Historic Landscape Charaterisation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Historic Landscape Charaterisation Appendix 6 Analysis – Enclosure Regular Enclosures in Hoggeston parish, Vale of Aylesbury Buckinghamshire Historic Landscape Characterisation Appendix 6 Introduction Enclosed land comprises the most extensive HLC type representing over 72% of the land total. Its main use is for agriculture, a large proportion being for the pasturing of sheep and cattle. The type has a significant impact on aspects of the social and cultural life of the county, where both its form and maintenance are defining characteristics of the aesthetic appeal of the landscape, and is by turn a major influence upon matters such as tourism and planning. Pre 18th Century Enclosure accounts for 32.13% of enclosed land in Buckinghamshire, Parliamentary Enclosure for 28% and Modern Enclosure for 15%. Both the Pre 18th Century (Irregular Enclosure) and Post-Medieval Enclosure types have changed little in the last 150 years, especially when compared with the Modern Enclosure type. Most 20th Century Enclosure is an alteration of a previously enclosed landscape (greatly changed) with just 19% of hectares newly enclosed since the nineteenth century. The HLC mapping (see diagram below) suggests that most of the enclosed landscape has remained largely unchanged for at least 150 years, if not for considerably longer. However, the HLC process did not evaluate the continuing presence of smaller landscape features, such as barns and trees, or the composition of boundary type, boundary size, hedgerows and routeways. Nor did it assess the intrusive features of modern life, such as pylons, new roads, street lighting or other elements leading to the sub-urbanisation of the countryside. These may have a significant impact upon the appearance and condition of the landscape and all play an important part in shaping the landscape visible from the ground. It is likely that there will be areas which will have a different ‘feel’ today to that of a couple of centuries ago, although the basic pattern of enclosure has remained the same. Enclosed from Enclosed from Woodland Settlement 1.15% 0.18% Enclosed from Commons Heaths Enclosed from 2.35% Parkland 0.33% Ancient Enclosure 32.13% Enclosed from Mixed Origin Open Fields 1.10% 37.62% Enclosed from Downland Enclosed from Enclosed from 0.25% Older Enclosures Industry 24.91% 0.004% Fig. 1: The Origins of Buckinghamshire/Milton Keynes enclosures; percentages represent area of land cover. 2 Buckinghamshire Historic Landscape Characterisation Appendix 6 Fig. 2: The distribution and phasing of Parliamentary Enclosure Acts in Buckinghamshire 3 Buckinghamshire Historic Landscape Characterisation Appendix 6 Boundary Loss Figure 3 below shows the distribution of boundary loss and boundary gain in Buckinghamshire. The areas of most loss are in distinct areas, north east area of Milton Keynes, the landscapes surrounding Stowe and Whittlewood forest; while the Chilterns district contains the most amount of loss in the south. Boundary gain is almost evenly distributed although there are greater concentrations in South Buckinghamshire district in proximity to urban centres. Much of this boundary loss has coincided with prime agricultural land grades 1 &2. Boundary Loss No Loss Minimal Major Gain Boundary Gain Major Los s 12% 12% Minimal Los s 30% Unchanged 46% 4 Buckinghamshire Historic Landscape Characterisation Appendix 6 Enclosed land The occurrence of on high valued agricultural land in Buckinghamshire coincides with an increase in prairie fields and parliamentary enclosures. Woodland( All Varieties) 1.73% Allotments Open land 0.39% 0.31% Assarts Industrial (All varieties) Recreation Areas 0.91% Meadows 2.28% 2.42% 2.21% Airfields Park and Gardens 0.28% Coaxial Fields Fossilised Strips Hospitals Schools 6.19% 1.17% 0.26% 0.12% Settlement All varieties Sinouous Fields 5.15% Irregular Fields (Pre 18th 0.50% century) Reservoirs and Restored 19.06% Lakes 0.27% Crofts (Medieval Post Medieval) 0.05% 20th Century Enclosures 7.71% 19th century fields 6.62% Parliamentary Enclosure Prairie Fields 22.72% Regular Fields (Pre 18th 15.95% century) 3.73% 5 Appendix 7 Analysis – Woodland Hollowhill Wood, Medmenham, Wycombe District Buckinghamshire Historic Landscape Characterisation Appendix 7 Introduction Woodland represents nearly 9% of the land cover in Buckinghamshire, covering some c.175 km² of landscape. However, this figure does not include woodlands under 2 hectares and also omits those found within the boundaries of Historic Parks and Gardens. This would add to the total coverage but even without these classifications, Buckinghamshire is still one of the more woodland landscapes in England. The distribution of woodland (as will be seen below), is not consistent and the extent is largely due to the Buckinghamshire Chilterns, which are renowned for their beech woodlands. The woodland cover comprises six HLC types: Ancient Semi Natural, Ancient Replanted; Wood Pasture; Secondary Woodland; Coniferous Plantations and Orchards. (The details and definitions of all these types can be accessed in Appendix 1). Fig. 1: The distribution of Woodland in Buckinghamshire /Milton Keynes 2 Buckinghamshire Historic Landscape Characterisation Appendix 7 Aylesbury Vale As the largest district in Buckinghamshire, the Vale of Aylesbury has a distinctly un- wooded feel to it. The landscape is synonymous with planned, open enclosures with scrubby hedgerows, the result of successive phases of post-medieval enclosure. However, there are areas where woodland forms the a distinct characteristic of the landscape, this is largely due to the survival of the former ancient hunting forests of Bernwood, Whittlewood and the hunting chase at Whaddon. The extent of much of these woodlands has remained unchanged since the 19th century, although some replanting has taken place, removing the natural broadleaf species for pantations. The other main characteristic of woodland in the Vale of Aylesbury is that 46% of the wood in is made up of secondary woodland and coniferous plantations. This large proportion can be attributed to natural regeneration of farmland but also the proliferations of coverts for the purposes of hunting, the Aylesbury Vale was once home to the Bicester and Whaddon Chase hunt and an abundance of small woodlands punctuate the landscape. It is also a revealing statistic that the average woodland size is 3.28 hectares, although the most amount of woodland area is found in woodlands that are 50< 100 hectares, reflecting the contribution of the former hunting forests, (see Figure 10). Woodland (Ancient Semi Natural) 9% 2% Woodland (Ancient Replanted) 45% Woodland (Secondary Woodland) 37% Woodland (Coniferous Plantation) 7% Orchards Fig. 2 & 3 Pie chart depicting the proportion of woodland types by area and the character of woodland landscape in the Winslow area of Aylesbury Vale depicting small rectangular plantations and coverts. 3 Buckinghamshire Historic Landscape Characterisation Appendix 7 Chilterns Woodland covers c.15% of the Chiltern woodland almost two-thirds of which is ancient semi natural woodland. It is noticeable that ancient woodlands in the north part of the district has a distinctive morphology, being long and sinuous in form, (see Fig. 5), generally these are located in areas of high relief along the sides of the ridges that run along the Chess valley. These also coincide with parish boundaries and conform to the ladder-like layout of ancient coaxial enclosures. The character of ancient woodland changes towards the southern end of the district; here, larger blocks of woodland are found, including the important relict wood pasture of Penn Wood. Much of ancient woodland found along the edge of parish boundaries. The district includes the present of Penn Wood, a rare relict of wood pasture. Secondary woodland represents 38% of wood cover, this largely relates to re-growth surrounding existing woodlands and the colonisation of downland, (example). It is also noticeable that this area of Buckinghamshire has the highest proportion of Orchards. Woodland (Ancient Semi Natural) 4% 12% Woodland (Ancient Replanted) 48% Woodland (Wood Pasture) 24% Woodland (Secondary Woodland) 9% 3% Woodland (Coniferous Plantation) Orchards Fig. 4 & 5: Pie chart depicting the proportion of woodland types and the character of woodland in the Chilterns District 4 Buckinghamshire Historic Landscape Characterisation Appendix 7 Milton Keynes Milton Keynes is the least wooded part of Buckinghamshire with less than 4% of landscape coverage. Despite this low figure, there are notable concentrations of ancient semi-natural woodland, the most prominent is found in an area to the north west of Milton Keynes covering the parishes of Gayhurst, Ravenstone, Stoke Golding and Weston Underwood; this coincides with part of the former ancient hunting forest of Salcey. There are also some remnants of ancient woodland fossilised within the city of Milton Keynes, where the city’s architects and planners have purposefully incorporated this into its design, the woods of Linford wood in Stantonbury and Howe Park Wood, Shenley Brook End are good examples. In terms of modern woodland, coniferous plantations are found across the region, although the greatest concentration is found on the Greensand ridge of the Brickhills, where 20th century planting has covered much of the former heathland. Woodland (Ancient Semi Natural) 1% 21% Woodland (Ancient Replanted) Woodland (Secondary Woodland) 52% Woodland (Coniferous Plantation) 20% 6% Orchards Fig. 6 & 7: Pie chart depicting the proportion of woodland types and
Recommended publications
  • North Bucks Rripple (Ramblers Repairing & Improving Public Paths
    North Bucks rRIPPLE (ramblers Repairing & Improving Public Paths for Leisure & Exercise) Activity Report 22 September 2016 – 13 November 2016 Before & after photos of all work are available on request. Man hours include some travel time. DaG = Donate a Gate. CAMS is a reference used by BCC/Ringway Jacobs for work requests. All work is requested and authorised by Alastair McVail, Ringway Jacobs, North Bucks RoW Officer, or Jon Clark, BCC Access Officer. 22/9/16 Took delivery of 7 Marlow and 3 Woodstock kissing gates from BCC/TfB at CRFC. Good chat with Greg & Bill of TfB regarding gate installation and their preferred installation method using a timber post attached to either side of a gate. Not so critical with kissing gates. 22/9/16 Stewkley. Emailed Alastair McVail re the replacement by TfB of our gate with a kissing gate at SP842264 to appease Mrs Carter. (See 9/8/16 CAMS 81198). 23/9/16 Eythrop. Emailed Jon Clark reCAMS 81845 at SP768134 completed on 3/2/16 as way marker has been knocked down again. 26/9/16 Eythrop. Received CAMS 83629 at SP768134 to rerect snapped of at ground level way marker post - hit by a vehicle. 27/9/16 Mentmore. CAMS 82567 at SP907186 on MEN/8/1 installed way mark post and bridleway way marker discs. Liaised with golf club groundsman, Adam. Two x 2.5 = 5.0 man hours. B&J. 27/9/16 Mentmore. CAMS 82569 at SP889192 and at SP892194 on MEM/15/2. Checked functioning of two timber kissing gates. First one needed timber attaching to post to prevent gate from swinging right through, second considered to be okay.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rectitudines Singularum Personarum
    THE RECTITUDINES SINGULARUM PERSONARUM: ANGLO-SAXON LANDSCAPES IN TRANSITION A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of the University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts S. Jay Lemanski August, 2005 THE RECTITUDINES SINGULARUM PERSONARUM: ANGLO-SAXON LANDSCAPES IN TRANSITION S. Jay Lemanski Thesis Approved: Accepted: _______________________________ _____________________________ Advisor Dean of the College Constance Bouchard Charles Monroe _______________________________ _____________________________ Co-Advisor Dean of the Graduate School Michael Graham George Newkome _______________________________ _____________________________ Department Chair Date Constance Bouchard ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Initial thanks must be given to Gill Cannell, librarian at the Parker Library in Cambridge, who not only provided me with a photostatic copy of the Rectitudines singularum personarum, but also a full physical description of the manuscript in which it is found. I would also like to express my gratitude to Dr. Paul Harvey, professor emeritus at the University of Durham. When I was first considering this project, he was kind enough to look over my proposal, and offered both guidance and encouragement. Finally, I must express my debt to my advisor, Dr. Constance Bouchard, who for many months patiently listened to my thoughts regarding this text, and gave invaluable suggestions and guidance for my research and the writing of my thesis. The depth of her insights coupled with a genuinely caring encouragement are
    [Show full text]
  • BUCKIKC1 HAMSHIRE. L KELLY'>:L Tfreeman William Bussel Stewart Esq
    BUCKIKC1 HAMSHIRE. l KELLY'>:l tFreeman William Bussel Stewart esq. Manor bou!!e, Win­ Laws-on The Hon. Harry Lawson Webster, Orkney grave, Aylesbury cottage, Taplow, Maidenhead; & 37 Grosvenor square, Fremantle The Hon. Cecil, Swanbourne house, Winslow London W Fremantle Admiral Hon. Sir Edmund Bobert G.C,B., Lear Herbert Nelson esq. Brill home, Brill, Thame C.M.G., F.R.G.S. 44 Lower Sloane street, London SW Lee Col. Edward Dyke, Hartwell house, Aylesbury Fremantle The Hon. Thomas Francis V.D. The Old Lehmann Rudolph Cham hers esq. M.P. Fieldhead, house, Swanbourne, Winslow; & IS Chelsea embank- Bourne End S.O.; & 59 Ashley gardens, London SW mentS W • Leon Herbert Samuel esq. Bletchlcy park, Blctchlcy; & Frith-Lowndes William Frederick Lowndes esq. The 17 Delahay street, Westminster, London SW Bury, Chesham Lepper Henry Gurney esq. 18 Walton street, Aylesbury Frye Frederick. Charlwood esq. The Plat, Bourn1 Levi William John esq. ·woughton house, Woughton-on­ End S.O.; & 25 Arnndel gdns. Notting hill, London W the-Green, Bletchley Garrett-Pegge John William esq. Chesham house, tLiberty Arthur Lasenby esq. The Manor house, The Chesham Bois, Chesham Lee, Great Missenden S.O Gibson-Craig Henry Vivian esq Little Lieut.-Gen. Henry Alexander C.B. Fair Leigh, Gilbey Alfred esq. V.D. Wooburn house, Wooburn S.O ·windsor road, Slough Gilbey Wm. Crosbie esq. The Lea, Denh.am,nr.Uxbridge Locke Robert William esq. Bedford house, Aylesbury Giles Hon. Surg.-Col. Peter Droome F.B.C.S.Edin. Lovett Percival Cosby Ernest esq. The Cottage, Soul­ Holne Chase, Blelichley bury, Leighton Buzzard Godwin Lt.-Col.
    [Show full text]
  • Buckinghamshire. [Kelly's
    120 HOGGESTON. BUCKINGHAMSHIRE. [KELLY'S Charles Il. and rector of this parish, who died 2oth The land is principally pasture, but wheat, oats and Nov. r68o. and his son and successor, Charles Gataker, beans are grown in small quantities. The area is 1,571 equally celebrated as a critic and divine, who died acres; mteable value, £1,472; the population in 19rr Nov. wtb, 17or, are both buried in the chancel. In was 138. the village i!l a Reading-room, open during the winter Sexton, Henry Baker. evenings. The Earl of Rosebery K.G., K.T., P.C.. Lett~n through Winslow arrive at 7.ro a.m. & 6.30 F.S.A. is lord of the manor and owns all the land with p.m. week days; sundayR, 8.30 a.m. Wall Letter Box the exception of the glebe. The old Manor House, an ( cleared week days at 7.15 a.m. & 6-4o p.m.; sundays interesting building in the Domestic Gothic style and I at 8.40 a.m. Winslow is the nearest money order t dating from about the r6th century, has a good panelled 1 telegraph office, about 3! miles dist-ant room, massive oak stairs and fine chimneys, and is no" Eh"lmentary School (mixed), for so children; Miu occupied by Mr. Blick Morris, in whose family it has re Wilkin&, mi~tress; Miss Alice Margaret Baylis, cor- mained for 200 year!!. The soil is clay; subsoil, clay res.pondent Walpole Rev. Arthur Sumner :M.A.. 1 COMMERCIAL .!\lorris Blick, farmer, Manor honss (rector), The Rectory · Chapman Wm.
    [Show full text]
  • Northamptonshire Past and Present, No 54
    THIS NUMBER HAS ARTICLES ON CATESBY IN THE MIDDLE AGES: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDY ORTHAMPTONSHIRE THE WOODLAND LANDSCAPES OF SOUTHERN NORTHAMPTONSHIRE NPAST•AND•PRESENT AN HERALDIC PUZZLE AT 56 ST MARTIN’S, STAMFORD Number 54 (2001) THORPE HALL SCHOOL, PETERBOROUGH A PARK TOO DEAR: CREATING A MODERN DEER PARK A RAILWAY STATION FOR ROTHWELL? LIEUTENANT HENRY BOWERS BOOK REVIEWS JOURNAL OF THE NORTHAMPTONSHIRE RECORD SOCIETY WOOTTON HALL PARK, NORTHAMPTON NN4 8BQ £3.00 Cover illustration: Stamford St Martin’s, 1727 (Peck’s Stamford) AND PRESENT PAST NORTHAMPTONSHIRE Number 54 2001 £3.00 Northamptonshire Record Society NORTHAMPTONSHIRE PAST AND PRESENT 2001 Number 54 CONTENTS Page Notes and News . 5 Catesby in The Middle Ages: an interdisciplinary study . 7 Jane Laughton The Woodland Landscapes of Southern Northamptonshire . 33 David Hall An Heraldic Puzzle at 56 St Martin’s, Stamford . 47 Eric Till Thorpe Hall School, Peterborough . 50 A. R. Constable A Park Too Dear: Creating a Modern Deer Park . 62 T. J. Waterfield A Railway Station for Rothwell? . 80 J. V. Gough Lieutenant Henry Bowers . 82 Stephen Hollowell Book Reviews . 88 Obituary Notice . 97 All communications regarding articles in this and future issues should be addressed to David Hall, the Hon. Editor, Northamptonshire Record Society, Wootton Hall Park, Northampton, NN4 8BQ Published by the Northamptonshire Record Society Number 54 ISSN 01490 9131 Typeset by John Hardaker, Wollaston, Northants and printed by Alden Press, Oxford OX2 0EF 5 THE NORTHAMPTONSHIRE RECORD SOCIETY (FOUNDED IN 1920) WOOTTON HALL PARK, NORTHAMPTON NN4 8BQ President Sir Hereward Wake, Bart., M.C., D.L. NOTES AND NEWS Last year we reported the work of the Mellow’s Trust and the continued publication of Peterborough Abbey medieval cartularies.
    [Show full text]
  • Trades. Bre 263
    BUCKUGHA:WS:SHlRE.] TRADES. BRE 263 J.awrence James k Son, Haddenham; Smith, Bartholomew George Edlcs- :BOOT & SHOE .REPAIRERS. Thame borough, Dul!stable Bailey Victor J. Crown la. Wycom~ Leslie Waiter, Chalfont St. Peter, .Smith }"rank, 3 William street,Slough Biggs S. 1 g Germain st. Chesham Gerrard's Cross S.O -lmith John, High street, Winslow Birch l''redk. Cnddington, .Aylesbury Litchfield Jn. Oxford st. Bletchley rd. ~m~th Joseph, 7 Oxford rd. Wycombel Gray C. Hambleden, Henley-on-Thm1 Fenny Stratford, Bletchley :Smith Wm. Park st. Bletchley road, Johnson Charles, Queen's rd. Marlow Loakes Frederick, Wing rd. Linslade, Fenny Stratford, Bletchley King James, Stratford rd.Buckingham Leighton Buzzard .Sonster James, New Bradwell, Wol- Lewis Thos. II Newland st. Wycombe Love Hy.H.New Bradwell,Wolvrtn.S.O verton S.O Newens Thomas, New road, Linslade, Lovell David, Tingewick, Buckingham Spicer John, Bierton, .Aylesbury Leighton Buzzard Lunnon & Ranee, West st. Marlow :Spring C. Brook st. Chalvey, Slough Roberts Bros.226 Desboro' rd.Wycmbe Lyman George, Stoke Goldington, 3tacey F. W. 5 Frogmoor gardens, Small Chas. Fdk. Haddenham,Thame Newport Pagnell Wycombe Mcllroy W. 7 & 13 Market sq . .Aylesbry ~tandage Geo. 1.1- Cre~don st. ~ycmbe :BRACE MANUFACTURERS Maguire & Son, 14 Brocas st. Eton, ::-.tone John, .As ton Clmton, Trmg _ . · Windsor Stroud William, London rd. Wycombe Duerdoth Frederick Wilham (& belt), Manton James, 17 Church street, Sutton John, Gerrard's Cross S.O 79 High street, Chesham Wolverton S.O Swift Robert, Padbnry, Buckingham Price & Almond, 105 & 107 Welling- Marchant C. R, Son & Garrard, Chal- Tapping Richard, Market pl.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual for Design Codes • West Northamptonshire Development Corporation • December 2009 Section Two: Context Appraisal 23
    section two Context Appraisal • Purpose of the Context Appraisal • The National Context • The Regional Context • Northampton • Daventry • Towcester • West Northamptonshire Villages • Topography and the Built Form • Employment Areas Context Appraisal Manual for Design Codes • West Northamptonshire Development Corporation • December 2009 Section Two: Context Appraisal 23 2.1 Purpose of the Context Appraisal Understanding the unique character and sense of place of the region as a whole and of the three towns and surrounding villages, is a vital prerequisite to regenerating, creating and developing new places. This context appraisal, based on fieldwork and a study of the existing literature, expands on the particular features of the towns of Northampton, Daventry and Towcester and a number of surrounding villages. The section begins with an analysis of West Northamptonshire at the national and regional levels. It covers the geographical, historic, socio-economic and spatial features that shaped its development and led to the current conditions. This is followed by a review of each town, examining the typology of movement; the historic development; and the streetscape, townscape and architecture of the various areas within each town. Together these elements embody the local distinctiveness of Northampton, Daventry and Towcester and their surrounding villages. The information contained in this section is not only applicable to development within the WNDC’s boundary but can also be drawn upon in the consideration of new development within the
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Winslow & Villages Community
    Winslow & Villages Community Board agenda Date: Thursday 26 November 2020 Time: 7.00 pm Venue: MS Teams Membership: S Renshell (Chairman), J Chilver, B Everitt, L Monger, S Raven and Sir B Stanier Bt Addington Parish Meeting; Adstock Parish Council; Beachampton Parish Council; Drayton Parslow Parish Council; Dunton Parish Meeting; Granborough Parish Council; Great Brickhill Parish Council; Great Horwood Parish Council; Hoggeston Parish Meeting; Little Horwood Parish Council; Mursley Parish Council; Nash Parish Council; Newton Longville Parish Council; North Marston Parish Council; Oving Parish Council; Padbury Parish Council; Pitchcott Parish Meeting; Soulbury Parish Council; Stewkley Parish Council; Stoke Hammond Parish Council; Swanbourne Parish Council; Thornton Parish Meeting; Whaddon Parish Council; Winslow Parish Council Please note that this meeting will be recorded and will subsequently be available to view via the Buckinghamshire Council website. Agenda Item Time Page No 1 Apologies To note any apologies for absence. 2 Minutes 3 - 8 To approve as a correct record the minutes of the meeting held on 29 September, 2020. 3 Declarations of Interest To note any declarations of interest. 4 Chairman’s Welcome Introduction from Sue Renshell, Chairman of the Winslow and Villages Community Board. 5 Introduction from Martin Dickman Introduction from Martin Dickman, Service Director, Neighbourhood Services. 6 Response to Petition 9 - 12 To note the response to the petition submitted by Great Horwood Parish Council. 7 Funding Update 13 - 30 The Community Board will receive a presentation on funding. 8 Action Group Updates The Action Groups will provide a verbal update to the Community Board. 9 COVID Workshop Presentations and discussions on COVID.
    [Show full text]
  • Buckingham Share As at 16 July 2021
    Deanery Share Statement : 2021 allocation 3AM AMERSHAM 2021 Cash Recd Bal as at % Paid Share To Date 16-Jul-21 To Date A/C No Parish £ £ £ % S4642 AMERSHAM ON THE HILL 75,869 44,973 30,896 59.3 DD S4645 AMERSHAM w COLESHILL 93,366 55,344 38,022 59.3 DD S4735 BEACONSFIELD ST MARY, MICHAEL & THOMAS 244,244 144,755 99,489 59.3 DD S4936 CHALFONT ST GILES 82,674 48,998 33,676 59.3 DD S4939 CHALFONT ST PETER 88,520 52,472 36,048 59.3 DD S4971 CHENIES & LITTLE CHALFONT 73,471 43,544 29,927 59.3 DD S4974 CHESHAM BOIS 87,147 51,654 35,493 59.3 DD S5134 DENHAM 70,048 41,515 28,533 59.3 DD S5288 FLAUNDEN 20,011 11,809 8,202 59.0 DD S5324 GERRARDS CROSS & FULMER 224,363 132,995 91,368 59.3 DD S5351 GREAT CHESHAM 239,795 142,118 97,677 59.3 DD S5629 LATIMER 17,972 7,218 10,754 40.2 DD S5970 PENN 46,370 27,487 18,883 59.3 DD S5971 PENN STREET w HOLMER GREEN 70,729 41,919 28,810 59.3 DD S6086 SEER GREEN 75,518 42,680 32,838 56.5 DD S6391 TYLERS GREEN 41,428 24,561 16,867 59.3 DD S6694 AMERSHAM DEANERY 5,976 5,976 0 0.0 Deanery Totals 1,557,501 920,018 637,483 59.1 R:\Store\Finance\FINANCE\2021\Share 2021\Share 2021Bucks Share20/07/202112:20 Deanery Share Statement : 2021 allocation 3AY AYLESBURY 2021 Cash Recd Bal as at % Paid Share To Date 16-Jul-21 To Date A/C No Parish £ £ £ % S4675 ASHENDON 5,108 2,975 2,133 58.2 DD S4693 ASTON SANDFORD 6,305 6,305 0 100.0 S4698 AYLESBURY ST MARY 49,527 23,000 26,527 46.4 S4699 AYLESBURY QUARRENDON ST PETER 7,711 4,492 3,219 58.3 DD S4700 AYLESBURY BIERTON 23,305 13,575 9,730 58.2 DD S4701 AYLESBURY HULCOTT ALL SAINTS
    [Show full text]
  • Members and Parish/Neighbourhood Councils RAIL UPDATE
    ITEM 1 TRANSPORT COMMITTEE NEWS 07 MARCH 2000 This report may be of interest to: All Members and Parish/Neighbourhood Councils RAIL UPDATE Accountable Officer: John Inman Author: Stephen Mortimer 1. Purpose 1.1 To advise the Committee of developments relating to Milton Keynes’ rail services. 2. Summary 2.1 West Coast Main Line Modernisation and Upgrade is now in the active planning stage. It will result in faster and more frequent train services between Milton Keynes Central and London, and between Milton Keynes Central and points north. Bletchley and Wolverton will also have improved services to London. 2.2 Funding for East-West Rail is now being sought from the Shadow Strategic Rail Authority (SSRA) for the western end of the line (Oxford-Bedford). Though the SSRA have permitted a bid only for a 60 m.p.h. single-track railway, excluding the Aylesbury branch and upgrade of the Marston Vale (Bedford-Bletchley) line, other Railtrack investment and possible developer contributions (yet to be investigated) may allow these elements to be included, as well as perhaps a 90 m.p.h. double- track railway. As this part of East-West Rail already exists, no form of planning permission is required; however, Transport and Works Act procedures are to be started to build the missing parts of the eastern end of the line. 2.3 New trains were introduced on the Marston Vale line, Autumn 1999. A study of the passenger accessibility of Marston Vale stations identified various desirable improvements, for which a contribution of £10,000 is required from this Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxfordshire Archdeacon's Marriage Bonds
    Oxfordshire Archdeacon’s Marriage Bond Index - 1634 - 1849 Sorted by Bride’s Parish Year Groom Parish Bride Parish 1635 Gerrard, Ralph --- Eustace, Bridget --- 1635 Saunders, William Caversham Payne, Judith --- 1635 Lydeat, Christopher Alkerton Micolls, Elizabeth --- 1636 Hilton, Robert Bloxham Cook, Mabell --- 1665 Styles, William Whatley Small, Simmelline --- 1674 Fletcher, Theodore Goddington Merry, Alice --- 1680 Jemmett, John Rotherfield Pepper Todmartin, Anne --- 1682 Foster, Daniel --- Anstey, Frances --- 1682 (Blank), Abraham --- Devinton, Mary --- 1683 Hatherill, Anthony --- Matthews, Jane --- 1684 Davis, Henry --- Gomme, Grace --- 1684 Turtle, John --- Gorroway, Joice --- 1688 Yates, Thos Stokenchurch White, Bridgett --- 1688 Tripp, Thos Chinnor Deane, Alice --- 1688 Putress, Ricd Stokenchurch Smith, Dennis --- 1692 Tanner, Wm Kettilton Hand, Alice --- 1692 Whadcocke, Deverey [?] Burrough, War Carter, Elizth --- 1692 Brotherton, Wm Oxford Hicks, Elizth --- 1694 Harwell, Isaac Islip Dagley, Mary --- 1694 Dutton, John Ibston, Bucks White, Elizth --- 1695 Wilkins, Wm Dadington Whetton, Ann --- 1695 Hanwell, Wm Clifton Hawten, Sarah --- 1696 Stilgoe, James Dadington Lane, Frances --- 1696 Crosse, Ralph Dadington Makepeace, Hannah --- 1696 Coleman, Thos Little Barford Clifford, Denis --- 1696 Colly, Robt Fritwell Kilby, Elizth --- 1696 Jordan, Thos Hayford Merry, Mary --- 1696 Barret, Chas Dadington Hestler, Cathe --- 1696 French, Nathl Dadington Byshop, Mary --- Oxfordshire Archdeacon’s Marriage Bond Index - 1634 - 1849 Sorted by
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Electorate Proforma 11Oct2012
    Electoral data 2012 2018 Using this sheet: Number of councillors: 51 51 Fill in the cells for each polling district. Please make sure that the names of each parish, parish ward and unitary ward are Overall electorate: 178,504 190,468 correct and consistant. Check your data in the cells to the right. Average electorate per cllr: 3,500 3,735 Polling Electorate Electorate Number of Electorate Variance Electorate Description of area Parish Parish ward Unitary ward Name of unitary ward Variance 2018 district 2012 2018 cllrs per ward 2012 2012 2018 Bletchley & Fenny 3 10,385 -1% 11,373 2% Stratford Bradwell 3 9,048 -14% 8,658 -23% Campbell Park 3 10,658 2% 10,865 -3% Danesborough 1 3,684 5% 4,581 23% Denbigh 2 5,953 -15% 5,768 -23% Eaton Manor 2 5,976 -15% 6,661 -11% AA Church Green West Bletchley Church Green Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1872 2,032 Emerson Valley 3 12,269 17% 14,527 30% AB Denbigh Saints West Bletchley Saints Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1292 1,297 Furzton 2 6,511 -7% 6,378 -15% AC Denbigh Poets West Bletchley Poets Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1334 1,338 Hanslope Park 1 4,139 18% 4,992 34% AD Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 2361 2,367 Linford North 2 6,700 -4% 6,371 -15% AE Simpson Simpson & Ashland Simpson Village Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 495 497 Linford South 2 7,067 1% 7,635 2% AF Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1747 2,181 Loughton Park 3 12,577 20% 14,136 26% AG Granby Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Granby Bletchley
    [Show full text]