DOCSLIB.ORG

Chiricahua Firescape Draft Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chiricahua Firescape Draft Environmental Assessment United States Department of Agriculture Chiricahua FireScape Draft Environmental Assessment Forest Service Coronado National Forest Douglas Ranger District September 2018 For More Information Contact: Renee Kuehner Fire Management Officer 1192 West Saddleview Road Douglas, AZ 85607 520-388-8448 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632- 9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. Chiricahua FireScape DRAFT Environmental Assessment Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................................................. 1 Location of the Proposed Project Area ....................................................................................... 1 Need for the Proposal ...................................................................................................................... 2 Management Direction ................................................................................................................ 3 Agencies and Persons Consulted ..................................................................................................... 3 Public Involvement ..................................................................................................................... 4 Proposed Action and Alternatives ................................................................................................... 4 No Action .................................................................................................................................... 4 Proposed Action .......................................................................................................................... 5 Description of Proposed Treatments ....................................................................................... 5 Treatment Units ....................................................................................................................... 8 Project Design Features ........................................................................................................... 9 Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action and Alternatives................................................. 11 Past, Present and Reasonably Foreseeable Actions .................................................................. 11 Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................... 13 Fire and Fuels ............................................................................................................................ 14 Range ........................................................................................................................................ 16 Recreation and Wilderness ........................................................................................................ 21 Scenery ...................................................................................................................................... 27 Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species ....................................................................... 29 Vegetation ................................................................................................................................. 36 Watershed.................................................................................................................................. 40 Appendix A – Design Features ...................................................................................................... 47 Appendix B – Maps ....................................................................................................................... 58 List of Tables Table 1. Chiricahua FireScape proposed vegetation treatments ...................................................... 9 Table 2. Past, present, and reasonably foreseeable actions ........................................................... 12 Table 3. Allotment size and current management of the grazing allotments on the project area, Douglas Ranger District. Permitted use is shown in both numbers of livestock and animal unit months (AUMs). ............................................................................................................ 16 Table 4. Summary of determinations for threatened and endangered species............................... 29 Table 5. Summary of effects to Forest Service sensitive species. ................................................. 33 Table 6. Coronado National Forest management indicator species that may occur within the project area ............................................................................................................................ 35 Table 7. Design features for the Chiricahua FireScape Project organized by resource ................. 47 List of Figures Figure 1. Project area vicinity map .................................................................................................. 2 Figure 2. Acres of Treatment Type by Slope Percent ................................................................... 42 i Chiricahua FireScape DRAFT Environmental Assessment List of Maps Map 1. Treatment units in the Chiricahua FireScape project area ................................................ 59 Map 2. Chiricahua FireScape treatments for Bruno unit ............................................................... 59 Map 3. Chiricahua FireScape treatments for Cave Creek unit ...................................................... 59 Map 4. Chiricahua FireScape treatments for Cochise Head unit ................................................... 59 Map 5. Chiricahua FireScape treatments for Jackwood unit ......................................................... 59 Map 6. Chiricahua FireScape treatments for John Long unit ........................................................ 59 Map 7. Chiricahua FireScape treatments for Limestone unit ........................................................ 59 Map 8. Chiricahua FireScape treatments for Onion unit ............................................................... 59 Map 9. Chiricahua FireScape treatments for Packsaddle unit ....................................................... 59 Map 10. Chiricahua FireScape treatments for Pine Canyon unit .................................................. 59 Map 11. Chiricahua FireScape treatments for Pinery unit ............................................................ 59 Map 12. Chiricahua FireScape treatments for Price Canyon unit ................................................. 59 Map 13. Chiricahua FireScape treatments for Rough Mountain unit ............................................ 59 Map 14. Chiricahua FireScape treatments for Rucker unit ........................................................... 59 Map 15. Chiricahua FireScape treatments for Rustler Park unit ................................................... 59 Map 16. Chiricahua FireScape treatments for Silver Peak unit ..................................................... 59 Map 17. Chiricahua FireScape treatments for Turkey Creek unit ................................................. 59 ii Chiricahua FireScape DRAFT Environmental Assessment Introduction We are proposing to implement ecosystem restoration treatments, including hand thinning, mechanical treatments, wildland fire (planned and unplanned), and selective herbicide use on National Forest System lands on approximately 140,000 acres of the Douglas Ranger District of the Coronado National Forest. We prepared this environmental assessment to determine whether effects of the proposed activities may be significant enough to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FINAL REPORT Pines Vs
    FINAL REPORT Pines vs. Oaks Revisited: Forest Type Conversion Due to High-severity Fire in Madrean Woodlands JFSP PROJECT ID: 15-1-07-22 December 2017 Andrew M. Barton University of Maine at Farmington Helen M. Poulos Wesleyan University Graeme P. Berlyn Yale University The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. ii Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................1 Objectives ........................................................................................................................................2 Background ......................................................................................................................................3 Materials and Methods .....................................................................................................................4 Study System .............................................................................................................................4 Climate and Fire Patterns in Southeastern Arizona ...................................................................6 Plot Sampling Design ................................................................................................................6 Plot
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest Draft Land and Resource Management Plan I Contents
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Coronado National Forest Southwestern Region Draft Land and Resource MB-R3-05-7 October 2013 Management Plan Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona, and Hidalgo County, New Mexico The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Front cover photos (clockwise from upper left): Meadow Valley in the Huachuca Ecosystem Management Area; saguaros in the Galiuro Mountains; deer herd; aspen on Mt. Lemmon; Riggs Lake; Dragoon Mountains; Santa Rita Mountains “sky island”; San Rafael grasslands; historic building in Cave Creek Canyon; golden columbine flowers; and camping at Rose Canyon Campground. Printed on recycled paper • October 2013 Draft Land and Resource Management Plan Coronado National Forest Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona Hidalgo County, New Mexico Responsible Official: Regional Forester Southwestern Region 333 Broadway Boulevard, SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 842-3292 For Information Contact: Forest Planner Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress, FB 42 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 388-8300 TTY 711 [email protected] Contents Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chiricahua Apache from 1886-1914, 35 Am
    American Indian Law Review Volume 35 | Number 1 1-1-2010 Values in Transition: The hirC icahua Apache from 1886-1914 John W. Ragsdale Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/ailr Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, Indigenous Studies Commons, Other History Commons, Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation John W. Ragsdale Jr., Values in Transition: The Chiricahua Apache from 1886-1914, 35 Am. Indian L. Rev. (2010), https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/ailr/vol35/iss1/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VALUES IN TRANSITION: THE CHIRICAHUA APACHE FROM 1886-1914 John W Ragsdale, Jr.* Abstract Law confirms but seldom determines the course of a society. Values and beliefs, instead, are the true polestars, incrementally implemented by the laws, customs, and policies. The Chiricahua Apache, a tribal society of hunters, gatherers, and raiders in the mountains and deserts of the Southwest, were squeezed between the growing populations and economies of the United States and Mexico. Raiding brought response, reprisal, and ultimately confinement at the loathsome San Carlos Reservation. Though most Chiricahua submitted to the beginnings of assimilation, a number of the hardiest and least malleable did not. Periodic breakouts, wild raids through New Mexico and Arizona, and a labyrinthian, nearly impenetrable sanctuary in the Sierra Madre led the United States to an extraordinary and unprincipled overreaction.
    [Show full text]
  • WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT AREA Transportation Analysis Plan
    CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT AREA Transportation Analysis Plan March 2011 Edited By ELI CURIEL JR. ID Core Team Leader Approved By /C/ Annette H. Chavez March 4, 2011 Annette H. Chavez, Sierra Vista District Ranger Date Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 1 STEP 1 – SETTING UP THE ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................... 3 STEP 2- DESCRIBING THE SITUATION ....................................................................................................... 5 TABLE 2.1 – EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ......................................................................................... 7 TABLE 2.2 - EXISTING ROAD CLASSIFICATIONS ............................................................................................ 13 STEP 3- IDENTIFYING ISSUES ..................................................................................................................... 13 STEP 4- ASSESSING BENEFITS, PROBLEMS AND RISKS OF THE EXISTING ROAD SYSTEM ... 21 LANDS .............................................................................................................................................................. 22 SOIL, WATER, AIR, AND FORESTRY ............................................................................................................... 31 Figure 4.1 Whetstone Watershed
    [Show full text]
  • CHIRICAHUA LEOPARD FROG (Lithobates [Rana] Chiricahuensis)
    CHIRICAHUA LEOPARD FROG (Lithobates [Rana] chiricahuensis) Chiricahua Leopard Frog from Sycamore Canyon, Coronado National Forest, Arizona Photograph by Jim Rorabaugh, USFWS CONSIDERATIONS FOR MAKING EFFECTS DETERMINATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REDUCING AND AVOIDING ADVERSE EFFECTS Developed by the Southwest Endangered Species Act Team, an affiliate of the Southwest Strategy Funded by U.S. Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program December 2008 (Updated August 31, 2009) ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This document was developed by members of the Southwest Endangered Species Act (SWESA) Team comprised of representatives from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (BoR), Department of Defense (DoD), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Forest Service (USFS), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), National Park Service (NPS) and U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). Dr. Terry L. Myers gathered and synthesized much of the information for this document. The SWESA Team would especially like to thank Mr. Steve Sekscienski, U.S. Army Environmental Center, DoD, for obtaining the funds needed for this project, and Dr. Patricia Zenone, USFWS, New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office, for serving as the Contracting Officer’s Representative for this grant. Overall guidance, review, and editing of the document was provided by the CMED Subgroup of the SWESA Team, consisting of: Art Coykendall (BoR), John Nystedt (USFWS), Patricia Zenone (USFWS), Robert L. Palmer (DoD, U.S. Navy), Vicki Herren (BLM), Wade Eakle (USACE), and Ronnie Maes (USFS). The cooperation of many individuals facilitated this effort, including: USFWS: Jim Rorabaugh, Jennifer Graves, Debra Bills, Shaula Hedwall, Melissa Kreutzian, Marilyn Myers, Michelle Christman, Joel Lusk, Harold Namminga; USFS: Mike Rotonda, Susan Lee, Bryce Rickel, Linda WhiteTrifaro; USACE: Ron Fowler, Robert Dummer; BLM: Ted Cordery, Marikay Ramsey; BoR: Robert Clarkson; DoD, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro
    UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA AGRARIA ANTONIO NARRO DIVISIÓN DE AGRONOMÍA Pinus arizonica Engelm. PRESENTA: SERGIO AMILCAR CANUL TUN MONOGRAFÍA Presentada como requisito parcial para Obtener el título de: INGENIERO FORESTAL Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, México Mayo de 2005 UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA AGRARIA ANTONIO NARRO DIVISIÓN DE AGRONOMÍA DEPARTAMENTO FORESTAL Pinus arizonica Engelm. MONOGRAFÍA Que somete a consideración del H. Jurado calificador como requisito parcial para obtener el título de: INGENIERO FORESTAL PRESENTA SERGIO AMILCAR CANUL TUN APROBADA PRESIDENTE DEL JURADO COORDINADOR DE LA DIVISIÓN DE AGRONOMÍA _____________________________ ________________________________ M. C. CELESTINO FLORES LÓPEZ M. C. ARNOLDO OYERVIDES GARCÍA Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, México Mayo de 2005 UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA AGRARIA ANTONIO NARRO DIVISIÓN DE AGRONOMÍA DEPARTAMENTO FORESTAL Pinus arizonica Engelm. MONOGRAFÍA Que somete a consideración del H. Jurado calificador como requisito parcial para obtener el título de: INGENIERO FORESTAL PRESENTA SERGIO AMILCAR CANUL TUN PRESIDENTE DEL JURADO _____________________________ M. C. CELESTINO FLORES LÓPEZ PRIMER SINODAL SEGUNDO SINODAL _______________________________ ___________________________________ Dr. MIGUEL ÁNGEL CAPÓ ARTEAGA Dr. JOSÉ ÁNGEL VILLARREAL QUINTANILLA Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, México Mayo de 2005 DEDICATORIA A mis grandes amores: Leydi Abigail Cob Chan Nayvi Abisai Canul Cob Por haber llegado a mi vida y formar parte de mi, son un gran motivo para triunfar y salir adelante en medio de una gran tempestad. A mis padres: Ramón Cruz Canul Vázquez Lucila Tún Cahuich. Por su gran sacrificio realizado, por la confianza que me brindaron y por ser mis mejores amigos. Siempre tuve sus consejos, ayuda en el momento más crítico y comprensión. A mis hermanos: Claudio Ezequiel, por aceptar ser mi amigo, por su compañía y apoyo durante mi carrera y en este trabajo.
    [Show full text]
  • Stories of the Sky Islands: Exhibit Development Resource Guide for Biology and Geology at Chiricahua National Monument and Coronado National Memorial
    Stories of the Sky Islands: Exhibit Development Resource Guide for Biology and Geology at Chiricahua National Monument and Coronado National Memorial Prepared for the National Park Service under terms of Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Agreement H1200-05-0003 Task Agreement J8680090020 Prepared by Adam M. Hudson,1 J. Jesse Minor,2,3 Erin E. Posthumus4 In cooperation with the Arizona State Museum The University of Arizona Tucson, AZ Beth Grindell, Principal Investigator May 17, 2013 1: Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona ([email protected]) 2: School of Geography and Development, University of Arizona ([email protected]) 3: Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona 4: School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona ([email protected]) Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................3 Beth Grindell, Ph.D. Ch. 1: Current research and information for exhibit development on the geology of Chiricahua National Monument and Coronado National Memorial, Southeast Arizona, USA..................................................................................................................................... 5 Adam M. Hudson, M.S. Section 1: Geologic Time and the Geologic Time Scale ..................................................5 Section 2: Plate Tectonic Evolution and Geologic History of Southeast Arizona .........11 Section 3: Park-specific Geologic History – Chiricahua
    [Show full text]
  • Degree of Hybridization in Seed Stands of Pinus Engelmannii Carr
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Degree of Hybridization in Seed Stands of Pinus engelmannii Carr. In the Sierra Madre Occidental, Durango, Mexico Israel Jaime Ávila-Flores1, José Ciro Hernández-Díaz2, Maria Socorro González-Elizondo3, José Ángel Prieto-Ruíz4, Christian Wehenkel2* 1 Doctorado Institucional en Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Apdo, Postal 741, Zona Centro, Durango, Durango, México, C.P., 34000, 2 Instituto de Silvicultura e Industria de la Madera, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Apdo, Postal 741, Zona Centro, Durango, Durango, México, C.P., 34000, 3 CIIDIR Unidad Durango, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Sigma 119 Fracc, 20 de Noviembre II, Durango, Durango, México, C.P., 34220, 4 Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Blv. Durango y Ave, Papaloapan s/n. Col. Valle del Sur, Durango, Durango, México, C.P., 34120 * [email protected] Abstract Hybridization is an important evolutionary force, because interspecific gene transfer can introduce more new genetic material than is directly generated by mutations. Pinus engel- OPEN ACCESS mannii Carr. is one of the nine most common pine species in the pine-oak forest ecoregion Citation: Ávila-Flores IJ, Hernández-Díaz JC, in the state of Durango, Mexico. This species is widely harvested for lumber and is also González-Elizondo MS, Prieto-Ruíz JÁ, Wehenkel C used in reforestation programmes. Interspecific hybrids between P.engelmannii and Pinus (2016) Degree of Hybridization in Seed Stands of arizonica Engelm. have been detected by morphological analysis. The presence of hybrids Pinus engelmannii Carr. In the Sierra Madre in P. engelmannii seed stands may affect seed quality and reforestation success.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Change at Kartchner Caverns: Trying to Separate Natural and Anthropogenic Changes
    Environmental Change at Kartchner Caverns: Trying to Separate Natural and Anthropogenic Changes Rickard S. Toomey, III, and Ginger Nolan Kartchner Caverns State Park, Arizona State Parks, Benson, AZ Abstract—Cave temperature and moisture levels are important factors in the environmental health of Kartchner Caverns. Monitoring indicates the cave has warmed and moisture levels have fallen over the past 14 years. Timing and patterns of change within the cave suggest that changes are due to development as a show cave. However, changes in other caves, surface temperature and precipitation, and in shallow local aquifers suggest that cave changes relate to regional patterns. Changes at Kartchner Caverns represent a combination of anthropogenic and regional natural causes. Separating these different factors is an important on-going goal in protecting the cave. Kartchner Caverns State Park (KCSP) is a show cave in The primary long-term temperature and humidity data southeastern Arizona. The cave was discovered in 1974 and from the cave come from Environmental Monitoring Stations became a State Park in 1988 (Tufts and Tenen 1999). After (EMS) within the cave (figure 1). These are locations at pre-development studies to assess the condition of the cave, which air, water, and soil temperature, relative humidity, to establish baseline data, and to determine how best to de- and pan evaporation are measured manually on a periodic velop the cave, Arizona State Parks began development of basis, usually weekly or monthly. Temperatures are measured the cave for ecological education and tourism. The develop- with small, digital probe thermometers; relative humidity is ment included creating tunnel entrances to the cave, building measured using a digital probe thermometer equipped as a trails for tours, and installing a lighting system.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest
    CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST FIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN Reviewed and Updated by _/s/ Chris Stetson ___________ Date __5/18/10 __________ Coronado Fire Management Plan Interagency Federal fire policy requires that every area with burnable vegetation must have a Fire Management Plan (FMP). This FMP provides information concerning the fire process for the Coronado National Forest and compiles guidance from existing sources such as but not limited to, the Coronado National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP), national policy, and national and regional directives. The potential consequences to firefighter and public safety and welfare, natural and cultural resources, and values to be protected help determine the management response to wildfire. Firefighter and public safety are the first consideration and are always the priority during every response to wildfire. The following chapters discuss broad forest and specific Fire Management Unit (FMU) characteristics and guidance. Chapter 1 introduces the area covered by the FMP, includes a map of the Coronado National Forest, addresses the agencies involved, and states why the forest is developing the FMP. Chapter 2 establishes the link between higher-level planning documents, legislation, and policies and the actions described in FMP. Chapter 3 articulates specific goals, objectives, standards, guidelines, and/or desired future condition(s), as established in the forest’s LRMP, which apply to all the forest’s FMUs and those that are unique to the forest’s individual FMUs. Page 1 of 30 Coronado Fire Management Plan Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION The Coronado National Forest developed this FMP as a decision support tool to help fire personnel and decision makers determine the response to an unplanned ignition.
    [Show full text]
  • You Can Learn More About the Chiricahuas
    Douglas RANGER DISTRICT www.skyislandaction.org 2-1 State of the Coronado Forest DRAFT 11.05.08 DRAFT 11.05.08 State of the Coronado Forest 2-2 www.skyislandaction.org CHAPTER 2 Chiricahua Ecosystem Management Area The Chiricahua Mountain Range, located in the Natural History southeastern corner of the Coronado National Forest, The Chiricahua Mountains are known for their is one of the largest Sky Islands in the U.S. portion of amazing variety of terrestrial plants, animals, and the Sky Island region. The range is approximately 40 invertebrates. They contain exceptional examples of miles long by 20 miles wide with elevations ranging ecosystems that are rare in southern Arizona. While from 4,400 to 9,759 feet at the summit of Chiricahua the range covers only 0.5% of the total land area in Peak. The Chiricahua Ecosystem Management Area Arizona, it contains 30% of plant species found in (EMA) is the largest Management Area on the Forest Arizona, and almost 50% of all bird species that encompassing 291,492 acres of the Chiricahua and regularly occur in the United States.1 The Chiricahuas Pedragosa Mountains. form part of a chain of mountains spanning from Protected by remoteness, the Chiricahuas remain central Mexico into southern Arizona. Because of one of the less visited ranges on the Coronado their proximity to the Sierra Madre, they support a National Forest. Formerly surrounded only by great diversity of wildlife found nowhere else in the ranches, the effects of Arizona’s explosive 21st century United States such as the Mexican Chickadee, whose population growth are beginning to reach the flanks only known breeding locations in the country are in of the Chiricahuas.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior
    Vol. 77 Tuesday, No. 54 March 20, 2012 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing and Designation of Critical Habitat for the Chiricahua Leopard Frog; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:12 Mar 19, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\20MRR2.SGM 20MRR2 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES2 16324 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 20, 2012 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Background submitting the critical habitat rules to the Federal Register. Fish and Wildlife Service It is our intent to discuss in this final We published a proposed rule to rule only those topics directly relevant reassess the listing status and propose 50 CFR Part 17 to the listing and development and critical habitat for the Chiricahua designation of critical habitat for the leopard frog in the Federal Register on [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2010– Chiricahua leopard frog under the Act 0085;4500030114] March 15, 2011 (76 FR 14126) with a (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). For more request for public comments. On RIN 1018–AX12 information on the biology and ecology September 21, 2011, we made available of the Chiricahua leopard frog refer to the draft environmental assessment and Endangered and Threatened Wildlife the final listing rule (67 FR 40790; June draft economic analysis for the and Plants; Listing and Designation of 13, 2002) or our April 2007 final proposed designation of critical habitat Critical Habitat for the Chiricahua recovery plan, which are available from and reopened the public comment on Leopard Frog the Arizona Ecological Services Field the proposed rule (76 FR 58441).
    [Show full text]