DOCSLIB.ORG

The 1649 War Between the Cossacks and the Polish-Lithuanian

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The 1649 War Between the Cossacks and the Polish-Lithuanian a112 - 124 (AD) BATTLE UKRAINE 23/6/05 2:34 pm Page 112 BATTLEFIELDS ANNUAL REVIEW 112 BATTLEFIELDS ANNUAL REVIEW 113 FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM: THE 1649 WAR BETWEEN THE COSSACKS AND THE POLISH- LITHUANIAN COMMONWEALT H To most westerners, the Cossacks remain a mysterious and romanticized people. Nineteenth century writers and artists depict the Cossacks as extraordinary horsemen. This image is often reinforced by descriptions of Cossacks immune to the vigour of the Russian winter as they continued to nip at the heels of Napoleon’s Grand Army in 1812. Novels, like Gogol’s Taras Bulba, and the opera Mazepa, suggests the Cossacks were both cruel and crafty, while ‘The conflict others highlight their barbarity and backwardness. between nobles and By Dr Adrian Mandzy Cossacks would periodically boil over UCH STEREOTYPES ARE OF LIMITED VALUE, the time, as these social outcasts became ever more S term Cossack has evolved over time. Initially skilled in the military arts, Cossack year-round into outright the term was used as a verb to indicate a specific fortified camps developed. Royal officials of the part-time activity that men undertook when in Commonwealth, fearful of the gro w i n g Cossack revolt and the ‘unsettled’ or ‘wild lands’ of the steppe. In number of armed Cossacks, began recruiting these freemen as border guards. So the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth successful were the Cossacks in their rebellion, most of centuries, the Cossacks lived in independent military abilities that by the end of the which were crushed communities along the frontiers of Muscovy, sixteenth century foreign govern m e n t s the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, and appealed to the Cossacks for aid. without much the Ottoman Empire. Like the courier-de- Since the Cossacks saw themselves as bois and cowboys of the Americas, defenders of the frontiers, they believed mercy.’ Cossacks hunted, fished, traded, and that they had the same rights and e x p l o red sparsely settled re g i o n s . privileges as the nobles who defended Periodically, males journeyed to the open the realm. In times of war monarchs frontier, spent their time ‘cossacking’ and reaffirmed Cossack privileges and in re t u rned home. Others joined the times of peace, nobles sought to limit Cossacks and spent their lives raiding Cossack authority. The conflict between nobles and Cossacks would settlements in search of loot. periodically boil over into outright T h roughout the sixteenth century, as Cossack revolt and rebellion, most of magnates began to place ever- i n c re a s i n g which were crushed without much mercy. restrictions on peasants and subjugate them to Yet of all the Cossack wars for rights and ever-increasing servitude, many villagers fled freedom, Bohdan Khmelnytsky’s successful to the steppe frontier. Not all Cossacks, war against the Polish-Lithuanian however, were previously farmers - nobles, Nineteenth century Commonwealth changed the face of burghers and former priests could also be artistic depiction of a Europe forever. found amongst this social estate. Over Bohdan Zenovij Khmelnytsky (c. 1595- Cossack Officer. 112 113 a112 - 124 (AD) BATTLE UKRAINE 23/6/05 2:34 pm Page 114 BATTLEFIELDS ANNUAL REVIEW 114 BATTLEFIELDS ANNUAL REVIEW 115 Battlefields Annual Review F I G H T I N G F O R F R E E D O M • T H E C O S S A K S & P O L I S H - L I T H U A N I A N S Together, these two traditional enemies faced the largest and one of the most powerful states in Europe - the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. In May 1648, Hetman Khmelnytsky defeated two Polish-Lithuanian armies, one at Zhovti Vody and another at Korsun. Ukrainian regiments, who served in the Polish-Lithuanian a rmies, defected to Khmelnytsky’s banner. Invigorated by the success of the Cossacks, serfs, peasants and urban dwellers also rebelled. In this ‘Great Revolt’, Jews, Catholics and Polish nobles were killed or driven out from what is today Central Ukraine. Polish nobles responded to the massacres in kind and employed their own terror tactics. Following the destruction of a third Polish-Lithuanian army at Pyliavtsi, Khmelnytsky re t u rned to Kiev where the Ukrainian Orthodox hierarchy treated him as a liberator. Yet is spite of these dramatic victories, the relationship between the rebellious Ukrainians and the Commonwealth remained unclear. The Cossack elite and long-serving rank and file had fought to secure the rights and privileges of noblemen. Others within the Ort h o d o x hierarchy fought for parity with Catholics. Serfs, peasants and the lower urban classes struggled General Map of Central Europe. Showing the locations of the battlefield. against economic exploitation. Since neither 1657) was born on his father’s estate successor of the Polish-Lithuanian Khmelnytsky nor the monarch could propose a at Subotiv, in what is today Central Commonwealth, it was in fact a multi- peaceful solution to the ongoing conflict, the Ukraine. After completing his ethnic and multi-religious state in war continued into 1649. education, Bohdan joined his father which class was more important than In preparation for the spring campaign, more in a war against the Ottoman Turks nationality or religion. During the Cossacks, peasants, townsmen, and nobles and in 1620 he was capture d mid-seventeenth century, many old joined Khmelnytsky and his Tatar ally Khan following the battle of Cecora established Ukrainian nobles held key Islam Girei. Against this force stood thre e (Moldavia). After two years of offices within the Polish-Lithuanian separate Polish armies and a Lithuanian army. captivity in Istanbul, Khmelnytsky’s Commonwealth. The Polish armies struck first and consolidated A 1649 military engineering map of the 1649 Battle of ransom was paid and he returned As a Cossack, Khmelnytsky could their forces at the fortress of Zbarazh under home to his estate at Subotiv. In time, not attain justice in a legal system Prince Jeremi Wi [niowiecki, while the Zboriv; most likely completed by Christopher Houwaldt, a he rose to the rank of colonel, but in c o n t rolled by nobles and in the Lithuanian army moved south to attack Saxon. Original map is in Berlin. 1638, based on a rumour of his autumn of 1647, he was placed under Khmelnytsky’s forces. In such a manner, the p a rticipation in a failed Cossack a rrest on the orders of the local Commonwealth hoped to trap Khmelnysky between the town of Zboriv, less than a day’s ride from Zbarazh, rebellion he was demoted to captain. magistrate. After escaping custody, in Polish and the Lithuanian army. Unfortunately for the Khmelnytsky ambushed the monarc h ’s army as it Over the next decade, Khmelnytsky January 1648, Khmelnytsky fled to the Commonwealth, the Cossacks were able to turn back the crossed the Strypa River. Suffering heavy losses, the offered his services to the monarchy Zaporozhian Sich, the Cossack armed Lithuanian army and advance on the Polish army at Polish-Lithuanian forces established a defensive and was involved in the development A 1651 engraving of the camp located south of the Dnipro Zbarazh. On 29 June, Khmelnytsky reached Zbarazh perimeter and as evening fell, the king’s arm y of his estate. In 1646, a raid by a Ukrainian Cossack leader, River rapids. Now beyond the reach of and besieged the Polish arm y. Surrounded and constructed earthworks in preparation for the coming Polish nobleman on Khmelnytsky’s Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky. Polish authorities, Khmelnytsky outnumbered, the only hope of salvation lay in the battle. In the morning, Cossacks and Tatars breached the property resulted in the death of his persuaded the local Cossacks that they timely arrival of a relief force. partially completed defensive works. German troops in youngest son. Khmelnytsky tried to find redress to his needed to defend their rights and rebel against their The newly elected King Jan Casimir, personally led a the service of the crown successfully counter-attacked claims in the courts of the Polish-Lithuanian injustices. Unlike other previous Cossack rebellions, second army to free the Polish troops trapped at and sealed the breaches in the line, but in doing so the Commonwealth, which then ruled Ukraine. While the which failed due to the lack of cavalry, Khmelnytsky Zbarazh. Leaving a force behind to maintain the siege, king exhausted his only remaining military reserves. modern day Polish state considers itself to be the direct created an alliance with the Muslim Crimean Tatars. Khmelnytsky moved to intercept the king. Outside the Surrounded and with no hope for rescue, the crown 114 115 a112 - 124 (AD) BATTLE UKRAINE 23/6/05 2:34 pm Page 116 BATTLEFIELDS ANNUAL REVIEW 116 BATTLEFIELDS ANNUAL REVIEW 117 Battlefields Annual Review F I G H T I N G F O R F R E E D O M • T H E C O S S A K S & P O L I S H - L I T H U A N I A N S opened negotiations with the rebels. The perspective of people who are poorly archaeological record into a holistic sites such as camps, castles and resulting Treaty of Zboriv created an re p resented within the documentary interpretation of these events. The fortresses. The best-known exception autonomous Ukrainian Cossack state. re c o rd. This applies to non-literate first attempt to link the historical to this was Shvechnikov’s Not surprisingly, the Wars of Bohdan societies who left no historic record, those accounts of the battlefield with the excavations at the 1651 Cossack Khmelnytsky are among the most ignored in the historical record (the poor, local topography was undertaken Battle of Berestechko, where, over important events in the history of East illiterate or marginalized groups), and by the Ukrainian historian Ivan the course of multiple field seasons, Central Europe.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Khmelnytsky Uprising Was a Cossack Rebellion in Ukraine Between the Years 1648–1657 Which Turned Into a Ukrainian War of Liberation from Poland
    The Khmelnytsky Uprising was a Cossack rebellion in Ukraine between the years 1648–1657 which turned into a Ukrainian war of liberation from Poland. Under the command of Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky , the Cossacks [warrior caste] allied with the Crimean Tatars, and the local peasantry, fought several battles against forces of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The result was an eradication of the control of the Polish and their Jewish intermediaries. Between 1648 and 1656, tens of thousands of Jews—given the lack of reliable data, it is impossible to establish more accurate figures—were killed by the rebels, and to this day the Khmelnytsky uprising is considered by Jews to be one of the most traumatic events in their history . The losses inflicted on the Jews of Poland during the fatal decade 1648-1658 were appalling. In the reports of the chroniclers, the number of Jewish victims varies between one hundred thousand and five hundred thousand…even exceeding the catastrophes of the Crusades and the Black Death in Western Europe. Some seven hundred Jewish communities in Poland had suffered massacre and pillage . In the Ukrainian cities situated on the left banks of the Dnieper, the region populated by Cossacks... the Jewish communities had disappeared almost completely . In 1 the localities on the right shore of the Dneiper or in the Polish part of the Ukraine as well as those of Volhynia and Podolia, wherever Cossacks had made their appearance, only about one tenth of the Jewish population survived . http://www.holocaust-history.org/questions/ukrainians.shtml Our research shows that a significant portion of the Ukrainian population voluntarily cooperated with the invaders of their country and voluntarily assisted in the Holocaust.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin Struggle for Independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 1-1-1967 The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649. Andrew B. Pernal University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Pernal, Andrew B., "The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649." (1967). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 6490. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/6490 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. THE ROLE OF BOHDAN KHMELNYTSKYI AND OF THE KOZAKS IN THE RUSIN STRUGGLE FOR INDEPENDENCE FROM THE POLISH-LI'THUANIAN COMMONWEALTH: 1648-1649 by A ‘n d r e w B. Pernal, B. A. A Thesis Submitted to the Department of History of the University of Windsor in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Faculty of Graduate Studies 1967 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructive Forgery: the Hadiach Agreement (1658) in the History of the Rus'
    Journal of Ukrainian Studies 35–36 (2010–2011) Reconstructive Forgery: The Hadiach Agreement (1658) in the History of the Rus' Serhii Plokhy Few events in Ukrainian and Polish history have provoked as many what-ifs as the agreement concluded between the Cossack hetman Ivan Vyhovsky and representa- tives of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth near the city of Hadiach in the autumn of 1658. Long before the rise of virtual and counterfactual history, historians in Poland and Ukraine defied the maxim of positivist historiography—that history has no subjunctive mood—and plunged into speculation on how differently the history of both countries would have turned out if, instead of fighting prolonged and exhausting wars, Poland-Lithuania and the Hetmanate had reunited in a new and reformed Com- monwealth. Would this have stopped the decline of Poland, the ruin of Ukraine, Ottoman interventions, and the rise of Muscovy as the dominant force in the region? The Union of Hadiach, as the agreement became known in historiography, had the potential to influence all these processes. It envisioned the creation of a tripartite Commonwealth—the Kingdom of Poland, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, and a Principality of Rus', with the Cossack hetman as its official head. The union was the culmination of the activities of moderate forces among the Polish and Ukrainian elites and the embodiment of the hopes and dreams of the Ruthenian (Ukrainian and Bela- rusian) nobility of the first half of the seventeenth century. Nevertheless, the com- promise that the union embodied was rejected by mainstream forces on both sides. The Commonwealth Diet ratified the text of the treaty with a number of important omis- sions, but even in that form it was viewed with suspicion and rejected by the Polish nobiliary elites, which could not reconcile themselves to the prospect of Orthodox Cossacks enjoying equal rights with Catholic nobles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1992, No.26
    www.ukrweekly.com Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc.ic, a, fraternal non-profit association! ramian V Vol. LX No. 26 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY0, JUNE 28, 1992 50 cents Orthodox Churches Kravchuk, Yeltsin conclude accord at Dagomys summit by Marta Kolomayets Underscoring their commitment to signed by the two presidents, as well as Kiev Press Bureau the development of the democratic their Supreme Council chairmen, Ivan announce union process, the two sides agreed they will Pliushch of Ukraine and Ruslan Khas- by Marta Kolomayets DAGOMYS, Russia - "The agree­ "build their relations as friendly states bulatov of Russia, and Ukrainian Prime Kiev Press Bureau ment in Dagomys marks a radical turn and will immediately start working out Minister Vitold Fokin and acting Rus­ KIEV — As The Weekly was going to in relations between two great states, a large-scale political agreements which sian Prime Minister Yegor Gaidar. press, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church change which must lead our relations to would reflect the new qualities of rela­ The Crimea, another difficult issue in faction led by Metropolitan Filaret and a full-fledged and equal inter-state tions between them." Ukrainian-Russian relations was offi­ the Ukrainian Autocephalous Ortho­ level," Ukrainian President Leonid But several political breakthroughs cially not on the agenda of the one-day dox Church, which is headed by Metro­ Kravchuk told a press conference after came at the one-day meeting held at this summit, but according to Mr. Khasbu- politan Antoniy of Sicheslav and the conclusion of the first Ukrainian- beach resort, where the Black Sea is an latov, the topic was discussed in various Pereyaslav in the absence of Mstyslav I, Russian summit in Dagomys, a resort inviting front yard and the Caucasus circles.
    [Show full text]
  • CIUS: 30 Years of Excellence
    CIUS Newsletter 2006 1 From the Director volume, comprising 15,000 entries, ship and cooperative ventures with CIUS: 30 Years and the Internet Encyclopedia of the Institute of Historical Research Ukraine has already posted some at the Ivan Franko National Univer- of Excellence 2,000 entries. sity of Lviv; the Ivan Krypiakevych Institute of Ukrainian Studies at the Th is year the Canadian Institute of • CIUS has become the leading West- National Academy of Sciences of Ukrainian Studies marks the thirtieth ern centre for the study of Ukrainian Ukraine; and the Mykhailo Hru- anniversary of its founding. In the history. Th is has been achieved shevsky Institute of Ukrainian course of these three decades, CIUS has through several major projects: the Archaeography and Source Studies gained a reputation for excellence based translation, editing, and publica- at the National Academy of Sciences on accomplishments that have helped tion of four volumes of Mykhailo of Ukraine. It has close ties with a defi ne the direction and pace of devel- Hrushevsky’s classic ten-volume group of scholars, organized as the opment of Ukrainian studies in North History of Ukraine-Rus΄, the devel- America, Europe, and Ukraine. Some Association of Researchers of Central of the highlights are the following: and Eastern Europe, who are striv- ing to adopt leading-edge Western • CIUS has awarded approximately methodology (mostly postmodern- 64 undergraduate scholarships, 55 ist), as well as with more traditional scholarships in support of M.A. scholars in the Institute of History at theses, 68 fellowships for Ph.D. the National Academy of Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • NARRATING the NATIONAL FUTURE: the COSSACKS in UKRAINIAN and RUSSIAN ROMANTIC LITERATURE by ANNA KOVALCHUK a DISSERTATION Prese
    NARRATING THE NATIONAL FUTURE: THE COSSACKS IN UKRAINIAN AND RUSSIAN ROMANTIC LITERATURE by ANNA KOVALCHUK A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Comparative Literature and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2017 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Anna Kovalchuk Title: Narrating the National Future: The Cossacks in Ukrainian and Russian Romantic Literature This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Comparative Literature by: Katya Hokanson Chairperson Michael Allan Core Member Serhii Plokhii Core Member Jenifer Presto Core Member Julie Hessler Institutional Representative and Scott L. Pratt Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2017 ii © 2017 Anna Kovalchuk iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Anna Kovalchuk Doctor of Philosophy Department of Comparative Literature June 2017 Title: Narrating the National Future: The Cossacks in Ukrainian and Russian Romantic Literature This dissertation investigates nineteenth-century narrative representations of the Cossacks—multi-ethnic warrior communities from the historical borderlands of empire, known for military strength, pillage, and revelry—as contested historical figures in modern identity politics. Rather than projecting today’s political borders into the past and proceeding from the claim that the Cossacks are either Russian or Ukrainian, this comparative project analyzes the nineteenth-century narratives that transform pre- national Cossack history into national patrimony. Following the Romantic era debates about national identity in the Russian empire, during which the Cossacks become part of both Ukrainian and Russian national self-definition, this dissertation focuses on the role of historical narrative in these burgeoning political projects.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Battles and Campaigns in 13Th–19Th Centuries
    POLISH BATTLES AND CAMPAIGNS IN 13TH–19TH CENTURIES WOJSKOWE CENTRUM EDUKACJI OBYWATELSKIEJ IM. PŁK. DYPL. MARIANA PORWITA 2016 POLISH BATTLES AND CAMPAIGNS IN 13TH–19TH CENTURIES WOJSKOWE CENTRUM EDUKACJI OBYWATELSKIEJ IM. PŁK. DYPL. MARIANA PORWITA 2016 Scientific editors: Ph. D. Grzegorz Jasiński, Prof. Wojciech Włodarkiewicz Reviewers: Ph. D. hab. Marek Dutkiewicz, Ph. D. hab. Halina Łach Scientific Council: Prof. Piotr Matusak – chairman Prof. Tadeusz Panecki – vice-chairman Prof. Adam Dobroński Ph. D. Janusz Gmitruk Prof. Danuta Kisielewicz Prof. Antoni Komorowski Col. Prof. Dariusz S. Kozerawski Prof. Mirosław Nagielski Prof. Zbigniew Pilarczyk Ph. D. hab. Dariusz Radziwiłłowicz Prof. Waldemar Rezmer Ph. D. hab. Aleksandra Skrabacz Prof. Wojciech Włodarkiewicz Prof. Lech Wyszczelski Sketch maps: Jan Rutkowski Design and layout: Janusz Świnarski Front cover: Battle against Theutonic Knights, XVI century drawing from Marcin Bielski’s Kronika Polski Translation: Summalinguæ © Copyright by Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej im. płk. dypl. Mariana Porwita, 2016 © Copyright by Stowarzyszenie Historyków Wojskowości, 2016 ISBN 978-83-65409-12-6 Publisher: Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej im. płk. dypl. Mariana Porwita Stowarzyszenie Historyków Wojskowości Contents 7 Introduction Karol Olejnik 9 The Mongol Invasion of Poland in 1241 and the battle of Legnica Karol Olejnik 17 ‘The Great War’ of 1409–1410 and the Battle of Grunwald Zbigniew Grabowski 29 The Battle of Ukmergė, the 1st of September 1435 Marek Plewczyński 41 The
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices I
    Appendices I. Archival Sources Archival research for this monograph was conducted in Lviv, the former capital of Galicia, in 1983. To orient myself in the rich archival holdings of this city, I benefitted from the unpublished manuscript of Patricia K. Grimsted's forthcoming guide to Soviet Ukrainian archives and manuscript repositories' as well as from a number of published works.' Plans to use archives in Ternopil and Ivano-Frankivsk were frustrated, as was the plan to use the manuscript collection of the Institute of Literature of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR (in Kiev). Work in the Austrian archives in 1982 did not uncover sources of direct relevance to the subject of this monograph, but the Viennese archives remain an important and little-explored repository of historical documentation on Galician history. The richest collection of unpublished sources on the history of Galicia during the Austrian period is located in the Central State Historical Archives of the Ukrainian SSR in Lviv (U Tsentrainyi derzhavnyi istorychnyi arkhiv URSR u rn. Lvovi; abbre- viated as TsDIAL). The Central Archives have inherited the papers of various Galician government institutions and major civic organizations. Unfortunately, there is no published guide to these archives, although a number of articles describe aspects of their holdings.' The papers of the Presidium of the Galician Viceroy's Office (U Haiytske narnisnytstvo, rn. Lviv. Prezydiia) are contained in TsDIAL, fond 146, opysy 4-8 (and presumably others). Particularly valuable for this study were documents dealing with the publication and confiscation of political brochures and periodicals, including , Patricia K.
    [Show full text]
  • State Building in Revolutionary Ukraine
    STATE BUILDING IN REVOLUTIONARY UKRAINE Unauthenticated Download Date | 3/31/17 3:49 PM This page intentionally left blank Unauthenticated Download Date | 3/31/17 3:49 PM STEPHEN VELYCHENKO STATE BUILDING IN REVOLUTIONARY UKRAINE A Comparative Study of Governments and Bureaucrats, 1917–1922 UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PRESS Toronto Buffalo London Unauthenticated Download Date | 3/31/17 3:49 PM © University of Toronto Press Incorporated 2011 Toronto Buffalo London www.utppublishing.com Printed in Canada ISBN 978-1-4426-4132-7 Printed on acid-free, 100% post-consumer recycled paper with vegetable- based inks. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Velychenko, Stephen State building in revolutionary Ukraine: a comparative study of governments and bureaucrats, 1917–1922/Stephen Velychenko. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4426-4132-7 1. Ukraine – Politics and government – 1917–1945. 2. Public adminstration – Ukraine – History – 20th century. 3. Nation-building – Ukraine – History – 20th century 4. Comparative government. I. Title DK508.832.V442011 320.9477'09041 C2010-907040-2 The research for this book was made possible by University of Toronto Humanities and Social Sciences Research Grants, by the Katedra Foundation, and the John Yaremko Teaching Fellowship. This book has been published with the help of a grant from the Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences, through the Aid to Scholarly Publications Programme, using funds provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. University of Toronto Press acknowledges the fi nancial assistance to its publishing program of the Canada Council for the Arts and the Ontario Arts Council. University of Toronto Press acknowledges the fi nancial support of the Government of Canada through the Canada Book Fund for its publishing activities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Laboratory of Transnational History: Ukraine and Recent Ukranian Historiography
    Georgiy Kasianov, Philipp Ther. A Laboratory of Transnational History: Ukraine and Recent Ukranian Historiography. Budapest: Central European University Press, 2009. 318 S. ISBN 978-963-9776-43-2. Reviewed by Jenny Marietta Alwart Published on H-Soz-u-Kult (September, 2009) On the question as to whether Ukraine has a trism and has served as a tool for the legitimiza‐ history, which Mark von Hagen discussed over 10 tion of the state since Ukrainian independence in years ago in an article focusing on the absence of 1991. academic tradition of Ukrainian history in North‐ Essays in the frst section of the book discuss ern America and Western Europe Mark von Ha‐ national vs. transnational approaches to the histo‐ gen, Does Ukraine Have a History?, in: Slavic Re‐ ry of Ukraine. Georgiy Kasianov focuses on na‐ view 54 (1995) 3, pp. 658-673. , this book presents tional historiography in his essay “ ‘Nationalized’ a clear answer: yes, it does. Or, as von Hagen for‐ History: Past Continuous, Present Perfect, Fu‐ mulates in “Revisiting the Histories of Ukraine”, ture...”. As he shows, national historiography is his contribution to this book: “If prior to Ukraine’s rooted in the mid-19th century and is linked to most recent independence in 1991 scholars in‐ historians like Mykhailo Hrushevsky, one of the volved in Ukrainian studies often regarded them‐ fathers of Ukrainian historiography and president selves as embattled or besieged […], the fact of of the Ukrainian People’s Republic (1918-20). This Ukraine’s existence is harder to deny today across “first stage” of national historiography lasted in a host of social-science and humanities disci‐ Ukraine itself until the end of World War II and plines” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Iuliia Kysla
    Rethinking the Postwar Era: Soviet Ukrainian Writers Under Late Stalinism, 1945-1949 by Iuliia Kysla A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Department of History and Classics University of Alberta © Iuliia Kysla, 2018 Abstract This dissertation advances the study of late Stalinism, which has until recently been regarded as a bizarre appendage to Stalin’s rule, and aims to answer the question of whether late Stalinism was a rupture with or continuation of its prewar precursor. I analyze the reintegration of Ukrainian writers into the postwar Soviet polity and their adaptation to the new realities following the dramatic upheavals of war. Focusing on two parallel case studies, Lviv and Kyiv, this study explores how the Soviet regime worked with members of the intelligentsia in these two cities after 1945, at a time when both sides were engaged in “identification games.” This dissertation demonstrates that, despite the regime’s obsession with control, there was some room for independent action on the part of Ukrainian writers and other intellectuals. Authors exploited gaps in Soviet discourse to reclaim agency, which they used as a vehicle to promote their own cultural agendas. Unlike the 1930s, when all official writers had to internalize the tropes of Soviet culture, in the postwar years there was some flexibility in an author’s ability to accept or reject the Soviet system. Moreover, this dissertation suggests that Stalin’s postwar cultural policy—unlike the strategies of the 1930s, which relied predominantly on coercive tactics—was defined mainly by discipline by humiliation, which often involved bullying and threatening members of the creative intelligentsia.
    [Show full text]