DOCSLIB.ORG

WMA12: Mzimvubu to Keiskamma Water Management Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WMA12: Mzimvubu to Keiskamma Water Management Area DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY DIRECTORATE OF OPTIONS ANALYSIS LUKANJI REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY FEASIBILITY STUDY APPENDIX 2 ECOLOGICAL RESERVE (QUANTITY) ON THE KEI RIVER PREPARED BY IWR Source-to-Sea P O Box 122 Persequor Park 0020 Tel : 012 - 349 2991 Fax : 012 - 349 2991 e-mail : [email protected] FINAL January 2006 Title : Appendix 2 : Ecological Reserve (Quantity) on the Kei River Authors : S Koekemoer and D Louw Project Name : Lukanji Regional Water Supply Feasibility Study DWAF Report No. : P WMA 12/S00/3108 Ninham Shand Report No. : 10676/3842 Status of Report : Final First Issue : February 2004 Final Issue : January 2006 Approved for the Study Team : …………………………………… M J SHAND Ninham Shand (Pty) Ltd DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY Directorate : Options Analysis Approved for the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry by : A D BROWN Chief Engineer : Options Analysis (South) (Project Manager) L S MABUDA Director ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following specialist contributed to and participated in the Kei Reserve Specialist meeting: Drew Birkhead Hydraulics Streamflow Solutions Anton Bok Fish Anton Bok & Associates Denis Hughes Hydrology IWR Rhodes Nigel Kemper Riparian Vegetation Integrated Environmental Assessments Neels Kleynhans Fish DWAF, RQS Delana Louw Process specialist IWR Source-to-Sea Jay O'Keeffe Facilitator IWR Rhodes Nico Rossouw Water quality Ninham Shand Consulting Services Christa Thirion Invertebrates DWAF, RQS Mandy Uys Invertebrates Laughing Waters Roy Wadeson Geomorphology Private DWAF (Resource Directed Measures Office) and Ninham Shand for their participation and contribution: Rod Blackhurst Ninham Shand Alan Brown DWAF Thokozani Mbele RDM Office Retha Stassen RDM Office Program design and presentation of graphs and integration of specialist documents: Delana Louw IWR Source-to-Sea Shael Koekemoer IWR Source-to-Sea Report Editing Shael Koekemoer and Delana Louw IWR Source-to-Sea IWR Source-to-Sea Lukhanji Regional Water Supply Study Report no July 2005 Ecological Reserve (quantity) on the Kei River Page i The following specialist contributed to and participated in the Kei Reserve Specialist Report: Chapter 1: Introduction and Background Delana Louw Chapter 2: Approach: Determination of stress indices Delana Louw Neels Kleynhans Chapter 3: Approach: Ecological classification Delana Louw Neels Kleynhans Chapter 4: Approach: Determination of IFR scenarios Delana Louw Neels Kleynhans Chapter 5 – 16 Shael Koekemoer Chapter 17: Delana Louw Neels Kleynhans Christa Thirion IWR Source-to-Sea Lukhanji Regional Water Supply Study Report no July 2005 Ecological Reserve (quantity) on the Kei River Page ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND The National Water Act (No. 36 of 1998) is based on the central guiding principles of sustainability and equity. Sustainability of resource use is to be ensured by the implementation of resource protection measures, including the application of the Ecological Reserve (the quality, quantity and reliability of water required to maintain the ecological functioning of aquatic ecosystems). IWR Source-to-Sea was requested by Ninham Shand to undertake an Ecological Reserve Determination for the Quantity component on the Kei System at an Intermediate level for the major section of the study area using the Intermediate Ecological Reserve Methodology (IERM). This report documents the proceedings of a specialist meeting during which the Ecological Water Requirement (quantity) Scenarios were determined. STUDY AREA AND IFR SITES The study area for the IERM included the Black Kei upstream of its confluence with the White Kei and downstream of its confluence with the Klaas Smits River, the White Kei River below Xonxa dam, Oxkraal River below the Oxkraal Dam, Klipplaat River below Waterdown Dam. • IFR 1: Klipplaat River below Waterdown Dam. • IFR 2: On the upper Black Kei River downstream of the Klaas Smits River confluence. • IFR 3: On the lower Black Kei River above the White River confluence. • IFR 4: On the White Kei River below the Xonxa Dam and below the Indwe River confluence. ECOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION The process according to the current RDM specifications was applied. This process is under review. Very broadly the process consists of an assessment of reference conditions, the Present Ecological State (PES) (i.e. how far has the system moved from reference conditions and why), the Ecological Importance and Sensitivity (EIS) and the range of ECs which will then be addressed is specified. The results are provided below: IFR sites PES EIS REC Alternative scenario Alternative scenario IFR 1 C Moderate C B/C D IFR 2 D Moderate D - C IFR 3 C/D Moderate C/D B/C D IFR 4 C Moderate C/D B/C D IFR SCENARIO RECOMMENDATIONS IFRs represent the flow component of the Ecological Reserve. The method used during this study is a combination of the FS-R method (low flows), the Building Block Methodology and DRIFT (high flows). The FS-R indicates where natural stress has been decreased to the detriment of the natural ecosystem balance under present conditions. The results are summarised in the following table as a % of the MAR. IWR Source-to-Sea Lukhanji Regional Water Supply Study Report no July 2005 Ecological Reserve (quantity) on the Kei River Page iii IFR as % IFR as % Alternative IFR as % IFR Alternative REC of present of present scenario of present site scenario (up) MAR MAR (down) MAR IFR 1 C 24.8 B/C 29.2 D 17.5 IFR 2 D 9.2 C 14.7 - - IFR 3 C/D 11.2 B/C 20.1 D 7.8 IFR 4 C/D 20.7 B/C 30.4 D 16 The confidence specialists have in their data and their recommendations in general varied from medium-low to medium-high. ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF OPERATIONAL FLOW SCENARIOS The objective of this phase of the study was to determine the ecological (or more correctly biophysical) consequences of different flow scenarios at each IFR site. During this assessment, consideration is given on whether the IFRs are available, can be managed or supplied as well as the impact on existing users. Various alterations of the IFR to achieve the same objective or EC are considered with the objective to recommend an optimised scenario (if available). Flow scenarios were developed and tested whether the REC is met (see table below). Y = yes; N = no PES REC SC1 SC2 SC3 SC4 SC5 NO IFR IFR 1 C C Y Y Y Y Y N (?) IFR 2 D D Y Y Y Y Y N IFR 3 C/D C/D Y Y Y Y Y (?) N (?) IFR 4 C/D C/D N Y Y Y(?) N N Number of IFR sites where 3Y 4Y 4Y 4Y(?) 3Y 4N ecological objectives are 1N 1N achieved Scenario 4, 5 and No IFR are the only practical scenarios to assess as they consider existing constraints. Of these scenarios, Scenario 4 has the least ecological impact as it meets the ecological objectives at all the IFR sites. The 'No IFR' scenario is not an acceptable scenario from an ecological point of view as it does not meet the REC at any site. The Scenario 5 has the least impact on yield but cannot meet the REC at IFR 4 on the White Kei. For the Black Kei and Klipplaat River, Scenario 5 would be acceptable. A decision must be made comparing the socio-economic value and importance of the White Kei system compared to the Ecological Importance. Other factors such as the present use of Goods and Services as part of Resource Economics and the potential impact on this if the river is allowed to degrade, as well as the confidence in the IFR 4 assessment and the ecological consequences assessments should be considered to aid in the decision IWR Source-to-Sea Lukhanji Regional Water Supply Study Report no July 2005 Ecological Reserve (quantity) on the Kei River Page iv LUKANJI REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY FEASIBILITY STUDY KEI RIVER WATER QUALITY RESERVE DETERMIANTION CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ............................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Background.................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Study area ......................................................................................................................1-1 1.3 Purpose of this report..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.4 Outline of the report ...................................................................................................... 1-2 2 APPROACH: DETERMINATION OF STRESS INDICES (CHAPTER 5)....................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Fish (CJ Kleynhans) (Chapter 5.1)................................................................................ 2-1 2.2.1 Hydraulics input (A L Birkhead) ...................................................................... 2-5 2.3 Invertebrates (M Uys & C Thirion) (Chapter 5.2) ........................................................ 2-6 2.4 Riparian Vegetation (N Kemper) .................................................................................. 2-7 2.5 Natural and present day stress profiles.......................................................................... 2-8 3 APPROACH: ECOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION (CHAPTER 6)................................... 3-1 3.1 General approach........................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Reference conditions (Chapter 6.1)............................................................................... 3-6 3.3 Present Ecologial State (PES) (Chapter 6.2)................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eastern Cape Rural Transport Strategy
    Eastern Cape Rural Transport Strategy Baseline Conditions October 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Aims and objectives of the Provincial Rural Transport Plan 3 1.2 Aims and objectives of this Baseline Report 4 1.3 Structure of the Baseline Report 4 2. POLICY OVERVIEW 5 2.1 Legislative and other mandates 5 2.2Provincial Growth and Development Plan (PGDP) 7 2.3 Integrated and Sustainable Rural Development Programme (ISRDP) 8 2.4 Integrated Development Planning (IDP) 10 2.5 White Paper on Spatial Planning and Land Use Management 11 2.6 Transport policies 11 3. TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE 14 3.1 The Current Network 14 3.2 Backlogs 18 3.3 Maintenance 21 3.4 Funding 30 4. RURAL TRANSPORT SERVICES 38 2 4.1. 4.1 Introduction 38 4.2. 4.2 Rural Public Transport: Buses 39 4.3. 4.3 Rural Public Transport: Taxis 46 4.4. 4.4 Rail transport 48 4.5. 4.5 Special Needs Transport 50 4.6. 4.6 Affordability of rural public transport 51 4.7. 4.7 Safety and Security on Rural Public Transport 51 4.8. 4.8 Rural Freight Services 52 4.9. 4.9 Transport issues related to selected rural economic drivers 56 4.10. 4.10 Intermediate Means of Transport 62 4.11. 4.11 Transporting people and their goods in Port St Johns: A case study 66 4.12. 5. INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW 69 5.1 Scope of Rural Transport 69 5.2 Institutional Responsibility 71 5.3 Inter-agency cooperation and linkages 81 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Lukhanji Local Municipality
    LUKHANJI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - 2015 / 2016 1. Mayor’s Foreword ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 6 CHAPTER 1 - PREPLANNING ............................................................................................................................. 8 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 8 2. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................................. 8 3. PRE-PLANNING .......................................................................................................................................... 9 1) Organisational Arrangements in the IDP Development and Review Processes ................................................... 9 . Role players ............................................................................................................................................ 9 2) Roles and Responsibilities of Each Role Player .................................................................................... 10 3) Approved schedule for the IDP / PMS and Budget REVIEW PROCESS PLAN – 2014 / 2015Error! Bookmark not defined. Chapter 2 Situational
    [Show full text]
  • Provincial Gazette Igazethi Yephondo Provinsiale Koerant 
    PROVINCE OF THE EASTERN CAPE IPHONDO LEMPUMA KOLONI PROVINSIE OOS-KAAP Provincial Gazette Igazethi Yephondo Provinsiale Koerant BISHO/KING WILLIAM’S TOWN Vol: 28 5 Julie 2021 No: 4586 5 July 2021 N.B. The Government Printing Works will ISSN 1682-4555 not be held responsible for the quality of 04586 “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes 9 771682 455006 2 No. 4586 PROVINCIAL GAZETTE, 5 JULIE 2021 IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING WORKS WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ERRORS THAT MIGHT OCCUR DUE TO THE SUBMISSION OF INCOMPLETE / INCORRECT / ILLEGIBLE COPY. NO FUTURE QUERIES WILL BE HANDLED IN CONNECTION WITH THE ABOVE. Contents Gazette Page No. No. No. GENERAL NOTICES • ALGEMENE KENNISGEWINGS 23 Removal of Restrictions in terms of the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, 2013 (Act 16 of 2013): Erf 2833, Newton Park, Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape: Correction of general notice no. 19 of 2021 ..... 4586 3 24 Special Planning and Land Use Management Act (16/2013): Erf 1534, East London ....................................... 4586 3 PROVINCIAL NOTICES • PROVINSIALE KENNISGEWINGS 82 Eastern Cape Consumer Protection Act, 2018 (Act No. 3 of 2018): Draft Regulations in terms of the Act for public comment .................................................................................................................................................. 4586 4 83 Sea Shore Act (21/1935): Proposed Lease of a Site situated below the High-Water Mark of the Tyalumna River, Applicant: Susan Booth ............................................................................................................................ 4586 49 84 Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act (16/2013): Erf 14608, Walmer (representing Portion A of Erf 7005, Walmer), Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape .................................................................................................... 4586 50 85 Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act (16/2013): Erf 30.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Assessment Report
    CES: PROPOSED UMOYILANGA ANCILLARY INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ON PORTIONS OF THE FARMS BLAUW BAADJIES VLEY 189 AND FARM 188, CACADU DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE Archaeological Impact Assessment Prepared for: CES Prepared by: Exigo Sustainability ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (AIA) ON PORTIONS OF THE FARMS BLAUW BAADJIES VLEY 189 AND FARM 188 FOR THE PROPOSED UMOYILANGA ANCILLARY INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, CACADU DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE Conducted for: CES Compiled by: Nelius Kruger (BA, BA Hons. Archaeology Pret.) Reviewed by: Caroline Evans (CES) DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST Name Institution Caroline Evans CES DOCUMENT HISTORY Date Version Status 5 March 2021 1.0 Draft 8 March 2021 2.0 Final Draft 24 June 2021 3.0 Final 3 CES: Umoyilanga Ancillary Infrastructure Development Archaeological Impact Assessment Report DECLARATION I, Nelius Le Roux Kruger, declare that – • I act as the independent specialist; • I am conducting any work and activity relating to the proposed Umoyilanga Ancillary Infrastructure Development Project in an objective manner, even if this results in views and findings that are not favourable to the client; • I declare that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity in performing such work; • I have the required expertise in conducting the specialist report and I will comply with legislation, including the relevant Heritage Legislation (National Heritage Resources Act no. 25 of 1999, Human Tissue Act 65 of 1983 as amended, Removal of Graves and
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Capital: the Shaping of Social Relations in the Stormberg, 1880-1910
    UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND FACULTY OF HUMANITIES SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY COAL CAPITAL: THE SHAPING OF SOCIAL RELATIONS IN THE STORMBERG, 1880-1910 PhD PAT GIBBS 330289 Supervisors: Professor Phillip Bonner Dr Noor Nieftaqodien Professor Anne Mager Port Elizabeth 2014 i Abstract This thesis is an analysis of the interaction of a variety of communities that coalesced around the coal fields in the environs of the town of Molteno in the Stormberg mountains, during the late Victorian period and the first decade of the 20th century. An influx of mining and merchant capitalists, bankers and financiers, skilled miners and artisans from overseas and Thembu labourers from across the Kei River flooded into what had been a quasi-capitalist world dominated mainly by Afrikaner stock farmers, some English farmers and Thembu and Khoi sharecroppers and labourers. It also examines the brief life-span of a coal mining enterprise, which initially held out the hope of literally fuelling South Africa’s industrial revolution, and its relationship with the economically and socially significant railway, which it drew into the area. This capitalisation of an early capitalist zone on the northern border of the Cape has demanded an analysis of the intersecting economies of mining, farming and urbanisation as well as of the race, class and ethnic formations generated by this interaction. In delineating the day-to-day minutiae of events, this thesis seeks to reveal a microcosmic view of the fortunes and identities of the associated communities and to present a distinctive, regional study of a hitherto unknown and early aspect of South Africa’s mineral revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • National Norms and Standards for School Funding
    .... Ir.._. r. t -.c.~ , ~1l"- ~ J' .•• A·· •• .. I =.;'''':. .. - "I" ]"' '. ·F.. .. .ir:' '.. .f, '- . ' ) '-\0 . ........:.....;...-:..,., " I y,_ .. ~ . P:~ . :l't~. - ~ ;'~I.-t£:£_ I II:IIIJAa. ~ 'P:.~. ';r~. I ,-~:, ~ ~f' ~!..r:i.l''liG. : c..' r'fIUI~OF?CItdOt'.' .', ~.~~l,:,';i~::.,;.~ .!i'o::~-? II ''' : "Ii < :I\; . 'oi.,;. :-~ '.:1'~ ~!.'r' ~' .., . .....~ . ~ ~ ' z. :",-t. .., .. l. ;~ -:'T--'" _; _'~Y' , 'JI,. " '." ~. ~" &. t.~i~ """To'I" . · ' 1 , ~ ~ ~.,..... ";1 , ' -, , .'I-}. ' "'?.J - ~ ~ .'LJ:;;.",l.1~~' -I ',,- . ~ \.I·- ~r' ~!I' .~ . r 1:0'" ... i' " 't: .r,. •...'. ,.,•• c; ,... .. f:.... .;:t _, _ .. ' . li t "". ' .. I ~y.,,~ .;~ _., ~ . ~ ,' "';\ · 1\ 1 _--. -r .J ~1, 1 ~~?}I'~ t1;r_ ~ .", ,,"" ~",~ ~-<~;: J;~ ' -~\.k. '~jr:'~~ I ~ ~ :f _ ~~~ .~ .:.I! :;ft~ ~~Lr;t.:r ~ AI · ··~~JI .\.\ '(; ~: .~ ~;r~_r:'" ~':~ ' ..,: ~~I; : ~_ f .-., r~ --"",! _ 4 _ ~~, _ , _ ,'f: .... J:.... • ••• -;., !. ...- ' " ..., ~ ~ ,. ~ : 401272 NKWENKWEZI SP SCHOOL Primary ,NKWENKWEZI AlA,ENGCOBO,5050 NGCOBOI 2 2051 R 740.00 600594 NOBUNTU JS SCHOOL Combined ,SIFONONDILE NA.. 5460 NGCOBOI 2 2641 R 740.00 600647 NYALASA JS SCHOOL Combined ,NYALASA AlA,CALA,5455 NGCOBOI 2 1951 R 740.00 400906 PAKAMISA SP SCHOOL Combined ,ELUCWECWE NA,ENGCOBO,5050 NGCOBOI 2 3521 R 740.00 600686 QIBA JS SCHOOL Combined QIBA NA"CALA,5455 NGCOBOI 2 1751 R 740.00 400949 QOBA PJS SCHOOL Combined ,ELUCWECWE AlA,ENGCOBO,5050 NGCOBOI 2 5051 R 740.00 400973 RYNO STATE AIDED SCHOOL Combined ,RYNO FARM,ELLlOT,5460 NGCOBOI 2 3681 R 740.00 600742 SIFONONDILE JS SCHOOL Combined SIFONONDILE AlA"CALA,5460 NGCOBOI 2 2021 R 740.00 600743 SIFONONDILE SS SCHOOL Secondary SIFONONDILE AlA,CALA,,5455 NGCOBOI 2 771 R 740.00 Combined ~ NGCOBOI 2 2691 R 740.00 600745 SIGWELA JS SCHOOL MANZIMAHLE STORE,NDUM-NDUM LOC.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-2015 Chdm Final Idp Review
    Chris Hani District Municipality 2014-2015 IDP Review Final May Council adopted 2014-2015 CHDM FINAL IDP REVIEW The Executive Mayor Chris Hani District Municipality 15 Bells Road Queenstown 5319 www.chrishanidm.gov.za Tel: 045 808 4600 Fax: 045 838 1556 1 Chris Hani District Municipality 2014-2015 IDP Review Final May Council adopted THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background to this Document The CHDM Council has adopted a 5 year IDP which is for 2012-2017, by the 30th May 2012. By law IDP has to be reviewd annually to accommodate changes as the world changes, meaning by 2014- 2015 there should be a 2nd IDP Review which must not be in contrast with its original 5 year IDP hence this document which is the actual 1st IDP review of the 5 year Plan. It is submitted and prepared in fulfilment of the Municipality’s legal obligation in terms of Section 32 of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000. Previous Comments from the MEC of Local Government has been taken into consideration and inputted. In addition to the legal requirement for every Municipality to compile an Integrated Development Plan, the Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 also requires that: . the IDP be implemented; . the Municipality monitors and evaluates its performance with regards to the IDP’s implementation; . the IDP be reviewed annually to effect improvements. Section 25 of the Municipal Systems Act deals with the adoption of the IDP and states that: “Each municipal council must adopt a single, inclusive and strategic plan for the development of the municipality which
    [Show full text]
  • 43568 31-7 Roadcarrierp
    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID AFRIKA Regulation Gazette No. 10177 Regulasiekoerant July Vol. 661 31 2020 No. 43568 Julie PART 1 OF 2 ISSN 1682-5843 N.B. The Government Printing Works will 43568 not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes 9 771682 584003 AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure 2 No. 43568 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 31 JULY 2020 IMPORTANT NOTICE OF OFFICE RELOCATION Private Bag X85, PRETORIA, 0001 149 Bosman Street, PRETORIA Tel: 012 748 6197, Website: www.gpwonline.co.za URGENT NOTICE TO OUR VALUED CUSTOMERS: PUBLICATIONS OFFICE’S RELOCATION HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY SUSPENDED. Please be advised that the GPW Publications office will no longer move to 88 Visagie Street as indicated in the previous notices. The move has been suspended due to the fact that the new building in 88 Visagie Street is not ready for occupation yet. We will later on issue another notice informing you of the new date of relocation. We are doing everything possible to ensure that our service to you is not disrupted. As things stand, we will continue providing you with our normal service from the current location at 196 Paul Kruger Street, Masada building. Customers who seek further information and or have any questions or concerns are free to contact us through telephone 012 748 6066 or email Ms Maureen Toka at [email protected] or cell phone at 082 859 4910. Please note that you will still be able to download gazettes free of charge from our website www.gpwonline.co.za.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Assistance Act: Designation of Points As Paypoints for Payment Of
    4 No. 39463 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 1 DECEMBER 2015 GOVERNMENT NOTICES • GOEWERMENTSKENNISGEWINGS Social Development, Department of/ Maatskaplike Ontwikkeling, Departement van DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT NO. 1198 01 DECEMBER 2015 1198 Social Assistance Act (13/2004): Designation of points as paypoints, for the payment of social grants 39463 "In line with the Regulations to the Social Assistance Act, Act 13 of 2004, the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) hereby designates the following points as paypoints, for the payment of social grants": This gazette is also available free online at www.gpwonline.co.za STAATSKOERANT, 1 DESEMBER 2015 No. 39463 5 NEW PP NUMBER PP_NAME MUNICIPALITY DISTRICT PROVINCE X Y 230627 QUZINI Amahlathi Local Municipality Amathole District Municipality Eastern Cape 27.36023 -32.81577 230628 MBAXA Amahlathi Local Municipality Amathole District Municipality Eastern Cape 27.39843 -32.76512 230629 GUBEVU Amahlathi Local Municipality Amathole District Municipality Eastern Cape 27.42832 -32.7299 230701 EDONQABA COMMUNITY HALL Amahlathi Local Municipality Amathole District Municipality Eastern Cape 27.46743 -32.72872 230702 BORDER POST Amahlathi Local Municipality Amathole District Municipality Eastern Cape 27.50242 -32.72377 230703 MAHLATI (RAMNYIBA) Amahlathi Local Municipality Amathole District Municipality Eastern Cape 27.34725 -32.79852 230704 MXALANGA Amahlathi Local Municipality Amathole District Municipality Eastern Cape 27.37734 -32.73823 230705 CWENGCWE Amahlathi Local Municipality Amathole District
    [Show full text]
  • EC Chmain 032018 Komani.Pdf
    !C !.C^ !C$ñ ^!C ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C ^ !C^ !C !C !C !C !C^ !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C ^$ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ ^!C !C !C !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ ^ !C !C ñ !C !C !C $ !C !C !C!C ^ !C !C ^ !C !C ñ !C !C ^ !C ñ!.C !C !C ñ !C ^ !C !C ^ ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C ñ !C !C ^ !C ñ !C !C !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ñ !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C ñ!C ^!C !. ^ !C !C !C ^ !C !C ^ ñ $ ^$!C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C !.^ $ !C !C ñ !C !C ^ !C !C !C $ ^ !C !C $!C !C $ !C !C ñ !. !C !C !C!C !C ñ!C!. ^ ^ ^ !C $!.!C^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C!C !. !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !.ñ!C ^ !C !Cñ !C !C !C ñ !.^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^!Cñ ^$ !C ^ñ!C !C ñ!C!.^ !C !. ^ !C !C ^ñ !. !C $^ ñ^!C ^ ^ !C ^ ñ ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ !C $ !. ñ!C !C !C ^ ñ!C.^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^!.$C !. !. !C !C !C!. ^ ^ !C !C^ !C !C !C !C ñ !C !. $!C^ !C !C !C !C !C !.
    [Show full text]
  • First Draft Idp Review for 2021-22 Financial Year
    FIRST DRAFT IDP REVIEW FOR 2021-22 FINANCIAL YEAR CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 1 Background. ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Legislative Framework .................................................................................................................................. 3 IDP Assessment by MEC COGTA ................................................................................................................ 6 Development Planning Process for Enoch Mgijima Municipality. ................................................................. 6 Framework and Driving Force behind the IDP .............................................................................................. 6 IDP/Budget Process Plan Review for 2021/22 financial year ....................................................................... 6 The Purpose of the IDP/Budget Process Plan. ............................................................................................. 7 Institutional Arrangements. ........................................................................................................................... 7 Locality in Context ........................................................................................................................................ 9 MBD Circular 8/2015: Re-Determination
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Town C0340016 Humansdorp Dc C0340015 K P a C0740002 Dias Dc C0340024 Annexure A
    ANNEXURE A 203 TOWN NAME/FARM PROVINCE 1 ABERDEEN EASTERN CAPE 2 ADDO EASTERN CAPE 3 ADELAIDE EASTERN CAPE 4 ADENDORP EASTERN CAPE 5 AGNES EASTERN CAPE 6 ALEXANDRIA EASTERN CAPE 7 ALGOA PARK EASTERN CAPE 8 ALICE EASTERN CAPE 9 ALICEDALE EASTERN CAPE 10 ALIWAL NORTH EASTERN CAPE 11 AMANINZI EASTERN CAPE 12 AMSTERDAMHOEK EASTERN CAPE 13 ANGOLA EASTERN CAPE 14 ARMOED EASTERN CAPE 15 ASTON BAY EASTERN CAPE 16 BARKLY EAST EASTERN CAPE 17 BATHURST EASTERN CAPE 18 BAY WEST EASTERN CAPE 19 BEACHVIEW EASTERN CAPE 20 BEDFORD EASTERN CAPE 21 BETHELSDORP EASTERN CAPE 22 BHONGWENI EASTERN CAPE 23 BLINKWATER EASTERN CAPE 24 BLOEMENDAL EASTERN CAPE 25 BLUE HORIZON BAY EASTERN CAPE 26 BOESMANSRIVIERMOND EASTERN CAPE 27 BOKNESSTRAND EASTERN CAPE 28 BONTRUG EASTERN CAPE 29 BRAAK KLOOF VILLAGE EASTERN CAPE 30 BRAK KLOOF VILLAGE EASTERN CAPE 31 BURGHERSDORP EASTERN CAPE 32 CANNON ROCKS EASTERN CAPE 33 CATHCART EASTERN CAPE 34 CHARLO EASTERN CAPE 35 CLARENDON MARINE EASTERN CAPE 36 CLARKSON EASTERN CAPE 37 COEGA EASTERN CAPE 38 COLCHESTER EASTERN CAPE 39 COLDSTREAM EASTERN CAPE 40 COLLEEN GLEN EASTERN CAPE 41 COOKHOUSE EASTERN CAPE 42 COTSWOLD EASTERN CAPE 43 CRADOCK EASTERN CAPE 44 CROCKARTS HOPE EASTERN CAPE 45 CROSSWAYS EASTERN CAPE 46 DARLINGTON EASTERN CAPE 47 DE HOOP EASTERN CAPE 48 DENHOLME EASTERN CAPE 49 DESPATCH EASTERN CAPE 50 DORDRECHT EASTERN CAPE 51 DUKATHOLE EASTERN CAPE 52 ELLIOT EASTERN CAPE 53 EMTHONTSI EASTERN CAPE 54 ENON EASTERN CAPE 55 FAIRVIEW EASTERN CAPE 56 FERNGLEN EASTERN CAPE 57 FITCHHOLME EASTERN CAPE 58 FORT BEAUFORT EASTERN
    [Show full text]