(JAR)/Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) 23 Harmonization
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee General Aviation Certification and Operations Issue Area JAR/FAR 23 Harmonization Working Group Task 4 – Flight test Task Assignment IIIII~IMIIirt•·•·llllllllll .. ll .. lllllllllt•r•::rlrllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll~ to aDd 6:01Bpatible witla tlaat as8ipecl ao D. Draft a separate Notice of Proposed Federal Aviation Admlnlatnitlon the Avi.ation RulemakiJJs Advisory Rulemakina for Tasks 2-5 proposing CoiMriHee. The General Avielion and new or revised requirements, a Aviation Rulemaklng Advlaory Business AU-plaae Subcommittee, supportina economic analysis. and other Commmee; Gener11l Av.. tlon 8IKI consequently, estalliiebed t8e JAR/FAR required analysis, with any other Buslne.. Airplane SubcommlttH: Z3 HannenizatiOit Workiat Greup. conateral documeRts (sucb as. Advisory JAR/FAR 23 HarmonlzaUon Working Specifical1J, dae Work.ina Grevp's Circulars) the Workina Group Group tasb are tbe foliowing: The JAR/FAR 23 determines to be needed. Harmonization Working Group ii E. Give a status reporl oa each task at AGENCY: Federal Aviation ct:arged wUh making recommendations each meetina of the Subcommittee. Administration (FAA), DOT. to the General A viatton and Bulinest The JAR/FAR 23 Harmonization ACTION: Notice of establishment of JAR/ Airplane Subcommittee concerning the Working Croup win be comprised of FAR 23 Harmonization Working Group. FAA disposition of the CoDowing experts from those orpnlzations having rulemalcing subj.ecta recently an interest in the task assigned to it. A SUMMARY: Notice is given of the coordinated between ttse JAA 1111d the working group member need not establishment of the JAR/FAR Z3 FAA~ necessarily be a representative or one of Harmonization Working Group by the Task 1-Review/AR Issue$: Review the organizations of the parent General General Aviation and Business Airplane JAR 23 Issue No. 4 (which excludes Aviation and Business Airplane Subcommittee. This notice informs the commuter category airplanes} and No. 5 Subcommittee or of t~ fuH AviattO!l public of the activities of the General (which includes commuter category Rulemalcing Advisory Committee. An Aviation and Business Airplane airplanes), and compare them with . individual who has expertise in tfre Subcommittee of the Aviation Amendment 23-42 to FAR 23, and the subject matter and wishes to become a Rulemaking Advisory Committee. proposals in NOtices 3 and 4 from the member of the working group should FOR FURTHER·INFORMAnON CONTACT: Part Z3 Airworthiness Review. Identify write the person listed under the caption Mr. William J. Uoe) Sullivan, Executive . technical differences between JAR 23 "FOR FURnmR. INFORMATION Director. General Aviation and Business, and FAR Z3 which can be harmoDized. CONTACf" expressing that desire, Airplane Subcommittee, Aircraft Task 2-Systems and Equipment: describing his or her interest in the task. Certification Service (AIR-3). 800 · Based on the results of the Task 1 and the expertise he or she would bring Independence Avenue, SW., review. identify the changes to Subparts to the working group. The request will Washington, DC 20591, telephone: (Z02) D and F of FAR 23 that are appropriate be reviewed with the subcommittee 267-9554; FAX: (ZOZ) 267-9562. for harmonization, and those provisions chair and working group leader, and the that should not be harmonized, if any. individual advised whether or not the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMAnON: The Task 3-Powerplant: Based on the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) request can be accommodated. results of the Task 1 review, identify the The Secretary of Transportation has established an Aviation Rulemaking changes to Subpart E ofFAR 23 that are Advisory Committee (56 FR 2190, determined that the information and use appropriate for harmonization, and of the Aviation Ruf.emaking Advisory January 22, 1991} which held its first those provisions that should not be Committee and its subcommittees are meeting on May 23, 199'1 (56 FR 20492, harmonized. if any. May 3, 1991). The General Aviation and Task 4-Fiight Test: Based on the necessary in the public interest in connection with the performance of Business Airplane Subcommittee was results of the Task 1 review, identify the established at that meeting to provide changes to Subparts A, Band G ofFAR duties imposed on tM FAA by faw. advice and recommendations to the 23 that are appropriate for Meetings of the fuD committee and any Director, Aircraft Certification Service, harmonization. and those provisions subcommittees will be open to the FAA. regarding the airworthiness that should not be harmonized, if any. public except as authorized by section standards for standard and commuter Task 5-Airframe: Based on the results tO( d) of the Federal Advisory Committee category airplanes and engines in pen of the Task 1 review, identify the Act. Meetings o( the JAR/FAR 23 23 of the Federal Aviation-Regulations. changes to Subparts C and D ofFAR 23 Harmonization Working Group wi11 not and parallel provisions of parts 91 and that are appropriate for harmonization. be open to th~ pttbiH:, except to the 135 of the Federal Aviation ReguiatioDs. and those provisions. that should not be extent that individuals with an interest The FAA announced at the Joint harmonized, if any. and expertise 1m! selected to pttrtfcipate. Aviation Authorities GAA)-Federal No public announcement of working Aviation Administration (FAA) Reports group meetiJ18B wiH be made. Harmonization Conference in Toronto, A. Reconunend time line(sJ for Issued in Washington. DC. on November Ontario, Canada, (June 2-5, 1992} that it completion of each task, lnc:ltrdtng 19,199%. would consolidate within the Aviation rationale, for Subcommittee William J. Sullivan. Rulemaking Advisory Comnmtee consideration at the meefins of the Executive Director. CAMml A riQlKJn Qnd structure an ongoing objective to subcommittee held following publication Business Airplane Su"ommjUee. Aviation "harmonize" the Joint Aviation of this notice. Rulemolcin6 Advisory Commitlee. Requirements (JAR} and the Federal B. Give a detailed presentation fo the [FR Doc. 92-28931 Filed 11-27-92~8:45 am} Aviation Regulations (FAR). Coincident subcommittee of the results of Task I 81WHG COOE ._.,,_. with that announcement, the FAA before proceeding with Tasks 2-5. assigned to the General Aviation and C. Give a detailed conceptual Busine98 Airplane Subcommittee tho&e presentation on Taaks z-s to the rulemaking projects related to JAR/FAR · Subcommittee before proceedtna with 23 Harmonization which were then in the work stated under ftem D. below. the proc:esa of being coordinated Each presentation should identify what between the JAA and the FAA. The proposed amendments will be included Harmonization process included the in each notice. and whether any intention to present the results of JAA/ additioDal notices wiR be need to be FAA coordination to the pllblic ill the drafted in addition to the four identified form of a Notice of Proposed in item D. below. These reports ma:y be Rulemaking-an objective comparable combined or presented separately at the discretion of the working aroup chair. Recommendation Letter ------ ----------------------------------~ 1.1 Mr. Anthony Broderick 208 Patterson St. Associate Administration for Regulation Falls Church, VA 22046 and Certification-A VR-1 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave. Washington DC, 20591 March 1, 1994 Dear Mr. Broderick: The ARAC, General Aviation and Business Aircraft Issues Group met on February 8, 1994. It was the group recommendation that the enclosed Airframe, Flight, Powerplant and Systems JAR/FAR 23 Harmonization Draft Notices should be forwarded to FAA Washington for publication. Each notice has been reviewed and endorsed by FAA Kansas City and Washington Legal and is accompanied by an executive summary and economic analysis prepared by FAA. Also enclosed is a JAA letter to FAA dated January 20, 1994 to which is attached a table indicating the European study group disposition concerning text differences between JAR and FAR 23 following their review of notices 3 and 4 and the associated four draft harmonization notices. The FAA responses to the items listed which were endorsed by the issues group are also enclosed. As you can see the JAR/FAR 23 and ARAC Working Groups with the support of the Kansas City Technical staff and the relevant FAA Staff in Washington have carried out an extremely thorough review over a considerable period of time. As you are undoubtedly aware prior to the formation of the four ARAC Working Groups, GAMA, AECMA, JAA, and the FAA had been working The JAR/FAR 23 Harmonization Program for approximately 2 years. i I believe all the people involved should be highly commended for a difficult and painstaking job very well done. In view of the importance of the overall harmonization program every effort should be made to publish the NPRMS prior to the Annual JAA/FAA meeting in June . •I Bernard Brown Asst. Chair, GABA Issues Group cc John Colomy - FAA, Kansas City Jim Dougherty - GAMA Claude Schmitt - AECMA Alain Leroy - JAA Recommendation ---------------- [4910-13] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 23 [Docket No. ; Notice No. 1 RIN: 2120- Airworthiness Standards; Flight Proposals Based on European Joint Aviation Requirements Proposals AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. SUMMARY: This notice proposes changes to the flight airworthiness standards for normal, utility,