DOCSLIB.ORG

Augustus Program and Abstracts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Program Monday 29 September 2014 8.30-9.20: Registration (CCANESA, Madsen Building, University of Sydney) Sessions are held in the Oriental Studies Room unless otherwise specified. 9.20-9.50: Welcome: Professor Barbara Caine, Head of the School (SOPHI) Session 1 Chair: Associate Professor Bruce Marshall (Macquarie University) 9.50-10.40: Professor Gregory Rowe (University of Victoria, BC): A Commemoration of Commemorations: the Res Gestae in the context of Augustan epigraphy 10.40-11.20: Dr Richard Westall (Catholic University of America, Rome Campus): Copies of the Res Gestae Divi Augusti and the eastern tour of Germanicus 11.20-11.50 Morning tea (CCANESA, Madsen Building) Session 2 Chair: Dr Ben Brown (University of Sydney) 11.50-12.30: Ms Paulina Komar (University of Wrocław, Poland and University of Liverpool, UK): Consumption boom in Italy in the Augustan age – causes and consequences 12.30-1.10: Mr James Donaldson (University of Queensland): Herod and Augustus: the politics of marriage 1 1.10-2.30: Lunch (CCANESA, Madsen Building) Session 3 Chair: Dr Lea Beness (Macquarie University) 2.30-3.10: Dr Hannah Mitchell (University of Warwick): Monumentalising aristocratic achievement in triumviral Rome: Octavian’s competition with his peers 3.10-3.50: Dr Frederik Vervaet (University of Melbourne): Subsidia dominationi: the early careers of Tiberius and Drusus revisited 3.50-4.30: Mr Martin Stone (University of Sydney): Marcus Agrippa: Republican statesman or dynastic fodder? 4.30-5.00: Afternoon tea (CCANESA, Madsen Building) Session 4 Chair: Associate Professor Kathryn Welch (University of Sydney) 5.00-6.00: Professor Nicholas Purcell (Brasenose College, Oxford): Augustus between public and private Venue: General Lecture Theatre 1 (Main Quad) 6.30-8.30: Reception (Women’s College, University of Sydney): In the Hall of Maecenas 2 Tuesday 30 September 2014 Session 5 Chair: Professor Jeff Tatum (Victoria University, Wellington) 9.00-9.40: Emeritus Professor Edwin Judge (Macquarie University): Alternatives to Caesar 9.40-10.20: Mr Bradley Jordan (University of Melbourne): C. Octavius Mag. Eq. Des.: The magisterium equitum and Caesar’s intentions for Octavius 10.20-11.00: Dr Bronwyn Hopwood (University of New England): What’s in a name? Appian and the nomenclature of Oktaouios Kaisar 11.00-11.30: Morning Tea (CCANESA, Madsen Building) Session 6 Chair: Dr Kit Morrell (University of Sydney) 11.30-12.10: Mr Gustavo García Vivas (University of La Laguna, Tenerife): ‘That sickly and sinister youth’: the first considerations of Syme on Octavian as a historical figure 12.10-12.50: Dr Andrew Pettinger (University of Sydney): The lectio senatus of 18 BC: a failure of Augustus’ auctoritas? 12.50-2.00: Lunch (CCANESA, Madsen Building) Session 7 Chair: A/Prof. Lindsay Watson (University of Sydney) 2.00-2.40: Mr Matthew Loar (Stanford University): Hercules, Mummius, Augustus: the Roman Triumph in Aeneid 8 2.40-3.20: Dr Anne Rogerson (University of Sydney): Virgil’s Trojan Games 3.20-3.45: Afternoon tea Session 8 Chair: Professor Eric Csapo (University of Sydney) 3.45-4.20: Mr Roger Pitcher (University of Sydney): Concordia in Ovid 3 4.20-5.00: Dr Geraldine Herbert-Brown (University of Sydney): Sulmo mihi patria est (T.4.10.3): Searching for Ovid’s Sulmo 5.00-6.00: Todd Memorial Lecture Reception (Foyer, Eastern Avenue Building) 6.00-7.30: Todd Memorial Lecture Professor Karl Galinsky (University of Texas, Austin): Memory and Forgetting in the Age of Augustus Venue: Eastern Avenue Auditorium Wednesday 1 October Session 9 Chair: Dr Sebastiana Nervegna (University of Sydney) 9.00-9.40: Ms Aura Piccioni (Regensburg University): Ultio for Pax: the paradox of the Saeculum Aureum 9.40-10.20: Dr Jelle Stoop (University of California, Berkeley/University of Sydney): Nos patriam fugimus: Augustus and contempt for the empire 10.20-11.00: Professor Eric Orlin (University of Puget Sound): Constructing Augustan Italy 11.00-11.30: Morning Tea (CCANESA, Madsen Building) Session 10 Chair: Dr Patricia Watson (University of Sydney) 11.30-12.10: Dr Robert Cowan (University of Sydney): Sideshadowing Actium: Horace’s Epistles, Lollius’ naumachia and the contingency of the Augustan principate 12.10-12.50: Professor Philip Hardie (Trinity College Cambridge): Augustan poetry and the irrational 12.50-2.10: Lunch (CCANESA, Madsen Building) 1.00-2.00: Meeting of the Australasian Women in Ancient World Studies Sydney Chapter: all welcome, regardless of gender. 4 Session 11 Chair: Dr Jane Bellemore (University of Newcastle) 2.10-2.50: Associate Professor Kathryn Welch (University of Sydney): The Shield of Virtues Revisited 2.50-3.30: Professor Alexander Weiss (Leipzig University): Augustus as Reconciler? 3.30-4.10: Dr Tom Stevenson (University of Queensland): Augustus as parens orbis 4.10-4.40: Afternoon tea (CCANESA, Madsen Building) Session 12 Chair: Dr Eleanor Cowan (University of Sydney) 5.00-6.00: Professor Barbara Kellum (Smith College, NY): Winning hearts and minds: Augustan visual strategies Venue: General Lecture Theatre 1 (Main Quad) Conference Dinner: The Grandstand Bar, University of Sydney http://www.thegrandstand.com.au/ 5 Thursday 2 October Session 13 Chair: Professor Gregory Horsley (University of New England) 9.30-10.00: Dr Eleanor Cowan (University of Sydney): Writing the Roman (r)evolution: Velleius and Augustus 10.00-10.30: Mr Nick Geller (University of Michigan): The words that (re)built Rome: architectural imagery in Vitruvius and Augustus 10.30-11.00: Mr Andrew Stiles (Merton College, Oxford): Past, present and future in AD 68-69: Augustus as exemplum 11.00-11.30: Morning Tea (CCANESA, Madsen Building) Session 14 Chair: Dr Andrew Pettinger (University of Sydney) 11.30-12.10: Associate Professor Tom Hillard (Macquarie University): Festinans lente: the role of time in the Augustan achievement 12.10-12.50: Professor Maria Dettenhofer (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich): Augustus and the Senate Venue: Oriental Studies Room 12.50-1.00: Closing Remarks 1.00-2.00: Lunch (optional) at a local pub 6 Abstracts Eleanor Cowan (University of Sydney) Writing the Roman (r)evolution: Velleius and Augustus That Velleius Paterculus was familiar with the Res Gestae has long been established (Woodman, 1983; Hellgouarc’h and Jodry, 1985). This paper further investigates the relationship between the short opus of Velleius (for which no original title survives) and two monumental re-imaginings of Rome’s history – the Forum of Augustus and the Res Gestae. Augustus’ version of Roman history (if we can in fact think of it as ‘his’) sought to establish a monopoly over the way in which this history was, or could be, told. Questions about the impact of ‘Augustan history’ on later writers and thinkers therefore go to the very heart of our investigation into how Augustus’ achievements were understood by his community after his death. The statuary in the Augustan Forum and the relationship between the Forum and the Augustan poets have been the subject of other studies (among many Judge, 1985/2008; Kellum, 1985/2008; Galinsky, 1996). Velleius’ near-contemporary Manilius’ reception of Augustan history-making has also received attention (Chambers, 2005/6; Geiger, 2008; Abry, 2011). This paper offers a reconsideration of Velleius’ references to, and assessment of, Augustus’ achievements. Robert Cowan (University of Sydney) Sideshadowing Actium: Horace’s Epistles, Lollius’ naumachia and the contingency of the Augustan principate Among the personal hobbies which Horace recommends his young friend Lollius conduct at a discreet distance from his potens amicus is the re-enactment of the battle of Actium, which should only be undertaken in the privacy of his father’s estate (Epist. 1.18.58- 64). Critics have noted that the potential offence in this seemingly affirmative celebration of the “miracle of Actium” lies in the casting of Lollius’ brother as his opponent, thus acknowledging the civil nature of the battle which was at least downplayed, if not elided, in official discourse (Ahl 1984, Bowditch 1994, Porter 2002, pace Lange 2009). They have overlooked, however, the further subversive element in Horace’s reference to “whichever of the two (alterutrum)” Victory crowns. This presents the counterfactual possibility, both in the Epistle and in the naumachia, of a parallel mimesis that Antonius might have won the battle of Actium. This instance of “sideshadowing” (Bernstein 1994, Morson 1994) demands to be set in a number of contexts, such as the use of counterfactuals in historiographical depictions 7 of battles and the phenomenon whereby some public naumachiae had outcomes contrary to that of the historical battle they were re-enacting (Coleman 1990, 1993). In particular, the very possibility of an Antonian victory renders the Augustan principate contingent, in opposition to the providential, teleological inevitability with which it, and especially its foundational battle, were depicted elsewhere in Augustan poetry. Such an interpretation is supported by Lucan’s allusion to this passage in his Dyrrachium episode, the only other non- Lucretian instance of alterutrum in extant Latin poetry. Maria H. Dettenhofer (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich) Augustus and the Roman Senate Augustus’ relationship with the Senate was essential for the stability of his rule. Although being by far the richest and most powerful patron in Rome, and wishing to build up a family dynasty, Augustus had no way of ever excluding the Senate from the government. To avoid unmasking himself as rex, he had to disguise his rule as republican. He required, therefore, the Senators as background actors. There were several stages in this crucial relationship between the Senators and the Princeps: from underestimation of young Octavian, followed by total opposition and deeply rooted mistrust towards the winner of the civil war, to a long-lasting era of very different forms of resistance and even a boycott, which finally led to almost complete subservience.
Recommended publications
  • Valerius Maximus on Vice: a Commentary of Facta Et Dicta

    Valerius Maximus on Vice: a Commentary of Facta Et Dicta

    Valerius Maximus on Vice: A Commentary on Facta et Dicta Memorabilia 9.1-11 Jeffrey Murray University of Cape Town Thesis Presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Studies) in the School of Languages and Literatures University of Cape Town June 2016 The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town Abstract The Facta et Dicta Memorabilia of Valerius Maximus, written during the formative stages of the Roman imperial system, survives as a near unique instance of an entire work composed in the genre of Latin exemplary literature. By providing the first detailed historical and historiographical commentary on Book 9 of this prose text – a section of the work dealing principally with vice and immorality – this thesis examines how an author employs material predominantly from the earlier, Republican, period in order to validate the value system which the Romans believed was the basis of their world domination and to justify the reign of the Julio-Claudian family. By detailed analysis of the sources of Valerius’ material, of the way he transforms it within his chosen genre, and of how he frames his exempla, this thesis illuminates the contribution of an often overlooked author to the historiography of the Roman Empire.
  • Senecan Tragedy and Virgil's Aeneid: Repetition and Reversal

    Senecan Tragedy and Virgil's Aeneid: Repetition and Reversal

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 Senecan Tragedy and Virgil's Aeneid: Repetition and Reversal Timothy Hanford Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/427 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] SENECAN TRAGEDY AND VIRGIL’S AENEID: REPETITION AND REVERSAL by TIMOTHY HANFORD A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Classics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2014 ©2014 TIMOTHY HANFORD All Rights Reserved ii This dissertation has been read and accepted by the Graduate Faculty in Classics in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Ronnie Ancona ________________ _______________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee Dee L. Clayman ________________ _______________________________ Date Executive Officer James Ker Joel Lidov Craig Williams Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract SENECAN TRAGEDY AND VIRGIL’S AENEID: REPETITION AND REVERSAL by Timothy Hanford Advisor: Professor Ronnie Ancona This dissertation explores the relationship between Senecan tragedy and Virgil’s Aeneid, both on close linguistic as well as larger thematic levels. Senecan tragic characters and choruses often echo the language of Virgil’s epic in provocative ways; these constitute a contrastive reworking of the original Virgilian contents and context, one that has not to date been fully considered by scholars.
  • ROMAN ARCHITEXTURE: the IDEA of the MONUMENT in the ROMAN IMAGINATION of the AUGUSTAN AGE by Nicholas James Geller a Dissertatio

    ROMAN ARCHITEXTURE: the IDEA of the MONUMENT in the ROMAN IMAGINATION of the AUGUSTAN AGE by Nicholas James Geller a Dissertatio

    ROMAN ARCHITEXTURE: THE IDEA OF THE MONUMENT IN THE ROMAN IMAGINATION OF THE AUGUSTAN AGE by Nicholas James Geller A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Studies) in the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Basil J. Dufallo, Chair Associate Professor Ruth Rothaus Caston Professor Bruce W. Frier Associate Professor Achim Timmermann ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the support and encouragement of many people both within and outside of academia. I would first of all like to thank all those on my committee for reading drafts of my work and providing constructive feedback, especially Basil Dufallo and Ruth R. Caston, both of who read my chapters at early stages and pushed me to find what I wanted to say – and say it well. I also cannot thank enough all the graduate students in the Department of Classical Studies at the University of Michigan for their support and friendship over the years, without either of which I would have never made it this far. Marin Turk in Slavic Languages and Literature deserves my gratitude, as well, for reading over drafts of my chapters and providing insightful commentary from a non-classicist perspective. And I of course must thank the Department of Classical Studies and Rackham Graduate School for all the financial support that I have received over the years which gave me time and the peace of mind to develop my ideas and write the dissertation that follows. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………………ii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS……………………………………………………………………iv ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………………....v CHAPTER I.
  • Los Ludi En La Roma Arcaica

    Los Ludi En La Roma Arcaica

    Martínez-Pinna, Jorge Los ludi en la Roma arcaica De Rebus Antiquis Año 2 Nº 2, 2012 Este documento está disponible en la Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina, repositorio institucional desarrollado por la Biblioteca Central “San Benito Abad”. Su objetivo es difundir y preservar la producción intelectual de la institución. La Biblioteca posee la autorización del autor para su divulgación en línea. Cómo citar el documento: Martínez-Pinna, Jorge. “Los ludi en la Roma arcaica” [en línea], De Rebus Antiquis, 2 (2012). Disponible en: http://bibliotecadigital.uca.edu.ar/repositorio/revistas/los-ludi-roma-arcaica-pinna.pdf [Fecha de consulta:..........] (Se recomienda indicar fecha de consulta al final de la cita. Ej: [Fecha de consulta: 19 de agosto de 2010]). DE REBUS ANTIQUIS Año II, Núm. 2 / 2012 ISSN 2250-4923 LOS LUDI EN LA ROMA ARCAICA* DR. JORGE MARTÍNEZ-PINNA Universidad de Málaga Abstract: This paper it is discussed the public games held in Rome during the monarchy. Its creation is due to religious causes, related to fertility (Consualia, ludi Taurei) or to war (Equirria, equus October). The religious and politic fulfillment of the games materializes in the ludi Romani, introduced by King Tarquinius Priscus. It is also considered the so called lusus Troiae, equestrian game exclusive for young people, and likewise with an archaic origin. Key words: Archaic Rome; Games; King. Resumen: En este artículo se analizan los juegos públicos celebrados en Roma durante el período monárquico. Su creación obedece a motivos religiosos, en relación a la fecundidad (Consualia, ludi Taurei) o a la guerra (Equirria, equus October).
  • Virgil, Aeneid 11 (Pallas & Camilla) 1–224, 498–521, 532–96, 648–89, 725–835 G

    Virgil, Aeneid 11 (Pallas & Camilla) 1–224, 498–521, 532–96, 648–89, 725–835 G

    Virgil, Aeneid 11 (Pallas & Camilla) 1–224, 498–521, 532–96, 648–89, 725–835 G Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary ILDENHARD INGO GILDENHARD AND JOHN HENDERSON A dead boy (Pallas) and the death of a girl (Camilla) loom over the opening and the closing part of the eleventh book of the Aeneid. Following the savage slaughter in Aeneid 10, the AND book opens in a mournful mood as the warring parti es revisit yesterday’s killing fi elds to att end to their dead. One casualty in parti cular commands att enti on: Aeneas’ protégé H Pallas, killed and despoiled by Turnus in the previous book. His death plunges his father ENDERSON Evander and his surrogate father Aeneas into heart-rending despair – and helps set up the foundati onal act of sacrifi cial brutality that caps the poem, when Aeneas seeks to avenge Pallas by slaying Turnus in wrathful fury. Turnus’ departure from the living is prefi gured by that of his ally Camilla, a maiden schooled in the marti al arts, who sets the mold for warrior princesses such as Xena and Wonder Woman. In the fi nal third of Aeneid 11, she wreaks havoc not just on the batt lefi eld but on gender stereotypes and the conventi ons of the epic genre, before she too succumbs to a premature death. In the porti ons of the book selected for discussion here, Virgil off ers some of his most emoti ve (and disturbing) meditati ons on the tragic nature of human existence – but also knows how to lighten the mood with a bit of drag.
  • THE MARS ULTOR COINS of C. 19-16 BC

    THE MARS ULTOR COINS of C. 19-16 BC

    UNIWERSYTET ZIELONOGÓRSKI IN GREMIUM 9/2015 Studia nad Historią, Kulturą i Polityką s . 7-30 Victoria Győri King’s College, London THE MARS ULTOR COINS OF C. 19-16 BC In 42 BC Augustus vowed to build a temple of Mars if he were victorious in aveng- ing the assassination of his adoptive father Julius Caesar1 . While ultio on Brutus and Cassius was a well-grounded theme in Roman society at large and was the principal slogan of Augustus and the Caesarians before and after the Battle of Philippi, the vow remained unfulfilled until 20 BC2 . In 20 BC, Augustus renewed his vow to Mars Ultor when Roman standards lost to the Parthians in 53, 40, and 36 BC were recovered by diplomatic negotiations . The temple of Mars Ultor then took on a new role; it hon- oured Rome’s ultio exacted from the Parthians . Parthia had been depicted as a prime foe ever since Crassus’ defeat at Carrhae in 53 BC . Before his death in 44 BC, Caesar planned a Parthian campaign3 . In 40 BC L . Decidius Saxa was defeated when Parthian forces invaded Roman Syria . In 36 BC Antony’s Parthian campaign was in the end unsuccessful4 . Indeed, the Forum Temple of Mars Ultor was not dedicated until 2 BC when Augustus received the title of Pater Patriae and when Gaius departed to the East to turn the diplomatic settlement of 20 BC into a military victory . Nevertheless, Augustus made his Parthian success of 20 BC the centre of a grand “propagandistic” programme, the principal theme of his new forum, and the reason for renewing his vow to build a temple to Mars Ultor .
  • The Idea of the Labyrinth

    The Idea of the Labyrinth

    ·THE IDEA OF · THE LABYRINTH · THE IDEA OF · THE LABYRINTH from Classical Antiquity through the Middle Ages Penelope Reed Doob CORNELL UNIVERSITY PRESS ITHACA AND LONDON Open access edition funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities/Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program. Copyright © 1990 by Cornell University First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 1992 Second paperback printing 2019 All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. Visit our website at cornellpress.cornell.edu. Printed in the United States of America ISBN 978-0-8014-2393-2 (cloth: alk. paper) ISBN 978-1-5017-3845-6 (pbk.: alk. paper) ISBN 978-1-5017-3846-3 (pdf) ISBN 978-1-5017-3847-0 (epub/mobi) Librarians: A CIP catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress An open access (OA) ebook edition of this title is available under the following Creative Commons license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by- nc-nd/4.0/. For more information about Cornell University Press’s OA program or to download our OA titles, visit cornellopen.org. Jacket illustration: Photograph courtesy of the Soprintendenza Archeologica, Milan. For GrahamEric Parker worthy companion in multiplicitous mazes and in memory of JudsonBoyce Allen and Constantin Patsalas Contents List of Plates lX Acknowledgments: Four Labyrinths xi Abbreviations XVll Introduction: Charting the Maze 1 The Cretan Labyrinth Myth 11 PART ONE THE LABYRINTH IN THE CLASSICAL AND EARLY CHRISTIAN PERIODS 1.
  • Augustanism in Ovid's Ars Amatoria

    Augustanism in Ovid's Ars Amatoria

    The Art of Making Oneself Hated: Rethinking (Anti-)Augustanism in Ovid’s Ars Amatoria The Art of Love: Bimillennial Essays on Ovid's Ars Amatoria and Remedia Amoris Steven Green Print publication date: 2007 Print ISBN-13: 9780199277773 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2010 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199277773.001.0001 The Art of Making Oneself Hated: Rethinking (Anti-)Augustanism in Ovid’s Ars Amatoria Sergio Casali DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199277773.003.0011 Abstract and Keywords This chapter focuses on the most overtly ‘Augustan’ part of the Ars – the Parthian expedition of Gaius Caesar (1.171-228) – and invites us to read the event as an episode that exposes tensions in the dynastic family, and draws attention to the spectacle and theatricality of the Emperor's Parthian campaign. Keywords: Ars Amatoria, Remedia Amoris, Augustus, politics, Rome, Parthia, Gaius Caesar My subtitle implies that I want to strike a balance, or to discuss the question of the Augustanism/anti-Augustanism of the Ars from a theoretical point of view. In fact, I won’t be doing that. The ‘Augustan’ side of the question has been treated in the best possible way by Mario Labate in his book L’arte di farsi amare,1 the ‘anti-Augustan’ side by Alison Sharrock, particularly in her article on ‘Ovid and the Politics of Reading’,2 and the ‘aporetic’ side by Duncan Kennedy and Alessandro Barchiesi.3 I couldn’t do it better. So, the first part of my title is more relevant for my chapter. It makes fairly clear, I think, my predilection for a good old anti-Augustan approach to Ovid.
  • Imperial Authority and the Providence of Monotheism in Orosius's Historiae Adversus Paganos

    Imperial Authority and the Providence of Monotheism in Orosius's Historiae Adversus Paganos

    Imperial Authority and the Providence of Monotheism in Orosius’s Historiae adversus paganos Victoria Leonard B.A. (Cardiff); M.A. (Cardiff) A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy School of History, Archaeology, and Religion Cardiff University August 2014 ii Declaration This work has not been submitted in substance for any other degree or award at this or any other university or place of learning, nor is being submitted concurrently in candidature for any degree or other award. Signed ………………………………… (candidate) Date ……………………… STATEMENT 1 This thesis is being submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD. Signed ………………………………… (candidate) Date ……………………… STATEMENT 2 This thesis is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged by explicit references. The views expressed are my own. Signed ………………………………… (candidate) Date ……………………… STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed ………………………………… (candidate) Date………………………… STATEMENT 4: PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BAR ON ACCESS I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loans after expiry of a bar on access previously approved by the Academic Standards & Quality Committee. Signed ………………………………… (candidate) Date………………………… iii Cover Illustration An image of an initial 'P' with a man, thought to be Orosius, holding a book. Acanthus leaves extend into the margins. On the same original manuscript page (f. 7) there is an image of a roundel enclosing arms in the lower margin.
  • THE CONQUEST of ACRE De Expugnata Accone

    THE CONQUEST of ACRE De Expugnata Accone

    1 THE CONQUEST OF ACRE De Expugnata Accone A Poetic Narrative of the Third Crusade Critical edition, translated with an introduction and notes by Tedd A. Wimperis Boston College Advanced Study Grant Summer 2009 2 Introduction In the year 1099 AD, the First Crusade, undertaken by European nobles and overseen by the Christian church, seized control of Jerusalem after a campaign of four years, setting up a Latin kingdom based in that city and establishing a Western presence in the Near East that would endure for two hundred years. After a series of clashes with Muslim armies, a second crusade was called that lasted from 1147-49. Then, in 1187, the delicate balance of powers erupted into conflict, and a unified Islamic force under the leadership of the legendary Saladin, Sultan of Egypt and Syria, swept through the Holy Land, cutting a swathe through the Crusader States until it brought Jerusalem itself to surrender. In the wake of this calamity, Europe fixed its intentions on reclaiming the land, and the Western powers again took up the Cross in what would be the Third Crusade. The crusade launched in 1189, and would thunder on until 1192, when the warring armies reached a stalemate and a treaty was signed between Saladin and King Richard I of England. But the very first engagement of the Third Crusade, and the longest-lasting, was the siege of Acre, a city on the coast of Palestine northwest of Jerusalem, important both militarily and as a center of trade. Acre was vigorously defended by the Muslim occupiers and fiercely fought for by the assembled might of the West for a grueling two years that saw thousands of casualties, famine, disease, and a brutal massacre.
  • Christian Morals

    Christian Morals

    Christian Morals Author(s): Browne, Sir Thomas (1605-1682) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Description: i Contents Title Page 1 The Life of Sir Thomas Browne. 3 Christian Morals 23 Dedication 24 Preface 25 Part I. 26 Part II. 42 Part III. 52 Indexes 70 Greek Words and Phrases 71 Latin Words and Phrases 72 Index of Pages of the Print Edition 74 ii This PDF file is from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library, www.ccel.org. The mission of the CCEL is to make classic Christian books available to the world. • This book is available in PDF, HTML, and other formats. See http://www.ccel.org/ccel/browne/morals.html. • Discuss this book online at http://www.ccel.org/node/3676. The CCEL makes CDs of classic Christian literature available around the world through the Web and through CDs. We have distributed thousands of such CDs free in developing countries. If you are in a developing country and would like to receive a free CD, please send a request by email to [email protected]. The Christian Classics Ethereal Library is a self supporting non-profit organization at Calvin College. If you wish to give of your time or money to support the CCEL, please visit http://www.ccel.org/give. This PDF file is copyrighted by the Christian Classics Ethereal Library. It may be freely copied for non-commercial purposes as long as it is not modified. All other rights are re- served. Written permission is required for commercial use. iii Title Page Title Page CHRISTIAN MORALS.
  • Imperial Messaging in the Redefinition of the Roman Landscape Camille Victoria Delgado Vassar College, Cadelgado@Vassar.Edu

    Imperial Messaging in the Redefinition of the Roman Landscape Camille Victoria Delgado Vassar College, [email protected]

    Vassar College Digital Window @ Vassar Senior Capstone Projects 2016 Re-creation and commemoration: Imperial messaging in the redefinition of the Roman landscape Camille Victoria Delgado Vassar College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalwindow.vassar.edu/senior_capstone Recommended Citation Delgado, Camille Victoria, "Re-creation and commemoration: Imperial messaging in the redefinition of the Roman landscape" (2016). Senior Capstone Projects. Paper 573. This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Window @ Vassar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Window @ Vassar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! RE$CREATION!AND!COMMEMORATION! Imperial!Messaging!in!the!Redefinition!of!the!Roman! Landscape! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Camille!Victoria!Liboro!Delgado! Greek!and!Roman!Studies!Senior!Thesis! Fall!Semester!2015! Vassar!College TABLE!OF!CONTENTS! ! ! ! ! INTRODUCTION) 1) ! ! ! ! CHAPTER)1:)Imperator) 10) I. Overview! 10! II. Temples! 15! III. Administrative!Buildings! 18! IV. Public!Entertainment!Works! 20! V. Victory!Monuments! 23! VI. Public!Infrastructure!Works! 27! VII. Augustus’!Mausoleum! 29! VIII. Conclusion! 33! Appendix) 36! ! ! ! ! CHAPTER)2:)Il)Duce) 38) I. Overview! 38! II. Redesigning!Roma! 41! III. Foro!Mussolini! 50! IV. Esposizione!Universale!Roma! 56! V. Conclusion! 60! Appendix) 63! ! ! ! ! ! ! CONCLUSION) 70) ) ) ) ) BIBLIOGRAPHY)