This is a repository copy of The classical commentary in Renaissance France: bilingual, mixed-language, and translated editions. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/119795/ Version: Published Version Article: White, P orcid.org/0000-0001-6200-5489 (2018) The classical commentary in Renaissance France: bilingual, mixed-language, and translated editions. Renaissance and Reformation, 41 (2). pp. 7-36. ISSN 0034-429X Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing
[email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.
[email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ he Classical Commentary in Renaissance France: Bilingual, Mixed-Language, and Translated Editions paul white University of Leeds his article analyzes the dynamic interactions of Latin and the vernacular in commentary editions of the Latin classics printed in France before 1600, addressing questions of readership, intended uses, and actual uses. Beginning with the output of Antoine Vérard, it explores the diferent possibilities for translating Latin commentaries in the early decades of French printing, and the reconigurations of layout and commentary discourse between languages.