0752H11.04H Sb 153

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

0752H11.04H Sb 153 0752H11.04H SB 153 House _______________________________________________________ Amendment NO.____ Offered By _____________________________________ ___________________________________ 1 AMEND House Committee Substitute for Senate Substitute for Senate Committee Substitute for 2 Senate Bill Nos. 153 & 97, Page 37, Section 287.245, Line 33, by inserting after all of said section 3 and line the following: 4 5 "313.800. 1. As used in sections 313.800 to 313.850, unless the context clearly requires 6 otherwise, the following terms mean: 7 (1) "Adjusted gross receipts", the gross receipts from licensed gambling games and devices 8 less winnings paid to wagerers. "Adjusted gross receipts" shall not include adjusted gross receipts 9 from sports wagering as defined in section 313.1000; 10 (2) "Applicant", any person applying for a license authorized under the provisions of 11 sections 313.800 to 313.850; 12 (3) "Bank", the elevations of ground which confine the waters of the Mississippi or Missouri 13 Rivers at the ordinary high water mark as defined by common law; 14 (4) "Capital, cultural, and special law enforcement purpose expenditures" shall include any 15 disbursement, including disbursements for principal, interest, and costs of issuance and trustee 16 administration related to any indebtedness, for the acquisition of land, land improvements, buildings 17 and building improvements, vehicles, machinery, equipment, works of art, intersections, signing, 18 signalization, parking lot, bus stop, station, garage, terminal, hanger, shelter, dock, wharf, rest area, 19 river port, airport, light rail, railroad, other mass transit, pedestrian shopping malls and plazas, parks, 20 lawns, trees, and other landscape, convention center, roads, traffic control devices, sidewalks, alleys, 21 ramps, tunnels, overpasses and underpasses, utilities, streetscape, lighting, trash receptacles, 22 marquees, paintings, murals, fountains, sculptures, water and sewer systems, dams, drainage 23 systems, creek bank restoration, any asset with a useful life greater than one year, cultural events, 24 and any expenditure related to a law enforcement officer deployed as horse-mounted patrol, school 25 resource or drug awareness resistance education (D.A.R.E) officer; 26 (5) "Cheat", to alter the selection of criteria which determine the result of a gambling game 27 or the amount or frequency of payment in a gambling game; 28 (6) "Commission", the Missouri gaming commission; 29 (7) "Credit instrument", a written check, negotiable instrument, automatic bank draft or 30 other authorization from a qualified person to an excursion gambling boat licensee or any of its 31 affiliated companies licensed by the commission authorizing the licensee to withdraw the amount of 32 credit extended by the licensee to such person from the qualified person's banking account in an 33 amount determined under section 313.817 on or after a date certain of not more than thirty days 34 from the date the credit was extended, and includes any such writing taken in consolidation, 35 redemption or payment of a previous credit instrument, but does not include any interest-bearing 36 installment loan or other extension of credit secured by collateral; Action Taken___________________________________________ Date __________________ Page 1 of 10 0752H11.04H 1 (8) "Dock", the location in a city or county authorized under subsection 10 of section 2 313.812 which contains any natural or artificial space, inlet, hollow, or basin, in or adjacent to a 3 bank of the Mississippi or Missouri Rivers, next to a wharf or landing devoted to the embarking of 4 passengers on and disembarking of passengers from a gambling excursion but shall not include any 5 artificial space created after May 20, 1994, and is located more than one thousand feet from the 6 closest edge of the main channel of the river as established by the United States Army Corps of 7 Engineers; 8 (9) "Excursion gambling boat", a boat, ferry or other floating facility licensed by the 9 commission on which gambling games are allowed; 10 (10) "Fiscal year", [shall] for the purposes of [subsections 3 and 4 of] section 313.820, 11 [mean] the fiscal year of a home dock city or county; 12 (11) "Floating facility", any facility built or originally built as a boat, ferry or barge licensed 13 by the commission on which gambling games are allowed; 14 (12) "Gambling excursion", the time during which gambling games may be operated on an 15 excursion gambling boat whether docked or during a cruise; 16 (13) "Gambling game" includes, but is not limited to, games of skill or games of chance on 17 an excursion gambling boat [but does not include gambling on sporting events]; provided such 18 games of chance are approved by amendment to the Missouri Constitution; 19 (14) "Games of chance", any gambling game in which the player's expected return is not 20 favorably increased by [his or her] such player's reason, foresight, dexterity, sagacity, design, 21 information or strategy; 22 (15) "Games of skill", any gambling game in which there is an opportunity for the player to 23 use [his or her] such player's reason, foresight, dexterity, sagacity, design, information or strategy to 24 favorably increase the player's expected return; including, but not limited to, the gambling games 25 known as "poker", "blackjack" (twenty-one), "craps", "Caribbean stud", "pai gow poker", "Texas 26 hold'em", "double down stud", "sports wagering", and any video representation of such games; 27 (16) "Gross receipts", the total sums wagered by patrons of licensed gambling games; 28 (17) "Holder of occupational license", a person licensed by the commission to perform an 29 occupation within excursion gambling boat operations which the commission has identified as 30 requiring a license; 31 (18) "Licensee", any person licensed under sections 313.800 to 313.850; 32 (19) "Mississippi River" and "Missouri River", the water, bed and banks of those rivers, 33 including any space filled by the water of those rivers for docking purposes in a manner approved 34 by the commission but shall not include any artificial space created after May 20, 1994, and is 35 located more than one thousand feet from the closest edge of the main channel of the river as 36 established by the United States Army Corps of Engineers; 37 (20) "Supplier", a person who sells or leases gambling equipment and gambling supplies to 38 any licensee. 39 2. (1) In addition to the games of skill defined in this section, the commission may approve 40 other games of skill upon receiving a petition requesting approval of a gambling game from any 41 applicant or licensee. The commission may set the matter for hearing by serving the applicant or 42 licensee with written notice of the time and place of the hearing not less than five days prior to the 43 date of the hearing and posting a public notice at each commission office. The commission shall 44 require the applicant or licensee to pay the cost of placing a notice in a newspaper of general 45 circulation in the applicant's or licensee's home dock city or county. The burden of proof that the 46 gambling game is a game of skill is at all times on the petitioner. The petitioner shall have the 47 affirmative responsibility of establishing [his or her] the petitioner's case by a preponderance of 48 evidence including: 49 [(1)] (a) Is it in the best interest of gaming to allow the game; and Page 2 of 10 0752H11.04H 1 [(2)] (b) Is the gambling game a game of chance or a game of skill? 2 (2) All testimony shall be given under oath or affirmation. Any citizen of this state shall 3 have the opportunity to testify on the merits of the petition. The commission may subpoena 4 witnesses to offer expert testimony. Upon conclusion of the hearing, the commission shall evaluate 5 the record of the hearing and issue written findings of fact that shall be based exclusively on the 6 evidence and on matters officially noticed. The commission shall then render a written decision on 7 the merits which shall contain findings of fact, conclusions of law and a final commission order. 8 The final commission order shall be within thirty days of the hearing. Copies of the final 9 commission order shall be served on the petitioner by certified or overnight express mail, postage 10 prepaid, or by personal delivery. 11 313.1000. As used in sections 313.1000 to 313.1022, the following terms mean: 12 (1) "Adjusted gross receipts": 13 (a) The total of all cash and cash equivalents received by a sports wagering operator from 14 sports wagering minus the total of: 15 a. All cash and cash equivalents paid out as winnings to sports wagering patrons; 16 b. The actual costs paid by a sports wagering operator for any personal property or services 17 distributed to sports wagering patrons as prizes; 18 c. Voided or cancelled wagers; 19 d. Free play or promotional credits; and 20 e. Uncollectible sports wagering receivables, not to exceed the lesser of: 21 (i) A reasonable provision for uncollectible patron checks, ACHs, debit cards, and credit 22 cards received from sports wagering operations; or 23 (ii) Two percent of the total of all sums, including checks, whether collected or not, less the 24 amount paid out as winnings to sports wagering patrons. For purposes of this section, a counter or 25 personal check that is invalid or unenforceable under this section is considered cash received by the 26 sports wagering operator from sports wagering operations. 27 (b) If the amount of adjusted gross receipts on a gaming day is a negative figure, the 28 certificate holder shall remit no sports wagering tax for that gaming day.
Recommended publications
  • Act 328 of 1931 CHAPTER XLIV GAMBLING 750.301 Accepting Money Or Valuable Thing Contingent on Uncertain Event
    THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT) Act 328 of 1931 CHAPTER XLIV GAMBLING 750.301 Accepting money or valuable thing contingent on uncertain event. Sec. 301. Any person or his or her agent or employee who, directly or indirectly, takes, receives, or accepts from any person any money or valuable thing with the agreement, understanding or allegation that any money or valuable thing will be paid or delivered to any person where the payment or delivery is alleged to be or will be contingent upon the result of any race, contest, or game or upon the happening of any event not known by the parties to be certain, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 1 year or a fine of not more than $1,000.00. History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931;CL 1948, 750.301;Am. 2002, Act 672, Eff. Mar. 31, 2003. Former law: See sections 1 and 11 of Act 176 of 1925, being CL 1929, §§ 9121 and 9131. 750.302 Keeping or occupying common gambling house or building or place where gaming permitted; apparatus used for gaming or gambling; manufacture or possession of gaming or gambling apparatus for sale. Sec. 302. (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), any person, or his or her agent or employee who, directly or indirectly, keeps, occupies, or assists in keeping or occupying any common gambling house or any building or place where gaming is permitted or suffered or who suffers or permits on any premises owned, occupied, or controlled by him or her any apparatus used for gaming or gambling or who shall use such apparatus for gaming or gambling in any place within this state, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 1 year or a fine of not more than $1,000.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Hedging Your Bets: Is Fantasy Sports Betting Insurance Really ‘Insurance’?
    HEDGING YOUR BETS: IS FANTASY SPORTS BETTING INSURANCE REALLY ‘INSURANCE’? Haley A. Hinton* I. INTRODUCTION Sports betting is an animal of both the past and the future: it goes through the ebbs and flows of federal and state regulations and provides both positive and negative repercussions to society. While opponents note the adverse effects of sports betting on the integrity of professional and collegiate sporting events and gambling habits, proponents point to massive public interest, the benefits to state economies, and the embracement among many professional sports leagues. Fantasy sports gaming has engaged people from all walks of life and created its own culture and industry by allowing participants to manage their own fictional professional teams from home. Sports betting insurance—particularly fantasy sports insurance which protects participants in the event of a fantasy athlete’s injury—has prompted a new question in insurance law: is fantasy sports insurance really “insurance?” This question is especially prevalent in Connecticut—a state that has contemplated legalizing sports betting and recognizes the carve out for legalized fantasy sports games. Because fantasy sports insurance—such as the coverage underwritten by Fantasy Player Protect and Rotosurance—satisfy the elements of insurance, fantasy sports insurance must be regulated accordingly. In addition, the Connecticut legislature must take an active role in considering what it means for fantasy participants to “hedge their bets:” carefully balancing public policy with potential economic benefits. * B.A. Political Science and Law, Science, and Technology in the Accelerated Program in Law, University of Connecticut (CT) (2019). J.D. Candidate, May 2021, University of Connecticut School of Law; Editor-in-Chief, Volume 27, Connecticut Insurance Law Journal.
    [Show full text]
  • A GUIDE to MAHJONG - Chinese / Official International Rules TABLE of CONTENTS
    A GUIDE TO MAHJONG - Chinese / Official International Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS A GUIDE TO MAHJONG...................................................... 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................ 2 SHARING / UPDATING THIS DOCUMENT .......................... 5 INTRODUCTION TO MAHJONG .......................................... 6 UNDERSTANDING THE MAHJONG SET............................... 7 THE 3 SUITS ......................................................................................... 7 BAMBOOS............................................................................................ 7 CHARACTERS ....................................................................................... 7 DOTS.................................................................................................. 7 THE 4 DIRECTIONAL TILES.................................................................... 8 THE 3 CARDINAL TILES ......................................................................... 8 THE 8 OPTIONAL FLOWER AND SEASON TILES....................................... 8 STARTING A GAME...........................................................10 THE ORDER OF PLAY ........................................................................... 10 MAKING THE WALL ............................................................................. 10 BREAKING THE WALL .......................................................................... 11 THE DEAD WALL.................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Illegal Gambling Faqs the Gaming Control Division
    Illegal Gambling FAQs The Gaming Control Division investigates illegal gambling in Indiana. Below are some of the Frequently Asked Questions posed to our Officers. If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to ask. You can email via the “Contact Us” tab on our website or call 317-233- 0046. 1. What are the laws that make gambling illegal? Illegal gambling laws may be found in Indiana Code 35-45-5. 2. How do I provide information on illegal gambling? The Gaming Control Division keeps sources of all information and tips confidential. To help us reduce illegal gambling in Indiana, please call 1-(866) 610-TIPS (8477) or utilize the “Contact Us” tab on our website. 3. What is the definition of gambling? "Gambling" means risking money or other property for gain, contingent in whole or in part upon lot, chance, or the operation of a gambling device. If one of these elements of the gambling definition is removed, then the activity is legal. 4. Are card games, such as poker, games of chance? Yes. The illegal gambling statute specifically provides that “a card game or an electronic version of a card game is a game of chance and may not be considered a bona fide contest of skill.” See IC 35-45-5-1(l). Thus, games like poker and euchre are considered gambling if played for money. 5. What is a bona fide game of skill? Bona fide games of skill include games where one can control the results or enhance their abilities through training. Examples include: sporting events, memory games, golf, horseshoes, darts, pool, scrabble, and trivia.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Steps Towards a Game of Skill Licence a Guide to Forthcoming Game of Skill with Prize Regulations in Malta for Fantasy Sports
    10 STEPS TOWARDS A GAME OF SKILL LICENCE A GUIDE TO FORTHCOMING GAME OF SKILL WITH PRIZE REGULATIONS IN MALTA FOR FANTASY SPORTS Executive Summary This is a guide to securing a Maltese ‘game of skill with prize’ licence for a Daily Fantasy Sports (DFS) operator or similar online gaming company. It is based on forthcoming regulations due in 2017, which are currently under development. As such, the steps outlined in this document are suggestions based on what is currently known about the new regulations and what operators can be doing before they come into effect. Disclaimer: This document is based on proposed legislation which has not yet been finalised. As such, the accuracy of the information in this document cannot be guaranteed and some assumptions have been made based on existing legislation. Readers should be cautious about how the information contained herein is used and, as always, should take formal advice from a professional advisor before making business decisions. Page 1 Find more resources at bostonmfo.com Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 The Development of the New Regulations ................................................................................................................................ 3 The Potential Benefits of the New Regulations ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mahjong and Mathematics
    Mahjong and mathematics Chi-Kwong Li Chi-Kwong Li Mahjong and mathematics Describe some background about the mahjong game. One may see how cultural exchange happened. Study some of its mathematical aspects. Learn the connection between mathematics and other activities. Describe some related research opportunities. See how some research problems arise. Objectives of the presentation/expected learning outcomes Chi-Kwong Li Mahjong and mathematics One may see how cultural exchange happened. Study some of its mathematical aspects. Learn the connection between mathematics and other activities. Describe some related research opportunities. See how some research problems arise. Objectives of the presentation/expected learning outcomes Describe some background about the mahjong game. Chi-Kwong Li Mahjong and mathematics Study some of its mathematical aspects. Learn the connection between mathematics and other activities. Describe some related research opportunities. See how some research problems arise. Objectives of the presentation/expected learning outcomes Describe some background about the mahjong game. One may see how cultural exchange happened. Chi-Kwong Li Mahjong and mathematics Learn the connection between mathematics and other activities. Describe some related research opportunities. See how some research problems arise. Objectives of the presentation/expected learning outcomes Describe some background about the mahjong game. One may see how cultural exchange happened. Study some of its mathematical aspects. Chi-Kwong Li Mahjong and mathematics Describe some related research opportunities. See how some research problems arise. Objectives of the presentation/expected learning outcomes Describe some background about the mahjong game. One may see how cultural exchange happened. Study some of its mathematical aspects. Learn the connection between mathematics and other activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Filed: New York County Clerk 11/17/2015 10:18 Am Index No
    FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/17/2015 10:18 AM INDEX NO. 453054/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/17/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------X THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, Attorney General of the State of New York, Index No. Plaintiffs, IAS Part________________ -against- Assigned to Justice________ MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION DraftKings, Inc., Defendant. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------X MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Preliminary Statement The New York State Constitution has prohibited bookmaking and other forms of sports gambling since 1894. Under New York law, a wager constitutes gambling when it depends on either a (1) “future contingent event not under [the bettor’s] control or influence” or (2) “contest of chance.” So-called Daily Fantasy Sports (“DFS”) wagers fit squarely in both these definitions, though by meeting just one of the two definitions DFS would be considered gambling. DFS is nothing more than a rebranding of sports betting. It is plainly illegal. The two dominant DFS operators, FanDuel and DraftKings, offer rapid-fire contests in which players can bet on the performance of a “lineup” of real athletes on a given day, weekend, or week. The contests are streamlined for instant-gratification, letting bettors risk up to $10,600 per wager and enter contests for a chance to win jackpots upwards of $1 million. The DFS operators themselves profit from every bet, taking a “rake” or a “vig” from all wagering on their sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Slot) Future Is Now
    Senate Bill 9 Comes to Life: The (Slot) Future Is Now By A.C. Ansani This article (i) explores the groundbreaking 2015 legislation that changed Nevada gaming laws as applicable to slot machines; (ii) provides practice pointers for gaming practitioners; and (iii) considers business opportunities for clients in the gaming operator and gaming manufacturing sectors. CONT. ON PAGE 31 NEVADA GAMING LAWYER | SEPTEMBER 2016 30 SEA CHANGE (e) Accommodate secure “The continued growth account wagering and May 21, 2016, marked the one and success of the transactions using gaming industry in the year anniversary of Nevada electronic commerce; and State of Nevada depend Governor Brian Sandoval on the fostering of a announcing that he signed (f) Require, when applicable, business and regulatory Senate Bill 9 (SB 9) originated appropriate information to environment that during the 78th Regular be disclosed to a player promotes continued explaining the outcome of Session of the Nevada State advances in the use of a game will be affected by Legislature into law. technology in gaming, skill or identifiers. 2 Specifically, SB 9 amends which improves the Chapter 463 of the Nevada While SB 9 can be applicable entertainment Revised Statues by requiring to any form of game found in a experience, encourages the Nevada Gaming Nevada casino, whether a card innovation and supports Commission, with advice game, dice game, or a roulette expansion of the and assistance from the wheel, this legislation is domestic technology Nevada Gaming Control expected to drastically change section of the economy Board, to “adopt regulations the type of slot machines that of this State.” 4 which encourage manufacturers can be deployed in the state.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Legality of Thoroughbred Handicapping Contests Under Conflicting State Law Regimes Laura A
    Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law Volume 1 | Issue 1 Article 2 2008 No Contest? An Analysis of the Legality of Thoroughbred Handicapping Contests under Conflicting State Law Regimes Laura A. D'Angelo Wyatt, aT rrant & Combs, LLP Daniel I. Waxman Wyatt, aT rrant & Combs, LLP Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kjeanrl Part of the Gaming Law Commons Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits oy u. Recommended Citation D'Angelo, Laura A. and Waxman, Daniel I. (2008) "No Contest? An Analysis of the Legality of Thoroughbred Handicapping Contests under Conflicting State Law Regimes," Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law: Vol. 1 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kjeanrl/vol1/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. No CONTEST? AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEGALITY OF THOROUGHBRED HANDICAPPING CONTESTS UNDER CONFLICTING STATE LAW REGIMES LAURA A. D'ANGELO* DANIEL I. WAXMAN** The traditional gaming market-share held by thoroughbred horse race wagering has significantly eroded over the past several years' due to the increased availability of mainstream gambling alternatives (i.e. land- based casinos and internet poker rooms).' The popularity and availability of alternative
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of SKILL-BASED Gaming Regulation
    The Rise of SKILL-BASED Gaming Regulation BY CHRISTIAN J. FISHER decade of social networks, smart phones, outcomes based on “identifiers,” which are specific and veri- social gaming, traditional video games and fiable facts based on objective criteria and are discussed in motion-based video games has created a detail below; and required disclosures that game outcomes A may be affected by skill or identifiers. the legislation defines generation of consumers—Millennials— “game of skill” as a game in which the skill (knowledge, who do not favor slot machines as much as prior genera- dexterity or any other ability or expertise) of the player, tions, and thus, has created a dilemma for land-based rather than chance, is the dominant factor in affecting the casino operators—how to attract Millennials to their outcome of the game over a period of continuous play, and casinos, and more importantly, onto the gaming floor. also “hybrid games” as games in which a combination of skill and chance affects the outcome. In september 2015, the Commission adopted amend- the decline in popularity of slot machines, and the ments to regulation 14 (“Amendments”) to address skill- resulting effect on gaming revenue, is evident in nevada. based gaming. under the Amendments, skill-based games statewide, nevada gaming revenue reached its peak in 2007 may use an identifier to determine which games are at approximately $12.8 billion, with 174,677 slot machine presented to or available for selection by a player. the units in play within the state.1 las Vegas strip gaming Amendments also envision inter-casino linked systems of revenue also reached its peak in 2007 at approximately $6.8 games of skill or hybrid games, including progressive pay- billion, with 49,891 slot machine units in play.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward Legalization of Poker: the Skill Vs. Chance Debate Robert C
    Toward Legalization of Poker: The Skill vs. Chance Debate Robert C. Hannum* Anthony N. Cabot Abstract This paper sheds light on the age-old argument as to whether poker is a game in which skill predominates over chance or vice versa. Recent work addressing the issue of skill vs. chance is reviewed. This current study considers two different scenarios to address the issue: 1) a mathematical analysis supported by computer simulations of one random player and one skilled player in Texas Hold'Em, and 2) full-table simulation games of Texas Hold'Em and Seven Card Stud. Findings for scenario 1 showed the skilled player winning 97 percent of the hands. Findings for scenario 2 further reinforced that highly skilled players convincingly beat unskilled players. Following this study that shows poker as predominantly a skill game, various gaming jurisdictions might declare poker as such, thus legalizing and broadening the game for new venues, new markets, new demographics, and new media. Internet gaming in particular could be expanded and released from its current illegality in the U.S. with benefits accruing to casinos who wish to offer online poker. Keywords: Poker, games of skill, games of chance, mathematics The game of poker has become enormously popular over the last decade, in large part due to significantly increased Internet and television exposure. Tournament poker, in particular, has become a viable spectator sport with the advent of specialized cameras that allow the television audience to view the hidden cards of the players. This increased popularity and the uneven legal standing of the game in various jurisdictions has resulted in considerable media attention as well as debates over whether certain forms of poker should be legalized.
    [Show full text]
  • Poker As a Game of Skill Start with the Worst Hand, and It’S All Uphill by Adam Ross *
    Competitive Enterprise Institute 1899 L Street, NW • 12 t h Floor • Washington, DC 20036 202.331.1010 • www.cei.org Advancing Liberty – From the Economy to Ecology February 19, 2009 No. 150 Poker as a Game of Skill Start with the worst hand, and it’s all uphill By Adam Ross * There’s no luck in poker, not even in a single hand. All that poker is is a decision- making exercise. If you’re a better decision maker than your opponents on whether to bet, raise, or fold or call, or how much you’re supposed to raise, that’s what it’s about...If I’m better in making those decisions than you are then I’m going to win. – Annie Duke, Top Professional Poker Player 1 It’s two minutes before the cards are in the air, and my heart is racing. I look around at the competition—faces I recognize from TV—and the excitement is palpable. To my left is Barry Greenstein, a world-class poker star who has won millions of dollars in tournaments and countless more in endorsements. To my right is David “The Dragon” Pham, another seasoned pro who, although less well known outside the poker world than Greenstein, is perhaps the most successful tournament player of the past two years. Other top pros at my table include Nam Le, Allen Kessler, and Anna Wroblewski. This is day two of the Legends of Poker No-Limit Challenge at the Bicycle Casino in Southern California. Of the original 100 entrants—mostly top pros, but also a few amateurs like me—27 players remain.
    [Show full text]