Cypriot Greek As a Heritage and Community Language in London: (Socio)Linguistic Aspects of a Non-Standard Variety in a Diasporic Context1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cypriot Greek As a Heritage and Community Language in London: (Socio)Linguistic Aspects of a Non-Standard Variety in a Diasporic Context1 CYPRIOT GREEK AS A HERITAGE AND COMMUNITY LANGUAGE IN LONDON: (SOCIO)LINGUISTIC ASPECTS OF A NON-STANDARD VARIETY IN A DIASPORIC CONTEXT1 Petros Karatsareas University of Westminster Abstract Cypriot Greek has been spoken in the United Kingdom as a heritage and community language for over a century by a sizeable Greek Cypriot diaspora. In this chapter, I describe Cypriot Greek as it is spoken in London, presenting some of its key linguistic characteristics and discussing aspects of its sociolinguistic status in the wider UK context. In terms of linguistic characteristics, I present older, regional features that are currently being levelled in Cyprus but which survive in London’s Cypriot Greek; Standard Modern Greek features that are increasingly used in London even in informal instances of communication; and, phenomena that are attributed to language contact with English. In terms of sociolinguistic status, I focus on the intergenerational transmission of Cypriot Greek in London and identify three key factors that threaten its maintenance in the diaspora: its minority status with respect to English, its non- prestigious status with respect to Standard Modern Greek, and also its non-prestigious status with respect to Cypriot Greek as it is currently spoken in Cyprus. 1. London’s Greek Cypriot diaspora: a tile in the city’s multicultural and multilingual mosaic The United Kingdom has historically been the principal destination of Cypriot emigrants (Constantinou, 1990). Christodoulou places the onset of migration from Cyprus to the UK in 1902 (1959; cited in Constantinou, 1990: 151– 152). Migration remained low until the mid-1950s and only began to increase in 1955–1959, when violence on the island intensified during the anti-colonial struggles. Migratory flows reached an unprecedented peak in 1960–1963, immediately after the independence of Cyprus in 1960. Constantinou (1990) has described this period as a mass exodus driven by a general feeling of uncertainty caused by the establishment of the Cyprus as an independent state, a high rate of unemployment and the passing of the Commonwealth Immigrants Act of 1962, which would limit the Commonwealth citizens’ rights to work in the UK. Migration peaked again in 1975, one year after the 1974 crisis, and reached its lowest levels in 1983. There is not a single area of Cyprus that was not affected by emigration. The 1946 census (Percival, 1949: 7), however, identified six areas defined around specific villages in five of the island’s six districts as having contributed to the earliest migratory flows in larger numbers (Map 1): 1. Nicosia District: the area around Klirou and Palaichori. 2. Kyrenia District: the area around Kormakitis and Diorios. 3. Famagusta District: the area between Yialousa and Akanthou. 4. Famagusta District: the area around Marathovounos and Pyrga. 5. Larnaca District: the area around Lefkara. 6. Paphos District: the area around Drouseia, Stroumpi and Lysos. 1 This study was conducted with the financial support of the British Academy through a Postdoctoral Fellowship, the University of the West of England, Bristol, and the University of Westminster. I am grateful to Achilleas Hadjikyriacou, Maria Panteli-Papalouca, Stavroulla Prodromou, Maro Strouthou, and Christodoulos Stylianou for helping me to recruit participants and generally facilitating my access to London’s community; and to my research assistant, Alexandra Georgiou, for all her help and support. Last but not least, I am indebted to all the members of London’s Greek Cypriot diaspora who participated in the study. Map 1: areas in Cyprus with large numbers of emigrants to the UK. Based on Constantinou (1990: 158) with data from Percival (1949: 7). Prior to the independence of Cyprus, emigration consisted predominantly of men, who came to the UK in search of work and would return to the island to find spouses, whom they would later bring with them. After independence, emigration was more family-based whereby whole families emigrated altogether or one member migrated first to be joined by the remaining members at a later time. Throughout the period of migration, migrants tended to be of young age and have a basic level of education, if they indeed happened to have received any schooling in Cyprus at all. They were also low to medium skilled, for the most part farmers, manual workers, production workers, tailors, metal workers and carpenters. In the UK, their first employment included the catering business. Later, tailoring and dressmaking became popular occupations for many members of the diaspora (Constantinides, 1990; Constantinou, 1990). Today, the Greek Cypriot παροικία [pariˈcia] ‘expatriate community’ is one of the over 200 ethnolinguistic minorities that compose the UK’s diverse population (Baker & Eversley, 2000; Eversley et al., 2010). The exact size of the community is, perhaps unsurprisingly, difficult to determine. Official sources such as the 2011 census document only the number of UK residents who were born in Cyprus (82,295 individuals; Office for National Statistics) and thus fail to account for the number of UK residents with a Greek Cypriot background who were born in the country. Other sources place the figure somewhere between 150,000 and 300,000 people (Anthias, 1990; Constantinides, 1990; Constantinou, 1990; Christodoulou-Pipis, 1992l Gardner-Chloros, 1992; Papapavlou & Pavlou, 2001; National Federation of Cypriots in the UK). As noted by Constantinides (1990: 133), the community might initially seem rather small, especially when compared with other ethnolinguistic communities present in the country. However, if one considers the entire population of the Republic of Cyprus (838,897 individuals; 2011 census), the large size of the UK diaspora becomes clear, equalling between one fifth and one third of the metropolitan Greek Cypriot population. The greatest number of the UK’s Greek Cypriots are found in London with smaller communities in other major cities such as Manchester, Birmingham, Bristol and Liverpool. Data from the 2008 Annual School Census on the distribution of different languages spoken by London’s schoolchidren show that the boroughs of Barnet, Camden, Enfield, Haringey, and Islington in the north of the capital’s metropolitan area have the highest concentration of Greek speakers, confirming earlier accounts and language surveys (Linguistic Minorities Project, 1985; Constantinides, 1990; Baker & Eversley, 2000); see Map 2. Josephides (1990) describes London’s diaspora as an active network of strong social ties supported and reinforced not only by kinship and friendship relations but also by proximity of residence, employment relations as well as a number of social and communal structures of Greek Cypriot interest. These include community centres; associations, societies and clubs; political organisations; action groups; women’s groups; complementary schools; the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of Thyateira and Great Britain, and its parishes; and, printed and non-printed media such as the Parikiaki and Eleftheria newspapers, London Greek Radio and Hellenic TV. Map 2: areas of London with large numbers of people with a Greek Cypriot background. Early Greek Cypriot migrants were largely monolingual and monodialectal in Cypriot Greek (henceforth CyGr), with only rudimentary knowledge of Standard Modern Greek (henceforth SModGr) and English (Gardner-Chloros, 1992: 115). Today, the linguistic repertoire of London’s Greek Cypriot diaspora includes three languages: English, the majority language of the UK, and CyGr and SModGr as the two heritage languages of the community. For first- generation speakers (born in Cyprus and migrated to the UK as late adolescents or adults), English is a second language, which they learned after the end of childhood. Second-generation speakers (born in the UK to Cyprus-born parents), and third-generation speakers (born in the UK to UK-born parents and Cyprus-born grandparents) are both dominant in English, having acquired it either from birth at home at the same time as CyGr (simultaneous bilinguals) or when they started attending mainstream British schools, having first acquired CyGr (sequential bilinguals). Knowledge of SModGr is gained through formal education, participation in the public life of the community, and exposure to media from Cyprus and Greece. Depending on the type and amount of schooling they received in Cyprus before migrating, first-generation speakers will have been exposed to SModGr either from the onset of their schooling or, if they did not attend school in Cyprus, from their late adolescent and adult years. For second- and third-generation speakers, exposure to the standard language normally starts when they begin attending one of the approximately 50 Greek complementary schools that operate in the UK, teaching Greek language, history, geography and folk tradition (mainly song and dance) to children with a Greek Cypriot background. No generation is dominant in SModGr. In this chapter, I describe the heritage variety of CyGr that is spoken in London’s diaspora, presenting some of its key linguistic characteristics and discussing aspects of its sociolinguistic status in the wider UK context, drawing on data collected through ethnographic observations and interviews with members of London’s Greek Cypriot diaspora from September 2014 onwards. I first provide a brief theoretical outline of the (socio)linguistics of heritage and community languages in section 2. I then turn to the linguistic characteristics in section 3 and move
Recommended publications
  • Study of the Geomorphology of Cyprus
    STUDY OF THE GEOMORPHOLOGY OF CYPRUS FINAL REPORT Unger and Kotshy (1865) – Geological Map of Cyprus PART 1/3 Main Report Metakron Consortium January 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1/3 1 Introduction 1.1 Present Investigation 1-1 1.2 Previous Investigations 1-1 1.3 Project Approach and Scope of Work 1-15 1.4 Methodology 1-16 2 Physiographic Setting 2.1 Regions and Provinces 2-1 2.2 Ammochostos Region (Am) 2-3 2.3 Karpasia Region (Ka) 2-3 2.4 Keryneia Region (Ky) 2-4 2.5 Mesaoria Region (Me) 2-4 2.6 Troodos Region (Tr) 2-5 2.7 Pafos Region (Pa) 2-5 2.8 Lemesos Region (Le) 2-6 2.9 Larnaca Region (La) 2-6 3 Geological Framework 3.1 Introduction 3-1 3.2 Terranes 3-2 3.3 Stratigraphy 3-2 4 Environmental Setting 4.1 Paleoclimate 4-1 4.2 Hydrology 4-11 4.3 Discharge 4-30 5 Geomorphic Processes and Landforms 5.1 Introduction 5-1 6 Quaternary Geological Map Units 6.1 Introduction 6-1 6.2 Anthropogenic Units 6-4 6.3 Marine Units 6-6 6.4 Eolian Units 6-10 6.5 Fluvial Units 6-11 6.6 Gravitational Units 6-14 6.7 Mixed Units 6-15 6.8 Paludal Units 6-16 6.9 Residual Units 6-18 7. Geochronology 7.1 Outcomes and Results 7-1 7.2 Sidereal Methods 7-3 7.3 Isotopic Methods 7-3 7.4 Radiogenic Methods – Luminescence Geochronology 7-17 7.5 Chemical and Biological Methods 7-88 7.6 Geomorphic Methods 7-88 7.7 Correlational Methods 7-95 8 Quaternary History 8-1 9 Geoarchaeology 9.1 Introduction 9-1 9.2 Survey of Major Archaeological Sites 9-6 9.3 Landscapes of Major Archaeological Sites 9-10 10 Geomorphosites: Recognition and Legal Framework for their Protection 10.1
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Role of Intellectuals in the 1931 Uprising
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1999 Intellectuals and Nationalism in Cyprus: A Study of the Role of Intellectuals in the 1931 Uprising Georgios P. Loizides Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Loizides, Georgios P., "Intellectuals and Nationalism in Cyprus: A Study of the Role of Intellectuals in the 1931 Uprising" (1999). Master's Theses. 3885. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3885 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTELLECTUALS AND NATIONALISM IN CYPRUS: A STUDY OF THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUALS IN THE 1931 UPRISING by Georgios P. Loizides A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Sociology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1999 Copyright by Georgios P. Loizides 1999 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to begin by thanking the members of my Thesis Committee, Dr. Paula Brush (chair), Dr. Douglas Davidson, and Dr. Vyacheslav Karpov for their invaluable help, guidance and insight, before and during the whole thesis-pregnancy period. Secondly, I would like to thank my friends and colleagues at the Department of Sociology for their feedback and support, without which this pro­ ject would surely be less informed. Georgios P.
    [Show full text]
  • Photographic Exhibition Organized by the Cyprus Municipalities Under Turkish Military Occupation
    PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITION ORGANIZED BY THE CYPRUS MUNICIPALITIES UNDER TURKISH MILITARY OCCUPATION THE DESTRUCTION OF THE EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION OF CYPRUS BY TURKEY THE TRAGEDY GOES ON… “If we should hold our peace, the stones will cry out” (Luke 19: 40) THE DESTRUCTION OF THE EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION OF CYPRUS BY TURKEY THE TRAGEDY GOES ON… “If we should hold our peace, the stones will cry out” (Luke 19: 40) The photographic exhibition is organized by the nine occupied municipalities of Cyprus: Ammochostos, Kyrenia, Morphou, Lysi, Lapithos, Kythrea, Karavas, Lefkoniko, and Akanthou. The exhibition aims at sensitizing the broader public to the tragic consequences of the Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974. An effort is made to trace, as much as possible, the pain caused by the war and the uprooting of tenths of thousands of people from their homes. At the core of the presentation lies the systematic destruction of cultural heritage in the island’s occupied areas, which persists to this day as a result of ethnic cleansing and religious fanaticism. As proof of the above, damages to archaeological sites, ecclesiastical monuments and all non-Muslim cemeteries, as well as thefts intended to offer antiquities for sale at a profit, are showcased here. In some cases, photographic evidence which has been brought to light for the first time is put forth. This exhibition is divided into thematic units which are separated from one another by their different colours. Each panel includes a title and a brief text, whilst being supplemented by pertinent ‘before and after 1974’ visual material. The first unit introduces the nine occupied municipalities, with a historical outline, their most significant monuments and their present state.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Section
    FOURTH SECTION CASE OF STRATI v. TURKEY (Application no. 16082/90) JUDGMENT (merits) STRASBOURG 22 September 2009 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Strati v. Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Nicolas Bratza, President, Giovanni Bonello, Lech Garlicki, Ljiljana Mijović, David Thór Björgvinsson, Ledi Bianku, Işıl Karakaş, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 1 September 2009, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 16082/90) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Cypriot national, Mr Costas Strati (“the applicant”), on 12 January 1990. 2. The applicant was represented by Mr L. Clerides and Mr C. Clerides, two lawyers practising in Nicosia. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Z.M. Necatigil. 3. The applicant alleged, in particular, that the Turkish occupation of the northern part of Cyprus had deprived him of his properties and that he had been subjected to treatment contrary to the Convention during a demonstration. 4. The application was transmitted to the Court on 1 November 1998, when Protocol No. 11 to the Convention came into force (Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11). 5. By a decision of 26 September 2002 the Court declared the application partly admissible.
    [Show full text]
  • CHYPRE Îles Kleides
    33° 33°30 34° 34°30 CHYPRE Îles Kleides Cap 32°30 Apostolos A N É E a s Andreas R r p E R a T Rizokarpaso D I K É Panagia M e Eleousa Aigialousa d 383 Galinoporni 35°30 Agios Andronikos 35°30 e Vothylakas l Leonarisso Eptakomi u R s Kantara n Koma tou Gialou E Cap Kormakitis Komi i Galateia 724 n M Akanthou Kyrenia Agios é Lampousa Patriki Agios Theodoros Lapithos (Keryneia) Amvrosios P Kalograia Kormakitis Vasileia 1024 Karavas Karmi Cap Elaia Paleokastro Myrtou Kyparissovounon Kazafani Charkeia St-Hilarion 954 Belapais Pentadaktylos Trikomo Diorios 740 Asomatos Buffavento Knodara Lefkonoiko B a i e d e Kontemenos Kato Kiados Lapathos B a i e d e Kalo Chorio Dikomo Kythrea Gypsou Marathovounos M o r f o u Syrianochori Skylloúra Kioneli Exo Metochi F a m a g o u s t e Ovg M É S Limnia Kyra os Agios Vasileios Trachonas O R Morfou Gerolakkos Angastina É E Agios Sergios Kato Pyrgos Serrac Kokkina Prastio his NICOSIE Egkomi Salamine Kato Avlona (LEFKOSIA) Mora Gia Pomos Vouni Mammari (fermé) Askeia lias Prastio Zodeia P s Karavostasi Astromeritis Enkomi Afanteia Sinta ed o Pentageia iai Famagouste 34°30 669 g Aglangia Vatili os Cap r Galini Akaki y Strovolos Baie Soloi Tymvou (Ammochostos) Arnaoutis P Petra Peristerona Lakatameia Kontea Palaiometocho Lysi Kalopsida Chrysochou Gialia Lefka Orounta Meniko Geri Bains Arsos Makrasyka Acheritou Capitale d'État P d'Aphrodite Pano Deftera Agios Memnon d é Tseri Tremetousia (plus de 200 000 hab.) ' n os A in Argaka 1212 r Asinou Agia Marina Ergates Psimolofou Potamia Achna Deryneia ka su Marion e l X Avgorou ma e Korakou Athienou Plus de 100 000 hab.
    [Show full text]
  • The Loss of a Civilization: Destruction of Cultural Heritage in Occupied
    THE LOSS OF A CIVILIZATION Destruction of cultural heritage in occupied Cyprus Original Research / Text: Lefkios Zaphiriou, Costas Nicolaides, Miltos Miltiadou, Marianna Mammidou, Van Coufoudakis Editor: Miltos Miltiadou Editorial Assistance (2012 Edition): Chloe Philippou, Aliki Stylianou, David Porter Photos: Photographic Archive of the Press and Information Offi ce Photographic Archive of the Archaeological Museum of Cyprus Design: Nicos Ierodiaconou The sale or other commercial exploitation of this publication or part of it is strictly prohibited. Excerpts from the publication may be reproduced with appropriate acknowledgment of this publication as the source of the material used. Press and Information Offi ce publications are available free of charge. THE LOSS OF A CIVILIZATION Destruction of cultural heritage in occupied Cyprus Nicosia 2012 Map showing the 1974 UN ceasefire line across the Republic of Cyprus and the areas of the Republic under military occupation by Turkey. 2 | The loss of a civilization “Damage to cultural property belonging to any people whatsoever means damage to the cultural heritage of all mankind.” Preamble to the Hague Convention of 1954 on the Preservation of the Cultural Heritage in the Event of Armed Confl ict. “The political-demographic de facto partition imposed on Cyprus since 1974 thus threatens not only the unity and integrity of a modern nation-state but also the millennial cultural integrity and continuity of the island which has been the crossroads of the civilization of the Eastern Mediterranean.” Michael Jansen, “Cyprus: The Loss of a Cultural Heritage” Modern Greek Studies Yearbook, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1986 The loss of a civilization | 3 The Church of Apostolos Varnavas, in the Famagusta district 4 | The loss of a civilization The loss of a civilization Cyprus is the largest island in the Eastern Mediterranean.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred and Mortuary Landscapes in Iron Age Cyprus: a GIS Analysis James P
    The College of Wooster Libraries Open Works Senior Independent Study Theses 2015 Sacred and Mortuary Landscapes in Iron Age Cyprus: A GIS Analysis James P. Torpy The College of Wooster, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://openworks.wooster.edu/independentstudy Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Geographic Information Sciences Commons, and the Human Geography Commons Recommended Citation Torpy, James P., "Sacred and Mortuary Landscapes in Iron Age Cyprus: A GIS Analysis" (2015). Senior Independent Study Theses. Paper 6783. https://openworks.wooster.edu/independentstudy/6783 This Senior Independent Study Thesis Exemplar is brought to you by Open Works, a service of The oC llege of Wooster Libraries. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Independent Study Theses by an authorized administrator of Open Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Copyright 2015 James P. Torpy Sacred and Mortuary Landscapes in Iron Age Cyprus: A GIS Analysis by James Torpy A Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirements of Independent Study in Archaeology at The College of Wooster Archaeology 451-452 P. Nick Kardulias 22 March 2015 i ABSTRACT During the Archaic period (750-480 BC) the island of Cyprus underwent a dramatic transformation as new city-kingdoms rose to dominate the political landscape of the island. This shift resulted in increased competition for resources, establishment of political boundaries, and emergence of a pronounced social hierarchy within the new polities. While many of the large settlements that became centers of power during this time have been thoroughly studied, the manifestation of the large scale changes of the Archaic in the periphery have not been as fully investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Window on Cyprus
    WINDOW ON CYPRUS “Cyprus is not a detail, a mere island at the edge of the Mediterranean Sea; today it has been transformed into the fateful centre, where the moral values of contemporary man are at stake. ... For us this is a good moment to forget our passions and our petty cares; for each man of us with his own God- given gifts to follow the path of freedom throughout the land of Cyprus. And we must share her grief, her upsurge, her danger, insofar as we are capable, and surely later on her great joy as well.” Nikos Kazantzakis (From his essay “The Angels of Cyprus”). Gold-green leaf Land of the lemon and the olive tree land of warm embraces, land of joy land of the pine and the cypress tree land of fine young men, land of love a gold-green leaf cast upon the open sea Land of the parched prairie land of the bitter Virgin land of the warm wind and unfair loss land of wild weather and volcanoes a gold-green leaf cast upon the open sea Land of the laughing girls land of the tipsy boys land of unction and salutations Cyprus, land of love and dreams a gold-green leaf cast upon the open sea Leonidas Malenis (Translated by John Vickers) window on cyprus P.I.O. 219/2015 - 4.000 Photography: The majority of the photographs used ISBN 978-9963-50-351-3 in the book come from the photographic archive of the Press and Information Offi ce. In addition, a number of institutions and individuals have generously given their Published by the Press and Information Offi ce, permission for the use of photographs in the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 72 Cyprus Compiled by D
    Map 72 Cyprus Compiled by D. Rupp, 1994 Introduction Many factors, both ancient and not so ancient, have contributed to the cultural map that can be constructed of Cyprus between 1100 B.C. and A.D. 640. Before the beginning of the third century B.C. the island remained on the periphery of the Greek world. Only then did hellenization begin to permeate its entire society, not just the elite in the urban centers of some of the Iron Age kingdoms. Political and economic ties with the Levant, as well as cultural influences, had contributed significantly to shaping the Cypriote landscape in the Iron Age. Until hellenization irrevocably transformed Cypriote society and its use of the landscape in the Hellenistic period, the historical geography of the island must be understood in its own indigenous terms. Aside from the principal urban centers of the Iron Age kingdoms, Greek and Roman sources do not provide a wealth of detailed information on the geography of Cyprus. Extant epigraphical sources are likewise relatively mute on this topic. It is thus archaeology that must be employed as the primary source for historical geography. In the later nineteenth century, the plundering of chamber tombs and of rural sanctuaries under the guise of research was the norm in Cypriote archaeology. Although subsequently this regrettable approach was abandoned and the scientific excavation of kingdom centers commenced, fascination with the material culture revealed by tombs and by sanctuaries continued unabated. As a result, while there now exists a wealth of evidence for their location, overall distribution patterns and periods of occupation, by contrast the location, size and nature of settlements is much less well understood.
    [Show full text]
  • CHRISTIAN MONUMENTS of CYPRUS Under Turkish Military Occupation Map Sections
    CHRISTIAN MONUMENTS OF CYPRUS Under Turkish Military Occupation “ And when they had gone through the isle unto Paphos, they found a certain sorcerer, a false prophet, a Jew, whose name was Bar-jesus: which was with the deputy of the country, Sergius Paulus, a prudent man; who called for Barnabas and Saul, and desired to hear the word of God. But Elymas the sorcerer (for so is his name by interpretation) withstood them, seeking to turn away the deputy from the faith. Then Saul (who is also called Paul), filled with the Holy Ghost, set his eyes on him, And said, O full of all subtlety and all mischief, thou child of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord? And now, behold, the hand of the Lord is upon thee, and thou shalt be blind, not seeing the sun for a season. And immediately there fell on him a mist and a darkness; and he went about seeking some to lead him by the hand. Then the deputy, when he saw what was done, believed, being astonished at the doctrine of the Lord. “ Acts 13:6-12 The Conversion of the Proconsul – Raphael, 1515-16 CONTENTS Monastery of Profitis Elias, Ayia Marina Skilloura. Church of Chrysopolitissa, Kyrenia Town. Map Sections 06 About the Project 07 Section A’ 08 Section B’ 10 Section C’ 12 Section D’ 14 Section E’ 16 Section F’ 18 Section G’ 20 The entrance of the church Agios Andronikos, in Kythrea. Monastery of Agios Panteleimon in Myrtou.
    [Show full text]
  • A Visitor´S Map of Cyprus
    20° 10° 0° 10° 20° 30°40° 50° Kleides Islands LOCATION DIAGRAM Cape Apostolos Andreas 55°55° 50°50° N Kordylia Islet A E C O ApostolosApostolosApostolos ApostolosApostolosApostolos AndreasAndreasAndreas C 50°50° AndreasAndreasAndreas I A Visitor΄s Map of Cyprus %%PanagiaPanagiaPanagia Afentrika AfentrikaAfentrika 45°45° EE PanagiaPanagiaPanagia Afentrika AfentrikaAfentrika T N P A E L U R O R %% T AgiosAgiosAgios A 45°45° FilonFilonFilon 40°40° FilonFilonFilon 40°40° S c a l e 1 : 3 5 0 . 0 0 0 Rizokarpaso PanagiaPanagiaPanagia 35°35° EleousaEleousaEleousa A EleousaEleousaEleousa M E D I T A SS I A E R I A R Kilometres 10 0102030 Kilometres %% I A A 35°35° 5 S F N AgiosAgiosAgios Thyrsos ThyrsosThyrsos A F R I E (Rock-Cut)(Rock-Cut)(Rock-Cut) A 30°30° A I CK A P A N R S E A KYPROS A K (CYPRUS) 30°30° Aigialousa 500 10001000 Kms Kms Kms 00 500 000 000000 Galinoporni 222000 Agios Melanarga Andronikos 5° 0° 5°10° 15° 20° 25° 30° 35° Koroveia Kila Islet Koilanemos PanagiaPanagiaPanagia KanakariaKanakariaKanakaria KanakariaKanakariaKanakaria Agios Symeon %% Platanissos %% Vothylakas Lythragkomi Vasili Neta Leonarisso Eptakomi Koma Davlos Galateia tou Gialou KantaraKantaraKantara Komi Cape Kormakitis Livadia Tavrou Forest Flamoudi Station K Krideia Agios a s Efstathios Vokolida 666000000 tro Livera AKANTHOU 666000 s 000000 Ovgoros 444000 444 000000 Agios Theodoros LampousaLampousaLampousa 222000 Patriki AcheiropoiitosAcheiropoiitosAcheiropoiitos LampousaLampousaLampousa Gerani AcheiropoiitosAcheiropoiitosAcheiropoiitos%% Glykiotissa Islet
    [Show full text]
  • European Court of Human Rights
    FOURTH SECTION CASE OF STRATI v. TURKEY (Application no. 16082/90) JUDGMENT (merits) STRASBOURG 22 September 2009 FINAL 01/03/2010 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. STRATI v. TURKEY JUDGMENT (MERITS) 1 In the case of Strati v. Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Nicolas Bratza, President, Giovanni Bonello, Lech Garlicki, Ljiljana Mijović, David Thór Björgvinsson, Ledi Bianku, Işıl Karakaş, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 1 September 2009, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 16082/90) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Cypriot national, Mr Costas Strati (“the applicant”), on 12 January 1990. 2. The applicant was represented by Mr L. Clerides and Mr C. Clerides, two lawyers practising in Nicosia. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Z.M. Necatigil. 3. The applicant alleged, in particular, that the Turkish occupation of the northern part of Cyprus had deprived him of his properties and that he had been subjected to treatment contrary to the Convention during a demonstration. 4. The application was transmitted to the Court on 1 November 1998, when Protocol No. 11 to the Convention came into force (Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No.
    [Show full text]