European Parliament 2019-2024

Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection

2020/2007(INI)

30.10.2020

AMENDMENTS 1 - 86

Draft opinion Morten Løkkegaard (PE657.157v01-00)

Impacts of EU rules on the free movements of workers and services: intra-EU labour mobility as a tool to match labour market needs and skills (2020/2007(INI))

AM\1215391EN.docx PE658.913v01-00

EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegOpinion

PE658.913v01-00 2/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Evelyne Gebhardt, Sándor Rónai, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Marc Angel, Petra Kammerevert, Christel Schaldemose, Maria Grapini

Draft opinion Recital A

Draft opinion Amendment

A. whereas the Professional A. whereas the Professional Qualifications Directive (PQD) explicitly Qualifications Directive (PQD) seeks to seeks to harness intra-EU mobility to enable professionals to work or establish match labour market needs and skills themselves across the Union and to make across the Union by making it easier for it easier for workers of certain professions workers of certain professions to find to find employment in different Member employment in different Member States; States;

Or. en

Amendment 2 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Romana Tomc

Draft opinion Recital A a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

Aa. whereas the Professional Qualifications Directive facilitates the intra-EU labour mobility and the Services Directive realises the free movement of services, but the full potential of the single market for services and professionals can still be further improved and developed and the barriers for the free movement of services and professionals removed;

Or. en

Amendment 3 Rasmus Andresen on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

AM\1215391EN.docx 3/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN Draft opinion Recital A a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

Aa. whereas the free movement of workers is a fundamental principle of the European Union, a right for all citizens and essential to the proper functioning of the internal market; whereas labour mobility should not only be free but also fair and underlined with solid rights so as to create a true level playing field;

Or. en

Amendment 4 Dan-Ştefan Motreanu

Draft opinion Recital A a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

Aa. whereas different regulatory choices at both the European and national level, imperfect and inadequate transposition of relevant directives, excessive requirements, lack of clear rules and fragmentation create the obstacles to fully benefit from the free movement of workers and services;

Or. en

Amendment 5 Jordi Cañas

Draft opinion Recital A a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

Aa. whereas mutual recognition of skills and qualifications is key to support

PE658.913v01-00 4/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN mobility, long-life learning and career opportunities for all across the EU, including people with disabilities, thereby contributing to the free movement of services in the Single Market;

Or. en

Amendment 6 Adam Bielan, Beata Mazurek, Kosma Złotowski, Dominik Tarczyński

Draft opinion Recital A a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

Aa. whereas the European Professional Card enhances safe professional mobility and creates a framework for a simpler, faster and more transparent recognition of the qualifications;

Or. en

Amendment 7 Sándor Rónai, Maria Grapini, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Christel Schaldemose, Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt

Draft opinion Recital A a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

Aa. whereas the free movement of workers and services are essential for a well-functioning single market;

Or. en

Amendment 8 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Romana Tomc

AM\1215391EN.docx 5/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN Draft opinion Recital A b (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

Ab. whereas the COVID-19 crisis has caused an unprecedented economic crisis, and unlocking the full potential of the single market as well as enhancing the free movement of workers and services by making full use of the mutual recognition of professional qualifications and freedom to provide services under the Services Directive can facilitate the recovery process and put the economy back on track after the crisis;

Or. en

Amendment 9 Dan-Ştefan Motreanu

Draft opinion Recital A b (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

Ab. whereas the Council has adopted a recommendation on a coordinated approach to the restrictions of free movement in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which aims at increasing the transparency and predictability of free movement across the EU for both citizens and enterprises;

Or. en

Amendment 10 Sándor Rónai, Maria Grapini, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Christel Schaldemose, Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt

Draft opinion Recital A b (new)

PE658.913v01-00 6/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN Draft opinion Amendment

Ab. whereas the Services Directive, the Professional Qualifications Directive and the Proportionality Test Directive laid down the provisions that ensure the proper functioning of the internal market, while guaranteeing a high level of workers and consumer protection;

Or. en

Amendment 11 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Romana Tomc

Draft opinion Recital A c (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

Ac. whereas different regulatory choices at both the European and national level, imperfect and inadequate transposition of relevant directives, excessive requirements, lack of clear rules and fragmentation create the obstacles to fully benefit from the free movement of workers and services;

Or. en

Amendment 12 Sándor Rónai, Maria Grapini, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Christel Schaldemose, Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt

Draft opinion Recital A c (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

Ac. whereas a single market with high social and environmental standards, quality services and fair competition

AM\1215391EN.docx 7/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN serves the interests of all stakeholders;

Or. en

Amendment 13 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Romana Tomc

Draft opinion Recital A d (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

Ad. whereas in March 2020 the Commission has issued the Guidelines concerning the exercise of the free movement of workers during COVID-19 outbreak, which sets out the principles for an integrated approach to effective internal borders management to protect public health while preserving the integrity of the internal market;

Or. en

Amendment 14 Sándor Rónai, Maria Grapini, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Christel Schaldemose, Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt

Draft opinion Recital A d (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

Ad. whereas the economic recovery from the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has to be in accordance with the guidelines set out by the European Green Deal and not at the expense of social or workers’ rights;

Or. en

PE658.913v01-00 8/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN Amendment 15 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Romana Tomc

Draft opinion Recital A e (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

Ae. whereas the Council has adopted a recommendation on a coordinated approach to the restrictions of free movement in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which aims at increasing the transparency and predictability of free movement across the EU for both citizens and enterprises;

Or. en

Amendment 16 Rasmus Andresen on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Draft opinion Paragraph 1

Draft opinion Amendment

1. Highlights that, in the present 1. Highlights that, in the present health crisis, free movement of workers in health crisis, free movement of workers, the field of health services clearly not only in the field of health services, demonstrates the benefits of the PQD; clearly demonstrates the benefits of EU- wide free movement of workers and calls for this free movement to be adequately supported with rights to protect their working conditions, health and safety, especially for seasonal and cross-border workers; underlines furthermore that existing legislation concerning the access to social rights, such as social insurance, including their exportation, must be respected when workers exercise their rights to free movement;

Or. en

AM\1215391EN.docx 9/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN Amendment 17 Adam Bielan, Beata Mazurek, Kosma Złotowski, Dominik Tarczyński

Draft opinion Paragraph 1

Draft opinion Amendment

1. Highlights that, in the present 1. Highlights that, in the present health crisis, free movement of workers in health crisis, free movement of workers in the field of health services clearly the field of health services clearly demonstrates the benefits of the PQD; demonstrates the benefits of the PQD, especially given its digital elements and proven effectiveness in facilitating labour mobility1a; calls to further expand the list of professions that could be governed within the framework of the EPC to offer swift and less burdensome way of recognising qualifications for European workers; ______1a Koumenta, M. and Pagliero, M., Measuring Prevalence and Labour Market Impacts of Occupational Regulation in the EU, 2016, p. 88.

Or. en

Amendment 18 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Romana Tomc

Draft opinion Paragraph 1

Draft opinion Amendment

1. Highlights that, in the present 1. Highlights that, in the present health crisis, free movement of workers in health crisis, free movement of workers in the field of health services clearly the field of health services clearly demonstrates the benefits of the PQD; demonstrates the benefits of the PQD; recalls that the aim of PQD is to facilitate the professionals to provide their services across Europe whilst guaranteeing an

PE658.913v01-00 10/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN improved level of protection for consumers and citizens, which is particularly important during the pandemic crisis,

Or. en

Amendment 19 Kateřina Konečná

Draft opinion Paragraph 1

Draft opinion Amendment

1. Highlights that, in the present 1. Highlights that, in the present health crisis, free movement of workers in health crisis, free movement of workers in the field of health services clearly the field of health services clearly demonstrates the benefits of the PQD; demonstrates the benefits of the PQD; whereas at the same time the current crisis has shed light on and exacerbated existing short-comings in the protection of posted workers in the framework of the provision of services;

Or. en

Amendment 20 Maria Grapini

Draft opinion Paragraph 1

Draft opinion Amendment

1. Highlights that, in the present 1. Highlights that, in the present health crisis, free movement of workers in health crisis, free movement of workers in the field of health services clearly the field of health services clearly demonstrates the benefits of the PQD; demonstrates the benefits of the PQD, while also pointing to the shortcomings of these arrangements;

Or. ro

AM\1215391EN.docx 11/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN Amendment 21 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Romana Tomc

Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

1a. underlines the great importance of free movement of workers and services in overcoming the recession and increased unemployment rates caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, reiterates that further removal of the existing barriers within the single market is essential in order to fully benefit from its potential; regrets that the Recovery Plan proposed by the Commission lacks ambition when it comes to the movement of workers and services and fails to fully recognise its importance as a tool for economic recovery;

Or. en

Amendment 22 Rasmus Andresen on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

1a. Stresses that the latest decisions on travel restrictions crisis by certain Member States due to COVID19 have created uncertainty for both citizens and businesses, especially cross-border workers; calls therefore the Commission and Member States for coordination of such measures to prepare for future waves and ensure safe mobility for workers;

Or. en

PE658.913v01-00 12/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN Amendment 23 Jordi Cañas

Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

1a. Stresses the need to guarantee the comprehensive and efficient application of EU rules on the free movement of workers and services in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in order to protect both businesses and consumers, and stimulate innovation and competitiveness under fair and balanced conditions, upholding the principles of the Single Market;

Or. en

Amendment 24 Adam Bielan, Beata Mazurek, Kosma Złotowski, Dominik Tarczyński

Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

1a. Underlines, that uninterrupted mobility of health professionals and carers should be ensured where possible, in view of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as future demographic challenges;

Or. en

Amendment 25 Rasmus Andresen on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new)

AM\1215391EN.docx 13/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN Draft opinion Amendment

1b. Welcomes the Commission’s legislative proposal on minimum wages that can underpin the EU single market, especially in the services sector, and allow for a level-playing field;

Or. en

Amendment 26 Kateřina Konečná

Draft opinion Paragraph 2

Draft opinion Amendment

2. Regrets that insufficient national 2. Regrets that insufficient national implementation of existing legislation implementation of existing legislation continues to seriously hamper the free continues to seriously hamper the free mobility of workers within the EU to the mobility of workers and the effective detriment of workers and the European protection of their rights within the EU to economy as a whole; the detriment of workers and the European economy as a whole; stresses however that the free movement of workers has to be a choice rather than the outcome of economic pressure;

Or. en

Amendment 27 Sándor Rónai, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Christel Schaldemose, Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt

Draft opinion Paragraph 2

Draft opinion Amendment

2. Regrets that insufficient national 2. Highlights that workers have the implementation of existing legislation possibility to move freely across the continues to seriously hamper the free Union; however, regrets that insufficient mobility of workers within the EU to the national implementation and enforcement

PE658.913v01-00 14/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN detriment of workers and the European of current legislation still exist with economy as a whole; negative effect on the mobility of workers within the EU and the European economy as a whole;

Or. en

Amendment 28 Markus Buchheit, Isabella Tovaglieri, Alessandra Basso, Marco Campomenosi

Draft opinion Paragraph 2

Draft opinion Amendment

2. Regrets that insufficient national 2. Regrets that incomplete national implementation of existing legislation implementation of existing legislation continues to seriously hamper the free continues to hamper the free mobility of mobility of workers within the EU to the workers within the EU; detriment of workers and the European economy as a whole;

Or. en

Amendment 29 Rasmus Andresen on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Draft opinion Paragraph 2

Draft opinion Amendment

2. Regrets that insufficient national 2. Calls on Member States to fully implementation of existing legislation implement and better enforce existing continues to seriously hamper the free legislation to ensure the free mobility of mobility of workers within the EU to the workers within the EU that will benefit detriment of workers and the European workers, citizens and the European economy as a whole; economy as a whole;

Or. en

AM\1215391EN.docx 15/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN Amendment 30 Adam Bielan, Beata Mazurek, Kosma Złotowski, Dominik Tarczyński

Draft opinion Paragraph 2

Draft opinion Amendment

2. Regrets that insufficient national 2. Regrets that insufficient national implementation of existing legislation implementation of existing legislation continues to seriously hamper the free continues to seriously hamper the free mobility of workers within the EU to the mobility of workers within the EU to the detriment of workers and the European detriment of workers and the European economy as a whole; economy as a whole; urges the Members States to refrain from gold-plating the legislation in order to safeguard their markets from fair competition; points at lack of harmonised interpretation of EU law by the Member States such as the recently revised Posting of Workers Directive 2018/957/EU, which leads to lack of legal clarity and bureaucratic burdens for companies providing services in various Member States;

Or. en

Amendment 31 Maria Grapini

Draft opinion Paragraph 2

Draft opinion Amendment

2. Regrets that insufficient national 2. Regrets that insufficient national implementation of existing legislation implementation of existing legislation continues to seriously hamper the free continues to seriously hamper the free mobility of workers within the EU to the mobility of workers within the EU to the detriment of workers and the European detriment of workers and the European economy as a whole; economy as a whole, pointing out that workers in the same job and with the same responsibilities are being treated differently;

Or. ro

PE658.913v01-00 16/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN Amendment 32 Andreas Schwab, Krzysztof Hetman

Draft opinion Paragraph 2

Draft opinion Amendment

2. Regrets that insufficient national 2. Regrets that insufficient national implementation of existing legislation implementation of existing legislation continues to seriously hamper the free continues to seriously hamper the free mobility of workers within the EU to the mobility of workers within the EU to the detriment of workers and the European detriment of workers and the European economy as a whole; economy as a whole and calls on the European Commission to open infringement procedures whenever necessary;

Or. en

Amendment 33 Jordi Cañas

Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

2a. Recalls the introduction of the European Professional Card under EU legislation1a to reduce the administrative burden of recognition and further improve the qualifications recognition system of certain professions; notes its effective role in boosting the mobility of professionals across the Member States1b and considers that the Commission should assess the feasibility of extending the use of the European Professional Card in order to tackle the existing unjustified barriers that deprive citizens of jobs, consumers of choices, and entrepreneurs of opportunities in the Single Market; ______

AM\1215391EN.docx 17/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN 1a Directive 2005/36 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005, as amended by Directive 2013/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 1b Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, on the implementation of certain new elements introduced by Directive 2013/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 amending Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications and Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System ('the IMI Regulation'), {SWD(2020) 79 final}

Or. en

Amendment 34 Clara Ponsatí Obiols

Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

2a. Regrets the fact that workers who move within the EU and are covered by the rules on social security coordination face significant administrative burdens and issues such as uncertainty regarding their contributions and entitlements, and lack of exchange of data and lack of coordination between institutions, which affect the free mobility of workers; calls on Member States to enhance administrative cooperation between the competent authorities and on the Commission to foster and support such cooperation; further calls for a revision and modernization of the rules on social security coordination;

PE658.913v01-00 18/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 35 Adam Bielan, Beata Mazurek, Kosma Złotowski, Dominik Tarczyński

Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

2a. Regrets insufficient access to information with regards to mobility of services; underlines that information available on single official national websites is often provided in few languages only and limited in scope; underlines, that access to information on domestic collective agreements is especially difficult; calls on the relevant European and national authorities to take appropriate steps aimed at establishing a single template for single official national websites and to make them compatible with SDG to ease access to relevant information between different Members States;

Or. en

Amendment 36 Evelyne Gebhardt, Sándor Rónai, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Petra Kammerevert, Marc Angel, Christel Schaldemose, Maria Grapini

Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

2a. Regrets that the European Commission is not using the full potential of initiatives such as the European Professional Card as foreseen in the PQD; calls therefore upon the European Commission to extend the European Professional Card to more professions as

AM\1215391EN.docx 19/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN it offers an advantageous option for professionals who wish to work either temporarily or permanently in another Member State;

Or. en

Amendment 37 Sándor Rónai, Maria Grapini, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Christel Schaldemose, Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt

Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

2a. Recalls that regulated professions represent up to 22 % of the labour force in the EU and cover many crucial sectors, such as health and social services, business services, construction, network services, transport, tourism, real estate, public services and education.1a ______1a A8-0401/2017.

Or. en

Amendment 38 Sándor Rónai, Andreas Schieder, Christel Schaldemose, Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt

Draft opinion Paragraph 3

Draft opinion Amendment

3. Stresses that while it is a 3. Stresses that regulation of competence of Member States to regulate professions is often indispensable to a certain profession, they must respect the safeguard public interest objectives, such limits of the principles of non- as public security, public health, discrimination and proportionality, as consumer protection, or protection of the explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality environment, and deregulation must not Test Directive; be an aim for the future of the regulation of professions at the EU level; recalls

PE658.913v01-00 20/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN though, for regulation to be fair for the professionals and to enable mobility within the EU, Member States must respect the limits of the principles of non- discrimination and proportionality, and be transparent about the regulation they put in, as explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality Test Directive; encourages the Member States to exchange the information with other Member States on matters covered by the Directive;

Or. en

Amendment 39 Maria Grapini

Draft opinion Paragraph 3

Draft opinion Amendment

3. Stresses that while it is a 3. Stresses that while it is a competence of Member States to regulate a competence of Member States to regulate a certain profession, they must respect the certain profession, they must respect the limits of the principles of non- limits of the principles of non- discrimination and proportionality, as discrimination on grounds of gender, explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality religion, race, ethnicity and age, and Test Directive; proportionality, as explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality Test Directive;

Or. ro

Amendment 40 Rasmus Andresen on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Draft opinion Paragraph 3

Draft opinion Amendment

3. Stresses that while it is a 3. Stresses that regulation on access competence of Member States to regulate to and exercise of professions may be a certain profession, they must respect the necessary and legitimate for the

AM\1215391EN.docx 21/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN limits of the principles of non- protection of public interest and protect discrimination and proportionality, as workers and consumers; explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality Test Directive;

Or. en

Amendment 41 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Romana Tomc

Draft opinion Paragraph 3

Draft opinion Amendment

3. Stresses that while it is a 3. Stresses that while it is a competence of Member States to regulate a competence of Member States to regulate a certain profession, they must respect the certain profession, they must respect the limits of the principles of non- limits of the principles of non- discrimination and proportionality, as discrimination and proportionality, as explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality Test Directive; Test Directive; calls on the Commission to provide structured assistance and issue guidance to Member States on how to conduct ex-ante proportionality assessments of new national regulation of services according to the Proportionality Test Directive;

Or. en

Amendment 42 Dan-Ştefan Motreanu

Draft opinion Paragraph 3

Draft opinion Amendment

3. Stresses that while it is a 3. Stresses that while it is a competence of Member States to regulate a competence of Member States to regulate a certain profession, they must respect the certain profession, they must respect the limits of the principles of non- limits of the principles of non- discrimination and proportionality, as discrimination and proportionality, as

PE658.913v01-00 22/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality Test Directive; Test Directive; calls on the Commission to provide structured assistance and issue guidance to Member States on how to conduct ex-ante proportionality assessments of new national regulation of services according to the Proportionality Test Directive;

Or. en

Amendment 43 Markus Buchheit, Isabella Tovaglieri, Alessandra Basso, Marco Campomenosi

Draft opinion Paragraph 3

Draft opinion Amendment

3. Stresses that while it is a 3. Stresses that while it is a competence of Member States to regulate a competence of Member States to regulate a certain profession, they must respect the certain profession, they must respect the limits of the principles of non- limits of the principles of non- discrimination and proportionality, as discrimination and proportionality, as explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality Test Directive; Test Directive; regrets that the assessment of proportionality is rarely carried out; calls on the Commission to define the concept of proportionality more precisely and to provide Member States with practical guidelines for its application;

Or. en

Amendment 44 Kateřina Konečná

Draft opinion Paragraph 3

Draft opinion Amendment

3. Stresses that while it is a 3. Stresses that while it is a competence of Member States to regulate a competence of Member States to regulate a certain profession, they must respect the certain profession, they must respect the

AM\1215391EN.docx 23/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN limits of the principles of non- limits of the principles of non- discrimination and proportionality, as discrimination and proportionality, as explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality Test Directive; Test Directive; while at the same time also recognising regulation on grounds of public interest objectives;

Or. en

Amendment 45 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Romana Tomc

Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

3a. Calls on the Member States to reduce bureaucratic obstacles, and, as quickly as possible, make it possible to obtain electronically the documents needed for the cross-border provision of services as well as facilitate the cross- border activities of workers in regulated professions;

Or. en

Amendment 46 Dan-Ştefan Motreanu

Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

3a. Calls on the Member States to reduce bureaucratic obstacles, and, as quickly as possible, make it possible to obtain electronically the documents needed for the cross-border provision of services as well as facilitate the cross- border activities of workers in regulated

PE658.913v01-00 24/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN professions;

Or. en

Amendment 47 Sándor Rónai, Maria Grapini, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Christel Schaldemose, Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt

Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

3a. Underlines that while certain aspects remain the competence of Member States, it is the Union’s responsibility to tackle social dumping and practices that could have negative consequences on workers' social security;

Or. en

Amendment 48 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Romana Tomc

Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

3b. Takes into consideration that the harmonisation inspired by the Professional Qualifications Directive gained success within several professions; further proclaims that Member States should reconsider and coordinate rules governing entry and exercise requirements in relation to specific activities or professions;

Or. en

AM\1215391EN.docx 25/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN Amendment 49 Dan-Ştefan Motreanu

Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

3b. Takes into consideration that the harmonisation inspired by the Professional Qualifications Directive gained success within several professions; further proclaims that Member States should reconsider and coordinate rules governing entry and exercise requirements in relation to specific activities or professions;

Or. en

Amendment 50 Sándor Rónai, Maria Grapini, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt

Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

3b. Condemns the practices of some corporations exploiting the fact that certain Member States have lower average salaries, as wages are a key component of working conditions;

Or. en

Amendment 51 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Romana Tomc

Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new)

PE658.913v01-00 26/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN Draft opinion Amendment

3c. Stresses, that, according to the Single Market Scoreboard 2020, further improvements are needed to ensure the free movement of professionals, especially in the field of recognising professional qualifications;

Or. en

Amendment 52 Dan-Ştefan Motreanu

Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

3c. Stresses, that, according to the Single Market Scoreboard 2020, further improvements are needed to ensure the free movement of professionals, especially in the field of recognising professional qualifications;

Or. en

Amendment 53 Evelyne Gebhardt, Sándor Rónai, Andreas Schieder, Petra Kammerevert, Christel Schaldemose

Draft opinion Paragraph 4

Draft opinion Amendment

4. Recalls that the Services Directive 4. Recalls that the Services Directive and the PQD build on the principle of builds on the country of destination mutual recognition to facilitate free principle and aims to ensure the provision movement of services; calls on the of high-quality services and therefore Member States to extend mutual Member States shall not be prevented recognition to more levels of education and from imposing necessary requirements to improve or introduce the necessary with regard to the provision of a service

AM\1215391EN.docx 27/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN procedures as soon as possible; activity and the PQD builds on the principle of mutual recognition to facilitate free movement of professionals; calls on the Member States to extend mutual recognition to more levels of education and to improve or introduce the necessary procedures as soon as possible;

Or. en

Amendment 54 Adam Bielan, Beata Mazurek, Kosma Złotowski, Dominik Tarczyński

Draft opinion Paragraph 4

Draft opinion Amendment

4. Recalls that the Services Directive 4. Recalls that the PQD builds on the and the PQD build on the principle of principle of mutual recognition to facilitate mutual recognition to facilitate free free movement of services and movement of services; calls on the recommends to extend this principle to the Member States to extend mutual Services Directive; believes that the recognition to more levels of education and continuous updating of the Annex V of to improve or introduce the necessary the PDQ, which lists all the qualifications procedures as soon as possible; that comply with the minimum requirements could further benefit professionals in Europe; calls on the Member States to extend mutual recognition to more levels of education and to improve or introduce the necessary procedures as soon as possible;

Or. en

Amendment 55 Christel Schaldemose

Draft opinion Paragraph 4

Draft opinion Amendment

4. Recalls that the Services Directive 4. Recalls that the Services Directive and the PQD build on the principle of and the PQD build on the principle of

PE658.913v01-00 28/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN mutual recognition to facilitate free mutual recognition to facilitate free movement of services; calls on the movement of services; calls on the Member States to extend mutual Member States to examine the possibilities recognition to more levels of education and to extend mutual recognition to more levels to improve or introduce the necessary of education without lowering national procedures as soon as possible; educational requirements and to improve or introduce the necessary procedures as soon as possible;

Or. en

Amendment 56 Kateřina Konečná

Draft opinion Paragraph 4

Draft opinion Amendment

4. Recalls that the Services Directive 4. Recalls that the Services Directive and the PQD build on the principle of and the PQD build on the principle of mutual recognition to facilitate free equal treatment and the prohibition of movement of services; calls on the discrimination on grounds of nationality; Member States to extend mutual whereas the Service directive allows recognition to more levels of education Member states to restrict the freedom of and to improve or introduce the necessary services for reasons of public policy, procedures as soon as possible; public security, public health or the protection of the environment

Or. en

Amendment 57 Maria Grapini

Draft opinion Paragraph 4

Draft opinion Amendment

4. Recalls that the Services Directive 4. Recalls that the Services Directive and the PQD build on the principle of and the PQD build on the principle of mutual recognition to facilitate free mutual recognition to facilitate free movement of services; calls on the movement of services; calls on the Member States to extend mutual Member States to extend mutual recognition to more levels of education and recognition to more levels of education and

AM\1215391EN.docx 29/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN to improve or introduce the necessary to improve or introduce and to procedures as soon as possible; communicate the necessary procedures as soon as possible;

Or. ro

Amendment 58 Jordi Cañas

Draft opinion Paragraph 4

Draft opinion Amendment

4. Recalls that the Services Directive 4. Recalls that the Services Directive and the PQD build on the principle of and the PQD build on the principle of mutual recognition to facilitate free mutual recognition to facilitate free movement of services; calls on the movement of services; calls on the Member States to extend mutual Member States to extend mutual recognition to more levels of education and recognition to more levels of education and to improve or introduce the necessary training, and to improve or introduce the procedures as soon as possible; necessary procedures as soon as possible;

Or. en

Amendment 59 Clara Ponsatí Obiols

Draft opinion Paragraph 4

Draft opinion Amendment

4. Recalls that the Services Directive 4. Recalls that the Services Directive and the PQD build on the principle of and the PQD build on the principle of mutual recognition to facilitate free mutual recognition to facilitate free movement of services; calls on the movement of services; calls on the Member States to extend mutual Member States to extend mutual recognition to more levels of education and recognition to more levels of education and to improve or introduce the necessary to improve or introduce the necessary procedures as soon as possible; procedures as soon as possible; further calls on Member States to coordinate and harmonize the recognition of qualifications completed outside the EU so that these qualifications enjoy

PE658.913v01-00 30/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN comparable recognition everywhere within the single market;

Or. en

Amendment 60 Markus Buchheit, Isabella Tovaglieri, Alessandra Basso, Marco Campomenosi

Draft opinion Paragraph 4

Draft opinion Amendment

4. Recalls that the Services Directive 4. Recalls that the Services Directive and the PQD build on the principle of and the PQD build on the principle of mutual recognition to facilitate free mutual recognition to facilitate free movement of services; calls on the movement of services; calls on the Member States to extend mutual Member States to extend mutual recognition to more levels of education and recognition to more levels of education and to improve or introduce the necessary to improve or introduce the necessary procedures as soon as possible; procedures as soon as possible; recalls that the country of destination principle was not included in the Services Directive;

Or. en

Amendment 61 Sándor Rónai, Maria Grapini, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Christel Schaldemose, Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt

Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

4a. Calls on the Commission to strengthen cooperation with Member States and increase enforcement efforts, not just regarding the legislation on free movement, but also regarding working conditions and the protection of workers’ health and safety, in line with the European Pillar of Social Rights;

Or. en

AM\1215391EN.docx 31/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN Amendment 62 Markus Buchheit, Isabella Tovaglieri, Alessandra Basso, Marco Campomenosi

Draft opinion Paragraph 5

Draft opinion Amendment

5. Encourages the Commission to 5. Calls on the Commission not to fully enforce existing rules; calls for exceed its competences disproportionately alternative resolution mechanisms to be and, in accordance with the principle of assessed and for infringement procedures subsidiarity, to give the Member States to be applied swiftly and rigorously room for development in their policies whenever breaches of relevant legislation and legislation on the free movement of are identified or disproportionate burdens workers and services; calls for alternative introduced; resolution mechanisms to be assessed and for infringement procedures to be applied swiftly and rigorously whenever breaches of relevant legislation are identified or disproportionate non-regulatory burdens introduced;

Or. en

Amendment 63 Adam Bielan, Beata Mazurek, Kosma Złotowski, Dominik Tarczyński

Draft opinion Paragraph 5

Draft opinion Amendment

5. Encourages the Commission to 5. Encourages the Commission to fully enforce existing rules; calls for fully enforce existing rules and to make alternative resolution mechanisms to be quick decisions on complaints to ensure assessed and for infringement procedures that relevant issues from an end-user to be applied swiftly and rigorously perspective are promptly handled and whenever breaches of relevant legislation efficiently settled; calls for alternative are identified or disproportionate burdens resolution mechanisms to be assessed and introduced; for infringement procedures to be applied swiftly and rigorously whenever breaches of relevant legislation are identified or disproportionate burdens introduced;

Or. en

PE658.913v01-00 32/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN Amendment 64 Evelyne Gebhardt, Sándor Rónai, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Marc Angel, Petra Kammerevert, Christel Schaldemose, Maria Grapini

Draft opinion Paragraph 5

Draft opinion Amendment

5. Encourages the Commission to 5. Encourages the Commission to fully enforce existing rules; calls for fully enforce existing rules; calls for alternative resolution mechanisms to be alternative resolution mechanisms to be assessed and for infringement procedures assessed and for infringement procedures to be applied swiftly and rigorously to be applied in accordance with Art. 258 whenever breaches of relevant legislation of the Treaty on the Functioning of the are identified or disproportionate burdens European Union (TFEU) whenever introduced; breaches of relevant legislation are identified or unjustified burdens introduced;

Or. en

Amendment 65 Rasmus Andresen on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Draft opinion Paragraph 5

Draft opinion Amendment

5. Encourages the Commission to 5. Encourages the Commission to fully enforce existing rules; calls for cooperate with Member States to ensure a alternative resolution mechanisms to be full implementation and enforcement of assessed and for infringement procedures existing rules; calls for alternative to be applied swiftly and rigorously resolution mechanisms to be assessed and whenever breaches of relevant legislation for infringement procedures to be applied are identified or disproportionate burdens whenever breaches of relevant legislation introduced; are identified or disproportionate and unjustified burdens introduced;

Or. en

AM\1215391EN.docx 33/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN Amendment 66 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Romana Tomc

Draft opinion Paragraph 5

Draft opinion Amendment

5. Encourages the Commission to 5. Encourages the Commission to fully enforce existing rules; calls for fully and effectively enforce existing rules; alternative resolution mechanisms to be calls for alternative resolution mechanisms assessed and for infringement procedures to be assessed and for infringement to be applied swiftly and rigorously procedures to be applied swiftly and whenever breaches of relevant legislation rigorously whenever breaches of relevant are identified or disproportionate burdens legislation are identified or introduced; disproportionate burdens introduced;

Or. en

Amendment 67 Adam Bielan, Beata Mazurek, Kosma Złotowski, Dominik Tarczyński

Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

5a. Notes that mobility of labour and services complexity increased in the recent years due to number of new European and national rules; calls on the Commission to regularly screen the Internal Market for administrative burdens and to lift them; asks the Commission and the Members States to devote additional resources to improve the functioning of the SOLVIT system as a way for a swift resolution of administrative problems in the Member States;

Or. en

PE658.913v01-00 34/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN Amendment 68 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Romana Tomc

Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

5a. Encourages Member States to work together in order to guarantee the continuity of work of cross-border workers during the pandemic crisis, taking into account their specific situation and in order to preserve the free movement of services and workers in regulated professions within the internal market;

Or. en

Amendment 69 Dan-Ştefan Motreanu

Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

5a. Encourages Member States to work together in order to guarantee the continuity of work of cross-border workers during the pandemic crisis, taking into account their specific situation and in order to preserve the free movement of services and workers in regulated professions within the internal market;

Or. en

Amendment 70 Sándor Rónai, Maria Grapini, Andreas Schieder, Christel Schaldemose, Evelyne Gebhardt

AM\1215391EN.docx 35/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

5a. Welcomes the announcement of the Commission in its´ 2021 Work Programme1a to withdraw the e-card proposals1b; regrets that the proposal on Services Notification Procedure1c could not be adopted due to the lack of an agreement in Council; ______1a COM(2020) 690 final. 1b COM(2016)823 final 2016/0402 (COD) and COM(2016)824 final 2016/0403 (COD). 1c COM(2016)821 final 2016/0398 (COD).

Or. en

Amendment 71 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Romana Tomc

Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

5b. Reiterates that Member States should follow the Council Recommendation on a coordinated approach to the restriction of free movement in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, adopted on 13th October 2020 in order to avoid any disruption in the internal market and free movement of workers and services;

Or. en

PE658.913v01-00 36/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN Amendment 72 Jordi Cañas

Draft opinion Paragraph 6

Draft opinion Amendment

6. Calls on the Commission to 6. Calls on the Commission to improve tools such as the Points of Single improve tools such as the Points of Single Contact and the Single Digital Gateway Contact and the Single Digital Gateway and on the Member States to use such tools and on the Member States to ensure to provide workers, consumers and compliance with the requirements of businesses with accurate and easily making available information and online accessible information regarding their procedures for the effective use of such rights and obligations related to free tools, in order to provide workers, movement within the single market. consumers and businesses with accurate and easily accessible information regarding their rights and obligations related to free movement within the single market, and with particular attention to vulnerable groups such as persons with disabilities;

Or. en

Amendment 73 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Romana Tomc

Draft opinion Paragraph 6

Draft opinion Amendment

6. Calls on the Commission to 6. Calls on the Commission to improve tools such as the Points of Single improve tools such as the Points of Single Contact and the Single Digital Gateway Contact and the Single Digital Gateway and on the Member States to use such tools where appropriate, to provide guidelines to provide workers, consumers and to help Member States streamline businesses with accurate and easily procedures, in particular for SMEs; calls accessible information regarding their and on the Member States to use such tools rights and obligations related to free to provide workers, consumers and movement within the single market. businesses with prompt, accurate and easily accessible information regarding their rights and obligations related to free movement within the single market.

AM\1215391EN.docx 37/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 74 Sándor Rónai, Maria Grapini, Andreas Schieder, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Christel Schaldemose, Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt

Draft opinion Paragraph 6

Draft opinion Amendment

6. Calls on the Commission to 6. Calls on the Commission to improve tools such as the Points of Single strengthen the Points of Single Contact Contact and the Single Digital Gateway and the Single Digital Gateway as foreseen and on the Member States to use such tools in the Services Directive and on the to provide workers, consumers and Member States to use those tools to businesses with accurate and easily provide workers, consumers and businesses accessible information regarding their with accurate and easily accessible rights and obligations related to free information regarding their rights and movement within the single market. obligations related to free movement within the single market.

Or. en

Amendment 75 Edina Tóth

Draft opinion Paragraph 6

Draft opinion Amendment

6. Calls on the Commission to 6. Calls on the Commission to improve tools such as the Points of Single improve tools such as the Points of Single Contact and the Single Digital Gateway Contact and the Single Digital Gateway and on the Member States to use such tools and on the Member States to use such tools to provide workers, consumers and to provide workers, consumers and businesses with accurate and easily businesses with accurate and easily accessible information regarding their accessible information regarding their rights and obligations related to free rights and obligations related to free movement within the single market. movement within the single market; also sees a need to further develop the Internal Market Information System (IMI) by, for example, expanding the available functions in order to facilitate the work of

PE658.913v01-00 38/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN national authorities; therefore asks the Commission to establish appropriate support structures in the areas of training and technical assistance so that all the advantages of the system in terms of effectiveness can be realised;

Or. hu

Amendment 76 Adam Bielan, Beata Mazurek, Kosma Złotowski, Dominik Tarczyński

Draft opinion Paragraph 6

Draft opinion Amendment

6. Calls on the Commission to 6. Calls on the Commission to improve tools such as the Points of Single improve tools such as the Points of Single Contact and the Single Digital Gateway Contact and the Single Digital Gateway and on the Member States to use such tools and on the Member States to use such tools to provide workers, consumers and to provide workers, consumers and businesses with accurate and easily businesses with accurate and easily accessible information regarding their accessible information regarding their rights and obligations related to free rights and obligations related to free movement within the single market. movement within the single market; recalls the need to accelerate the modernisation of the public administration so that it can process communication with citizens and businesses in a digital way;

Or. en

Amendment 77 Kateřina Konečná

Draft opinion Paragraph 6 – point 1 (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

(1) Urges the Commission to take action against the so-called letterbox companies, which are artificially set up to circumvent applicable legislation in a host

AM\1215391EN.docx 39/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN country, while clearly abusing the freedom of establishment;

Or. en

Amendment 78 Krzysztof Hetman, Arba Kokalari, Tomislav Sokol, Ivan Štefanec, Andreas Schwab, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Romana Tomc

Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

6a. Recalls that cross-border health care services fall within the ambit of freedom to provide services as stated by the Court of Justice of the EU; notes that Cross-border Health Care Directive was adopted also on basis of Article 114 TFEU; regrets that Cross-border Health Care Directive creates additional obstacles to provision of cross-border health care services when compared to the case-law of the Court of Justice applying the Treaty provisions on free movement of services; underlines the necessity that these additional obstacles are removed, underlines that a better coordination and promotion of best practices between Member States and cross-border mobility of health professionals are beneficial and particularly important during the COVID- 19 pandemic;

Or. en

Amendment 79 Dan-Ştefan Motreanu

Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new)

PE658.913v01-00 40/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN Draft opinion Amendment

6a. Recalls that cross-border health care services fall within the ambit of freedom to provide services as stated by the Court of Justice of the EU; notes that Cross-border Health Care Directive was adopted also on basis of Article 114 TFEU; regrets that Cross-border Health Care Directive creates additional obstacles to provision of cross-border health care services when compared to the case-law of the Court of Justice applying the Treaty provisions on free movement of services; underlines the necessity that these additional obstacles are removed, underlines that a better coordination and promotion of best practices between Member States and cross-border mobility of health professionals are beneficial and particularly important during the COVID- 19 pandemic;

Or. en

Amendment 80 Adam Bielan, Beata Mazurek, Kosma Złotowski, Dominik Tarczyński

Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

6a. Emphasises that due to the growing volume of labour and services’ mobility, digitalisation is a must; is of the opinion that the digital tools designed to facilitate mobility of labour and services as well as an exchange of the information between the different social security systems, such as digital A1Portable Document form, will improve workers’ protection, reduce administrative burdens and improve Member States cooperation;

Or. en

AM\1215391EN.docx 41/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN Amendment 81 Andreas Schwab, Krzysztof Hetman

Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

6a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that all relevant procedures to access the services market in another Member State are efficiently coordinated and that service providers are properly informed, in order to ensure compliance with applicable national rules, including proportionate employment terms and conditions that Member States apply in accordance with Union law;

Or. en

Amendment 82 Jordi Cañas

Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

6a. Calls therefore for greater promotion, application and enforcement of the European Qualifications Framework to guarantee a widely used recognition instrument throughout the European Union;

Or. en

Amendment 83 Maria Grapini

Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new)

PE658.913v01-00 42/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN Draft opinion Amendment

6a. Considers that, in order to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market and the timely provision of services, it is necessary to remove barriers to the free movement of workers within the EU;

Or. ro

Amendment 84 Christel Schaldemose

Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

6a. Urges the Commission to introduce a European social security number in order to promote fair working conditions, and thus realizing the principle of equal pay for equal work at the same place;

Or. en

Amendment 85 Adam Bielan, Beata Mazurek, Kosma Złotowski, Dominik Tarczyński

Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

6b. Supports the Commission's Communication on "Long term action plan for better implementation and enforcement of Single Market rules" especially the proposals to: reinforce SOLVIT as a tool for Single Market dispute resolution, increase the Commission activity and support to the

AM\1215391EN.docx 43/44 PE658.913v01-00 EN Member States as they transpose the EU law to ensure correct and harmonised interpretation across the Internal Market, create a Single Market obstacles tool under the Single Digital Gateway, allowing citizens and businesses to report anonymously on regulatory obstacles encountered by them while exercising their internal market rights; highlights further that the Commission should act decisively to mitigate discovered obstacles, as in the past identifying issues itself frequently led to little few achievements;

Or. en

Amendment 86 Adam Bielan, Beata Mazurek, Kosma Złotowski, Dominik Tarczyński

Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

6c. Calls on the Member States, to implement the updated Commission Guidelines concerning the exercise of the free movement of workers during COVID- 19 outbreak in order to allow workers, in particular transport, frontier, posted and seasonal workers, and service providers to cross borders and have access to their place of work, unless imposed restrictions are dully justified; calls on the Commission to actively collect and present in a comprehensive way all relevant information including sanitary obligations and restrictions present in various Member States;

Or. en

PE658.913v01-00 44/44 AM\1215391EN.docx EN