Buckinghamshire. [Kelly's
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
North Bucks Rripple (Ramblers Repairing & Improving Public Paths
North Bucks rRIPPLE (ramblers Repairing & Improving Public Paths for Leisure & Exercise) Activity Report 22 September 2016 – 13 November 2016 Before & after photos of all work are available on request. Man hours include some travel time. DaG = Donate a Gate. CAMS is a reference used by BCC/Ringway Jacobs for work requests. All work is requested and authorised by Alastair McVail, Ringway Jacobs, North Bucks RoW Officer, or Jon Clark, BCC Access Officer. 22/9/16 Took delivery of 7 Marlow and 3 Woodstock kissing gates from BCC/TfB at CRFC. Good chat with Greg & Bill of TfB regarding gate installation and their preferred installation method using a timber post attached to either side of a gate. Not so critical with kissing gates. 22/9/16 Stewkley. Emailed Alastair McVail re the replacement by TfB of our gate with a kissing gate at SP842264 to appease Mrs Carter. (See 9/8/16 CAMS 81198). 23/9/16 Eythrop. Emailed Jon Clark reCAMS 81845 at SP768134 completed on 3/2/16 as way marker has been knocked down again. 26/9/16 Eythrop. Received CAMS 83629 at SP768134 to rerect snapped of at ground level way marker post - hit by a vehicle. 27/9/16 Mentmore. CAMS 82567 at SP907186 on MEN/8/1 installed way mark post and bridleway way marker discs. Liaised with golf club groundsman, Adam. Two x 2.5 = 5.0 man hours. B&J. 27/9/16 Mentmore. CAMS 82569 at SP889192 and at SP892194 on MEM/15/2. Checked functioning of two timber kissing gates. First one needed timber attaching to post to prevent gate from swinging right through, second considered to be okay. -
The Hidation of Buckinghamshire. Keith Bailey
THE HIDA TION OF BUCKINGHAMSHIRE KEITH BAILEY In a pioneering paper Mr Bailey here subjects the Domesday data on the hidation of Buckinghamshire to a searching statistical analysis, using techniques never before applied to this county. His aim is not explain the hide, but to lay a foundation on which an explanation may be built; to isolate what is truly exceptional and therefore calls for further study. Although he disclaims any intention of going beyond analysis, his paper will surely advance our understanding of a very important feature of early English society. Part 1: Domesday Book 'What was the hide?' F. W. Maitland, in posing purposes for which it may be asked shows just 'this dreary old question' in his seminal study of how difficult it is to reach a consensus. It is Domesday Book,1 was right in saying that it almost, one might say, a Holy Grail, and sub• is in fact central to many of the great questions ject to many interpretations designed to fit this of early English history. He was echoed by or that theory about Anglo-Saxon society, its Baring a few years later, who wrote, 'the hide is origins and structures. grown somewhat tiresome, but we cannot well neglect it, for on no other Saxon institution In view of the large number of scholars who have we so many details, if we can but decipher have contributed to the subject, further discus• 2 them'. Many subsequent scholars have also sion might appear redundant. So it would be directed their attention to this subject: A. -
1 Buckinghamshire; a Military History by Ian F. W. Beckett
Buckinghamshire; A Military History by Ian F. W. Beckett 1 Chapter One: Origins to 1603 Although it is generally accepted that a truly national system of defence originated in England with the first militia statutes of 1558, there are continuities with earlier defence arrangements. One Edwardian historian claimed that the origins of the militia lay in the forces gathered by Cassivelaunus to oppose Caesar’s second landing in Britain in 54 BC. 1 This stretches credulity but military obligations or, more correctly, common burdens imposed on able bodied freemen do date from the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms of the seventh and eight centuries. The supposedly resulting fyrd - simply the old English word for army - was not a genuine ‘nation in arms’ in the way suggested by Victorian historians but much more of a selective force of nobles and followers serving on a rotating basis. 2 The celebrated Burghal Hidage dating from the reign of Edward the Elder sometime after 914 AD but generally believed to reflect arrangements put in place by Alfred the Great does suggest significant ability to raise manpower at least among the West Saxons for the garrisoning of 30 fortified burghs on the basis of men levied from the acreage apportioned to each burgh. 3 In theory, it is possible that one in every four of all able-bodied men were liable for such garrison service. 4 Equally, while most surviving documentation dates only from 1 G. J. Hay, An Epitomised History of the Militia: The Military Lifebuoy, 54 BC to AD 1905 (London: United Services Gazette, 1905), 10. -
Steeple Claydon and Verney Junction EWR Phase 2 Newsletter
East West Rail Phase Two Project Newsletter Steeple Claydon & Verney Junction, Autumn 2020 Welcome! Enabling works underway Welcome to the Autumn issue of the East West Rail Alliance project newsletter. I wanted to start by thanking everyone who took the time to read and share the last issue of the newsletter. We have seen an increase in the readership of the newsletter and have received feedback on the format with the level of information in the local update sections we introduced in issue two being positive. As you’ll read below, perhaps the most obvious progress we have made since the last newsletter can be seen in Bletchley, where our team has dismantled sections of the Bletchley Flyover ready for it to be rebuilt to modern standards. The dismantling has demanded a meticulous amount of Since the last issue of our newsletter, the Alliance has planning from our team, Network Rail operations, the been preparing many areas across the project footprint for train operating companies, local authorities and our main construction activities to begin. Highways environment agencies and I’m delighted to report all the improvements have been made, with roads widened, lifts were safely completed in line with our programme. passing bays on narrow roads put in place, and access We are now in the process of removing the final points for our site compounds installed. In addition, we elements of the structure that need to be removed have been constructing ‘haul roads’, which will enable before we can start the rebuild process in construction traffic to travel between certain areas of the November/later this year. -
(Public Pack)Agenda Document for Winslow & Villages Community
Winslow & Villages Community Board agenda Date: Thursday 26 November 2020 Time: 7.00 pm Venue: MS Teams Membership: S Renshell (Chairman), J Chilver, B Everitt, L Monger, S Raven and Sir B Stanier Bt Addington Parish Meeting; Adstock Parish Council; Beachampton Parish Council; Drayton Parslow Parish Council; Dunton Parish Meeting; Granborough Parish Council; Great Brickhill Parish Council; Great Horwood Parish Council; Hoggeston Parish Meeting; Little Horwood Parish Council; Mursley Parish Council; Nash Parish Council; Newton Longville Parish Council; North Marston Parish Council; Oving Parish Council; Padbury Parish Council; Pitchcott Parish Meeting; Soulbury Parish Council; Stewkley Parish Council; Stoke Hammond Parish Council; Swanbourne Parish Council; Thornton Parish Meeting; Whaddon Parish Council; Winslow Parish Council Please note that this meeting will be recorded and will subsequently be available to view via the Buckinghamshire Council website. Agenda Item Time Page No 1 Apologies To note any apologies for absence. 2 Minutes 3 - 8 To approve as a correct record the minutes of the meeting held on 29 September, 2020. 3 Declarations of Interest To note any declarations of interest. 4 Chairman’s Welcome Introduction from Sue Renshell, Chairman of the Winslow and Villages Community Board. 5 Introduction from Martin Dickman Introduction from Martin Dickman, Service Director, Neighbourhood Services. 6 Response to Petition 9 - 12 To note the response to the petition submitted by Great Horwood Parish Council. 7 Funding Update 13 - 30 The Community Board will receive a presentation on funding. 8 Action Group Updates The Action Groups will provide a verbal update to the Community Board. 9 COVID Workshop Presentations and discussions on COVID. -
Buckingham Share As at 16 July 2021
Deanery Share Statement : 2021 allocation 3AM AMERSHAM 2021 Cash Recd Bal as at % Paid Share To Date 16-Jul-21 To Date A/C No Parish £ £ £ % S4642 AMERSHAM ON THE HILL 75,869 44,973 30,896 59.3 DD S4645 AMERSHAM w COLESHILL 93,366 55,344 38,022 59.3 DD S4735 BEACONSFIELD ST MARY, MICHAEL & THOMAS 244,244 144,755 99,489 59.3 DD S4936 CHALFONT ST GILES 82,674 48,998 33,676 59.3 DD S4939 CHALFONT ST PETER 88,520 52,472 36,048 59.3 DD S4971 CHENIES & LITTLE CHALFONT 73,471 43,544 29,927 59.3 DD S4974 CHESHAM BOIS 87,147 51,654 35,493 59.3 DD S5134 DENHAM 70,048 41,515 28,533 59.3 DD S5288 FLAUNDEN 20,011 11,809 8,202 59.0 DD S5324 GERRARDS CROSS & FULMER 224,363 132,995 91,368 59.3 DD S5351 GREAT CHESHAM 239,795 142,118 97,677 59.3 DD S5629 LATIMER 17,972 7,218 10,754 40.2 DD S5970 PENN 46,370 27,487 18,883 59.3 DD S5971 PENN STREET w HOLMER GREEN 70,729 41,919 28,810 59.3 DD S6086 SEER GREEN 75,518 42,680 32,838 56.5 DD S6391 TYLERS GREEN 41,428 24,561 16,867 59.3 DD S6694 AMERSHAM DEANERY 5,976 5,976 0 0.0 Deanery Totals 1,557,501 920,018 637,483 59.1 R:\Store\Finance\FINANCE\2021\Share 2021\Share 2021Bucks Share20/07/202112:20 Deanery Share Statement : 2021 allocation 3AY AYLESBURY 2021 Cash Recd Bal as at % Paid Share To Date 16-Jul-21 To Date A/C No Parish £ £ £ % S4675 ASHENDON 5,108 2,975 2,133 58.2 DD S4693 ASTON SANDFORD 6,305 6,305 0 100.0 S4698 AYLESBURY ST MARY 49,527 23,000 26,527 46.4 S4699 AYLESBURY QUARRENDON ST PETER 7,711 4,492 3,219 58.3 DD S4700 AYLESBURY BIERTON 23,305 13,575 9,730 58.2 DD S4701 AYLESBURY HULCOTT ALL SAINTS -
210809 August Planning PC Agenda
Granborough Parish Council Clerk to the Council Mrs Victoria Firth All Councillors You are hereby summoned to the Meeting of Granborough Parish Council to be held on Monday 9th August 2021, in The Village Hall, commencing at 7.30pm for the purpose of transacting the following business: AGENDA 95. Receive Apologies; to accept apologies for absence 96. Open Forum for Parishioners; residents can comment on any item of council business 97. Declaration of interest in items on the agenda; To declare any interest in Agenda Items 98. To confirm the Minutes of the last meeting; 13th July 2021 99. Planning; a. To agree a Consultee response to application 21/02817/ALB at 17 Winslow Road, for proposed drainage works. b. To agree a Consultee response to application 21/02805/APP at 10 Church Lane for raised roof extension and new front porch. c. To agree a Consultee response to application 21/02960/APP at Land Off Hogshaw Road for conversion of timber barn for residential let or holiday let. d. To receive a status update from public access on planning book applications 100. Neighbourhood Plan; To endorse the Final Neighbourhood Plan document 101. Post and Consultations; a. Various NALC Communications and Updates b. 15/7 NBPPC Minutes c. 15/7 WAVCM Covid Briefings d. 16/7 BALC Annual Conference Notification e. 17/7 NBPPC various communications regarding involvement in future consultations f. 18/7 Unity Bank FSCS protection g. 23/7 2 year old funding communication h. 26/7 NBPPC – Changes to public access i. 28/7 Heart of Bucks Love Bucks Appeal j. -
Bucks Historic Churches Trust Sponsored Ride
BUCKS HISTORIC CHURCHES TRUST SPONSORED RIDE & STRIDE 2015 RESULTS Deanery 2015 Donations G/Aid Total 2014 Donations G/Aid Total Variation Amersham 3972.25 640.50 4612.75 3043.00 533.25 3576.25 1036.50 Aylesbury 4966.10 942.30 5908.40 5939.50 1171.75 7111.25 -1202.85 Buckingham 1645.00 259.25 1904.25 3167.50 614.00 3781.50 -1877.25 Burnham & Slough 2992.80 562.50 3555.30 3029.40 577.00 3606.40 -51.10 Claydon 3183.38 550.13 3733.51 2242.50 376.50 2619.00 1114.51 Milton Keynes 2191.00 391.75 2582.75 2487.40 388.85 2876.25 -293.50 Mursley 3082.49 609.00 3691.49 1818.00 210.88 2028.88 1662.62 Newport 2223.50 361.88 2585.38 2093.00 251.50 2344.50 240.88 Wendover 3244.28 639.38 3883.66 3808.40 677.85 4486.25 -602.60 Wycombe 3361.58 606.75 3968.33 2332.00 443.25 2775.25 1193.08 Donations Not Linked to a Deanery 165.00 41.25 206.25 4835.28 604.25 5439.53 -5233.28 Totals 31027.38 5604.68 36632.06 34795.98 5849.08 40645.06 -4013.00 Gift Aid % 18.06 16.81 Visitors Riders/Welcomers Amount AMERSHAM DEANERY Amersham on the Hill St Michael & All Angels 21 1 90.00 Amersham on the Hill Free (Baptist) 12 Amersham St Mary 4 7 462.00 Amersham on the Hill St John's, Methodist 7 Beaconsfield St Michael & All Angels 3 1 270.00 Beaconsfield St Mary & All Saints 4 Beaconsfield R C St Teresa, Warwick Rd 2 Beaconsfield U R C Aylesbury End 3 Beaconsfield Free Methodist,Shepherds Lane 3 Chalfont St Peter 9 2 170.00 Chalfont Goldhill Baptist 8 Hornhill St Pauls 2 Oval Way All Saints 2 Chenies St Michael 4 1 inc LC St George 583.00 Little Chalfont Methodist 3 199.00 -
Buckinghamshire
Archaeological Investigations Project 2003 Post-Determination & Non-Planning Related Projects South East BUCKINGHAMSHIRE Aylebury Vale 3/763 (E.11.M019) SP 73732250 MK18 3LA CLAYDON ROAD, HOGSHAW Watching Brief and Salvage Recording: Claydon Road, Hogshaw, Buckinghamshire Fell, D Milton Keynes : Archaeological Services & Consultancy Ltd., 2003, 39pp, colour pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Archaeological Services & Consultancy Ltd A number of archaeological remains were observed, notably a group of medieval buildings adjacent to Claydon Road, which may have been buildings associated with the Knights Hospitallers were also observed in the northern part of the site. A number of finds, including an assemblage of medieval pottery were also recorded. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: MD, PM 3/764 (E.11.Q003) SP 79303080 MK17 0PE 25 WOOD END, LITTLE HORWOOD Report on an Archaeological Watching Brief at Stables, 25 Wood End, Little Horwood, Buckinghamshire Lisboa, IMilton Keynes : Archaeologica, 2003, 27pp, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Archaeologica A watching brief identified four ditches and two pits of unknown date. Roman pottery was present with roof and floor tiles which could have suggested the location of a Roman building in the vicinity of the site. A flint knife, dating to the Neolithic/Early Bronze Age, was also present on the site. [AIP] SMR primary record number:BC20675, CAS Archaeological periods represented: PR, RO, UD 3/765 (E.11.M017) SP 79303070 MK17 0PE 3 WOOD END, LITTLE HORWOOD Watching Brief: 3 Wood End, Little Horwood, Buckinghamshire Hunn, J Milton Keynes : Archaeological Services & Consultancy Ltd., 2003, 18pp, colour pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Archaeological Services & Consultancy Ltd The site had been truncated in the past and the ground partly filled in with modern building rubble. -
Historic Landscape Charaterisation
Appendix 6 Analysis – Enclosure Regular Enclosures in Hoggeston parish, Vale of Aylesbury Buckinghamshire Historic Landscape Characterisation Appendix 6 Introduction Enclosed land comprises the most extensive HLC type representing over 72% of the land total. Its main use is for agriculture, a large proportion being for the pasturing of sheep and cattle. The type has a significant impact on aspects of the social and cultural life of the county, where both its form and maintenance are defining characteristics of the aesthetic appeal of the landscape, and is by turn a major influence upon matters such as tourism and planning. Pre 18th Century Enclosure accounts for 32.13% of enclosed land in Buckinghamshire, Parliamentary Enclosure for 28% and Modern Enclosure for 15%. Both the Pre 18th Century (Irregular Enclosure) and Post-Medieval Enclosure types have changed little in the last 150 years, especially when compared with the Modern Enclosure type. Most 20th Century Enclosure is an alteration of a previously enclosed landscape (greatly changed) with just 19% of hectares newly enclosed since the nineteenth century. The HLC mapping (see diagram below) suggests that most of the enclosed landscape has remained largely unchanged for at least 150 years, if not for considerably longer. However, the HLC process did not evaluate the continuing presence of smaller landscape features, such as barns and trees, or the composition of boundary type, boundary size, hedgerows and routeways. Nor did it assess the intrusive features of modern life, such as pylons, new roads, street lighting or other elements leading to the sub-urbanisation of the countryside. These may have a significant impact upon the appearance and condition of the landscape and all play an important part in shaping the landscape visible from the ground. -
Directory of Organisations Supporting Older People in Areas Around Buckingham¹
Directory of organisations supporting older people in areas around Buckingham¹ Haddenham² and Winslow³ ¹ Addington, Adstock, Akeley, Barton Hartshorn, Beachampton, Biddlesden, Buckingham, Calvert, Charndon, Chetwode, East Claydon, Foscott, Gawcott with Lenborough, Hillesden, Hogshaw, Leckhampstead, Lillingstone Dayrell with Luffield Abbey, Lillingstone Lovell, Maids Moreton, Middle Claydon, Nash, Padbury, Poundon, Preston Bissett, Radclive-cum-Chackmore, Shalstone, Steeple Claydon, Stowe, Thornborough, Thornton, Tingewick, Turweston, Twyford, Water Stratford, Westbury and Whaddon. ² Aston Sandford, Boarstall, Brill, Chearsley, Chilton, Cuddington, Dinton-with-Ford and Upton, Haddenham, Ickford, Kingsey, Long Crendon, Oakley, Shabbington, Stone with Bishopstone and Hartwell, and Worminghall ³ Creslow, Dunton, Granborough , Great Horwood , Hardwick, Hoggeston, Little Horwood , Mursley, Newton Longville , North Marston , Oving , Pitchcott, Swanbourne, Whitchurch and Winslow This pack is produced as part of the Building Community Capacity Project by AVDC’s Lynne Maddocks. Contact on 01296 585364 or [email protected] for more information. July 2013 Index All groups are listed alphabetically according to organisation name. This list is not a fully comprehensive listing of older people’s services in these areas, but is designed to be a good starting point. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this information. It is up to date at the time of printing which is July 2013. Page No Organisation name 4 Abbeyfield (Haddenham) -
Archive Catalogue
Buckinghamshire Archaeological Society CATALOGUE OF THE SOCIETY'S COLLECTION OF ARCHIVES HELD IN THE MUNIMENT ROOM Compiled by Lorna M. Head With additional material by Diana Gulland Buckinghamshire Papers No.1 2002 additions and amendments 2007 HOW TO USE THE CATALOGUE These archives may be consulted, on application to Mrs. Diana Gulland, the Hon. LibrarianIArchivist, on Wednesdays from 10.00am to 4.00pm. When requesting material please quote the call mark, found on the left-hand side of the page, together with the full description of the item. General e nquiries about the archives, or requests for more details of those collections which are listed as having been entered on to the Library's database, are welcomed either by letter or telephone. This Catalogue describes the archives in the Muniment Room at the time of printing in 2002. Details of additions to the stock and of progress in entering all stock on to the Society's computer database will be posted on our proposed website and published in our Newsletters. Buckinghamshire Archaeological Society Library County Museum Church Street Aylesbury Bucks HP20 2QP Telephone No. 01296 678114 (Wednesdays only) CONTENTS Call mark Page Introduction 3 Antiquarian collections Warren R. DAWSON DAW Gerald and Elizabeth ELVEY ELVEY Henry GOUGH and W. P. Storer GOU F. G. GURNEY GUR R. W. HOLT HOL Rev. H. E. RUDDY RUD A. V. WOODMAN WOO Dr Gordon H. WYATT WYA Other collections ELECTION MATERIAL ELECT George LIPSCOMB'S notes for The History and Antiquities of the County of Buckingham L1 P Copies of MANUSCRIPTS MSS MAPS MAPS MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTION MISC POLL BOOKS and ELECTION REGISTERS POLL Topographical PRINTS PRINTS Parish REGISTER transcripts REG SALE CATALOGUES SAL INTRODUCTION, by Lorna Head For many years after its foundation in 1847, the Buckinghamshire Archaeological Society was the only repository for archives in the county and a collection was gradually built up through deposits and gifts.