DOCSLIB.ORG

Belarus's Options in the Midst of a Color Revolution — Strategic Culture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Belarus's Options in the Midst of a Color Revolution — Strategic Culture EDITOR'S СHOICE Belarus’s Options in the Midst of a Color Revolution August 27, 2020 A “color revolution” is a media term for a movement based on legitimate grievances only to be co-opted into a regime change operation backed by the US and confederates. There have been so many – Georgia in 2003, Ukraine in 2004, Kyrgyzstan in 2005 – that they have run out of colors. Belarus is amidst the “slipper” color revolution. The last Soviet republic Belarus, a former constituent republic of the USSR, declared its sovereignty in 1990 with the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Under its new and now contested President Alexander Lukashenko, first elected in 1994, Belarus rejected the western-imposed “economic shock therapy” that looted the public wealth of many of the other former Soviet republics. Earning the sobriquet of the “last Soviet republic,” Belarus retained state-run industry and agriculture, the social safety net, and the relative equality of the socialist period. Along with that came the enduring Cold War enmity of the US and its NATO epigones. In contrast, the newly “liberated” Russian Federation, with its US-installed leader Boris Yeltsin and its cabal of nouveau riche oligarchs, was plundered by western capital. (Note: The Slavs have “oligarchs,” while the US has “philanthropists” like Turner, Gates, and Soros.) Its standard of living, social services, and life expectancy went into freefall. Initially, Belarus was more prosperous than Russia, but as the Belarusian economy slowed in the early 2000s, the Russian economy surged with the ascendance of Vladimir Putin. The sprawling US embassy in Belarus occupies an area the size of a city block. Clearly, the Yanks do more than just issue visas. The US is preoccupied with regime change. In 2004, the US passed the Belarus Democracy Act overtly funding anti-government NGOs in Belarus and prohibiting loans. The tribulations of triangulation The official languages of Belarus are Belarusian and Russian. Some 80% of the population is ethnic Belarusian followed by Russian. In 2000, Belarus and Russia established the Union State, a supranational confederation for economic integration and common defense. Though the two sovereigns declared the goal of a single entity, efforts at implementation have variously been stalled by Lukashenko. Russia sells oil and natural gas to Belarus at discounted rates. Belarus permits Russia to have a missile defense system on its territory, which is considered a critical deterrent against a NATO nuclear first strike. Following the US-backed coup in neighboring Ukraine in 2014, Lukashenko took a more independent, nationalist tack, reflecting the predicament of Belarus as a buffer between Russia and an increasingly aggressive NATO. Lukashenko has tried to triangulate between Russia and the West. Muammar Gaddafi chose a similarly conciliatory path, which ended badly for him and his country. Internationally, Belarus has sided mainly with Russia in addition to upholding Palestinian rights, warm relations with Venezuela, and trade with Syria. From Washington’s perspective, these have been fatal moves for Lukashenko. But the primary motivator of US foreign policy – with Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia joining NATO in 2004 and post-coup Ukraine likely on the way – is to complete the military occupation of Russia’s western border. Hence “Europe’s last dictator” must go. Playing both carrot and stick, US Secretary of State Pompeo visited Belarus last February to conclude an oil deal to wean Belarus from dependence on Russian-sourced petrol. Then in April, the US and Belarus reestablished diplomatic relations. The National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the quasi-governmental US agency which does legally what the CIA does extra-legally, currently lists projects in Belarus euphemistically described as “developing civil society,” “fostering freedom of the media,” and “fostering youth activism.” They sound so good that one might wish for the NED to import some “pro-democracy measures” back to the homeland. Legitimate protest morphs in a reactionary direction In the run-up to the August 9 presidential election in Belarus, credible reports circulated of suppression of the opposition. Lukashenko won with a less than credible 80% of the vote. Still most observers not aligned with the regime-change project believe he carried a majority. The runner-up candidate, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, received 10% of the vote. She absconded to Lithuania after the election, where she proclaimed herself the winner and ready to lead Belarus. The West now has their puppet president in exile. Mass protests, including a showing of industrial workers, erupted calling not only for “free and fair elections,” but for total system change. A national protest strike, centered in Minsk, is in the making. Angry young people wave the red and white flag that was flown during the Nazi occupation, as the opposition protest morphs into a force aligned with the West and against anything Russian. While the leadership of these protests is deeply anti-Russian, most of the protestors are not. But the winds of xenophobia are being fanned. An initially legitimate protest movement is being co-opted by foreign interests. Program for a complete reorientation of the Belarusian state and society The call for “democracy” raises the question of democracy for whom and under what kind of system. A coalition of opposition groups published a program of the Belarusian opposition. Among the sponsors of the program is the USAID, the cover agency for the CIA. A nearly identical document had been promulgated in 2014 after the Ukrainian coup. This published opposition program calls for a complete reorientation of the Belarusian state and society from east to west and the establishment of a neoliberal political economy. Politically, Belarus would withdraw from the Union State and all other structures where Russia is prominent and join the European Union and NATO. In conjunction with the privatization of state enterprises and the creation of a thorough market economy, purchase of Belarusian enterprises by Russia would be prohibited while being opened to western corporate interests. Russian media along with scientific and cultural exchanges would be suppressed. The official use of the Russian language would be banned in a nation where 70% speak Russian at home. Even the Belarusian Orthodox Church would replace the Belarusian Exarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church. The embers of reactionary nationalism would be fanned. The situation is volatile By just about all accounts, Lukashenko’s 26-year rule of Belarus degenerated with questionable elections, authoritarian practices, mismanagement, and corruption. Even if Lukashenko won the last election, he has lost much of his credibility with his people, certainly with the West, and even with his Russian ally. The US involvement in Belarus is not nearly as overt as it was in the Ukraine coup and, given the circumstances, may not need to be to achieve desired outcomes. Obama’s former deputy national security advisor, Ben Rhodes, tweeted on August 11: “Americans have to recognize that the fight against Lukashenko in Belarus is our fight.” Similarly, the UK, France, and Germany are fishing in these troubled waters along with Poland and the Baltic states. While Russia and China have recognized Lukashenko’s election, they have not more vigorously supported him publicly. Lukashenko may have thought through the consequences of his previous stance: “There will be no other elections, unless you kill me.” He appears to have reassessed his options and is triangulating back towards the Union State with Russia in hopes of weathering the protests and, perhaps, holding elections in the new state. The West is bent on Lukashenko’s ouster and Putin is at best lukewarm. Domestically the intelligentsia are alienated, workers discontented, and even his security services show signs of disloyalty. Lukashenko may try to save his skin and the quasi-socialist state he founded by a “phased leadership transition.” A small fish in a superpower sea Despite the complexity of contending interests, international law and the principle of non-intervention in the internal affairs of sovereign states must be upheld. Belarus needs to have the freedom to resolve the crisis without outside interference. Based on the examples of Ukraine, Moldova, Romania, and Poland, Armin Fischer, a German observer, warns that a color revolution in Belarus could bring: “the liquidation of state enterprises, mass layoffs, collapse of collective farms, mass exodus from the countryside and the death of villages…disintegration of the social infrastructure of daycare centers, hospitals, old people’s homes and the consequences for life expectancy, alcoholism and neglect…. In return, you will certainly get new oligarchs.” “Free elections,” Fischer admonishes, would bring the “freedom” to be migrant workers competing for low-paying, undesirable jobs in Western Europe. The leaders of the eighteen Communist parties of the former Soviet republics recall the consequences of the dissolution of the USSR in their August 18th statement on Belarus: “In Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Moldova, Russia, and Tajikistan, a bloody conflagration of fratricidal interethnic war broke out. In the Baltic States, the neo-fascists who came to power staged a real apartheid – they divided the entire population of their ‘independent,’ ‘democratic’ States into ‘citizens’ and disenfranchised sub-humans, the so-called ‘non-citizens.’” Belarus under Lukashenko has its faults. Even so, a neoliberal coup would be worse for the people. The economic collapse of post-coup Ukraine, now the poorest country in Europe, serves as a cautionary example. Those who condemn the excesses of the present government need also consider the greater bloodbaths that followed rightist putsches in other former Soviet republics. George W. Bush’s declaration of “you’re either with us or with the terrorists” epitomizes the dilemma of Belarus in a world dominated by a hegemonic superpower. The playbook is familiar. Years of foreign subversion feeding on genuine domestic discontent erupts into an orchestrated regime change movement.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Common Core Document Forming Part of the Reports of States Parties
    United Nations HRI/CORE/BLR/2011 International Human Rights Distr.: General 22 November 2012 Instruments English Original: Russian Common core document forming part of the reports of States parties Belarus* [15 December 2011] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not formally edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.12-48099 (E) 211212 040113 HRI/CORE/BLR/2011 Contents Paragraphs Page I. General information about the Republic of Belarus................................................ 1–56 3 A. Geographical situation.................................................................................... 1–5 3 B. Constitutional, political and legal structure of the State ................................. 6–16 3 C. Economic, social and cultural characteristics................................................. 17–45 4 D. Demographic situation.................................................................................... 46–56 7 II. General framework for the protection and promotion of human rights .................. 57–244 8 A. Acceptance of international human rights norms ........................................... 57–61 8 B. Legal framework for the protection of human rights at the national level...... 62–75 9 C. Framework within which human rights are promoted at the national level.... 76–236 11 1. The right to a decent standard of living.................................................. 76–83 11 2. The right
    [Show full text]
  • Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western Or the Latin Civilization? Piotra Murzionak
    Comparative Civilizations Review Volume 78 | Number 78 Article 5 4-2018 Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or the Latin Civilization? Piotra Murzionak Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Murzionak, Piotra (2018) "Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or the Latin Civilization?," Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 78 : No. 78 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol78/iss78/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Civilizations Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Murzionak: Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or t Comparative Civilizations Review 41 Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or the Latin Civilization? Piotra Murzionak Abstract The aim of this article is to further develop the idea of the existence of a distinct Belarusian-Ukrainian/Western-Ruthenian civilization, to define its place among Western sub-civilizations, as well as to argue against the designation of Belarus and Ukraine as belonging to the Eurasian civilization. Most of the provided evidence will be related to Belarus; however, it also applies to Ukraine, the country that has had much in common with Belarus in its historical and cultural inheritance since the 9th and 10th centuries. Key words: designation, Belarus, Europe, civilization Introduction The designation of a modern country or group of countries to one or another civilization bears two aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • There Is Another Quite Interesting and Well-Reasoned Theory of the Origin Of
    NATION-BUILDING IN BELARUS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY MAIYA FAMICH IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY FEBRUARY 2012 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Meliha Benli Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Ayşe Saktanber Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşegül Aydıngün Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı (METU, ADM) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşegul Aydıngün (METU, SOC) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Erdoğan Yıldırım (METU, SOC) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Maiya Famich Signature : iii ABSTRACT NATION-BUILDING IN BELARUS Famich, Maiya M. Sc., Department of Sociology Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşegül Aydıngün February 2012, 134 pages The purpose of this thesis is to examine the process of nation-building in the Republic of Belarus from 1991 till the present time. The focus is made on two main projects of nation-building presented by the official authorities and the political opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus Who Are Either (1) Qibs (As Defined Below) Or (2) Located Outside the United States
    IMPORTANT NOTICE THIS OFFERING IS AVAILABLE ONLY TO INVESTORS OUTSIDE OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS WHO ARE EITHER (1) QIBS (AS DEFINED BELOW) OR (2) LOCATED OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES. IMPORTANT: You must read the following before continuing. The following applies to the document following this page (the “Prospectus”), whether received by e-mail, accessed from an internet page or received as a result of electronic transmission, and you are therefore advised to read this carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of the Prospectus. In accessing the Prospectus, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them any time you receive any information as a result of such access. The Prospectus has been prepared solely in connection with the proposed offering to certain institutional and professional investors of the securities described herein. NOTHING IN THIS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES AN OFFER OF SECURITIES FOR SALE OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER, SALE OR SOLICITATION IS NOT PERMITTED. THE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN, AND WILL NOT BE, REGISTERED UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT”), OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE OF THE U.S. OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION AND THE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD WITHIN THE U.S. EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM, OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT AND APPLICABLE STATE OR LOCAL SECURITIES LAWS. THE PROSPECTUS MAY NOT BE FORWARDED OR DISTRIBUTED TO ANY OTHER PERSON AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER ANY FORWARDING, DISTRIBUTION OR REPRODUCTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IN WHOLE OR IN PART IS UNAUTHORISED.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ever Closer Union? Ramifications of Further Integration Between Belarus and Russia
    An Ever Closer Union? Ramifications of further integration between Belarus and Russia Bob Deen Clingendael Report Barbara Roggeveen Wouter Zweers An Ever Closer Union? Ramifications of further integration between Belarus and Russia Bob Deen Barbara Roggeveen Wouter Zweers Clingendael Report August 2021 Disclaimer: The research for and production of this report have been conducted within the PROGRESS research framework agreement. Responsibility for the contents and for the opinions expressed, rests solely with the authors and does not constitute, nor should be construed as, an endorsement by the Netherlands Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Defense. August 2021 © Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Cover photo: Russian President Vladimir Putin meets with his Belarusian counterpart Alexander Lukashenko in Sochi, Russia May 28, 2021 © Reuters Unauthorized use of any materials violates copyright, trademark and / or other laws. Should a user download material from the website or any other source related to the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, or the Clingendael Institute, for personal or non-commercial use, the user must retain all copyright, trademark or other similar notices contained in the original material or on any copies of this material. Material on the website of the Clingendael Institute may be reproduced or publicly displayed, distributed or used for any public and non-commercial purposes, but only by mentioning the Clingendael Institute as its source. Permission is required to use the logo of the Clingendael Institute. This can be obtained by contacting the Communication desk of the Clingendael Institute ([email protected]). The following web link activities are prohibited by the Clingendael Institute and may present trademark and copyright infringement issues: links that involve unauthorized use of our logo, framing, inline links, or metatags, as well as hyperlinks or a form of link disguising the URL.
    [Show full text]
  • 1930 1466074903 G1600637.Pdf
    United Nations HRI/CORE/BLR/2015 International Human Rights Distr.: General 18 January 2016 Instruments English Original: Russian Common core document forming part of the reports of States parties Belarus* [20 November 2015] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not formally edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.16-00542 (E) 050416 050416 HRI/CORE/BLR/2015 Contents Page I. General information about the Republic of Belarus ...................................................................... 3 A. Geographical situation .......................................................................................................... 3 B. Constitutional, political and legal structure of the State ....................................................... 3 C. Economic, social and cultural characteristics ....................................................................... 4 D. Demographic situation .......................................................................................................... 7 II. General framework for the protection and promotion of human rights ......................................... 8 A. Acceptance of international human rights norms.................................................................. 8 B. Legal framework for the protection of human rights at the national level ............................ 9 C. Framework within which human rights are promoted at the national level .........................
    [Show full text]
  • BELARUS (Bielarus)
    CLASSROOM COUNTRY PROFILES BELARUS (Bielarus) Belarus has been an independent nation since 1991. The term Belarus means “White Russia” and in the process of rising na- tionalism, Belarus is a relative latecomer. Located at low eleva- tion on a vast plain between Russia, Poland, Ukraine, and the Baltic states, Belarus features gradual change, geographically and culturally. Belarus has maintained fairly close ties to Russia in the aftermath of the Soviet collapse and has been dominated by one political leader, Alexander Lukashenko for over 20 years. The capital city of Minsk is located along the major trans- portation routes between Russia and Western Europe. Religion in Belarus is predominantly of the Eastern Orthodox Christian Population: 9.5 million variety. The two largest ethnic groups in the country, Belarusians and Area: 207,595 sq. km. (size of Kansas) Russians have been Orthodox in tradition for over a thousand years. The Capital: Minsk (2 million ) second largest religious affiliation is Roman Catholic, and represented Languages: Russian and Belarusian (official) primarily by the Polish minority. Belarus has no official state religion and both Catholic and Orthodox versions of Christmas and Easter are cele- brated by state holiday. Freedom of religion is protected by the Constitu- Belarusian education is regulated and run by the tion, however, the political nature of certain religious affiliations (for exam- state. It is unclear what the distinction between ple Catholicism and Poland) has led to the degradation of religious free- public and private institutions of higher learning is doms in recent years. In the aftermath of the atheist Soviet era, a large as both exist and yet all are strictly regulated in proportion of Belarusians (41%) are irreligious.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Feb 2019 Team Leader's Technical Manual
    TABLE TENNIS Team Leaders’ Technical Manual MINSK 2019 DISCLAIMER All information in this Manual was correct at the time of going to press. Changes to schedules, procedures, facilities and services, along with any other essential updates, will be communicated to teams by competition management if required. Changes to the competition schedule will also appear on the Games-time Website, while any changes to the training schedule will be communicated by the Sport Entries and Sport Information Centre (hereinafter–SIC) in the Athletes’ Village (hereinafter–AVL) and Sport Information Desk (hereinafter – SID) in the Tennis Olympic Centre, which is the Venue for Table Tennis. WELCOME The 2nd European Games MINSK 2019 (MINSK 2019) will welcome more than 4,000 Athletes, more than 2,000 supporting Team Officials and about 1,000 Technical Officials from across Europe to participate in an elite-level sport competition. We aim to provide all participants with optimal conditions so that they are able to perform at their best. This Manual will help with preparations and Games-time operations as it provides key information including the relevant competition rules and format, medal events, competition schedule and key dates. Each client group – Athletes, Team Officials – also has its own dedicated section within the Manual that includes the information that is relevant to it. The Manual also includes details of the relevant venue, medical, anti-doping, training and competition related services, as well as the key policies and procedures that will be in place during the Games for each client group. We hope that this Manual helps with your planning in the time remaining before MINSK 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Periodic Review 2009 Republic of Belarus
    UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW 2009 REPUBLIC OF BELARUS NGO: European Centre for Law and Justice 4, Quai Koch, 67000 Strasbourg, France. RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS SECTION 1: Legal Framework I. Constitutional Provisions The Constitution of the Republic of Belarus states that the country’s laws are based on democracy and the rule of law.1 However, the “republic” resembles a dictatorship2 that has been under the governance of President and Chief of State Aleksandr Lukashenko since 1994.3 The Belarusian Constitution of 1994 was revised by national referendum in 1996, greatly expanding powers of the President; it was revised again in 2004, removing presidential term limits.4 Article 31 of the Constitution guarantees citizens the right to freedom of conscience and religious belief,5 and each citizen is also guaranteed the freedom of expression, information, association, and assembly.6 Article 4 guarantees that no religion or ideology may be compelled; article 5 prohibits political parties or public associations from propagandizing religion.7 “Although the Constitution affirms the equality of religions and denominations before the law; however, it contains restrictive language stipulating that cooperation between the state and religious organizations ‘is regulated with regard for their influence on the formation of spiritual, cultural, and state traditions of the Belarusian people.’”8 In addition, the Office of the Plenipotentiary Representative for Religious and Nationality Affairs (“OPRRNA”) regulates all religious matters.9 The Constitution recognizes no state religion; however, the Belarusian Orthodox Church (“BOC”), a branch of the Russian Orthodox Church (“ROC”), is the only officially recognized Orthodox denomination.10 According to OPRRNA, 80 percent of the religious citizens of Belarus 1 CONST.
    [Show full text]
  • Frantsishak Skaryna Belarusian Language Society
    The NGO Frantsishak Skaryna Belarusian Language Society Г ’я ы ы ія Фціш ыы Quick facts Our Language Breakthroughs Activities Cooperation Quick facts about the Belarusian Language Society Our Society is a non-governmental organization, established in . )ts irst two chairpersons were the People’s Poets of Belarus N. (ilevich and (. Buraukin. The objectives: defense of linguistic rights; promotion of the Belarusian language and culture. Numbers ca 7 thousand members within several hundred branches in Belarus and abroad. Named in honor of Frantsishak Skaryna 9 – 5, the Belarusian irst print- er. Our logo combines Skaryna’s personal sign with the Belarusian national historical symbols. Our Language Belarusian is the language of the Bel- irst written constitution in Europe. arusian people. )t is one of the Eastern Frantsishak Skaryna became the irst Frantsishak Skaryna Slavic languages, which belong to the Belarusian and Eastern Slavic printer. Slavic branch of the )ndo-European lan- (is translation of the Bible was among guage family. Belarusian is one of the the irst in Renaissance Europe. two state languages of Belarus. )t is also )n the 7th century, after many Bela- spoken in other countries and is a rec- rusians had been resettled to Moscow, ognized regional or minority language Old Belarusian had an enormous inlu- in Poland, Ukraine and the Czech Re- ence on the dialect of Moscow and actu- public. Belarusian is the mother tongue ally became the language of the Russian of more than million people in Bela- tsar’s court. )t had also been the oicial The font Бія by M. rus.
    [Show full text]
  • 134488 Project Belarus Pt1.Qxp
    REPUBLIC OF BELARUS U.S.$600,000,000 8.75 per cent. Notes due 2015 Issue price: 99.011 per cent. The U.S.$600,000,000 8.75 per cent. Notes due 2015 (the “Notes”) are issued by the Republic of Belarus (the “Issuer” or “Belarus”). Interest will be payable semi-annually in arrear on 3 February and 3 August of each year from and including 3 August 2010 at the rate of 8.75 per cent. per annum. Unless previously redeemed or cancelled, the Notes will be redeemed at their principal amount on 3 August 2015. Payments on the Notes will be made in U.S. dollars without deduction for or on account of taxes imposed by the Issuer to the extent described under “Conditions of the Notes”. Application has been made to the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (the “CSSF”) in its capacity as competent authority under the Luxembourg Act dated 10 July 2005 (the “Luxembourg Act”) on prospectuses for securities to approve this document as a prospectus and to the Luxembourg Stock Exchange for the listing of the Notes on the Official List of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and admission to trading on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s regulated market. An investment in Notes involves certain risks. Prospective investors should have regard to the factors described under the heading “Risk Factors” on page 1. The Notes have not been, and will not be, registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) or with any securities regulatory authority of any state of the United States or other jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Latinitas and Identity Formation in the Polish Crown and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (Sixteenth-Eighteenth Centuries)
    Latinitas and Identity Formation in the Polish Crown and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (Sixteenth-Eighteenth Centuries). An Introduction Giovanna Siedina (University of Verona, Italy) The idea of publishing the articles gathered here originated during the con- gress held in March 2012 in Florence, which was devoted to the influence of the Latin heritage on the formation and the development of identities in the lands of the Polish Crown and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the sixteenth-eighteenth centuries. The authors of the articles are some of the major specialists on this topic from Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine, Belarus and Italy. The influence of Latinitas in a wide and diversified territory as was that of the Polish Crown and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania is a very broad subject, which has many aspects. Only in recent years has it been studied from an areal point of view, and not only anachronistically in a modern ‘national’ key. This same topic was the subject of the thematic block that I organized for the 15th Congress of Slavists held in Minsk (Belarus) from August 20 to August 27, 2013. The considerable interest aroused by the papers read there1 and the lively discussion that ensued convinced me that the efforts lavished on organizing the congress and the thematic block were not in vain. The articles published here reflect, at least partly the different approaches and the different degree to which the Latin heritage has been studied in the coun- tries that now occupy the territory of the Polish Crown and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, that is Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania and Belarus.
    [Show full text]