DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Amendments 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 2020/2007(INI) 30.10.2020 AMENDMENTS 1 - 86 Draft opinion Morten Løkkegaard (PE657.157v01-00) Impacts of EU rules on the free movements of workers and services: intra-EU labour mobility as a tool to match labour market needs and skills (2020/2007(INI)) AM\1215391EN.docx PE658.913v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegOpinion PE658.913v01-00 2/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Evelyne Gebhardt, Sándor Rónai, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Marc Angel, Petra Kammerevert, Christel Schaldemose, Maria Grapini Draft opinion Recital A Draft opinion Amendment A. whereas the Professional A. whereas the Professional Qualifications Directive (PQD) explicitly Qualifications Directive (PQD) seeks to seeks to harness intra-EU mobility to enable professionals to work or establish match labour market needs and skills themselves across the Union and to make across the Union by making it easier for it easier for workers of certain professions workers of certain professions to find to find employment in different Member employment in different Member States; States; Or. en Amendment 2 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Romana Tomc Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Draft opinion Amendment Aa. whereas the Professional Qualifications Directive facilitates the intra-EU labour mobility and the Services Directive realises the free movement of services, but the full potential of the single market for services and professionals can still be further improved and developed and the barriers for the free movement of services and professionals removed; Or. en Amendment 3 Rasmus Andresen on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group AM\1215391EN.docx 3/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Draft opinion Amendment Aa. whereas the free movement of workers is a fundamental principle of the European Union, a right for all citizens and essential to the proper functioning of the internal market; whereas labour mobility should not only be free but also fair and underlined with solid rights so as to create a true level playing field; Or. en Amendment 4 Dan-Ştefan Motreanu Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Draft opinion Amendment Aa. whereas different regulatory choices at both the European and national level, imperfect and inadequate transposition of relevant directives, excessive requirements, lack of clear rules and fragmentation create the obstacles to fully benefit from the free movement of workers and services; Or. en Amendment 5 Jordi Cañas Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Draft opinion Amendment Aa. whereas mutual recognition of skills and qualifications is key to support PE658.913v01-00 4/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN mobility, long-life learning and career opportunities for all across the EU, including people with disabilities, thereby contributing to the free movement of services in the Single Market; Or. en Amendment 6 Adam Bielan, Beata Mazurek, Kosma Złotowski, Dominik Tarczyński Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Draft opinion Amendment Aa. whereas the European Professional Card enhances safe professional mobility and creates a framework for a simpler, faster and more transparent recognition of the qualifications; Or. en Amendment 7 Sándor Rónai, Maria Grapini, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Christel Schaldemose, Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Draft opinion Amendment Aa. whereas the free movement of workers and services are essential for a well-functioning single market; Or. en Amendment 8 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Romana Tomc AM\1215391EN.docx 5/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN Draft opinion Recital A b (new) Draft opinion Amendment Ab. whereas the COVID-19 crisis has caused an unprecedented economic crisis, and unlocking the full potential of the single market as well as enhancing the free movement of workers and services by making full use of the mutual recognition of professional qualifications and freedom to provide services under the Services Directive can facilitate the recovery process and put the economy back on track after the crisis; Or. en Amendment 9 Dan-Ştefan Motreanu Draft opinion Recital A b (new) Draft opinion Amendment Ab. whereas the Council has adopted a recommendation on a coordinated approach to the restrictions of free movement in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which aims at increasing the transparency and predictability of free movement across the EU for both citizens and enterprises; Or. en Amendment 10 Sándor Rónai, Maria Grapini, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Christel Schaldemose, Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt Draft opinion Recital A b (new) PE658.913v01-00 6/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN Draft opinion Amendment Ab. whereas the Services Directive, the Professional Qualifications Directive and the Proportionality Test Directive laid down the provisions that ensure the proper functioning of the internal market, while guaranteeing a high level of workers and consumer protection; Or. en Amendment 11 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Romana Tomc Draft opinion Recital A c (new) Draft opinion Amendment Ac. whereas different regulatory choices at both the European and national level, imperfect and inadequate transposition of relevant directives, excessive requirements, lack of clear rules and fragmentation create the obstacles to fully benefit from the free movement of workers and services; Or. en Amendment 12 Sándor Rónai, Maria Grapini, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Christel Schaldemose, Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt Draft opinion Recital A c (new) Draft opinion Amendment Ac. whereas a single market with high social and environmental standards, quality services and fair competition AM\1215391EN.docx 7/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN serves the interests of all stakeholders; Or. en Amendment 13 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Romana Tomc Draft opinion Recital A d (new) Draft opinion Amendment Ad. whereas in March 2020 the Commission has issued the Guidelines concerning the exercise of the free movement of workers during COVID-19 outbreak, which sets out the principles for an integrated approach to effective internal borders management to protect public health while preserving the integrity of the internal market; Or. en Amendment 14 Sándor Rónai, Maria Grapini, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Christel Schaldemose, Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt Draft opinion Recital A d (new) Draft opinion Amendment Ad. whereas the economic recovery from the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has to be in accordance with the guidelines set out by the European Green Deal and not at the expense of social or workers’ rights; Or. en PE658.913v01-00 8/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN Amendment 15 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Romana Tomc Draft opinion Recital A e (new) Draft opinion Amendment Ae. whereas the Council has adopted a recommendation on a coordinated approach to the restrictions of free movement in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which aims at increasing the transparency and predictability of free movement across the EU for both citizens and enterprises; Or. en Amendment 16 Rasmus Andresen on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Highlights that, in the present 1. Highlights that, in the present health crisis, free movement of workers in health crisis, free movement of workers, the field of health services clearly not only in the field of health services, demonstrates the benefits of the PQD; clearly demonstrates the benefits of EU- wide free movement of workers and calls for this free movement to be adequately supported with rights to protect their working conditions, health and safety, especially for seasonal and cross-border workers; underlines furthermore that existing legislation concerning the access to social rights, such as social insurance, including their exportation, must be respected when workers exercise their rights to free movement; Or. en AM\1215391EN.docx 9/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN Amendment 17 Adam Bielan, Beata Mazurek, Kosma Złotowski, Dominik Tarczyński Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Highlights that, in the present 1. Highlights that, in the present health crisis, free movement of workers in health crisis, free movement of workers in the field of health services clearly the field of health services clearly demonstrates the benefits of the PQD; demonstrates the benefits of the PQD, especially given its digital elements and proven effectiveness in facilitating labour mobility1a; calls to further expand the list of professions that could be governed within the framework of the EPC to offer swift and less burdensome way of recognising qualifications for European workers; __________________ 1a Koumenta, M. and Pagliero, M., Measuring Prevalence and Labour Market Impacts of Occupational Regulation in the EU, 2016, p. 88. Or. en Amendment 18 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Romana Tomc Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Highlights that, in the present 1. Highlights that, in the present health crisis, free
Recommended publications

  • Green Deal – the Coordinators

    Green Deal – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”I want the European Green Deal to become Europe’s hallmark. At the heart of it is our commitment to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent. It is also a long-term economic imperative: those who act first European Parliament and fastest will be the ones who grasp the opportunities from the ecological transition. I want Europe to be 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 the front-runner. I want Europe to be the exporter of knowledge, technologies and best practice.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ENVI Renew Committee on Europe Dan-Ştefan Motreanu César Luena Peter Liese Jytte Guteland Nils Torvalds Silvia Sardone Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Environment, Public Health Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Food Safety Pacal Canfin Chair Bas Eickhout Anja Hazekamp Bas Eickhout Alexandr Vondra Silvia Modig Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe EPP ITRE Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław Krasnodębski Marisa Matias Vice-Chair Vice-Chair
  • Bucharest Meeting Summary

    Bucharest Meeting Summary

    PC 242 PC 17 E Original: English NATO Parliamentary Assembly SUMMARY of the meeting of the Political Committee Plenary Hall, Chamber of Deputies, The Parliament (Senate and Chamber of Deputies) of Romania Bucharest, Romania Saturday 7 and Sunday 8 October 2017 www.nato-pa.int November 2017 242 PC 17 E ATTENDANCE LIST Committee Chairperson Ojars Eriks KALNINS (Latvia) General Rapporteur Rasa JUKNEVICIENE (Lithuania) Rapporteur, Sub-Committee on Gerald E. CONNOLLY (United States) Transatlantic Relations Rapporteur, Sub-Committee on Julio MIRANDA CALHA (Portugal) NATO Partnerships President of the NATO PA Paolo ALLI (Italy) Secretary General of the NATO PA David HOBBS Member delegations Albania Mimi KODHELI Xhemal QEFALIA Perparim SPAHIU Gent STRAZIMIRI Belgium Peter BUYSROGGE Karolien GROSEMANS Sébastian PIRLOT Damien THIERY Luk VAN BIESEN Karl VANLOUWE Veli YÜKSEL Bulgaria Plamen MANUSHEV Simeon SIMEONOV Canada Raynell ANDREYCHUK Joseph A. DAY Larry MILLER Marc SERRÉ Borys WRZESNEWSKYJ Czech Republic Milan SARAPATKA Denmark Peter Juel JENSEN Estonia Marko MIHKELSON France Philippe FOLLIOT Sonia KRIMI Gilbert ROGER Germany Karin EVERS-MEYER Karl A. LAMERS Anita SCHÄFER Greece Spyridon DANELLIS Christos KARAGIANNIDIS Meropi TZOUFI Hungary Mihaly BALLA Karoly TUZES Italy Antonino BOSCO Andrea MANCIULLI Andrea MARTELLA Roberto MORASSUT Vito VATTUONE i 242 PC 17 E Latvia Aleksandrs KIRSTEINS Lithuania Ausrine ARMONAITE Luxembourg Alexander KRIEPS Netherlands Herman SCHAPER Norway Liv Signe NAVARSETE Poland Waldemar ANDZEL Adam BIELAN Przemyslaw
  • En En Joint Motion for a Resolution

    En En Joint Motion for a Resolution

    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0236/2021 } B9-0237/2021 } B9-0250/2021 } B9-0251/2021 } B9-0252/2021 } RC1 28.4.2021 JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 132(2) and (4) of the Rules of Procedure replacing the following motions: B9-0236/2021 (Verts/ALE) B9-0237/2021 (Renew) B9-0250/2021 (S&D) B9-0251/2021 (PPE) B9-0252/2021 (ECR) on Russia, the case of Alexei Navalny, the military build-up on Ukraine’s border and Russian attacks in the Czech Republic (2021/2642(RSP)) Michael Gahler, Željana Zovko, Andrius Kubilius, Sandra Kalniete, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Andrzej Halicki, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Miriam Lexmann, David Lega, Rasa Juknevičienė, Jerzy Buzek, Riho Terras, Arba Kokalari, Tomáš Zdechovský, Luděk Niedermayer, Vladimír Bilčík, Traian Băsescu, Jiří Pospíšil, Stanislav Polčák, Eugen Tomac, Michaela Šojdrová on behalf of the PPE Group RC\1230259EN.docx PE692.492v01-00 } PE692.493v01-00 } PE692.506v01-00 } PE692.507v01-00 } PE692.508v01-00 } RC1 EN United in diversityEN Marek Belka, Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz, Tonino Picula on behalf of the S&D Group Bernard Guetta, Petras Auštrevičius, Dita Charanzová, Olivier Chastel, Vlad Gheorghe, Klemen Grošelj, Moritz Körner, Dragoș Pîslaru, Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Michal Šimečka, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Ramona Strugariu, Dragoş Tudorache on behalf of the Renew Group Sergey Lagodinsky on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Anna Fotyga, Veronika Vrecionová, Ruža Tomašić, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Witold Jan Waszczykowski, Elżbieta Rafalska, Hermann Tertsch, Charlie
  • Download PDF Version

    Download PDF Version

    Next weekend in New Direction 10th Anniversary Dinner p.22 BORDEAUX p.20 ACRE Summer Gala Dinner p.23 Issue #8 | July 2019 A fortnightly Newspaper by the Alliance of Conservatives and Reformists in Europe (ACRE) | theconservative.online THE OFFICIAL OPPOSITION by Jan Zahradil MEP, President of ACRE For the next five years, we aim to serve as the peoples voice, acting as a counter balance between those who want a federal Europe, and those who want to destroy the Union. We will continue to defend the view that Europe works best when it does less, but it does it better. ith the elec- power handed to those who which would have create a in a position to act as the offi- comes as a result of keeping tion now out of want to use it to build a federal more business friendly Europe. cial opposition in the European power as close to the people as Spitzenkandidat the way, and the Europe. A coalition that will That would have put the sin- Parliament. We’ll hold this new possible. And we remain com- JAN ZAHRADIL political groups be led from the left, with any gle market, rather than social coalition to account, and ensure mitted to the view that our nowW establishing themselves, we voting majority dependent on policy, back at the centre of the that they do not use their new strength comes from a willing- Jan Zahradil was ACRE’s can- can now talk with some clarity the support of the Greens and European Union. That would majority to take power away ness to work together on issues didate for the Presidency of the about what the next five years the socialists.
  • Radiopodlasie.Pl Wygenerowano W Dniu 2021-09-25 10:49:22

    Radiopodlasie.Pl Wygenerowano W Dniu 2021-09-25 10:49:22

    Radiopodlasie.pl Wygenerowano w dniu 2021-09-25 10:49:22 Kto wejdzie do PE? Karol Karski, Krzysztof Jurgiel, Adam Bielan, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk, Elżbieta Kruk i Beata Mazurek(PiS), Tomasz Frankowski, Jarosław Kalinowski i Krzysztof Hetman (KE)- najprawdopodobniej wejdą do Parlamentu Europejskiego. Wszyscy kandydowali w okręgach obejmujących nasz region. Prognozy są oparte na sondażu exit-poll, co oznacza, że nazwiska kandydatów, którzy obejmą mandaty, mogą się jeszcze zmienić. Prawdopodobne nazwiska europarlamentarzystów podaje Informacyjna Agencja Radiowa. Prawo i Sprawiedliwość zdobyło najwięcej, 42,4 procent głosów, w wyborach do Parlamentu Europejskiego - wynika z sondażu exit-poll zrealizowanego przez IPSOS dla telewizji TVP, Polsat i TVN. Drugie miejsce w badaniu prowadzonym dziś przed lokalami wyborczymi zajęła Koalicja Europejska - 39,1 procent. Jeśli wyniki sondażu potwierdzą się, do Parlamentu Europejskiego dostaną się także kandydaci Wiosny - 6,6 procent oraz Konfederacji - 6,1 procent. Pięcioprocentowego prgu nie przekroczyły komitety Kukiz'15 - 4,1 procent oraz Lewica Razem - 1,3 procent. Prognozowana frekwencja wyniosła 43 procent - wynika z sondażu exit-poll. Zgodnie z sondażem, Prawo i Sprawiedliwość wygrało w siedmiu okręgach (warmińsko-mazurskie z podlaskim, Mazowsze, Łódzkie, Lubelskie, Podkarpacie, Małopolska ze Świętokrzyskiem oraz Śląsk). W sześciu okręgach wygrała Koalicja Europejska (Pomorze, kujawsko-pomorskie, Warszawa, Wielkopolska, Dolny Śląsk z Opolszczyzną oraz Lubuskie z Zachodniopomorskim). Z prognozy podziału mandatów wynika, że przy takich wynikach, jakie przyniósł sondaż exit-poll, PiS miałby w Parlamencie Europejskim 24 mandaty, Koalicja Europejska - 22 mandaty, a Wiosna i Konfederacja - po trzy mandaty. Zgodnie z sondażem, w okręgu obejmującym Pomorze dwa mandaty zdobyła Koalicja Europejska (Magdalena Adamowicz oraz najprawdopodobniej Janusz Lewandowski), a jeden Prawo i Sprawiedliwość (najprawdopodobniej Anna Fotyga).
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)

    A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)

    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
  • Media and Communication in Europe

    Media and Communication in Europe

    Media and Communication in Europe Edited by Agnieszka Stepinska Media and Communication in Europe logoV Editor of the book: Agnieszka Stêpiñska Reviewer: Prof. dr hab. Dorota Piontek Typesetting: Ryszard Skrzeczyñski Book cover: Bartosz Stêpiñski The book was sponsored by the National Science Center, Poland (grant no. NN 166 614440) The electronic version of this book is freely available under CC BY-SA 4.0 licence, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched (KU). KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access for the public good. More information about the initiative and links to the Open Access version can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH Gubener Str. 47, D-10243 Berlin, Germany, phone: +49 30 428 51090 www.logos-verlag.de © Copyright by Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH 2014 All rights reserved ISBN 978-3-8325-3680-0 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. 5 Table of Contents Preface ........................ 7 Part I European Public Sphere Anke Offerhaus, Anne Mollen, Andreas Hepp: Nationalizing Europe Regionally – The Europeanization of Public Spheres in Regional Newspaper Reporting and the “Crisis” in Europe ....... 13 Knut De Swert, Julie De Smedt: Hosting Europe, Covering Europe? Domestication in the EU-Coverage on Belgian Television News (2003–2012) ..................... 33 Veronika Pitrová: Towards Cosmopolitan Europeans: Covering Europe for the Young Audience on Public Service Broadcasting in the Netherlands and United Kingdom ............. 45 Javier Ruiz Soler: The Role of the Euroblogosphere in a Context of the European Public Sphere .............
  • Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej

    Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej

    CENTRUM BADANIA OPINII SPOŁECZNEJ SEKRETARIAT 629 - 35 - 69, 628 - 37 - 04 UL. ŻURAWIA 4A, SKR. PT.24 OŚRODEK INFORMACJI 693 - 46 - 92, 625 - 76 - 23 00 - 503 W A R S Z A W A TELEFAX 629 - 40 - 89 INTERNET http://www.cbos.pl E-mail: [email protected] BS/49/2009 SPOŁECZNY ODBIÓR POLSKICH PRZEDSTAWICIELI W INSTYTUCJACH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ ORAZ OPINIE O PRACY EUROPOSŁA KOMUNIKAT Z BADAŃ WARSZAWA, MARZEC 2009 PRZEDRUK I ROZPOWSZECHNIANIE MATERIAŁÓW CBOS W CAŁOŚCI LUB W CZĘŚCI ORAZ WYKORZYSTANIE DANYCH EMPIRYCZNYCH JEST DOZWOLONE WYŁĄCZNIE Z PODANIEM ŹRÓDŁA SPOŁECZNY ODBIÓR POLSKICH PRZEDSTAWICIELI W INSTYTUCJACH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ ORAZ OPINIE O PRACY EUROPOSŁA ¾ Co drugi badany uważa, że polscy europosłowie dobrze reprezentują Polskę i Polaków (51%) oraz należycie dbają o interesy kraju (50%), a ponad dwie piąte ankietowanych (43%) sądzi, że intensywnie działają na forum Parlamentu Europejskiego. ¾ Najlepiej odbieranym przedstawicielem naszego kraju w insty- tucjach unijnych jest komisarz Unii Europejskiej do spraw polityki regionalnej Danuta Hübner, natomiast największą nieufność wzbudza eurodeputowany LPR Maciej Giertych. ¾ Połowa Polaków uważa, że sprawowanie mandatu europosła daje politykom duże możliwości działania na rzecz kraju i wspierania polskich interesów. ¾ Niejednoznaczne pozostają opinie na temat ilości pracy i obowiąz- ków, jakie wiążą się z funkcją europarlamentarzysty. CZY, PANA(I) ZDANIEM, SPRAWOWANIE MANDATU EUROPOSŁA: wiąże się z dużą ilością pracy i obowiązków 37% Trudno 22% powiedzieć 41% tak naprawdę europosłowie niewiele mają do roboty Badanie „Aktualne problemy i wydarzenia” (226), 4–10 marca 2009 roku, reprezentatywna próba losowa dorosłych mieszkańców Polski (N=979). Na początku czerwca Polacy po raz drugi wybiorą swoich przedstawicieli do Parlamentu Europejskiego. Będzie to jednocześnie pierwszy od października 2007 roku realny test poparcia dla ugrupowań partyjnych funkcjonujących na polskiej scenie politycznej.
  • Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action

    Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action

    Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%).
  • Digital Age – the Coordinators

    Digital Age – the Coordinators

    Digital Age – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”Digitalisation has a huge impact on the way we live, work and communicate. In some fields, Europe has to catch up – like for business to consumers – while in others we are frontrunners – such as in business to business. We have European Parliament to make our single market fit for the digital age, we need to make the most of artificial intelligence and big data, 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 we have to improve on cybersecurity and we have to work hard for our technological sovereignty.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe Greens/EFA IMCO Róża Thun und Hohenstein Maria Grapini Andreas Schwab Christel Schaldemose Dita Charanzová Virginie Joron Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Internal Market and Consumer S&D Renew Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL Petra De Sutter Europe Protection Chair Maria Manuel Leitão Marques Pierre Karleskind Marcel Kolaja Adam Bielan Kateřina Konečná Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ITRE EPP Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław
  • Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 9 Lutego 2010 R

    Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 9 Lutego 2010 R

    C 110 E/16 PL Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej 29.4.2010 Wtorek, 9 lutego 2010 r. PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 9 LUTEGO 2010 R. (2010/C 110 E/02) Spis treści Strona 1. Otwarcie posiedzenia . 17 2. Składanie dokumentów . 17 3. Debata nad przypadkami łamania praw człowieka, zasad demokracji i państwa prawa (ogło­ szenie o złożonych projektach rezolucji) . 17 4. Przedstawienie kolegium komisarzy i oświadczenie nt. porozumienia ramowego w sprawie stosunków Parlamentu Europejskiego z Komisją Europejską (debata) . 18 5. Głosowanie . 19 5.1. Porozumienie ramowe w sprawie stosunków Parlamentu Europejskiego z Komisją Euro­ pejską (głosowanie) . 19 6. Głosowanie (ciąg dalszy) . 20 6.1. Przedstawienie kolegium komisarzy (głosowanie) . 20 6.2. Wybór Komisji Europejskiej (głosowanie) . 20 7. Wyjaśnienia dotyczące sposobu głosowania . 20 8. Korekty do głosowania i zamiar głosowania . 21 9. Przyjęcie protokołu poprzedniego posiedzenia . 21 10. Trudna sytuacja finansowa, gospodarcza i społeczna państw strefy euro (debata) . 21 11. Postępy w procesie przenoszenia więźniów z Guantánamo i zamknięcia więzienia w Guantánamo (debata) . 22 12. Główne cele konferencji stron konwencji CITES (debata) . 22 13. EFRR: kwalifikowanie interwencji w zakresie mieszkalnictwa dla społeczności zepchniętych na margines ***I (debata) . 23 14. Porządek obrad następnego posiedzenia . 24 15. Zamknięcie posiedzenia . 24 LISTA OBECNOŚCI . 25 ZAŁĄCZNIK I WYNIKI GŁOSOWANIA . 27 1. Porozumienie ramowe w sprawie stosunków Parlamentu Europejskiego z Komisją Europejską 27 2. Przedstawienie kolegium komisarzy . 28 3. Wybór Komisji Europejskiej . 28 ZAŁĄCZNIK II WYNIKI GŁOSOWAŃ IMIENNYCH . 29 1. B7-0089/2010 – Przedstawienie kolegium komisarzy – REZOLUCJA . 29 2. B7-0090/2010/rev – Wybór Komisji Europejskiej – DECYZJA . 30 29.4.2010 PL Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 110 E/17 Wtorek, 9 lutego 2010 r.
  • Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 27 Listopada 2019 R. (2021/C 203/03)

    Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 27 Listopada 2019 R. (2021/C 203/03)

    28.5.2021 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej C 203/155 Środa, 27 listopada 2019 r. PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 27 LISTOPADA 2019 R. (2021/C 203/03) Spis treści Strona 1. Otwarcie posiedzenia . 157 2. Debata nad przypadkami łamania praw człowieka, zasad demokracji i państwa prawa (ogłoszenie złożonych 157 projektów rezolucji) . 3. Przedstawienie kolegium komisarzy i ich programu przez nowo wybraną przewodniczącą Komisji (debata) 158 4. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 159 5. Oficjalne powitanie . 159 6. Głosowanie . 159 6.1. Wybór Komisji (głosowanie) . 160 6.2. Uruchomienie Funduszu Solidarności Unii Europejskiej w celu udzielenia pomocy Grecji 160 (głosowanie) . 6.3. Uruchomienie instrumentu elastyczności na sfinansowanie natychmiastowych środków budżeto- wych służących do rozwiązywania bieżących problemów wynikających z migracji, napływu 160 uchodźców i zagrożeń bezpieczeństwa (głosowanie) . 6.4. Uruchomienie Funduszu Solidarności Unii Europejskiej w celu zapewnienia środków na wypłatę 161 zaliczek w budżecie ogólnym Unii na 2020 r. (głosowanie) . 6.5. Procedura budżetowa 2020: wspólny projekt (głosowanie) . 161 7. Wyjaśnienia dotyczące stanowiska zajętego w głosowaniu . 161 8. Korekty oddanych głosów i zgłoszenia zamiaru oddania głosu . 162 9. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 162 10. Zatwierdzenie protokołu poprzedniego posiedzenia . 162 11. Akty delegowane (art. 111 ust. 2 Regulaminu) . 162 12. Środki wykonawcze (art. 112 Regulaminu) . 163 13. Składanie dokumentów . 163 14. Przesunięcia środków i decyzje budżetowe . 164 15. Ingerencja innych państw w nasze procesy demokratyczne i wyborcze (debata na aktualny temat) . 164 C 203/156 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej 28.5.2021 Środa, 27 listopada 2019 r. Spis treści Strona 16. Sytuacja w krajach sąsiedztwa wschodniego (debata) . 165 17. Sytuacja w Izraelu i Palestynie, w tym w osiedlach żydowskich (debata) .