10 Steps Towards a Game of Skill Licence a Guide to Forthcoming Game of Skill with Prize Regulations in Malta for Fantasy Sports
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Act 328 of 1931 CHAPTER XLIV GAMBLING 750.301 Accepting Money Or Valuable Thing Contingent on Uncertain Event
THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT) Act 328 of 1931 CHAPTER XLIV GAMBLING 750.301 Accepting money or valuable thing contingent on uncertain event. Sec. 301. Any person or his or her agent or employee who, directly or indirectly, takes, receives, or accepts from any person any money or valuable thing with the agreement, understanding or allegation that any money or valuable thing will be paid or delivered to any person where the payment or delivery is alleged to be or will be contingent upon the result of any race, contest, or game or upon the happening of any event not known by the parties to be certain, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 1 year or a fine of not more than $1,000.00. History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931;CL 1948, 750.301;Am. 2002, Act 672, Eff. Mar. 31, 2003. Former law: See sections 1 and 11 of Act 176 of 1925, being CL 1929, §§ 9121 and 9131. 750.302 Keeping or occupying common gambling house or building or place where gaming permitted; apparatus used for gaming or gambling; manufacture or possession of gaming or gambling apparatus for sale. Sec. 302. (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), any person, or his or her agent or employee who, directly or indirectly, keeps, occupies, or assists in keeping or occupying any common gambling house or any building or place where gaming is permitted or suffered or who suffers or permits on any premises owned, occupied, or controlled by him or her any apparatus used for gaming or gambling or who shall use such apparatus for gaming or gambling in any place within this state, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 1 year or a fine of not more than $1,000.00. -
Hedging Your Bets: Is Fantasy Sports Betting Insurance Really ‘Insurance’?
HEDGING YOUR BETS: IS FANTASY SPORTS BETTING INSURANCE REALLY ‘INSURANCE’? Haley A. Hinton* I. INTRODUCTION Sports betting is an animal of both the past and the future: it goes through the ebbs and flows of federal and state regulations and provides both positive and negative repercussions to society. While opponents note the adverse effects of sports betting on the integrity of professional and collegiate sporting events and gambling habits, proponents point to massive public interest, the benefits to state economies, and the embracement among many professional sports leagues. Fantasy sports gaming has engaged people from all walks of life and created its own culture and industry by allowing participants to manage their own fictional professional teams from home. Sports betting insurance—particularly fantasy sports insurance which protects participants in the event of a fantasy athlete’s injury—has prompted a new question in insurance law: is fantasy sports insurance really “insurance?” This question is especially prevalent in Connecticut—a state that has contemplated legalizing sports betting and recognizes the carve out for legalized fantasy sports games. Because fantasy sports insurance—such as the coverage underwritten by Fantasy Player Protect and Rotosurance—satisfy the elements of insurance, fantasy sports insurance must be regulated accordingly. In addition, the Connecticut legislature must take an active role in considering what it means for fantasy participants to “hedge their bets:” carefully balancing public policy with potential economic benefits. * B.A. Political Science and Law, Science, and Technology in the Accelerated Program in Law, University of Connecticut (CT) (2019). J.D. Candidate, May 2021, University of Connecticut School of Law; Editor-in-Chief, Volume 27, Connecticut Insurance Law Journal. -
A GUIDE to MAHJONG - Chinese / Official International Rules TABLE of CONTENTS
A GUIDE TO MAHJONG - Chinese / Official International Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS A GUIDE TO MAHJONG...................................................... 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................ 2 SHARING / UPDATING THIS DOCUMENT .......................... 5 INTRODUCTION TO MAHJONG .......................................... 6 UNDERSTANDING THE MAHJONG SET............................... 7 THE 3 SUITS ......................................................................................... 7 BAMBOOS............................................................................................ 7 CHARACTERS ....................................................................................... 7 DOTS.................................................................................................. 7 THE 4 DIRECTIONAL TILES.................................................................... 8 THE 3 CARDINAL TILES ......................................................................... 8 THE 8 OPTIONAL FLOWER AND SEASON TILES....................................... 8 STARTING A GAME...........................................................10 THE ORDER OF PLAY ........................................................................... 10 MAKING THE WALL ............................................................................. 10 BREAKING THE WALL .......................................................................... 11 THE DEAD WALL................................................................................. -
Illegal Gambling Faqs the Gaming Control Division
Illegal Gambling FAQs The Gaming Control Division investigates illegal gambling in Indiana. Below are some of the Frequently Asked Questions posed to our Officers. If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to ask. You can email via the “Contact Us” tab on our website or call 317-233- 0046. 1. What are the laws that make gambling illegal? Illegal gambling laws may be found in Indiana Code 35-45-5. 2. How do I provide information on illegal gambling? The Gaming Control Division keeps sources of all information and tips confidential. To help us reduce illegal gambling in Indiana, please call 1-(866) 610-TIPS (8477) or utilize the “Contact Us” tab on our website. 3. What is the definition of gambling? "Gambling" means risking money or other property for gain, contingent in whole or in part upon lot, chance, or the operation of a gambling device. If one of these elements of the gambling definition is removed, then the activity is legal. 4. Are card games, such as poker, games of chance? Yes. The illegal gambling statute specifically provides that “a card game or an electronic version of a card game is a game of chance and may not be considered a bona fide contest of skill.” See IC 35-45-5-1(l). Thus, games like poker and euchre are considered gambling if played for money. 5. What is a bona fide game of skill? Bona fide games of skill include games where one can control the results or enhance their abilities through training. Examples include: sporting events, memory games, golf, horseshoes, darts, pool, scrabble, and trivia. -
Mahjong and Mathematics
Mahjong and mathematics Chi-Kwong Li Chi-Kwong Li Mahjong and mathematics Describe some background about the mahjong game. One may see how cultural exchange happened. Study some of its mathematical aspects. Learn the connection between mathematics and other activities. Describe some related research opportunities. See how some research problems arise. Objectives of the presentation/expected learning outcomes Chi-Kwong Li Mahjong and mathematics One may see how cultural exchange happened. Study some of its mathematical aspects. Learn the connection between mathematics and other activities. Describe some related research opportunities. See how some research problems arise. Objectives of the presentation/expected learning outcomes Describe some background about the mahjong game. Chi-Kwong Li Mahjong and mathematics Study some of its mathematical aspects. Learn the connection between mathematics and other activities. Describe some related research opportunities. See how some research problems arise. Objectives of the presentation/expected learning outcomes Describe some background about the mahjong game. One may see how cultural exchange happened. Chi-Kwong Li Mahjong and mathematics Learn the connection between mathematics and other activities. Describe some related research opportunities. See how some research problems arise. Objectives of the presentation/expected learning outcomes Describe some background about the mahjong game. One may see how cultural exchange happened. Study some of its mathematical aspects. Chi-Kwong Li Mahjong and mathematics Describe some related research opportunities. See how some research problems arise. Objectives of the presentation/expected learning outcomes Describe some background about the mahjong game. One may see how cultural exchange happened. Study some of its mathematical aspects. Learn the connection between mathematics and other activities. -
Filed: New York County Clerk 11/17/2015 10:18 Am Index No
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/17/2015 10:18 AM INDEX NO. 453054/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/17/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------X THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, Attorney General of the State of New York, Index No. Plaintiffs, IAS Part________________ -against- Assigned to Justice________ MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION DraftKings, Inc., Defendant. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------X MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Preliminary Statement The New York State Constitution has prohibited bookmaking and other forms of sports gambling since 1894. Under New York law, a wager constitutes gambling when it depends on either a (1) “future contingent event not under [the bettor’s] control or influence” or (2) “contest of chance.” So-called Daily Fantasy Sports (“DFS”) wagers fit squarely in both these definitions, though by meeting just one of the two definitions DFS would be considered gambling. DFS is nothing more than a rebranding of sports betting. It is plainly illegal. The two dominant DFS operators, FanDuel and DraftKings, offer rapid-fire contests in which players can bet on the performance of a “lineup” of real athletes on a given day, weekend, or week. The contests are streamlined for instant-gratification, letting bettors risk up to $10,600 per wager and enter contests for a chance to win jackpots upwards of $1 million. The DFS operators themselves profit from every bet, taking a “rake” or a “vig” from all wagering on their sites. -
Slot) Future Is Now
Senate Bill 9 Comes to Life: The (Slot) Future Is Now By A.C. Ansani This article (i) explores the groundbreaking 2015 legislation that changed Nevada gaming laws as applicable to slot machines; (ii) provides practice pointers for gaming practitioners; and (iii) considers business opportunities for clients in the gaming operator and gaming manufacturing sectors. CONT. ON PAGE 31 NEVADA GAMING LAWYER | SEPTEMBER 2016 30 SEA CHANGE (e) Accommodate secure “The continued growth account wagering and May 21, 2016, marked the one and success of the transactions using gaming industry in the year anniversary of Nevada electronic commerce; and State of Nevada depend Governor Brian Sandoval on the fostering of a announcing that he signed (f) Require, when applicable, business and regulatory Senate Bill 9 (SB 9) originated appropriate information to environment that during the 78th Regular be disclosed to a player promotes continued explaining the outcome of Session of the Nevada State advances in the use of a game will be affected by Legislature into law. technology in gaming, skill or identifiers. 2 Specifically, SB 9 amends which improves the Chapter 463 of the Nevada While SB 9 can be applicable entertainment Revised Statues by requiring to any form of game found in a experience, encourages the Nevada Gaming Nevada casino, whether a card innovation and supports Commission, with advice game, dice game, or a roulette expansion of the and assistance from the wheel, this legislation is domestic technology Nevada Gaming Control expected to drastically change section of the economy Board, to “adopt regulations the type of slot machines that of this State.” 4 which encourage manufacturers can be deployed in the state. -
An Analysis of the Legality of Thoroughbred Handicapping Contests Under Conflicting State Law Regimes Laura A
Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law Volume 1 | Issue 1 Article 2 2008 No Contest? An Analysis of the Legality of Thoroughbred Handicapping Contests under Conflicting State Law Regimes Laura A. D'Angelo Wyatt, aT rrant & Combs, LLP Daniel I. Waxman Wyatt, aT rrant & Combs, LLP Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kjeanrl Part of the Gaming Law Commons Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits oy u. Recommended Citation D'Angelo, Laura A. and Waxman, Daniel I. (2008) "No Contest? An Analysis of the Legality of Thoroughbred Handicapping Contests under Conflicting State Law Regimes," Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law: Vol. 1 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kjeanrl/vol1/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. No CONTEST? AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEGALITY OF THOROUGHBRED HANDICAPPING CONTESTS UNDER CONFLICTING STATE LAW REGIMES LAURA A. D'ANGELO* DANIEL I. WAXMAN** The traditional gaming market-share held by thoroughbred horse race wagering has significantly eroded over the past several years' due to the increased availability of mainstream gambling alternatives (i.e. land- based casinos and internet poker rooms).' The popularity and availability of alternative -
0752H11.04H Sb 153
0752H11.04H SB 153 House _______________________________________________________ Amendment NO.____ Offered By _____________________________________ ___________________________________ 1 AMEND House Committee Substitute for Senate Substitute for Senate Committee Substitute for 2 Senate Bill Nos. 153 & 97, Page 37, Section 287.245, Line 33, by inserting after all of said section 3 and line the following: 4 5 "313.800. 1. As used in sections 313.800 to 313.850, unless the context clearly requires 6 otherwise, the following terms mean: 7 (1) "Adjusted gross receipts", the gross receipts from licensed gambling games and devices 8 less winnings paid to wagerers. "Adjusted gross receipts" shall not include adjusted gross receipts 9 from sports wagering as defined in section 313.1000; 10 (2) "Applicant", any person applying for a license authorized under the provisions of 11 sections 313.800 to 313.850; 12 (3) "Bank", the elevations of ground which confine the waters of the Mississippi or Missouri 13 Rivers at the ordinary high water mark as defined by common law; 14 (4) "Capital, cultural, and special law enforcement purpose expenditures" shall include any 15 disbursement, including disbursements for principal, interest, and costs of issuance and trustee 16 administration related to any indebtedness, for the acquisition of land, land improvements, buildings 17 and building improvements, vehicles, machinery, equipment, works of art, intersections, signing, 18 signalization, parking lot, bus stop, station, garage, terminal, hanger, shelter, dock, -
The Rise of SKILL-BASED Gaming Regulation
The Rise of SKILL-BASED Gaming Regulation BY CHRISTIAN J. FISHER decade of social networks, smart phones, outcomes based on “identifiers,” which are specific and veri- social gaming, traditional video games and fiable facts based on objective criteria and are discussed in motion-based video games has created a detail below; and required disclosures that game outcomes A may be affected by skill or identifiers. the legislation defines generation of consumers—Millennials— “game of skill” as a game in which the skill (knowledge, who do not favor slot machines as much as prior genera- dexterity or any other ability or expertise) of the player, tions, and thus, has created a dilemma for land-based rather than chance, is the dominant factor in affecting the casino operators—how to attract Millennials to their outcome of the game over a period of continuous play, and casinos, and more importantly, onto the gaming floor. also “hybrid games” as games in which a combination of skill and chance affects the outcome. In september 2015, the Commission adopted amend- the decline in popularity of slot machines, and the ments to regulation 14 (“Amendments”) to address skill- resulting effect on gaming revenue, is evident in nevada. based gaming. under the Amendments, skill-based games statewide, nevada gaming revenue reached its peak in 2007 may use an identifier to determine which games are at approximately $12.8 billion, with 174,677 slot machine presented to or available for selection by a player. the units in play within the state.1 las Vegas strip gaming Amendments also envision inter-casino linked systems of revenue also reached its peak in 2007 at approximately $6.8 games of skill or hybrid games, including progressive pay- billion, with 49,891 slot machine units in play. -
Toward Legalization of Poker: the Skill Vs. Chance Debate Robert C
Toward Legalization of Poker: The Skill vs. Chance Debate Robert C. Hannum* Anthony N. Cabot Abstract This paper sheds light on the age-old argument as to whether poker is a game in which skill predominates over chance or vice versa. Recent work addressing the issue of skill vs. chance is reviewed. This current study considers two different scenarios to address the issue: 1) a mathematical analysis supported by computer simulations of one random player and one skilled player in Texas Hold'Em, and 2) full-table simulation games of Texas Hold'Em and Seven Card Stud. Findings for scenario 1 showed the skilled player winning 97 percent of the hands. Findings for scenario 2 further reinforced that highly skilled players convincingly beat unskilled players. Following this study that shows poker as predominantly a skill game, various gaming jurisdictions might declare poker as such, thus legalizing and broadening the game for new venues, new markets, new demographics, and new media. Internet gaming in particular could be expanded and released from its current illegality in the U.S. with benefits accruing to casinos who wish to offer online poker. Keywords: Poker, games of skill, games of chance, mathematics The game of poker has become enormously popular over the last decade, in large part due to significantly increased Internet and television exposure. Tournament poker, in particular, has become a viable spectator sport with the advent of specialized cameras that allow the television audience to view the hidden cards of the players. This increased popularity and the uneven legal standing of the game in various jurisdictions has resulted in considerable media attention as well as debates over whether certain forms of poker should be legalized. -
Poker As a Game of Skill Start with the Worst Hand, and It’S All Uphill by Adam Ross *
Competitive Enterprise Institute 1899 L Street, NW • 12 t h Floor • Washington, DC 20036 202.331.1010 • www.cei.org Advancing Liberty – From the Economy to Ecology February 19, 2009 No. 150 Poker as a Game of Skill Start with the worst hand, and it’s all uphill By Adam Ross * There’s no luck in poker, not even in a single hand. All that poker is is a decision- making exercise. If you’re a better decision maker than your opponents on whether to bet, raise, or fold or call, or how much you’re supposed to raise, that’s what it’s about...If I’m better in making those decisions than you are then I’m going to win. – Annie Duke, Top Professional Poker Player 1 It’s two minutes before the cards are in the air, and my heart is racing. I look around at the competition—faces I recognize from TV—and the excitement is palpable. To my left is Barry Greenstein, a world-class poker star who has won millions of dollars in tournaments and countless more in endorsements. To my right is David “The Dragon” Pham, another seasoned pro who, although less well known outside the poker world than Greenstein, is perhaps the most successful tournament player of the past two years. Other top pros at my table include Nam Le, Allen Kessler, and Anna Wroblewski. This is day two of the Legends of Poker No-Limit Challenge at the Bicycle Casino in Southern California. Of the original 100 entrants—mostly top pros, but also a few amateurs like me—27 players remain.