University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Volume 26 1992 Deconstructing Los Angeles or a Secret Fax from Magritte Regarding Postliterate Legal Reasoning: A Critique of Legal Education C. Garrison Lepow Loyola University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr Part of the Legal Education Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation C. G. Lepow, Deconstructing Los Angeles or a Secret Fax from Magritte Regarding Postliterate Legal Reasoning: A Critique of Legal Education, 26 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 69 (1992). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol26/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. DECONSTRUCTING LOS ANGELES OR A SECRET FAX FROM MAGRITTE REGARDING POSTLITERATE LEGAL REASONING: A CRITIQUE OF LEGAL EDUCATION C. Garrison Lepow* Not only is it clear that most law students become impatient at some point during their three years of formal education, but it is clear also that how students learn the law is more the cause of their impatience than what they learn.' Moreover, others besides law students may be entitled to challenge the style of education that manufactures a lawyer-culture. If one assumes for the sake of argument that the intellectual processes of lawyers, and consequently their values, differ from those of their society, this fact does not explain the difference between legal thinking and regular thinking, or explain why there should not be harmony between the two.