Design of Training Systems, Phase I Final Report, Volume I of II
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 089 778 IR 000 503 AUTHOR Bellamy, Harold J.; And Others TITLE Design of Training Systems, Phase I Final Report, Volume I of II. INSTITUTION Naval Training Equipment Center, Orlando, Fla. Training Analysis and Evaluation Group. REPORT NO IBM-FSO-ESC-73-535-005; NAVTRADQUIPCEN-TAEG-12-1-v-1 PUB DATE Dec 73 NOTE 468p.; For related documents see IR 000 502 and IR' 000 504 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.75 HC- $22.20 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS Computer Oriented Programs; *Computers; *Educational Programs; *Instructional Design; *Instructional Systems; Management; Management Systems; *Mathematical Models; *Military Training; Models; Program Descriptions IDENTIFIERS *Design of Training Systems; DOTS; Naval Education and Training System; NETS; United States Navy, ABSTRACT Full details are presented on Phase I of the three-stage project "Design of Training Systems" (DOTS). A functional descriptive model of the current Naval Education and Training System (NETS) is provided, along with idealized concepts oriented toward a 1980 time frame. Technological gaps and problem areas are noted, but no organizational elements arc identified since it is specified that the prime areas of interest are the functions performed. Finally, a rationale is offered for the selection of candidate mathematical models which will be developed in Phase II of the project for the purpose of assisting training managers with planning and decision-making related to the management of training programs. (Author) TRAINING ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION GROUP TAEG REPOR1 DESIGN OF TRAINING SYSTEMS NO 12-1 PHASE I REPORT Volume I FOCUS ON THE TRAINED MAN U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH EDUCATION IL WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION 1HIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO DuCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGAN,EAT.ON OR !GIN ACING IT POINTS 01 VIEW UN OPLwONS STATED DO 40' NECESSAR,t V RI PRI- SENT OFt,CiAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE 01 FOLICAVON POSITION ON POLICY 110 t PUBLIC RELEASE; IS UNLIMITED. DECEMBER 1973 0 A ' Technical Reports TAM REPORT NO. 12-1 DESIGN OF TRAINING SYSTEMS PHASE I REPORT ABSTRACT This report presents a functional descriptive model of the current Naval Education and Training System and idealized concepts oriented toward a 1980 time frame.While technological gaps and problem areas are presented, no organizational elements are specified, since the prime areas of interest are the functions performed. In addition, the rationale for selection of candidate mathematical models to be developed in Phase II is given. Strategic working assumptions for the 1980's are presented in Volume 2 of this report. The study was performed by IBM for the Training Analysis and Evaluation Group of the Naval Training Equipment Center, Orlando, Florida (Contract No. N61339-73-C-0097). AIMI=N11111, ,pm.11...WIENINOW.11., Reproduction of this publication in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. fr TAEG REPORT NO. 12-1 FOREWORD This report presents Phase I of a three-phase project called "Design of Training Systems," undertaken in consonance with the requirements of Advanced Development Objective 43-03X, "Education and Training." One of the major objectives of the project is to develop tools for the effective management of training organizations. The tools will include mathematical models which will be the basis for computer simulation of significant portions/subsystems of the training system. This phase is a required pre- lude to Phase II which involves the development of mathematical models and their validation. Phase III covers the verification of the models which have been developed. Sincere thanks is expressed for the close cooperation of all elements of the Naval Education and Training System both within and outside the Naval Education and Training Command. This analysis would not have been possible without such assistance. Principal investigators for this study were Dr. A. Elkin and Mr. L. Duffy who performed the basic analysis and developed the flows and supporting discussion of Section VI. The parts of the report dealing with evalua- tion of candidate models were developed by Mr. H. Bellamy, Mr. R. Yanko, and Mr. S. Stasak (part-time). The strategic assumptions contained in the Appendix (Volume 2) were developed by Mr.R. Hallman supported by the IBM Advisory Group. The Training Analysis and Evaluation Group project team complemented the contracted effort by establishing organizational interfaces and by pro- viding guidance. TAEG REPORT NO. 12-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 SECTION PAGE FOREWORD I. INTRODUCTION A. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM I-1 8. SIGNIFICANT EARLY DOCUMENTS I-1 1. Request for Proposals I-1 2. Management Support Plan 1-2 II. BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT A. ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE (ADO) 43-03X . II-1 B. THE DOTS PROJECT II-1 III. WORKING CONCEPTS A. EDUCATION /TRAINING AS A SYSTEM III-1 1. Functional vs. Organizational Approach . 111-2 2. Bounds/Interfaces of the System 111-2 B. ROLE OF NAVAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND . 111-7 IV. OVERVIEW OF THE PHASES A. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE IV-1 B. PHASE I OVERVIEW IV-1 1. Objectives IV-1 2. General Comments IV-2 C. PHASE Ii OVERVIEW IV-2 1. Objectives IV-2 2. General Comments IV-3 TAEG REPORT NO. 12-1 SECTION PAGE D. PHASE III OVERVIEW IV-3 1, Objectives ---- IV-3 2. General Comments --1V-3 V. INTRODUCTION TO PHASE I A. FUNCTIONAL FLOW OF CURRENT SYSTEM V-1 B. IDEALIZED APPROACH V-1 C. ASSUMPTIONS AND VARIABLES V-1 D. TECHNOLOGICAL DATA BASE V-1 E. CANDIDATE MODEL LIST V-2 VI. DESCRIPTIVE FUNCTIONAL MODEL OF THE NAVAL EDUCATION AND MINING SYSTEM A. INTRODUCTION VI-1 B. OBJECTIVES VI-1 1. Preparation of a Descriptive Functional Model VI-1 2. Limiting the Scope of Investigation to a Manageable Size VI-1 3. Delineating Gaps and Problems in the Current System VI-2 4. Highlighting Areas/Approaches Which Could be Improved VI-2 C. ANALYTICAL APPROACH VI-2 1. Field Visits VI-2 2. Review of Naval Instructions, Reports, and Miscellaneous Documentation VI-4 3. Functional Flows VI-4 D. GENERALIZED FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS OF NAVAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING VI-7 1. Overview of the Current System VI-7 iv TAEG REPORT NO. 12-1 SECTION PAGE 2. Strategic Working Assumptions Expected to Influence the Education and Training System of the 1980's VI-16 3. Overview of the Idealized System VI-22 E. PRIMARY FUNCTIONS OF THE NAVAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING SYSTEM VI-25 1. Function 1.0 Develop Training Requirements . VI-25 2. Function 2.0 Coordinate and Control Training VI-47 3. Function 3.0 Analyze and Plan Training . VI-75 4. Function 4.0Implement Training . VI-107 5. Function 5.0 Evaluate Performance (Feedback). VI-179 6. Function 6.0Manage Training Resources . VI-237 7. Function 7.0Perform Training Research . VI-345 8. Function 8.0Support Training VI-365 F. DISCUSSION VI-405 VII. SELECTION AND EVALUATION OF CANDIDATE MODELS A. INTRODUCTION B. GENERAL APPROACH C. CANDIDATE MODELING AREA DESCRIPTIONS 1. Training System Capabilities/Requirements . VII-4 2. Training Resource Allocations VII-5 3. Management of Congressional AOB Ceilings . VII-5 4. Budget Analysis Model VII-5 5. School Planning Model VII-5 6. Aviation Training Management/Planning System VII-6 7. Optimal School Location Model . VII -6 8. Educational Technology Evaluation Model . VII -6 9. Course Costing Model VII-7 10. Fleet Training Requirements Projection Model VII-7 11. Quota Generation Model VII-7 12. Career Path Model VII -8 13. Training Process Flow Models VII-8 14. Management of Fixed Resources Model VII-9 15. Schoolhouse Training vs Off-Site Training . VII-9 16. Minimum Level of Training VII-10 17. Training/Billet Assignment System for Students Completing Individualized Instruction Curriculum VII-10 TAEG REPORT NO. 12-1 SECTION PAGE 18. Permanent Change of Station (PCS)/ Temporary Additional Duty (TAB) Budget Impact on Training VII-10 19. Training Objective Analysis VII-10 20. NEC Manpower Overage VII-11 21. Physics of Learning VII-11 D. CANDIDATE SELECTION CRITERIA VII-11 1. Feasibility VII-11 2. Practicality VII-12 3. Training Orientation VII-12 CRITERIA DESCRIPTIONS VII-12 1. Design of Training System Project Definition . VII-12 2. Model Application Time Span VII-13 3. Benefit Potential ......... VII-13 4. Organizational Level VII-13 5. Technique Availability VII-14 6. Data Base Availability VII-14 7. Projected Model Development Effort VII-14 8. Projected Model Application/Verification Effort VII-14 9. Model Objective VII-15 F. CANDIDATE EVALUATION VII -15 G. DESCRIPTION OF SELECTED MODELS VII-28 1. Educational Technology Evaluation Model . VII-28 2. Training Process Flow VII-30 3. System Capabilities/Requirements and Resources Models VII-31 4. Model Interaction VII-32 5. User Interface VII-32 vi TAEG REPORT NO. 12-1 LIST OF FIGURES NOTE: Functional flows are listed within each functional section-- under (b.) Description. FIGURE NO. TITLE PAGE 1-1 Design of Training Systems Project Structure . 1-3 1-2 IBM Study Team 1-4 1-3 Project Office Team 1-5 III -1 Conceptual Model of the Naval Education and Training System 111-3 111-2 Top Level Command Structure 111-5 111-3 Organizational Relationships Between the Fleet and the Single Naval Education and Training Command . 111-6 111-4 CNET Functional Commands 111-8 VI-0.0 Functional Flow Symbology VI-8 VI-0.1 Functional Flow Symbology V1-9 V1-0.2 Naval Education and Training System (Information and Control) VI-12 VI-0.3 Naval Education and Training System (Personnel/ Training Flow) VI-13 VI 1.2.6 Pre-Analyze Training Needs (Idealized) VI-45 VI 3.6 Conceptual Phase (Phase I) of Ship Life Cycle . VI-101 VI 3.7 Validation Phase (Phase II) of Ship Life Cycle .