Enclosure Commissioners and Buckinghamshire Parliamentary Enclosure

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Enclosure Commissioners and Buckinghamshire Parliamentary Enclosure Enclosure Commissioners and Buckinghamshire Parliamentary Enclosure '/ By MICHAEL TURNER : 7 _~ q i I Reseat& has been published on such archi- r:rwF.~.N I738 and I865 there were over tects of the landscape as the surveyor and the I3o enclosure Acts in Buckinghamshire landscape gardeners; why not also on the archi- B affecting the whole or parts of more than tects of the Georgian enclosures?5 After all: I3O parishes out of~e approximately 22o in the "Behind file features of the landscape.., there county at the time. Over I66,ooo acres, or 35 are men, and it is men that history seeks to per cent of the county, was enclosed in a little grasp." They include enclosure commissioners, over I2o years. In comparative terms such a surveyors, clerks and solicitors, bankers, an density places the comity ninth overall in rank- assortment of labourers, and, of course, the ing order of counties, the preceding eight being landowners and their tenants, but as determi- in the south and east midlands, with file excep- nants of landscape change file concentration tion of the East Riding of Yorkshire? More im- must be on the commissioners and their sur- portant, however, is that parliamentary enclo- veyors. As architects of the cultural landscape sure in Buckinghamshire was concentrated in they have left their indelible mark for all to the five northern hundreds, part of the Midland wimess. ~ Plain, affecting 58 per cent of Cottesloe hun- dred, 48 per cent of Aylesbury hundred, 44 per II cent of Newport Pagnell hundred, 4I per cent For the earlier period of enclosure, essentially of Buckingham hundred, and 27 per cent of before the mid-I77o's, an enclosure commis- Ashendon hundred, compared with only 7 per sion might consist of five or more commission- cent and 9 per cent respectively for the Chiltern ers. Thereafter it was usual for only three to be hundreds of Burnham and Desborough. a The appointed, and a more formal procedure was combined density of enclosure for the five north- adopted at the same time. The enclosure Act ern hundreds was 44 per cent, placing them usually stated that each commissioner was the among file top six comities, a group which is specific representative of a particular landown- centred upon Northamptonshire and Bedford- ing interest: one for the lord of the manor, one shire, and includes Rutland, Huntingdon, Ox- for tile tithe owner, and one for the majority fordshire, and North Buckinghamshire.4 (by value) of the remaining landowners. This My thanks are due to Mr E. J. Davis and his staff at last was reckoned not as the numerical majority the County Record Office, Aylesbury, for assistance in the but rather in terms of the extent of land pos- completion of this research, and to Dr B. A. Holderness and Professor F. C. Spooner for helpful criticism of an sessed. Thus, if one landowner possessed 5I per earlier version of this article. cent of the parish lie would automatically be the 2 From G. Slater, The English Peasantry and the En- "majority of landowners." Recourse was usu- closure of Common Fields, I9o7, pp. I4o-z. See the revised ,:] figures in M. E. Turner, 'Parliamentary Enclosure and 5 The full quotation can be found in M. Bloch, The Population Change in England x75o-i83 o', Explorations Historian's Craft, English translation, Manchester, I954, in Econ. Hist., xtn, I976. p. z6. The last hundred in the county, Stoke, is situated in For example, E. G. R. Taylor, 'The Surveyor', Econ. ;! the Thames valley where 30 per cent of the land was en- Hist. Rev. xst set., xvIr, I947, PP. IZI-33, and some closed by Act. This was mainly common and waste, en- of her other works, for which see Trans. Inst. Br. Geog., closures symptomatic of the reclamation of marginal lands XLV, I968, pp. I8t-6; H. C. Prince, Parks in England, during the French Wars of r 793-I 815. Isle of Wight, x967; B. E. Coates, 'The work of Richard , i 4 The highest density of enclosure was in Northamp- Woods, landscape gardener, in the West Riding of tonshire, where over 50 per cent of the county was en- Yorkshire', Trans. Hunter Arch. Soc., vnI, x963, pp. )i closed between I7z7 and I815. z97-3o6. IZO BUCKINGHAMSHIRE ENCLOSURE COMMISSIONERS I2I ally made to the annual land tax assessments in ments compared with their scattered property order to establish this fact. The whole proce- in the former open fields. They may not have dure no doubt prompted the contemporary ob- received a proportionate quantity of land, but servation that the nomination of commissioners as compensation they almost certainly received was: (~ a little" system of patronage.., the lor d a greater quality of land. This point was invari- of the soil, die rector, and a few of the principal ably omitted by the critics of enclosure, though proprietors monopolise and distribute the ap- die commissioners' oath did require diem to pointments.' '7 have due regard to quantity and quality. Some As many as I43 different people were ap- of these commissioners were themselves in re- pointed as enclosure commissioners in Buck- ceipt of quite large properties. For example, inghamshire, including fllose who acted as Thomas Green of Whitchurch who acted on valuers for the Inclosure Commission set up by nine commissions, was in possession of 366 acres the General Act of Inclosure of i 845. Of these at the enclosure of his home parish in I77I-Z; 9 commissioners 83 served only once, 28 on two the widow of-William Cripps (who acted twice) occasions, and the remainder as follows: was allotted lO6 acres at the enclosure of New- port Pagnell in I794-5 ;x0 Thomas Hooton (who I served 29 times I served 9 times acted once) was allotted Io6 acres at the same I served 15 times 2 served 7 times enclosure ;n Joseph Burn_ham, who acted three I served 14 times z served 6 times times as a commissioner, and several times as I served 13 times ~, served 5 times solicitor and/or clerk, was allotted zo5 acres at I served 12 tunes 8 served 4 times the enclosure of Aylesbury in I77I-2, i2 and I served II runes 8 served 3 times James, another active member of the Burnham 3 served IO ~mes family, was allotted 261 acres at Grandborough They came from ma W walks of life. Of the ten in 1796-7 .18 Many other commissioners were members of the clergy to act, eight were active styled yeoman or gentleman, and by residence before I78O. The rest of the body of commis- or title dearly had very dose.associatious with sioners were often a mixed assortment. Edward the soil, and were obviously very well endowed Elliot, who acted once at Shipton in 1744-5, with the necessary credentials to adjudicate on was a schoolmaster, and was joined on this en- and allocate land. closure by three "yeomen" and one "gentle- The practice of separating the quality survey man." Thomas Taylor from Swanbourne, a from the quantity survey continued until the commissioner ten times in the county, lived and early x79o's, by which time a new breed of died as a carpenter, s It was also usual for a com- commissioner had developed, the land valuer- mission to consist of local dignitaries and those cure-surveyor, with skills both in quality and with a direct association with the soil, such as quantity. Earlier, specially appointed quality graziers, husbandmen, and yeoman farmers. men were assisted by one or more of the com- They conducted the allotting of the parish, and missioners. In time the latter undertook more the latter group were also employed as sur- and more of this quality assessment tmtil special veyors, not as quantity surveyors (that is land quality men were no longer required. Two of surveyors), but as quality surveyors, assessing the more notable quality assessors were John the rental value of the land, a job for which they Watts of Sulgrave in Northamptonshire, and had vast practical knowledge. One objection to Thomas Harrison of Stony Stratford in Buck- ! ! eighteenth-century enclosures is that many pro- 1 9 B.R.O. Inrolments vol. I, Whitchurch Enclosure prietors came to have greatly diminished allot- Award. i0 B.R.O. IR 67(0, Newport Pagnell Enclosure Award. J. Billingsley, General View of the Agriculture of n Ibid. Somerset, 1797, p. 59. I~B.R.O. Inroln,ents vol. x, Aylesbury Enclosure i/i s His will consisted of his carpentry tools and his stock Award. of timber: Bucks. R.O. (hereafter B.R.O.), Wills D/A~ 13 B.R.O. Imolments vol. Iv, Grandborough Enclosure ), WE/II5/I8. Award. ] ~lll!l !'1 ~j I2Z THE AGRICULTURAL HISTORY REVIEW inghamshire. They were also very active com- man, attending at Cublington in 1769-7o, missioners, the former six times in Bucking- Har dwick in 1778--9, and Aston Abbots in 1795, hamshire, seven times in Berkshire, and many all parishes contiguous to his home parish of times in Oxfordshire, the latter IO times in Whitchurch. His other appointments were all Buckinghamshire in the very short space of in parishes within eight miles of Whitchurch. eight years from 1767 to 177574 A number of During his lifetime there were only six enclo- other commissioners in the early period were sures within1that eight miles which escaped his also very busy men. Francis Burton of Aynho attention. No doubt he was well acquainted in Northamptonshire, styled as "Gentleman," with many of the local large landowners, so acted 15 times in Buckin~lamshire from 1762 possibly his popularity was born out of patron- 1777, 28 times in Oxfordshire, once in Wilt- age by his friends.
Recommended publications
  • The Hidation of Buckinghamshire. Keith Bailey
    THE HIDA TION OF BUCKINGHAMSHIRE KEITH BAILEY In a pioneering paper Mr Bailey here subjects the Domesday data on the hidation of Buckinghamshire to a searching statistical analysis, using techniques never before applied to this county. His aim is not explain the hide, but to lay a foundation on which an explanation may be built; to isolate what is truly exceptional and therefore calls for further study. Although he disclaims any intention of going beyond analysis, his paper will surely advance our understanding of a very important feature of early English society. Part 1: Domesday Book 'What was the hide?' F. W. Maitland, in posing purposes for which it may be asked shows just 'this dreary old question' in his seminal study of how difficult it is to reach a consensus. It is Domesday Book,1 was right in saying that it almost, one might say, a Holy Grail, and sub• is in fact central to many of the great questions ject to many interpretations designed to fit this of early English history. He was echoed by or that theory about Anglo-Saxon society, its Baring a few years later, who wrote, 'the hide is origins and structures. grown somewhat tiresome, but we cannot well neglect it, for on no other Saxon institution In view of the large number of scholars who have we so many details, if we can but decipher have contributed to the subject, further discus• 2 them'. Many subsequent scholars have also sion might appear redundant. So it would be directed their attention to this subject: A.
    [Show full text]
  • BUCKING Hal\T!SHIRE. FAR 259
    TRADES DIRECTORY.] BUCKING HAl\t!SHIRE. FAR 259 Tack Thomas, The Firs, Steeple Clay- TownsendJohnEmberton,Newprt. Pagnll Webb Joseph, Mount Pleasant, ~fiddle don, Winslow Townsend J. W. Gayhurst, :Newprt. Pgnll Craydon, Steeple Claydon S.O Talbot William, The Hyde, Olney S.O Treadwell J. Winchendon Up. Aylesbury Webster Samuel, North Crawley, New- Tanner Henry, Twyford, Buckingham Treadwell Samuel, Windmill hill, Wad- port Pagnell Tapping Henry, Wendover dean, Wen- desdon, Aylesbury WeedonThomasBrown,NewHousefarm, dover, Tring Treadwell Tom, Stowe, Buckingham Chalfont St. Giles,Gerrard's Cross R.S.O TappingJ. H. Weston Turville, Aylesbury Treadwell J. jun. Tingewick, Buckingham Welch George, Gold hill, Chalfont St. Tapping John Henry, Manor farm, Stoke Tucker John, Little Totteridge, Hazle- Peter, Gerrard's Cross R.S.O Mandeville, Aylesbury mere, High Wycombe Welch T. Layter's green, Chalfont St. Tarrant J. Eton wick, Eton, Winsdor Turner W. Great Brickhill, Bletchley Peter, Gerrard's Cross R.S.O Tattam John, Deverells, Swanbrne. W nslw Turney C. T. Chicheley, K ewport Pagnell Wells J ames, Ley hill, Chesham R.S.O Tayler G. Kickles frm. Newport Pagnell Turney J. Slapton, Leighton Buzzard West Arthur, Twigside, Ibstone, Tetswrth Taylor David, Haddenham, Thame TurneyJameFJ,Soulbury,LeightonBuzzrd West GBo. Stokenchurch, Wallingford Taylor G. Little Missenden, Amersham Turnham Henry, London road, Wycombe West Geor"e, Hundridae, Chesham R.S.O Taylor Henry, Newton Blossom ville, Twidell W. Dagnall, Great Berkhamstead West Robe~t, Daws hill~Radnage, Stoken- Newport Pagnell Tyler Thomas, Loosely row, Princes church, Wallingford Taylor J. Milton Keynes, Nwprt. Pagnell Risborough S.O West W. Lewkner-up-Hill,High Wycombe Taylor James, Lane farm, Kingswood, Uff Richard, Westcott, Aylesbury Westaway Mark A.
    [Show full text]
  • Buckinghamshire. [Kelly's
    120 HOGGESTON. BUCKINGHAMSHIRE. [KELLY'S Charles Il. and rector of this parish, who died 2oth The land is principally pasture, but wheat, oats and Nov. r68o. and his son and successor, Charles Gataker, beans are grown in small quantities. The area is 1,571 equally celebrated as a critic and divine, who died acres; mteable value, £1,472; the population in 19rr Nov. wtb, 17or, are both buried in the chancel. In was 138. the village i!l a Reading-room, open during the winter Sexton, Henry Baker. evenings. The Earl of Rosebery K.G., K.T., P.C.. Lett~n through Winslow arrive at 7.ro a.m. & 6.30 F.S.A. is lord of the manor and owns all the land with p.m. week days; sundayR, 8.30 a.m. Wall Letter Box the exception of the glebe. The old Manor House, an ( cleared week days at 7.15 a.m. & 6-4o p.m.; sundays interesting building in the Domestic Gothic style and I at 8.40 a.m. Winslow is the nearest money order t dating from about the r6th century, has a good panelled 1 telegraph office, about 3! miles dist-ant room, massive oak stairs and fine chimneys, and is no" Eh"lmentary School (mixed), for so children; Miu occupied by Mr. Blick Morris, in whose family it has re Wilkin&, mi~tress; Miss Alice Margaret Baylis, cor- mained for 200 year!!. The soil is clay; subsoil, clay res.pondent Walpole Rev. Arthur Sumner :M.A.. 1 COMMERCIAL .!\lorris Blick, farmer, Manor honss (rector), The Rectory · Chapman Wm.
    [Show full text]
  • Buckingham Share As at 16 July 2021
    Deanery Share Statement : 2021 allocation 3AM AMERSHAM 2021 Cash Recd Bal as at % Paid Share To Date 16-Jul-21 To Date A/C No Parish £ £ £ % S4642 AMERSHAM ON THE HILL 75,869 44,973 30,896 59.3 DD S4645 AMERSHAM w COLESHILL 93,366 55,344 38,022 59.3 DD S4735 BEACONSFIELD ST MARY, MICHAEL & THOMAS 244,244 144,755 99,489 59.3 DD S4936 CHALFONT ST GILES 82,674 48,998 33,676 59.3 DD S4939 CHALFONT ST PETER 88,520 52,472 36,048 59.3 DD S4971 CHENIES & LITTLE CHALFONT 73,471 43,544 29,927 59.3 DD S4974 CHESHAM BOIS 87,147 51,654 35,493 59.3 DD S5134 DENHAM 70,048 41,515 28,533 59.3 DD S5288 FLAUNDEN 20,011 11,809 8,202 59.0 DD S5324 GERRARDS CROSS & FULMER 224,363 132,995 91,368 59.3 DD S5351 GREAT CHESHAM 239,795 142,118 97,677 59.3 DD S5629 LATIMER 17,972 7,218 10,754 40.2 DD S5970 PENN 46,370 27,487 18,883 59.3 DD S5971 PENN STREET w HOLMER GREEN 70,729 41,919 28,810 59.3 DD S6086 SEER GREEN 75,518 42,680 32,838 56.5 DD S6391 TYLERS GREEN 41,428 24,561 16,867 59.3 DD S6694 AMERSHAM DEANERY 5,976 5,976 0 0.0 Deanery Totals 1,557,501 920,018 637,483 59.1 R:\Store\Finance\FINANCE\2021\Share 2021\Share 2021Bucks Share20/07/202112:20 Deanery Share Statement : 2021 allocation 3AY AYLESBURY 2021 Cash Recd Bal as at % Paid Share To Date 16-Jul-21 To Date A/C No Parish £ £ £ % S4675 ASHENDON 5,108 2,975 2,133 58.2 DD S4693 ASTON SANDFORD 6,305 6,305 0 100.0 S4698 AYLESBURY ST MARY 49,527 23,000 26,527 46.4 S4699 AYLESBURY QUARRENDON ST PETER 7,711 4,492 3,219 58.3 DD S4700 AYLESBURY BIERTON 23,305 13,575 9,730 58.2 DD S4701 AYLESBURY HULCOTT ALL SAINTS
    [Show full text]
  • Aylesbury Vale North Locality Profile
    Aylesbury Vale North Locality Profile Prevention Matters Priorities The Community Links Officer (CLO) has identified a number of key Prevention Matters priorities for the locality that will form the focus of the work over the next few months. These priorities also help to determine the sort of services and projects where Prevention Matters grants can be targeted. The priorities have been identified using the data provided by the Community Practice Workers (CPW) in terms of successful referrals and unmet demand (gaps where there are no appropriate services available), consultation with district council officers, town and parish councils, other statutory and voluntary sector organisations and also through the in depth knowledge of the cohort and the locality that the CLO has gained. The CLO has also worked with the other CLOs across the county to identify some key countywide priorities which affect all localities. Countywide Priorities Befriending Community Transport Aylesbury Vale North Priorities Affordable Day Activities Gentle Exercise Low Cost Gardening Services Dementia Services Social Gardening Men in Sheds Outreach for Carers Background data Physical Area The Aylesbury Vale North locality (AV North) is just less than 200 square miles in terms of land area (500 square kilometres). It is a very rural locality in the north of Buckinghamshire. There are officially 63 civil parishes covering the area (approximately a third of the parishes in Bucks). There are 2 small market towns, Buckingham and Winslow, and approximately 70 villages or hamlets (as some of the parishes cover more than one village). Population The total population of the Aylesbury Vale North locality (AV North) is 49,974 based on the populations of the 63 civil parishes from the 2011 Census statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Aylesbury Vale Councillor Update Economic Profile of Brill Ward
    Aylesbury Vale Councillor Update Economic Profile of Brill Ward April 2014 Produced by Buckinghamshire Business First’s research department P a g e | 2 1.0 Introduction Brill is home to 2,578 people and provides 800 jobs in 143 businesses. Of these businesses, 29 (20.3 per cent) are Buckinghamshire Business First members. There were 1,341 employed people aged 16-74 living in Brill ward at the 2011 Census, 14 fewer than the 1,355 recorded in 2001. Over that period the working age population fell 130 to 1,592 while the total population fell 147 to 2,578. The number of households rose by 7 (0.7 per cent) to 1,068. This was the 27th fastest increase in Aylesbury Vale and the 94th fastest . The largest companies in Brill include: Chilton House; Chilton Home Farms Ltd; Fennell Blake & Co Ltd; G S Mechanicals Ltd; L G Kimber Engineering Ltd; Merson I-Level Retail; and Magnolia Park Golf & Country Club There are nine Brill, representing 0.5 per cent of working age residents, including five claimants aged 18-24 and five who have been claiming for more than twelve months. Commercial fibre coverage (as provided by BT and Virgin Media) is set to cover 1 per cent of Brill by 2015. The Connected Countiesi project run by BBF will deliver a further 80 per cent through intervention in the Bicester, Brill, Ickford, Long Crendon and Stanton St John exchange areas. The project will deliver extended superfast footprint via additional funding, adaptation of downstream technology and contract claw-back mechanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Report on the Archaeological Investigations at Northampton Road, Brackley, Northamptonshire
    Albion Archaeology Preliminary report on the archaeological investigations at Northampton Road, Brackley, Northamptonshire Photo1: Aerial view of the Northampton Road development area from south Introduction Between June and October 2014 Albion Archaeology undertook open-area excavation in advance of mixed-use development by Albion Land plc on land off Northampton Road, Brackley. An area of c. 3ha was excavated divided into two main parts of unequal size, exposing an unenclosed middle Iron Age settlement. The main part of the settlement extended over c. 1.6ha and was in the northern excavation area, possibly continuing beyond the limit of the development area (see figure at the back of this report). It was characterised by roundhouses, ditched enclosures, post-built structures and an abundance of storage pits. Similar features were found to the south and in the southern excavation area, although these were smaller in number and occurred in a much lower density than in the main settlement area. Roundhouses Evidence for c. 20 roundhouses was identified. They were defined by pennanular gullies with E-facing entrances. The area defined by the gullies ranged from 8–15m in diameter, whilst the gullies themselves were generally shallow and only a few had been redug. The majority of the gullies are assumed to have served a drainage function with no structural slots associated with the outer walls being identified. Preliminary report on the archaeological investigations at Northampton Road, Brackley, Northants 1 (Mike Luke, Jo Barker and Iain Leslie. Albion report 2016-66) Albion Archaeology Many contained postholes which may have provided roof support or internal divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • INFRASTRUCTURE SCHEDULE Transport
    Schedule of Significant Proposed Changes Section 18.0 / Appendix 4 – West Northamptonshire Infrastructure Delivery Plan – Schedule Extract INFRASTRUCTURE SCHEDULE Transport Ref Growth Infrastructure Requirement Required for Delivery Broad Cost Funding Location Growth at Body Phasing Est. Sources Northampton T1 NRDA A45/M1 Northampton Growth NRDA NCC/HA 2014 £12.24m Developer Management Scheme* (see table below) start T2 Northampton North West Bypass Phase 1 (A428 to Northampton Developer 2014 £11.3m Developer (West) Grange Farm) Kings Heath start T3 Northampton North West Bypass Phase 2 (Grange Northampton NCC/ 2021 £16.3m Developer (West) Farm to A5199) (West) Developer start T4 Northampton Sandy Lane Relief Road Phase 2 Norwood Farm Developer 2016 £5.42m Developer (West) related to Upton Lodge Norwood Farm /Upton Lodge developments T5 NRDA New Bus Interchange at Northampton Wider Area NBC 2013 £10m WNDC/ Town Centre start NBC T6 NRDA New Railway Transport Interchange at Wider Area Network 2014 £30m WNDC/ Northampton Castle Station Rail start NCC T7 Northampton Kingsthorpe Corridor Improvements Northampton NCC 2010 £3.8m NCC/ (West) (West) start Developer T8 NRDA Highway and Junction Improvements to Northampton NCC 2013 £1.2m NCC/NBC/ provide access to developments in the Town Centre - Developer St John’s area. St John’s Area T9 NRDA Plough Junction Improvements Northampton St NCC 2015 £3m Grant John’s Area Funded T10 NRDA Ransome Road Nunn Mills Link Road Avon Nunn Mills NCC/ 2014 £17.6m WNDC/ Developer start Developer T11 NRDA London Road Ransome Road Junction Avon Nunn Mills NCC 2011 £2.3m WNDC/ Schedule of Significant Proposed Changes Section 18.0 / Appendix 4 – West Northamptonshire Infrastructure Delivery Plan – Schedule Extract Ref Growth Infrastructure Requirement Required for Delivery Broad Cost Funding Location Growth at Body Phasing Est.
    [Show full text]
  • Aylesbury Vale Councillor Update Economic Profile of Tingewick Ward
    Aylesbury Vale Councillor Update Economic Profile of Tingewick Ward April 2014 Produced by Buckinghamshire Business First’s research department P a g e | 2 1.0 Introduction Tingewick is home to 3,275 people and provides 2,000 jobs in 241 businesses. Of these businesses, 10 (4.1 per cent) are Buckinghamshire Business First members. There were 1,690 employed people aged 16-74 living in Tingewick ward at the 2011 Census, 175 more than the 1,515 recorded in 2001. Over that period the working age population rose 67 to 2,035 while the total population rose 205 to 3,275. The number of households fell by 118 (9.7 per cent) to 1,332. This is a fairly significant percentage increase and places the ward 9th out of all wards in Aylesbury Vale. Based on the increase in number of households, the ward ranks 20th out of all wards in Buckinghamshire. The largest companies in Tingewick include: Buckingham Group Contracting Ltd; Cartwright Landscapes; Chackmore C of E School; Finmere Fuels; Green Retreats LLP; Karavelle Ltd; and Quality Interior Components. There are 13 Tingewick, representing 0.6 per cent of working age residents, including five claimants aged 18-24 and ten who have been claiming for less than six months. Superfast broadband is expected to be available to 88 per cent of premises in the Tingewick ward by March 2016 with commercial providers responsible for 51 per cent. The Connected Counties project, run by BBF, deliver the remaining 37 per cent through its interventions in Buckingham, Crackley, Finmere and Syresham exchange areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Drayton Parslow, Newton Longville and Stoke Hammond - Batch 7 HELAA Sites (February 2016) W
    W ARN IV ER Y S RO L AD A N E BRO OKF IELD W ROAD ST D OK A E R 1:16,000 O OA R D Y E W L E H S C NLV028 TB T NLV027 R E O L O B K EN HELAA Batch 7 Report sites D D A O R N O T Y A R D SHM017 SHM018 SHM016 N E W T O N R O A D N E W T O N R O A D DPA002 DPA003 P R O S P E C Y T A C L W O H S E G I H D A O R IN A M E S O DPA001 L C H T R O N © Crown Copyright and database right 2016. Ordnance Survey 100019797 0 100 200 400 600 800 1,000 metres Drayton Parslow, Newton Longville and Stoke Hammond - Batch 7 HELAA sites (February 2016) W S 1:5,000 A N D H I L L R O A D E S O L C M R A F Y CH E URCH N WAY R E V EMERALD CLOSE ECL001 D A O R S Y R A M T S ECL002 HELAA Batch 7 Report sites © Crown Copyright and database right 2016. Ordnance Survey 100019797 0 50 100 200 300 metres East Claydon - Batch 7 HELAA sites (February 2016) D A KN O IGHT R S CL L OSE L A H T R O N D YEW TREE CLOSE A O B W R O Y W A ER R L 1:8,700 B AN N E O D T A A E O R E L B A T S N U D D N E R O O M H A R L IN G R O A S D UM M ER LE YS E ID T S E R E E T G R O A O T W EDL017 D S C IN O H W O T R E G N I L C T H H AN A R E D E N D BR O E O N J K A A S L CK TR D S E N K O E E L N T A S H C T W LO U N S O E E S W R O W D A E E M AN 'S L K LL O MI O C S OW LL BE OW S R ER SK EDL020 TA E B E L G TH S E ' G Y R R E A EN M T S EDL021 L E S T IG E H D R E H T A U W S T L O E IL IC N S L K M A E O E R P U W T S N T O E E S S A G H V L D N T A A I N K W E LO N W O BR P E B C B H L IL E T M E T R O O N O W A R VE N N S U ID E E HELAA Batch 7 Report sites © Crown Copyright and database right 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Archive Catalogue
    Buckinghamshire Archaeological Society CATALOGUE OF THE SOCIETY'S COLLECTION OF ARCHIVES HELD IN THE MUNIMENT ROOM Compiled by Lorna M. Head With additional material by Diana Gulland Buckinghamshire Papers No.1 2002 additions and amendments 2007 HOW TO USE THE CATALOGUE These archives may be consulted, on application to Mrs. Diana Gulland, the Hon. LibrarianIArchivist, on Wednesdays from 10.00am to 4.00pm. When requesting material please quote the call mark, found on the left-hand side of the page, together with the full description of the item. General e nquiries about the archives, or requests for more details of those collections which are listed as having been entered on to the Library's database, are welcomed either by letter or telephone. This Catalogue describes the archives in the Muniment Room at the time of printing in 2002. Details of additions to the stock and of progress in entering all stock on to the Society's computer database will be posted on our proposed website and published in our Newsletters. Buckinghamshire Archaeological Society Library County Museum Church Street Aylesbury Bucks HP20 2QP Telephone No. 01296 678114 (Wednesdays only) CONTENTS Call mark Page Introduction 3 Antiquarian collections Warren R. DAWSON DAW Gerald and Elizabeth ELVEY ELVEY Henry GOUGH and W. P. Storer GOU F. G. GURNEY GUR R. W. HOLT HOL Rev. H. E. RUDDY RUD A. V. WOODMAN WOO Dr Gordon H. WYATT WYA Other collections ELECTION MATERIAL ELECT George LIPSCOMB'S notes for The History and Antiquities of the County of Buckingham L1 P Copies of MANUSCRIPTS MSS MAPS MAPS MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTION MISC POLL BOOKS and ELECTION REGISTERS POLL Topographical PRINTS PRINTS Parish REGISTER transcripts REG SALE CATALOGUES SAL INTRODUCTION, by Lorna Head For many years after its foundation in 1847, the Buckinghamshire Archaeological Society was the only repository for archives in the county and a collection was gradually built up through deposits and gifts.
    [Show full text]
  • AVDC Sub Groups Local Lettings Policy
    AVDC local lettings policy Scheme details Development/Estate name Any general need housing to which AVDC has nomination rights (excluding Rural Exception Schemes). RSL Any Local Lettings Policy – 15 May 2014 Commencement Date End Date To be reviewed in May 2015 Total number of properties in N/a estate/development Number of properties subject to proposed 50% of new build properties Local Lettings Policy 25% of re let properties Property type and number of beds and Nos. of Supported Rented Intermediate persons units Housing General need, re-let properties 25% of N/a Y N total General need, new build properties 50% of N/a Y N total Justification for local lettings policy Choice based lettings means that qualifying applicants are able to choose to express interest in any properties which become available and are the appropriate size and match their needs. Applicants who express interest in properties are then prioritised by their level of housing need (Bands A- D) and then how long they have been on the Housing Register. No consideration has previously been given to where in the District the applicant is from or where the property is located. Following previous direction from Members at Environment and Living Scrutiny Committee officers developed a scheme which was subsequently approved at cabinet and council. This scheme divides Aylesbury Vale into four ‘sub groups’ and allows some extra preference to be given to applicants with a connection to their local community. For the purposes of this local lettings policy, Aylesbury Vale is split into four groups, (Greater Aylesbury, North, South West and South East) which are broadly consistent with current LAF (local area forum) areas.
    [Show full text]