Jonathan Lasker's Dramatis Personae

“Jonathan Lasker’s Dramatis Personae.” In Jonathan Lasker: Paintings, Drawings, Studies. Madrid: Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía in co-production with K20 Kunstsammlung Nordrhein-Westfalen, Düsseldorf, 2003; pp. 110-119. Text © Robert Hobbs Robert Hobbs Jonathan Laskers Dramatis Personae After attending Queens College for less than a year in the artists as Allan Kaprow, Nam June Paik., John Baldessari, late 1960s, Jonathan Lasker quit school to play bass guitar Michael Asher, and Douglas Huebler. The school was also and blues harmonica with rock bands. At age twenty-two heir to a relatively recent California Neo-Dadaist tradi this quest took him to Europe for four years, first to Eng tion that curator Walter Hopps inaugurated in 1963 when 110 land, where he worked with a couple of short-lived he staged a full-scale, highly celebrated Marcel Duchamp groups, and then to Germany, where he was employed retrospective at the Pasadena Museum of Art. The pri intermittently as a longshoreman and a house painter. He mary conduits between this particular exhibition and the then came to grips with what he calls his "lack of success Institute's pedagogy were the Californians Baldessari and as a musician" and decided to maximize his strengths, Asher. Lasker called the latter "the Grand Inquisitor which included a long-term fascination with art, coupled against painting," since he assumed personal responsibi with "excellent eye-hand coordination," by becoming a lity for eradicating the last vestiges of modernist senti painter. 1 He returned to New York, where he became an ments in students' works. Less programmatic in his tea assistant buyer for an organization that pre-bought items ching, New Yorker Douglas Huebler was also more open for discount chains and enrolled in night courses at the to traditional painting, as certainly were such guest in School of Visual Arts (SVA) from 1975 to 1977. Toward structors as New Image painter Susan Rothenberg and the end of his schooling there, Lasker took courses with Pop artist Richard Artschwager, who were both teaching Minimalist David Smythe and made collages inspired by during the spring and fall of 1977, when Lasker was a stu Robert Rauschenberg's work. From other SVA students, dent at CaiArts. he learned that the California Institute of the Arts in Even with their sympathetic approach, Lasker was Valencia (CaiArts) had an excellent program in studio art. still encouraged, during his brief time at the school, to 1 Robert Hobbs, "Interview with He applied and was accepted there, without realizing the put together a convincing response to Conceptual art's Jonathan Lasker," New York City, enormous challenges that faced any painter venturing into derogation of painting. This effort has led to a body of February 12, 2003, unpublished inter this bastion of West Coast Conceptualism. palmary work that represents a major contribution to view. Other references to Lasker's Well funded by Disney Studios in the 1960s, CaiArts the dialogue of late twentieth-century art at a time when early years and interests are from statements made by the artist during was able to bankroll a cutting-edge arts program that painting was being assailed as irrelevant and overly pre this interview. could boast such Happenings, Fluxus, and Conceptual cious. The urgency of this type of response became the subject of public discussion only a few years after Lasker aesthetic activity at the center of the marketplace, where had already surmounted a number of painting's most it can cause the most trouble. For, as too many concep noted limitations. The periodical October published Craig tual artists discovered, art made on the peripheries of Owens's "The Allegorical Impulse: Toward a Theory of the market remains marginal."4 Postmodernism" in 1980 and Douglas Crimp's "The End Although Lawson takes great liberties with time of Painting" the following year.2 Artforum dedicated space when he links Picasso's Cubism with Derrida's decon to Thomas Lawson's highly topical "Last Exit: Painting" struction, his point about the potential radicalness of during this same time.3 The first article built a convincing painting is apropos, since it advocates fomenting a revolu case for the relevancy of photo-based art; the second tion from within the most normative and unsuspected presented Daniel Buren's painting as among the most realm of the art world, painting. And this is the tactic that advanced work because of its contextual orientation; and Lasker in fact employed when he chose to rebut his the third proposed that painting's continued viability had teachers and peers at CaiArts, using painting as both his been won by a few individuals, including its author, as a chief weapon and rhetorical platform. This essay will look result of a desperate need to combat vehement assaults at the beginnings of this carefully considered rebuttal from all sides. Lawson predicted that painting would suc with the express intention of employing it to illuminate ceed because it was the most subversive and ironic way crucial aspects of Lasker's overall reuvre. of working after a decade of Conceptual art's hegemony. Jonathan Lasker was not the only remarkable painter Ill Although his overall remarks did not apply to Lasker, to come out of the CaiArts program. Eric Fischl and who had characterized direct pastiche and blatant irony David Salle preceded him by a few years, and the some as far too easy routes, the following statement in "Last time painter Mike Kelley was a classmate. But among his Exit: Painting" could be considered a particularly apt ret generation, he is the only one to formulate in abstract rospective insight into his modus operandi: "But by re painterly terms a clear response to Conceptual art's pro sorting to subterfuge, using an unsuspecting vehicle as vocations. In fact, outside Great Britain's Art & Language camouflage, the radical artist can manipulate the viewer's members, who later found painting to be a way to extend 2 Craig Owens, "The Allegorical Impulse: Toward a Theory of faith to dislodge his or her certainty. The intention of their special brand of Conceptual art, Lasker is one of Postmodernism," October, no. 12 that artist must therefore be to unsettle conventional the few late twentieth-century artists to discover a feasi (Spring 1980), pp. 67-86, and no. 13 thought from within, to cast doubt on the normalized ble way to maintain a viable painterly position without (Summer 1980). pp. S9-80; rpt. in perception of the 'natural,' by destabilizing the means affiliating it with either modernism or Conceptualism. Brian Wallis, ed., Art After Modernism: Rethinking Representation, Documen used to represent it, even in the knowledge that this, too, In the 1960s and 1970s painting had served New York tary Sources in Contemporary Art must ultimately lead to certain defeat. More com Conceptual artist Joseph Kosuth as a convenient straw (New York: New Museum of pelling, because more perverse, is the idea of tackling the figure in his ongoing campaign to legitimatize his new way Contemporary Art. in association problem with what appears to be the least suitable vehi of working. This new mode replaced the inherited assump with David R. Godine, Boston, 1984). pp. 203-35. Douglas Crimp. "The End cle available, painting. It is perfect camouflage, and it must tion of art's long-heralded presence, i.e., its ontology, of Painting," October, no. 16 (Spring be remembered that Picasso considered Cubism and with a keen interest in its epistemology. Partially inherit 1981). pp. 69-86. camouflage to be one and the same, a device of misrepre ed from Duchamp, this attitude was applied even more 3 Thomas Lawson, "Last Exit: Painting," Artforum 20. no. 2 sentation, a deconstructive tool desig-ned to undermine concertedly against art's residual materiality than this Da (October 1981 ). pp. 40-47; rpt. in the certainty of appearances. The appropriation of paint daist figure had anticipated, so that its status as an object Wallis, Art After Modernism. ing as a subversive method allows one to place critical was held suspect even though it was never entirely un- 4 Lawson in Wallis, pp. 162-63. dermined. Kosuth argued that painters were condemned special purview by showing how it affects the way that art to be mere artisans because at the outset they had ac is perceived. In the fall of 1977, for example, he persuad cepted this medium as a given category without question ed the staff of three neighboring institutions-the Fort ing its means and limits. Instead of making "art investiga Worth Art Museum, the Amon Carter, and the Kimbell tions"-Kosuth's term for his own work-painters were -to use for a three-week period the same parking lot content with its "presentation" and became decorators for all their service and staff vehicles. His tactic resulted of "na"lve art forms" rather than philosophers.5 Kosuth in new acquaintances and meaningful daily interactions elaborates on the rigors of Conceptual art, which is able between the staff of the three museums. In addition, he to stratify boundaries by working both within as well as noted: "Some of the staff members informed me that outside the limits of such established media as painting: they had changed their habit of entering or leaving the "Rather than presenting an inward-turning world, as building ... and that by using the main entrance they painting had, I saw this new work doing quite the oppo found they were paying more attention to the presence site: it began the process of looking outward, making the of the collection in the museum. One curator, for exam context important.

Load more