DOCSLIB.ORG

Class I Railroad Annual Report Restatement to the Surface Transportation Board for the Year Ending December 31, 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BNSF Railway Company Leased Lines and Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries 2650 Lou Menk Drive ACAA - R1 Fort Worth, Texas 76131 Class I Railroad Annual Report Restatement To The Surface Transportation Board For the Year Ending December 31, 2012 NOTICE 1. This report is required for every class I railroad operating within the United States. Three copies of this Annual Report should be completed. Two of the copies must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration, The Mercury Building, 1925 K St. N.W., Suite 500, Washington, DC 20423, by March 31 of the year following that for which the report is made. One copy should be retained by the carrier. 2. Every inquiry must be definitely answered. Where the word "none" truly and completely states the fact, it should be given as the answer. If any inquiry is inapplicable, the words "not applicable" should be used. 3. Wherever the space provided in the schedules in insufficient to permit a full and complete statement of the requested information, inserts should be prepared and appropriately identified by the number of the schedule. 4. All entries should be made in a permanent black ink or typed. Those of a contrary character must be indicated in parenthesis. Items of an unusual character must be indicated by appropriate symbols and explained in footnotes. 5. Money items, except averages, throughout the annual report form should be shown in thousands of dollars adjusted to accord with footings. Totals for amounts reported in subsidiary accounts included in supporting schedules must be in agreement with related primary accounts. For purposes of rounding, amounts of'$500 but less than $1,000 should be raised to the nearest thousand dollars, and amounts of less than $500 should be lowered. 6. Except where the context clearly indicates some other meaning, the following terms when used in this Form have the following meanings: (a) Board means Surface Transportation Board. (b) Respondent means the person or corporation in whose behalf the report is made. (c ) Year means the year ended December 31 for which the report is being made. (d) Close of the Year means the close of business on December 31 for the year in which the report is being made. If the report is made for a shorter period than one year, it means the close of the period covered by the report. (e) Beginning of the Year means the beginning of business on January 1 of the year for which the report is being made. If the report is made for a shorter period than one year, it means the beginning of that period. (1) Preceding Year means the year ended December 31 of the year preceding the year for which the report is made. (g) The Uniform System of Accounts for Railroad Companies means the system of accounts in Part 1201 of Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations. as amended. 7. The ICC Termination Act of 1995 abolished the Interstate Commerce Commission and replaced it with the Surface Transportation Board. Any references to the Interstate Commerce Commission or Commission contained in this report refer to the Surface Transportation Board. 8. Any references to the Bureau of Accounts or the Office of Economics contained in this report refer to the Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration of the Surface Transportation Board. 9. NOTE - An additional line has been added to Schedule 755 (Line 134) effective with the 2004 R-l. Also note that the instructions for completion of Schedule 755 now have two additional items (Instructions U and V). 10. NOTE - The columns in Schedule 710-Distribution of Locomotive Units In Service of Respondent At Close Of Year, Disregarding Year Of Rebuilding have been revised to reflect new five year periods. 11. NOTE - The following supplemental information about STB information collections is provided in compliance with OMB requirements and pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501et seq.: Supplemental Information about the Annual Report (R-l) This information collection is mandatory pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 11145. The estimated hour burden for filing this report is less than 800 hours. Information in the Annual Reports is used to monitor and assess railroad industry growth, financial stability, traffic, and operations and to identify industry changes that may affect national transportation policy. In addition, the Board uses data from these reports to more effectively carry out regulatory responsibilities, such as acting on railroad requests for authority to engage in Board regulated financial transactions (for example, mergers, acquisitions of control, consolidations, and abandonments); conducting investigations and rulemakings; conducting rail revenue adequacy proceedings; developing rail cost adjustment factors; and developing the URCS, which is a cost measurement methodology. URCS was developed by the Board pursuant to 49 U .S.C. 11161 and is used as a tool in rail rate proceedings to calculate the variable costs associated with providing a particular service in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 10707(d). The Board also uses URCS to analyze the information that it obtains through the annual railroad industry waybill sample, see 49 CFR 1244, and in railroad abandonment proceedings to measure off-branch costs, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10904(a) and in accordance with 49 CFR 1152.32(n). The information in this report is ordinarily maintained by the agency in hard copy for 10 years, after which it is transferred to the National Archives, where it is maintained as a permanent record. These reports are also maintained by the agency indefinitely on microfiche. In addition, some of this information is posted on the Board's website, www.stb.dot.gov, where it may remain indefinitely. All information collected through this report is available to the public. The OMB control number for this collection is 2140-0009. The display of a currently valid OMB control number is required by law. Supplemental Information about the Quarterly Condensed Balance Sheet (CBS) This information collection is mandatory under 49 CFR 1243.2. The estimated hour burden for filing this report is six hours per report. The Board uses the information in this report to ensure competitive, efficient, and safe transportation through general oversight programs that monitor and forecast the financial and operating condition of railroads, and through specific regulation of railroad-rate and service issues and rail-restructuring proposals, including railroad mergers, consolidations, acquisitions of control, and abandonments. Information from the reports is used by the Board, other Federal agencies, and industry groups, including the Association of American Railroads, to assess industry growth and operations, detect changes in carrier financial stability, and identify trends that may affect the national transportation system. Information from these reports is compiled by the Board and published on its website, www.stb.dot.gov, where it may be maintained indefinitely. The compilation report is entitled Class I Railroads. Selected Earning Data. In addition, paper copies of individual reports are maintained by the Board for ten years, after which they are destroyed. All information collected through this report is available to the public. The display of a currently valid OMB control number for this collection is required by law. Supplemental Information about the Quarterly Report of Revenues, Expenses, and Income (Form RE&I) This information collection is mandatory pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 11164 and 49 CFR 1243.1. The estimated hour burden for filing this report is six hours per report. The Board uses the information in this report to ensure competitive, efficient, and safe transportation through general oversight programs that monitor and forecast the financial and operating condition of railroads, and through regulation of railroad rate and service issues and rail restructuring proposals, including railroad mergers, consolidations, acquisitions of control and abandonments. Information from the reports is used by the Board, other Federal agencies and industry groups to monitor and assess industry growth and operations, detect changes in carrier financial stability, and identify trends that may affect the national transportation system. Individual and aggregate carrier information is needed in our decision making process. Information from these reports is compiled by the Board and published on its website.www.stb.dot.gov. where it may be maintained indefinitely. The compilation report is entitled Class I Railroads. Selected Earnings Data. In addition, paper copies of individual reports are maintained by the Board for ten years, after which they are destroyed. All information collected through this report is available to the public. The display of a currently valid OMB control number for this collection is required by law. Supplemental Information about the Report of Railroad Employees, Service, and Compensation (Wage Forms A & B) This information collection is mandatory pursuant to 49 D.S.C. 11145 and 49 CFR 1245.2. The estimated hour burden for filing this report is 30 hours per quarterly report and 40 hours per annual report. The Board uses information in this report to forecast labor costs and measure the efficiency of the reporting railroads. The information is also used by the Board to evaluate proposed regulated transactions that may impact rail employees. These transactions include mergers and consolidations, acquisitions of control, purchases, and abandonments. Other Federal agencies and industry groups, including the Railroad Retirement Board, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the Association of American Railroads, depend on the information contained in the reports to monitor railroad operations. Certain information from the reports is compiled and published on the Board's website,www.stb.dot.gov. where it may be maintained indefinitely. In addition, paper copies of individual reports are maintained by the Board for ten years, after which they are destroyed. All information collected through this report is available to the public.
Recommended publications
  • State Variation in Railroad Wheat Rates

    State Variation in Railroad Wheat Rates

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OJS at Oregondigital.org (Oregon State University / University of Oregon) JTRF Volume 53 No. 3, Fall 2014 State Variation in Railroad Wheat Rates by Michael W. Babcock, Matthew McKamey, and Phillip Gayle Wheat shippers in the Central Plains states have no cost effective transportation alternative to railroads. Wheat produced in these areas moves long distances to domestic processing and consumption locations or to ports for export. Wheat shippers in the Great Plains don’t have direct access to barge loading locations and trucks provide no intermodal competition for these movements. Wheat shippers in Montana and North Dakota are highly dependent on rail transport because they are distant from barge loading locations and intra-railroad competition is limited. In North Dakota, the BNSF controls 78% of the Class I rail mileage, and in Montana, the BNSF controls 94%. Montana ships nearly 100% of its wheat by rail. Unlike Montana and North Dakota, the BNSF and UP have roughly equal track mileage in Kansas. The BNSF has 44% of the Class I rail mileage and the UP, 55%. Also, both railroads serve the major Kansas grain storage and market centers. A 2010 USDA study found that in 1988, Montana and North Dakota had the highest rail grain revenue per ton-mile of the 10 major grain producing states. By 2007 this was no longer the case. The overall objective of the paper is to investigate railroad pricing behavior for the shipment of North Dakota, Kansas, and Montana wheat.
  • North Dakota Rail Fast Facts for 2019 Freight Railroads …

    North Dakota Rail Fast Facts for 2019 Freight Railroads …

    Freight Railroads in North Dakota Rail Fast Facts For 2019 Freight railroads …............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Freight railroad mileage …..........................................................................................................................................3,223 Freight rail employees …...............................................................................................................................................1,760 Average wages & benefits per employee …...................................................................................................$134,630 Railroad retirement beneficiaries …......................................................................................................................3,000 Railroad retirement benefits paid ….....................................................................................................................$83 million U.S. Economy: According to a Towson University study, in 2017, America's Class I railroads supported: Sustainability: Railroads are the most fuel efficient way to move freight over land. It would have taken approximately 8.1 million additional trucks to handle the 145.8 million tons of freight that moved by rail in North Dakota in 2019. Rail Traffic Originated in 2019 Total Tons: 48.5 million Total Carloads: 497,200 Commodity Tons (mil) Carloads Farm Products 19.1 184,600 Crude Oil 15.7 168,100 Food Products
  • Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2017 Enforcement Report

    Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2017 Enforcement Report

    Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2017 Enforcement Report Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Summary of Inspections and Audits Performed, and of Enforcement Actions Recommended in FY 2017 A. Railroad Safety and Hazmat Compliance Inspections and Audits 1. All Railroads and Other Entities (e.g., Hazmat Shippers) Except Individuals 2. Railroads Only B. Summary of Railroad Safety Violations Cited by Inspectors, by Regulatory Oversight Discipline or Subdiscipline 1. Accident/Incident Reporting 2. Grade Crossing Signal System Safety 3. Hazardous Materials 4. Industrial Hygiene 5. Motive Power and Equipment 6. Railroad Operating Practices 7. Signal and train Control 8. Track C. FRA and State Inspections of Railroads, Sorted by Railroad Type 1. Class I Railroads 2. Probable Class II Railroads 3. Probable Class III Railroads D. Inspections and Recommended Enforcement Actions, Sorted by Class I Railroad 1. BNSF Railway Company 2. Canadian National Railway/Grand Trunk Corporation 3. Canadian Pacific Railway/Soo Line Railroad Company 4. CSX Transportation, Inc. 5. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company 6. National Railroad Passenger Corporation 7. Norfolk Southern Railway Company 8. Union Pacific Railroad Company III. Summaries of Civil Penalty Initial Assessments, Settlements, and Final Assessments in FY 2017 A. In General B. Summary 1—Brief Summary, with Focus on Initial Assessments Transmitted C. Breakdown of Initial Assessments in Summary 1 1. For Each Class I Railroad Individually in FY 2017 2. For Probable Class II Railroads in the Aggregate in FY 2017 3. For Probable Class III Railroads in the Aggregate in FY 2017 4. For Hazmat Shippers in the Aggregate in FY 2017 5.
  • BNSF Railway Company Leased Lines and Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries

    BNSF Railway Company Leased Lines and Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries

    BNSF Railway Company Leased Lines and Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries Class I Railroad Annual Report To the Surface Transportation Board For the Year Ending December 31, 2017 ACAA-R1 BNSF Railway Company 2650 Lou Menk Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76131 ANNUAL REPORT OF BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY TO THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 Name, official title, telephone number, and office address of officer in charge of correspondence with the Board regarding this report. (Name) Jon I. Stevens (Title) Vice President & Controller (Telephone number) (817) 352-4975 (Area (Area Code) code) (Telephone (Telephone Number) number) (Office address) 2650 Lou Menk Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76131 (Street and number, City, State, and ZIP code) NOTICE 1. This report is required for every class I railroad operating within the United States. Three copies of this Annual Report should be completed. Two of the copies must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration, 395 E Street, S.W. Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20423, by March 31 of the year following that for which the report is made. One copy should be retained by the carrier. 2. Every inquiry must be definitely answered. Where the word "none" truly and completely states the fact, it should be given as the answer. If any inquiry is inapplicable, the words "not applicable" should be used. 3. Wherever the space provided in the schedules in insufficient to permit a full and complete statement of the requested information, inserts should be prepared and appropriately identified by the number of the schedule.
  • Intrarailroad and Intermodal Competition Impacts on Railroad Wheat Rates by Michael W

    Intrarailroad and Intermodal Competition Impacts on Railroad Wheat Rates by Michael W

    JTRF Volume 54 No. 3, Fall 2015 Intrarailroad and Intermodal Competition Impacts on Railroad Wheat Rates by Michael W. Babcock and Bebonchu Atems The issue addressed in this paper is more fully understanding the relationship of intrarailroad competition and rail rates for wheat in the largest wheat producing states, which are Idaho, Kansas, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Washington. The overall objective of the study is to investigate railroad pricing behavior for wheat shipments. The rate model was estimated with OLS in double-log specification utilizing the 2012 STB Confidential Waybill sample and other data. The research found that the distance from origin to destination and the total shipment weight had the expected negative relationships with railroad wheat rates and were statistically significant. The distance from origin to the nearest barge loading location had the expected positive relationship to railroad wheat rates and was also significant. The weight of each covered hopper car and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index were both non-significant. However, the study used other data to determine that intrarailroad competition for wheat shipments within states appears to be present in most states. INTRODUCTION Railroads were the most heavily regulated transportation mode prior to passage of the Staggers Rail Act in 1980. Deregulation gave the railroads price flexibility that was previously unavailable. Prices between variable cost and 180% of variable cost were not subject to regulatory review. The Staggers Act set time limits for ICC decisions regarding abandonments and mergers. Thus, Class I railroads were able to quickly abandon or sell unprofitable branch lines.
  • South Dakota's Railroads

    South Dakota's Railroads

    South Dakota’s Railroads South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office South Dakota’s Railroads: An Historic Context Prepared for: South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office 900 Governors Drive Pierre, South Dakota 57501 Prepared by: Mark Hufstetler and Michael Bedeau Renewable Technologies, Inc. 511 Metals Bank Bldg. Butte, Montana 59701 July 1998 Revised, December 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................2 A. Purpose of this Document..............................................................................................2 B. Methodology ..................................................................................................................3 2. The Importance of Railroads to South Dakota ...........................................................................4 3. The History of Railroading in South Dakota..............................................................................5 A. Geographical Background .............................................................................................5 B. Establishment and Expansion: South Dakota Railroads in the Nineteenth Century......6 1. Beginnings (1851-1868) .....................................................................................6 2. The Little Dakota Boom and the First Railroads (1868-1873)...........................8 3. Railway Expansion During the Great Dakota Boom (1878-1887).....................9 4. The Impact and
  • BNSF Railway Company

    BNSF Railway Company

    BNSF Railway Company Leased Lines and Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries Class I Railroad Annual Report To the Surface Transportation Board For the Year Ending December 31, 2013 ACAA-R1 BNSF Railway Company 2650 Lou Menk Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76131 NOTICE 1. This report is required for every class I railroad operating within the United States. Three copies of this Annual Report should be completed. Two of the copies must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration, 395 E Street, S.W. Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20423, by March 31 of the year following that for which the report is made. One copy should be retained by the carrier. 2. Every inquiry must be definitely answered. Where the word "none" truly and completely states the fact, it should be given as the answer. If any inquiry is inapplicable, the words "not applicable" should be used 3. Wherever the space provided in the schedules in insufficient to permit a full and complete statement of the requested information, inserts should be prepared and appropriately identified by the number of the schedule. 4. All entries should be made in a permanent black ink or typed. Those of a contrary character must be indicated in parenthesis. Items of an unusual character must be indicated by appropriate symbols and explained in footnotes. 5. Money items, except averages, throughout the annual report form should be shown in thousands of dollars adjusted to accord with footings. Totals for amounts reported in subsidiary accounts included in supporting schedules must be in agreement with related primary accounts.
  • Federal Railroad Administration

    Federal Railroad Administration

    Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2020 Enforcement Report Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Summary of Inspections and Audits Performed, and of Enforcement Actions Recommended in FY 2020 A. Railroad Safety and Hazmat Compliance Inspections and Audits 1. All Railroads and Other Entities (e.g., Hazmat Shippers) Except Individuals 2. Railroads Only B. Summary of Railroad Safety Violations Cited by Inspectors, by Regulatory Oversight Discipline or Subdiscipline 1. Accident/Incident Reporting 2. Grade Crossing Signal System Safety 3. Hazardous Materials 4. Industrial Hygiene 5. Motive Power and Equipment 6. Railroad Operating Practices 7. Signal and train Control 8. Track C. FRA and State Inspections of Railroads, Sorted by Railroad Type 1. Class I Railroads 2. Probable Class II Railroads 3. Probable Class III Railroads D. Inspections and Recommended Enforcement Actions, Sorted by Class I Railroad 1. BNSF Railway Company 2. Canadian National Railway/Grand Trunk Corporation 3. Canadian Pacific Railway/Soo Line Railroad Company 4. CSX Transportation, Inc. 5. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company 6. National Railroad Passenger Corporation 7. Norfolk Southern Railway Company 8. Union Pacific Railroad Company III. Summaries of Civil Penalty Initial Assessments, Settlements, and Final Assessments in FY 2020 A. In General B. Summary 1—Brief Summary, with Focus on Initial Assessments Transmitted C. Breakdown of Initial Assessments in Summary 1 1. For Each Class I Railroad Individually in FY 2020 2. For Probable Class II Railroads in the Aggregate in FY 2020 3. For Probable Class III Railroads in the Aggregate in FY 2020 4. For Hazmat Shippers in the Aggregate in FY 2020 5.
  • North Dakota Strategic Freight Planning Analysis Phase I: 2006-2008

    North Dakota Strategic Freight Planning Analysis Phase I: 2006-2008

    North Dakota Strategic Freight Planning Analysis Phase I: 2006-2008 Prepared for North Dakota Department of Transportation Mark Berwick Mark Lofgren Tamara VanWechel Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute North Dakota State University Fargo, North Dakota October 2009 Disclaimer The contents presented in this report are the sole responsibility of the Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute and the authors. North Dakota State University does not discriminate on the basis of age, color, disability, gender identity, marital status, national origin, public assistance status, sex, sexual orientation, status as a U.S. veteran, race or religion. Direct inquiries to the Vice President for Equity, Diversity and Global Outreach, 205 Old Main, (701)231-7708. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION TO FREIGHT AND THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ........................... 1 1.1 The Transportation System .............................................................................................................. 3 1.1.1 Highways ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1.2 Railroads .................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1.3 Air 8 1.1.4 Pipelines .................................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Freight Transportation ..................................................................................................................
  • BNSF Railway Company Class I Railroad Annual Report

    BNSF Railway Company Class I Railroad Annual Report

    BNSF Railway Company Leased Lines and Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries Class I Railroad Annual Report To the Surface Transportation Board For the Year Ending December 31, 2018 ACAA-R1 BNSF Railway Company 2650 Lou Menk Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76131 ANNUAL REPORT OF BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY TO THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 Name, official title, telephone number, and office address of officer in charge of correspondence with the Board regarding this report. (Name) Paul Bischler (Title) Vice President & Controller (Telephone number) (817) 352-2600 (Area(Area code)Code) (Telephone (Telephone Number) number) (Office address) 2650 Lou Menk Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76131 (Street and number, City, State, and ZIP code) NOTICE 1. This report is required for every class I railroad operating within the United States. Three copies of this Annual Report should be completed. Two of the copies must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration, 395 E Street, S.W. Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20423, by March 31 of the year following that for which the report is made. One copy should be retained by the carrier. 2. Every inquiry must be definitely answered. Where the word "none" truly and completely states the fact, it should be given as the answer. If any inquiry is inapplicable, the words "not applicable" should be used. 3. Wherever the space provided in the schedules in insufficient to permit a full and complete statement of the requested information, inserts should be prepared and appropriately identified by the number of the schedule.
  • Pcmrail21 Userguide.Pdf

    Pcmrail21 Userguide.Pdf

    ALL RIGHTS RESERVED You may print one (1) copy of this document for your personal use. Otherwise, no part of this document may be reproduced, transmitted, transcribed, stored in a retrieval system, or translated into any language, in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, magnetic, optical, or otherwise, without prior written permission from ALK Technologies, Inc. Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and other countries. PC*MILER, CoPilot, ALK and RouteSync are registered trademarks of ALK Technologies, Inc. Copyright 2014 Railinc Corporation. All Rights Reserved. The Centralized Station Master, Junction-Interchange Master and Mark/SCAC Register appearing in this publication may not be reproduced without express permission from Railinc. ALK Technologies, Inc. reserves the right to make changes or improvements to its programs and documentation materials at any time and without prior notice. Copyright 1986-2014 ALK Technologies, Inc. 457 North Harrison Street, Princeton, NJ 08540 Table of Contents PC*MILER® Product Line END-USER LICENSE AGREEMENT ........................... iii Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 1.1 What Is PC*MILER|Rail? ............................................................................................1 1.2 Additional PC*MILER|Rail Solutions .........................................................................2 1.3 Recent New Features and Enhancements .....................................................................3
  • North Dakota Strategic Freight Planning Analysis Phase II: 2006-2008

    North Dakota Strategic Freight Planning Analysis Phase II: 2006-2008

    North Dakota Strategic Freight Planning Analysis Phase II: 2006-2008 Prepared for North Dakota Department of Transportation Prepared by Mark Berwick Mark Lofgren Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute North Dakota State University Fargo, North Dakota October 2009 Disclaimer The contents presented in this report are the sole responsibility of the Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute and the authors. North Dakota State University does not discriminate on the basis of age, color, disability, gender identity, marital status, national origin, public assistance status, sex, sexual orientation, status as a U.S. veteran, race or religion. Direct inquiries to the Vice President for Equity, Diversity and Global Outreach, 205 Old Main, (701)231-7708. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Biennial Strategic Freight Analysis Program concentrated on North Dakota‘s freight growth and freight system over the last biennium. The goal of this study was to provide information pertaining to freight and freight growth as it has occurred over the past 50 or 60 years. The highway system that exists in North Dakota was developed long ago for lower freight volumes moving in smaller vehicles over short distances. A system of freight transportation and logistics that provides for the efficient movements of goods is the key to the economic health of the world, our nation, regions within the country, individual states, and communities and rural areas. North Dakota‘s inflation adjusted Gross State Product more than tripled from 1963 to 2005. Many sectors of the economy contributed to the increase in GSP. This dramatic growth in the economy results in large increases in freight. Tonnage of agriculture production more than tripled from the 1940s to present on a decade average annual basis.