: Consulting for Trevena 2010-2011, 1. Renaissance in Opioid Biology: From Preclinical Concepts to Part 2: Contract with Trevena 2010-2011. Clinical Practice 1.2 The Place of Opiates in the Cortico-basal Ganglia Reward 1.1 Molecular Basis for Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonism: Circuit Implications of Ligand-directed Signaling for the Development of Novel Antidepressants Suzanne Haber* Charles Chavkin* University of Rochester, Rochester, New York University of Washington, Seattle, Washington Background: Reward is a central component for driving incentive- based learning, appropriate responses to stimuli, and habit Background: Preclinical studies have demonstrated the role of formation. Pathology in this circuit is associated with several stress-induced dynorphin release in mediating a component of the diseases including addition. The ventral medial prefrontal cortex anxiogenic and aversive effects of stress exposure. These results (vmPFC), orbital prefrontal cortex (OFC), dorsal anterior cingulate suggest that kappa opioid receptor (KOR) antagonists or low cortex (dACC), striatum, ventral pallidum, and midbrain dopamine efficacy partial agonists may promote stress-resilience in humans neurons are at the center of the circuit associated with reward in and may potentially be useful in treating certain forms of mood general and, in particular addiction. Connectivity between these disorders exacerbated by stressful experience. In rodent models, areas forms a complex neural network that mediates different stress-induced stimulation of dynorphin release produces aversion, aspects of reward processing, that can lead to habit formation.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2011/092290 Al
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date ι 4 August 2011 (04.08.2011) WO 201 1/092290 Al (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C07D 491/048 (2006.01) A61P 25/00 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A61K 31/4162 (2006.01) A61P 39/00 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, A61P 1/00 (2006.01) CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (21) International Application Number: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, PCT/EP20 11/05 1221 KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, (22) International Filing Date: ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, 28 January 201 1 (28.01 .201 1) NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, (25) Filing Language: English TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (26) Publication Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (30) Priority Data: kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 61/300,231 1 February 2010 (01 .02.2010) US GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): NO- TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, VARTIS AG [CH/CH]; Lichtstrasse 35, CH-4056 Basel EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, (CH).
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0069086 A1 Michallow (43) Pub
    US 20060069086A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0069086 A1 Michallow (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 30, 2006 (54) METHODS FOR REGULATING Publication Classification NEUROTRANSMITTER SYSTEMIS BY INDUCING COUNTERADAPTATIONS (51) Int. Cl. A6II 3/55 (2006.01) (76) Inventor: Alexander Michalow, Bourbonnais, IL A6II 3/405 (2006.01) (US) A6II 3/343 (2006.01) A6II 3L/37 (2006.01) Correspondence Address: (52) U.S. Cl. ......................... 514/220; 514/469: 514/649; MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & 5147419 BERGHOFF LLP 3OO S. WACKER DRIVE (57) ABSTRACT 32ND FLOOR CHICAGO, IL 60606 (US) The present invention relates to methods for regulating neurotransmitter systems by inducing a counteradaptation (21) Appl. No.: 11/234,850 response. According to one embodiment of the invention, a method for regulating a neurotransmitter includes the step of (22) Filed: Sep. 23, 2005 repeatedly administering a ligand for a receptor in the neurotransmitter system, with a ratio of administration half Related U.S. Application Data life to period between administrations of no greater than 1/2. The methods of the present invention may be used to address (60) Provisional application No. 60/612,155, filed on Sep. a whole host of undesirable mental and neurological condi 23, 2004. tions. Patent Application Publication Mar. 30, 2006 Sheet 1 of 4 US 2006/0069086 A1 a) first time second period time period -1- tax % max base line N-administration half-life administration next administration Period between administrations time b) first time Second period time period i bad N-administration half-life administration next administration Period between administrations F.G.
    [Show full text]
  • On Neurokinin A-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Asthmatics
    Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 1998 Eur Respir J 1998; 12: 17–23 European Respiratory Journal DOI: 10.1183/09031936.98.12010017 ISSN 0903 - 1936 Printed in UK - all rights reserved The effect of the NK2 tachykinin receptor antagonist SR 48968 (saredutant) on neurokinin A-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatics J. Van Schoor*, G.F. Joos*, B.L. Chasson+, R.J. Brouard+, R.A. Pauwels* aa The effect of the NK2 tachykinin receptor antagonist SR 48968 (saredutant) on neurokinin *Dept of Respiratory Diseases, University A-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatics. J. Van Schoor, G.F. Joos, B.L. Chasson, R.J. Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. +Sanofi Recherche, Brouard, R.A. Pauwels. ERS Journals Ltd 1998. Montpellier, France. ABSTRACT: Inhalation of neurokinin (NK) A causes bronchoconstriction in patients Correspondence: J. Van Schoor with asthma. The NKA-induced bronchoconstriction in isolated human airways is Dept of Respiratory Diseases mediated via the NK2 receptor and inhibited by SR 48968, a potent and specific non- University Hospital peptide tachykinin NK2 receptor antagonist. In the present study, the effect of orally De Pintelaan 185 administered SR 48968 on NKA-induced bronchoconstriction was examined in 12 B-9000 Ghent mild asthmatics. Belgium On the screening day and during the study periods, increasing concentrations of Fax: 32 9 2402341 NKA (3.3×10-9 to 1.0×10-6 mol·mL-1) were inhaled, until the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and specific airway conductance (sGaw) decreased by at least 20 Keywords: Asthma and 50%, respectively. During the study periods, 100 mg SR 48968 or matched pla- bronchoconstriction neurokinin A cebo was ingested in a double-blind, randomized, crossover fashion and NKA provo- tachykinin receptor antagonists cation was performed at 1.5 and 24 h after dosing.
    [Show full text]