DOCSLIB.ORG

Selected Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Selected Bibliography Selected Bibliography Accarisius, J. 1637. Terrae quies, solisque motus demonstratus primum theologicis, tum plurimis philosophicis rationibus. Rome. Accattoli, L. 1990. Tutti d’accordo su Galileo. Corriere della sera, 30 March, 15. Acloque, P. 1982. L’histoire des expériences pour la mise en évidence du mouvement de la Terre. Cahiers d’Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences, new series, no. 4, 1–141. Adams, J.Q. 1843. An oration, delivered before the Cincinnati Astronomical Society. Cincinnati. Agassi, J. 1957. Duhem versus Galileo. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8: 237–248. Agassi, J. 1971. On explaining the trial of Galileo. Organon 8: 137–166. Albèri, E. (ed). 1842–1856. Le opere di Galileo Galilei, 15 tomes in 16 vols. Florence. Andres, G. 1776. Saggio della filosofia del Galileo. Mantua. Anfossi, F. 1820. Le fisiche rivoluzioni della natura o la palingenesi filosofica di Carlo Bonnet convinta di errore. 2nd edn. Rome. Anfossi, F. 1822. Se possa difendersi, ed insegnare, non come semplice ipotesi, ma come verissima e come tesi, la mobilità della terra, e la stabilità del sole da chi ha fatta la professione di fede di Pio IV. Rome. Angeli, S. degli. 1667. Considerationi sopra la forza di alcune ragioni fisico mattematiche. Venice. Angeli, S. degli. 1668a. Seconde considerationi sopra la forza dell’argomento fisico mattematico del M. Rev. P. Gio. Battista Riccioli. Padua. Angeli, S. degli. 1668b. Terze considerationi sopra una lettera del molto illustre et eccellentissimo Signor Gio. Alfonso Borelli. Venice. Angeli, S. degli. 1669. Quarte considerationi sopra la confermatione d’una sentenza del Sig. Gio. Alfonso Borelli. Padua. Anonymous. 1615. Judicium de epistola F. Pauli Foscarini de mobilitate Terrae. Now in Biblioteca Corsiniana, Rome. Anonymous. 1882. Judicium de epistola F. Pauli Foscarini de mobilitate Terrae. In Berti 1882, 72–73. Anonymous. 1991. An Unidentified Theologian’s Censure of Foscarini’s Letter. In Blackwell 1991, 253–254. Argoli, A. 1644. Pandosium sphaericum, in quo singula in elementaribus regionibus, aetque aetherea, mathematice pertractantur. Padua. Ariew, R. 1987. The phases of Venus before 1610. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18: 81–92. Ariew, R., and D. Garber, trans and eds. 1989. Philosophical essays [of Leibniz]. Indianapolis: Hackett. Arnauld, A. 1775–1783. Oeuvres de Messire Antoine Arnauld, 49 vols. Paris. Artigas, M., and M. Sánchez de Toca. 2008. Galileo y el Vaticano. Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos. Atti del convegno di studio su Pio Paschini nel centenario della nascita, 1878–1978. 1979. Udine: Pubblicazioni della Deputazione di Storia Patria per il Friuli. 316 Selected Bibliography Auzout, A. 1665. Lettre a Monsieur l’Abbé Charles. Paris. Rpt. in Memoires de l’Academie Royale des Sciences, depuis 1666 jusqu’à 1699, vol. 7, pt. 1, 1–68, Paris, 1729–1733. Baldini, U. 1996a. La formazione scientifica di G.B. Riccioli. In Pepe 1996a, 123–182. Baldini, U. 1996b. Sul contesto storico e scientifico del caso Settele. In Giornata galileiana 1996, 21–58. Baldini, U. 2000. Saggi sulla cultura della Compagnia di Gesù (secoli XVI–XVIII). Padua: CLEUP. Baldini, U., and G.V. Coyne (eds). 1984. The Louvain lectures (Lectiones Lovanienses) of Bellarmine and the autograph copy of his 1616 Declaration to Galileo. Vatican City: Specola Vaticana. Baldini, U. and L. Spruit. 2001. Nuovi documenti galileiani degli archivi del Sant’Ufficio e dell’Indice. Rivista di Storia della filosofia 56: 661–699. Baliani, G.B. 1638. De motu naturali gravium solidorum. Genoa. Baliani, G.B. 1646. De motu naturali gravium solidorum et liquidorum. Genoa. Barbier, A.A. 1811. Report to Napoleon Bonaparte, 12 March. In Favaro 1887, 198. Barbier, A.A. 1812. Letter to the Minister of Religions, 16 October. In Favaro 1887, 200. Barbier, A.A. 1814a. Letter to Count de Blacas, 5 December. In Favaro 1887, 204. Barbier, A.A. 1814b. Letter to Count de Blacas, 16 December. In Favaro 1887, 208. Baretti, G. 1757. The Italian Library. London. Barker, P. and B.R. Goldstein. 1998. Realism and instrumentalism in sixteenth-century astronomy. Perspectives on Science 6: 232–258. Barni, J. 1862. Les martyrs de la libre pensée. Geneva. Basile, B. 1983. Galileo e il teologo ‘copernicano’ Paolo Antonio Foscarini. Rivista di letteratura italiana 1: 63–96. Basile, B. 1987. Galilei e il teologo Foscarini. In idem, L’invenzione del vero. Roma: Salerno. Beltrán Marí, A., trans and ed. 1994. Diálogo sobre los dos máximos sistemas del mundo, ptole- maico y copernicano. Madrid: Alianza Editorial. Beltrán Marí, A. 1998. ‘Una reflexión serena y objectiva’. Arbor 160(629): 69–108. Beltrán Marí, A. 2001a. Galileo, ciencia y religión. Barcelona: Paidós. Beltrán Marí, A. 2001b. Tratos extrajudiciales, determinismo procesal y poder. In Montesinos and Solís 2001, 463–490. Beltrán Marí, A. 2006. Talento y poder: Historia de las relaciones entre Galileo y la Iglesia católica. Pamplona: Laetoli. Bemis, S.F. 1956. John Quincy Adams and the Union. New York: Knopf. Benítez, H.H. 1999. Ensayos sobre ciencia y religión. Santiago, Chile: Bravo y Allende. Bentley, E. (ed). 1966a. Bertolt Brecht, Galileo. New York: Grove. Bentley, E. 1966b. Introduction. In Bentley 1966a, 7–42. Bérault-Bercastel, A.H. de. 1778–1790. Histoire de l’Eglise, 24 vols. Paris. Beretta, F. 1998. Galilée devant le tribunal de l’Inquisition. Doctoral Dissertation, Faculty of Theology, University of Fribourg, Switzerland. Beretta, F. 1999a. Le procès de Galilée et les archives du Saint-Office. Revue des sciences philoso- phiques et théologiques 83: 441–490. Beretta, F. 1999b. La Siège Apostolique et l’affaire Galilée. Roma moderna e contemporanea 7: 421–461. Beretta, F. 1999c. De l’inerrance absolue à la vérité salvifique de l’Écriture. Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 46: 461–501. Beretta, F. 2000. L’archivio della Congregazione del Sant’Ufficio. In Del Col and Paolin 2000, 119–144; rpt. in Beretta 2001e. Beretta, F. 2001a. Urbain VIII Barberini protagoniste de la condamnation de Galilée. In Montesinos and Solís 2001, 549–574. Beretta, F. 2001b. ‘Omnibus christianae, catholicae philosophiae amantibus, D.D.’ Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 48: 301–325. Beretta, F. 2001c. Un nuovo documento sul processo di Galileo Galilei. Nuncius 16: 629–641. Selected Bibliography 317 Beretta, F. 2001d. Giordano Bruno e l’Inquisizione romana. Bruniana & Campanelliana 7: 15–49. Beretta, F. 2001e. L’archivio della Congregazione del Sant’Ufficio. Rivista di storia e letteratura religiosa 37: 29–58. Beretta, F. 2001f. Galileo Galilei und die römische Inquisition (1616–1633). In Wolf 2001, 141–158. Beretta, F. 2003a. L’affaire Galilée et l’impasse apologétique. Gregorianum 84: 169–192. Beretta, F. 2003b. Une deuxième abjuration de Galilée, ou l’inaltérable hiérarchie des disciplines. Bruniana & Campanelliana 9: 9–43. Beretta, F. 2004. Rilettura di un documento celebre. Galilaeana 1: 91–115. Beretta, F. 2005a. The documents of Galileo’s trial. In McMullin 2005a, 191–212. Beretta, F. 2005b. Galileo, Urban VIII, and the prosecution of natural philosophers. In McMullin 2005a, 234–261. Beretta, F. (ed). 2005c. Galilée en procès, Galilée réhabilité? Saint-Maurice: Éditions Saint- Augustin. Beretta, F., and M.-P. Lerner. 2006. Un édit inédit: Autour du placard de mise à l’Index de Copernic par le Maître du Sacre Palais Giacinto Petroni. Galilaeana 3: 199–216. Berggren, L., and L. Sjöstedt. 1996. L’ombra dei grandi. Rome: Artemide Edizioni. Bergier, N.S. 1788–1790a. Galilée. Rpt. in Bergier 1823, vol. 3, column 465. Bergier, N.S. 1788–1790b. Sciences humaines. Rpt. in Bergier 1823, 7: 365–370. Bergier, N.S. 1823. Dictionnaire de Théologie, 8 vols. Toulouse. Bernini [or Bernino], D. 1709. Historia di tutte l’heresie, vol. 4. Rome. Berti, D. 1876a. Copernico e le vicende del sistema copernicano in Italia. Rome. Berti, D. 1876b. Il processo originale di Galileo Galilei pubblicato per la prima volta. Rome. Berti, D. 1877. La critica moderna e il processo di Galileo Galilei. Nuova antologia di scienze, letter ed arti, year 12, 2nd series, vol. 4, 5–34. Berti, D. 1878. Il processo originale di Galileo Galilei: Nuova edizione accresciuta, corretta e preceduta da un’avvertenza. Rome. Berti, D. 1882. Antecedenti al processo galileiano e alla condanna della dottrina copernicana. Atti della R. Accademia dei Lincei: Memorie della classe di scienze morali, storiche e filosofiche, 1881–1882, year 279, 3rd series, 10: 49–96. Bertolla, P. 1979. Le vicende del ‘Galileo’ di Paschini (dall’epistolario Paschini-Vale). In Atti del convegno di studio su Pio Paschini, 173–208. Besomi, O., and M. Helbing (eds). 1998. Dialogo sopra i due massimi sistemi del mondo, tole- maico e copernicano, 2 vols. Critical edition and commentary. Padua: Antenore. Biagioli, M. 1993. Galileo Courtier. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Biagioli, M. 1996. Playing with the evidence. Early Science and Medicine 1: 70–105. Biagioli, M. 2000. Replication or monopoly? Science in Context 13: 547–590. Biagioli, M. 2003. Stress in the book of nature. MLN: Modern Language Notes 118: 557–585. Biagioli, M. 2006a. Galileo’s Instruments of Credit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Biagioli, M. 2006b. From print to patents. History of Science 44: 139–186. Bianchi, L. 2000. Interventi divini, miracoli e ipotesi soprannaturali nel ‘Dialogo’ di Galileo. In Canziani et al. 2000, 239–251. Bianchi, L. 2001. Agostino Oreggi, qualificatore del Dialogo, e i limiti della conoscenza scienti- fica. In Montesinos and Solís 2001, 575–586. Biot, J.B. 1816. Galilée. In Biographie universelle, 52 vols (Paris, 1811–1828), 16: 318–337. Biot, J.B. 1858. Mélanges scientifiques et littéraires, 3 vols. Paris. Blackwell, R.J. 1991. Galileo, Bellarmine, and the Bible. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Blackwell, R.J., trans and ed. 1994. A Defense of Galileo, the Mathematician from Florence by Thomas Campanella. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Blackwell, R.J. 1998a. Could There Be Another Galileo Case? In Machamer 1998a, 348–366.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Petrarch and Boccaccio Mimesis
    Petrarch and Boccaccio Mimesis Romanische Literaturen der Welt Herausgegeben von Ottmar Ette Band 61 Petrarch and Boccaccio The Unity of Knowledge in the Pre-modern World Edited by Igor Candido An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative and links to the Open Access version can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. The Open Access book is available at www.degruyter.com. ISBN 978-3-11-042514-7 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-041930-6 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-041958-0 ISSN 0178-7489 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 license. For more information, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2018 Igor Candido, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Typesetting: Konvertus, Haarlem Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Dedicated to Ronald Witt (1932–2017) Contents Acknowledgments IX Igor Candido Introduction 1 H. Wayne Storey The
    [Show full text]
  • 1 James Hankins Department of History Harvard University Chronological List of Publications
    1 James Hankins Department of History Harvard University Chronological List of Publications IN PRESS “Petrarch and the Canon of Neo-Latin Literature” to be published in the proceedings of the conference the conference “Petrarca, l’Umanesimo e la civiltà europea,” Florence, Italy, December 2004, sponsored the Comitato Nazionale per il VII Centenario della Nascita di Francesco Petrarca. “The Chronology of Leonardo Bruni’s Later Works (1437-1443).” Forthcoming in Studi medievali e umanistici 5 (2007). “Monstrous Melancholy: Ficino and the Physiological Causes of Atheism,” forthcoming in a volume tentatively entitled, Laus Platonici philosophi: Marsilio Ficino and His Influence,” ed. Stephen Clucas and Valerie Rees (Brill). “Malinconia mostruosa: Ficino e le cause fisiologiche dell’atesimo,” the same in Italian translation, forthcoming in Rinascimento 2007. “Humanist Academies and Platonic Academies,” forthcoming in the proceedings of the conference, From the Roman Academy to the Danish Academy in Rome, ed. H. Ragn Jensen and M. Pade, to appear in Analecta Romana Instituti Danici Supplementum. French and Italian translations of Plato in the Italian Renaissance (1990) are to appear, respectively, with Les Belles Lettres (Paris), tr. Yves-Alain Segonds, and the press of the Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa (Edizioni del SNS), tr. Stefano Baldassarri. A new, revised edition of the English original is forthcoming from Brill. 2008 111. (with Ada Palmer). The Recovery of Ancient Philosophy in the Renaissance. A Brief Guide. (Istituto Nazionale di Studi sul Rinascimento, Quaderni di Rinascimento, vol. 44). Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 2008. VIII + 96 pp. 2 110. “Notes on the Composition and Textual Tradition of Leonardo Bruni’s Historiarum Florentini populi libri XII,” in Classica et Beneventana: Essays presented to Virginia Brown on the Occasion of her Sixty-Fifth Birthday, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Utiles Et Necessarias: Early Modern Science and the Society of Jesus
    Utiles et Necessarias: Early Modern Science and the Society of Jesus Sister Mary Sarah Galbraith, O.P. A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Unit of History and Philosophy of Science, Faculty of Science University of Sydney March 2021 Utiles et Necessarias 2 Utiles et Necessarias 3 Utiles et Necessarias: Early Modern Science and the Society of Jesus Sister Mary Sarah Galbraith, O.P. This thesis treats of the contributions made by the Society of Jesus to Early Modern science, amidst the complexities of the post Reformation, post Copernican era. Its focus is the life and work of the Jesuit Christopher Clavius (1538-1612), the architect and founder of a mathematics academy at the Collegio Romano. Using extant correspondence, pamphlet, prefatory dedications and commentaries, I show that Clavius created a strategy to recruit and train Jesuit priests in mathematics to be exported throughout Europe and to remote missionary outposts. As a specially trained corps of priest mathematicians, the Jesuits used the truths of mathematics and the mathematical sciences to draw potential converts to the truths of faith and religious conversion. The approach was initially successful. As the scientific and religious culture shifted in the sixteenth century, however, reliance upon traditional sources of authority, knowledge and belief came under scrutiny. As priests and mathematicians who were invested in both sacred and secular realms, members of the Society struggled to adhere to the tenets of traditional natural philosophy and to promote the new sciences, for the purposes of religious conversion. The approach that substituted the truths of mathematics for the truths of dogmatic faith was intended to engender confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Homage to Galileo Galilei 1564-2014 Reading Iuvenilia Galilean Works Within History and Historical Epistemology of Science
    Philosophia Scientiæ Travaux d'histoire et de philosophie des sciences 21-1 | 2017 Homage to Galileo Galilei 1564-2014 Reading Iuvenilia Galilean Works within History and Historical Epistemology of Science Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/1229 DOI: 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1229 ISSN: 1775-4283 Publisher Éditions Kimé Printed version Date of publication: 15 February 2017 ISBN: 978-2-84174-801-3 ISSN: 1281-2463 Electronic reference Philosophia Scientiæ, 21-1 | 2017, “Homage to Galileo Galilei 1564-2014” [Online], Online since 15 February 2019, connection on 30 March 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ philosophiascientiae/1229; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1229 Tous droits réservés Editorial Gerhard Heinzmann Laboratoire d’Histoire des Sciences et de Philosophie, Archives H.-Poincaré, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, Nancy (France) Le premier cahier de Philosophia Scientiæ est paru il y a plus de vingt ans, en juin 1996. Il a été édité par une jeune équipe des Archives Henri-Poincaré à Nancy et dirigé par le même rédacteur en chef dans un souci constant : promouvoir la recherche en philosophie des sciences, tout particulièrement en ce qui concerne la logique, l’informatique, les mathématiques et la physique, en s’inscrivant dans la tradition analytique, en prenant en compte l’histoire et la pratique des sciences, en préservant le français, l’anglais et l’allemand comme langues « scientifiques » à titre égal. En passant la main à la nouvelle équipe, Manuel Rebuschi comme rédacteur en chef et Baptiste Mélès comme rédacteur en chef adjoint, j’exprime ma gratitude à Manuel, rédacteur en chef adjoint depuis 2008, et à Sandrine Avril, secrétaire de rédaction, pour leur travail efficace et leur dévouement.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TRIAL of GALILEO-REVISITED Dr
    THE TRIAL OF GALILEO-REVISITED Dr. George DeRise Professor Emeritus, Mathematics Thomas Nelson Community College FALL 2018 Mon 1:30 PM- 3:30 PM, 6 sessions 10/22/2018 - 12/3/2018 (Class skip date 11/19) Sadler Center, Commonwealth Auditorium Christopher Wren Association BOOKS: THE TRIAL OF GALILEO, 1612-1633: Thomas F. Mayer. (Required) THE CASE FOR GALILEO- A CLOSED QUESTION? Fantoli, Annibale. GALILEO; THE RISE AND FALL OF A TROUBLESOME GENIUS. Shea, William; Artigas, Mariano. BASIC ONLINE SOURCES: Just Google: “Galileo” and “Galileo Affair” (WIKI) “Galileo Project” and “Trial of Galileo-Famous Trials” YOUTUBE MOVIES: Just Google: “GALILEO'S BATTLE FOR THE HEAVENS – NOVA – YOUTUBE” “GREAT BOOKS, GALILEO’S DIALOGUE – YOUTUBE” HANDOUTS: GLOSSARY CAST OF CHARACTERS BLUE DOCUMENTS GALILEO GALILEI: b. 1564 in Pisa, Italy Astronomer, Physicist, Mathematician Professor of Mathematics, Universities of Pisa and Padua. In 1610 he observed the heavens with the newly invented telescope- mountains and craters of the moon, moons of Jupiter, many stars never seen before; later the phases of Venus; sunspots. These observations supported his belief that the Copernican (Heliocentric) system was correct, i.e. that the Sun was the center of the Universe; the planets including earth revolved around it. This was in direct contrast to the Ptolemaic-Aristotelian (Geocentric) System which was 1500 years old at the time. Galileo’s Copernican view was also in conflict with the Christian interpretation of Holy Scripture. Because of the Counter Reformation Catholic theologians took a literal interpretation of the Bible. Galileo was investigated by the Inquisition in 1615 and warned not to defend the Copernican view.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reception of the Copernican Revolution Among Provençal Humanists of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries*
    The Reception of the Copernican Revolution Among Provençal Humanists of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries* Jean-Pierre Luminet Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille (LAM) CNRS-UMR 7326 & Centre de Physique Théorique de Marseille (CPT) CNRS-UMR 7332 & Observatoire de Paris (LUTH) CNRS-UMR 8102 France E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We discuss the reception of Copernican astronomy by the Provençal humanists of the XVIth- XVIIth centuries, beginning with Michel de Montaigne who was the first to recognize the potential scientific and philosophical revolution represented by heliocentrism. Then we describe how, after Kepler’s Astronomia Nova of 1609 and the first telescopic observations by Galileo, it was in the south of France that the New Astronomy found its main promotors with humanists and « amateurs écairés », Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc and Pierre Gassendi. The professional astronomer Jean-Dominique Cassini, also from Provence, would later elevate the field to new heights in Paris. Introduction In the first book I set forth the entire distribution of the spheres together with the motions which I attribute to the earth, so that this book contains, as it were, the general structure of the universe. —Nicolaus Copernicus, Preface to Pope Paul III, On the Revolution of the Heavenly Spheres, 1543.1 Written over the course of many years by the Polish Catholic canon Nicolaus Copernicus (1473–1543) and published following his death, De revolutionibus orbium cœlestium (On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres) is regarded by historians as the origin of the modern vision of the universe.2 The radical new ideas presented by Copernicus in De revolutionibus * Extended version of the article "The Provençal Humanists and Copernicus" published in Inference, vol.2 issue 4 (2017), on line at http://inference-review.com/.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Sense As a Cultural Practice
    Jörg Rogge (ed.) Making Sense as a Cultural Practice Mainz Historical Cultural Sciences | Volume 18 Editorial The Mainzer Historische Kulturwissenschaften [Mainz Historical Cultural Sciences] series publishes the results of research that develops methods and theories of cultural sciences in connection with empirical research. The central approach is a historical perspective on cultural sciences, whereby both epochs and regions can differ widely and be treated in an all-embracing manner from time to time. Amongst other, the series brings together research approaches in archaeology, art history, visual studies, literary studies, philosophy, and history, and is open for contributions on the history of knowledge, political culture, the history of perceptions, experiences and life-worlds, as well as other fields of research with a historical cultural scientific orientation. The objective of the Mainzer Historische Kulturwissenschaften series is to be- come a platform for pioneering works and current discussions in the field of historical cultural sciences. The series is edited by the Co-ordinating Committee of the Research Unit His- torical Cultural Sciences (HKW) at the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz. Jörg Rogge (ed.) Making Sense as a Cultural Practice Historical Perspectives The conference on Making Sense as a Cultural Practice and this print were spon- sored by the Research Unit Historical Cultural Sciences (HKW). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 (BY-NC-ND). which means that the text may be used for non-commercial purposes, provided credit is given to the author. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Natio- nalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Anna of Denmark and the Politics of Religious Identity in Jacobean Scotland and England, C.1592-1619
    Anna of Denmark and the Politics of Religious Identity in Jacobean Scotland and England, c.1592-1619 Jemma Field Acknowledgement THE CRUX of this research has been with me for several years, has undergone countless iterations, and would never have come to publication without the invaluable support, questions, and suggestions of Associate Professor Erin Griffey (Auckland), Professor Steve Murdoch (St Andrews), and Professor Emeritus R. Malcolm Smuts (Massachusetts Boston), all of whom believed that the established narrative warranted critical engagement. I am further grateful to Steve Murdoch, together with Dr Peter Maxwell-Stuart (St Andrews), for assistance with the translation of Danish, German, and Latin material beyond my own proficiency, although I take full responsibility for any errors herein. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions [706198]. The Lutheran Anna of Denmark (1574–1619) was one of those exceptionally well-placed early modern women. A member of the dynastic houses of Oldenburg and Stuart, she was daughter, sister, wife, and mother of kings, and she also retained close connections to a number of other royal and ducal houses in Europe. Her ancestral dynastic links, coupled with the marriages of her siblings, extended her kinship network beyond her natal kingdom of Denmark-Norway and its territories of Schleswig, Holstein, Stormarn, and Dithmarschen, to include Brandenburg, Braunschweig- Lüneburg, Dresden, Holstein-Gottorf, Mecklenburg-Güstrow, and Electoral Saxony. With her marriage to King James VI (1566–1625) in 1589, Anna of Denmark moved to Scotland, and around 1592, or perhaps 1600, she converted to Catholicism.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetoric and Philosophical Discourse in Giordano Bruno's Italian Dialogues
    Rhetoric and Philosophical Discourse in Giordano Bruno’s Italian Dialogues Eugenio Canone Italian Council of Research, ILIESI-CNR, Rome, Institute for the European Intellectual Lexicon and for History of Ideas Leen Spruit Philology, Linguistics, and Anthropology, University of Rome La Sapienza Abstract The Renaissance writers adapted the dialogue form to represent the cul- ture they were creating, using it for numerous subjects: philosophy, ethics, politics, religion, the arts, the study of language, and literature. The dialogue was an appro- priate form for works which are at once serious, ironical, and critical. Giordano Bruno’s Italian dialogues are a case in point. This essay scrutinizes the structure of these works, with special attention to the role of the interlocutors in his rhetoric. During his sojourn in England (1583–85), Giordano Bruno (1548–1600) published six Italian dialogues. Since the end of the nineteenth century, these works have been the object of scholarly research. The dialogues have been studied not only as philosophical works but also—since the second 1. In 1584 Bruno published La cena de le Ceneri, De la causa, principio et uno, De l’infinito, universo e mondi, and Spaccio de la bestia trionfante; in 1585 Cabala del cavallo pegaseo and De gli eroici furori. Recently, a reprint of the original editions appeared; see Bruno 1999a. All dialogues were published in London with John Charlewood; the title pages display mere fictitious indica- tions of places and editors. The edition we used was Bruno 2002a. For the titles we use the following translations: The Ash Wednesday Supper (Bruno 1995 [1977]), On Cause, Principle, and Unity (Bruno 1998), On the Infinite Universe and Worlds (Bruno 1950), The Expulsion of the Trium- phant Beast (Bruno 1992 [1964]), The Cabala of Pegasus (Bruno 2002b), and The Heroic Frenzies (Bruno 1964).
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    PUBLISHING THE STUARTS: OCCASIONAL LITERATURE AND POLITICS FROM 1603 TO 1625 REBECCA A. CALCAGNO SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2011 © 2011 REBECCA A. CALCAGNO ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT PUBLISHING THE STUARTS: OCCASIONAL LITERATURE AND POLITICS FROM 1603 TO 1625 REBECCA A. CALCAGNO This dissertation examines occasional events at the Jacobean court through the literature written about them—the largely understudied and yet voluminous occasional works published in inexpensive formats during the first Stuart reign. Through a series of contextualized readings of key occasional events and texts, I argue that these poems and pamphlets not only move beyond the epideictic to engage in key political debates, but also that they present competing visions of the Stuart realm and illustrate the international frame of its court. By examining the relationship between occasional works and the “real” events which they discuss, I show how writers sought to persuade the public to accept their political viewpoints through fictional representations of the Stuarts. More importantly, I demonstrate the need to look beyond representations of the Stuarts sponsored by the Stuarts such as masques to fully understand their iconography. Attending to the contexts which shaped occasional literature and the meaningful ways in which authors yoked descriptions of state events to commentaries on political issues, demands a new history of occasional events at court and a new understanding of the Stuart court as polycentric in nature and international in scope. Scholars have long acknowledged the importance of occasional events at court, but dismissed the printed works published about them as ephemeral propaganda.
    [Show full text]
  • Be Scottish Gcyt Society the WORKS of WILLIAM FOWLER Secretary To
    %slr55. SCS STtSS. 13 £be Scottish Gcyt Society THE WORKS OF WILLIAM FOWLER Secretary to Queen Anne, wife of James VI. THE WORKS OF William Fowler Secretary to Queen Anne, wife of James VI. EDITED BY HENRY W. MEIKLE, M.A., D.Litt. librarian of the national library of Scotland JAMES CRAIGIE, M.A. HEAD OF THE ENGLISH DEPARTMENT, MUSSELBURGH GRAMMAR SCHOOL AND JOHN PURVES, M.A. READER IN ITALIAN IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH VOL. III.—(Introduction, Notes, &c.) $rmteb for tlje Socutg bg WILLIAM BLACKWOOD & SONS LTD. EDINBURGH AND LONDON 1940 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CONTENTS PAGE Introduction— I. THE LIFE AND WORKS OF WILLIAM FOWLER ix II. SOURCES—MS. AND PRINTED . xliii III. fowler’s LANGUAGE li 1. THE VOWELS Hi 2. THE CONSONANTS Ixvi 3- ACCIDENCE Ixviii 4. VOCABULARY Ixxii 5- RHYMES Ixxvii IV. FOWLER AND SCOTO-ITALIAN CULTURAL RELA- TIONS IN THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY Ixxx Appendices— I. TO ROB ART HUDSOUN cli II. OF THOMAS CARGILL INTERPRETER OFHESIODE clii in. fowler’s translation of machiavelli’s DEDICATION OF THE PRINCE . cHH IV. DRAFT OF FOWLER’S DEDICATION OF HIS TRANS- LATION OF THE PRINCE . civ V. FOREIGN SOURCES AND PARALLELS IN THE SONNETS Clvi Notes— TO VOL. I. 3 TO VOL. II. 35 TO VOL. III.—APPENDICES 71 Index to the First Lines of Poems ... 73 Glossary 81 General Index 147 PREFACE. This is the final volume of The Works of William Fowler, the first having been issued in 1914 and the second in 1936. The delay in completing this edition would have been even greater but for the collaboration of Mr Craigie and Mr Purves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enlightenment of Jean-Baptiste-Louis Gresset, Léger-Marie Deschamps, and Simon-Nicolas-Henri Linguet
    ‘TOUCHSTONES OF TRUTH’: THE ENLIGHTENMENT OF JEAN-BAPTISTE-LOUIS GRESSET, LÉGER-MARIE DESCHAMPS, AND SIMON-NICOLAS-HENRI LINGUET DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Mircea Alexandru Platon, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Dale K. Van Kley, Adviser Dr. Alice Conklin, Adviser Dr. Nicholas Breyfogle Copyright Mircea Alexandru Platon 2012 ABSTRACT My dissertation, “ ‘Touchstones of Truth’: The Enlightenment of J.-B.-L. Gresset, L.-M. Deschamps, and S.-N.-H. Linguet,” focuses on three key but little studied opponents of the philosophes. I argue that the writer Jean-Baptiste-Louis Gresset (1709- 1777), the philosopher Léger-Marie Deschamps (1716-1774), and the lawyer and political theorist Simon-Nicolas-Henri Linguet (1736-1794) opposed the philosophes in the name of a set of universally valid principles against what they took to be the philosophes' superficial, self-serving, and haphazard politicization of language, philosophy and the social sciences. These three intellectuals warned that such politicization fostered economic, political, and intellectual inequality as well as cultural alienation, thereby undermining the Enlightenment’s own vision of a world of self-emancipated human beings and pushing France in the direction of a violent revolution. Gresset supported a “civic republican” political economy of virtue, and warned about the dangers of the consumer culture fostered by the philosophes. The roots of his cultural criticism lay in moral and political concerns that found expression in a patriotic discourse stressing the importance of social “harmony” and the common good while rejecting any temptation to belong to a “party.” In this spirit, Gresset defended the “ancient constitution” against idle monks, royal or ministerial despotism, parlementarian rebellion, and the philosophes.
    [Show full text]