Freight Operators

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Freight Operators Vanita Patel Analysis & Performance Manager - BTP ANALYSIS • Freight operators record a low level of offences on BTP compared with Network Rail and passenger Train Operating Companies (TOCs) • Last eight years: • TOCs have recorded 75.8% of BTP recorded notifiable crime • Network Rail 24.0% • Freight Operators 0.2% Freight TOC NWR 2005/2006 90 46649 13763 2006/2007 84 47511 13136 2007/2008 114 40880 12949 2008/2009 93 39576 12398 2009/2010 51 36120 11484 20010/2011 94 34452 12364 2011/2012 84 31524 11181 2012/2013 83 31064 9852 2013/2014 50 30471 9254 2014/2015 41 22416 6844 2 Freight Operators affected by crime: Colas DB Schenker Direct Rail Services Freightliner GB Railfreight Devon & Cornwall Europorte (operates in France and owns GB Rail freight) Stobart Rail (sublets trains) Mendip Rail Not Protectively Marked 3 TYPES OF CRIME AFFECTING FREIGHT OPERATORS • Theft Rail Property – items stolen from containers, keys • Cable Theft • Trespass – in freight yard or in front freight train • Graffiti The above crimes accounted for 68% of total freight crime in 2014/2015 Not Protectively Marked 4 DISRUPTION "Crime Related" NWR Disruption Lost Minutes Affecting Freight Trains 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 0 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 Total number of delay minutes assigned to freight trains has fallen from 222,458 minutes in 2011-12 to only 135,362 in 2013-14 (a 39% decrease) Not Protectively Marked 5 DISRUPTION “Crime Related" NWR Disruption Lost Minutes Affecting Freight Operators - By Category 140000 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 Cable vandalism/theft Fatalities/injuries caused by being hit by train Trespass Total number of delay minutes attributed to cable are projected to see a 68% reduction against last year. Lost minutes attributed to Trespass and Fatalities are projected to see a 12% and 13% increase respectively Not Protectively Marked 6 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT • Monthly data extracts for Freight Operators • Local meetings – Freight Stakeholder Tasking Meeting, Policing Plan consultations, Bi Monthly engagement meeting • Ad hoc engagement for specific events • National bi monthly meeting to discuss freight operator requirements • Enhanced engagement and joint working with NWR Freight SPOCs and Border Force • Freight related proposed target 2015/2016 Not Protectively Marked 7 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Somerset Local Aggregate Assessment
Somerset Local Aggregate Assessment: incorporating data from 2005-2014 Somerset County Council with Exmoor National Park Authority Minerals and Waste Development Framework This document has been prepared by Somerset County Council in partnership with Exmoor National Park Authority © Somerset County Council Cover photographs: Main image and bottom left image: Whatley Quarry (taken by SCC); middle left image: view of an aggregate working area (taken by SCC); top left image: Halecombe Quarry (taken by SCC). Copies of this document are available from: Somerset County Council County Hall Taunton Somerset TA1 4DY Tel: 0300 123 2224 Email: [email protected] For further details of the Somerset Minerals and Waste Development Framework, and to view and download this and related documents, please visit the Somerset County Council website: www.somerset.gov.uk/mineralsandwaste For further details of the Exmoor National Park Local Plan, please visit http://www.exmoor-nationalpark.gov.uk/planning/planning-policy Document control record Name of document: Somerset Local Aggregate Assessment Draft approved: 19 January 2016 Revised draft approved: 26 January 2016 2nd revision: 09 March 2016 ii Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Land won Aggregates 7 3. Imports and Exports 13 4. Capacity of Aggregate Transportation Infrastructure 16 5. Alternative Aggregates 19 6. Future Aggregate Supply 23 7. Conclusions 28 List of Tables Table 1 Permitted Aggregate Quarries 6 Table 2 Crushed Rock Sales in Somerset 2005-2014 7 Table 3 Somerset Existing Landbank
[Show full text]
Competition Act 1998
Competition Act 1998 Decision of the Office of Rail Regulation* English Welsh and Scottish Railway Limited Relating to a finding by the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) of an infringement of the prohibition imposed by section 18 of the Competition Act 1998 (the Act) and Article 82 of the EC Treaty in respect of conduct by English Welsh and Scottish Railway Limited. Introduction 1. This decision relates to conduct by English Welsh and Scottish Railway Limited (EWS) in the carriage of coal by rail in Great Britain. 2. The case results from two complaints. 3. On 1 February 2001 Enron Coal Services Limited (ECSL)1 submitted a complaint to the Director of Fair Trading2. Jointly with ECSL, Freightliner Limited (Freightliner) also, within the same complaint, alleged an infringement of the Chapter II prohibition in respect of a locomotive supply agreement between EWS and General Motors Corporation of the United States (General Motors). Together these are referred to as the Complaint. The Complaint alleges: “[…] that English, Welsh and Scottish Railways Limited (‘EWS’), the dominant supplier of rail freight services in England, Wales and Scotland, has systematically and persistently acted to foreclose, deter or limit Enron Coal Services Limited’s (‘ECSL’) participation in the market for the supply of coal to UK industrial users, particularly in the power sector, to the serious detriment of competition in that market. The complaint concerns abusive conduct on the part of EWS as follows. • Discriminatory pricing as between purchasers of coal rail freight services so as to disadvantage ECSL. *Certain information has been excluded from this document in order to comply with the provisions of section 56 of the Competition Act 1998 (confidentiality and disclosure of information) and the general restrictions on disclosure contained at Part 9 of the Enterprise Act 2002.
[Show full text]
Annex A: Organisations Consulted
Annex A: Organisations consulted This section lists the organisations who have been directly invited to respond to this consultation: Administrative Justice and Tribunals Service Advanced Transport Systems AEA Technology Plc Aggregate Industries Alcan Primary Metal Europe Alcan Smelting & Power UK Alstom Transport Ltd Amey Plc Angel Trains Arriva Trains Wales ASLEF Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland Association of Community Rail Partnerships Association of London Government Association of Railway Industry Occupational Physicians Association of Train Operating Companies Atkins Rail Avon Valley Rail Axiom Rail BAA Rail Babcock Rail Bala Lake Railways Balfour Beatty plc Bluebell Railway PLC Bombardier Transportation BP Oil UK Ltd Brett Aggregates Ltd British Chambers of Commerce British Gypsum British International Freight Association British Nuclear Fuels Ltd British Nuclear Group Sellafield Ltd British Ports Association British Transport Police BUPA Buxton Lime Industries Ltd c2c Rail Ltd Cabinet Office Campaign for Better Transport Carillion Rail Cawoods of Northern Ireland Cemex UK Cement Ltd Channel Tunnel Safety Authority Chartered Institute of Logistics & Transport Chiltern Railways Company Ltd City of Edinburgh Council Civil Aviation Authority Colas Rail Ltd Commission for Integrated Transport Confederation of British Industry Confederation of Passenger Transport UK Consumer Focus Convention of Scottish Local Authorities Correl Rail Ltd Corus Construction & Industrial CrossCountry Crossrail Croydon Tramlink Dartmoor
[Show full text]
Access to Rail Freight Sites Market Study
Annette Egginton Head of Competition & Consumer Policy Telephone 020 7282 2101 Fax 020 7282 2043 E-mail [email protected] 30 September 2011 Freight Industry Colleagues - by email Dear colleagues, Access to rail freight sites market study As you may know, between September 2010 and February 2011 we carried out a public market study into access to rail freight sites in Great Britain (GB). This resulted in a stakeholder consultation on our findings, which ran from May to July 2011. The full consultation responses are published on our website1, with confidential material redacted as requested by respondents. The note attached is designed to provide an overview and to stimulate the discussions necessary in the development of remedies which will form the next stage of this review. We would like to thank the sixteen organisations which responded. A full list of respondents is available at Annex B. As our initial findings document2 suggested, many of the issues identified in the market will require solutions, particularly those around the transfer of leases and access to freight sites. We are proposing that these solutions be industry-led. We would encourage all rail freight stakeholders to play their full part in designing a framework that enables both the suppliers and buyers of railway services to plan their business with a reasonable degree of assurance that there are no unnecessary barriers to competition, and to work together to develop and agree measures necessary to resolve the issues identified. In particular, we are asking the rail freight industry to develop and agree a Code of Practice to improve transparency around capacity and charges for freight sites as well as interpretation of alienation and termination clauses in leases, using a consultative and collaborative approach.
[Show full text]
In Partnership for Britain's Prosperity the West of England
In Partnership For Britain’s Prosperity The West of England The partnership railway’s plan to secure growth across the West of England Together we are changing, investing and improving for Britain The partnership railway Acknowledgements to: Rail Delivery Group, ACoRP, NSAR, Rail Freight Group, Rail Supply Group, RIA, RSSB, Transport Focus 2 3 A plan to change, improve and secure prosperity Customers will benefit from new and more modern trains, simpler ticketing, more 1 services, faster journeys and better value for money, while we transform our for the West of England communities’ social and economic futures by enabling people to benefit from the opportunities provided by rail. The railway plays a key part in moving the goods Britain’s railway, a partnership of the public and private sectors, is fundamental that power our economy faster and more efficiently, connecting businesses in the to the nation’s prosperity, connecting workers to jobs, businesses to markets, and West of England to markets all over the world. And by supporting our existing people to their families and friends. That’s why in October 2017 we launched In talent, moving forward as one team and encouraging new recruits with workforce Partnership for Britain’s Prosperity, the national plan to secure a stronger economy, training, we are securing a bright future for our employees working both in the rail improve customer journeys, boost local communities and create more rewarding industry and its supply chain. jobs on the railway. And why now we are coming together as one to set out how the plan is delivering for the West of England.
[Show full text]
Freightliner Heavy Haul Limited Representations to ORR Regarding
Freightliner Group Limited Steve Jones 3rd Floor Access Executive 90 Whitfield Street, Fitzrovia Office of Rail and Road London W1T 4EZ 25 Cabot Street London E14 4QZ 26th February 2021 Dear Steve, Re: Proposed 10th supplemental agreement to the track access contract between Network Rail Infrastructure Limited and Freightliner Heavy Haul Limited dated 11 December 2016. Thank you for your letter dated 12th February 2021 inviting Freightliner Heavy Haul Ltd (FLHH) to comment on the representations made by Network Rail as part of the above proposed supplemental agreement. FLHH raised three principle issues over which terms could not be agreed with the facility owner in our Form F submitted with this application; 1) Performance, 2) Route Availability and 3) Network Rail access policy over the Great Eastern Mainline. Network Rail have provided further information to each of these areas of focus, and we welcome the opportunity to respond to these representations. Performance Stable train plan Network Rail makes a number of representations around performance and touch on some of the good work that has been done to drive improvements since FLHH took over the traffic, but what is missing is the intrinsic link between securing access rights and performance. In particular, that building a high- performing train plan needs a solid foundation, as highlighted in section 5.1 of the Form F submission: The granting of Access Rights with one-hour windows for all Mendip services is key part of improving performance, providing a stable train plan from which Freightliner can identify specific issues and work on rectification. Without access rights that match the train plan, there is continuing significant instability in the plan between timetables, diverting focus away from improving schedules and on to rectifying issues with timetable offers, resulting in a sub optimal outcome for all timetable participants.
[Show full text]
The Railways and Guided Transport (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2010: Consultation Document
The Railways and Guided Transport (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2010: Consultation document March 2010 The Railways and Guided Transport (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2010: Consultation document Contents 1. Introduction....................................................................................................1 Background .....................................................................................................1 The consultation ..............................................................................................3 Responses ......................................................................................................3 Next steps .......................................................................................................4 2. Background to Directive 2008/110/EC (the revised Railway Safety Directive) and Directive 2009/149/EC (the CSI Directive) ...........................5 European Common Transport Policy...............................................................5 Purpose of the revised Railway Safety Directive .............................................6 Desired outcome of implementing the revised Railway Safety Directive .........6 Scope of the revised Railway Safety Directive ................................................7 Exclusions from scope.....................................................................................7 Derogations .....................................................................................................8 Background to the CSI
[Show full text]
RFG News Sep 2019
137 September 2019 NEWS www.rfg.org.uk Helping ensure a sustainable future for UK rail freight PD Ports named RFG’s Business of the Year RFG Awards Dinner celebrates the success P.3 and innovation across the rail freight sector. GBRf launches third Southampton intermodal service P.10 RFG and RFM joint event brings businesses together PD Ports has won the Business of the A joint entry by Tarmac and RFS Works Ltd Year Award at the Rail Freight Group’s won the Innovation and Technical Devel- annual excellence awards dinner, with opment Award for a redesign of an urban the judges praising its outstanding depot including an innovative ‘Supergrab’ commitment to its customers and to the that significantly increased capacity and wider local community in the North East. efficiency, while Peel Ports in Liverpool triumphed in the Community & Environ- Network Rail won the Project of the Year mental Responsibility category with the P.16 category for its enhancement work on the rejuvenation of rail services and a huge Mendip Rail supports Felixstowe to Nuneaton route, increasing investment in training and in generating ‘Joining the Dots’ capacity from 33 to up to 47 freight trains new jobs in the local community. a day. Continued on page 2 & Gallery (with judge’s comments) on pages 5-9. RFG report looks at according to our new report. The study, undertaken by Stephen Joseph future growth and Associates highlights how a new approach economic potential from national and local Governments, along with continued investment from the indus- of rail freight sector try, could unlock growth significantly in ex- P.21 cess of current projections.
[Show full text]
ADD.GOD.755.20 Telecoms Credentials
INTERNATIONAL RAIL A Global Team of Industry Experts THE UK WAS THE FIRST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD TO SET UP PASSENGER RAIL FRANCHISE CONTRACTS IN 1996. LEADING ADDLESHAW GODDARD’S LAWYERS HAVE BEEN AT THE FOREFRONT OF THIS PROGRAMME FOR MANY YEARS. THE WAY NOW THE FRANCHISING MODEL IS SHIFTING AGAIN. RAIL SERVICES ARE ADAPTING TO CHANGES IN DEMAND, TECHNOLOGY AND FINANCING. ADDLESHAW GODDARD IS WORKING ALONGSIDE THE REGULATORS, TRAIN OPERATING COMPANIES AND FINANCIAL INVESTORS TO SUPPORT AND ADVISE THROUGH THIS TIME OF TRANSFORMATION. We are an extensive full service Our clients include government rail team working across multiple departments such as DfT, infrastructure jurisdictions across the globe advising managers such as HS1 Limited and public and private sector clients across Network Rail, manufacturers such all aspects including: as CAF and Hitachi Rail, financiers including Eversholt Rail and SMBC z Rail passenger concessions whom we advise on a full range of legal services from procurement, to funding z Infrastructure projects and finance, all aspects of contract and corporate law and dispute resolution. z Rolling stock manufacture and finance This is a snapshot of our expertise. z Rail regulation z Freight haulage CONTENTS PASSENGER THE FUTURE OF INFRASTRUCTURE CONNECTING CONCESSIONS FRANCHISING COUNTRIES ROLLING STOCK PIONEERS IN BUILDING A RAIL REGULATION MANUFACTURE COMPLEX FINANCE SUSTAINABLE AND FINANCE LEASING FUTURE IN RAIL IMPLEMENTING FREIGHT ENVIRONMENTALLY ABOUT AG A NEW REGULATORY HAULAGE FRIENDLY WAGONS REGIME PASSENGER
[Show full text]
Air Quality Report 2009
Mendip District Council - England MENDIP '--......,. .._ ... -.......- D ISTR ICT ,CQU N C I L 2009 Air Quality Updating and Screening Assessment for Mendip District Council In fulfillment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management April 2009 Updating and Screening Assessment April 2009 Mendip District Council - England Local Rupert Williamson Authority Environmental Protection Officer Officer Department Neighbourhood Services Address Cannards Grave Road Shepton Mallet Somerset BA4 5AA Telephone 01749 341466 e-mail [email protected] Report Reference number Date ii Updating and Screening Assessment April 2009 Mendip District Council - England Executive Summary Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 places responsibility on local authorities to review and assess the air quality in their area in comparison to National Air Quality Objectives. The review and assessment of air quality takes the form of an Updating and Screening Assessment (USA) every three years, which is intended to identify significant changes that may have occurred since the previous rounds of Review and Assessment. This includes new monitoring data; new or changed emission sources and any local changes that may affect air quality. Progress Reports are produced in the interim years between USAs to keep stakeholders informed of changes and allow the local authority to take early steps to protect air quality if there are doubts about achieving any objective. If either the USA or Progress Report raises doubts as to whether an air quality objective will be achieved, then a Detailed Assessment is conducted to evaluate the risk that the objective will not be achieved. If the Detailed Assessment concludes that a risk exists, then consideration must be given to declaring an Air Quality Management Area and an Air Quality Action Plan should be introduced.
[Show full text]
Freight & National Passenger Operators Route Strategic Plan
Freight & National Passenger Operators Route Strategic Plan February 2018 FNPO Route Strategic Plan Contents 1. Foreword ............................................................................................. 3 2. Summary ............................................................................................. 4 3. FNPO Overview .................................................................................. 8 4. Route Objectives ............................................................................... 10 5. Freight ............................................................................................... 21 6. Cross Country Trains Ltd .................................................................. 60 7. Caledonian Sleeper ........................................................................... 76 8. Charters ............................................................................................. 80 9. Aspirant Open Access Operators...................................................... 83 10. Activities & expenditure ................................................................. 84 11. Cost competiveness & delivery strategy ....................................... 87 12. CP6 regulatory framework ............................................................ 92 13. People strategy ........................................................................... 100 Sign-off .................................................................................................... 104 Appendix A - Key assumptions ..............................................................
[Show full text]
Development of Rail Freight in Europe: What Regulation Can and Cannot Do
Development of rail freight in Europe: What regulation can and cannot do United Kingdom Case Study Professor Allan Woodburn (University of Westminster) Brussels, 11 December 2014 141211_CERRE_RailFreight_UK_Case_Study_Final 1/43 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 2. The demand side.................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Key bulk freight markets ................................................................................................ 3 2.2 Other freight markets .................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 5 3. The supply side ...................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Trends in rail freight activity .......................................................................................... 8 3.2 Structure of the rail freight market .............................................................................. 14 3.3 Key characteristics of the rail freight operators .......................................................... 18 4. Rail freight regulation .........................................................................................................
[Show full text]