There Is Another Quite Interesting and Well-Reasoned Theory of the Origin Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

There Is Another Quite Interesting and Well-Reasoned Theory of the Origin Of NATION-BUILDING IN BELARUS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY MAIYA FAMICH IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY FEBRUARY 2012 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Meliha Benli Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Ayşe Saktanber Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşegül Aydıngün Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı (METU, ADM) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşegul Aydıngün (METU, SOC) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Erdoğan Yıldırım (METU, SOC) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Maiya Famich Signature : iii ABSTRACT NATION-BUILDING IN BELARUS Famich, Maiya M. Sc., Department of Sociology Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşegül Aydıngün February 2012, 134 pages The purpose of this thesis is to examine the process of nation-building in the Republic of Belarus from 1991 till the present time. The focus is made on two main projects of nation-building presented by the official authorities and the political opposition. The main concern of this thesis is to make a comparative analysis of these two projects of Belarussian national identity. Also, the thesis examines the views of the official authorities and the political opposition on the history of Belarus, which is used as a tool of national identity construction in their projects of nation- building. Concepts of ethnic and civic nationalisms are discussed aiming at understanding the nature of nationalism in Belarus together with different theoretical approaches to ethnicity. Keywords: Belarus, nation-building, nationalism, ethnicity iv ÖZ BELARUS’TA ULUS İNŞASI Famich, Maiya M. Sc., Sosyoloji Bölümü Tez Danışmanı: Doç. Dr. Ayşegül Aydıngün Şubat 2012, 134 sayfa Bu tezin amacı Belarus Cumhuriyeti’nde 1991’den günümüze süregelen ulus inşası sürecini incelemektir. Hükümet ve siyasi muhalefet tarafından ortaya konan iki farklı ulus inşa projesine odaklanılmıştır. Bu tezde söz konusu iki ulusal kimlik inşa projesini karşılaştırılmalı olarak incelenmektedir. Ayrıca tezde, hükümet ve siyasi muhalefet tarafından ulus inşa projelerinin temel bir unsuru olarak kullanılan Belarus tarihi yazımı üzerinde yoğunlaşılmıştır. Etnik ve sivik milliyetcilik kavramları Belarus milliyetciliğinin niteliğini anlamak amacıyla tartışılmış, etnisiteye farklı kuramsal yaklaşımlar da incelenmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belarus, ulus inşası, milliyetcilik, etnisite v To my parents vi ACKNOWLEGEMENTS Foremost, I wish to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor Assoc. Prof. Ayşegül Aydıngün for her guidance that helped me all the time throughout the research. This thesis would not be possible without her continuous support, patience and motivation. I am grateful to Assoc. Prof. Pınar Akçalı for her stimulating comments and valuable suggestions. I am also grateful to Assoc. Prof. Erdoğan Yıldırım, for his comments and advice. I would also like to express my deepest gratitude and appreciation to the academic staff of the Department of Sociology of Belarussian State University for giving me an indispensable academic background that provided me with the possibility to make this research. I would like to thank to my family, especially my mother and father, for their constant support for my academic success. Also many thanks go to my friends for their encouragement and great support that helped me to overcome the difficulties throughout this research: H. Gökçe, V. Chursinova, A. Gamolko, I. Poddubnaya. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS PLAGIARISM .............................................................................................................iii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ iv ÖZ ................................................................................................................................. v DEDICATION ............................................................................................................ vi ACKNOLEGEMENTS .............................................................................................. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS ..........................................................................................viii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................... x CHAPTER .................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introducing the study .................................................................................... 1 1.2 Research problem ....................................................................................... 17 1.3 Methodology .............................................................................................. 17 1.4 Organization of the Chapters ...................................................................... 18 2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ....................................................................... 20 2.1 Soviet approach to ethnos and ethnic communities ............................................. 21 2.2. Civic nationalism and ethnic nationalism .................................................. 25 2.3 Modernity and nationalism ................................................................................... 31 2.4 Ethnosymbolism ................................................................................................... 40 2.5. Nationalism in East Europe after the collapse of the USSR ............................... 42 3. OFFICIAL AND ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO BELARUSSIAN NATIONAL IDENTITY ............................................................................................ 47 3.1. The official perspective .............................................................................. 48 3.2 The alternative approaches to Belarussian national identity ...................... 59 3.2.1 The approaches of political opposition ............................................................. 60 3.2.1.1 ‘European Belarus’ ......................................................................................... 60 3.2.1.2 ‘Belarus for itself’........................................................................................... 61 3.2.2 The approaches of independent intellectuals ..................................................... 64 viii 3.2.2.1 Post-Freudianism and the historical memory approach to Belarussian national identity ........................................................................................................................ 65 3.2.2.2 Post-colonial approach to Belarussian national identity ................................ 69 3.2.2.3 Belarus as ‘Borderland’ .................................................................................. 72 3.2.2.4 The concept of ‘creolity’ as a characteristic of Belarussian national identity 74 4. RECONSTRUCTION OF THE NATIONAL HISTORY OF BELARUS AS AN IMPORTANT TOOL IN THE NATION-BUILDING PROCESS ............................ 78 4.1 Ethnic origin of Belarussians ............................................................................... 79 4.2 First state on the territory of Belarus .................................................................... 81 4.3 Grand Duchy of Lithuania .................................................................................... 84 4.4 The ‘Polish’ period (1385-1795) .......................................................................... 87 4.5 The ‘Russian’ period ............................................................................................ 97 4.6 Belarus after the collapse of Russian Empire ..................................................... 106 4.7 Belarus in the USSR ........................................................................................... 108 5. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................. 119 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 129 APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………..135 A. TEZ FOTOKOPİSİ İZİN FORMU……………………......................................135 ix LIST OF FIGURES FIGURES Figure 4.1 ‘Oppositional’ flag and national emblem ‘ Pagonya ’…………………..116 Figure 4.2 Official flag of the Republic of Belarus………………………………..117 Figure 4.3 Official flag of Belarussian Soviet Socialistic Republic….....................117 x CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION At the very beginning God was distributing the lands of the Earth to the nations. Belarussians came to Him and asked for their piece of land. God liked Belarussians very much and told them: “You are so nice people, so I will give you a beautiful piece of land, with forests full of animals, rivers and lakes full of fish, and a rich soil, which will give you
Recommended publications
  • Belarus – the Unfulfilled Phenomena: the Prospects of Social Mobilization
    14 Jovita Pranevičiūtė* Institute of International Relations and Political Science, University of Vilnius Belarus – the Unfulfilled Phenomena: The Prospects of Social Mobilization For more than ten years Belarus has be under authoritarian rule and it has been difficult to explain this phenomenon. The rhetoric of the Belarusian elites – governing and oppositional – is analyzed as the main tool of the struggle to mobilize society for collec- tive action in the political fight. The rhetoric of the ruling elite, and also the opposition, is analyzed in three dimensions: how competing elites are talking about the glorious past; the degraded present; and the utopian future. Through collective action, the nation will reverse the conditions that have caused its present degradation and recover its original harmonious essence. The main aim of this study is to demonstrate that in short - and perhaps even in the medium-run - the Belarusian president Alexander Lukahenko will remain in power due to the successful employment of the trinomial rhetorical structure. The conclusions can be shocking meaning that the ruling elite has been able to persuade society that the glorious past has been realized in the times of Soviet Union and at the moment Belarus is living in the conditions of utopian future, i.e. future is a reality, nonetheless the short period of the opposition ruin rule in the nineties and negative actions of opposition in nowadays. While the utopian reality is based at least on the ideas of economical survival and believes that all the aims of society have been reached already, the opposition has no chance to mobilize a critical part of society to ensure the support to its own ideas and to get in to power.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Core Document Forming Part of the Reports of States Parties
    United Nations HRI/CORE/BLR/2011 International Human Rights Distr.: General 22 November 2012 Instruments English Original: Russian Common core document forming part of the reports of States parties Belarus* [15 December 2011] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not formally edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.12-48099 (E) 211212 040113 HRI/CORE/BLR/2011 Contents Paragraphs Page I. General information about the Republic of Belarus................................................ 1–56 3 A. Geographical situation.................................................................................... 1–5 3 B. Constitutional, political and legal structure of the State ................................. 6–16 3 C. Economic, social and cultural characteristics................................................. 17–45 4 D. Demographic situation.................................................................................... 46–56 7 II. General framework for the protection and promotion of human rights .................. 57–244 8 A. Acceptance of international human rights norms ........................................... 57–61 8 B. Legal framework for the protection of human rights at the national level...... 62–75 9 C. Framework within which human rights are promoted at the national level.... 76–236 11 1. The right to a decent standard of living.................................................. 76–83 11 2. The right
    [Show full text]
  • Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past: a Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region
    CBEES State of the Region Report 2020 Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region Published with support from the Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies (Östersjstiftelsen) Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region December 2020 Publisher Centre for Baltic and East European Studies, CBEES, Sdertrn University © CBEES, Sdertrn University and the authors Editor Ninna Mrner Editorial Board Joakim Ekman, Florence Frhlig, David Gaunt, Tora Lane, Per Anders Rudling, Irina Sandomirskaja Layout Lena Fredriksson, Serpentin Media Proofreading Bridget Schaefer, Semantix Print Elanders Sverige AB ISBN 978-91-85139-12-5 4 Contents 7 Preface. A New Annual CBEES Publication, Ulla Manns and Joakim Ekman 9 Introduction. Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past, David Gaunt and Tora Lane 15 Background. Eastern and Central Europe as a Region of Memory. Some Common Traits, Barbara Trnquist-Plewa ESSAYS 23 Victimhood and Building Identities on Past Suffering, Florence Frhlig 29 Image, Afterimage, Counter-Image: Communist Visuality without Communism, Irina Sandomirskaja 37 The Toxic Memory Politics in the Post-Soviet Caucasus, Thomas de Waal 45 The Flag Revolution. Understanding the Political Symbols of Belarus, Andrej Kotljarchuk 55 Institutes of Trauma Re-production in a Borderland: Poland, Ukraine, and Lithuania, Per Anders Rudling COUNTRY BY COUNTRY 69 Germany. The Multi-Level Governance of Memory as a Policy Field, Jenny Wstenberg 80 Lithuania. Fractured and Contested Memory Regimes, Violeta Davoliūtė 87 Belarus. The Politics of Memory in Belarus: Narratives and Institutions, Aliaksei Lastouski 94 Ukraine. Memory Nodes Loaded with Potential to Mobilize People, Yuliya Yurchuk 106 Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialties of Academic Programs of the Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts
    SPECIALTIES OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS OF THE BELARUSIAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF CULTURE AND ARTS Reference book MINSK BSUCA 2013 CONTENTS Specialties of the first stage of higher education FACULTY OF CULTUROLOGY AND SOCIOCULTURAL ACTIVITY Specialty 1-21 04 01 Culturology (according to directions) Specialization 1-21 04 01-01 01 Theory and History of Culture …………………….6 Specialization 1-21 04 01-02 01 Management in Social and Cultural Area …………7 Specialization 1-21 04 01-02 02 Management of International Cultural Relations ….8 Specialization1-21 04 01-02 03 Advertising Management and Public Relations ……9 Specialization1-21 04 01-02 04 Information Systems in Culture …………………..10 Specialty 1-23 01 14 Sociocultural Activity (according to directions) Specialization 1-23 01 14 01 Organization and Methodology of Sociocultural Activity in Leisure and Recreation Establishments, 1-23 01 14 03 Organization and Methodology of Sociocultural Activity at Health Resort and Tourist and sport Establishments ………………………………………………………………………11 Specialty 1-21 04 02 Art Criticism (according to directions) Specialization 1-21 04 02-05 01 Comparative Art Criticism ……………………….12 FACULTY OF INFORMATION AND DOCUMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1-23 01 11 Library Science and Bibliography (according to directions) Specialization 23 01 11-01 01 Library Marketing …………………………………..13 Specialization 1-23 01 11-01 03 Cultural and Leisure Activity …………………….14 Specialization 1-23 01 11-01 04 Library Service for Children and Youth …………15 Specialization 1-23 01 11-01 05 Library Science and Bibliography
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Belarusian National Movement in The
    EVOLUTION OF THE BELARUSIAN NATIONAL MOVEMENT IN THE PAGES OF PERIODICALS (1914-1917) By Aliaksandr Bystryk Submitted to Central European University Nationalism Studies Program In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Advisor: Professor Maria Kovacs Secondary advisor: Professor Alexei Miller CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2013 Abstract Belarusian national movement is usually characterised by its relative weakness delayed emergence and development. Being the weakest movement in the region, before the WWI, the activists of this movement mostly engaged in cultural and educational activities. However at the end of First World War Belarusian national elite actively engaged in political struggles happening in the territories of Western frontier of the Russian empire. Thus the aim of the thesis is to explain how the events and processes caused by WWI influenced the national movement. In order to accomplish this goal this thesis provides discourse and content analysis of three editions published by the Belarusian national activists: Nasha Niva (Our Field), Biełarus (The Belarusian) and Homan (The Clamour). The main findings of this paper suggest that the anticipation of dramatic social and political changes brought by the war urged national elite to foster national mobilisation through development of various organisations and structures directed to improve social cohesion within Belarusian population. Another important effect of the war was that a part of Belarusian national elite formulated certain ideas and narratives influenced by conditions of Ober-Ost which later became an integral part of Belarusian national ideology. CEU eTD Collection i Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. Between krajowość and West-Russianism: The Development of the Belarusian National Movement Prior to WWI .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Book
    84 823 65 Special thanks to the Independent Institute of Socio-Economic and Political Studies for assistance in getting access to archival data. The author also expresses sincere thanks to the International Consortium "EuroBelarus" and the Belarusian Association of Journalists for information support in preparing this book. Photos by ByMedia.Net and from family albums. Aliaksandr Tamkovich Contemporary History in Faces / Aliaksandr Tamkovich. — 2014. — ... pages. The book contains political essays about people who are well known in Belarus and abroad and who had the most direct relevance to the contemporary history of Belarus over the last 15 to 20 years. The author not only recalls some biographical data but also analyses the role of each of them in the development of Belarus. And there is another very important point. The articles collected in this book were written at different times, so today some changes can be introduced to dates, facts and opinions but the author did not do this INTENTIONALLY. People are not less interested in what we thought yesterday than in what we think today. Information and Op-Ed Publication 84 823 © Aliaksandr Tamkovich, 2014 AUTHOR’S PROLOGUE Probably, it is already known to many of those who talked to the author "on tape" but I will reiterate this idea. I have two encyclopedias on my bookshelves. One was published before 1995 when many people were not in the position yet to take their place in the contemporary history of Belarus. The other one was made recently. The fi rst book was very modest and the second book was printed on classy coated paper and richly decorated with photos.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine in World War II
    Ukraine in World War II. — Kyiv, Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance, 2015. — 28 p., ill. Ukrainians in the World War II. Facts, figures, persons. A complex pattern of world confrontation in our land and Ukrainians on the all fronts of the global conflict. Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance Address: 16, Lypska str., Kyiv, 01021, Ukraine. Phone: +38 (044) 253-15-63 Fax: +38 (044) 254-05-85 Е-mail: [email protected] www.memory.gov.ua Printed by ПП «Друк щоденно» 251 Zelena str. Lviv Order N30-04-2015/2в 30.04.2015 © UINR, texts and design, 2015. UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF NATIONAL REMEMBRANCE www.memory.gov.ua UKRAINE IN WORLD WAR II Reference book The 70th anniversary of victory over Nazism in World War II Kyiv, 2015 Victims and heroes VICTIMS AND HEROES Ukrainians – the Heroes of Second World War During the Second World War, Ukraine lost more people than the combined losses Ivan Kozhedub Peter Dmytruk Nicholas Oresko of Great Britain, Canada, Poland, the USA and France. The total Ukrainian losses during the war is an estimated 8-10 million lives. The number of Ukrainian victims Soviet fighter pilot. The most Canadian military pilot. Master Sergeant U.S. Army. effective Allied ace. Had 64 air He was shot down and For a daring attack on the can be compared to the modern population of Austria. victories. Awarded the Hero joined the French enemy’s fortified position of the Soviet Union three Resistance. Saved civilians in Germany, he was awarded times. from German repression. the highest American The Ukrainians in the Transcarpathia were the first during the interwar period, who Awarded the Cross of War.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism in the Soviet and Post-Soviet Space: the Cases of Belarus and Ukraine Goujon, Alexandra
    www.ssoar.info Nationalism in the Soviet and post-Soviet space: the cases of Belarus and Ukraine Goujon, Alexandra Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Arbeitspapier / working paper Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Goujon, A. (1999). Nationalism in the Soviet and post-Soviet space: the cases of Belarus and Ukraine. (Arbeitspapiere des Osteuropa-Instituts der Freien Universität Berlin, Arbeitsschwerpunkt Politik, 22). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, Osteuropa-Institut Abt. Politik. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-440316 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western Or the Latin Civilization? Piotra Murzionak
    Comparative Civilizations Review Volume 78 | Number 78 Article 5 4-2018 Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or the Latin Civilization? Piotra Murzionak Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Murzionak, Piotra (2018) "Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or the Latin Civilization?," Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 78 : No. 78 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol78/iss78/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Civilizations Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Murzionak: Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or t Comparative Civilizations Review 41 Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or the Latin Civilization? Piotra Murzionak Abstract The aim of this article is to further develop the idea of the existence of a distinct Belarusian-Ukrainian/Western-Ruthenian civilization, to define its place among Western sub-civilizations, as well as to argue against the designation of Belarus and Ukraine as belonging to the Eurasian civilization. Most of the provided evidence will be related to Belarus; however, it also applies to Ukraine, the country that has had much in common with Belarus in its historical and cultural inheritance since the 9th and 10th centuries. Key words: designation, Belarus, Europe, civilization Introduction The designation of a modern country or group of countries to one or another civilization bears two aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • Polosa English Mart 2014.Indd
    International vector Country image Top managers of Belarusbank meet with Ambassador Darya Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Domracheva of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has imprinted in Belarus Bruce Bucknell. her name in the Olympic history Siarhei Pisaryk, Belarusbank’s Chairman of the Board, Bruce Bucknell, British Ambassador to Belarus, Uladzimir Novik, Belarusbank’s Deputy Chairman of the Board The name of Darya Domracheva Special focus on Belarus-UK will forever stay in the history of biathlon, financial cooperation the Olympic movement, and he parties discussed the modern cooperation between history of TBelarus and the UK, paying Belarus, says Belarusbank’s special attention to collaboration Chairman of the Board between Belarusian and British companies, the support of Siarhei Pisaryk. Belarusian export and direct foreign investments in the “ arya’s Belarusian economy. One of the unpre- issues on the meeting’s agenda Dceden- was the planned foundation ted victory of Belarus-UK Business evokes Cooperation Council, which unprecedented will consist of representatives emotions. of financial institutions and We admire insurance companies from both her extreme countries. Presently cooperation At Lloyd’s of London: V. Novik, T. Nadolny, S. Aleynik (Belarus Ambassador to UK), professionalism, between the two countries K. Savrassov (Senior Vice President of Phoenix-CRetro, President of the British-Belarus Chamber of Commerce), willpower, lies within the domain of the V. Shumski (Trade Adviser of the Belarusian Embassy in UK) self-devotion, British-Belarusian Chamber together with First Deputy an agreement with Belarusian with tied and untied long- which go in of Commerce. The foundation Chairman of the Board of BPS-Sberbank to set up term loans.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus's Options in the Midst of a Color Revolution — Strategic Culture
    EDITOR'S СHOICE Belarus’s Options in the Midst of a Color Revolution August 27, 2020 A “color revolution” is a media term for a movement based on legitimate grievances only to be co-opted into a regime change operation backed by the US and confederates. There have been so many – Georgia in 2003, Ukraine in 2004, Kyrgyzstan in 2005 – that they have run out of colors. Belarus is amidst the “slipper” color revolution. The last Soviet republic Belarus, a former constituent republic of the USSR, declared its sovereignty in 1990 with the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Under its new and now contested President Alexander Lukashenko, first elected in 1994, Belarus rejected the western-imposed “economic shock therapy” that looted the public wealth of many of the other former Soviet republics. Earning the sobriquet of the “last Soviet republic,” Belarus retained state-run industry and agriculture, the social safety net, and the relative equality of the socialist period. Along with that came the enduring Cold War enmity of the US and its NATO epigones. In contrast, the newly “liberated” Russian Federation, with its US-installed leader Boris Yeltsin and its cabal of nouveau riche oligarchs, was plundered by western capital. (Note: The Slavs have “oligarchs,” while the US has “philanthropists” like Turner, Gates, and Soros.) Its standard of living, social services, and life expectancy went into freefall. Initially, Belarus was more prosperous than Russia, but as the Belarusian economy slowed in the early 2000s, the Russian economy surged with the ascendance of Vladimir Putin. The sprawling US embassy in Belarus occupies an area the size of a city block.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus Country Report BTI 2012
    BTI 2012 | Belarus Country Report Status Index 1-10 4.36 # 101 of 128 Political Transformation 1-10 3.93 # 96 of 128 Economic Transformation 1-10 4.79 # 87 of 128 Management Index 1-10 2.81 # 116 of 128 scale: 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest) score rank trend This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2012. The BTI is a global assessment of transition processes in which the state of democracy and market economy as well as the quality of political management in 128 transformation and developing countries are evaluated. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2012 — Belarus Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2012. © 2012 Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh BTI 2012 | Belarus 2 Key Indicators Population mn. 9.5 HDI 0.756 GDP p.c. $ 13928 Pop. growth1 % p.a. -0.2 HDI rank of 187 65 Gini Index 27.2 Life expectancy years 70 UN Education Index 0.776 Poverty3 % <2 Urban population % 74.3 Gender inequality2 - Aid per capita $ 10.1 Sources: The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2011 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2011. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $2 a day. Executive Summary The presidential elections of December 2010 proved to be a turning point in the reporting period. After officially winning nearly 80% of the votes, incumbent President Alyaksandar Lukashenka was declared the winner. The OSCE later criticized the elections as failing to meet democratic standards.
    [Show full text]