In Partnership for Britain's Prosperity the West of England
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Minutes Document for Devon and Exeter Rail Project Working Party, 15/07/2016 14:00
1 CABINET DEVON AND EXETER RAIL PROJECT WORKING PARTY- 15/07/16 DEVON AND EXETER RAIL PROJECT WORKING PARTY 15 July 2016 Present:- Devon County Council: Councillors Ball, Biederman, Bowden, Eastman, Julian, Mathews, Sellis, Way, Westlake and Younger-Ross Exeter City Council Councillors Sutton, Wardle and Leadbetter East Devon District Council Councillors Bailey and Longhurst Mid Devon District Council Councillor Snow Teignbridge District Councill Councillors Goodey and Prowse Torbay Councill Councillors Doggett and Manning Members attending in accordance with Standing Order 25: Councillor Greenslade Apologies: Councillors Hughes, Squires, Flynn, Deed and Luggar 9 Minutes RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting held on 19 February 2016 be signed as a correct record. 10 Update from Great Western Railway (Councillor Greenslade attended in accordance with Standing Order 25(2) and spoke to this item). Mr L Ward, Regional Development Planning and Programme Manager, gave a presentation which covered: passenger growth performance fleet update speed to the West stations investment depot investment community rail Matters discussed by Members with Mr Ward included: the Tarka line - Barnstaple growth; the need for early train to Exeter St David’s; and increased passenger capacity to be resolved by expansion; 2 CABINET DEVON AND EXETER RAIL PROJECT WORKING PARTY- 15/07/16 the use of Class 143s on the Exeter – Okehampton Sunday Rover service when available; new developments leading to population growth at Exminster and Bideford; lack of -
Community Rail 2017 2 3
1 Great Western Railway Community Rail 2017 2 3 Contents Foreword Foreword 3 It’s been another great year for our TransWilts Community Rail Partnership 4 Community Rail Partnerships, which The Heart of Wessex Rail Partnership 6 make a vital contribution to the local economy, promoting tourism as well Severnside Community Rail Partnership 8 as being a lifeline for residents, helping Three Rivers Rail Partnership 10 to overcome the very real problems North Downs Line Community Rail Partnership 12 associated with rural isolation. Devon and Cornwall Rail Partnership 14 GWR Community Rail Conference 2017 17 Apart from the obvious travel benefits The innovation and investment you all borne out by increasing passenger put into running your partnerships is very Customer and Communities Improvement Fund (CCIF) 18 numbers, the partnerships also strengthen humbling and sets an example for us all. ACoRP Community Rail Awards 2017 20 local communities as many different I’m delighted to see the Community Involving Diverse Groups 21 organisations, and individuals of all ages, come together to promote their Rail Partnerships growing in stature and Involving Children and Young People 22 partnerships and keep stations along the recognition, so thank you all once again lines in ‘tip top’ condition. for your hard work. I wish all of you the Best Marketing or Communications Campaign 24 best for the coming year. Most Enhanced Station Buildings and Surroundings 26 In recent years we’ve seen significant passenger growth on our community Innovation in Community Rail 29 rail lines and I’m sure the work we have Small Projects Award – Under £500 30 focused on together has helped us to achieve this. -
GENERAL INFORMATION This Timetable Shows The
GENERAL INFORMATION NOTES AND SYMBOLS This timetable shows the full service between Exeter and Exmouth — The Bold Denotes a through service x Service stops on Avocet Line — and the full service between Exeter St Davids and Exeter Central. Light Denotes a connecting service request. Passengers Pink Operates on certain days only wishing to alight must TH E E LIN Printed information correct at time of going to press (March 2013). Rail GW Service operated by First Great Western inform the conductor. AVOCET Improvement work may affect the services shown in this timetable and train T Interchange with the London Underground Passengers wishing to services are also often amended on Bank Holidays. To check travel details and t Minimum connection time where board must give an appropriate hand for the most up-to-date timetable information visit different from the standard 5 minutes signal to the driver www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/printtimetable or use our smart phone app. a Arrival time y 6 minutes later until 19 October c Applies from 8 July until 30 August aa 5 minutes later until 7 September National Rail Conditions of Carriage d Departure time ab Runs from 26 May until 15 September For further information on tickets and travelling on the national rail network e 16 minutes earlier from 2 September ac Fridays Only please refer to the National Rail Conditions of Carriage, a copy of which is f 9 minutes earlier on Fridays A Runs from 26 May until 15 September available on our website at www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk or at staffed stations. -
Somerset Local Aggregate Assessment
Somerset Local Aggregate Assessment: incorporating data from 2005-2014 Somerset County Council with Exmoor National Park Authority Minerals and Waste Development Framework This document has been prepared by Somerset County Council in partnership with Exmoor National Park Authority © Somerset County Council Cover photographs: Main image and bottom left image: Whatley Quarry (taken by SCC); middle left image: view of an aggregate working area (taken by SCC); top left image: Halecombe Quarry (taken by SCC). Copies of this document are available from: Somerset County Council County Hall Taunton Somerset TA1 4DY Tel: 0300 123 2224 Email: [email protected] For further details of the Somerset Minerals and Waste Development Framework, and to view and download this and related documents, please visit the Somerset County Council website: www.somerset.gov.uk/mineralsandwaste For further details of the Exmoor National Park Local Plan, please visit http://www.exmoor-nationalpark.gov.uk/planning/planning-policy Document control record Name of document: Somerset Local Aggregate Assessment Draft approved: 19 January 2016 Revised draft approved: 26 January 2016 2nd revision: 09 March 2016 ii Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Land won Aggregates 7 3. Imports and Exports 13 4. Capacity of Aggregate Transportation Infrastructure 16 5. Alternative Aggregates 19 6. Future Aggregate Supply 23 7. Conclusions 28 List of Tables Table 1 Permitted Aggregate Quarries 6 Table 2 Crushed Rock Sales in Somerset 2005-2014 7 Table 3 Somerset Existing Landbank -
Representing Users of the Barnstaple to Exeter Rail Line
RepresentingEXETER users – BARNSTAPLE of the Barnstaple RAILWAY to Exeter LINE rail line TARKA RAIL ASSOCIATION ASPIRATIONS FOR THE GREATER WESTERN FRANCHISE 2013 INTRODUCTION 1 The purpose of this paper is to set out as succinctly as possible the aspirations of the Tarka Rail Association for the new Greater Western Franchise which is scheduled to come into force in 2013. 2 The new Department for Transport “Guide to the railway franchise procurement process” specifically excludes pre-qualifying bidders from discussing matters with stakeholders while preparing bids. Thus user groups are excluded from a widely accepted and appreciated process as has been the case hitherto. In particular we are not able to influence the service specification. 3 Consequently, we have prepared this document with a view to sending it to all major train operating groups and to the Department for Transport (DfT), Office of the Rail Regulator and Network Rail prior to the formal process getting under way. The document has been prepared in consultation with the Avocet Line Rail Users Group and the Torbay Line Users Group, the Devon & Cornwall Rail Partnership (DCRP) and also, most importantly, Devon County Council (DCC) as the transport authority for our area and with whom we have a strong working relationship. BACKGROUND 4 The Tarka Rail Association was formerly known as the North Devon Rail Users Group. We have over 200 members. We have a Committee of volunteers representing users along the whole 39 route miles of the Exeter – Barnstaple railway line. We are the longest established users group in the south-west of England and are widely respected in the industry, not least because of our very positive and pro-active stance. -
Competition Act 1998
Competition Act 1998 Decision of the Office of Rail Regulation* English Welsh and Scottish Railway Limited Relating to a finding by the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) of an infringement of the prohibition imposed by section 18 of the Competition Act 1998 (the Act) and Article 82 of the EC Treaty in respect of conduct by English Welsh and Scottish Railway Limited. Introduction 1. This decision relates to conduct by English Welsh and Scottish Railway Limited (EWS) in the carriage of coal by rail in Great Britain. 2. The case results from two complaints. 3. On 1 February 2001 Enron Coal Services Limited (ECSL)1 submitted a complaint to the Director of Fair Trading2. Jointly with ECSL, Freightliner Limited (Freightliner) also, within the same complaint, alleged an infringement of the Chapter II prohibition in respect of a locomotive supply agreement between EWS and General Motors Corporation of the United States (General Motors). Together these are referred to as the Complaint. The Complaint alleges: “[…] that English, Welsh and Scottish Railways Limited (‘EWS’), the dominant supplier of rail freight services in England, Wales and Scotland, has systematically and persistently acted to foreclose, deter or limit Enron Coal Services Limited’s (‘ECSL’) participation in the market for the supply of coal to UK industrial users, particularly in the power sector, to the serious detriment of competition in that market. The complaint concerns abusive conduct on the part of EWS as follows. • Discriminatory pricing as between purchasers of coal rail freight services so as to disadvantage ECSL. *Certain information has been excluded from this document in order to comply with the provisions of section 56 of the Competition Act 1998 (confidentiality and disclosure of information) and the general restrictions on disclosure contained at Part 9 of the Enterprise Act 2002. -
Annex A: Organisations Consulted
Annex A: Organisations consulted This section lists the organisations who have been directly invited to respond to this consultation: Administrative Justice and Tribunals Service Advanced Transport Systems AEA Technology Plc Aggregate Industries Alcan Primary Metal Europe Alcan Smelting & Power UK Alstom Transport Ltd Amey Plc Angel Trains Arriva Trains Wales ASLEF Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland Association of Community Rail Partnerships Association of London Government Association of Railway Industry Occupational Physicians Association of Train Operating Companies Atkins Rail Avon Valley Rail Axiom Rail BAA Rail Babcock Rail Bala Lake Railways Balfour Beatty plc Bluebell Railway PLC Bombardier Transportation BP Oil UK Ltd Brett Aggregates Ltd British Chambers of Commerce British Gypsum British International Freight Association British Nuclear Fuels Ltd British Nuclear Group Sellafield Ltd British Ports Association British Transport Police BUPA Buxton Lime Industries Ltd c2c Rail Ltd Cabinet Office Campaign for Better Transport Carillion Rail Cawoods of Northern Ireland Cemex UK Cement Ltd Channel Tunnel Safety Authority Chartered Institute of Logistics & Transport Chiltern Railways Company Ltd City of Edinburgh Council Civil Aviation Authority Colas Rail Ltd Commission for Integrated Transport Confederation of British Industry Confederation of Passenger Transport UK Consumer Focus Convention of Scottish Local Authorities Correl Rail Ltd Corus Construction & Industrial CrossCountry Crossrail Croydon Tramlink Dartmoor -
Freight Operators
Freight Operators Vanita Patel Analysis & Performance Manager - BTP ANALYSIS • Freight operators record a low level of offences on BTP compared with Network Rail and passenger Train Operating Companies (TOCs) • Last eight years: • TOCs have recorded 75.8% of BTP recorded notifiable crime • Network Rail 24.0% • Freight Operators 0.2% Freight TOC NWR 2005/2006 90 46649 13763 2006/2007 84 47511 13136 2007/2008 114 40880 12949 2008/2009 93 39576 12398 2009/2010 51 36120 11484 20010/2011 94 34452 12364 2011/2012 84 31524 11181 2012/2013 83 31064 9852 2013/2014 50 30471 9254 2014/2015 41 22416 6844 2 Freight Operators affected by crime: Colas DB Schenker Direct Rail Services Freightliner GB Railfreight Devon & Cornwall Europorte (operates in France and owns GB Rail freight) Stobart Rail (sublets trains) Mendip Rail Not Protectively Marked 3 TYPES OF CRIME AFFECTING FREIGHT OPERATORS • Theft Rail Property – items stolen from containers, keys • Cable Theft • Trespass – in freight yard or in front freight train • Graffiti The above crimes accounted for 68% of total freight crime in 2014/2015 Not Protectively Marked 4 DISRUPTION "Crime Related" NWR Disruption Lost Minutes Affecting Freight Trains 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 0 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 Total number of delay minutes assigned to freight trains has fallen from 222,458 minutes in 2011-12 to only 135,362 in 2013-14 (a 39% decrease) Not Protectively Marked 5 DISRUPTION “Crime Related" NWR Disruption Lost Minutes Affecting Freight Operators - By Category 140000 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 Cable vandalism/theft Fatalities/injuries caused by being hit by train Trespass Total number of delay minutes attributed to cable are projected to see a 68% reduction against last year. -
Access to Rail Freight Sites Market Study
Annette Egginton Head of Competition & Consumer Policy Telephone 020 7282 2101 Fax 020 7282 2043 E-mail [email protected] 30 September 2011 Freight Industry Colleagues - by email Dear colleagues, Access to rail freight sites market study As you may know, between September 2010 and February 2011 we carried out a public market study into access to rail freight sites in Great Britain (GB). This resulted in a stakeholder consultation on our findings, which ran from May to July 2011. The full consultation responses are published on our website1, with confidential material redacted as requested by respondents. The note attached is designed to provide an overview and to stimulate the discussions necessary in the development of remedies which will form the next stage of this review. We would like to thank the sixteen organisations which responded. A full list of respondents is available at Annex B. As our initial findings document2 suggested, many of the issues identified in the market will require solutions, particularly those around the transfer of leases and access to freight sites. We are proposing that these solutions be industry-led. We would encourage all rail freight stakeholders to play their full part in designing a framework that enables both the suppliers and buyers of railway services to plan their business with a reasonable degree of assurance that there are no unnecessary barriers to competition, and to work together to develop and agree measures necessary to resolve the issues identified. In particular, we are asking the rail freight industry to develop and agree a Code of Practice to improve transparency around capacity and charges for freight sites as well as interpretation of alienation and termination clauses in leases, using a consultative and collaborative approach. -
The Rail User Express We Continue with the Usual Roundup of News
June 2020 Welcome to the Rail User Express RUX may be forwarded, or items reproduced (quoting sources). Anyone may request it as an email attachment, or opt to be notified when it is posted on the Railfuture (Rf) website. There is no charge for either service. Following GDPR, Railfuture Membership now maintains both lists. Please advise if you no longer wish to receive RUX or the link, or if you know of anyone who would like to be added. For more on any item, consult the relevant website, or ask the editor for the source material. As the rail industry recovers from Covid-19, passenger numbers may well be depleted. We must hope that this is not used as an excuse to delay or even shelve much-needed rail infrastructure projects. On the contrary, it is the ideal time to fast track them, and so make rail a greener alternative to both the car and the HGV. Access to stations should encourage bus use, cycling and walking, whilst providing for those with restricted mobility. Roger Smith We continue with the usual roundup of news items from groups around the UK. Please keep your contributions coming: they are all gratefully received. Friends of the Far North Line Exciting news! After many years of work behind the scenes, especially by Frank Roach of HITRANS (Highlands and Islands Transport Partnership), plans are in hand for a proper transport hub in Inverness. Although the present bus station is quite near the railway station, there are several sites in between. With the financial help of Transport Scotland, NR has purchased the former Royal Mail sorting office and car park, the TK Maxx and Sports Direct buildings, a public car park and Highland Rail House on the north side of Station Square. -
Ranger & Rover Tickets.Xlsx
Day Ranger tickets in the South West Ticket title Area covered Valid Monday to Friday from Valid on trains of Adult Child Card Family Group Rail Cards accepted Atlantic Coast Newquay branch between Par and Newquay in Cornwall. FGW £4.50 £2.25 £2.95 YP S D HM DC Line Ranger Throughout Devon from St.Budeaux Ferry Road west of 09:00. Also valid on 05:50 and 06:48 Exeter St D. Plymouth to Tiverton Parkway and Axminster in the east Devon Day Ranger to Barnstaple, 08:43 Barnstaple to Exmouth, 06:41 FGW, SWT, XC £10.00 £5.00 £6.60 YP S D HM DC and the four Devon branch lines to Gunnislake, Paignton, and 08:26 Exeter St D. to Axminster. Exmouth and Barnstaple. Devon Day Ranger 18:00. Also valid on the 17.29 Gunnislake- As daytime ticket above. FGW, SWT, XC £5.00 £2.50 £3.30 YP S D HM DC (Evening) Plymouth. Within the Bristol, Swindon and Weymouth triangle and 08:20. Also valid on 07:54 Severn Beach to Bristol, Heart of Wessex includes Pilning, Yate, Parson Street and Pewsey and the 08:02 Parson Street to Bristol, 08:09 Yate to FGW, SWT £19.00 £9.50 £12.55 YP S D HM Day Ranger Severn Beach branch. Weymouth, and 08:07 Pewsey to Westbury Looe Valley Line Looe branch between Liskeard and Looe in Cornwall. 08:15 FGW £4.00 £2.00 £2.65 YP S D HM FF Ranger Maritime Line Falmouth branch between truro and Falmouth in Cornwall. -
Freightliner Heavy Haul Limited Representations to ORR Regarding
Freightliner Group Limited Steve Jones 3rd Floor Access Executive 90 Whitfield Street, Fitzrovia Office of Rail and Road London W1T 4EZ 25 Cabot Street London E14 4QZ 26th February 2021 Dear Steve, Re: Proposed 10th supplemental agreement to the track access contract between Network Rail Infrastructure Limited and Freightliner Heavy Haul Limited dated 11 December 2016. Thank you for your letter dated 12th February 2021 inviting Freightliner Heavy Haul Ltd (FLHH) to comment on the representations made by Network Rail as part of the above proposed supplemental agreement. FLHH raised three principle issues over which terms could not be agreed with the facility owner in our Form F submitted with this application; 1) Performance, 2) Route Availability and 3) Network Rail access policy over the Great Eastern Mainline. Network Rail have provided further information to each of these areas of focus, and we welcome the opportunity to respond to these representations. Performance Stable train plan Network Rail makes a number of representations around performance and touch on some of the good work that has been done to drive improvements since FLHH took over the traffic, but what is missing is the intrinsic link between securing access rights and performance. In particular, that building a high- performing train plan needs a solid foundation, as highlighted in section 5.1 of the Form F submission: The granting of Access Rights with one-hour windows for all Mendip services is key part of improving performance, providing a stable train plan from which Freightliner can identify specific issues and work on rectification. Without access rights that match the train plan, there is continuing significant instability in the plan between timetables, diverting focus away from improving schedules and on to rectifying issues with timetable offers, resulting in a sub optimal outcome for all timetable participants.