Resources for Transition Age Youth
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The 2019 TRIVALLEY San Francisco Business Times Publication
SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT AUGUST 2, 2019 Leaders of three thriving Tri-Valley companies met at the new City Center complex in San Ramon (from left): Scott Walchek, founder and CEO of Trōv; Ben Hindson, co-founder and CSO of 10x Genomics; Burton Goldfield, president and CEO of TriNet. TRI-VALLEY The heart of the matter Darrell Jobe of Vericool 10 Ken Gitlin of Robert Half 13 Derek Maunus of GILLIG 13 Lauren Moone of Mirador 16 SPONSORS: A Sunset Development Project 2 ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT TRI-VALLEY | THE HEART OF THE MATTER SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES A relationship aged to perfection. Proudly celebrating 55 years in the Tri-Valley. Fremont Bank is uniquely positioned as the only independent, locally Proud to offer 5 convenient owned, full-service community bank in the San Francisco Bay Area. From Tri-Valley locations: our 55 years of partnering with our Tri-Valley communities, to offering Danville Branch unprecedented access to local decision makers who understand your Pleasanton Branch goals, Fremont Bank is proud to be the Tri-Valley’s trusted financial Livermore Branch partner. San Ramon Branch Dublin Branch Call or stop by one of our Tri-Valley Branches to experience The Bay Area’s Premier Community Bank for yourself. (800) 359-BANK (2265) | www.fremontbank.com Equal Housing Lender | Member FDIC | NMLS #478471 | LCOM-0277-0719 AUGUST 2, 2019 ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT 3 Talent, innovation and heart drive success in the Tri-Valley ositioned at the geographic center of the Northern Cal- ifornia Mega-Region, the Tri-Valley innovation hub is lo- P cated at the heart of the region and delivering significant economic benefit. -
San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA Combined Statistical Area
San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA Combined Statistical Area MENDOCINO LAKE SUTTER PLACER San Jose- San Francisco- YOLO EL DORADO Oakland SANTA ROSA NAPA Santa SONOMA Rosa NAPA SACRAMENTO NAPA VALLEJO- AMADOR SANTA ROSA- FAIRFIELD PETALUMA Napa Fairfield SAN FRANCISCO- VALLEJO-FAIRFIELD OAKLAND-HAYWARD SOLANO San Rafael CALAVERAS Vallejo Lodi MARIN STOCKTON-LODI San Rafael CONTRA Stockton Berkeley COSTA Oakland- Hayward- San Jose- Walnut Berkeley Creek San Francisco- TUOLUMNE San San Oakland SAN Francisco Oakland Ramon FRANCISCO STOCKTON SAN (pt) San Leandro FRANCISCO (pt) Pleasanton SAN South JOAQUIN San Hayward Francisco ALAMEDA STANISLAUS SAN FRANCISCO- OAKLAND-FREMONT Redwood City Milpitas San Francisco- SAN 1 2 Sunnyvale Redwood City- MATEO South San Francisco Santa Clara Cupertino San Jose KEY SAN JOSE- 1 Palo Alto SUNNYVALE- MERCED 2 Mountain View SANTA SANTA CLARA CRUZ SANTA CLARA MADERA SANTA CRUZ- Santa Cruz WATSONVILLE Watsonville SANTA CRUZ- WATSONVILLE SAN BENITO SAN JOSE- Pacific SUNNYVALE- Ocean SANTA CLARA C FRESNO A L I F O MONTEREY R N IA LEGEND San Jose-San Francisco- Oakland 2012 Combined Statistical Area NAPA 2012 Metropolitan Statistical Area (none) 2012 Micropolitan Statistical Area San Rafael 2012 Metropolitan Divisions 0 10 20 30 40Kilometers Santa Cruz 2012 Principal City San Jose-San Francisco- 0 10 20 30 40Miles Oakland 2007 Combined Statistical Area STOCKTON 2007 Metropolitan Statistical Area (none) 2007 Micropolitan Statistical Area 2012 Combined Statistical Area (CSA) and Metropolitan/Micropolitan CALIFORNIA State or Statistical Equivalent Statistical Area (CBSA) boundaries and names are as of February 2013. ALAMEDA County or Statistical Equivalent 2007 Combined Statistical Areas (CSA) and Metropolitan/Micropolitan Statistical Areas (CBSA) are as of December 2006. -
Alameda, a Geographical History, by Imelda Merlin
Alameda A Geographical History by Imelda Merlin Friends of the Alameda Free Library Alameda Museum Alameda, California 1 Copyright, 1977 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 77-73071 Cover picture: Fernside Oaks, Cohen Estate, ca. 1900. 2 FOREWORD My initial purpose in writing this book was to satisfy a partial requirement for a Master’s Degree in Geography from the University of California in Berkeley. But, fortunate is the student who enjoys the subject of his research. This slim volume is essentially the original manuscript, except for minor changes in the interest of greater accuracy, which was approved in 1964 by Drs. James Parsons, Gunther Barth and the late Carl Sauer. That it is being published now, perhaps as a response to a new awareness of and interest in our past, is due to the efforts of the “Friends of the Alameda Free Library” who have made a project of getting my thesis into print. I wish to thank the members of this organization and all others, whose continued interest and perseverance have made this publication possible. Imelda Merlin April, 1977 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The writer wishes to acknowledge her indebtedness to the many individuals and institutions who gave substantial assistance in assembling much of the material treated in this thesis. Particular thanks are due to Dr. Clarence J. Glacken for suggesting the topic. The writer also greatly appreciates the interest and support rendered by the staff of the Alameda Free Library, especially Mrs. Hendrine Kleinjan, reference librarian, and Mrs. Myrtle Richards, curator of the Alameda Historical Society. The Engineers’ and other departments at the Alameda City Hall supplied valuable maps an information on the historical development of the city. -
San Francisco–Oakland–Hayward, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area
12/10/2015 San Francisco–Oakland–Hayward, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia San Francisco–Oakland–Hayward, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia San Francisco Metropolitan Area officially known as the "San FranciscoOaklandHayward, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area" is a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) within the San Francisco Bay Area, which includes a number of its core cities and counties. It is defined by the Office of Management and Budget to include core areas more directly economically influenced by San Francisco rather than outlying cities such as San Jose which has its own MSA, the San Jose–Sunnyvale–Santa Clara, CA MSA. Until 2013, this MSA was known as the San Francisco–Oakland–Fremont, CA MSA.[1][2] The Federal Government definition states that it consists of 5 counties, grouped into three divisions.[2] Those 5 counties are San Francisco, Alameda, Marin, Contra Costa, and San Mateo County.[2] The three divisions are Oakland–Hayward–Berkeley (Alameda and Contra Costa Counties), San Francisco–Redwood City–South San Francisco (San Francisco and San Mateo Counties), and San The component Metropolitan Statistical Rafael (Marin County).[2] Areas and their geographical location within the San Jose–San Francisco– The MSA is a subset of the 9 county San Francisco Bay Area, as Oakland, CSA. The San Francisco– well as the 12 county Combined Statistical Area, the San Jose–San Oakland–Hayward, CA MSA is in red. Francisco–Oakland, CA CSA. Three North Bay counties are -
About WETA Present Future a Plan for Expanded Bay Area Ferry Service
About WETA Maintenance Facility will consolidate Central and South Bay fleet operations, include a fueling facility with emergency fuel The San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation storage capacity, and provide an alternative EOC location, Authority (WETA) is a regional public transit agency tasked with thereby significantly expanding WETA’s emergency response operating and expanding ferry service on the San Francisco and recovery capabilities. Bay, and is responsible for coordinating the water transit response to regional emergencies. Future Present WETA is planning for a system that seamlessly connects cities in the greater Bay Area with San Francisco, using Today, WETA operates daily passenger ferry service to the fast, environmentally responsible vessels, with wait times cities of Alameda, Oakland, San Francisco, Vallejo, and South of 15 minutes or less during peak commute hours. WETA’s San Francisco, carr4$)"(*- /#)тѵр million passengers 2035 vision would expand service throughout the Bay Area, annually under the San Francisco Bay Ferry brand. Over the operating 12 services at 16 terminals with a fleet of 44 vessels. last five years, SF Bay Ferry ridership has grown чф percent. In the near term, WETA will launch a Richmond/San Francisco route (201ш) and new service to Treasure Island. Other By the Numbers terminal sites such as Seaplane Lagoon in Alameda, Berkeley, Mission Bay, Redwood City, the South Bay, and the Carquinez *- /#)ǔǹǒ --$ ./-).+*-/0+ Strait are on the not-too-distant horizon. ($''$*)-$ -. /*ǗǕǑ$& .-*.. 0. 4 --4 /# 4 #4ǹ 1 -44 -ǹ A Plan for Expanded Bay Area Ferry Service --4-$ -.#$+ 1 )! --$ . Vallejo #.$)- . /*!' / /2 )ǓǑǒǘ CARQUINEZ STRAIT Ǚǖʞ.$) ǓǑǒǓǹ )ǓǑǓǑǹ Hercules WETA Expansion Targets Richmond Funded Traveling by ferry has become increasingly more popular in • Richmond Berkeley the Bay Area, as the economy continues to improve and the • Treasure Island Partially Funded Pier 41 Treasure Island population grows. -
Pinolecreeksedimentfinal
Pinole Creek Watershed Sediment Source Assessment January 2005 Prepared by the San Francisco Estuary Institute for USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service and Contra Costa Resource Conservation District San Francisco Estuary Institute The Regional Watershed Program was founded in 1998 to assist local and regional environmental management and the public to understand, characterize and manage environmental resources in the watersheds of the Bay Area. Our intent is to help develop a regional picture of watershed condition and downstream effects through a solid foundation of literature review and peer- review, and the application of a range of science methodologies, empirical data collection and interpretation in watersheds around the Bay Area. Over this time period, the Regional Watershed Program has worked with Bay Area local government bodies, universities, government research organizations, Resource Conservation Districts (RCDs) and local community and environmental groups in the Counties of Marin, Sonoma, Napa, Solano, Contra Costa, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo, and San Francisco. We have also fulfilled technical advisory roles for groups doing similar work outside the Bay Area. This report should be referenced as: Pearce, S., McKee, L., and Shonkoff, S., 2005. Pinole Creek Watershed Sediment Source Assessment. A technical report of the Regional Watershed Program, San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI), Oakland, California. SFEI Contribution no. 316, 102 pp. ii San Francisco Estuary Institute ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors gratefully -
San Mateo County Public Wi-Fi Locations
" /" /" /"/" LEGEND /" San Mateo County Public Wi-Fi /" Availability David Canepa (District 5) Indoor Facility /" /" /"/" Community WiFi /" Park and Connect Site /" Park and Connect Site with some Community WiFi City Boundaries Supervisor District Boundaries /" Carole Groom (District 2) /" Warren Slocum (District 4) /" /" Don Horsley (District 3) /" ± 0 5 10 Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user 1 Inch = 10 Miles community San Mateo County Public Wi-Fi Loc(asa of Jtaniuoary,n 202s1) San Mateo County Public WiFi Sites Site Address Location Public WiFi Availability San Mateo County Harbor Bldg E 260-400 Harbor Blvd, Belmont, CA 94002 Belmont Indoor Facility San Mateo County Harbor Bldg A 260-400 Harbor Blvd, Belmont, CA 94002 Belmont Indoor Facility San Mateo County Harbor Bldg B 260-400 Harbor Blvd, Belmont, CA 94002 Belmont Indoor Facility San Mateo County Harbor Bldg C 260-400 Harbor Blvd, Belmont, CA 94002 Belmont Indoor Facility San Mateo County Human Services Agency 1 Davis Dr, Belmont, CA 94002 Belmont Indoor Facility Brisbane Community Pool 2 Solano St, Brisbane, CA 94005 Brisbane Indoor Facility Brisbane Community Pool 2 Solano St, Brisbane, CA 94005 Brisbane Park and Connect Site Colma Community Center 1520 Hillside Blvd, Colma, CA 94014 Colma Indoor Facility Daly City Community Services Center 350 90th St, Daly City, CA 94015 Daly City Indoor Facility Daly City Health Center 380 90th St, Daly City, CA 94015 Daly City Indoor Facility Health Youth Clinic 2778 Junipero Serra Blvd, Daly City, CA 94015 -
Digital Equity Strategic Plan 2019-2024 Table of Contents
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DIGITAL EQUITY STRATEGIC PLAN 2019-2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 5 Introduction 9 Our Process & Findings 13 Goals Overview 19 Goal 1: Access 20 Goal 2: Digital Skills and Usage 24 Goal 3: Long-term impact 28 Acknowledgements 31 Appendices 32 Appendix A: Digital Divide Survey Key Indicators 32 Appendix B: Stakeholder Engagement 35 Appendix C: Digital Equity Summit Report 38 2 San Francisco Digital Equity Strategic Plan 2019-2024 MESSAGE FROM THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO n San Francisco, we believe that all residents should have the ability to access the IInternet. We are committed to building a society that helps our most vulnerable residents connect to the wealth of opportunities and resources now available through technology. It is my great pleasure to share San Francisco’s plan to accomplish this through the City’s Digital Equity Strategic Plan. The Internet has transformed our society in more ways than one. Digital tools are now standard in our workforce, schools, health care, and City services. Yet not everyone has the same ability to access or benefit from these advances. It has never been more important to bridge the divides in Internet access and digital literacy. San Francisco’s Digital Equity Strategic Plan is a starting point to change the status quo to a more connected community. From the beginning, our strategy has been built with our community. Through interviews and interactive workshops, hundreds of residents and dozens of stakeholder organizations have provided input on where services are needed most. Over the next five years, San Francisco’s strategic efforts will focus on three main areas: ● Expand affordable, high-quality Internet access through strategic partnerships. -
Restoring San Francisco Bay
Restoring San Francisco Bay Amy Hutzel Coastal Conservancy Photo credit: Rick Lewis 150 years of urbanization has altered San Francisco Bay (1850) (1998) We have had a massive impact on the Bay over the last century We’ve filled thousands of acres We’ve dumped garbage IMPORTANCE OF TIDAL MARSH • Growing threat: Climate Change Photo credit: Vivian Reed • Build up of sediment and vegetation takes time. • Higher starting elevation means marshes survive sea-level rise for longer. San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority Mission: To raise and allocate resources for the restoration, enhancement, protection, and enjoyment of wetlands and wildlife habitat in the San Francisco Bay and along its shoreline. The San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority was created by Save The Bay and others through 2008 legislation. Its mandate is to propose new public funding mechanisms to voters for Bay marsh restoration; then provide grants to accelerate wetland restoration, flood protection, and public access to Bay. Governing Board comprised of elected officials from each quadrant of the Bay Area; Advisory Committee represents many community interests. It currently has no funding to carry out Photo credit: Vivian Reed its important mission. Clean and Healthy Bay Ballot Measure: Measure AA June 2016 ballot measure to accelerate Bay wetlands restoration $12/parcel/year for 20 years, would generate ~$500 million for restoration projects around the Bay Strong majority of nine-county Bay Area voters are supportive; needs 2/3 support in all nine counties, cumulatively, to pass Examples of Projects Anticipated to be Eligible For Funding: • Eden Landing (Alameda) • Chelsea Wetlands (Contra Costa) • Bel Marin Keys (Marin) • Edgerly Island (Napa) • Yosemite Slough (San Francisco) • Ravenswood Ponds (San Mateo) • Alviso Ponds (Santa Clara) • Benicia Shoreline (Solano) • Skaggs Island (Sonoma) Clean and Healthy Bay Ballot Measure: Measure AA Restoring vital fish, bird and wildlife habitat. -
Active Wetland Habitat Projects of the San
ACTIVE WETLAND HABITAT PROJECTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY JOINT VENTURE The SFBJV tracks and facilitates habitat protection, restoration, and enhancement projects throughout the nine Bay Area Projects listed Alphabetically by County counties. This map shows where a variety of active wetland habitat projects with identified funding needs are currently ALAMEDA COUNTY MAP ACRES FUND. NEED MARIN COUNTY (continued) MAP ACRES FUND. NEED underway. For a more comprehensive list of all the projects we track, visit: www.sfbayjv.org/projects.php Alameda Creek Fisheries Restoration 1 NA $12,000,000 McInnis Marsh Habitat Restoration 33 180 $17,500,000 Alameda Point Restoration 2 660 TBD Novato Deer Island Tidal Wetlands Restoration 34 194 $7,000,000 Coyote Hills Regional Park - Restoration and Public Prey enhancement for sea ducks - a novel approach 3 306 $12,000,000 35 3.8 $300,000 Access Project to subtidal habitat restoration Hayward Shoreline Habitat Restoration 4 324 $5,000,000 Redwood Creek Restoration at Muir Beach, Phase 5 36 46 $8,200,000 Hoffman Marsh Restoration Project - McLaughlin 5 40 $2,500,000 Spinnaker Marsh Restoration 37 17 $3,000,000 Eastshore State Park Intertidal Habitat Improvement Project - McLaughlin 6 4 $1,000,000 Tennessee Valley Wetlands Restoration 38 5 $600,000 Eastshore State Park Martin Luther King Jr. Regional Shoreline - Water 7 200 $3,000,000 Tiscornia Marsh Restoration 39 16 $1,500,000 Quality Project Oakland Gateway Shoreline - Restoration and 8 200 $12,000,000 Tomales Dunes Wetlands 40 2 $0 Public Access Project Off-shore Bird Habitat Project - McLaughlin 9 1 $1,500,000 NAPA COUNTY MAP ACRES FUND. -
(Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California
Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward p. 3 Introduction p. 5 Methods p. 7 Determining Historical Distribution and Current Status; Information Presented in the Report; Table Headings and Terms Defined; Mapping Methods Contra Costa County p. 13 Marsh Creek Watershed; Mt. Diablo Creek Watershed; Walnut Creek Watershed; Rodeo Creek Watershed; Refugio Creek Watershed; Pinole Creek Watershed; Garrity Creek Watershed; San Pablo Creek Watershed; Wildcat Creek Watershed; Cerrito Creek Watershed Contra Costa County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 39 Alameda County p. 45 Codornices Creek Watershed; Strawberry Creek Watershed; Temescal Creek Watershed; Glen Echo Creek Watershed; Sausal Creek Watershed; Peralta Creek Watershed; Lion Creek Watershed; Arroyo Viejo Watershed; San Leandro Creek Watershed; San Lorenzo Creek Watershed; Alameda Creek Watershed; Laguna Creek (Arroyo de la Laguna) Watershed Alameda County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 91 Santa Clara County p. 97 Coyote Creek Watershed; Guadalupe River Watershed; San Tomas Aquino Creek/Saratoga Creek Watershed; Calabazas Creek Watershed; Stevens Creek Watershed; Permanente Creek Watershed; Adobe Creek Watershed; Matadero Creek/Barron Creek Watershed Santa Clara County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. -
San Francisco • NATIONAL 80 5 • 24 FOREST NV • • CA Daly City SF Oakland Walnut Creek 88 • Bay 4 380 Oakland Airport San Leandro SF Intl
20 • Mendocino MENDOCINO NATIONAL FOREST Willits• 99 To Mendocino 5 • Chico • Point 128 Ukiah• TRAVEL DISTANCES CHART FROM SF Arena 20 Willows LOCATION HOURS MILES KM Boonville • 253 Berkeley 1/2 12 19 101 Best Sightseeing Deals Carmel 2 1/2 133 214 Los Angeles (HWY 5) 6 390 650 Lakeport Wine Tours, Muir Woods Vacaville 1 57 91 • Mendocino 4 156 251 175 Monterey & Carmel Monterey 2 1/2 133 209 1 Lake Yosemite Muir Woods /2 16 26 Clear Lake Napa (Wine Country) 1 46Or oville74 Sea Ranch • Oakland 991/3 10 16 Colusa 29 Point Reyes 1 38 61 Cloverdale 20 70 Sonoma • Portland, OR 10 1/2 667 1073 Lake Reno, NV 4 1/2 226 378 0 1 inch = 25 miles Sacramento 2 91 152 1 Geyserville 20 • 0 1 inch = 40 km SF Intl. Airport 1/3 14 22 175 29 San Diego 9 515 858 San Jose Yuba City • Marysville1 51 82 • Healdsburg Middletown (Winchester Mystery House) Guerneville Santa Cruz 2 74 119 River • Windsor Santa Clara 1 48 77 Jenner • • 16 River 128 Sausalito 1/3 8 13 Russian 101 r Sonomae (Wine Country) 1 43 69 Calistoga v i Bodega 116 • R Bay Santa Palo Alto 1 33 53 Sebastopol 1 • Rosa Tiburon Feather /2 16 26 • 12 • Yosemite 4 210 338 • St Helena Lake Dillon• Berryessa Beach 1 Kenwood • • 99 TAHOE NATIONAL Woodland CA 5 FOREST NV 12 29 505 Sparks• 128 • Petaluma Sonoma Reno • • 121 Davis • 80 Truckee• POINT REYES 116 WINE •Napa 267 395 NATIONAL 12 89 Incline Novato 121 COUNTRY Vacaville• Sacramento SEASHORE • Village• 80 r Tahoe City 37 e • v i P Lake Carson Marin • R 50 Fairfield A City County 101 to Meeks Bay • San Pablo Vallejo n • Tahoe Muir C San • Bay • e Woods Rafael ram 89 I Muir 680 c 780 a Stateline F Woods 580 S • 12 South Lake Tahoe • • I Richmond Tiburon • C Sausalito• • 4 Concord Berkeley • EL DORADO San Francisco • NATIONAL 80 5 • 24 FOREST NV • • CA Daly City SF Oakland Walnut Creek 88 • Bay 4 380 Oakland Airport San Leandro SF Intl.