DOCSLIB.ORG

Title: the Expansion of Intensive Beef Farming to the Brazilian Amazon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Title: the Expansion of Intensive Beef Farming to the Brazilian Amazon 1 Article type: Research Article 2 3 4 Title: The expansion of intensive beef farming to the Brazilian Amazon 5 6 Authors: Petterson Valea,b, Holly Gibbsa,c, Ricardo Valea,b, Matthew Christiea, Eduardo Florenced, 7 Jacob Mungera, Derquiane Sabainie 8 9 Affiliations: 10 aCenter for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE), University of Wisconsin-Madison, 11 1410 University Av., Madison, Wisconsin, 53705 12 bDepartment of Economics, University of São Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 13 14040-905, Brazil 14 cDepartment of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 550 N. Park st., Madison, WI, 53706 15 dLaboratory of Soils, State University of Mato Grosso, Rod. MT 208, km 147, Alta Floresta, MT, 16 78580-000, Brazil 17 eFederal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Acre, Rua Coronel José Galdino, 495, 18 Rio Branco, AC, 69900-640, Brazil 19 20 Corresponding author: Petterson Vale 21 Address: Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE), University of Wisconsin- 22 Madison, 1410 University Av., Madison, Wisconsin, 53705 23 Telephone: +1 608 6207983 24 E-mail: [email protected] 25 26 Keywords: feedlots, cattle, confinements, deforestation, intensification, productivity, Amazon, 27 Brazil 28 29 30 Acknowledgements 31 The authors are thankful to the informants and farmers who provided data for this research. Alcides Torres, 32 Ritaumaria Pereira, Paulo Barreto, Nathalie Walker, Francisco Beduschi, Raoni Rajão, Carlos Souza Jr., and 33 Kemel Kalif provided valuable feedback. Jens Engelman, Fanny Moffette, and Daniel Quinaud commented 34 on the manuscript. Scott Waldron, Jorge Funes, Shuo Li, Beichen Tian, Yu Wu, and Iliyas Nurseitov helped 35 with data sources. Elielton Pereira, Lúcio Mendes, and Raphael Szilagyi were assistants during field work. 36 Funding provided by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and Norwegian Agency for Development 37 Cooperation’s Department for Civil Society under the Norwegian Forest and Climate Initiative. All errors are 38 our own. 1 39 Abstract 40 Systems of intensive animal farming, such as the confinement of beef cattle, are widespread in the developed 41 world. Such practices have been under scrutiny since the 1960s for animal welfare and pollution issues. Here, 42 we document the expansion of intensive beef farming to the Brazilian Amazon in order to assess socio- 43 environmental implications. Using a combination of data mining and field surveys, we developed a 44 georeferenced dataset of 201 cattle confinements in the states of Mato Grosso (Cerrado and Amazon biomes), 45 Pará and Rondônia (Amazon biome), collected in 2017. In Mato Grosso, the country’s agribusiness 46 powerhouse, confinements are well established and account for ~20% of the cattle slaughter. But rapid 47 expansion in Pará and Rondônia remains largely unnoticed due to the absence of data since 2012. We used 48 the dataset to map cattle confinements across space and time. For the first time, (1) we document an 49 expansion to the Amazon biome; (2) we also show that confinements are associated with substantially higher 50 productivity rates, though intensified pasture-based systems can reach comparable yields; (3) that 51 confinements have crop production levels 2-3 times higher than comparable properties, both in- and out-of- 52 farm; and (4) that confinements tend to slow down on-property deforestation when compared to fattening 53 ranches in the Amazon biome, although off-property effects could be substantial and need further study. 54 Overall, the implications of intensive beef farming for animal welfare and local waste generation in Brazil 55 require attention as pressure to avoid deforestation continues to stimulate the practice. 2 56 1. Introduction 57 Ensuring food security to a rapidly growing human population while increasing environmental safeguards to 58 protect forests, biodiversity, and the climate is a central challenge for the present and coming decades. The 59 Brazilian part of the Amazon region encapsulates these concerns. It has become a major food producing area, 60 exporting soy and beef to global markets, while being under increased pressure to reduce the expansion of 61 livestock grazing and agricultural land. Raising the productivity of livestock systems is often encouraged as a 62 strategy that tackles both the food security and conservation objectives. In this paper, we show how highly 63 intensive forms of beef farming are on a rapid expansion from other states in Brazil toward the Amazon 64 region. We also explore the connections between systems of cattle confinement and an increase in land yields 65 and crop production, along with a decrease in on-property deforestation. 66 Systems of beef production are inevitably tied to food security. Indeed, terrestrial animals provided one third 67 of humanity’s daily protein intake of 27 g per capita in 2013 (Garnett et al., 2017, p. 18). While there are 68 marked differences among countries (Thornton, 2010), the global demand for meat is projected to reach 69 360/455 million tons by 2030/2050 (from 209 million in 2000), with a major growth in chicken and pig 70 consumption (Fiala, 2008; Thornton, 2010; Garnett et al., 2017, p. 98). In response to similar demands in 71 previous decades, systems of intensive animal farming grew at two to six times the rate of pasture-based and 72 mixed (crop-livestock, rain-fed) systems in the 1980s and early 1990s (Seré, Steinfeld and Groenewold, 1996, 73 p. 42). This led to a substantial expansion in what is known as industrial farming, landless farming, feedlots, 74 confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs, especially in the U.S.), or in Brazil, confinements. These 75 systems are characterized by: 1) very high animal density, often defined as at least 10 livestock units per 76 hectare; 2) rapid turnover; 3) reduced genetic variation; and 4) animals bred for high yield (Mennerat et al., 77 2010; Robinson et al., 2011). In Brazil, the confinement of cattle is also typically restricted to the last three 78 months of their life cycle (Merry and Soares-Filho, 2017). 79 The coupled land use dynamics of grazing areas and croplands also influence beef production patterns. The 80 appearance of the first feedlots in the U.S., for example, was an ingenious, productivity-enhancing solution to 81 the dissemination of cheap grains, especially corn, in the late 19th century (Hubbs, 2010; Purvis, 1998; Herath, 82 Weersink and Carpentier, 2005). Likewise, the transition to intensive beef farming in many countries today 83 can be linked to the availability of corn and soymeal (a by-product from soy widely used for animal feeding). 84 Census data from Brazil’s statistical agency (IBGE, 2012) confirm the link between on-property grain 85 production and the adoption of feedlots: cattle were 2.3 times more likely to be located on cropping- than on 86 ranching-dominated properties (SI-C). 87 Finally, environmental concerns around the conversion of land to make room for pasturelands are another 88 driver of change in the beef sector (Herrero et al., 2015). With livestock grazing dominated by extensive, 89 pasture-based ruminant systems (Herrero et al., 2015, p. 180) and occupying one quarter of the Earth’s ice- 90 free surface (FAO, 2009, p. 55), moving toward intensive production could substantially reduce its land 91 footprint (Bustamante et al., 2012; Cohn et al., 2014). This is especially true in Brazil, where cattle are the 92 most important driver of land conversion (Leite et al., 2012) and beef and dairy agroindustrial production 93 accounted for 63% of the cleared surface in the Amazon biome in 2000-2013 (Tyukavina et al., 2017). 94 Consequently, public policy and market-led approaches aiming to reduce deforestation have emphasized 95 Brazil’s livestock production practices (Thaler, 2017; Ceddia et al., 2014). For example, the Brazilian 96 government loaned US$ 3.9 billion in 2010-2018 to support the adoption of technologies to increase the 97 productivity of pastures (MAPA, 2018), and in 2015 the achievement of a ‘low carbon agriculture’ based on 98 improved pastures became one of Brazil’s pledges under the Paris climate agreement (MMA, 2015). In 2009, 99 a group of four large meatpacking groups in Brazil (JBS, Bertin, Marfrig, and Minerva) committed to 100 monitoring their cattle supply chains for deforestation in the Amazon (Gibbs et al., 2015). Additionally, a 3 101 variety of smaller initiatives by NGOs and research institutions provide incentives to encourage ranchers to 102 adopt land-saving technologies (Ermgassen et al., 2018). All of this incentivized a more efficient use of 103 pastures and at the same time drove the expansion of cattle confinements as systems where the use of land is 104 minimized. 105 As a result of pressure for livestock systems to increase yields, feedlots in Brazil grew by 442% in 1990-2017, 106 and by 55% in 2010-2013 alone (FNP, 2013, 2017), having outpaced the growth of cattle herds by 2.3 times 107 since 1990 (SI-C). Yet, despite this largescale change, there has been little study of the outcomes on 108 production or the environment. With the scale that confinements have already reached, an improved 109 understanding of the impacts on land yields, deforestation, and links to crop-producing areas, among many 110 other issues, is needed. 111 Here, we provide the first detailed characterization of intensive beef farming operations in a developing 112 country. We created a georeferenced dataset of 201 cattle confinements in the Cerrado and Amazon biomes 113 of Brazil by coupling key sources of property-level information to identify properties with a high propensity 114 to be cattle confinements. We then used field surveys to reach the most important cattle ranching areas in the 115 states of Mato Grosso, Pará, and Rondônia. This dataset was used to document the expansion of confinement 116 systems and to assess its land use implications.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wilson County, NC Agricultural Development Plan
    Wilson County Agricultural Development Plan Sandy Maddox, Ed. D. December 2017 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 6 A Need for Action .......................................................................................................................................... 9 Overview of Wilson County ........................................................................................................................ 12 Wilson County Demographics ................................................................................................................. 13 Economy.................................................................................................................................................. 15 Cost of Services ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Infrastructure .......................................................................................................................................... 18 Education ................................................................................................................................................ 19 Natural Attributes ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Increase Food Production Without Expanding Agricultural Land
    COURSE 2 Increase Food Production without Expanding Agricultural Land In addition to the demand-reduction measures addressed in Course 1, the world must boost the output of food on existing agricultural land. To approach the goal of net-zero expansion of agricultural land, improvements in crop and livestock productivity must exceed historical rates of yield gains. Chapter 10 assesses the land-use challenge, based on recent trend lines. Chapters 11–16 discuss possible ways to increase food production per hectare while adapting to climate change. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 10. Assessing the Challenge of Limiting Agricultural Land Expansion .............................147 Chapter 11. Menu Item: Increase Livestock and Pasture Productivity ........................................167 Chapter 12. Menu Item: Improve Crop Breeding to Boost Yields ..............................................179 Chapter 13. Menu Item: Improve Soil and Water Management ...............................................195 Chapter 14. Menu Item: Plant Existing Cropland More Frequently ........................................... 205 Chapter 15. Adapt to Climate Change ........................................................................... 209 Chapter 16. How Much Could Boosting Crop and Livestock Productivity Contribute to Closing the Land and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Gaps? .....................................................221 Creating a Sustainable Food Future 145 146 WRI.org CHAPTER 10 ASSESSING THE CHALLENGE OF LIMITING AGRICULTURAL LAND EXPANSION How hard will it be to stop net expansion of agricultural land? This chapter evaluates projections by other researchers of changes in land use and explains why we consider the most optimistic projections to be too optimistic. We discuss estimates of “yield gaps,” which attempt to measure the potential of farmers to increase yields given current crop varieties. Finally, we examine conflicting data about recent land-cover change and agricultural expansion to determine what they imply for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Causes and Consequences of Agricultural Expansion in Matopiba
    WORKING PAPER THE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF AGRICULTURAL EXPANSION IN MATOPIBA ARTHUR BRAGANÇA JULY 2016 THEME AGRICULTURE KEYWORDS AGRICULTURE, DEVELOPMENT, AGRICULTURAL FRONTIER The Land Use Initiative (INPUT – Iniciativa para o Uso da Terra) is a dedicated team of specialists who work at the forefront of how to increase environmental protection and food production. INPUT engages stakeholders in Brazil’s public and private sec¬tors and maps the challenges for a better management of its natural resources. Research conducted under INPUT is generously sup¬ported by the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF) through a grant to the Climate Policy Initiative. www.inputbrasil.org 3 The Causes and Consequences of Agricultural Expansion in Matopiba∗ Arthur Bragançay CPI July 2016 Abstract This paper examines the causes and consequences of the agricultural expansion in Matopiba (Brazil) over the past two decades. It documents that agricultural expansion in this region is concentrated in municipalities in the Cerrado biome. The estimates indicate that since the late 1990s agricultural output is increasing faster in municipal- ities in this biome when compared to municipalities outside the biome. Agricultural expansion led to increases in GDP per capita. The increase in GDP per capita is a re- sult of direct effects on the agricultural sector as well as indirect effects on services sector. The estimates also suggest that municipalities in the biome experienced larger gains in the access to durable consumer goods such as TV and refrigerator and in ba- sic infrastructure such as access to electric power. However, the results do not indicate differential changes in migration and human capital investments between Cerrado and non-Cerrado municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction Between Cultivation and Livestock Production in Semi-Arid
    13 The Interaction Between Cultivation and Livestock Production in Senmi-Arid Africa R.L. McCowN, G. HAVAAND, and C. DE HAAN 13.1 Introduction Although the majority of people in semi-arid Africa sustain themselves primarily by growing crops, this means of production is not pri:uticed by all, nor is it the sole means practiced by the majority. Because of inadequate rainfall and high evaporation rates, average crop yields are low, and the risk of crop failure Traditionally the inhabitants of is high. these regions have relied on domestic grazing animals to supplemenr their food supply. The ultimate degree of this embodied in pure pastoralism: dependence is however, semi-arid Afica has a wide variation, both in the nature and range of the degree of economic dependency on livestock. From the title of this chapter, the reader might reasonably expect a survey of current importance of livestock the in the agricut,iral regions of semi-arid Africa. even if we had the African experience But and relevant literatuie at our command attempt such a survey, it is to unlikely that this would be the most useful contribution. Instead, an attempt sort of is made to isolate the different types relationship or linkage that of characterize the interaction between cultivation livestock production and to consider and the conditions under which each linkage be expected to occur. Eight can cases from summer rainfall, semi-arid zones (Fig. 13.1) are described which of Africa demonstrate various configurations of existing production systems, linkages in together with the conditions under which developed. Finally, the trends they have in the forms of linkages from an evolutionary standpoint are considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Agricultural Management Systems on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Highly Simplified Dryland Landscapes
    sustainability Review Impacts of Agricultural Management Systems on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Highly Simplified Dryland Landscapes Subodh Adhikari 1,2,* , Arjun Adhikari 3,4, David K. Weaver 1 , Anton Bekkerman 5 and Fabian D. Menalled 1,* 1 Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173120, Bozeman, MT 59717-3120, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Nematology; 875 Perimeter Drive MS 2329, Moscow, ID 83844-2329, USA 3 Department of Ecology, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173460, Bozeman, MT 59717-3460, USA; [email protected] 4 Natural Resource Ecology and Management, 008C Agricultural Hall, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA 5 Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, P.O. Box 172920, Bozeman, MT 59717-3460, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.A.); [email protected] (F.D.M.) Received: 2 May 2019; Accepted: 9 June 2019; Published: 11 June 2019 Abstract: Covering about 40% of Earth’s land surface and sustaining at least 38% of global population, drylands are key crop and animal production regions with high economic and social values. However,land use changes associated with industrialized agricultural managements are threatening the sustainability of these systems. While previous studies assessing the impacts of agricultural management systems on biodiversity and their services focused on more diversified mesic landscapes, there is a dearth of such research
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Agricultural Expansion on Water Footprint in the Amazon Under Climate Change Scenarios
    Science of the Total Environment 569–570 (2016) 1159–1173 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Science of the Total Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv Impact of agricultural expansion on water footprint in the Amazon under climate change scenarios Laura Miguel Ayala a,⁎, Michiel van Eupen a, Guoping Zhang b, Marta Pérez-Soba a, Lucieta G. Martorano c, Leila S. Lisboa d, Norma E. Beltrao e a Alterra Wageningen University and Research Centre Alterra Wageningen University and Research, , Wageningen Campus, Building 101, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands b Water Footprint Network, International Water House, Bezuidenhoutseweg 2, 2594 AV, The Hague, The Netherlands c Embrapa Eastern Amazon, Trav. Dr. Enéas Pinheiro s/n° Caixa Postal, 48, CEP 66.095-100 Belém, Brazil d Esalq-São Paulo University, Av. Pádua Dias, 11 - Cx. Postal 9, Piracicaba CEP 13418-900, São Paulo, Brazil e University of Pará State, University of Para State – UEPA, Trav. Dr. Enéas Pinheiro 2626, CEP 66095-100 Belém, Brazil HIGHLIGHTS GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT • Agricultural expansion entails potential environmental impacts in nearby river basins. • Water Footprint Assessment analyses present & future watershed sustainabil- ity. • Green Water Scarcity: useful sustain- ability indicator accounting protection status. • Future soybean production impacts en- vironment beyond sustainability limits. article info abstract Article history: Agricultural expansion and intensification are main drivers of land-use change in Brazil. Soybean is the major Received 27 April 2016 crop under expansion in the area. Soybean production involves large amounts of water and fertiliser that act Received in revised form 23 June 2016 as sources of contamination with potentially negative impacts on adjacent water bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Revolution Andhra Pradesh
    Agriculture intensification population growth and cropland expansion: evidence from post- Green Revolution Andhra Pradesh Amarendra Pratap Singh1 and K Narayanan2 Abstract Increasing food demand due to rising population and urban growth may distort earth’s natural landscape unless technology driven intensification helps to spare land for alternative activities. Technological intervention in agriculture has not only increased agricultural yield which reflects land saving aspect of technology but it has also reduced fallow period substantially to increase effective supply of land which mirrors land augmenting aspect of technology. Here, we examine the impact of these two aspects of technology on cropland expansion for Andhra Pradesh using district level data over the period 1970-2009. Along with it, we also investigate the impact of growth in population, urban population and literate population on cropland expansion. We use a regression model based on the IPAT framework to measure the relative impact of affluence, population and technology on resource use. Results reject land sparing hypothesis in the state since the inception of new technology. However, population pressure on cropland seem to have declined. Other important result highlights the negative impact of urban growth on cropland expansion which implies that loss of prime cropland due to urban expansion cannot be refuted. Keywords: Land sparing, Land augmentation, Land saving, Jevons’ Paradox. 1. Introduction Population driven cropland expansion has been a major driver of land use change both at global as well as regional level (Ramankutty et al. 2002). Population-cropland debate goes back to Malthus (1798) who predicted that carrying capacity of earth is limited to satiate food demand of increasing human population.3 While Malthusian prediction has not been materialized yet; questions regarding feeding more and wealthier people using limited land resource are still 1 PhD Student, Department of humanities and Social Sciences, IIT Bombay.
    [Show full text]
  • Desertification and Agriculture
    BRIEFING Desertification and agriculture SUMMARY Desertification is a land degradation process that occurs in drylands. It affects the land's capacity to supply ecosystem services, such as producing food or hosting biodiversity, to mention the most well-known ones. Its drivers are related to both human activity and the climate, and depend on the specific context. More than 1 billion people in some 100 countries face some level of risk related to the effects of desertification. Climate change can further increase the risk of desertification for those regions of the world that may change into drylands for climatic reasons. Desertification is reversible, but that requires proper indicators to send out alerts about the potential risk of desertification while there is still time and scope for remedial action. However, issues related to the availability and comparability of data across various regions of the world pose big challenges when it comes to measuring and monitoring desertification processes. The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification and the UN sustainable development goals provide a global framework for assessing desertification. The 2018 World Atlas of Desertification introduced the concept of 'convergence of evidence' to identify areas where multiple pressures cause land change processes relevant to land degradation, of which desertification is a striking example. Desertification involves many environmental and socio-economic aspects. It has many causes and triggers many consequences. A major cause is unsustainable agriculture, a major consequence is the threat to food production. To fully comprehend this two-way relationship requires to understand how agriculture affects land quality, what risks land degradation poses for agricultural production and to what extent a change in agricultural practices can reverse the trend.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    69972 Options for Preparing a Sustainable Land Management (SLM) Program in Mali Consistent with TerrAfrica for World Bank Engagement at the Country Level Introduction Public Disclosure Authorized 1. Background and rationale: 1. One of the most environmentally vulnerable areas of the world is the drylands of sub-Saharan Africa, particularly the Sahel, the Horn of Africa and Southeast Africa. Mali, as with other dryland areas in this category, suffers from droughts approximately every 30 years. These droughts triple the number of people exposed to severe water scarcity at least once in every generation, leading to major food and health crisis. In general, dryland populations lag far behind the rest of the world in human well-being and development indicators. Similarly, the average infant mortality rate for dryland developing countries exceeds that for non-dryland countries by 23% or more. The human causes of degradation1 and desertification2 include direct factors such as land use (agricultural expansion in marginal areas, deforestation, overgrazing) and indirect factors (policy failures, population pressure, land tenure). The biophysical impacts of dessertification are regional and global climate change, impairment of carbon sequestation capacity, dust storms, siltation into rivers, downstream flooding, erosion gullies and dune formation. The social impacts are devestating- increasing poverty, decreased agricultural and silvicultural production and sometimes Public Disclosure Authorized malnutrition and/or death. 2. There are clear links between land degradation and poverty. Poverty is both a cause and an effect of land degradation. Poverty drives populations to exploit their environment unsustainably because of limited resources, poorly defined property rights and limited access to credit, which prevents them from investing resources into environmental management.
    [Show full text]
  • STUDIES in AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS No. 113
    Research Institute of Agricultural Economics Committee on Agricultural Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences STUDIES IN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS No. 113 AKI Budapest 2011 Studies in Agricultural Economics No. 113 The Studies in Agricultural Economics is a scientifi c journal published by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and the Research Institute of Agricultural Economics, Budapest. Papers of agricultural economics interpreted in a broad sense covering all fi elds of the subject includ- ing econometric, policy, marketing, fi nancial, social, rural development and environmental as- pects as well are published, subsequent to peer review and approval by the Editorial Board. Editorial Board Popp, József (Chairman) Szabó, Gábor (Editor-in-chief) Barnafi , László (Technical Editor) Lehota, József Bojnec, Štefan (Slovenia) Magda, Sándor Cruse, Richard M. (USA) Mészáros, Sándor Csáki, Csaba Mihók, Zsolt (Associate Editor) Fekete-Farkas, Mária Nábrádi, András Fehér, Alajos Nagy, Frigyes Fieldsend, Andrew Szakály, Zoltán Forgács, Csaba Szűcs, István Gorton, Matthew (United Kingdom) Tóth, József Heijman, W. J. M. (The Netherlands) Udovecz, Gábor Kapronczai, István Urfi , Péter Kiss, Judit Vizdák, Károly Lakner, Zoltán Manuscripts should be sent via e-mail to the Editor-in-chief ([email protected]). Instructions for the authors can be found on the website of the Research Institute of Agricultural Economics: http://www.aki.gov.hu HU ISSN 1418 2106 © Research Institute of Agricultural Economics 1463 Budapest, POB. 944. Hungary 2 Studies in Agricultural Economics No. 113 p. 47-66. (2011) The impact of crop protection on agricultural production Popp, József1 Hantos, Krisztina Abstract Chemical pesticides will continue to play a role in pest management for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Pollution from Agriculture: a Global Review
    LED BY Water pollution from agriculture: a global review Executive summary © FAO & IWMI, 2017 I7754EN/1/08.17 Water pollution from agriculture: a global review Executive summary by Javier Mateo-Sagasta (IWMI), Sara Marjani Zadeh (FAO) and Hugh Turral with contributions from Jacob Burke (formerly FAO) Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2017 and the International Water Management Institute on behalf of the Water Land and Ecosystems research program Colombo, 2017 FAO and IWMI encourage the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO and IWMI as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s and IWMI’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence- request or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/ publications) and can be purchased through [email protected]” © FAO and IWMI, 2017 Cover photograph: © Jim Holmes/IWMI Neil Palmer (IWMI) A GLOBAL WATER-QUALITY CRISIS AND THE ROLE OF AGRICULTURE Water pollution is a global challenge that has increased in both developed and developing countries, undermining economic growth as well as the physical and environmental health of billions of people.
    [Show full text]
  • Cattle, Cleared Forests, and Climate Change
    Cattle, Cleared Forests, and Climate Change Don Anair Amine Mahmassani Scoring America’s Top Brands on Their Deforestation-Free Beef Commitments and Practices July 2013 Each year, tropical forests are destroyed to clear land that is ultimately used for beef production, making beef the largest driver of tropical deforestation globally. South America’s forests are “ground zero” for beef-driven deforestation. Here, ranchers clear tropical forests and other ecosystems that its beef is truly deforestation-free. Second, each of these such as native grasslands and woodlands to create pastures, companies with a commitment focuses implementation only in the process releasing enormous amounts of heat-trapping on the Brazilian Amazon, even though many other ecosys- gases, destroying the habitat of wildlife such as jaguars and tems are also at risk. All companies also lack adequate trans- sloths, and encroaching on the homes of vulnerable indige- parency, which leaves consumers and investors in the dark nous peoples. about whether companies are carefully monitoring and The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) evaluated evaluating their supply chains for tropical deforestation. 13 consumer goods companies in the fast food, retail, and Beef can be produced without deforestation. The compa- food manufacturing sectors that have the power to help stop nies scored in this report have the power to help save forests this destruction. They each source beef from South America and our climate. Thanks to consumer demand, government and should work with their South American suppliers to help action, and nongovernmental organization (NGO) advocacy, change practices in order to ensure that the beef in their some companies and their suppliers have taken steps to ad- products is not causing deforestation.
    [Show full text]