DOCSLIB.ORG

Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland RECORD OF DECISION FT-03, Fire Training Area 2 Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland ~J ••• United States• Air Force United States Environmental Protection Agency Region III FT-03, Fire Training Area 2 Andrews Air Force Base, MD Record of Decision September 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 DECLARATION .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Site Name and Location ....................................................................................... 1 1.2 Statement of Basis and Purpose .......................................................................... 1 1.3 Assessment of the Site......................................................................................... 1 1.4 Description of the Selected Remedy .................................................................... 1 1.5 Statutory Determinations ...................................................................................... 4 1.6 ROD Data Certification Checklist.......................................................................... 5 1.7 Authorizing Signatures ......................................................................................... 5 2.0 DECISION SUMMARY................................................................................ 6 2.1 Site Name, Location, and Description .................................................................. 6 2.2 Site History, Enforcement Activities, and Investigations ....................................... 6 2.2.1 Site History .............................................................................................. 6 2.2.2 Previous Investigations............................................................................ 7 2.2.3 Focused Feasibility Study (2007)........................................................... 10 2.2.4 Enforcement Activities ........................................................................... 10 2.3 Community Participation..................................................................................... 11 2.4 Scope and Role of Response Action .................................................................. 11 2.5 Site Characteristics............................................................................................. 12 2.5.1 Physical Setting ..................................................................................... 12 2.5.2 Conceptual Site Model........................................................................... 13 2.5.3 Nature and Extent of Contamination...................................................... 14 2.6 Current and Potential Future Land and Water Uses........................................... 17 2.7 Summary of Site Risks ....................................................................................... 18 2.7.1 Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment Process............................... 18 2.7.2 Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment Results—General................ 21 2.7.3 Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment Results—Soil ...................... 22 2.7.4 Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment Results—Groundwater........ 22 2.7.5 Uncertainty Associated with HHRA for Soil and Groundwater............... 23 2.7.6 Ecological Risk Assessment.................................................................. 23 2.7.7 Conclusions of Risk Assessment and Basis for Action.......................... 23 2.8 Remedial Action Objectives................................................................................ 24 2.9 Description of Remedial Alternatives for Soil and Groundwater ......................... 24 2.9.1 Alternative 1: No Action ........................................................................ 24 2.9.2 Alternative 2: Institutional Controls ....................................................... 25 2.9.3 Alternative 3: Institutional Controls with Monitoring ............................... 25 2.9.4 Alternative 4: Excavation and Off-Site Disposal of Contaminated Soil and Institutional Controls with Monitoring .............................................. 26 2.9.5 Alternative 5: In-Situ Chemical Oxidation and Institutional Controls with Monitoring.............................................................................................. 27 2.9.6 Common Elements and Distinguishing Features of Each Alternative.... 28 Page i FT-03, Fire Training Area 2 Andrews Air Force Base, MD Record of Decision September 2008 2.9.7 Expected Outcomes of Each Alternative ............................................... 29 2.10 Summary of Comparative Analysis of Alternatives............................................. 29 2.10.1 Threshold Criteria .................................................................................. 30 2.10.2 Balancing Criteria .................................................................................. 30 2.10.3 Modifying Criteria................................................................................... 31 2.11 Principal Threat Wastes ..................................................................................... 31 2.12 Selected Remedy for Soil and Groundwater....................................................... 32 2.12.1 Rationale for the Selected Remedy ....................................................... 32 2.12.2 Detailed Description of the Selected Remedy ....................................... 33 2.12.3 Summary of the Estimated Remedy Costs ............................................ 36 2.12.4 Estimated Outcomes of Selected Remedy ............................................ 37 2.13 Statutory Determinations for Groundwater Remedy........................................... 37 2.13.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment................................. 38 2.13.2 Compliance with ARARs........................................................................ 38 2.13.3 Cost Effectiveness................................................................................. 38 2.13.4 Utilization of Permanent Solutions and Alternative Treatment (or Resource Recovery) Technologies to the Maximum Extent Practicable 39 2.13.5 Five-Year Review Requirements ........................................................... 39 2.14 Documentation of Significant Changes............................................................... 39 3.0 RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY.............................................................. 40 3.1 Overview ............................................................................................................ 40 3.2 Background on Community Involvement ............................................................ 40 3.3 Summary of Comments Received During the Public Comment Period and Air Force Responses ............................................................................................... 41 4.0 REFERENCES.......................................................................................... 43 FIGURES 2-1 Andrews Air Force Base and Vicinity Map 2-2 Location of FT-03 Within Andrews AFB 2-3 1960 Aerial Photograph Showing Former Fire Training Area Near Central Portion of FT-03 2-4 Aerial Photograph, Year 2008 Golf Course 2-5 Soil Sampling Locations and Areas of Soil Contamination 2-6 Groundwater Sampling Locations with Detected Concentrations (µg/L) Driving Potential Risk 2-7 Conceptual Site Model Diagram Prior to the Human Health Risk Assessment 2-8 Boundary of Institutional Controls Implementation Page ii FT-03, Fire Training Area 2 Andrews Air Force Base, MD Record of Decision September 2008 TABLES 2-1 Summary of Receptor Cancer Risks Exceeding 1 x 10-4, Unrestricted Use Scenario 2-2 Summary of Receptor Non-Cancer Hazard Indexes (HI) Exceeding 1, Unrestricted Use Scenario 2-3 Summary of Detected COCs with Associated Locations at FT-03 2-4 Cost Comparison for Remedial Alternatives 2-5 Comparative Analysis of NCP Evaluation Criteria for the FT-03 Remedial Alternatives 2-6 Cost Summary—Alternative 3, Institutional Controls with Monitoring APPENDICES Appendix A Maryland Department of the Environment Concurrence Letter Appendix B Public Meeting Newspaper Notices Appendix C Summary Transcript of the Public Meeting for the Proposed Remedial Action Plan – FT-03 Site, February 21, 2008 Page iii FT-03, Fire Training Area 2 Andrews Air Force Base, MD Record of Decision September 2008 ACRONYMS and ABBREVIATIONS AFB Air Force Base ARAR Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement BEHP Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate BTEX Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes CD-ROM Compact disc-read only memory CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations COC Contaminant of concern COMAR Code of Maryland Regulations COPC Contaminant of potential concern CSF Cancer slope factor CSM Conceptual site model D.C. District of Columbia DCE Dichloroethene DP Direct push ER Environmental restoration ERA Ecological Risk Assessment FFS Focused Feasibility Study FT-03 Fire Training Area 2 GIS Geographic Information System gpm Gallons per minute HHRA Human Health Risk Assessment HI Hazard index HQ Hazard quotient IC Institutional control ISCO In-situ chemical oxidation MCL Maximum Contaminant Level MD Maryland MDE Maryland Department of the Environment mg/kg Milligram per kilogram MOGAS Motor vehicle gasoline MW Monitoring well Page iv FT-03, Fire Training Area 2 Andrews Air Force Base, MD Record of Decision September 2008 NCP National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (commonly referred to as the National Contingency Plan) NPL National Priorities
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Still Serving Joining Digital World Call-Ins Day Late And
    Published by 11th Wing Retiree Activities Offices, National Capital Area June 2014 STILL SERVING JOINING DIGITAL WORLD Baseball legend Satchel Paige warned, “Don’t look back, something might be gaining on you.” Ole Satch was right on the money. A year ago, it appeared that increased mail costs would limit distribution of this publication to the Internet. Col. John Moser, director of Retiree Activities Offices at Andrews and Bolling refused to “look back,” and was able to negotiate another year of home mail delivery to nearly 30,000 Air Force retirees and surviving spouses in the National Capital Area. But the budget staff not only looked back, it looked ahead and concluded that increased costs of Still Serving mail delivery to be among necessary cuts in operational expenditures. Thus, effective with our October issue, newsletter readers will remain informed on subjects of interest to the retiree community through the magic of cyberspace. Those without home computers are encouraged to seek assistance of friends, family members and public outlets such as neighborhood libraries and senior centers. Still Serving will be provided on line during the first week of February, June and October. Plans call for additional “bulletins” to be made available in intervening months on the same electronic outlets. Still Serving remains available through the Andrews website -- Andrews.af.mil -- linking to “Retiree Activities Office,” through the courtesy of the 11th Wing Public Affairs Office. At Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling, the Navy Public Affairs Office makes Still Serving available through its page on DoD’s video center -- tinyurl.com/jbabnews. An open invitation exists for other websites to get on board for this outreach to the area’s military retiree community.
    [Show full text]
  • 79Th MEDICAL WING
    79th MEDICAL WING MISSION 79th Medical Wing is the Air Force's single medical voice for planning and implementing Air Force and joint medical solutions within the National Capital Region (NCR). Activated on May 10, 2006, it is the largest wing within the Air Force District of Washington and only the second medical wing in the Air Force. The 79th Medical Wing is a tenant unit on Andrews, and headquartered at Malcolm Grow Medical Center. As part of its mission, the wing organizes, trains, equips and provides medical forces for Air and Space Expeditionary Force (AEF) deployment, homeland operations and in support of joint operations within the NCR, and is the East Coast hub for aeromedical evacuation aircraft returning sick or injured patients form the Atlantic area. Additionally, the 79th Medical Wing is responsible for providing medical support to Presidential, Congressional, Joint and Air Staff special airlift missions. LINEAGE 79th USAF Infirmary constituted, 20 Jun 1955 Activated, 18 Aug 1955 Redesignated, 79th USAF Dispensary, 8 May 1957 Discontinued, 1 Mar 1960 Redesignated, 79th Medical Wing, 5 May 2006 Activated, 10 May 2006 Activated, 12 May 2006 STATIONS Youngstown Muni Arpt, OH, 18 Aug 1955-1 Mar 1960 Andrews AFB, MD, 10 May 2006 ASSIGNMENTS 79th Fighter Group, 18 Aug 1955-1 Mar 1960 Air Force District of Washington, 10 May 2006 COMMANDERS BG Gar S. Graham HONORS Service Streamers None Campaign Streamers None Armed Forces Expeditionary Streamers None Decorations None EMBLEM Per bend Gules and Azure, surmounted by the Staff of Aesculapius bendwise Silver Gray and between in chief sinister a silhouetted Capitol dome Argent, and in dexter base an inverted triangle of the second charged with a mullet of the fourth, bearing a torteau, winged Or, all within a diminished bordure Yellow.
    [Show full text]
  • President's Page
    July07 Prespage Hastings.qxd 6/4/2007 7:08 PM Page 1 President’s Page I have just returned from our Annual Scientific Meeting in New Orleans. There were some glitches re- lated to the late shifting of all functions to one hotel due to construction activities, for which I apologize. None- theless, I feel the meeting was a great success. There is no experience that matches meeting with one's colleagues from around the globe. I came into New Orleans from the east, where the brunt of Hurricane Katrina was experienced. Seeing the devastation and trying to imagine the despair that ac- companied it, I asked the taxi driver about the spirit of the people of New Orleans. He answered immediately that it was positive, enthusiastic, and hopeful. That warmed my heart. Some meeting participants arrived John D. Hastings, M.D. early and joined a Habitat for Humanity effort for the city; no doubt they felt that spirit. International exchange in outreach programs to reach Experiences in New Orleans and musings about the medical schools and aerospace medicine training pro- duties of this office have given me much to ponder. As grams will be discussed. Vice President of International part of that effort, I have tried to wrap my arms about Activities, Jeff Myers, and his International Activities how the Aerospace Medical Association functions. We Committee will be integral to this effort. are a diverse organization, with 11 constituent and 31 af- The third goal is to examine instruments by which filiate organizations. We come from all walks, ranging AsMA communicates with the global aerospace medicine from basic scientific research to applied research to clini- community and the processes that govern those instru- cal aerospace medicine and individual aeromedical dis- ments.
    [Show full text]
  • 36Th Commencement Exercises Saturday, the Sixteenth of May · Two Thousand Fifteen
    Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences “Learning to Care for Those in Harm’s Way” 36th Commencement Exercises Saturday, the Sixteenth of May · Two Thousand Fifteen The Mace he mace was a weapon of war originating with the loaded club and stone Thammer of primitive man. Although it continued to be used as a weapon through the Middle Ages, during this period it also became symbolic as an ornament representing power. Sergeants-at-Arms, who were guards of kings and other high officials, carried a mace to protect their monarch during processions. By the 14th century, the mace had become more ceremonial in use and was decorated with jewels and precious metals, losing its war-club appearance. Three hundred years later, the mace was used solely as a symbol of authority. The mace is used during sessions of legislative assemblies such as the U.S. House of Representatives, where it is placed to the right of the Speaker. More frequently, maces are seen at university commencements and convocations, exemplifying knowledge as power. The USU mace was a glorious gift from the Honorable Sam Nixon, MD, past chairman of the Board of Regents, and his wife, Elizabeth. The mace was used for the first time at the 1995 commencement ceremony. It is handcrafted in sterling silver and carries the seal of the university along with the emblems of the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force and Public Health Service. The university seal and service emblems are superimposed on the earth’s globe to symbolize the worldwide mission of the university and its graduates.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2010 Air Force Posture Statement
    United States Air Force Presentation Before the House Appropriations Committee, Subcommittee on Defense Defense Health Programs Witness Statement of Lieutenant General (Dr.) Thomas Travis, Surgeon General, USAF April 14, 2015 Not for publication until released by the House Appropriations Committee, Subcommittee on Defense Defense Health Programs April 14, 2015 U N I T E D S T A T E S A I R F O R C E LIEUTENANT GENERAL (DR.) THOMAS W. TRAVIS Lt. Gen. (Dr.) Thomas W. Travis is the Surgeon General of the Air Force, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, Washington, D.C. General Travis serves as functional manager of the U.S. Air Force Medical Service. In this capacity, he advises the Secretary of the Air Force and Air Force Chief of Staff, as well as the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs on matters pertaining to the medical aspects of the air expeditionary force and the health of Air Force people. General Travis has authority to commit resources worldwide for the Air Force Medical Service, to make decisions affecting the delivery of medical services, and to develop plans, programs and procedures to support worldwide medical service missions. He exercises direction, guidance and technical management of a $6.6 billion, 44,000-person integrated health care delivery system serving 2.6 million beneficiaries at 75 military treatment facilities worldwide. General Travis entered the Air Force in 1976 as a distinguished graduate of the ROTC program at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. He was awarded his pilot wings in 1978 and served as an F-4 pilot and aircraft commander.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland National Guard Economic Impacts
    Fort George G. Meade Army Corps of Engineers—Baltimore District Economic Impacts Maryland National Guard Economic Impacts 190,264 jobs; $26.9B in total output; $13.0B in total wages Economic Impacts 4,810 jobs; $0.6B in total output; $0.3B in total wages 3,509 jobs; $0.5B in total output; $0.2B in total wages MARYLAND’S Main Tenants Main Tenants National Security Agency Main Tenants United States Army Defense Information Systems Agency Army National Guard Military Installations Defense Media Activity Air National Guard US Cyber Command Maryland Emergency Management Agency Aberdeen Proving Ground Economic Impacts 58,339 jobs; $7.0B in total output; $3.4B in total wages Adelphi Laboratory Center Economic Impacts Main Tenants 3,242 jobs; $0.3B in total output; $0.2B in total wages Edgewood-Chemical Biological Center Communications-Electronics Command Fort Detrick Main Tenants Research, Development and Engineering Command Economic Impacts Army Test and Evaluation Command 36,782 jobs; $7.0B in total output; $2.7B in total wages Army Research Laboratory Main Tenants Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Coast Guard Yard Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases Economic Impacts National Cancer Institute 3,066 jobs; $0.3B in total output; $0.1B in total wages National Interagency Biodefense Campus Forest Glen Annex Economic Impacts Main Tenants 2,000 jobs; note: economic output and wages along with Electronic Support Detachment Baltimore job totals are aggregated in Ft. Detrick's totals. Legacy Sustainment Support Unit Aids-to-Navigation
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Land Use Study December 2009
    Joint Base Andrews Naval Air Facility Washington Joint Land Use Study December 2009 The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission www.mncppc.org Joint Base Andrews Naval Air Facility Washington Joint Land Use Study December 2009 The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George’s County Planning Department 14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive Upper Marlboro, Maryland 20772 www.mncppc.org/pgco ii Joint Base Andrews Naval Air Facility Washington Joint Land Use Study Contents Chapter 1: Study Purpose and Process 1 1.1 Introduction. ................................... 1 1.2 Study Background . 2 Air Installation Compatible Use Zones . ........... 2 The ointJ Land Use Study (JLUS) Program . ........ 2 1.3 Study Purpose and Goals . 3 1.4 Study Area . 3 1.5 JLUS Policy and Technical Committees . 5 1.6 Public Participation . 5 Chapter 2: Joint Base Andrews and the Community 7 2.1 Base Mission . 7 2.2 Base History . 8 2.3 Base Facilities . 8 2.4 Base Units . .................................... 9 2.5 Base Operations . ................................ 9 Runway and Flight Track Utilization . 10 Future Operations . 14 2.6 Future Base Development Plans . ................... 14 Town Center . 14 Eastern Portion of the Base . 14 North-South Central Corridor. ................. 16 Housing Privatization . 16 Western Industrial Area . 16 Reconfigurations of Existing Functions . 16 2.7 Community Land Use . .......................... 16 2.8 Base Employment and Economic Impact . 19 2.9 Community Demographic Profile . ................. 20 2.10 Prince George’s County Planning Policies . 21 Subregion 4 Master Plan . 24 Subregion 5 Master Plan . 24 Subregion 6 Master Plan . ..................... 25 Subregion VII Master Plan . 25 Westphalia Sector Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Civil Engineers
    Air Vol. 22 No. 3 ForceCivil Engineer 2014 2014 Almanac Vol. 22 No. 3 2014 2014 Almanac AIR STAFF MAJOR COMMANDS FIELD OPERATING Airman of the Year . 60. CE History Book . 60 . Air Force Civil Engineers . 6 ACC . 16 . AGENCY Subject Matter Experts . .61 . Civil Engineering Leaders . 8 AETC . 18 . Index . 62. HQ Air Force A7C Divisions . .10 . AFGSC . 20. AFCEC . 38. Resources . 63. AFMC . 22. Photos: (left to right) On the front and back covers: U.S. Air Force Airmen with Two explosive ordnance disposal technicians place explo- the 455th Expeditionary Civil Engineer Squadron prepare to AFRC . 24 . DIRECT REPORTING sive charges on munitions slated for disposal at an undis- pour concrete on the flightline at Bagram Airfield, Afghani- AFSOC . 26. closed location in Southwest Asia. (U.S. Air Force photo by stan May 22, 2014. The 455 ECES ensures operability of the Senior Master Sgt. Burke Baker/Released) airfield by providing airfield maintenance, construction and AFSPC . 28. UNITS operation for the senior airfield authority mission. (U.S. Air Clark Peterson, 9th Civil Engineer Squadron roof mainte- Force photo by Staff Sgt. Evelyn Chavez) AMC . 30 nance team carpenter, patches an area on the Base Ex- ANG . 32 AFDW . 42 change roof as part of the base roof restoration project at Unless otherwise noted, facts and figures presented are based USAFA . 44. Beale Air Force Base, Calif. (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman on information submitted to the Air Force Civil Engineer PACAF . 34. 1st Class Ramon A. Adelan/ Released) magazine office, current as of Oct. 1 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHICAL DATA BOOKK Class 2019-1 7-18 January 2019 National
    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Class 2019-1 7-18 January 2019 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT NDU VICE PRESIDENT Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge, USN 16th President Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge is an honors graduate of the University of Minnesota with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and was commissioned through the Reserve Officers' Training Corps program. He earned a Master of Science in Engineering Management from the Catholic University of America and a Master of Arts with highest distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies from the Naval War College. He was a fellow of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Seminar XXI program. VADM Fritz Roegge, NDU President (Photo His sea tours include USS Whale (SSN 638), USS by NDU AV) Florida (SSBN 728) (Blue), USS Key West (SSN 722) and command of USS Connecticut (SSN 22). His major command tour was as commodore of Submarine Squadron 22 with additional duty as commanding officer, Naval Support Activity La Maddalena, Italy. Ashore, he has served on the staffs of both the Atlantic and the Pacific Submarine Force commanders, on the staff of the director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion, on the Navy staff in the Assessments Division (N81) and the Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division (N13), in the Secretary of the Navy's Office of Legislative Affairs at the U. S, House of Representatives, as the head of the Submarine and Nuclear Power Distribution Division (PERS 42) at the Navy Personnel Command, and as an assistant deputy director on the Joint Staff in both the Strategy and Policy (J5) and the Regional Operations (J33) Directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Civil Engineer Magazine, Vol. 17, No. 2
    Air Force By Engineers. For Engineers. Vol. 23 No. 2 Winter 2015 Extended Edition with CE Timeline 2015 Almanac Vol. 23 No. 2 Winter 2015 2015 Almanac AIR STAFF AFIMSC MAJOR COMMANDS (continued) Career Field Updates . .50 Subject Matter Experts . 60 HEADQUARTERS. .14 ANG . .36 Air Force Civil Engineers. .6 Index . 62 DETACHMENTS . 16 PACAF . 38 Civil Engineering Leaders. .8 Resources . 63 USAFE-AFAFRICA . 40 HQ Air Force A4C Divisions . 9 MAJOR COMMANDS Photos: (left to right) On the front cover: Airman 1st Class Connor Harrington, PRIMARY SUBORDINATE Airman Aaron Matedne, 48th Civil Engineer Squadron heavy 374th Civil Engineer Squadron Pavement and Equipment ACC . 20 equipment operator, cuts metal at Royal Air Force Laken- apprentice, performs a spall repair at Yokota Air Base, AETC . 22 UNIT heath, England. After the metal is cut down, it’s disposed to Japan. From keeping the flightline mission ready to main- the proper recycling facilities. (U.S. Air Force photo/Airman taining the roads and sidewalks, the work done by the AFGSC . 24 AFCEC . 42 1st Class Dawn M. Weber/released) group of Airmen known as the “Dirt Boys” keep Yokota’s mission going. (U.S. Air Force photo/Airman 1st Class AFMC . 26 Airman 1st Class Fred Jones, 786th Civil Engineer Squadron Delano Scott/released) AFRC . 28 DIRECT REPORTING heavy equipment operator, drives a tractor trailer vehicle Unless otherwise noted, facts and figures presented are based AFSOC . 30 during the Air Force Civil Engineer Center Tractor Trailer on information submitted to the Air Force Civil Engineer Training program, at Ramstein Air Base, Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrews Air Force Base Took Shape the Base’S Former Name, Joint Base Tion—The 79Th Medical Wing, Home to When President Franklin D
    THE MAGAZINE OF IBEW LOCAL 26 SERVING MARYLAND, VIRGINIA AND WASHINGTON, DC 4TH QUARTER 2015 IINVOLUME 8, NO. 4 Inside: VA AND MD PICNICS MINORITY COALITION LABOR NIGHT PHOTOS PAGE 18 / COMMUNITY OUTREACH PAGE 25 / PHOTOS PAGE 27 Business Manager Chuck Graham, Skip McConkey, Business Manager Chuck Graham, Greg Hough, and Foreman Greg Cobaugh and Foreman Greg Cobaugh Fred Aquino Local 26 and Singleton Electric Join Forces to Create a State-of-the-Art Military Medical Facility on the Grounds of Joint Base Andrews Business Manager Chuck Graham and Wendell Fabian Peter Vallandingham down below Subforeman oint Base Andrews is one of the most prominent military installations in the coun- Landon Milstead try and it makes its home here in the Washington, DC, area. Located in Prince George’s County, Joint Base Andrews houses Air Force One, the Boeing aircraft that carries the President of the United States; and on many occasions, has been the first stop in the United States for visiting foreign dignitaries, including kings, queens, prime ministers and popes. The base is a source of great pride for our military and Local 26 is proud to perform work on site. 8 THE MAGAZINE OF IBEW LOCAL 26, SERVING MARYLAND, VIRGINIA AND WASHINGTON, DC INC harge / 4TH QUARTER 2015 9 John Kleha and Greg Gray Mitch Richardson Kyle Barry John Kleha and Greg Gray Business Manager Chuck Graham and Rick Long The Original Medical Clinics and Surgery Center From left, Sean Lavin, Jeff Feldblum, Al White, Rob Palmer, and Mitchell Dicken Andrew Jewett, Mark Neidhardt, and Chris Tovar Andrews Air Force Base took shape the base’s former name, Joint Base tion—the 79th Medical Wing, home to when President Franklin D.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Air Force Installations Worldwide ■ 2012 USAF Almanac
    Guide to Air Force Installations Worldwide ■ 2012 USAF Almanac Active Duty Installations Abbreviations ABW/G Air Base Wing/Group ACW/S Air Control Wing/Squadron AFB/S Air Force Base/Station This section includes Air Force owned and oper- Beale AFB, Calif. 95903. Nearest city: Marys- AFDW Air Force District of Washington ated facilities around the world. (It also lists the ville. Phone: 530-634-3000. Owning command: AFGLSC Air Force Global Logistics Support Center former USAF bases now under other service ACC. Units/missions: 9th RW (ACC), ISR, RPA AFISRA Air Force ISR Agency leadership as joint bases.) It is not a complete operations; 548th ISRG (AFISRA), DCGS; 940th AFNWC Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center list of units by base. Many USAF installations Wing (AFRC), C2, ISR, RPA operations. History: AFOSI Air Force Office of Special Investigations host numerous tenants, not just other USAF opened October 1942 as Army’s Camp Beale. AFRICOM US Africa Command units but DOD, joint, other service, and federal Named for Edward F. Beale, a former Navy officer AFRL Air Force Research Laboratory AFWA Air Force Weather Agency and civil entities. who became a hero of the Mexican-American AGOW Air Ground Operations Wing War and early developer of California, as well ALC Air Logistics Center Altus AFB, Okla. 73523. Nearest city: Altus. as a senior appointee/diplomat for four Presi- AMS Aircraft Maintenance Squadron Phone: 580-482-8100. Owning command: dents. Transferred to USAF 1948. Designated AMW Air Mobility Wing AETC. Unit/mission: 97th AMW (AETC), train- AFB April 1951. AOC/G Air & Space Operations Center/Group ing.
    [Show full text]