April 2019 Venezuela Presentation 051019 English

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

April 2019 Venezuela Presentation 051019 English Venezuela National Public Opinion Survey April 2019 Methodology Figure 1 ❖ National survey o Conducted April 11 to 28, 2019 o 980 face-to-face interviews o Margin of error is +/- 3.1 at the 95% confidence level o Demographically and geographically representative Conclusions Figure 2 ❖ Extreme polarization ❖ Rejection of Maduro regime, but base of support ❖ Strong support for Guaidó ❖ U.S. and allied countries viewed positively ❖ Support for elections under Guaidó and targeted sanctions ❖ Division on military foreign intervention ❖ Chávez’s legacy mixed Maduro Widely Rejected, but Has a Base of Support Figure 3 Political blocs Figure 4 Political Blocs PSUV Supporters of anti-regime political parties 28 31 No party affiliation 41 Demographic breakdown of political blocs Figure 5 PSUV Anti-regime Unaffiliated 18 - 29 32 43 40 30 - 39 23 24 22 40 - 49 18 14 23 50 - 59 18 14 11 50+ years: 50+ years: 50+ years: 60+ 8 26 4 18 5 16 Some high school 27 17 21 High school graduates 54 48 45 Technical studies/some univ 12 25 26 University grad/post-grad 6 9 8 Rural 32 17 18 Urban 64 78 78 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80 Profound dissatisfaction, but regime maintains considerable base Figure 6 Generally speaking, would you say the situation in the country is going in a very good, good, bad, or very bad direction? Very good Very good/good Very bad Very bad/bad 100 90 98 90 80 70 75 71 60 68 50 54 40 45 30 29 20 24 10 2 7 9 0 3 1 0 0 Total PSUV Anti-regime Unaffiliated Poor rating for Maduro's performance, and extraordinary polarization Figure 7 In general terms, how would you rate the government of Nicolás Maduro? Excellent/good Very bad/bad Excellent Excellent/good Very bad Very bad/bad February June April 2018 2018 2019 April 2019 – Bloc 100 100 99 90 90 95 80 75 74 73 80 86 70 70 69 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 24 23 25 10 10 12 0 3 0 0 6 PSUV Anti-regime Unaffiliated Maduro has lost support from lower social classes Figure 8 In general terms, how would you rate the government of Nicolás Maduro? Excellent Excellent/good Very bad Very bad/bad Education 100 90 80 84 82 70 70 60 66 65 60 50 40 49 43 30 31 20 29 10 16 17 0 Some High school Technical studies/ University grad/ high school graduates some university post-grad Venezuelans reject other PSUV leaders Figure 9 Now, I'd like to rate your feelings toward some people or institutions with one hundred meaning a VERY WARM, FAVORABLE feeling; zero meaning a VERY COLD, UNFAVORABLE feeling; and fifty meaning not particularly warm or cold. Favorable Unfavorable 100 90 80 70 72 68 69 60 50 40 30 26 20 23 24 10 0 Nicolás Maduro Diosdado Cabello Vladimir Padrino Opinions of military and their families dovetail with those of civilians Figure 10 Now, I'd like to rate your feelings toward some people or institutions with one hundred meaning a VERY WARM, FAVORABLE feeling; zero meaning a VERY COLD, UNFAVORABLE feeling; and fifty meaning not particularly warm or cold. Favorable Unfavorable Nicolás Maduro Diosdado Cabello Vladimir Padrino 100 90 80 70 69 71 72 69 60 65 68 50 40 30 20 28 26 23 23 25 24 10 0 Soldiers/ Non-military Soldiers/ Non-military Soldiers/ Non-military family in families family in families family in families military military military Government blamed for economic crisis and blackouts Figure 11 And who do you think is to blame for the economic Who is to blame for the electric blackout in situation in Venezuela: the Maduro government, the Venezuela: the Maduro government, the United United States, the opposition, or private States, the opposition, or private companies? companies? The government 64 The government 68 United States 12 United States 16 The opposition 12 The opposition 9 Private companies 4 Private companies 1 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80 Frustration with rejection of humanitarian aid Figure 12 Do you think that the government of Nicolás Maduro should have allowed the entry of humanitarian assistance provided by the United States, Brazil and other countries that recognize Juan Guaidó or do you think the Maduro government was right to block the entry of humanitarian aid into the country? Total Bloc 100 90 96 93 80 78 25 70 60 50 40 30 73 20 10 15 4 5 0 PSUV Anti-regime Unaffiliated Allowed Blocked Allowed Blocked Disapproval of Maduro-backed institutions Figure 13 Now, I'm going to read some institutions: When I read each name, please tell me if you strongly approve, approve, disapprove or strongly disapprove of the role that institution has played in the present political situation. Approve Disapprove 100 90 80 70 67 66 60 63 59 50 40 38 30 34 31 33 20 10 0 Asamblea Nacional Asamblea Nacional Tribunal Supremo Consejo Nacional Constituyente de Justicia Electoral Large-scale migration will continue, with political impact Figure 14 Thinking about the next few months, what would you prefer: move to another country or stay in Venezuela? Total Bloc 100 90 96 9 80 70 32 60 50 40 47 40 43 30 36 56 20 8 10 4 0 15 0 PSUV Anti-regime Unaffiliated Move to another country Stay in Venezuela Depends on how things go Move to another country Stay in Venezuela Depends on how things go Strong Backing for Guaidó Figure 15 Guaidó is only politician with favorable rating Figure 16 I would like to measure your feelings towards some people and institutions. Favorable Unfavorable 100 90 80 70 60 50 52 54 54 40 45 39 30 36 29 30 20 10 0 Henrique Capriles Leopoldo López María Corina Machado Juan Guaidó Confidence in Guaidó’s leadership Figure 17 How would you rate the role played by Juan How much confidence do you have in Juan Guaidó Guaidó as interim president appointed by the to lead a political transition in Venezuela: a lot, National Assembly: excellent, good, bad or very some, little or no confidence? bad? Excellent Excellent/good A lot A lot/some Very bad Very bad/bad None None/little 100 100 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 59 50 58 50 40 40 39 30 30 33 32 30 20 20 22 10 16 10 0 0 Guaidó seen as more than just a transition figure Figure 18 If presidential elections are held while Guaidó is interim president, do you think he should run as a candidate or should he only serve as president during the transition? Total Bloc 100 90 80 85 70 28 60 65 68 50 40 30 60 20 10 14 13 15 0 PSUV Anti-regime Unaffiliated Run as candidate Only transitional Run as candidate Only transitional Guaidó would easily defeat Maduro Figure 19 If presidential elections are held this year, and the candidates are Nicolás Maduro and Juan Guaidó, for whom would you vote? Total Bloc 100 90 95 93 8 80 70 28 75 60 50 40 30 20 61 10 6 1 3 1 2 13 0 PSUV Anti-regime Unaffiliated Maduro Guaidó Don't know yet Maduro Guaidó Don't know yet Maduro would lose election under any scenario Figure 20 And if the candidates were Nicolás Maduro and And if the candidates were Nicolás Maduro, Leopoldo López, for whom would you vote? Leopoldo López and Henry Falcón, for whom would you vote? 100 100 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 57 50 48 40 40 30 30 28 27 20 20 10 10 9 10 9 0 0 Maduro López No sabe Maduro López Falcón No sabe todavía todavía Support for Elections Under Guaidó and Targeted Sanctions Figure 21 Clear majority wants Armed Forces to support Guaidó Figure 22 And what do you want the members of the armed forces to do: maintain their loyalty to Maduro and the military high command or support the government of Juan Guaidó? Total Bloc 100 90 97 91 80 70 31 60 67 50 40 58 30 20 10 1 2 9 0 PSUV Anti-regime Unaffiliated Maduro Guaidó Maduro Guaidó Soldiers and their families want military to support Guaidó Figure 23 And what do you want the members of the armed forces to do: maintain their loyalty to Maduro and the military high command or support the government of Juan Guaidó? Maduro Guaidó 100 90 80 70 60 59 50 55 40 30 33 31 20 10 0 Soldiers/ Non-military families family in military Opponents support amnesty for government and army Figure 24 As you know, Juan Guaidó has offered an amnesty to senior government officials, including Nicolás Maduro, and members of the army who support a transition to a new constitutional government. Crimes against humanity, such as murder and torture, would be exempt from amnesty. Do you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or strongly disagree with amnesty for government officials and army members who support a transition to a new constitutional government? Strongly agree Strongly disagree Strongly/somewhat agree Strongly/somewhat disagree 100 90 80 70 77 60 70 62 64 50 52 40 42 30 35 36 20 29 28 20 24 13 10 6 16 15 0 Total PSUV Anti-regime Unaffiliated Support for elections under Guaidó, sanctions and action by army Figure 25 Now I am going to read you a list of possible ways to solve the political situation in Venezuela.
Recommended publications
  • Redalyc.LOS TÉRMINOS DE LA CRISIS VENEZOLANA
    Boletín de Lingüística ISSN: 0798-9709 [email protected] Universidad Central de Venezuela Venezuela Lovón Cueva, Marco Antonio; Pita Garcia, Paula Sharon LOS TÉRMINOS DE LA CRISIS VENEZOLANA Boletín de Lingüística, vol. XXVIII, núm. 45-46, enero-diciembre, 2016, pp. 79-110 Universidad Central de Venezuela Caracas, Venezuela Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=34754747004 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto BOLETÍN DE LINGÜÍSTICA, XXVIII/45-46 / Ene - Dic, 2016: 79-110 79 LOS TÉRMINOS DE LA CRISIS VENEZOLANA Marco Antonio Lovón Cueva Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC) [email protected] Paula Sharon Pita Garcia Universidad Ricardo Palma (URP) [email protected] RESUMEN En los últimos años, en Venezuela, el contexto político-económico, entre la continuidad del régimen y el descontento social, ha ocasionado que los venezolanos inventen y recreen una serie de palabras para expresarse sobre dicho acontecimiento. Este trabajo lexicográfico y lexicológico recoge y analiza dichas voces, tales como majunche, pupitrazo, boliburgués. Cada entrada lexicográfica presenta una definición, alguna precisión etimológica, una marca gramatical, una marca sociolingüística, un ejemplo de uso, y alguna nota lexicográfica. Los datos han sido recopilados de distintas fuentes, particularmente de sitios web, y validados por hablantes del país. La investigación concluye con la importancia de recoger las distintas expresiones lingüísticas de esta coyuntura como una forma de consignar una realidad que reclama ser comprendida y atendida.
    [Show full text]
  • Predators 2021 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 PREDATORS 2021 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Azerbaijan 167/180* Eritrea 180/180* Isaias AFWERKI Ilham Aliyev Born 2 February 1946 Born 24 December 1961 > President of the Republic of Eritrea > President of the Republic of Azerbaijan since 19 May 1993 since 2003 > Predator since 18 September 2001, the day he suddenly eliminated > Predator since taking office, but especially since 2014 his political rivals, closed all privately-owned media and jailed outspoken PREDATORY METHOD: Subservient judicial system journalists Azerbaijan’s subservient judicial system convicts journalists on absurd, spurious PREDATORY METHOD: Paranoid totalitarianism charges that are sometimes very serious, while the security services never The least attempt to question or challenge the regime is regarded as a threat to rush to investigate physical attacks on journalists and sometimes protect their “national security.” There are no more privately-owned media, only state media assailants, even when they have committed appalling crimes. Under President with Stalinist editorial policies. Journalists are regarded as enemies. Some have Aliyev, news sites can be legally blocked if they pose a “danger to the state died in prison, others have been imprisoned for the past 20 years in the most or society.” Censorship was stepped up during the war with neighbouring appalling conditions, without access to their family or a lawyer. According to Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh and the government routinely refuses to give the information RSF has been getting for the past two decades, journalists accreditation to foreign journalists.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Dangerous Threats to Our Nation's Borders
    TESTIMONY OF AMBASSADOR ROGER F. NORIEGA BEFORE THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT “A Line in the Sand: Assessing Dangerous Threats to Our Nation’s Borders” Friday, November 16, 2012 Room 311, Cannon House Office Building Washington, DC Mr. Chairman, I applaud you and other members of the Subcommittee for your continued efforts to study and expose the evolving threats to the U.S. homeland that are developing beyond our borders. The Subcommittee’s published reports on this subject contain a sobering and insightful appraisal of the menacing cooperation between narcotraffickers and the Islamic terrorist group Hezbollah in our hemisphere. As a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, I head a project to examine and expose the dangerous alliance between the Venezuelan regime of Hugo Chávez and Iran. To date, we have conducted dozens of interviews with experts from throughout the world and with eyewitnesses on the ground in the region regarding Hezbollah’s offensive in the Americas. We also have obtained reams of official Venezuelan and Iranian documents, only a few of which we have published to support our conclusions. In addition, I have worked for most of my professional life to understand and obstruct the illicit production and distribution of illegal narcotics and associated crimes of deadly drug syndicates. While much attention has been paid to the bloody confrontation between authorities in Mexico and several Central American countries with the transnational narcotrafficking organizations, there is virtually no recognition of the simple fact that, for the last 6-7 years, much of the cocaine from South America makes its way northward with the material support of the government of Venezuela.
    [Show full text]
  • Encuesta Nacional Ómnibus Julio-Agosto 2015 Fuente De Íconos: Thenounproject.Com Índice De Contenido
    Encuesta Nacional Julio-Agosto Ómnibus 2015 Encuesta Nacional Ómnibus: 999 hogares Error máximo admisible ±3,04% Fecha de campo: del 10 al 23 de julio de 2015 Empresa afiliada a: Fuente de íconos: thenounproject.com Índice de contenido 1. Metodología y contexto 2. Situación país 3. Evaluación de gestión 4. Elecciones parlamentarias 2015 Encuesta Nacional Ómnibus Julio-Agosto 2015 Fuente de íconos: thenounproject.com Índice de contenido 5. Situación económica del país 5.1 Abastecimiento. 5.2. Inflación . 6. Situación política del país 6.1 Política internacional . 6.2 Protestas en el país .6.3 Otros temas . Encuesta Nacional Ómnibus Julio-Agosto 2015 Fuente de íconos: thenounproject.com Índice de contenido 6. Situación política del país 6.4 Sobre unas primarias de Oposición . 6.5 Sobre Maduro y su futuro . 6.6 Autodefinición política e identificación partidista . Encuesta Nacional Ómnibus Julio-Agosto 2015 Fuente de íconos: thenounproject.com 1. Metodología y contexto Fuente de íconos: thenounproject.com Metodología de la investigación ¿Cómo se hizo? Ficha Técnica Personas naturales, de sexo masculino y Universo de estudio femenino, mayores de 18 años y de estratos socioeconómicos A/B, C, D y E Tamaño de la muestra 999 personas Error máximo admisible ±3,04% Nivel de confianza 95% Tipo de muestreo En hogares Polietapico Recolección de la (por género, edad, estrato socioeconómico y información región) Fecha de campo del 10 al 23 de julio de 2015 Encuesta Nacional Ómnibus Julio-Agosto 2015 2. Situación país Fuente de íconos: thenounproject.com
    [Show full text]
  • Triangulación Mediática Contra El Diputado Diosdado Cabello Presidente De La Asamblea Nacional De La República Bolivariana De Venezuela
    República Bolivariana de Venezuela Asamblea Nacional Comisión Permanente del Poder Popular y Medios de Comunicación Caracas – Venezuela TRIANGULACIÓN MEDIÁTICA CONTRA EL DIPUTADO DIOSDADO CABELLO PRESIDENTE DE LA ASAMBLEA NACIONAL DE LA REPÚBLICA BOLIVARIANA DE VENEZUELA Informe presentado por la Subcomisión de Medios de la Asamblea Nacional Aprobado por la Comisión Permanente del Poder Popular y Medios de Comunicación en la Reunión Ordinaria de fecha miércoles 25 de marzo de 2015 y por la Sesión Plenaria de la Asamblea Nacional del día martes 21 de abril de 2015. 1 República Bolivariana de Venezuela Asamblea Nacional Comisión Permanente del Poder Popular y Medios de Comunicación Caracas – Venezuela PLANTEAMIENTO DEL PROBLEMA: Información y mentira Con fecha 27 de enero de 2015, el diario El Nacional de Caracas, en su versión digital, publica bajo el rótulo “Última hora”, la siguiente información: ESCOLTA DE DIOSDADO CABELLO LO ACUSA EN WASHINGTON DE NARCOTRÁFICO El rotativo venezolano cita como fuente al periódico de Miami, Diario las Américas. Este, a su vez, remite al español ABC como su fuente de información. A partir de esta triangulación mediática Madrid-Miami-Caracas, la información se extiende por el mundo hasta difuminarse el rastro de la fuente original y diluirse, aparentemente la responsabilidad informativa y editorial La versión de ABC aparece bajo el siguiente titular: EL ESCOLTA DEL NUMERO DOS CHAVISTA HUYE A EE.UU. Y LE ACUSA DE NARCO -Salazar testificará contra Cabello en Washington Enero 27, 2015. 2 República Bolivariana de Venezuela Asamblea Nacional Comisión Permanente del Poder Popular y Medios de Comunicación Caracas – Venezuela El lead o encabezamiento de la información precisa: “Leamsy Salazar, el que hasta ahora era jefe de seguridad del Presidente de la Asamblea de Venezuela, Diosdado Cabello, que a su vez es el número dos del régimen de Nicolás Maduro, ha huido y se encuentra en Estados Unidos.
    [Show full text]
  • Article on Venezuela Crisis
    Article On Venezuela Crisis Stereoscopic and mettled Rodger disorientated, but Wit presumably panelled her marabou. Laurie usually snatches over or twirl unmindfully when sludgier Torrin schematising jolly and jestingly. If infusible or defunctive Frederic usually advantage his fake enregisters parliamentarily or goad coevally and alphanumerically, how Asiatic is Anson? Both inside and children under hugo chávez had lost to interchange all reported death and crisis on venezuela at the venezuelan intelligence agents and emergency In venezuela objected, forecasting an article on venezuela crisis than coordinating with black market mechanism into neighboring latin america. No maior hospital lacked transparency and hyperinflation, meaning and journalists, curtailing even surpass the university enrollments, and other periods of article on venezuela crisis; the economic downturn in. Class citizens to the article to arrest lópez is far principally contributed to elect him and sustain the article on venezuela crisis in an increase the request timed out of the economic crisis; their humanitarian visa de. Your inbox for a situation for businesses and that defending democracy. How maduro administration has jailed opposition members of crisis affected industries for achieving the article on venezuela crisis worse. To one possible in crisis in crisis facing trial to be elected mayors of article is. It was no easy paths out. The article examines the latest humanitarian action and crisis: possible future liberal democracy and approved of article on venezuela crisis the. When venezuela crisis, but not seem dubious in poor by speculators or purpose of article on venezuela crisis is unrealistic to the article was being forced staff reduction in parliament clearly suggests there has grown among foreign banks from! But impossible for corruption or parallel concern for products here the article on venezuela crisis under the article examines the.
    [Show full text]
  • Venezuela: Issues for Congress, 2013-2016
    Venezuela: Issues for Congress, 2013-2016 Mark P. Sullivan Specialist in Latin American Affairs January 23, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43239 Venezuela: Issues for Congress, 2013-2016 Summary Although historically the United States had close relations with Venezuela, a major oil supplier, friction in bilateral relations increased under the leftist, populist government of President Hugo Chávez (1999-2013), who died in 2013 after battling cancer. After Chávez’s death, Venezuela held presidential elections in which acting President Nicolás Maduro narrowly defeated Henrique Capriles of the opposition Democratic Unity Roundtable (MUD), with the opposition alleging significant irregularities. In 2014, the Maduro government violently suppressed protests and imprisoned a major opposition figure, Leopoldo López, along with others. In December 2015, the MUD initially won a two-thirds supermajority in National Assembly elections, a major defeat for the ruling United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV). The Maduro government subsequently thwarted the legislature’s power by preventing three MUD representatives from taking office (denying the opposition a supermajority) and using the Supreme Court to block bills approved by the legislature. For much of 2016, opposition efforts were focused on recalling President Maduro through a national referendum, but the government slowed down the referendum process and suspended it indefinitely in October. After an appeal by Pope Francis, the government and most of the opposition (with the exception of Leopoldo López’s Popular Will party) agreed to talks mediated by the Vatican along with the former presidents of the Dominican Republic, Spain, and Panama and the head of the Union of South American Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing Obstacles to Venezuela's Future
    CSIS BRIEFS CSIS Analyzing Obstacles to Venezuela’s Future By Moises Rendon, Mark Schneider, & Jaime Vazquez NOVEMBER 2019 THE ISSUE Despite stiff sanctions, diplomatic isolation, and internal civil protests, Nicolas Maduro and his inner circle have resisted the pressures to negotiate an exit. Three internationally-sponsored dialogue processes and two efforts at mediated negotiations within the last five years have failed, with Maduro using the time to intensify his hold on power. Different factors are impeding a transition in Venezuela. This brief investigates challenges and opportunities to help support a transition toward democracy. It describes the possible role of a Track II diplomacy initiative to produce a feasible exit ramp for Maduro—essentially the achievement of significant progress outside of the formal negotiation process. The brief also discusses potential roles for chavistas in today’s struggle and for ‘day after’ challenges, the required elements for a transitional justice process, and the basic conditions necessary for holding free and fair elections to elect a new president. BACKGROUND undiminished support from Russia, China, and Cuba, have Amid numerous blackouts, fuel shortages impacting complicated efforts to achieve a political accord leading to a agriculture and food production, and inflation on pace democratic transition. to reach over 10 million percent by the end of 2019, Venezuela’s humanitarian, economic, and political crisis QUICK FACTS has forced more than 4 million citizens to flee their • According to the United Nations, Venezuela will homeland. That number could surge past 5 million by the have over 5.3 million refugees by the end of 2019. end of 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Departamento De Estado De Los Estados Unidos Declaración De Morgan Ortagus, La Portavoz 15 De Febrero De 2020 Los Estados Unid
    Departamento de Estado de los Estados Unidos Declaración de Morgan Ortagus, la Portavoz 15 de febrero de 2020 Los Estados Unidos condena la detención de un miembro de la familia del presidente interino Guaidó Los Estados Unidos condena enérgicamente la detención de Juan José Márquez, tío del presidente interino Juan Guaidó, y exige su liberación inmediata. Las absurdas acusaciones que se han formulado ejemplifican la creciente desesperación de Maduro y sus corruptos asociados. La fabricación de pruebas para justificar detenciones arbitrarias por motivos políticos es una herramienta habitual del antiguo régimen ilegítimo de Maduro. La hemos visto usarse contra Roberto Marrero, Juan Requesens, Gilber Caro e Ismael León, quienes constituyen una pequeña parte de los más de 350 presos políticos actualmente en Venezuela. Estos actos deplorables sólo retrasan la resolución de la trágica crisis en Venezuela que Maduro y sus colaboradores insisten en perpetuar. Diosdado Cabello, jefe de la Asamblea Constituyente ilegítima, argumenta que Márquez había introducido ilegalmente material explosivo a bordo de un vuelo internacional directo desde Portugal, después de haber pasado por el estricto control y los protocolos de seguridad del aeropuerto de Lisboa. La línea aérea, TAP Air Portugal, afirmó públicamente que “es imposible viajar con explosivos”. Estas acciones despreciables del antiguo régimen de Maduro —detener a civiles inocentes e inventar falsas acusaciones— lamentablemente son típicas. En lugar de acatar el Estado de derecho, Maduro y sus secuaces ejercen prácticas mafiosas e intimidan a la oposición atacando a sus familiares. En 2019, se notificaron 2.219 detenciones arbitrarias en Venezuela, y más de 15.000 entre 2014 y 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption and Crisis in Venezuela: Asset Repatriation for Humanitarian Relief
    CORRUPTION AND CRISIS IN VENEZUELA: ASSET REPATRIATION FOR HUMANITARIAN RELIEF Policy Options and Considerations A Policy Brief from the Inter-American Dialogue’s Peter D. Bell Rule of Law Program SEPTEMBER 2020 © 2020, Inter-American Dialogue. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - No Derivatives License. To view this license, visit (www. creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0). For re-use or distribution, please include this copyright notice. First Edition. Printed in Washington, DC. Cover photo: UNICEF/2018/Moreno / Flickr / CC BY 2.0 Layout: Catharine Christie / Inter-American Dialogue REPORT | SEPTEMBER 2020 CORRUPTION AND CRISIS IN VENEZUELA: ASSET REPATRIATION FOR HUMANITARIAN RELIEF Policy Options and Considerations A Policy Brief from the Inter-American Dialogue’s Peter D. Bell Rule of Law Program SEPTEMBER 2020 Corruption and Crisis in Venezuela: Asset Repatriation for Humanitarian Relief 3 Foreword The Inter-American Dialogue is pleased to present Corruption and Crisis in Venezuela: Asset Repatriation for Humanitarian Relief. This groundbreaking report is the culmination of over a year of research by the Dialogue’s Peter D. Bell Rule of Law Program. Against the backdrop of the ongoing institutional breakdown and humanitarian emergency in Venezuela, the report analyzes one of the salient features of contemporary Venezuela—industrial scale corruption—and presents detailed proposals for repatriating potentially billions of dollars of stolen assets for the benefit of the Venezuelan people. The policy options and recommendations offered in the report are based on careful legal analysis, comparative case studies, and a detailed grasp of the complexity of the political situation in Venezuela and the intricacies of US policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Irregularities in the Venezuelan Elections During
    Electoral Irregularities A Typology Based on Venezuela under Chavismo Draft February 6, 2018 Javier Corrales1 Department of Political Science Amherst College [email protected] This is a draft document. Please help improve this document by reporting any errors and omissions to [email protected]. 1 I am grateful to Alejandro Sucre, Federico Sucre, and Franz von Bergen for their research assistance. 1 Electoral Irregularities: A Typology based on Venezuela under Chavismo Venezuela’s Chavista period (1999-present) has often been praised for its frequent electoral activity. But it has also been characterized by two, less praiseworthy features: irregularities and biased electoral reforms. These features have worsened over time. To date, the total number of irregularities is 117. From the very beginning, almost every electoral process has featured at least one major irregularity or system biases in favor of the incumbent party. These irregularities consist of practices, rules, and even laws that depart from either the spirit or the letter of the Constitution or from international standards for conducting “free and fair” elections. This paper provides a typology of electoral irregularities in Venezuela in the Chavista era, 1999-present. The full list appears in the Appendix. Irregularities are classified according to three characteristics: timing, type, and effect. Regarding timing, the evidence shows that electoral irregularities occurred since the start of the Chavista era (referendum on whether to conduct a constituent assembly, 1999) and expanded over overtime during the entire Hugo Chávez administration (1999-2013). They have become ubiquitous now under Nicolás Maduro (2013- present). Regarding type, each irregularity is classified according to the following categories: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Venezuela After Chavez
    Edited by Veronica Zubillaga George Ciccariello-Maher Rebecca Hanson Boris Muñoz Robert Samet Naomi Schiller David Smilde Alejandro Velasco Veronica Zubillaga April 30th, 2014 1 Introduction Venezuela after Chávez: Challenges of Democracy, Security and Governance April 30, 2014 Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies Watson Institute for International Studies Brown University The death of President Hugo Chávez on March 2013 has raised pressing questions about the future of Venezuela and the continuity of Chávez’s Bolivarian project. Nicolás Maduro, Chávez’s hand-picked successor, won elections in April 2013 with a very narrow electoral victory that aroused serious suspicion of fraud amidst the opposition and intense tensions among Venezuelans. Nine months later, in February 2014, Venezuelans experienced a burst of massive students protests in different states, which immediately spread to middle-classes neighborhoods of the emboldened opposition. While we were organizing the Venezuela conference at Brown, in Caracas some middle-class neighborhoods were taken and blocked by “vecinos” (neighbors); students kept taking to the streets protesting while excessively repressive and militarized police responses reheated the students’ rage. The protest’s focused on a vast range of claims: from freedom of speech, citizen security, food shortages; inflation; freedom for those imprisoned for political motives since the beginning of the protests; government repression, up to Maduro’s immediate resignation. The landscape resembled a war zone in one part of the city yet was amazingly calm in other parts. Social polarization was evident and finding out the reasons why people in barrios were not protesting is one of the questions posed here.
    [Show full text]