DOCSLIB.ORG

Isolation of Rhizobacteria in Southwestern Québec, Canada: An

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Isolation of Rhizobacteria in Southwestern Québec, Canada: An Isolation of rhizobacteria in Southwestern Québec, Canada: An investigation of their impact on the growth and salinity stress alleviation in Arabidopsis thaliana and crop plants Di Fan Department of Plant Science Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Macdonald Campus of McGill University 21111 Lakeshore Road, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec H9X 3V9 December 2017 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY © Di Fan, Canada, 2017 Table of contents Abstract ................................................................................................. x Résumé ................................................................................................ xiii Acknowledegments ............................................................................. xv Preface ................................................................................................ xviii Contribution of authors ................................................................................ xviii Chapter 1................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 Chapter 2................................................................................................. 5 Literature Review ................................................................................... 5 2.1 What are root exudates? .......................................................................... 5 2.2 Roles of root exudates .............................................................................. 5 2.2.1 Manipulating the rhizosphere environment ....................................................... 6 2.2.2 Plant-to-microbe signals ....................................................................................... 7 2.2.2.1 Flavonoids ................................................................................................................. 7 2.2.2.2 Jasmonates ................................................................................................................ 8 2.2.2.3 Other nod gene inducers ........................................................................................... 9 2.2.2.4 Strigolactones............................................................................................................ 9 2.2.3 Quorum sensing ................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Plant growth promotion ........................................................................ 12 2.3.1 Root colonization ................................................................................................. 12 2.3.2 Biofertilization ..................................................................................................... 13 ii 2.3.2.1 Nitrogen fixation ..................................................................................................... 13 2.3.2.2 Phosphate solubilization ......................................................................................... 14 2.3.2.3 Iron availability ....................................................................................................... 15 2.4 Phytoremediation ................................................................................... 16 2.5 Phytostimulation .................................................................................... 17 2.5.1 Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) .................................................................................. 17 2.5.2 Gibberellins .......................................................................................................... 18 2.5.3 Cytokinins ............................................................................................................ 18 2.5.4 Regulation of Ethylene ........................................................................................ 19 2.5.5 Other plant growth regulators ........................................................................... 19 2.6 Biocontrol ............................................................................................... 20 2.6.1 Antibiotics ............................................................................................................ 21 2.6.2 Bacteriocins .......................................................................................................... 21 2.6.3 Extracellular lytic enzymes ................................................................................ 22 2.6.4 Siderophores ........................................................................................................ 22 2.6.5 Phytoalexins ......................................................................................................... 23 2.6.6 Control of other biotic stresses ........................................................................... 23 2.6.7 Signal interference............................................................................................... 24 2.6.8 Induced systemic resistance................................................................................ 24 2.7 Novel type of signaling ........................................................................... 26 2.7.1 Nod factors ........................................................................................................... 26 2.7.2 Bacteriocins .......................................................................................................... 27 2.8 Old-timer versus rising star .................................................................. 29 iii 2.9 PGPR screening ..................................................................................... 30 Connecting text ..................................................................................... 33 Chapter 3 ............................................................................................. 34 Isolation and diversity of culturable rhizobacteria associated with economically important crops and uncultivated plants in Québec, Canada ................................................................................................. 34 3.1 Abstract .................................................................................................. 34 3.2 Introduction ........................................................................................... 35 3.3 Materials and Methods .......................................................................... 39 3.3.1 Study site and sample collection ........................................................................ 39 3.3.2 Isolation and preservation of cultivable rhizobacteria .................................... 42 3.3.2.1 Isolation of ectophytic bacteria ............................................................................... 42 3.3.2.2 Isolation of cultivable endophytes ........................................................................... 43 3.3.2.3 Isolation of endophytic bacteria from soybean root nodules .................................. 44 3.3.3 Taxonomic identification and diversity indices ................................................ 45 3.3.3.4 Statistical analysis ............................................................................................ 46 3.4 Results .................................................................................................... 46 3.4.1 Enumeration, isolation, and identification of rhizobacteria ........................... 46 3.4.2 Diversity of culturable ectophytic bacterial ...................................................... 51 3.4.3 Culturable endophytic bacterial community survey........................................ 55 3.5 Discussion................................................................................................ 64 3.6 Conclusions ............................................................................................ 69 Connecting text ................................................................................... 123 iv Chapter 4 ........................................................................................... 124 Inoculation of Arabidopsis thaliana by novel rhizobacterial isolates improves plant growth under normal and stress conditions .......... 124 4.1 Abstract .................................................................................................124 4.2 Introduction ..........................................................................................125 4.3 Materials and Methods .........................................................................129 4.3.1 Plant material, bacterial strains, and growth conditions .............................. 129 4.3.2 Rapid bacterial screening assay ....................................................................... 131 4.3.3 Secondary bacterial screening.......................................................................... 131 4.3.4 Petri plate assay for effects of bacterial inoculation on seedling growth ..... 132 4.3.4.1 Germination activities of Arabidopsis seeds after bacterization .......................... 132 4.3.4.2 In Vitro osmotic stress .......................................................................................... 132 4.3.4.3 In Vitro salt stress ................................................................................................. 133 4.3.4.4 Root architecture analysis ...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluating the Diversity and Phylogeny of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria Associated with Wheat (Triticum Aestivum) Growing in Central Zone of India
    Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2014) 3(5): 432-447 ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 3 Number 5 (2014) pp. 432-447 http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article Evaluating the diversity and phylogeny of plant growth promoting bacteria associated with wheat (Triticum aestivum) growing in central zone of India Priyanka Verma1,2, Ajar Nath Yadav1, Sufia Khannam Kazy2, Anil Kumar Saxena1 and Archna Suman1* 1Division of Microbiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi- 110012, India 2Department of Biotechnology, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur-713209, India *Corresponding author A B S T R A C T The diversity of plant growth promoting bacteria was investigated from wheat growing in different sites in central zone of India. Epiphytic, endophytic and rhizospheric bacteria were isolated using different growth medium. Bacterial diversity was analysed through amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis K e y w o r d s (ARDRA) using three restriction enzymes Alu I, Hae III, and Msp I which led to the grouping of 348 isolates into 24-29 clusters at >75% similarity index. 16S Epiphytic; rRNA gene based phylogenetic analysis, revealed that 134 strains belonged to three Endophytic; phyla namely actinobacteria, firmicutes and proteobacteria with 38 distinct species of 17 genera. Bacillus and Pseudomonas were dominant in rhizosphere while Rhizospheric; Methylobacterium were in phyllosphere. Endophytic niche specific bacteria were PGPB; identified as Delftia and Micrococcus. Sampling of different sites showed variation Drought in diversity indices. In vitro plant growth promoting activities of bacteria exposed stress; more than three beneficial traits which may act independently or concurrently. Biocontrol Phosphate solubilization and siderophores production are the predominant traits exhibited by these microbes.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbiology Laboratory Exercises Third Edition 2020
    MICROBIOLOGY Laboratory Exercises Third Edition Keddis & Rauschenbach 2020 Photo Credits (in order of contribution): Diane Davis, Ines Rauschenbach & Ramaydalis Keddis Acknowledgements: Many thanks to those in the Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers University, who have through the years inspired our enthusiasm for the science and teaching of microbiology, with special thanks to Diane Davis, Douglas Eveleigh and Max Häggblom. Safety: The experiments included in this manual have been deemed safe by the authors when all necessary safety precautions are met. The authors recommend maintaining biosafety level 2 in the laboratory setting and using risk level 1 organisms for all exercises. License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License Microbiology Laboratory Exercises Third Edition 2020 Ramaydalis Keddis, Ph.D. Ines Rauschenbach, Ph.D. Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey CONTENTS PAGE Introduction Schedule ii Best Laboratory Practices Iii Working in a Microbiology Laboratory iv Exercises Preparation of a Culture Medium 1 Culturing and Handling Microorganisms 3 Isolation of a Pure Culture 5 Counting Bacterial Populations 8 Controlling Microorganisms 10 Disinfectants 10 Antimicrobial Agents: Susceptibility Testing 12 Hand Washing 14 The Lethal Effects of Ultraviolet Light 15 Selection of Fungi from Air 17 Microscopy 21 Morphology and Staining of Bacteria 26 Microbial Metabolism 30 Enzyme Assay 32 Metabolic
    [Show full text]
  • A Report of 26 Unrecorded Bacterial Species in Korea, Isolated from Urban Streams of the Han River Watershed in 2018
    Journal of Species Research 8(3):249-258, 2019 A report of 26 unrecorded bacterial species in Korea, isolated from urban streams of the Han River watershed in 2018 Yochan Joung§,1, Hye-Jin Jang§,1, Myeong Woon Kim§,2, Juchan Hwang1, Jaeho Song1 and Jang-Cheon Cho1,* 1Department of Biological Sciences, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea 2Department of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Daejin University, Hoguk-ro 1007, Pocheon-si, Gyeonggi-do 11159, Republic of Korea *Correspondent: [email protected] §These authors contributed equally to this work. Owing to a distinct environmental regime and anthropogenic effects, freshwater bacterial communities of urban streams are considered to be different from those of large freshwater lakes and rivers. To obtain unrecorded, freshwater bacterial species in Korea, water and sediment samples were collected from various urban streams of the Han River watershed in 2018. After plating the freshwater samples on R2A agar, approximately 1000 bacterial strains were isolated from the samples as single colonies and identified using 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses. A total of 26 strains, with >98.7% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity with validly published bacterial species but not reported in Korea, were determined to be unrecorded bacterial species in Korea. The unrecorded bacterial strains were phylogenetically diverse and belonged to four phyla, six classes, 12 orders, 16 families, and 21 genera. At the generic level, the unreported species were assigned to Nocardioides, Streptomyces, Microbacterium, Kitasatospora, Herbiconiux, Corynebacterium, and Microbacterium of the class Actinobacteria; Paenibacillus and Bacillus of the class Bacilli; Caulobacter, Methylobacterium, Novosphingobium, and Porphyrobacter of the class Alphaproteobacteria; Aquabacterium, Comamonas, Hydrogenophaga, Laribacter, Rivicola, Polynucleobacter, and Vogesella of the class Betaproteobacteria; Arcobacter of the class Epsilonproteobacteria; and Flavobacterium of the class Flavobacteriia.
    [Show full text]
  • Inoculation with Mycorrhizal Fungi and Irrigation Management Shape the Bacterial and Fungal Communities and Networks in Vineyard Soils
    microorganisms Article Inoculation with Mycorrhizal Fungi and Irrigation Management Shape the Bacterial and Fungal Communities and Networks in Vineyard Soils Nazareth Torres † , Runze Yu and S. Kaan Kurtural * Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA; [email protected] (N.T.); [email protected] (R.Y.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † Current address: Advanced Fruit and Grape Growing Group, Public University of Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Spain. Abstract: Vineyard-living microbiota affect grapevine health and adaptation to changing environ- ments and determine the biological quality of soils that strongly influence wine quality. However, their abundance and interactions may be affected by vineyard management. The present study was conducted to assess whether the vineyard soil microbiome was altered by the use of biostimulants (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation vs. non-inoculated) and/or irrigation management (fully irrigated vs. half irrigated). Bacterial and fungal communities in vineyard soils were shaped by both time course and soil management (i.e., the use of biostimulants and irrigation). Regarding alpha diversity, fungal communities were more responsive to treatments, whereas changes in beta diversity were mainly recorded in the bacterial communities. Edaphic factors rarely influence bacte- rial and fungal communities. Microbial network analyses suggested that the bacterial associations Citation: Torres, N.; Yu, R.; Kurtural, were weaker than the fungal ones under half irrigation and that the inoculation with AMF led to S.K. Inoculation with Mycorrhizal the increase in positive associations between vineyard-soil-living microbes. Altogether, the results Fungi and Irrigation Management highlight the need for more studies on the effect of management practices, especially the addition Shape the Bacterial and Fungal of AMF on cropping systems, to fully understand the factors that drive their variability, strengthen Communities and Networks in Vineyard Soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudomonas Helmanticensis Sp. Nov., Isolated from Forest Soil
    International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2014), 64, 2338–2345 DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.063560-0 Pseudomonas helmanticensis sp. nov., isolated from forest soil Martha-Helena Ramı´rez-Bahena,1,2 Maria Jose´ Cuesta,1 Jose´ David Flores-Fe´lix,3 Rebeca Mulas,4 Rau´l Rivas,2,3 Joao Castro-Pinto,5 Javier Bran˜as,5 Daniel Mulas,5 Fernando Gonza´lez-Andre´s,4 Encarna Vela´zquez2,3 and A´ lvaro Peix1,2 Correspondence 1Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologı´a, IRNASA-CSIC, Salamanca, Spain A´ lvaro Peix 2Unidad Asociada Grupo de Interaccio´n Planta-Microorganismo, [email protected] Universidad de Salamanca-IRNASA (CSIC), Salamanca, Spain 3Departamento de Microbiologı´a y Gene´tica, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain 4Instituto de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Biodiversidad, Universidad de Leo´n, Leo´n, Spain 5Fertiberia S. A., Madrid, Spain A bacterial strain, OHA11T, was isolated during the course of a study of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria occurring in a forest soil from Salamanca, Spain. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain OHA11T shared 99.1 % similarity with respect to Pseudomonas baetica a390T, and 98.9 % similarity with the type strains of Pseudomonas jessenii, Pseudomonas moorei, Pseudomonas umsongensis, Pseudomonas mohnii and Pseudomonas koreensis. The analysis of housekeeping genes rpoB, rpoD and gyrB confirmed its phylogenetic affiliation to the genus Pseudomonas and showed similarities lower than 95 % in almost all cases with respect to the above species. Cells possessed two polar flagella. The respiratory quinone was Q9. The major fatty acids were C16 : 0, C18 : 1v7c and summed feature 3 (C16 : 1v7c/iso-C15 : 0 2-OH).
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Vertical Flow Exchange on Microbial Community Dis- Tributions in Hyporheic Zones
    Article 1 by Heejung Kim and Kang-Kun Lee* Effect of vertical flow exchange on microbial community dis- tributions in hyporheic zones School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea; *Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected] (Received: November 2, 2018; Revised accepted: January 6, 2019) https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2019/019001 The effect of the vertical flow direction of hyporheic flux advance of hydrodynamic modeling has improved research of hydro- on the bacterial community is examined. Vertical velocity logical exchange processes at the hyporheic zone (Cardenas and Wil- change of the hyporheic zone was examined by installing son, 2007; Fleckenstein et al., 2010; Endreny et al., 2011). Also, this a piezometer on the site, and a total of 20,242 reads were zone has plentiful micro-organisms. The hyporheic zone constituents analyzed using a pyrosequencing assay to investigate the a dynamic hotspot (ecotone) where groundwater and surface water diversity of bacterial communities. Proteobacteria (55.1%) mix (Smith et al., 2008). were dominant in the hyporheic zone, and Bacteroidetes This area constitutes a flow path along which surface water down wells into the streambed sediment and groundwater up wells in the (16.5%), Actinobacteria (7.1%) and other bacteria phylum stream, travels for some distance before eventually mixing with (Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria, Chloroflexi, Planctomycetesm groundwater returns to the stream channel (Hassan et al., 2015). Sur- and unclassified phylum OD1) were identified. Also, the face water enters the hyporheic zone when the vertical hydraulic head hyporheic zone was divided into 3 points – down welling of surface water is greater than the groundwater (down welling).
    [Show full text]
  • Corynebacterium Sp.|NML98-0116
    1 Limnochorda_pilosa~GCF_001544015.1@NZ_AP014924=Bacteria-Firmicutes-Limnochordia-Limnochordales-Limnochordaceae-Limnochorda-Limnochorda_pilosa 0,9635 Ammonifex_degensii|KC4~GCF_000024605.1@NC_013385=Bacteria-Firmicutes-Clostridia-Thermoanaerobacterales-Thermoanaerobacteraceae-Ammonifex-Ammonifex_degensii 0,985 Symbiobacterium_thermophilum|IAM14863~GCF_000009905.1@NC_006177=Bacteria-Firmicutes-Clostridia-Clostridiales-Symbiobacteriaceae-Symbiobacterium-Symbiobacterium_thermophilum Varibaculum_timonense~GCF_900169515.1@NZ_LT827020=Bacteria-Actinobacteria-Actinobacteria-Actinomycetales-Actinomycetaceae-Varibaculum-Varibaculum_timonense 1 Rubrobacter_aplysinae~GCF_001029505.1@NZ_LEKH01000003=Bacteria-Actinobacteria-Rubrobacteria-Rubrobacterales-Rubrobacteraceae-Rubrobacter-Rubrobacter_aplysinae 0,975 Rubrobacter_xylanophilus|DSM9941~GCF_000014185.1@NC_008148=Bacteria-Actinobacteria-Rubrobacteria-Rubrobacterales-Rubrobacteraceae-Rubrobacter-Rubrobacter_xylanophilus 1 Rubrobacter_radiotolerans~GCF_000661895.1@NZ_CP007514=Bacteria-Actinobacteria-Rubrobacteria-Rubrobacterales-Rubrobacteraceae-Rubrobacter-Rubrobacter_radiotolerans Actinobacteria_bacterium_rbg_16_64_13~GCA_001768675.1@MELN01000053=Bacteria-Actinobacteria-unknown_class-unknown_order-unknown_family-unknown_genus-Actinobacteria_bacterium_rbg_16_64_13 1 Actinobacteria_bacterium_13_2_20cm_68_14~GCA_001914705.1@MNDB01000040=Bacteria-Actinobacteria-unknown_class-unknown_order-unknown_family-unknown_genus-Actinobacteria_bacterium_13_2_20cm_68_14 1 0,9803 Thermoleophilum_album~GCF_900108055.1@NZ_FNWJ01000001=Bacteria-Actinobacteria-Thermoleophilia-Thermoleophilales-Thermoleophilaceae-Thermoleophilum-Thermoleophilum_album
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Identification Ofbacteroides Fragilis with Bile and Antibiotic Disks D
    JOURNAL OF CuNICAL MICROBIOLOGY, Apr. 1977, p. 439-443 Vol. 5, No. 4 Copyright C 1977 American Society for Microbiology Printed in U.S.A. Rapid Identification ofBacteroides fragilis with Bile and Antibiotic Disks D. L. DRAPER1 AND A. L. BARRY* Section ofInfectious and Immunologic Diseases, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616, and Clinical Microbiology Laboratories, Medical Center, Sacramento, California 95817* Received for publication 21 December 1976 A simple screening test is described for separating Bacteroides fragilis from other anaerobic gram-negative bacilli. The test utilizes filter paper disks im- pregnated with 25 mg of oxgall (Difco), tested in conjunction with antibiotic identification disks. The bile disks and antibiotic disks are placed on a supple- mented brucella blood agar plate which has been inoculated by swabbing with a standardized cell suspension. After 24 h at 350C in a GasPak jar, resistance to kanamycin and bile is taken as a presumptive identification of B. fragilis. Susceptibility to one or both disks indicates the need for further identification and additional biochemical tests are required. Those strains that produce insuf- ficient growth within 24 h are not likely to be B. fragilis. The reliability of the bile disk method was tested by comparing results with 100 clinical isolates versus results with bile in thioglycolate broth, peptone-yeast extract-glucose broth, and tryptic soy agar. All four bile test methods gave equilvalent results, but the broth media required much longer periods of incubation. Bacteroides fragilis is the anaerobic gram- would quickly identify most B. fragilis strains negative bacillus most frequently recovered could significantly reduce the number of iso- from human infections.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S5. the Information of the Bacteria Annotated in the Soil Community at Species Level
    Table S5. The information of the bacteria annotated in the soil community at species level No. Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species The number of contigs Abundance(%) 1 Firmicutes Bacilli Bacillales Bacillaceae Bacillus Bacillus cereus 1749 5.145782459 2 Bacteroidetes Cytophagia Cytophagales Hymenobacteraceae Hymenobacter Hymenobacter sedentarius 1538 4.52499338 3 Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadales Gemmatimonadaceae Gemmatirosa Gemmatirosa kalamazoonesis 1020 3.000970902 4 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas indica 797 2.344876284 5 Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Streptococcaceae Lactococcus Lactococcus piscium 542 1.594633558 6 Actinobacteria Thermoleophilia Solirubrobacterales Conexibacteraceae Conexibacter Conexibacter woesei 471 1.385742446 7 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas taxi 430 1.265115184 8 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas wittichii 388 1.141545794 9 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas sp. FARSPH 298 0.876754244 10 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sorangium cellulosum 260 0.764953367 11 Proteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria Myxococcales Polyangiaceae Sorangium Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 260 0.764953367 12 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas panacis 252 0.741416341
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Bacteriology
    LECTURE NOTES Degree and Diploma Programs For Environmental Health Students Medical Bacteriology Abilo Tadesse, Meseret Alem University of Gondar In collaboration with the Ethiopia Public Health Training Initiative, The Carter Center, the Ethiopia Ministry of Health, and the Ethiopia Ministry of Education September 2006 Funded under USAID Cooperative Agreement No. 663-A-00-00-0358-00. Produced in collaboration with the Ethiopia Public Health Training Initiative, The Carter Center, the Ethiopia Ministry of Health, and the Ethiopia Ministry of Education. Important Guidelines for Printing and Photocopying Limited permission is granted free of charge to print or photocopy all pages of this publication for educational, not-for-profit use by health care workers, students or faculty. All copies must retain all author credits and copyright notices included in the original document. Under no circumstances is it permissible to sell or distribute on a commercial basis, or to claim authorship of, copies of material reproduced from this publication. ©2006 by Abilo Tadesse, Meseret Alem All rights reserved. Except as expressly provided above, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission of the author or authors. This material is intended for educational use only by practicing health care workers or students and faculty in a health care field. PREFACE Text book on Medical Bacteriology for Medical Laboratory Technology students are not available as need, so this lecture note will alleviate the acute shortage of text books and reference materials on medical bacteriology.
    [Show full text]
  • Culturable Bacteria in the Hedera Helix Phylloplane Vincent Stevens1* , Sofie Thijs1 and Jaco Vangronsveld1,2*
    Stevens et al. BMC Microbiology (2021) 21:66 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02119-z RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Diversity and plant growth-promoting potential of (un)culturable bacteria in the Hedera helix phylloplane Vincent Stevens1* , Sofie Thijs1 and Jaco Vangronsveld1,2* Abstract Background: A diverse community of microbes naturally exists on the phylloplane, the surface of leaves. It is one of the most prevalent microbial habitats on earth and bacteria are the most abundant members, living in communities that are highly dynamic. Today, one of the key challenges for microbiologists is to develop strategies to culture the vast diversity of microorganisms that have been detected in metagenomic surveys. Results: We isolated bacteria from the phylloplane of Hedera helix (common ivy), a widespread evergreen, using five growth media: Luria–Bertani (LB), LB01, yeast extract–mannitol (YMA), yeast extract–flour (YFlour), and YEx. We also included a comparison with the uncultured phylloplane, which we showed to be dominated by Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes. Inter-sample (beta) diversity shifted from LB and LB01 containing the highest amount of resources to YEx, YMA, and YFlour which are more selective. All growth media equally favoured Actinobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria, whereas Bacteroidetes could only be found on LB01, YEx, and YMA. LB and LB01 favoured Firmicutes and YFlour was most selective for Betaproteobacteria. At the genus level, LB favoured the growth of Bacillus and Stenotrophomonas, while YFlour was most selective for Burkholderia and Curtobacterium. The in vitro plant growth promotion (PGP) profile of 200 isolates obtained in this study indicates that previously uncultured bacteria from the phylloplane may have potential applications in phytoremediation and other plant-based biotechnologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Obligate Anaerobe in Thioglycollate Medium
    Obligate Anaerobe In Thioglycollate Medium Restiform and pernicious Monty addled her libertarians chastens rurally or alluding drawlingly, is Lorne ungainful? Ernst often laicises intrusively when haustellate Talbert underpeep parchedly and skiagraph her therapies. Adair uncanonizing shily as Mozartean Gifford tellurizing her unsociableness disentwining septically. Anaerobic bacteria can be identified by separate them in test tubes of thioglycollate broth. Aerobic and Anaerobic Growth Lab Exercise 6 Sp16 Canvas. Enriched Thioglycollate Broth is recommended for the isolation cultivation and identification of society wide following of obligate anaerobic bacteria Composition. How to the center of oxygen allowing the pus should not as they may live session is medium in thioglycollate are entire plate in air and aerobic respiration. We extend such an organism an aerotolerant anaerobe and set just off against an additional category of oxygen relationship Those left black the facultative. A movie free from thioglycollate for the growth of aerobic and anaerobic. Opened under a medium onto a medium on medium low, obligate anaerobe in thioglycollate medium, obligate and environmental parameters. Anaerobic Thioglycollate Medium Base Himedia. Find each pipette, obligate anaerobe growth. Incubation obligate anaerobes will grow abnormal in that portion of turkey broth for the. Obligate Anaerobes are actually poisoned by various forms of oxygen. Enriched Thioglycollate Broth M73 VWR. BBL Thioglycollate Medium Enriched with CiteSeerX. The model organism Escherichia coli is a facultative anaerobic bacterium ie it is solar to operate in both aerobic and anaerobic environments. Thioglycollate medium Difco containing 1 dextrose and B. Oxygen Requirements for Microbial Growth Microbiology. Fluid Thioglycollate Medium Flashcards Quizlet. The Thioglycolate medium other the word hand stands out fast its ability to.
    [Show full text]