DOCSLIB.ORG

Belarus Context Note

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BELARUS CONTEXT NOTE BELARUS CONTEXT NOTE BELARUS CONTEXT CONTEXT NOTE WRITTEN BY: Damien Helly EDITED BY: Yudhishthir Raj Isar GRAPHICS & LAY OUT BY: Guillemette Madinier DATE OF PUBLICATION: 10 September 2014 The current political situation and the time constraints in place for the Preparatory Action's enquiry have not allowed for a proper consultation process to be undertaken in Belarus. This note is the result of desk research and online consultation with a limited number of stakeholders. It therefore provides only a single snapshot at the given moment. It is not a full-fledged analysis of the cultural relations between Europe and Belarus. The content of this report does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed therein lies entirely with the author(s). © 2013-2014 Preparatory Action ‘Culture in the EU's External Relations’ CONTEXT NOTE BELARUS | 1 preparatory action CULTURE in EU EXTERNAL RELATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................... 2 OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................................... 3 THE CULTURAL POLICY LANDSCAPE AND RELATIONS WITH THE EU ................................................... 4 PERCEPTIONS AND EXPECTATIONS .................................................................................................. 7 ANNEX ............................................................................................................................................ 9 EU-Belarus cultural cooperation activities run by the Commission Headquarters ....................... 9 CONTEXT NOTE BELARUS | 2 preparatory action CULTURE in EU EXTERNAL RELATIONS OVERVIEW Under the authoritarian regime in place since the 1990s, citizens of Belarus have had limited opportunities to engage culturally with Europe, the continent to which their country historically, geographically and culturally belongs. Human rights violations, despite the short-lived 2008-2010 liberalisation, have cast a shadow on relations with the EU (which applies sanctions on the President and other political figures) and other international organisations like the OSCE. Cultural relations, in such a context, have become highly politicised, while the country’s economic, financial and security reliance on Russia has brought Belarus even closer to its Eastern neighbour. In the cultural field, the first phase of independence coincided with some revival of the national culture. The authorities have since supported or encouraged cultural practices aligned with Russian ones. The cultural landscape of Belarus is fragmented and difficult to identify due to limited transparency, limited freedom of expression, and political repression. The Ukrainian crisis has contributed to maintaining tensions in the region, making prospects of enhanced cultural relations even more unpredictable. CONTEXT NOTE BELARUS | 3 preparatory action CULTURE in EU EXTERNAL RELATIONS THE CULTURAL POLICY LANDSCAPE AND RELATIONS WITH THE EU Although Belarus does not have an official strategy for external cultural relations, this policy area is addressed in a number of documents such as, to name but a few, the government programmes on culture and on the development of tourism for 2011-2015, laws on culture (1991), heritage (2006), museums (2005), cinemas (2004) or workers and unions in the creative sector (1999). The promotion of both cultural heritage and local cultural development has become an official priority.1 Since 1992, the country has signed 33 international agreements on culture with EU Member States, Russia, China, India, Iran, South Africa and Turkey.2 Belarus has approved the UNESCO Conventions on the protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions (2005) and on intangible cultural heritage (2003).3 As far as state policies are concerned, priority is given to immediate neighbours (Russia and close EU Member States like Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine), former Soviet Republics (Azerbaijan), but also to some extent Germany, Italy and France.4 Cultural production in Russian mostly targets Russia, Poland and Lithuania. State policies focus on three clusters of objectives: cultural diplomacy for the promotion of Belarus' culture internationally; the enhancement of Belarusian national identity inside the country and within its neighbourhood (Russia, Ukraine and Poland); and the enrichment of citizens’ cultural life.5 These objectives contrast with the fact that most of the staff in ministries dealing with culture has very little experience of working and studying abroad.6 Local authorities have some competences in dealing with culture in external relations, provided they ensure the unity of state policies. One example of external cultural relations managed at local level is the organisation in 2013 of the cultural days of the Kaliningrad oblast (an administrative territorial entity of Russia) in the region of Brest.7 External cultural relations are usually led by the Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In the field of research, including on culture in external relations, the government 1 'Le trésor culturel du Bélarus’, Ambassade de la République du Belarus en France. Online. Available at: http://france.mfa.gov.by/fr/belarus/culture/. 2 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Belarus website: http://www.mfa.gov.by/. 3 Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, Paris, 20 October 2005, UNESCO. Online. Available at: http://www.unesco.org/eri/la/convention.asp?order=alpha&language=E&KO=31038; and Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, Paris, 17 October 2003, UNESCO. Online. Available at: http://www.unesco.org/eri/la/convention.asp?order=alpha&language=E&KO=17116. The term ‘approval’ means that the state accepts to be bound by the convention. The instrument of approval or acceptance has the same effects as the ratification. See: https://treaties.un.org/pages/Overview.aspx?path=overview/glossary/page1_en.xml&clang=_en. 4 Information gathered from the website of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. Accessed on 27 May 2013. 5 Responses to the Preparatory Action questionnaire by the Ministry of Culture, December 2013. 6 Data collected by a cultural expert in Belarus interviewed by Skype, July 2014. 7 Example given by the Ministry of Culture in the questionnaire: ‘Brest Regional Executive Committee’. Online. Available at: http://brest-region.gov.by/index.php/en/. CONTEXT NOTE BELARUS | 4 preparatory action CULTURE in EU EXTERNAL RELATIONS works with a state-funded research institute, the Belarus Culture Institute.8 The President of the Republic may also be personally involved in some external cultural relations initiatives. For instance, the President of Belarus awarded a national prize for cinema to the film director Emir Kusturica in 2010. A number of internationalised cultural events take place in Belarus in the field of the performing arts. The first Independent International Festival of Experimental Theatres was launched in 2011 and organised by the ROND Theatre, the Belarusian State Academy of Arts, the Centre of Belarusian Drama and Direction, and the concert agency Bopromo in cooperation with the Bonn municipality. Cinema festivals such as Niepakalianava and Listapad also cooperate with European partners.9 The Magnificat International Catholic Festival of Christian Films and TV Documentaries has been held in Belarus since the early 2000s by the Catholic Church of Belarus.10 Experts underline that there are three types of cultural organisations in Belarus: cooperating, compromising and non-cooperating with state authorities.11 The cultural sector debates the country’s cultural orientation and the European-ness of society. However, ‘people who speak Belarusian are invariably treated as an opposition’.12 The ‘Let us be Belarusians/Budzma’ campaign focuses on the recognition of the national/cultural identity of Belarusian. It works with Belarusian Diaspora abroad and with Belarusians in the country.13 Batskauschyna (the World Association of Belarusians) also promotes culture as a way to improve day-to-day life while referring to the roots of Belarusian identity. Belarus is part of the Culture programme of the Eastern Partnership of the EU. It also has cooperation agreements with a number of EU Member States, namely: Latvia, Germany, Italy, France and Bulgaria.14 The EU has increased its assistance to Belarusian civil society in the last few years through a variety of programmes (EIDHR, Media). However, the country is not part of several international culture and education frameworks, such as the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), the EU Bologna Process or the European Parliament and Council of Europe’s criteria of evaluation of the quality of education.15 The pariah status of Belarus makes it difficult for the EU and European organisations to engage with counterparts there. Amongst EU Member States, Poland, Lithuania and Germany are probably the most active in fostering cultural relations with Belarus via people-to-people contacts 8 The Institute of Culture of Belarus website: http://inbelkult.by/en/. 9 Lavon Barshcheuski, L., et al., A Report on the Condition of NGOs and Independent Culture in Belarus, Kultura Enter, 2011. 10 Magnificat. International Catholic Festival of Christian Documentary
Recommended publications
  • Achievements and Difficulties in Bilateral Cooperation (1992–2017)

    Achievements and Difficulties in Bilateral Cooperation (1992–2017)

    UDC 327(476:474.5)"1992/2017" BELARus – LATvIA: AchIEvEmEnTs AnD DIffIcuLTIEs In BILATERAL cOOpERATIOn (1992–2017) V. G. ShADurski a aBelarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus The present article is devoted to the analysis of the Belarusian-Latvian relations during the period after the two countries gained independence. The author came to the conclusion that the main obstacle to expanding bilateral cooperation is the opposite of geopolitical aspirations of Minsk and Riga and, as a consequence, a different attitude of the neighbouring count- ries to the problem of human rights and historical policy. It is unlikely that the existing disagreements can be eliminated in the coming years. However, such advantages as the geographic proximity of the two countries, the cultural and histori­ cal proximity of the Belarusians and Latvians are a favourable factor for establishing effective interaction in the economic sphere, contacts at the level of regions and cities. A great capacity for cooperation exists in the Belarusian-Latvian border area. The article contains an attempt to define “points of growth” in bilateral relations, as well as to identify problems that can be eliminated without serious financial costs. Key words: Belarusian-Latvian relations; Belarusian and Latvian foreign policy; diaspora; Euroregions; twin cities; small border movement. образец цитирования: For citation: Шадурский В. Г. Беларусь – Латвия: достижения и про­ Shadurski V. G. Belarus – Latvia: achievements and difficul­ блемы двустороннего сотрудничества (1992–2017) // ties in bilateral cooperation (1992–2017). J. Belarus. State Журн. Белорус. гос. ун-та. Междунар. отношения. 2017. Univ. Int. Relat. 2017. No. 2. P. 3–12.
  • Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past: a Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region

    Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past: a Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region

    CBEES State of the Region Report 2020 Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region Published with support from the Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies (Östersjstiftelsen) Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region December 2020 Publisher Centre for Baltic and East European Studies, CBEES, Sdertrn University © CBEES, Sdertrn University and the authors Editor Ninna Mrner Editorial Board Joakim Ekman, Florence Frhlig, David Gaunt, Tora Lane, Per Anders Rudling, Irina Sandomirskaja Layout Lena Fredriksson, Serpentin Media Proofreading Bridget Schaefer, Semantix Print Elanders Sverige AB ISBN 978-91-85139-12-5 4 Contents 7 Preface. A New Annual CBEES Publication, Ulla Manns and Joakim Ekman 9 Introduction. Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past, David Gaunt and Tora Lane 15 Background. Eastern and Central Europe as a Region of Memory. Some Common Traits, Barbara Trnquist-Plewa ESSAYS 23 Victimhood and Building Identities on Past Suffering, Florence Frhlig 29 Image, Afterimage, Counter-Image: Communist Visuality without Communism, Irina Sandomirskaja 37 The Toxic Memory Politics in the Post-Soviet Caucasus, Thomas de Waal 45 The Flag Revolution. Understanding the Political Symbols of Belarus, Andrej Kotljarchuk 55 Institutes of Trauma Re-production in a Borderland: Poland, Ukraine, and Lithuania, Per Anders Rudling COUNTRY BY COUNTRY 69 Germany. The Multi-Level Governance of Memory as a Policy Field, Jenny Wstenberg 80 Lithuania. Fractured and Contested Memory Regimes, Violeta Davoliūtė 87 Belarus. The Politics of Memory in Belarus: Narratives and Institutions, Aliaksei Lastouski 94 Ukraine. Memory Nodes Loaded with Potential to Mobilize People, Yuliya Yurchuk 106 Czech Republic.
  • Specialties of Academic Programs of the Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts

    Specialties of Academic Programs of the Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts

    SPECIALTIES OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS OF THE BELARUSIAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF CULTURE AND ARTS Reference book MINSK BSUCA 2013 CONTENTS Specialties of the first stage of higher education FACULTY OF CULTUROLOGY AND SOCIOCULTURAL ACTIVITY Specialty 1-21 04 01 Culturology (according to directions) Specialization 1-21 04 01-01 01 Theory and History of Culture …………………….6 Specialization 1-21 04 01-02 01 Management in Social and Cultural Area …………7 Specialization 1-21 04 01-02 02 Management of International Cultural Relations ….8 Specialization1-21 04 01-02 03 Advertising Management and Public Relations ……9 Specialization1-21 04 01-02 04 Information Systems in Culture …………………..10 Specialty 1-23 01 14 Sociocultural Activity (according to directions) Specialization 1-23 01 14 01 Organization and Methodology of Sociocultural Activity in Leisure and Recreation Establishments, 1-23 01 14 03 Organization and Methodology of Sociocultural Activity at Health Resort and Tourist and sport Establishments ………………………………………………………………………11 Specialty 1-21 04 02 Art Criticism (according to directions) Specialization 1-21 04 02-05 01 Comparative Art Criticism ……………………….12 FACULTY OF INFORMATION AND DOCUMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1-23 01 11 Library Science and Bibliography (according to directions) Specialization 23 01 11-01 01 Library Marketing …………………………………..13 Specialization 1-23 01 11-01 03 Cultural and Leisure Activity …………………….14 Specialization 1-23 01 11-01 04 Library Service for Children and Youth …………15 Specialization 1-23 01 11-01 05 Library Science and Bibliography
  • Two à Migrã Journals: Kultura (From a Hungarian

    Two à Migrã Journals: Kultura (From a Hungarian

    GEORGE G�M�RI (Cambridge, England., U.K.) TWO �MIGR� JOURNALS: KULTURA (FROM A HUNGARIAN) AND IRODALMI UJS�G (FROM A POLISH) POINT OF VIEW The Polish journal Kultura was started in the West in 1947 and still ex- ists, while the Hungarian Iroda!mi ujsig (Literary gazette) was founded in different circumstances (in Communist-ruled Hungary) back in 1950. It was relaunched in the West in 1957 and existed until 1989. When comparing these two publications, one has to discuss first of all their respective cultur- al backgrounds. Though there is much that is common to Polish and Hun- garian history, from shared kings to similar social structures, they have rather different traditions of emigration. Poland ceased to exist as a sover- eign state at the end of the eighteenth century, so her emigres, struggling, writing and on more than one occasion fighting for the restoration of an in- dependent Poland played an indispensible role - indeed, a much greater role than their numbers warranted. The grouping known as the Great Emi- gration ( NVielka Emigracja), formed after the failure of the 1830-31 uprising and struggle for independence, had Paris as its nerve centre. Without writ- ers in exile like Mickiewicz, Slowacki and Norwid it would be difficult to imag- ine modern Polish literature in its present form. During the Second World War many Poles found themselves in the West, and when the majority of them decided to stay after 1945, changing their status from refugees to emigres, there was already a continuous tradition they could look back on.
  • IN SEARCH of NEW OPPORTUNITIES Circular Migration Between Belarus and Poland, Slovakia and the Czech Republic – State of Play and Prospects for Cooperation

    IN SEARCH of NEW OPPORTUNITIES Circular Migration Between Belarus and Poland, Slovakia and the Czech Republic – State of Play and Prospects for Cooperation

    IN SEARCH OF NEW OPPORTUNITIES Circular migration between Belarus and Poland, Slovakia and the Czech Republic – state of play and prospects for cooperation Edited by Agnieszka Kulesa and Piotr Kaźmierkiewicz With contributions from Ivan Lichner, Šárka Prát, Marek Radvanský and Andrei Yeliseyeu © CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research, Warsaw 2021 Graphic design: Differ Designs Tomasz Mostowski ISBN: 978-83-7178-705-8 (print), 978-83-7178-706-5 (online) Publisher CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research Al. Jana Pawła II 61/212 01-031 Warsaw Poland tel. +48 222 062 900 [email protected] www.case-research.eu This publication was developed in the frame of the project “CIRCMIGR: Improving circular migration between Belarus and Poland, Slovakia and Czechia” (Standard Grant Agreement no. 21930098) co-fi- nanced by the Governments of Czechia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia through Visegrad Grants from International Visegrad Fund. The mission of the fund is to advance ideas for sustainable regional cooperation in Central Europe. Partners IN SEARCH OF NEW OPPORTUNITIES Circular migration between Belarus and Poland, Slovakia and the Czech Republic – state of play and prospects for cooperation Edited by Agnieszka Kulesa and Piotr Kaźmierkiewicz With contributions from Ivan Lichner, Šárka Prát, Marek Radvanský and Andrei Yeliseyeu CASE CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research is an independent, non-profit research institute founded on the idea that research-based policy-making is vital for the economic welfare of societies. Established in Warsaw in 1991, CASE today is recognized as the top think tank in Central and Eastern Europe and is one of the most highly regarded think tanks internationally.
  • Religion and Denominations in the Republic of Belarus

    Religion and Denominations in the Republic of Belarus

    November 2011 Religion and denominations in the Republic of Belarus Multi-confessional structure of the Belarusian society has been forming over more than a thousand year history of the nation; it became an important factor that had a great influence on the formation of culture, mentality and state traditions of the present-day Belarus. The experience of our state, where more than 25 different denominations and religious movements organically coexist, is unique. The Orthodox Church has been of great 58.9 per cent of Belarusians consider importance on the Belarusian lands themselves believers. 82 per cent of since the adoption of Christianity in them are Orthodox, 12 per cent are the 10th century and today still attracts Roman Catholic and 6 per cent are a significant number of representatives of other believers. Four 58,9 % denominations. centuries later the of Belarusians are Catholic Church believers. 82 % of them are In the 16th came to the orthodox, 12 % are catholics, century the Grand Duchy E u r o p e a n of Lithuania that 6% represent other Reformation was created on the denominations resulted in the basis of the Belarusian arrival of Protestant territory. Since that time Catholicism movements, among which Lutheran made a great contribution to the and Calvinist ideas became widespread culture of Belarus and its history. on the territory of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. Even earlier, at the end of Protestant religious organizations the 14th -15th centuries, Muslims and are represented by 1005 religious Jews settled in Belarus. A large number communities, 21 associations, of religious denominations appeared 22 missions and 5 religious during the 20th century.
  • There Is Another Quite Interesting and Well-Reasoned Theory of the Origin Of

    There Is Another Quite Interesting and Well-Reasoned Theory of the Origin Of

    NATION-BUILDING IN BELARUS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY MAIYA FAMICH IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY FEBRUARY 2012 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Meliha Benli Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Ayşe Saktanber Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşegül Aydıngün Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı (METU, ADM) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşegul Aydıngün (METU, SOC) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Erdoğan Yıldırım (METU, SOC) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Maiya Famich Signature : iii ABSTRACT NATION-BUILDING IN BELARUS Famich, Maiya M. Sc., Department of Sociology Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşegül Aydıngün February 2012, 134 pages The purpose of this thesis is to examine the process of nation-building in the Republic of Belarus from 1991 till the present time. The focus is made on two main projects of nation-building presented by the official authorities and the political opposition.
  • Culture and Change in Belarus

    Culture and Change in Belarus

    East European Reflection Group (EE RG) Identifying Cultural Actors of Change in Belarus, Ukraine and Moldova Culture and Change in Belarus Report prepared by Yael Ohana, Rapporteur Generale Bratislava, August 2007 Culture and Change in Belarus “Life begins for the counter-culture in Belarus after regime change”. Anonymous, at the consultation meeting in Kiev, Ukraine, June 14 2007. Introduction1 Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine have recently become direct neighbours of the European Union. Both Moldova and Ukraine have also become closer partners of the European Union through the European Neighbourhood Policy. Neighbourhood usually refers to people next-door, people we know, or could easily get to know. It implies interest, curiosity and solidarity in the other living close by. For the moment, the European Union’s “neighbourhood” is something of an abstract notion, lacking in substance. In order to avoid ending up “lost in translation”, it is necessary to question and some of the basic premises on which cultural and other forms of European cooperation are posited. In an effort to create constructive dialogue with this little known neighbourhood, the European Cultural Foundation (ECF) and the German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) are currently preparing a three- year partnership to support cultural agents of change in Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine. In the broad sense, this programme is to work with, and provide assistance to, initiatives and institutions that employ creative, artistic and cultural means to contribute to the process of constructive change in each of the three countries. ECF and GMF have begun a process of reflection in order to understand the extent to which the culture sphere in each of the three countries under consideration can support change, defined here as processes and dynamics contributing to democratisation, Europeanisation and modernisation in the three countries concerned.
  • Belarusian Culture and Cuisine at Netcost Market

    Belarusian Culture and Cuisine at Netcost Market

    Belarusian Culture and Cuisine at NetCost Market NetCost Market World of Foods celebration continues! After successfully spotlighting Ukraine, Georgia, and Russia, we journey to the country of Belarus. For the first two weeks of February, NetCost Market stores will feature hot and cold Belarusian and regional cuisines freshly prepared daily from our chefs’ kitchens. We will honor the traditions and the culture of Belarus through traditional music, national foods, flags, souvenirs, and factual highlights posters. Enjoy our unique spotlight on Belarus and the continuation of our celebration of international foods. The Republic of Belarus is a landlocked country nestled between Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia. Its wild and rugged landscape is home to one of the largest populations of the once virtually extinct European Bison. Here at NetCost Market, we’re celebrating this astonishing country’s remarkable cuisine during ourBelarusian weeks weekly specials so you can enjoy some of the brilliant food this wild country has to offer. Draniki A Belarusian classic is draniki—a type of fried pancake made from grated potato and onion. These simple yet delicious crispy treats can be found at street food stalls around the country’s capital, Minsk, and are usually served alongside a large serving of tasty sour cream. Zhurek Zhurek dates back from the times when much of Belarus was part of the Commonwealth of Poland. For this reason, it’s also enjoyed over the border on the eastern side of Poland. It’s a type of sour bread soup that is made by fermenting flour, bread, garlic, and water in a jar, and then cooking it slowly for a long time.
  • The Ukrainian Weekly, 2020

    The Ukrainian Weekly, 2020

    INSIDE: l Ukraine’s geopolitical successes, Russia’s defeats – page 3 l Commentary: Markiv acquitted and freed – page 6 l Manor College holds drive-in graduation – page 14 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association Vol. LXXXVIII No. 45 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2020 $2.00 Constitutional Court abolishes Milan Appeal Court acquits Ukrainian soldier Ukraine’s anti-corruption system Markiv in 2014 killing of Italian journalist by Roman Tymotsko er political association and economic inte- gration with Europe. Significantly, the CCU’s KYIV – The Constitutional Court of decision could threaten lending from the Ukraine (CCU) on October 27 declared International Monetary Fund and could some provisions of the country’s anti-cor- lead to a temporary suspension of visa-free ruption legislation unconstitutional. The travel to the European Union. CCU was ruling on the submission of 48 On October 29, President Volodymyr national deputies from two parliamentary Zelenskyy convened an urgent closed-door factions, For the Future and the Opposition meeting of the National Security and Platform – For Life. Defense Council to determine the immedi- What the decision means is that elec- ate proper response to what he said are tronic declarations of civil servants’ income new threats to national security created by and property are abolished, the powers of the Constitutional Court’s decision. “It is the National Anti-Corruption Agency not only a matter of this decision but also, (known by its Ukrainian acronym as NAZK) in general, of the purposeful actions of cer- to inspect civil servants are abolished, judg- tain individuals to undermine the social ments of illicit enrichment are cancelled, contract in Ukraine and to create a threat to confiscation of corrupt assets is discontin- national security,” the president noted.
  • Slavic Diasporas of Southern Russia: Socio- Cultural And

    Slavic Diasporas of Southern Russia: Socio- Cultural And

    Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues Volume 20, Issue 3, 2017 SLAVIC DIASPORAS OF SOUTHERN RUSSIA: SOCIO- CULTURAL AND INTERNATIONAL FACTORS OF REPRODUCTION OF IDENTITY Andrei V Bedrik, Southern Federal University Anton V Serikov, Southern Federal University Anatoly V Lubsky, Southern Federal University ABSTRACT The present study analyses the reproduction of the Slavic diaspora communities in the two southern Russian regions of Rostov Region and Krasnodar Territory with the prevailing Russian population in the ethno demographic structure of the society. The state of socio-cultural reproduction of the ethnic identity of the Slavic diaspora groups in the region (Ukrainians, Byelorussians, Poles and Bulgarians) is determined by the nature of development of political processes in the post-Soviet environment and in the states of Eastern Europe. The worsening of the Russian-Ukrainian and Russian-Polish relations aggravates a stable assimilation trend in the processes of reproduction of the identity of representatives of the Ukrainian and Polish ethnic groups in the Southern Russia. This trend is accompanied by the spreading of new types of ethnic phobias in the region (for example, Ukrainophobia), which provokes the diaspora’s segmentation based on the loyalty of its representatives to the state of citizenship or the state of historical origin neutralizing the efforts of state authorities to preserve the existing palette of ethnic diversity in the region. The migration factor does not have a significant impact on the state of demographic reproduction of the Slavic diaspora groups in the region, but acts as an additional source of tension in the system of interethnic communications of the regional society.
  • Revanchist Russia? Russian Perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian Sovereignty, 1990-2008

    Revanchist Russia? Russian Perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian Sovereignty, 1990-2008

    1 Revanchist Russia? Russian Perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian Sovereignty, 1990-2008 Rasmus Nilsson UCL For the degree of PhD 2 I, Rasmus Nilsson, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 3 Abstract The theme of this thesis concerns post-Soviet Russian foreign policy perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty between 1990 and 2008. In the thesis I argue that Russian perceptions became increasingly revanchist in nature during this period, and that we may distinguish between two different types of revanchism, the consequences of which for Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty are quite different. I argue that all Russian perceptions of international affairs are constituted by perceptions of Russia. Thus, perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty may be divided into three categories, or paradigms, each of which centres on a specific concept that legitimises the existence of Russia, and determines how Belarus and Ukraine are viewed. The three central concepts are the concepts of Law, Power, and Nation, respectively. In the introduction, I outline these paradigms, both in abstract terms and in relation to Russian foreign policy in general, as well as Russian foreign policy towards Belarus and Ukraine. Subsequently, I present my methodology and my literature review, together with a discussion of the theoretical assumptions, which provide the foundation for my argument. Then, I briefly outline Russian foreign policy making during the period relevant for my thesis, before the four main chapters of my thesis outline in roughly chronological fashion how the relative significance of the three paradigms has changed over time.