DOCSLIB.ORG

Middle East, North Africa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Middle East, North Africa MIDDLE EAST, NORTH AFRICA Speculation on Egyptian Cross-Border Military Deployment OE Watch Commentary: Critics of the Egyptian military call it a paper tiger, a bloated bureaucracy spending extravagantly on modern weaponry for political rather than military gain. They point to the seemingly never-ending insurgency in the Sinai as a prime example of the military’s shortcomings. Supporters of the Egyptian government see things differently, and the start of 2020 witnessed a surge of nationalist pride and fervor in the Egyptian press, following large-scale military displays (“Qader 2020”) and the opening of “the largest military base on the Red Sea” in Berenice (Baranis), just over 150 miles from the Saudi port of Yanbu across the Red Sea. The area has served as a port since at least the Hellenistic period and includes a promontory jutting east toward the Saudi coast, called Ras Banas (Cape Banas); it also has an airport that has been used by the Egyptian Air Force since the presidency of Abdel Nasser in the 1960s. The first excerpted passage argues that the Berenice base signals a shift in Egypt’s strategic priorities, away from Israel and toward viewing Islamist movements and their backers, most notably Turkey, as the key strategic threat. The author argues that the new base will in part serve to make it more difficult to implement the agreement by which Sudan was to lease a Red Sea island to Turkey. An infamous Saudi Arabian insider, who tweets critically from inside the Saudi royal family under the handle @mujtahidd, claims that the Berenice base was in fact planned by UAE leader Mohammed bin Zayed and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Sisi years ago, primarily to base a rapid deployment force that can be mobilized a short distance across the Red Sea to secure Mecca and Medina, in case “there is a failure in Saudi Arabia.” Whatever the case may be, Saudi and Emirati involvement in the base was highlighted by the presence of high-level delegations at the inauguration ceremony. The Berenice base opened shortly after the surprise deployment of Turkish military assets to back the Tripoli-based Government of National Accord (GNA) in Libya. Turkish actions raised questions on whether Egypt might deploy forces of its own to eastern Libya. In Arabic- language media, a slew of politicians, analysts, anonymous sources and armchair strategists discussed scenarios by which the Egyptian military would respond to Turkish deployments, only in support of the GNA’s Red Sea Topographical Map. adversary, the Khalifa Haftar-led Libyan National Army (LNA). Some Source: Eric Gaba via Wikimedia, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Red_Sea_topographic_map-en.svg, CC BY-SA reports claimed that the UAE sought to entice Egyptian military deployment to Libya “with a huge economic package, in addition to bearing all the costs of the battle there, while providing various other forms of support.” As the final accompanying passage notes, though, the Egyptian military establishment “has from the start been opposed to the idea of military participation in the crisis and sought to maintain ties with all parties” in Libya. In a move that has “brought great relief within the military establishment,” President Sisi recently reappointed Mahmoud Hegazy, former Chief of Staff of the Egyptian Armed Forces, to head the Libya file. Still, as the article suggests, there is some degree of disagreement within the Egyptian military about how to proceed in Libya, and continued Emirati encouragement for the Egyptian military to intervene directly may exacerbate these disagreements. End OE Watch Commentary (Winter) “… There are significant tensions within Egyptian institutions concerned with Libya …” OE Watch | March 2020 46 MIDDLE EAST, NORTH AFRICA Continued: Speculation on Egyptian Cross-Border Military Deployment ما حقيقة دور قاعدة برنيس العسكرية التي افتتحها السييس؟ :Source “What is the True Role of the Berenice Military Base Opened by Sisi?” Arabi21, 16 January 2019. https://tinyurl.com/wnf4mzs Mahmoud Gamal, a researcher on military affairs at the Egyptian Institute for Political and Strategic Studies, confirmed that the military base is not new as the regime claims, saying: “It is a military base that has merely been developed. It has been around for years, but since mid-2018 Sisi has worked to develop it, like the Mohammed Naguib military base, which Sisi opened in the west of the country as the largest military base in the Middle East, but which was also there before. The Egyptian regime, led by Sisi, is trying to create the appearance of military success by making the people think it is building new military bases. This is not true, what is happening is merely the development of existing rather than the construction of new bases.” He pointed out that “the location of those military bases, in the south and west of the country, reveal a transformation of Egyptian military doctrine in recent years, no longer considering Israel the historical enemy. Since 2013, the enemy has become political Islam, so we find it developing military bases, one towards Libya in the west and the other toward Sudan in the south, which was at the time was linked to the Bashir regime before its downfall.” Source: @Mujtahidd, Twitter, 20 January 2020. https://twitter.com/mujtahidd/status/1219170599597236224 The newly opened Egyptian Berenice base on the Red Sea has been ready for years, as part of a conspiracy between Sisi and bin Zayed. The real goal is Sisi’s control of the two holy mosques, if there is a failure in Saudi Arabia. It hosts a rapid intervention force and a plan is in place for air and sea landing in Jeddah and Yanbu on the way to Mecca and Medina. The plan was drawn up since Sisi’s arrival to power in coordination with Israel and bin Zayed. After the Turks landed on Sawakin Island in Sudan, Emirati-Israeli support doubled. Finally, bin Salman foolishly joined after bin Zayed convinced him to arm the region against Turkish presence and ally with Israel. فشل إمارايت بإقناع السييس ّبتدخل عسكري مبارش يف ليبيا :Source “Emirati Failure to Convince Sisi to Intervene Militarily in Libya,” al-Araby al-Jadid, 28 January 2020. https://tinyurl.com/rux3q5j According to the sources, Abu Dhabi and Riyadh linked the Egyptian administration’s approval of direct intervention in Libya with a huge economic package, in addition to bearing all the costs of the battle there, while providing various other forms of support. This was clearly rejected by the Egyptians, who stressed that they have provided all forms of logistical and military support for Haftar, across its borders, without directly intervening. The sources indicated that in January, official institutions in Abu Dhabi hosted a number of writers, thinkers and public figures who are influential in Egyptian decision-making, where they met with researchers and Emirati officials at various research centers, one of them affiliated with the UAE Ministry of Defense. Their discussions focused on the pressing need for a decisive end to the Libyan crisis and how this could only be achieved through the Egyptian army, which is the main stakeholder considering Libya is a neighboring country that directly affects Egyptian national security and interests. السييس يعيد حجازي إىل امللف الليبي ملواجهة غضب املؤسسة العسكرية :Source “Sisi Bring Hegazy Back to the Libya File to Calm Anger within the Military,” al-Araby al-Jadid, 8 January 2020. https://tinyurl.com/vvuv63a Private Egyptian sources revealed to al-Araby al-Jadid that Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah Al-Sisi brought back former Egyptian Army Chief of Staff, General Mahmoud Hegazy, to supervise the Libyan file. He has been chairing the Egyptian committee focused on this before being removed in the wake of the Al-Wahat massacre in late 2017. According to sources that spoke to al-Araby al-Jadeed, there are significant tensions within Egyptian institutions concerned with Libya. There is a strong faction within the military that rejects any direct military intervention in Libya, and refuses to put the armed forces in a battle that may be a trap for them. The sources added that the media and digital campaign to encourage Egyptian-Turkish military confrontation on Libyan soil has angered Egyptian regime insiders focused on the Libyan file, saying that talking about war battles as a political endeavor or an internal political like the parliamentary elections, is unacceptable to Sisi’s aides who manage the media… The sources pointed out that the return of the experienced Hegazy to supervise the Libya file has brought great relief within the military establishment, which has from the start been opposed to the idea of military participation in the crisis and sought to maintain ties with all parties, including building strong relations with all tribes in the Libyan territories, hoping to position Egypt as an umbrella for all in a way that helps preserve Egyptian interests in Libya, which has about a million and a half Egyptian workers. OE Watch | March 2020 47.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Five Years of Egypt's War on Terror
    FIVE YEARS OF EGYPT’S WAR ON TERROR The Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy (TIMEP) is dedicated to influencing policy toward the Middle East and North Africa through rigorous research and targeted advocacy efforts that promote local voices. TIMEP is fully registered and acknowledged under Section501(c)(3) in the District of Columbia. For more information about TIMEP’s mission, programming, or upcoming events, please visit timep.org. This report is the product of the collaborative efforts of TIMEP's staff and fellows. Cover image: A security checkpoint in the Egyptian Western Desert and the Bahariya Oasis in Siwa, Egypt, May 15, 2015 (photo by Amr Abdallah Dalsh for Reuters) CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 TERRORISM 5 COUNTER-TERRORISM 10 LEGAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXT 14 FINDINGS 15 TERRORISM 17 ACROSS EGYPT: Intensification and evolution in terror attacks after 2013 17 NORTH SINAI: Violence has become an entrenched insurgency 19 MAINLAND: Low-scale violence gives way to sporadic, deadly attacks 26 COUNTER-TERRORISM 35 ACROSS EGYPT: Tens of thousands of citizens ensnared in the war on terror 35 NORTH SINAI: Continuous military occupation 36 MAINLAND: Sweeping and broad crackdown 39 LEGAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXT 43 LEGAL AND JUDICIAL CONTEXT: The war on terror trumps rule of law 43 DOMESTIC POLITICAL CONTEXT: The war on terror as pretext for political consolidation 46 GEOPOLITICAL CONTEXT: Continued global support 49 FINDINGS 52 METHODOLOGY 54 Egypt Security Watch 3 Five Years of Egypt’s War on Terror INTRODUCTION On July 24, 2013, then-Defense Minister Abdel-Fattah El Sisi asked for a popular mandate to fight terrorism, marking the declaration of the “war on terror” that has lasted five years.
    [Show full text]
  • EGYPT: RESURGENCE of the SECURITY STATE by Ann M
    MARCH 2014 EGYPT: RESURGENCE OF THE SECURITY STATE By Ann M. Lesch Dr. Lesch is Emeritus Professor of Political Science at The American University in Egypt. The views expressed here are her own and do not represent the views of the university. Vast numbers of Egyptians took to the streets on June 30, determined to restore the goals of the January 25 revolution, undermined during the year of rule by Muslim Brotherhood President Mohamed Morsi. Protesters expressed overwhelming enthusiasm for the military, which sided with them as it had against Hosni Mubarak in February 2011. At the time, I expressed concern that the military, as an inherently authoritarian structure focused on national security, was a problematic vehicle to promote democratization. I also expressed concern that the interim president, who headed the supreme constitution court (SCC), merged executive, legislative, and judicial power in one person. There was also the risk that those who ousted the Brotherhood would gloat over their victory, rather than craft polices that acknowledged the political weight of Islamist trends and sought reconciliation.1 Unfortunately, those concerns have been borne out: Police are ruthless in the arrest and torture of critics, security is deteriorating, the new constitution reinforces the executive branch, the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) has anointed its senior officer as the next president and deepened the military’s role within the civilian economy, the Brotherhood is demonized, and freedom of expression is circumscribed. Before July 3, Field Marshal Abdel Fattah El-Sisi had warned that the “army is a fire… Do not play against it and do not play with it”2 and expressed concern that, once the military would intervene, it would remain entrenched for decades.
    [Show full text]
  • EGYPT: RESURGENCE of the SECURITY STATE by Ann M
    MARCH 2014 EGYPT: RESURGENCE OF THE SECURITY STATE By Ann M. Lesch Dr. Lesch is Emeritus Professor of Political Science at The American University in Egypt. The views expressed here are her own and do not represent the views of the university. Vast numbers of Egyptians took to the streets on June 30, determined to restore the goals of the January 25 revolution, undermined during the year of rule by Muslim Brotherhood President Mohamed Morsi. Protesters expressed overwhelming enthusiasm for the military, which sided with them as it had against Hosni Mubarak in February 2011. At the time, I expressed concern that the military, as an inherently authoritarian structure focused on national security, was a problematic vehicle to promote democratization. I also expressed concern that the interim president, who headed the supreme constitution court (SCC), merged executive, legislative, and judicial power in one person. There was also the risk that those who ousted the Brotherhood would gloat over their victory, rather than craft polices that acknowledged the political weight of Islamist trends and sought reconciliation.1 Unfortunately, those concerns have been borne out: Police are ruthless in the arrest and torture of critics, security is deteriorating, the new constitution reinforces the executive branch, the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) has anointed its senior officer as the next president and deepened the military’s role within the civilian economy, the Brotherhood is demonized, and freedom of expression is circumscribed. Before July 3, Field Marshal Abdel Fattah El-Sisi had warned that the “army is a fire… Do not play against it and do not play with it”2 and expressed concern that, once the military would intervene, it would remain entrenched for decades.
    [Show full text]
  • To Read Text in PDF Format Click Here
    تقارير 0 نوفمبر 2017 June 14, 2021 An overview of Sisi’s reshuffle of top army officers (June 2021) Mahmoud Gamal Introduction There are usually two reshuffles of senior commanders and officers of the Egyptian army, that are carried out on a regular basis in June and December every year; where the first reshuffle takes place in June, and the second one takes place in December – after having the approval of the Supreme Commander of the Egyptian Armed Forces. 1- Reshuffle of top army commanders as follows: • First: the transfer of commanders from senior positions to other senior positions, or promotion of new commanders to senior positions within the Egyptian army, such as heading one of the main branches of the armed forces, an army authority, a military zone, or a field army. This level of command that constitutes the 26 members of the Supreme Council of the Egyptian Armed Forces (SCAF), is usually known as the ‘first-class leaders’1. • Second: the promotion of middle-level officers to senior positions in advanced ranks, such as the chief of staff of a major branch, a military authority, a military zone, or a field army; and thus they join the senior officers of the Egyptian army, or the so-called ‘second-class leaders’. • Third: the retirement of commanders or officers, due to military laws related to the pension age or for other reasons, such as a chronic disease that hinders the officer from carrying out tasks entrusted to him, or simply for security reasons based on military investigations periodically conducted for all officers.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt0519 Reportcover 8
    HUMAN “If You Are Afraid for Your Lives, RIGHTS Leave Sinai!” WATCH Egyptian Security Forces and ISIS-Affiliate Abuses in North Sinai “If You Are Afraid for Your Lives, Leave Sinai!” Egyptian Security Forces and ISIS-Affiliate Abuses in North Sinai Copyright © 2019 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-37359 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amman, Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org MAY 2019 ISBN: 978-1-6231-37359 “If You Are Afraid for Your Lives, Leave Sinai!” Egyptian Security Forces and ISIS-Affiliate Abuses in North Sinai Map of North Sinai, Egypt .................................................................................................... i Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Government
    [Show full text]
  • AVOIDING an EPIC MISTAKE the Case for Continuing the U.S
    THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY n MAY 2020 n PN80 Assaf Orion and Denis Thompson AVOIDING AN EPIC MISTAKE The Case for Continuing the U.S. Mission in Sinai As part of its 2018 National Defense Strategy (NDS), the United States is seeking to focus on Great Power competition and withdraw from legacy missions it sees as irrelevant.1 Yet one of the missions under consideration is hardly irrelevant. U.S. Army participation in the Multinational Force & Observers (MFO) in the Sinai Peninsula constitutes a vital part of the 1979 Israel-Egypt peace treaty architecture. While the NDS approach to legacy missions makes sense in principle, U.S. withdrawal from the MFO would be a colossal mistake. Indeed, Israel- Egypt relations are at an all-time high, but rather than showing the diminished importance of peacekeepers, it demonstrates the opposite: their essential role in having reached this summit and in climbing onward. The MFO has been critical in helping the parties across volatile crises through its communication, trust building, and verification roles, and Israel-Egypt relations owe a great deal to these efforts. U.S. participation in the MFO appears to have generated an asymmetrical impact—a very small and increasingly efficient military © 2020 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ORION AND THOMPSON investment, with burden-sharing partners, has Defense Department leadership, the Army began yielded lasting grand-strategic benefits. U.S. forces planning for serious cuts in 2020 and a total in Sinai are superbly positioned not only to advance withdrawal from the mission by the end of 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Watch All Rights Reserved
    HUMAN RIGHTS ALL ACCORDING TO PLAN The Rab’a Massacre and Mass Killings of Protesters in Egypt WATCH All According to Plan The Rab’a Massacre and Mass Killings of Protesters in Egypt Copyright © 2014 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-1661 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org AUGUST 2014 978-1-62313-1661 All According to Plan The Rab’a Massacre and Mass Killings of Protesters in Egypt Map .............................................................................................................................................. I Summary and Key Recommendations ........................................................................................... 1 Methodology ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Rab'a Massacre and Mass Killings of Protesters in Egypt
    H U M A N R I G H T S ALL ACCORDING TO PLAN The Rab’a Massacre and Mass Killings of Protesters in Egypt WATCH All According to Plan The Rab’a Massacre and Mass Killings of Protesters in Egypt Copyright © 2014 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-1661 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org AUGUST 2014 978-1-62313-1661 All According to Plan The Rab’a Massacre and Mass Killings of Protesters in Egypt Map .............................................................................................................................................. I Summary and Key Recommendations ........................................................................................... 1 Methodology ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Analysis on Media Coverage of the Egyptian Revolution
    Örebro University School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences 2010‐2012 A CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE EGYPTIAN REVOLUTION: THE CASE OF AL-AHRAM, AL-MASRY AL-YOUM, THE TELEGRAPH AND THE WASHINGTON POST MA Thesis Global Journalism Supervisor: Prof. Stig‐Arne Nohrstedt Author: Ahmed Magdy Youssef Word of Gratitude First of all, I would like to thank my university mentor, Stig-arne Nohrsted, as being the one who helped me in carrying out this thesis. Actually, I found succour in him during the thesis project. Not surbrisingly, he was replying back to my questions all the time, though, sometimes, he was very busy. Also, I would like to thank my loving wife Hend and my “naughty” son Hamza, whose boundless love keeps pushing me forward all the time. ii ABSTRACT The Egyptian protest movement which brought down the Egyptian regime headed by President Hosni Mubarak, not only gripped the minds and hearts of the Egyptians, but it captured the interest of the national and international media as well. The research aims at answering questions related to the kind of frames employed in four newspapers; namely, Al-Ahram, Al-Masry Al-Youm, The Telegraph and The Washington Post, in light of the protest paradigm, in addition to the way the same four newspapers tried to explore and identify the characteristics of war and peace journalism, according to Galtung’s dichotomous model, not to mention to trace how the four newspapers in hand depicted the protesters. To achieve this, two methods were applied in this study; notably, frame analysis, and critical discourse analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Fo#371/23362
    cms PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE ins I •) r 2 Please note that this copy is supplied subject to the Public Record Office's terms and conditions and that your use of it may be subject to copyright restrictions. Further information is given in the enclosed Terms and Conditions of supply of Public Records' leaflet ii/FT arid Registry \_ Number / 2876/478/16 Egyptian Personalities Report FROM Sir.M«LampBon. No 598 of Cairo* " May, 1938 No ®55 Transmits revised list of personalities in Egypt.' (263/2/39) Dated 10th July, 24th J:Sgypt and. Sudan. Last Paper References. ^ )'-j--, cms PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE ins **• Fo 3?/"7 Please note that this copy is supplied subject to the Public Record Office's terms and conditions and that your use of it may be subject to copyright restrictions. Further information is given in the enclosed Terms and Conditions of supply of Public Records' leaflet 4* THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY O¥ HIS BRITANNIC MAJESTY'S GOVERNMENT EGYPT AND SUDAN. July 24, 1939. CONFIDENTIAL. ARCHIVli SECTION 1. [J 2876/478/16] Copy No. Sir M. Lampson to Viscount Halifax.—(Received July 24.) (No. 855.) My Lord, ' Alexandria, July 10, 1939. WITH reference to my despatch No. 598 of the 21st May, 1938, I have the honour to transmit herewith a revised list of personalities in Egypt, compiled, in accordance with the instructions contained in Sir J. Simon's circular despatch of the 28th May, 1935, on the basis of the previous list. I have, &c. MILES W. LAMPSON. Enclosure. INDEX. I.—Egyptian Personalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Years of Egypt's War on Terror
    FIVE YEARS OF EGYPT’S WAR ON TERROR The Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy (TIMEP) is dedicated to influencing policy toward the Middle East and North Africa through rigorous research and targeted advocacy efforts that promote local voices. TIMEP is fully registered and acknowledged under Section501(c)(3) in the District of Columbia. For more information about TIMEP’s mission, programming, or upcoming events, please visit timep.org. This report is the product of the collaborative efforts of TIMEP's staff and fellows. Cover image: A security checkpoint in the Egyptian Western Desert and the Bahariya Oasis in Siwa, Egypt, May 15, 2015 (pho- to by Amr Abdallah Dalsh for Reuters) CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 TERRORISM 5 COUNTER-TERRORISM 10 LEGAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXT 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 TERRORISM 17 ACROSS EGYPT: Intensification and evolution in terror attacks after 2013 17 NORTH SINAI: Violence has become an entrenched insurgency 19 MAINLAND: Low-scale violence gives way to sporadic, deadly attacks 26 COUNTER-TERRORISM 35 ACROSS EGYPT: Tens of thousands of citizens ensnared in the war on terror 35 NORTH SINAI: Continuous military occupation 36 MAINLAND: Sweeping and broad crackdown 39 LEGAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXT 43 LEGAL AND JUDICIAL CONTEXT: The war on terror trumps rule of law 43 DOMESTIC POLITICAL CONTEXT: The war on terror as pretext for political consolidation 46 GEOPOLITICAL CONTEXT: Continued global support 49 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 52 SUMMARY FINDINGS 52 METHODOLOGY 54 Egypt Security Watch 3 Five Years of Egypt’s War on Terror INTRODUCTION On July 24, 2013, then-Defense Minister Abdel-Fattah El Sisi asked for a popular mandate to fight terrorism, marking the declaration of the “war on terror” that has lasted five years.
    [Show full text]
  • To Read Text in PDF Format Click Here
    تقارير 0 نوفمبر 2017 December 6, 2019 Sidelining Sisi’s Eldest Son and the General’s New Map Mahmoud Gamal In November 2019, press reports revealed that a decision was issued to reassign Mahmoud al-Sisi, the son of Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, and a General Intelligence Service officer, to a long-term position at Egypt’s diplomatic delegation in Moscow, Russia, after his increased influence had negatively affected the image of his father, Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, and the current regime. Moreover, Mahmoud Al-Sisi has failed in managing several files that he had assumed, especially the media file, according to these reports. Some see the move to sideline Mahmoud al-Sisi currently, as an indicator that Abdel Fattah al-Sisi after the popular protests that broke out on 20 September 2019, is completely different from Abdel Fattah al-Sisi before – from 3 July 2013 to 19 September 2019. Sisi, who used to ignore the advice of sovereign institutions, has now realized the danger threatening his regime and started to back down from his position in many files, according to a new policy he has adopted to face this critical situation. Does this indicate the beginning of a new phase in Sisi's rule, or is it just a reordering of priorities and objectives? Sisi and sovereign institutions after the coup Sisi has made many enemies within the military institution over the past eight years. He has fired nearly 50 military commanders from the military junta for domination of power, turning the regime in Egypt, from the rule of the military institution as a whole – as established by Gamal Abdel Nasser in 1954 – to the rule of the military individual.
    [Show full text]