Evaluating the Diversity and Phylogeny of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria Associated with Wheat (Triticum Aestivum) Growing in Central Zone of India
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2014) 3(5): 432-447 ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 3 Number 5 (2014) pp. 432-447 http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article Evaluating the diversity and phylogeny of plant growth promoting bacteria associated with wheat (Triticum aestivum) growing in central zone of India Priyanka Verma1,2, Ajar Nath Yadav1, Sufia Khannam Kazy2, Anil Kumar Saxena1 and Archna Suman1* 1Division of Microbiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi- 110012, India 2Department of Biotechnology, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur-713209, India *Corresponding author A B S T R A C T The diversity of plant growth promoting bacteria was investigated from wheat growing in different sites in central zone of India. Epiphytic, endophytic and rhizospheric bacteria were isolated using different growth medium. Bacterial diversity was analysed through amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis K e y w o r d s (ARDRA) using three restriction enzymes Alu I, Hae III, and Msp I which led to the grouping of 348 isolates into 24-29 clusters at >75% similarity index. 16S Epiphytic; rRNA gene based phylogenetic analysis, revealed that 134 strains belonged to three Endophytic; phyla namely actinobacteria, firmicutes and proteobacteria with 38 distinct species of 17 genera. Bacillus and Pseudomonas were dominant in rhizosphere while Rhizospheric; Methylobacterium were in phyllosphere. Endophytic niche specific bacteria were PGPB; identified as Delftia and Micrococcus. Sampling of different sites showed variation Drought in diversity indices. In vitro plant growth promoting activities of bacteria exposed stress; more than three beneficial traits which may act independently or concurrently. Biocontrol Phosphate solubilization and siderophores production are the predominant traits exhibited by these microbes. The many species of genera Bacillus, Exiguobacterium, Micrococcus, Pseudomonas and Psychrobacter showed antagonistic properties against fungal pathogens Fusarium graminerum, Rhizoctonia solani and Macrophomina phaseoli. These promising isolates showing a range of useful plant growth promoting attributes insist to be explored for agricultural applications. Introduction Wheat (Triticum durum L.) is one of the The central zone of India (Madhaya most important cereals world-wide and it Pradesh, Kota region of Rajasthan and is grown in different environments. Jhansi region of Uttar Pradesh) were Drought is one of the major constraints characterised for water stress ecosystem. which hamper wheat production in India. Plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) 432 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2014) 3(5): 432-447 are free-living soil, rhizospheric, epiphytic without causing substantive harm to the and endophytic bacteria that can either host. Bacterial endophytes such as directly or indirectly have an impact on Achromobacter, Microbiospora, plant growth (Glick et al. 1999; Verma et Micrococcus, Micromomospora, Pantoea, al. 2013). PGPB stimulate plant growth in Planomonospora, Pseudomonas, multiple ways viz N2 fixation, synthesize Stenotrophomonoas, Streptomyces and phytohormones (auxin and cytokinin), Thermomonospora have been reported production of siderophores and suppress from wheat (Zinniel et al. 2002; Coombs pathogenic organisms. PGPB has been and Franco 2003; Verma et al. 2013). A reported not only to improve plant growth number of bacterial species associated but also to suppress the plant pathogens, of with the wheat rhizosphere were recovered which Pseudomonas and Bacillus were belonging to genera Azospirillum, well characterised. Pink-pigmented Arthrobacter, Acinetobacter, Bacillus, facultative methylotrophs synthesize a Burkholderia, Enterobacter, Erwinia, variety of metabolites useful for the plants Flavobacterium, Methylobacterium, including phytohormones (Ivanova et al. Pseudomonas, Rhizobium and Serratia 2001; Verma et al. 2013) that promote (Xie et al. 1996; Lavania et al. 2006; plant growth and yield. PGPB are used as Chaiharn and Lumyong 2011; Meena et al. biological control agents to reduce the 2012; Verma et al. 2013). development of plant diseases caused by plant pathogenic fungi, bacteria, viruses The present study attempted to elucidate and nematodes. the bacterial diversity associated with wheat growing in central zone of India, In the last decade, a number of PGPB employing different growth media. associated with wheat and different cereals ARDRA analysis was done for crops have been identified including phylogenetic clustering of the moderately Acinetobacter, Arthrobacter, Azospirillum, drought tolerant isolates. Sequencing the Azotobacter, Bacillus, Burkholderia, 16S rRNA gene of representative strains Citricoccus, Kocuria, Lysinibacillus, was undertaken for identification. Methylobacterium, Paenibacillus, Representative strain from each cluster Providencia, Pseudomonas and Serratia was screen in vitro for plant growth (Coombs and Franco 2003; Conn and promotion in drought stress condition. Franco 2004; Streptomyces 2005; Jha and PGPB inoculants are inexpensive, simple Kumar 2009; Wellner et al. 2011; Meena to use and have no unpleasant effects to et al. 2012; Verma et al. 2013). The land. The use of PGPB may prove useful phyllosphere is common niche for in developing strategies to facilitate wheat synergism between bacteria and plant. and other cereals crops growth in drought Many bacteria such as Pseudomonas and area. Methylobacterium have been reported in the wheat phyllosphere (Wellner et al. Materials and Methods 2011; Meena et al. 2012; Verma et al. 2013). Rhizospheric bacteria have the Samples collection ability to attach to the root surfaces (rhizoplane) allowing these to derive Wheat plants of two var. IWP5007 and maximum benefit from root exudates. HD2987 with rhizospheric soil were Endophytic bacteria live in plant tissues collected from five different sites in 433 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2014) 3(5): 432-447 central zone of India, which included PCR amplification of 16S rDNA and Gwalior, Sagar and Indore region of amplified rDNA restriction analysis Madhya Pradesh, Jhansi region of Uttar (ARDRA) Pradesh and Kota region of Rajasthan (Table 1). A total forty samples, eight Genomic DNA was extracted by the from each site were collected in sterile method as earlier described by Kumar et polythene bags labelled transported on ice al. (2013). The amount of DNA extracted and processes immediately. was electrophoresed on 0.8% agarose gel. Amplification of 16S rDNA was done by Physico-chemical properties of samples using the universal primers pA (5 - AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3 ) and The pH and conductivity of the soil pH (5 -AAGGAGGTGATCCAGCCGCA- samples were recorded on sampling site. 3 ). The amplification was carried out in a Soil samples analyzed for soil organic 100 l volume and amplification carbon, total nitrogen (%), soil organic conditions were used as described earlier matter, exchangeable cations and available (Pandey et al. 2013). The PCR amplified phosphorus was determined as described 16S rDNA were purified by QIA quick earlier Verma et al. (2013). Soil analysis PCR product purification kit (Qiagen). 100 was done at Division of Soil Sciences, ng purified PCR products were digested Indian Agricultural Research Institute, separately with three restriction New Delhi, India. endonucleases Alu I, Hae III and Msp I (GeNei) in 25 l reaction volumes, using Enumeration of wheat associated the manufacturer s recommended buffer bacteria and temperature. The clustering analysis was undertaken using the software, The culturable bacteria from soil and NTSYS-2.02e package (Numerical rhizosphere soil were isolated through taxonomy analysis program package, enrichment using the standard serial Exeter software, USA). Similarity among dilution plating technique employing nine the isolates was calculated by Jaccard s different growth media as described earlier and dendrogram was constructed using the (Verma et al. 2013). Endophytic and UPGMA method (Nei and Li 1979). epiphytic bacteria were isolated using methods described by Conn and Franco 16S rDNA Sequencing and phylogenetic (2004) and Holland and Polacco (1994) analysis respectively. The plates were incubated at 30 °C and the population was counted PCR amplified 16S rRNA genes were after 3-7 days. Colonies that appeared purified and sequenced using both pA and were purified by repeated re-streaking to pH primers for forward and reverse obtain pure colonies using respective reactions respectively. Sequencing medium plates. The pure cultures were employed a dideoxy cycle with fluorescent maintained at 4 °C as slant and glycerol terminators and was run in a 3130xl stock (25 %) at -80 °C for further use. All Applied Biosystems ABI prism automated the isolates were screened in triplicates for DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, tolerance to pH and drought [Low water Foster City, CA) at SCI Genome Chennai, potential on polyethylene glycol (PEG- India. 16S rRNA gene sequences were 8000) - infused plates] as described earlier analysed using codon code aligner v.4.0.4. Yadav et al. (2014). 434 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2014) 3(5): 432-447 The 16S rRNA gene sequences were phaseoli according to the method aligned to those of closely related bacterial described by Verma et al. (2013). species available at GenBank database using BLASTn program. Bacterial isolates Statistical Analysis were identified based on percentage of sequence similarity ( 97%) with that of a In order to compare the bacterial diversity prototype strain sequence in the GenBank. among