DOCSLIB.ORG

C O N T E N T S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
C O N T E N T S C O N T E N T S Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………......... 15 Methodological clarifications …………………………………………………………………….............. 18 Definitions……………………………………………................................................................................. 22 Section I LANDS OF HOUSEHOLD Table 1. Surveyed agricultural holdings by legal status and agricultural lands (as per 10.10.2014)……………………………………………………………………………… 31 Table 1.1 Agricultural holding lands by legal status of holdings…………………………………... 33 Table 1.2 Agricultural holdings by legal status and types of agricultural activities………………. 35 Table 1.3 Agricultural holdings which have own lands by legal status and) by land plots (as per 10.10.2014) ………………………………………………………………………………. 37 Table 1.4 Agricultural holdings by legal status and lands rented by holdings, by land plots (as per 10.10.2014)……………………………………………………………………………. 55 Table 1. 5 Agricultural holdings by agricultural lands and by legal status (as per 10.10.2014)…… 73 75 Table 1.6 Agricultural lands by legal status of agricultural holdings (as per 10.10.2014)……….. Table 1.7 Agricultural holdings by lands rented for agricultural purposes and by legal status (as per 10.10.2014)……………………..................................................................................... 79 Table 1.8 Lands rented for agricultural purposes by lands and by legal status of agricultural holdings(as per 10.10.2014)................................................................................................. 81 Table 1.9 Agricultural holdings by size classes of agricultural land and by legal status (as per 10.10.2014)………………………………........................................................................... 83 Table 1.10 Size classes of agricultural lands by legal status of agricultural holdings (as per 10.10.2014)…………………………………….................................................................. 87 Table 1.11 Agricultural holdings by size classes of arable land and by legal status (as per 10.10.2014)…………………………………………………………….............................. 91 Table 1.12 Size classes of arable lands by legal status of agricultural holdings (as per 10.10.2014).. 95 Table 1.13 Agricultural holdings by size classes of orchards (including nurseries) and by legal status (as per 10.10.2014)…………………………........................................................... 98 6 Table 1.14 Size classes of orchards (including nurseries) by legal status of agricultural holdings (as per 10.10.2014)……………........................................................................................... 102 Table 1.15 Agricultural holdings by size classes of berry-fields (including nurseries) and by legal status (as per 10.10.2014)……………………………....................................................... 106 Table 1.16 Size classes of berry-fields (including nurseries) by legal status of agricultural holdings (as per 10.10.2014)……………………………………………………. 110 Table 1.17 Agricultural holdings by size classes of vineyards (including nurseries) and by legal status (as per 10.10.2014)……………………………………………………………….. 114 Table 1.18 Size classes of vineyards (including nurseries) by legal status of agricultural holdings (as per 10.10.2014)………………………………………………………………………. 118 Table 1.19 Agricultural holdings by size classes of hay fields and by legal status (as per 10.10.2014)………………………………………………………………………………. 122 126 Table 1.20 Size classes of hay fields by legal status of agricultural holdings (as per 10.10.2014)….. Table 1.21 Agricultural holdings by size classes of pastures and by legal status (as per 10.10.2014)……………………………………………………………………………….. 130 Table 1.22 Size classes of pastures by legal status of agricultural holdings (as per 10.10.2014)…… 134 Section II SOWN AREAS OF AGRICULTURAL CROPS Table 2.1 Agricultural holdings by legal status and types of agricultural crops (01.08.2013- 31.07.2014.)…………….................................................................................................... 138 Table 2.2 Sown areas of agricultural crops by types and by legal status of agricultural holdings (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)…………………………………………………………………. 162 Table 2.3 Agricultural holdings with backyards by types of agricultural crops (01.08.2013- 31.07.2014)…………......................................................................................................... 190 Table 2.4 Sown areas of agricultural crops in backyards by types (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)…… 194 Table 2.5 Agricultural holdings by legal status and types of actually irrigated agricultural crops (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)…………………………………………………………………. 198 Table 2.6 Sown areas of actually irrigated1 agricultural crops by types andby legal status of agricultural holdings (01.08.2013-31.07.2014.)…………………………………………. 222 Table 2.7 Agricultural holdings by size classes of sown areas of grain crops and by legal status (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)…………………………………………………………………... 246 7 Table 2.7.1 Agricultural holdings with sown areas of grain crops by size classes of agricultural lands and by legal status (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)………………………………… 250 Table 2.8 Sown areas of grain crops by size and by legal statusof agricultural holdings (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)…………………………………………………………………. 254 Table 2.8.1 Sown areas of grain crops by size classes of agricultural lands andby legal status of agricultural holdings (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)………………………………………….. 258 Table 2.9 Agricultural holdings by size classes of sown areas of leguminous crops and by legal status (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)………………………………………………………… 262 Table 2.9.1 Agricultural holdings with sown areas of leguminous crops bysize classes of agricultural lands and by legal status(01.08.2013 - 31.07.2014.)………………………… 266 Table 2.10 Size classes of sown areas of leguminous crops by legal status of agricultural holdings (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)………………………………………………………………….. 270 Table 2.10.1 Sown areas of leguminous crops by size classes of agricultural lands and by legal status of agricultural holdings (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)……………………………….. 274 Table 2.11 Agricultural holdings by size classes of potato crops and by legal status (01.08.2013- 31.07.2014)………………………………………………………………………………. 278 Table 2.11.1 Agricultural holdings with sown areas of potato by size classes of agricultural landsand by legal status (01.08.2013-31.07.2014.)………………………………………. 282 Table 2.12 Sown areas of potato by size classes and by legal status of agricultural holdings (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)…………………………………………………………............. 286 Table 2.12.1 Sown areas of potato by size classes of agricultural lands andby legal status of agricultural holdings (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)…………………………………………... 290 Table 2.13 Agricultural holdings by size classes of sown areas of vegetable crops and by legal status (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)…………………………………………………………… 294 Table 2.13.1 Agricultural holdings with sown areas of vegetable crops by size classes of agricultural lands and by legal status (01.08.2013- 31.07.2014)………………………......................................................................................... 298 Table 2.14 Sown areas of vegetable crops by size classes and by legal status of agricultural holdings (01.08.2013- 31.07.2014)………………………………………………………...................... 302 Table 2.14.1 Sown areas of vegetable crops by size classes of agricultural lands and by legal status of agricultural holdings (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)………………………………………. 306 Table 2.15 Agricultural holdings by size classes of sown areas of melon crops and by legal status (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)………………………………………………………………… 310 8 Table 2.15.1 Agricultural holdings with sown areas of melon crops by size classes ofagricultural lands and by legal status(01.08.2013- 31.07.2014)………………………………………................................................................. 314 Table 2.16 Sown areas of melon crops by size classes and by legal status of agricultural holdings (01.08.2013-31.07.2014.)………………………………………………………………….. 318 Table 2.16.1 Sown areas of melon crops by size classes of agricultural lands and by legal status of agricultural holdings (01.08.2013-31.07.2014.) …………………………………………. 322 Table 2.17 Agricultural holdings by size classes of sown areas of industrial crops and by legal status (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)…………………………………………………………… 326 Table 2.17.1 Agricultural holdings with sown areas of industrial crops by size classes of agricultural lands and by legal status (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)…………………………. 330 Table 2.18 Sown areas of industrial crops by size classes and by legal status of agricultural holdings (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)……………………………………………………….. 334 Table 2.18.1 Sown areas of industrial crops by size classes of agricultural lands and by legal status of agricultural holdings (01.08.2013-31.07.2014) ………………………………………….. 338 Table 2.19 Agricultural holdings by size classes of sown areas of forage crops and by legal status (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)………………………………………………………………….. 342 Table 2.19.1 Agricultural holdings with sown areas of forage crops by size classes of agricultural lands and by legal status (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)………………………………………. 346 Table 2.20 Sown areas of forage crops by size classes and by legal status of agricultural holdings (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)…………………………………………………………………... 350 Table 2.20.1 Agricultural holdings with sown areas of forage crops by size classes of agricultural lands and by legal status (01.08.2013- 31.07.2014)……………………………………….............................................................. 354 Table 2.21 Flower-growing (except in greenhouses and hothouses) holdings by legal status (01.08.2013-31.07.2014)………………………………………………………………….
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Legends of Nature
    Legends of Nature Protected Areas of the Southern Caucasus ARMENIA Implemented by: 2 Armenia Arevik Dilijan Khosrov Forest Arevik Dilijan Khosrov Forest National Park National Park State Reserve Sunny Mountains – Arevik Beauty in Harmony with Natural Forces and Royal National Park, embedded in Nature - Armenia’s Little Temples – Visitors to Khosrov the catchment of the rivers Switzerland fascinates Forest State Reserve can Meghri, Shvanidzor and with unequalled Caucasian experience the results of Nrnadzor, is one of the woodlands, flowering nature’s elementary forces on youngest protected areas of highland sceneries, curative the shape of the landscape. Armenia. springs and clear lakes. Page 14 Page 10 Page 12 Lake Arpi Sevan Shikahogh Lake Arpi Sevan Shikahogh National Park National Park State Reserve Beauty on the Border – Open Armenia’s “Blue Pearl” – Treasures of Nature – plains, extensive wetlands, Lake Sevan is one of the Shikahogh is one of the few gentle slopes and ever- largest and highest freshwa- places in Armenia where changing seasonal colours ter lakes in the world and a dense pristine broadleaf make Lake Arpi an ideal paradise for birdwatchers. forests have survived. place for birdwatching and Page 18 Page 20 reflection. Page 16 Zangezur & Plane Grove Cross-border Routes Discover fascinating contrasts of Zangezur & Plane Grove Sanctuaries the Caucasus from ice-capped high mountain peaks to subtropi- Plane Grove and Zangezur sanctuaries are famous for their cal landscapes, continental ancient trees and have the potential to develop some of Armenia’s steppes and dense forests. best scenic trails. Two cross-border routes through Page 22 Armenia and Georgia include highlights of protected areas and cultural monuments in the Lesser and Greater Caucasus.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Value-Chains Assessment Report April 2020.Pdf
    1 2 ABOUT THE EUROPEAN UNION The Member States of the European Union have decided to link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms. The European Union is committed to sharing its achievements and its values with countries and peoples beyond its borders. ABOUT THE PUBLICATION: This publication was produced within the framework of the EU Green Agriculture Initiative in Armenia (EU-GAIA) project, which is funded by the European Union (EU) and the Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC), and implemented by the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Armenia. In the framework of the European Union-funded EU-GAIA project, the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) hereby agrees that the reader uses this manual solely for non-commercial purposes. Prepared by: EV Consulting CJSC © 2020 Austrian Development Agency. All rights reserved. Licensed to the European Union under conditions. Yerevan, 2020 3 CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 5 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 6 2. OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT DYNAMICS OF AGRICULTURE IN ARMENIA AND GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES.....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development Project Ideas Goris, Tegh, Gorhayk, Meghri, Vayk
    Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development of the Republic of Armenia DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IDEAS GORIS, TEGH, GORHAYK, MEGHRI, VAYK, JERMUK, ZARITAP, URTSADZOR, NOYEMBERYAN, KOGHB, AYRUM, SARAPAT, AMASIA, ASHOTSK, ARPI Expert Team Varazdat Karapetyan Artyom Grigoryan Artak Dadoyan Gagik Muradyan GIZ Coordinator Armen Keshishyan September 2016 List of Acronyms MTAD Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development ATDF Armenian Territorial Development Fund GIZ German Technical Cooperation LoGoPro GIZ Local Government Programme LSG Local Self-government (bodies) (FY)MDP Five-year Municipal Development Plan PACA Participatory Assessment of Competitive Advantages RDF «Regional Development Foundation» Company LED Local economic development 2 Contents List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ 2 Contents ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Structure of the Report .............................................................................................................. 5 Preamble ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 9 Approaches to Project Implementation ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Management Plan ARM: Water Supply And
    Environmental Management Plan Loan 2860 (SF) Updated in July 2015 ARM: Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project – Additional Financing Improvement of Water Supply Systems in Dilijan Town and Bagratashen, Ptghavan, Zorakan Villages Prepared by the Armenian Water and Sewerage Closed Joint Stock Company (AWSC) for the Asian Development Bank. The environmental management plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. FUNDED BY ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION SECTOR PROJECT - ADDITIONAL FINANCING Date of submission - 13/03/2015 Date of approval - 29/04/2015 Date of revision - 14/07/2015 Subproject V IMPROVEMENT OF TAVUSH REGION WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS L2860-ICB-1-05/3 DILIJAN TOWN AND BAGRATASHEN, PTGHAVAN, ZORAKAN VILLAGES ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATED VERSION Yerevan July, 2015 STATE COMMITTEE OF WATER SYSTEM UNDER THE RA MINISTRY FOR TERRITORIAL GOVERNANCE “ARMWATERSEWERAGE” CJSC FUNDED BY ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION SECTOR PROJECT - ADDITIONAL FINANCING Subproject V IMPROVEMENT OF TAVUSH REGION WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS L2860-ICB-1-05/3 DILIJAN TOWN AND BAGRATASHEN, PTGHAVAN, ZORAKAN VILLAGES BOOK V.3.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN HGSN LLC, Director V.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on Physical Audit of Construction Projects for 2016 “Hayastan” All Armenian Fund
    "NORASHEN" design and technology production cooperative REPORT on physical audit of construction projects for 2016 “Hayastan” All Armenian Fund Yerevan – 2017 Report on physical audit of construction projects of “Hayastan” All-Armenian Fund for 2016 Table of Content Name of the construction project Page REPORT (general provisions) on physical audit of construction projects of “Hayastan” All Armenian Fund for 2016 4 1. Reconstruction works of RA Yerevan city musical school named after P. Tchaykovskiy 7 2. Reconstruction works of RA Armavir region Nalbandyan village secondary school 14 3. Construction of RA Tavush marz Khachardzan village secondary school gym 21 4. Reconstruction works of RA Tavush marz Khachardzan village water supply system 28 5. Construction of RA Tavush marz Baghanis community irrigation system 32 6. Renovation works of RA Tavush marz Kirants, Yenokavan, Lusadzor, Nerqin Tsaghkavan, Sarigyugh, Sevqar communities roads leading to distant pastures 35 7. Construction works of the oncological center in NKR Stepanakert city 39 8. Reconstruction works of the school No. 9 in NKR Stepanakert city and renovation works of the garden 46 9. Construction of NKR Martuni region Sos village 300-seat secondary school 51 10. Construction works of NKR Martakert region Kochoghut village 150-seat assembly house 59 11. Construction of NKR Shushi region Qarin tak village 50-seat kindergarten 66 12. Construction of a house for G. and L. Avanesyans in NKR Martakert region Martakert town 71 13. Construction of a house for I. Hovsepyan and R. Sahakyan in NKRAskeran region Avetaranots village 75 14. Construction of a house for T. and M. Baghdasaryans in NKR Martuni region Chartar village 78 15.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Status and Distribution of Thrush Nightingale Luscinia Luscinia and Common Nightingale L
    Sandgrouse31-090402:Sandgrouse 4/2/2009 11:21 AM Page 18 On the status and distribution of Thrush Nightingale Luscinia luscinia and Common Nightingale L. megarhynchos in Armenia VASIL ANANIAN INTRODUCTION In the key references on the avifauna of the Western Palearctic and former Soviet Union, the breeding distributions of Common Luscinia megarhynchos and Thrush Nightingales L. luscinia in the Transcaucasus (Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan) are presented inconsistently, especially for the latter species. These sources disagree on the status of Thrush Nightingale in the area, thus Vaurie (1959), Cramp (1988) and Snow & Perrins (1998) considered it breeding in the Transcaucasus, while Dementiev & Gladkov (1954), Sibley & Monroe (1990) and Stepanyan (2003) do not. Its distribu- tion in del Hoyo et al (2005) is mapped according to the latter view, but they note the species’ presence in Armenia during the breeding season. Several other publications Plate 1. Common Nightingale Luscinia megarhynchos performing full territorial song, Vorotan river gorge, c15 consider that the southern limit of Thrush km SSW of Goris town, Syunik province, Armenia, 12 May Nightingale’s Caucasian breeding range is 2005. © Vasil Ananian in the northern foothills of the Greater Caucasus mountains (Russian Federation), while the Transcaucasus is inhabited solely by Common Nightingale (Gladkov et al 1964, Flint et al 1967, Ivanov & Stegmann 1978, Vtorov & Drozdov 1980). Thrush Nightingale in Azerbaijan was classified as ‘accidental’ by Patrikeev (2004). The author accepted that the species had possibly nested in the past and referred to old summer records by GI Radde from the Karayasi forest in the Kura–Aras (Arax) lowlands, but Patrikeev found only Common Nightingale there in the late 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction
    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Submitted to the Central European University, Department
    A thesis submitted to the Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy of Central European University in part fulfilment of the Degree of Master of Science Protected areas and tourism development: Case of the Dilijan National Park, Armenia CEU eTD Collection Anahit AGHABABYAN July, 2009 Budapest 1 Notes on copyright and the ownership of intellectual property rights: (1) Copyright in text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies (by any process) either in full, or of extracts, may be made only in accordance with instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European University Library. Details may be obtained from the Librarian. This page must form part of any such copies made. Further copies (by any process) of copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the permission (in writing) of the Author. (2) The ownership of any intellectual property rights which may be described in this thesis is vested in the Central European University, subject to any prior agreement to the contrary, and may not be made available for use by third parties without the written permission of the University, which will prescribe the terms and conditions of any such agreement. (3) For bibliographic and reference purposes this thesis should be referred to as: Aghababyan, A. 2009. Protected areas and tourism development: Case of the Dilijan National Park, Armenia. Master of Science thesis, Central European University, Budapest. Further information on the conditions under which disclosures and exploitation may take place is available from the Head of the Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Central European University.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiplying Our Success ANNUAL REPORT 2 0 1 6 Children of Armenia Fund ■ Annual Report Children of Armenia Fund ■ Annual Report
    Multiplying Our Success ANNUAL REPORT 2 0 1 6 Children of Armenia Fund ■ Annual Report Children of Armenia Fund ■ Annual Report CONTENTS Chairman’s Letter 5 Our Mission 7 2016 at a Glance 8 Geographies Served 10 COAF Programs 13 Education 14 Healthcare 16 Child & Family Support 18 Community & Infrastructure 20 Statistics 22 Our Supporters 24 Board & Leadership 26 Our Team 28 Financials & Charts 30 2 3 Children of Armenia Fund ■ Annual Report Children of Armenia Fund ■ Annual Report CHAIRMAN’S LETTER t is with great joy and help of our medical professionals, gratitude that I share our 2016 we successfully instituted dozens of Iaccomplishments. medical, dental and mental health programs benefitting children and 2016 has been a transformative their families. year for COAF. We started the implementation of our SMART Thirteen years ago, I founded programs in six villages and the Children of Armenia Fund to commenced the construction of our improve every aspect of life in our SMART campus. The SMART model village communities populated with is designed to bring remote village high-potential young people. We communities to the world’s stage use education as our springboard for through education and technology. success, we have found opportunity We expect our SMART model to amidst tragedy, growth amidst make sustainable improvements destruction and hope amidst what across all areas of rural Armenian would have been an undefined life. Today, a total of six SMART future. Rooms and two SMART Safe Rooms Today in 2017, we celebrate are fully operational, providing our commitment with the first access to the latest technologies generation of COAF graduates, a and serving as an oasis of education generation of healthy, educated, and entrepreneurship.
    [Show full text]
  • Report SEIA Final with Annexes Zip.Indd
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK IN ARMENIAN COMMUNITIES ARMENIA 2020 2020 SEIA REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary ......................................................................................................................................................................8 SEIA Results at a Glance ............................................................................................................................................................10 Impact of COVID-19 on Armenia’s marzes and communities ...........................................................................................12 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................................14 Background ...............................................................................................................................................................................14 SEIA objectives and approach .............................................................................................................................................16 Methodology .............................................................................................................................................................................18 Part 1. Key Socio-Economic Development Trends in Armenia Prior to the COVID-19 Outbreak ............................20 Part 2. Assessment of COVID-19’s Immediate Impact
    [Show full text]
  • A Potential Afforestation Scenario of the Getik River Basin
    Project Paper Drivers of Forest Cover Developments in Armenia: A Potential Afforestation Scenario of the Getik River Basin Maximilian Schulte Aghavni Harutyunyan M.Sc. Bioeconomy M.Sc. Geography University of Hohenheim American University of Armenia, [email protected] [email protected] January 2020 This project is a part of the DAAD-funded collaboration, GAtES (German-Armenian Network on the Advancement of Public Participation GIS for Ecosystem Services as a Means for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Development), between the University of Hohenheim (UHOH) and the American University of Armenia’s (AUA) Acopian Center for the Environment. Contents List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................. II List of Tables .................................................................................................................................................. III List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ III 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Materials & Methods..................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Scenario Technique ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia Housing Study Prepared By: Hayastan Stepanyan, Legal Expert, UFSD and Armen Varosyan, Housing Expert, UFSD Contents
    Armenia Housing Study Prepared by: Hayastan Stepanyan, legal expert, UFSD and Armen Varosyan, housing expert, UFSD Contents Foreword ________________________________________________________________________________ 4 n stei ll Acknowledgements _______________________________________________________________________ 5 I m RA Executive summary _______________________________________________________________________ 6 z E Introduction and methodology _____________________________________________________________ 9 Context analysis Background information on the Republic of Armenia _______________________________________ 10 Housing stock of Armenia before independence ____________________________________________ 11 Housing situation after independence _____________________________________________________13 Condition of current housing stock in Armenia _____________________________________________15 Vulnerable groups in Armenia lacking access to decent housing _____________________________16 Housing analysis The property rights regime _______________________________________________________________17 The housing finance regime ______________________________________________________________ 19 The housing subsidies regime ____________________________________________________________21 Residential infrastructure _________________________________________________________________23 The regulatory regime ___________________________________________________________________26 Position statement and recommendations Property rights recommendations _________________________________________________________30
    [Show full text]