A Critical Edition of John Fletcher's Comedy: Monsieur Thomas Or

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Critical Edition of John Fletcher's Comedy: Monsieur Thomas Or Routledge Revivals A Critical Edition of John Fletcher’s Comedy A Critical Edition of John Fletcher’s Comedy Monsieur Thomas or Father’s Own Son Edited by Nanette Cleri Clinch The Renaissance Imagination Volume 25 First published in 1987 by Garland Publishing, Inc. This edition first published in 2018 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN and by Routledge 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 1987 by Taylor & Francis All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Publisher’s Note The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint but points out that some imperfections in the original copies may be apparent. Disclaimer The publisher has made every effort to trace copyright holders and welcomes correspondence from those they have been unable to contact. A Library of Congress record exists under ISBN: ISBN 13: 978-0-367-19172-6 (hbk) ISBN 13: 978-0-429-20088-5 (ebk) The Renaissance Imagination Important Literary and Theatrical Texts from the Late Middle Ages through the Seventeenth Century Stephen Orgel E ditor Volumes in the Series 1. Arte of Rhetorique by Thomas 8. Greene's Tu Quoque Or, The Cittie Wilson Gallant byj. Cooke edited by Thomas J. Derrick A critical edition 2. An Enterlude Called Lusty edited by Alan J. Berman Iuuentus 9. A Critical Edition of I Sir John by R. Wever Oldcastle An old-spelling critical edition edited, with an introduction, edited by Helen Scarborough by Jonathan Rittenhouse Thomas 10. The Tudor Interludes: Nice 3. The True Tragicomedy Formerly Wanton and Impatient Poverty Acted at Court. A Play by Francis edited by Leonard Tennenhouse Osborne Transcribed from the 11. Pageants and Entertainments of Manuscript in the British Library Anthony Munday by John Pitcher and Lois Potter A critical edition edited, with an introduction, edited by David M. Bergeron by Lois Potter 12. The Fancies, Chast and Noble by J. 4. The Comedies of John Crowne Ford A critical edition A critical edition edited, with Prolegomena, edited by Dominick J. Hart by B. J. McMullin 13. Buckingham: Public and Private 5. The Pearl Poems: An Omnibus Man. The Prose, Poems and Edition. Commonplace Book of George Vol. 1: Pearl and Cleanness Villiers, Second Duke of edited by William Vantuono Buckingham (1628-1687) 6. The Pearl Poems: An Omnibus edited by Christine Phipps Edition. Vol. 2: Patience and Sir 14. The Pastyme of People and A New Gawain and the Green Knight Boke of Purgatory by J. Rastell, edited by William Vantuono with a facsimile of The Pastyme 7. The Swisser by Arthur Wilson A critical edition edited by Linda V. Itzoe edited by Albert J. Geritz 15. The Passions of the Mind in 26. The Prose of Fulke Greville, Lord General Brooke by Thomas Wright edited by Mark Caldwell A critical edition 27. A Critical Edition of The Play of the edited by William Webster Wether by John Heywood Newbold edited by Vicki Knudsen 16. Thomas Heywoods Pageants Robinson A critical edition 28. A Critical Edition of The Isle of edited by David M. Bergeron Ladies 17. The Obstinate Lady by Aston edited by Vincent Daly Cokayne 29. A Contextual Study and Modem- edited by Catherine M. Shaw Spelling Edition of Mucedorus 18. A Critical Old Spelling of the edited by Arvin H. Jupin Works of Edward Sharpham 30. A Critical Edition of Ferdinando edited by Christopher G. Petter Parkhurst’s Ignoramus, The 19. Sicily and Naples, Or, the Fatall Academical-Lawyer Union. edited by E.EJ. Tucker A Tragoedy by S. Harding 31. A Critical Edition of Alexander edited by Joan Warthling Roberts Ross’s 1647 Mystagogus Poeticus, 20. The Aeneid of Thomas Phaer and or The Muses Interpreter Thomas Twyne edited by John R. Glenn A critical edition introducing 32. A Critical Edition of Thomas Renaissance metrical typography Salter’s The Mirrhor of Modestie edited by Steven Lally edited by Janis Butler Holm 21. A Critical Edition of Abraham 33. An Old-Spelling Critical Edition of Cowley’s Cutter of Coleman Street James Shirley’s The Example edited by Darlene Johnson edited by William E Jones Gravett 34. Stuart Academic Drama: Three 22. A Critical Edition of Abraham University Plays Cowley’s Davideis edited by David L. Russell edited by Gayle Shadduck 35. A Critical Edition of George 23. An Old-Spelling Critical Edition of Whetstone’s 1582 An Heptameron William Davenant’s The Platonic of Civill Discourses Lovers edited by Diana Shklanka edited by Wendell W. Broom, Jr. 36. An Edition of Robert Wilson’s 24. A Critical Edition of John Three Ladies of London and Three Fletcher’s The Humorous Lords and Three Ladies of London Lieutenant edited by H.S.D. Mithal edited by Philip Oxley 37. The School of Cyrus: William 25. A Critical Edition of John Barker’s 1567 Translation of Fletcher’s Comedy Monsieur Xenophon’s Cyropaedeia (The Thomas or Father's Own Son Education of Cyrus) edited by Nanette Cleri Clinch edited by James Tatum A Critical Edition of John Fletcher’s Comedy MONSIEUR THOMAS OR FATHER’S OWN SON edited by Nanette Cleri Clinch The Renaissance Imagination Volume 25 GARLAND PUBLISHING, INC. NEW YORK & LONDON 1987 © 1987 Nanette Cleri Clinch All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Fletcher, John, 1579-1625. A critical edition of John Fletcher’s comedy, Monsieur Thomas, or, Father’s own son. (The Renaissance imagination ; v. 25) Bibliography: p. I. Clinch, Nanette Cleri, 1951- . II. Title. III. Title: Monsieur Thomas. IV. Series. PR2507.M6 1987 822'.3 87-7407 ISBN 0-8240-8404-7 Printed on acid-free, 250-year-life paper Manufactured in the United States of America A CRITICAL EDITION OF JOHN FLETCHER*S COMEDY MONSIEUR THOMAS, OR FATHER * S OWN SON by Nanette Cleri Clinch A THESIS SUBMITTED IN CONFORMITY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO ABSTRACT This edition of John Fletcher's comedy Monsieur Thomas (1614-17) has been prepared in accordance with the principles established for the Revels series of plays. The text is modernized in spelling and punctu- ation. Four copies of the first quarto of 1639» the copy-text for this edition, and one copy of the second quarto, a post-Restoration re-issue, have been collated, as well as the text in the second Folio of Beaumont and Fletcher's plays (1679)—the play did not appear in the first Folio of 1647—and all subsequent editions of the play. A substantial commentary is included. The intro- duction provides a full discussion of the nature of the copy-text; the question of authorial interference from Richard Brome, the p la y 's f i r s t e d ito r; sources; date of composition; criticism; stage-history; and some brief comments on F le tc h e r's v e r s if ic a tio n . The copy for the first quarto, fairly free from errors, was probably Fletcher's 'foul papers', or a transcription from them. The play appears in verse in all editions, and the first quarto is divided, almost consistently, into acts and scenes, with major mis- numbering occuring in one section near the end of the play. The misnumbering and other aspects of the compo- sition and printing of the quarto (discussed in detail in three appendices) give additional weight to the pos- sibility of minor alterations introduced by Brome. The second quarto differs only in that it displays a dif- ferent title on a cancel-leaf title-page: Fathers own Son, which may simply have been Fletcher's subtitle for Monsieur Thomas. The saturnalian comedy has a double-plot that turns on the themes of friendship and regeneration. The tri- angular love-situation in the main plot is based on 'L’Histoire de Celide'e, Thamire et Calidon' in Part II of Honore/ d'Urfe/'s pastoral romance L'Astree (l6l0). But the whorl of intrigues—ranging from the joyous re- covery of a lost son to the absurdities caused by mis- taken identities—owes much to morality plays, romances, fo lk lo re and so c ia l customs. In a London s e ttin g , fanciful and realistic elements are mixed, and serious incidents are counterpointed by farcical situations. Fletcher's innovative talents are discernable through- out. Francisco's bout with love-melancholy becomes a springboard for a satire on contemporary medical prac- tices. Thomas' exposure to travel transforms him into an unusually demure prodigal son, seemingly opposed to his eccentric father's raucous behaviour. Of all the ch aracters in the comedy, Thomas is the most fa sc in a tin g . In his several roles as doctor, devilish madcap and enamoured clown, Thomas functions, on one level, as a p h allic symbol, and bears comparison with the Tommy, or Fool, of the British mummers' plays. The relationship between Monsieur Thomas and the mummers' plays is con- sequently discussed at length and shown to be central to our understanding of the play. This neglected comedy, which apparently fa ile d to please its first audience, inspired weak adaptations. One modern production a t the U niversity of Toronto met with modest success. The purpose of this edition is to revive an interest in a play where Fletcher's original treatment of dramatic conventions, literary devices, social trends and local traditions is displayed to full advantage.
Recommended publications
  • 6 X 10.Long New.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-71397-9 - How to Read a Shakespearean Play Text Eugene Giddens Index More information Index accidental, 32, 44, 47, 100, 101, 116, 144 Brown, Arthur, 105, 149 act and scene divisions, 77–80 Brown, John Russell, 148, 150 advertisements, 12, 97 Buc, Sir George, 17 Alcorn, Thomas, 35 Burbage, Richard, 27 Allde, Edward, 40, 134 Burre, Walter, 61 Arden Shakespeare, 4, 50, 102, 112, 117, 149, 154, Burt, Richard, 13, 18 159, 160, 161, 164, 165, 167 Butter, Nathaniel, 62 arguments, 75 Armin, Robert, 27 Cambises, 72 Aspley, William, 27, 61, 97 Cambridge School Shakespeare, 167 Cambridge University Library, 143 bad quartos, 23–5, 49 Campion, Thomas Barton, Anne, 163 Masque at Lord Hay’s Marriage, 72 Bate, Jonathan, 109, 112, 154, 163, 167 Capell, Edward, 161 Beaumont, Francis, 9, 12, 18, 23, 33, 35, 39, 41, capitalisation, 81, 85, 88, 93, 107, 140 66, 69, 147, 150, 152 Carson, Christie, 171 Beaumont, Francis and John Fletcher Carson, Neil, 8, 9, 10, 35 Wild Goose Chase, 18 casting off, 41, 42, 89, 90, 133, 134 Beaumont, Francis, John Fletcher, and Philip catchwords, 96, 124–5, 151 Massinger chainlines, 137–8 Beggar’s Bush, 62 Chamberlain’s Men, 27, 29, 58 Benson, John, 19 Chapman, George, 9, 65 Berger, Thomas L., 160 Chettle, Henry, 14, 18 Bertram, Paul, 102 Clare, Janet, 16, 17 Best, Michael, 170 collation, 121–3 beta radiography, 135 collation line, 151, 160–4 Bevington, David, 81, 151, 158, 162, 164 collation, stop-press correction, 142–5 Blackfriars Theatre, 27 colophons, 97 black-letter, 86 composing stick, 43, 133 Blayney, Peter W.
    [Show full text]
  • Performing Multilingualism on the Caroline Stage in the Plays of Richard Brome
    Performing Multilingualism on the Caroline Stage in the Plays of Richard Brome Performing Multilingualism on the Caroline Stage in the Plays of Richard Brome By Cristina Paravano Performing Multilingualism on the Caroline Stage in the Plays of Richard Brome By Cristina Paravano This book first published 2018 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2018 by Cristina Paravano All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-0593-6 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-0593-3 CONTENTS Acknowledgments ..................................................................................... vii Quotations, Abbreviations and Conventions .............................................. ix Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Through the Prism of Multilingualism Chapter One ............................................................................................... 19 ‟There’s too much French in town”: The New Academy and The Demoiselle Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 37 ‟Simile non est idem”: The City Wit and
    [Show full text]
  • A Dramaturgical Study of Merrythought's Songs in the Knight
    Early Theatre 12.2 (2009) Katrine K. Wong A Dramaturgical Study of Merrythought’s Songs in The Knight of the Burning Pestle ‘Let him stay at home and sing for his dinner’, advises Mistress Merrythought about her highly musical husband, Old Merrythought, who believes in achiev- ing mirth and health through much singing, a good portion of which has the pretext of conviviality, in particular, drinking.1 The philosophy embedded in Old Merrythought’s sundry songs in Francis Beaumont’s The Knight of the Burning Pestle (c 1607)2 shows the coexistence of orderliness and disor- derliness related to music, a duality pervasive in the use of music in English Renaissance drama. Early modern English culture attached a wide range of associations to music; various pairs of ideological dichotomies can be identi- fied, such as sublimation and corruption of the soul, love and lust, masculin- ity and femininity, and destruction and restoration of sanity.3 In this essay, I first provide a brief contextual background of the perception and practice of music, and illustrate with a few episodes from Elizabethan and Jacobean plays the diversity of connotations carried by music as well as how music can be incorporated into various types of dramatic scenarios.4 These examples reflect the general musical landscape of Renaissance drama. I then evaluate the dramaturgical characteristics of Merrythought’s songs in relation to the contemporary cultural and dramatic milieux. Views on Music The negotiation between the divine and the corrupting in music has always been an important part of the social and philosophical understanding of the art since classical times.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge Companion Eng Renais Drama
    This page intentionally left blank The Cambridge Companion to English Renaissance Drama This second edition of the Companion offers students up-to-date factual and interpretative material about the principal theatres, playwrights, and plays of the most important period of English drama, from 1580 to 1642. Three wide- ranging chapters on theatres, dramaturgy, and the social, cultural, and political conditions of the drama are followed by chapters describing and illustrating various theatrical genres: private and occasional drama, political plays, heroic plays, burlesque, comedy, tragedy, with a final essay on the drama produced during the reign of Charles I. Several of the essays have been substantially revised and all of the references updated. An expanded biographical and bib- liographical section details the work of the dramatists discussed in the book and the best sources for further study. A chronological table provides a full listing of new plays performed from 1497 to 1642, with a parallel list of major political and theatrical events. THE CAMBRIDGE COMPANION TO ENGLISH RENAISSANCE DRAMA EDITED BY A. R. BRAUNMULLER AND MICHAEL HATTAWAY SECOND EDITION cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru,UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Informationonthistitle:www.cambridge.org/9780521821155 © Cambridge University Press 1990, 2003 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provision of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Library of Congress Classification System
    PR ENGLISH LITERATURE PR English literature Literary history and criticism 1 Periodicals. Serials (3) Yearbooks see PR1 5 Societies 7 Congresses 9 Museums. Exhibitions Subarrange by author Catalogs of slides 10 General 10.5.A-Z Catalogs of public institutions. By name of institution, A-Z Collections of monographs, studies, etc. For collected essays, studies, etc., of individual authors see PR99 13 Series. Monographs by different authors 14 Minor collections. Festschriften 19 Encyclopedias. Dictionaries Communication of information 20 General works 20.3 Information services 20.5 Computer network resources Including the Internet Theory and principles of the study of English literature 21 General works 25 Relation to English history 27 History of literary history Study and teaching 31 Periodicals. Societies. Serials 33 General works. Treatises, etc. Outlines, syllabi, etc. see PR87 35 General special 37 Addresses, essays, lectures By period 41 Middle ages to 1600 43 17th-18th centuries 45 19th century 47 20th century 51.A-Z By region or country, A-Z 53.A-Z By school, A-Z Biography of teachers, critics, and historians 54 Collective 55.A-Z Individual, A-Z Subarrange each by Table P-PZ50 56 Literary research Criticism Cf. PN80+ General literary criticism 57 General works 61 Addresses, essays, lectures 63 History 65.A-Z Special topics, A-Z 65.D57 Discourse analysis 65.M38 Marxist criticism 65.T48 Textual criticism 67 Collections of essays in criticism For collections by individual authors see PR99 By period 1 PR ENGLISH LITERATURE PR Criticism Collections of essays in criticism By period -- Continued Medieval to 1600 Including Elizabethan 69 Treatises.
    [Show full text]
  • Music in English Renaissance Drama
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Music Arts and Humanities 1968 Music in English Renaissance Drama John H. Long Greensboro College Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Long, John H., "Music in English Renaissance Drama" (1968). Music. 2. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_music/2 MUSIC IN ENGLISH RENAISSANCE DRAMA This page intentionally left blank MUSIC IN ENGLISH RENAISSANCE DRAMA CONTRIBUTORS Nan Cooke Carpenter Ernest Brennecke Ian Spink R. W. Ingram MacDonald Emslie Willa McClung Evans Vincent Duckles EDITED BY John H. Long University of Kentucky Press Lexington 1968 Copyright © 1968 University of Kentucky Press Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 68-12969 INTRODUCTION It is the purpose of this volume to present some significant examples of the use of music in English dramatic and semidramatic works composed and presented between the years 1550 and 1650, a span of a century which for this limited purpose shall serve as a temporal definition of the English Renaissance. The bulk of scholarship devoted to the subject in the past has been limited largely to the works of one playwright, Shakespeare, and to one semidramatic form, the court masque. Monumental as Shakespeare was and is, and magnificent as the court masques were, they did not encompass completely the versatility with which music was employed for dramatic purposes during the period, in the works of lesser play­ wrights or in the elaborate "entertainments," the interludes, the pageants, the folk-plays, and other more-or-less dramatic productions that, in intent and practice, merged one into another to defy formal categorization.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maid's Tragedy ; And, Philaster
    Tufts College Library FROM THE FUND ESTABLISHED BY ALUMNI IPR2422 .T5 Beaumont, Francis, 1584-1616. The maid’s tragedy, and Philaster 39090000737565 die 2MIe0?tlettre0 ^eneg SECTION III THE ENGLISH DRAMA FROM ITS BEGINNING TO THE PRESENT DAY GENERAL EDITOR GEORGE PIERCE BAKER PROFESSOR OF DRAMATIC LITERATURE IN HARVARD UNIVERSITY Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https://archive.org/details/maidstragedyandp01beau The Blackfriars’ Theatre Reproduced, by permission from the collection of E, Gardner, Esq., London. THE MAID’S TRAGEDY AND PHILASTER By FRANCIS BEAUMONT AND JOHN FLETCHER EDITED BY ASHLEY H. THORNDIKE, Ph.D. PROFESSOR OF ENGLISH LITERATURE IN NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY BOSTON, U.S.A., AND LONDON D. C. HEATH & CO., PUBLISHERS COPYRIGHT, 1906, BY D. C. HEATH & CO. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED /X3f?3 YR 242. 3- i 'Bfograp^ Francis Beaumont, third son of Sir Francis Beaumont of Grace Dieu in Leicestershire, one of the Justices of Common Pleas, was born about 1585 and died March 6, 1616. He was admitted gentleman commoner at Broadgates Hall, Oxford, in 1597, and was entered at the Inner Temple, London, November 3, 1600. He was married to Ursula, daughter of Henry Isley of Sundridge, Kent, probably in 1613, and left two daughters (one a posthumous child). He was buried in Westminster Abbey. John Fletcher, son of Richard Fletcher, Bishop of London, was baptized at Rye in Sussex, where his father was then minister, December 20, 1579, and died of the plague in August, 1625. He was entered as a pensioner at Bene’t College, Cambridge, 1 591. His father as Dean of Peterborough attended Mary Queen of Scots at Fotheringay, and was later rapidly promoted to the sees of Bristol, Worcester, and London.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis of Masculinity
    The Crisis of Masculinity: Twins, Early Modern Medicine, and Drama, 1594-1655 POWELL, Louise Marie Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/25117/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version POWELL, Louise Marie (2019). The Crisis of Masculinity: Twins, Early Modern Medicine, and Drama, 1594-1655. Doctoral, Sheffield Hallam University. Copyright and re-use policy See http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk The Crisis of Masculinity: Twins, Early Modern Medicine, and Drama, 1594-1655 Louise Marie Powell A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Sheffield Hallam University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2019 Abstract This thesis examines the representation of twins in three early modern medical works and eight dramatic texts which were published between 1594 and 1655 in relation to the idea of a crisis of masculinity. It will analyse the illustrations and descriptions of two people who shared the same birth in midwifery manuals by Eucharius Rösslin, Jacques Guillemeau, and Jakob Rüff alongside the twin characters of dramatic works. The plays range from the very well known to the relatively obscure, while the gender configuration of twin characters is split evenly between wholly male and mixed-gender twins. Chapter One examines William Shakespeare’s The Comedy of Errors (1594) and William Ryder’s The Twins (1635), while Chapter Two focuses upon John Fletcher’s The Bloody Brother (c.1617) and Francis Quarles’ The Virgin Widow (c.
    [Show full text]
  • English Restoration Theatre
    THE CAMBRIDGE COMPANION TO ENGLISH RESTORATION THEATRE EDITED BY DEBORAH PAYNE FISK published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru, United Kingdom http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011±3211, USA http://www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia Ruiz de Alarco n 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain # Cambridge University Press 2000 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2000 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeset in 10/13pt Sabon [ce] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library isbn 0 521 58215 6 hardback isbn 0 521 58812 x paperback CONTENTS Illustrations page xi Notes on contributors xii Preface xv Abbreviations xix Chronology: Texts and Events xxi 1 The theatre 1 EDWARD A. LANGHANS 2 The performance 19 JOSEPH ROACH 3 Adaptations and revivals 40 MICHAEL DOBSON 4 Comedy 52 BRIAN CORMAN 5 Tragedy 70 CHRISTOPHER J. WHEATLEY 6 Tragicomedy 86 NANCY KLEIN MAGUIRE 7 Farce 107 PETER HOLLAND 8 Restoration and settlement: 1660 and 1688 127 DEREK HUGHES ix contents 9 Change, skepticism, and uncertainty 142 JESSICA MUNNS 10 Drama and political crisis 158 SUSAN J. OWEN 11 Spectacle, horror, and pathos
    [Show full text]
  • This Essay Is Not for Wider Distribution. Thank You. The
    This essay is not for wider distribution. Thank you. The Dearth of the Author Eoin Price ([email protected]) (@eoin_price) 1613 was an annus horribilis for the King’s Men. On June 29, the Globe burned down during a production of Shakespeare and Fletcher’s Henry VIII. By the end of the year, one half of that play’s collaborative team had retired. While the King’s Men rebuilt the Globe, replacing Shakespeare – a writer, a sharer, an actor – was a tougher task. It was a task made harder by the untimely retirement of the stroke-stricken Francis Beaumont, Fletcher’s younger but more senior collaborative partner.1 Beaumont was by this point a big draw for the King’s Men. Having moved from the boy companies, he and Fletcher co-wrote Philaster (1609), A King and No King (1611) and The Maid’s Tragedy (1611) for the King’s Men. Each was apparently a significant success and remained in the company’s repertory for decades.2 These losses surely represented bad news for the King’s Men, but Fletcher may have felt more ambivalent: the dual retirements of Shakespeare and Beaumont afforded him the opportunity to hold a more prominent position within the King’s Men. If there was such a thing as an immediate successor to Shakespeare, then it was Fletcher who best fit the bill. Unlike most writers of his generation, who moved from company to company in a bid to earn a living as a playwright, Fletcher wrote almost exclusively for the King’s Men from 1613.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RISE of the LIBERTINE HERO on the RESTORATION STAGE by JAMES BRYAN HILEMAN (Under the Direction of Elizabeth Kraft)
    THE RISE OF THE LIBERTINE HERO ON THE RESTORATION STAGE by JAMES BRYAN HILEMAN (Under the Direction of Elizabeth Kraft) ABSTRACT Structured in the style of a printed play of the period (though with only three acts), this study focuses on the proto-libertine hero in the plays of the restored stage of the 1660s and on the plays from whence he sprang. My goal is to revise the thinking about this figure, to cleanse him, and the times that produced him, of centuries of cultural effluvia by taking all these accumulations into account. He attained the zenith of his cultural career during the 1670s; his best representations, outside of the poems and the lives of noblemen such as the Earl of Rochester, are on the stage. In a sense he represents and embodies the last full flowering of the aristocracy before the commercial classes and their characteristic, Idealistic, Christian-humanist, bourgeois modes of thinking came to dominate English culture and to alternately effeminize and demonize this figure as ―the Restoration rake.‖ His Epicurean Materialism also parallels the rise of experimental science, though his fall does not. I examine his practice and the theory that informs him, his emphasis on inductive, a posteriori reasoning, the fancy-wit that combines sensations and ideas in order to create new conceptions, his notion that desire for largely physical pleasure is humanity‘s (and even women‘s) primary motivation, and his valuing the freedom to act and think contrary to ―official,‖ moral constraint, often in subversive, playful, and carnivalesque ways. This character‘s primary dramatic precursors are featured most prominently in the plays of John Fletcher, the most popular playwright of the seventeenth century, but also in those of James Shirley, Sir John Suckling, and Thomas Killigrew.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirkman's the Wits Or Sport Upon Sport As
    Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of English and American Studies English Language and Literature Klára Škrobánková Kirkman’s The Wits or Sport Upon Sport as a Testimony of the Theatre Life during the Civil Wars and the Interregnum Master’s Diploma Thesis Supervisor: Mgr. Filip Krajník, Ph. D. 2017 I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently, using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. …………………………………………….. Author’s signature Acknowledgement I would like to thank Mgr. Filip Krajník, Ph.D. and prof. Pavel Drábek, Ph.D. for their kind help and for providing me with useful literature, which crucially influenced this thesis. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 1. THE SHIFTING PERSPECTIVE OF 1642 CLOSURE 7 2. THE THREE PREFACES TO THE WITS 14 3. THE HEART OF THE WITS – ADAPTING BEAUMONT AND FLETCHER 23 4. ENTER THE CLOWNS 31 5. BUMPKINS, SIMPKINS, SIMPLETONS – DROLLS AND POPULAR CULTURE 45 CONCLUSION 64 WORKS CITED AND CONSULTED 67 LIST OF PRIMARY SOURCES 67 LIST OF SECONDARY SOURCES 69 SUMMARY 72 RESUMÉ 74 APPENDIX 76 INTRODUCTION In 1662, two years after the reopening of public theatres in England, Henry Marsh, a London-based bookseller, published a collection of drolls called The Wits, or Sport for Sport that contained twenty-seven drolls and farces. Ten years later, Marsh’s co-worker Francis Kirkman reissued this volume of drolls, which was in a year’s time (1773) followed by the second volume of the Wits. The collection contains many adaptations of plays by famous and popular authors of the pre-War period – mainly William Shakespeare, Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher.
    [Show full text]