DOCSLIB.ORG

Wilson County, NC Agricultural Development Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wilson County, NC Agricultural Development Plan Wilson County Agricultural Development Plan Sandy Maddox, Ed. D. December 2017 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 6 A Need for Action .......................................................................................................................................... 9 Overview of Wilson County ........................................................................................................................ 12 Wilson County Demographics ................................................................................................................. 13 Economy.................................................................................................................................................. 15 Cost of Services ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Infrastructure .......................................................................................................................................... 18 Education ................................................................................................................................................ 19 Natural Attributes ................................................................................................................................... 19 Soils ......................................................................................................................................................... 20 Forestry ................................................................................................................................................... 21 Wilson County: The State of Agriculture .................................................................................................... 22 Farmer Demographics ............................................................................................................................. 27 Farm and Forest Protection Programs ........................................................................................................ 29 Present-Use Value Tax Program ............................................................................................................. 29 Voluntary Agricultural Districts (VAD) .................................................................................................... 30 Enhanced Voluntary Agricultural Districts (EVAD) .................................................................................. 30 Conservation Easements ......................................................................................................................... 31 Term Conservation Easements ............................................................................................................... 32 Transfer of Development Rights ............................................................................................................. 32 Farm Transition Planning ........................................................................................................................ 32 Right-to-Farm Law................................................................................................................................... 33 N.C. Agricultural Development and Farmland Preservation Trust Fund ............................................... 33 Challenges, Opportunities and Trends: Survey and Interview Results ....................................................... 34 Agriculture Producer Analysis ................................................................................................................. 34 Agribusiness Survey and Interview Analysis ........................................................................................... 42 Non-Farm Resident Survey and Interview Analysis ................................................................................ 47 2 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................... 51 Recommendation One: ........................................................................................................................... 51 Recommendation Two: ........................................................................................................................... 54 Recommendation Three: ........................................................................................................................ 55 Recommendation Four: .......................................................................................................................... 57 Recommendation Five: ........................................................................................................................... 59 Recommendation Six: ............................................................................................................................. 60 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 62 References .................................................................................................................................................. 63 Appendixes .................................................................................................................................................. 66 Wilson County Producer Survey ............................................................................................................. 66 Wilson County Agribusiness Survey ........................................................................................................ 79 Wilson County Non-Farm Resident Survey ............................................................................................. 89 3 Acknowledgements The North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Agricultural Development and Farmland Preservation Trust Fund (ADFP) awarded a grant to the University of Mount Olive’s Lois G. Britt Agribusiness Center to create Agricultural Development Plans for Chowan, Currituck, Pasquotank, Perquimans and Wilson counties. ADFP promotes these plans as comprehensive guides for counties or governments to protect and preserve farms and forests, which contribute to the economy and quality of life in eastern North Carolina. This plan was written by Dr. Sandy Maddox. Dr. Maddox has an Ed. D. from N.C. State University and served with N.C. State University in both research and extension. She additionally served the NC Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services in the Research Stations Division until retirement in 2007. Since that time she has provided leadership to the Lois G. Britt Agribusiness Center at the University of Mount Olive and serves as chair for the Division of Agriculture at the university. The following agencies and individuals assisted with the development of this plan and the concurrent Cost of Community Services Study: North Carolina Cooperative Extension, Wilson County Center Wilson County Board of Commissioners Wilson County Manager North Carolina Forest Service Lois G. Britt Agribusiness Center, University of Mount Olive The citizens, farmers and agribusinesses of Wilson County 4 This project was funded by the North Carolina Agricultural Development and Farmland Preservation Trust Fund 5 Executive Summary Wilson County has a viable agricultural sector that is an important part of the total county fabric of life. The goal of this Agricultural Development Plan is to reflect the importance of agriculture and assess the opportunities, challenges and issues that are currently facing the industry. This plan provides recommendations, based on input from members of the agricultural community as well as Wilson County non-farm residents on ways to enhance agriculture, forestry, agribusiness and agritourism. Farmland is an irreplaceable natural resource, and the farmers who are stewards of this resource impact the economy and quality of life for all county residents. The economic impact of the agriculture sector in 2012 was 37.7 percent of the county‘s value added total income. The agricultural sector also accounts for 11.2 percent of Wilson County’s total employment (Walden, 2015). Wilson County has the resources, human and natural, to ensure that agriculture can prosper in the future. The impact of agriculture in Wilson County in 2012: *Agriculture and agribusiness contributed $2,514,082,618 in total value added income *Wilson County ranked 2nd in the state in sweet potato production *Wilson County ranked 5th in the state in flue-cured tobacco production *Wilson County ranked 4th in the state in nursery, greenhouse and floriculture *In total cash receipts from crops produced Wilson County ranked 4th in the state and 25th in the state for total cash receipts from agricultural products Wilson County is experiencing modest population growth, but the growth is occurring in a section of the county that results in competition of land uses. Seventy-seven percent of county farmers surveyed lacked sufficient land to expand or diversify their operations. Sixty-six percent indicated that competition for available land is a major concern for the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Increase Food Production Without Expanding Agricultural Land
    COURSE 2 Increase Food Production without Expanding Agricultural Land In addition to the demand-reduction measures addressed in Course 1, the world must boost the output of food on existing agricultural land. To approach the goal of net-zero expansion of agricultural land, improvements in crop and livestock productivity must exceed historical rates of yield gains. Chapter 10 assesses the land-use challenge, based on recent trend lines. Chapters 11–16 discuss possible ways to increase food production per hectare while adapting to climate change. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 10. Assessing the Challenge of Limiting Agricultural Land Expansion .............................147 Chapter 11. Menu Item: Increase Livestock and Pasture Productivity ........................................167 Chapter 12. Menu Item: Improve Crop Breeding to Boost Yields ..............................................179 Chapter 13. Menu Item: Improve Soil and Water Management ...............................................195 Chapter 14. Menu Item: Plant Existing Cropland More Frequently ........................................... 205 Chapter 15. Adapt to Climate Change ........................................................................... 209 Chapter 16. How Much Could Boosting Crop and Livestock Productivity Contribute to Closing the Land and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Gaps? .....................................................221 Creating a Sustainable Food Future 145 146 WRI.org CHAPTER 10 ASSESSING THE CHALLENGE OF LIMITING AGRICULTURAL LAND EXPANSION How hard will it be to stop net expansion of agricultural land? This chapter evaluates projections by other researchers of changes in land use and explains why we consider the most optimistic projections to be too optimistic. We discuss estimates of “yield gaps,” which attempt to measure the potential of farmers to increase yields given current crop varieties. Finally, we examine conflicting data about recent land-cover change and agricultural expansion to determine what they imply for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Causes and Consequences of Agricultural Expansion in Matopiba
    WORKING PAPER THE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF AGRICULTURAL EXPANSION IN MATOPIBA ARTHUR BRAGANÇA JULY 2016 THEME AGRICULTURE KEYWORDS AGRICULTURE, DEVELOPMENT, AGRICULTURAL FRONTIER The Land Use Initiative (INPUT – Iniciativa para o Uso da Terra) is a dedicated team of specialists who work at the forefront of how to increase environmental protection and food production. INPUT engages stakeholders in Brazil’s public and private sec¬tors and maps the challenges for a better management of its natural resources. Research conducted under INPUT is generously sup¬ported by the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF) through a grant to the Climate Policy Initiative. www.inputbrasil.org 3 The Causes and Consequences of Agricultural Expansion in Matopiba∗ Arthur Bragançay CPI July 2016 Abstract This paper examines the causes and consequences of the agricultural expansion in Matopiba (Brazil) over the past two decades. It documents that agricultural expansion in this region is concentrated in municipalities in the Cerrado biome. The estimates indicate that since the late 1990s agricultural output is increasing faster in municipal- ities in this biome when compared to municipalities outside the biome. Agricultural expansion led to increases in GDP per capita. The increase in GDP per capita is a re- sult of direct effects on the agricultural sector as well as indirect effects on services sector. The estimates also suggest that municipalities in the biome experienced larger gains in the access to durable consumer goods such as TV and refrigerator and in ba- sic infrastructure such as access to electric power. However, the results do not indicate differential changes in migration and human capital investments between Cerrado and non-Cerrado municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction Between Cultivation and Livestock Production in Semi-Arid
    13 The Interaction Between Cultivation and Livestock Production in Senmi-Arid Africa R.L. McCowN, G. HAVAAND, and C. DE HAAN 13.1 Introduction Although the majority of people in semi-arid Africa sustain themselves primarily by growing crops, this means of production is not pri:uticed by all, nor is it the sole means practiced by the majority. Because of inadequate rainfall and high evaporation rates, average crop yields are low, and the risk of crop failure Traditionally the inhabitants of is high. these regions have relied on domestic grazing animals to supplemenr their food supply. The ultimate degree of this embodied in pure pastoralism: dependence is however, semi-arid Afica has a wide variation, both in the nature and range of the degree of economic dependency on livestock. From the title of this chapter, the reader might reasonably expect a survey of current importance of livestock the in the agricut,iral regions of semi-arid Africa. even if we had the African experience But and relevant literatuie at our command attempt such a survey, it is to unlikely that this would be the most useful contribution. Instead, an attempt sort of is made to isolate the different types relationship or linkage that of characterize the interaction between cultivation livestock production and to consider and the conditions under which each linkage be expected to occur. Eight can cases from summer rainfall, semi-arid zones (Fig. 13.1) are described which of Africa demonstrate various configurations of existing production systems, linkages in together with the conditions under which developed. Finally, the trends they have in the forms of linkages from an evolutionary standpoint are considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Agricultural Management Systems on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Highly Simplified Dryland Landscapes
    sustainability Review Impacts of Agricultural Management Systems on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Highly Simplified Dryland Landscapes Subodh Adhikari 1,2,* , Arjun Adhikari 3,4, David K. Weaver 1 , Anton Bekkerman 5 and Fabian D. Menalled 1,* 1 Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173120, Bozeman, MT 59717-3120, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Nematology; 875 Perimeter Drive MS 2329, Moscow, ID 83844-2329, USA 3 Department of Ecology, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173460, Bozeman, MT 59717-3460, USA; [email protected] 4 Natural Resource Ecology and Management, 008C Agricultural Hall, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA 5 Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, P.O. Box 172920, Bozeman, MT 59717-3460, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.A.); [email protected] (F.D.M.) Received: 2 May 2019; Accepted: 9 June 2019; Published: 11 June 2019 Abstract: Covering about 40% of Earth’s land surface and sustaining at least 38% of global population, drylands are key crop and animal production regions with high economic and social values. However,land use changes associated with industrialized agricultural managements are threatening the sustainability of these systems. While previous studies assessing the impacts of agricultural management systems on biodiversity and their services focused on more diversified mesic landscapes, there is a dearth of such research
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Agricultural Expansion on Water Footprint in the Amazon Under Climate Change Scenarios
    Science of the Total Environment 569–570 (2016) 1159–1173 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Science of the Total Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv Impact of agricultural expansion on water footprint in the Amazon under climate change scenarios Laura Miguel Ayala a,⁎, Michiel van Eupen a, Guoping Zhang b, Marta Pérez-Soba a, Lucieta G. Martorano c, Leila S. Lisboa d, Norma E. Beltrao e a Alterra Wageningen University and Research Centre Alterra Wageningen University and Research, , Wageningen Campus, Building 101, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands b Water Footprint Network, International Water House, Bezuidenhoutseweg 2, 2594 AV, The Hague, The Netherlands c Embrapa Eastern Amazon, Trav. Dr. Enéas Pinheiro s/n° Caixa Postal, 48, CEP 66.095-100 Belém, Brazil d Esalq-São Paulo University, Av. Pádua Dias, 11 - Cx. Postal 9, Piracicaba CEP 13418-900, São Paulo, Brazil e University of Pará State, University of Para State – UEPA, Trav. Dr. Enéas Pinheiro 2626, CEP 66095-100 Belém, Brazil HIGHLIGHTS GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT • Agricultural expansion entails potential environmental impacts in nearby river basins. • Water Footprint Assessment analyses present & future watershed sustainabil- ity. • Green Water Scarcity: useful sustain- ability indicator accounting protection status. • Future soybean production impacts en- vironment beyond sustainability limits. article info abstract Article history: Agricultural expansion and intensification are main drivers of land-use change in Brazil. Soybean is the major Received 27 April 2016 crop under expansion in the area. Soybean production involves large amounts of water and fertiliser that act Received in revised form 23 June 2016 as sources of contamination with potentially negative impacts on adjacent water bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Revolution Andhra Pradesh
    Agriculture intensification population growth and cropland expansion: evidence from post- Green Revolution Andhra Pradesh Amarendra Pratap Singh1 and K Narayanan2 Abstract Increasing food demand due to rising population and urban growth may distort earth’s natural landscape unless technology driven intensification helps to spare land for alternative activities. Technological intervention in agriculture has not only increased agricultural yield which reflects land saving aspect of technology but it has also reduced fallow period substantially to increase effective supply of land which mirrors land augmenting aspect of technology. Here, we examine the impact of these two aspects of technology on cropland expansion for Andhra Pradesh using district level data over the period 1970-2009. Along with it, we also investigate the impact of growth in population, urban population and literate population on cropland expansion. We use a regression model based on the IPAT framework to measure the relative impact of affluence, population and technology on resource use. Results reject land sparing hypothesis in the state since the inception of new technology. However, population pressure on cropland seem to have declined. Other important result highlights the negative impact of urban growth on cropland expansion which implies that loss of prime cropland due to urban expansion cannot be refuted. Keywords: Land sparing, Land augmentation, Land saving, Jevons’ Paradox. 1. Introduction Population driven cropland expansion has been a major driver of land use change both at global as well as regional level (Ramankutty et al. 2002). Population-cropland debate goes back to Malthus (1798) who predicted that carrying capacity of earth is limited to satiate food demand of increasing human population.3 While Malthusian prediction has not been materialized yet; questions regarding feeding more and wealthier people using limited land resource are still 1 PhD Student, Department of humanities and Social Sciences, IIT Bombay.
    [Show full text]
  • Desertification and Agriculture
    BRIEFING Desertification and agriculture SUMMARY Desertification is a land degradation process that occurs in drylands. It affects the land's capacity to supply ecosystem services, such as producing food or hosting biodiversity, to mention the most well-known ones. Its drivers are related to both human activity and the climate, and depend on the specific context. More than 1 billion people in some 100 countries face some level of risk related to the effects of desertification. Climate change can further increase the risk of desertification for those regions of the world that may change into drylands for climatic reasons. Desertification is reversible, but that requires proper indicators to send out alerts about the potential risk of desertification while there is still time and scope for remedial action. However, issues related to the availability and comparability of data across various regions of the world pose big challenges when it comes to measuring and monitoring desertification processes. The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification and the UN sustainable development goals provide a global framework for assessing desertification. The 2018 World Atlas of Desertification introduced the concept of 'convergence of evidence' to identify areas where multiple pressures cause land change processes relevant to land degradation, of which desertification is a striking example. Desertification involves many environmental and socio-economic aspects. It has many causes and triggers many consequences. A major cause is unsustainable agriculture, a major consequence is the threat to food production. To fully comprehend this two-way relationship requires to understand how agriculture affects land quality, what risks land degradation poses for agricultural production and to what extent a change in agricultural practices can reverse the trend.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    69972 Options for Preparing a Sustainable Land Management (SLM) Program in Mali Consistent with TerrAfrica for World Bank Engagement at the Country Level Introduction Public Disclosure Authorized 1. Background and rationale: 1. One of the most environmentally vulnerable areas of the world is the drylands of sub-Saharan Africa, particularly the Sahel, the Horn of Africa and Southeast Africa. Mali, as with other dryland areas in this category, suffers from droughts approximately every 30 years. These droughts triple the number of people exposed to severe water scarcity at least once in every generation, leading to major food and health crisis. In general, dryland populations lag far behind the rest of the world in human well-being and development indicators. Similarly, the average infant mortality rate for dryland developing countries exceeds that for non-dryland countries by 23% or more. The human causes of degradation1 and desertification2 include direct factors such as land use (agricultural expansion in marginal areas, deforestation, overgrazing) and indirect factors (policy failures, population pressure, land tenure). The biophysical impacts of dessertification are regional and global climate change, impairment of carbon sequestation capacity, dust storms, siltation into rivers, downstream flooding, erosion gullies and dune formation. The social impacts are devestating- increasing poverty, decreased agricultural and silvicultural production and sometimes Public Disclosure Authorized malnutrition and/or death. 2. There are clear links between land degradation and poverty. Poverty is both a cause and an effect of land degradation. Poverty drives populations to exploit their environment unsustainably because of limited resources, poorly defined property rights and limited access to credit, which prevents them from investing resources into environmental management.
    [Show full text]
  • STUDIES in AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS No. 113
    Research Institute of Agricultural Economics Committee on Agricultural Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences STUDIES IN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS No. 113 AKI Budapest 2011 Studies in Agricultural Economics No. 113 The Studies in Agricultural Economics is a scientifi c journal published by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and the Research Institute of Agricultural Economics, Budapest. Papers of agricultural economics interpreted in a broad sense covering all fi elds of the subject includ- ing econometric, policy, marketing, fi nancial, social, rural development and environmental as- pects as well are published, subsequent to peer review and approval by the Editorial Board. Editorial Board Popp, József (Chairman) Szabó, Gábor (Editor-in-chief) Barnafi , László (Technical Editor) Lehota, József Bojnec, Štefan (Slovenia) Magda, Sándor Cruse, Richard M. (USA) Mészáros, Sándor Csáki, Csaba Mihók, Zsolt (Associate Editor) Fekete-Farkas, Mária Nábrádi, András Fehér, Alajos Nagy, Frigyes Fieldsend, Andrew Szakály, Zoltán Forgács, Csaba Szűcs, István Gorton, Matthew (United Kingdom) Tóth, József Heijman, W. J. M. (The Netherlands) Udovecz, Gábor Kapronczai, István Urfi , Péter Kiss, Judit Vizdák, Károly Lakner, Zoltán Manuscripts should be sent via e-mail to the Editor-in-chief ([email protected]). Instructions for the authors can be found on the website of the Research Institute of Agricultural Economics: http://www.aki.gov.hu HU ISSN 1418 2106 © Research Institute of Agricultural Economics 1463 Budapest, POB. 944. Hungary 2 Studies in Agricultural Economics No. 113 p. 47-66. (2011) The impact of crop protection on agricultural production Popp, József1 Hantos, Krisztina Abstract Chemical pesticides will continue to play a role in pest management for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Pollution from Agriculture: a Global Review
    LED BY Water pollution from agriculture: a global review Executive summary © FAO & IWMI, 2017 I7754EN/1/08.17 Water pollution from agriculture: a global review Executive summary by Javier Mateo-Sagasta (IWMI), Sara Marjani Zadeh (FAO) and Hugh Turral with contributions from Jacob Burke (formerly FAO) Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2017 and the International Water Management Institute on behalf of the Water Land and Ecosystems research program Colombo, 2017 FAO and IWMI encourage the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO and IWMI as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s and IWMI’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence- request or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/ publications) and can be purchased through [email protected]” © FAO and IWMI, 2017 Cover photograph: © Jim Holmes/IWMI Neil Palmer (IWMI) A GLOBAL WATER-QUALITY CRISIS AND THE ROLE OF AGRICULTURE Water pollution is a global challenge that has increased in both developed and developing countries, undermining economic growth as well as the physical and environmental health of billions of people.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: the Expansion of Intensive Beef Farming to the Brazilian Amazon
    1 Article type: Research Article 2 3 4 Title: The expansion of intensive beef farming to the Brazilian Amazon 5 6 Authors: Petterson Valea,b, Holly Gibbsa,c, Ricardo Valea,b, Matthew Christiea, Eduardo Florenced, 7 Jacob Mungera, Derquiane Sabainie 8 9 Affiliations: 10 aCenter for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE), University of Wisconsin-Madison, 11 1410 University Av., Madison, Wisconsin, 53705 12 bDepartment of Economics, University of São Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 13 14040-905, Brazil 14 cDepartment of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 550 N. Park st., Madison, WI, 53706 15 dLaboratory of Soils, State University of Mato Grosso, Rod. MT 208, km 147, Alta Floresta, MT, 16 78580-000, Brazil 17 eFederal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Acre, Rua Coronel José Galdino, 495, 18 Rio Branco, AC, 69900-640, Brazil 19 20 Corresponding author: Petterson Vale 21 Address: Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE), University of Wisconsin- 22 Madison, 1410 University Av., Madison, Wisconsin, 53705 23 Telephone: +1 608 6207983 24 E-mail: [email protected] 25 26 Keywords: feedlots, cattle, confinements, deforestation, intensification, productivity, Amazon, 27 Brazil 28 29 30 Acknowledgements 31 The authors are thankful to the informants and farmers who provided data for this research. Alcides Torres, 32 Ritaumaria Pereira, Paulo Barreto, Nathalie Walker, Francisco Beduschi, Raoni Rajão, Carlos Souza Jr., and 33 Kemel Kalif provided valuable feedback. Jens Engelman, Fanny Moffette, and Daniel Quinaud commented 34 on the manuscript. Scott Waldron, Jorge Funes, Shuo Li, Beichen Tian, Yu Wu, and Iliyas Nurseitov helped 35 with data sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Cattle, Cleared Forests, and Climate Change
    Cattle, Cleared Forests, and Climate Change Don Anair Amine Mahmassani Scoring America’s Top Brands on Their Deforestation-Free Beef Commitments and Practices July 2013 Each year, tropical forests are destroyed to clear land that is ultimately used for beef production, making beef the largest driver of tropical deforestation globally. South America’s forests are “ground zero” for beef-driven deforestation. Here, ranchers clear tropical forests and other ecosystems that its beef is truly deforestation-free. Second, each of these such as native grasslands and woodlands to create pastures, companies with a commitment focuses implementation only in the process releasing enormous amounts of heat-trapping on the Brazilian Amazon, even though many other ecosys- gases, destroying the habitat of wildlife such as jaguars and tems are also at risk. All companies also lack adequate trans- sloths, and encroaching on the homes of vulnerable indige- parency, which leaves consumers and investors in the dark nous peoples. about whether companies are carefully monitoring and The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) evaluated evaluating their supply chains for tropical deforestation. 13 consumer goods companies in the fast food, retail, and Beef can be produced without deforestation. The compa- food manufacturing sectors that have the power to help stop nies scored in this report have the power to help save forests this destruction. They each source beef from South America and our climate. Thanks to consumer demand, government and should work with their South American suppliers to help action, and nongovernmental organization (NGO) advocacy, change practices in order to ensure that the beef in their some companies and their suppliers have taken steps to ad- products is not causing deforestation.
    [Show full text]