BGN/PCGN Romanization Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sailors, Tailors, Cooks, and Crooks: on Loanwords and Neglected Lives in Indian Ocean Ports
Itinerario, Vol. 42, No. 3, 516–548. © 2018 Research Institute for History, Leiden University. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/S0165115318000645 Sailors, Tailors, Cooks, and Crooks: On Loanwords and Neglected Lives in Indian Ocean Ports TOM HOOGERVORST* E-mail: [email protected] A renewed interested in Indian Ocean studies has underlined possibilities of the transnational. This study highlights lexical borrowing as an analytical tool to deepen our understanding of cultural exchanges between Indian Ocean ports during the long nineteenth century, comparing loanwords from several Asian and African languages and demonstrating how doing so can re-establish severed links between communities. In this comparative analysis, four research avenues come to the fore as specifically useful to explore the dynamics of non-elite contact in this part of the world: (1) nautical jargon, (2) textile terms, (3) culinary terms, and (4) slang associated with society’s lower strata. These domains give prominence to a spectrum of cultural brokers frequently overlooked in the wider literature. It is demonstrated through con- crete examples that an analysis of lexical borrowing can add depth and substance to existing scholarship on interethnic contact in the Indian Ocean, providing methodolo- gical inspiration to examine lesser studied connections. This study reveals no unified linguistic landscape, but several key individual connections between the ports of the Indian Ocean frequented by Persian, Hindustani, and Malay-speaking communities. -
A Chinese Mobile Phone Input Method Based on the Dynamic and Self-Study Language Model
A Chinese Mobile Phone Input Method Based on the Dynamic and Self-study Language Model Qiaoming Zhu, Peifeng Li, Gu Ping, and Qian Peide School of Computer Science & Technology of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006 {qmzhu, pfli, pgu, pdqian}@suda.edu.cn Abstract. This paper birefly introduces a Chinese digital input method named as CKCDIM (CKC Digital Input Method) and then applies it to the Symbian OS as an example, and it also proposes a framework of input method which adopted the Client/Server architecture for the handheld computers. To improve the performance of CKCDIM, this paper puts forward a dynamic and self-study language model which based on a general language model and user language model, and proposes two indexes which are the average number of pressed-keys (ANPK) and the hit rate of first characters (HRFC) to measure the performance of the input method. Meanwhile, this paper brings forward a modified Church-Gale smoothing method to reduce the size of general language model to meet the need of mobile phone. At last, the experiments prove that the dynamic and self-study language model is a steady model and can improve the performance of CKCDIM. Keywords: Chinese Digital Input Method, Architecture of Input Method, Dynamic and Self-study Language Model, HRFC, ANPK. 1 Introduction With the developing of communication technology and the popularization of the mobile phone in China, the use of text message in mobile phone is growing rapidly. According to CCTV financial news report, the total number of Short Message Service use will grow from 300 billions in 2005 to 450 billions in 2006 in China. -
Database Globalization Support Guide
Oracle® Database Database Globalization Support Guide 19c E96349-05 May 2021 Oracle Database Database Globalization Support Guide, 19c E96349-05 Copyright © 2007, 2021, Oracle and/or its affiliates. Primary Author: Rajesh Bhatiya Contributors: Dan Chiba, Winson Chu, Claire Ho, Gary Hua, Simon Law, Geoff Lee, Peter Linsley, Qianrong Ma, Keni Matsuda, Meghna Mehta, Valarie Moore, Cathy Shea, Shige Takeda, Linus Tanaka, Makoto Tozawa, Barry Trute, Ying Wu, Peter Wallack, Chao Wang, Huaqing Wang, Sergiusz Wolicki, Simon Wong, Michael Yau, Jianping Yang, Qin Yu, Tim Yu, Weiran Zhang, Yan Zhu This software and related documentation are provided under a license agreement containing restrictions on use and disclosure and are protected by intellectual property laws. Except as expressly permitted in your license agreement or allowed by law, you may not use, copy, reproduce, translate, broadcast, modify, license, transmit, distribute, exhibit, perform, publish, or display any part, in any form, or by any means. Reverse engineering, disassembly, or decompilation of this software, unless required by law for interoperability, is prohibited. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice and is not warranted to be error-free. If you find any errors, please report them to us in writing. If this is software or related documentation that is delivered to the U.S. Government or anyone licensing it on behalf of the U.S. Government, then the following notice is applicable: U.S. GOVERNMENT END USERS: Oracle programs (including any operating system, integrated software, any programs embedded, installed or activated on delivered hardware, and modifications of such programs) and Oracle computer documentation or other Oracle data delivered to or accessed by U.S. -
Romanization Examples
Romanization examples Each title of a language or a writing system is followed by a note on the appropriate romanization system used (UN = United Nations, BGN/PCGN = US Board on Geographic Names and Permanent Committee on Geographical Names for British Official Use) Amharic [UN 1967, I/17] Lao [national 1966] ኢትዮጵያ Ityop’ya [ Ethiopia ], አዲስ አበባ Addis Abe ̱ ba ລາວ Lao [ Laos ], ວງຈັ ນ Viangchan Arabic [UN 1972, II/8] Macedonian Cyrillic [UN 1977, III/11] Jaz īrat al-‘Arab [ Arabian Peninsula ] Скопје Skopje, Битола Bitola ز رة ارب Armenian [BGN/PCGN 1981] Malayalam [UN 1972, II/11; 1977, III/12] Հայաստան Hayastan [ Armenia ], Երևան Yerevan Kera ḷaṁ, Tiruvanantapura ṁ Assamese [UN 1972, II/11; 1977, III/12] Maldivian [national 1987] Asam [ Assam ], Dichhapura [ Dispur ] ޖ އ ރ ހ ވ ދ Dhivehi Raajje [ Maldives ], ލ މ Maale Bengali [UN 1972, II/11; 1977, III/12] Marathi [UN 1972, II/11; 1977, III/12] Bāṁ lādesh, Dhaka महारा Mah ārāṣhṭra, मुंबई Mu ṁba ī Bulgarian [UN 1977, III/10] Mongolian (Cyrillic) [BGN/PCGN 1964] Република България Republika B ǎlgarija Монгол улс Mongol uls, Улаанбаатар Ulaanbaatar Burmese [BGN/PCGN 1970] Nepalese [UN 1972, II/11; 1977, III/12] ြမန်မာ Myanma, ရန်ကန် Yangôn नेपाल Nepāl, काठमाड Kāṭhm āḍau ṁ [Kathmandu ] Byelorussian [national 2007] Беларусь Bielaru ś, Минск Minsk Oriya [UN 1972, II/11; 1977, III/12] Chinese [UN 1977, III/8] Oṙish ā, Bhubaneshbar 中国 Zhongguo, 北京 Beijing Pashto [BGN/PCGN 1968] XQY Kābulل ,Afgh ānist ān اQRSTQUVن [Dzongkha [national 1997 འག་ལ Drukyuel [Bhutan ], ཐིམ་ Thimphu Persian -
Central Eurasian Studies Society Fourth Annual Conference October
Central Eurasian Studies Society Fourth Annual Conference October 2- 5, 2003 Hosted by: Program on Central Asia and the Caucasus Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies Harvard University Cambridge, Mass., USA Table of Contents Conference Schedule ................................................................................... 1 Film Program ......................................................................................... 2 Panel Grids ................................................................................................ 3 List of Panels .............................................................................................. 5 Schedule of Panels ...................................................................................... 7 Friday • Session I • 9:00 am-10:45 am ..................................................... 7 Friday • Session II • 11:00 am-12:45 pm .................................................. 9 Friday • Session III • 2:00 pm-3:45 pm .................................................. 11 Friday • Session IV • 4:00 pm-5:45 pm .................................................. 12 Saturday • Session I • 9:00 am-10:45 am ............................................... 14 Saturday • Session II • 11:00 am-12:45 pm ............................................ 16 Saturday • Session III • 2:00 pm-3:45 pm .............................................. 18 Saturday • Session IV • 4:00 pm-6:30 pm .............................................. 20 Sunday • Session I • 9:00 am-10:45 am ................................................ -
Discover Your Phone
Discover Your Phone accept, except as required by applicable law, liability for any error, omission or discrepancy between this user 262000 color guide and the product described. The device is meant to main screen be connected to GSM/GPRS networks. Back of the phone: Charger/USB camera lens connector Hard keys Stylus pen Also called Red key or On/Off key. Touch screen Hang up key • In menu or edit mode, short press to return to idle screen. Camera key • During an incoming call or call in progress, press to end the call Hang up, or reject the call. Cancel and On/Off key • When the phone is switched Answer key off, long press to switch on the Up key, phone. keypad lock • When the phone is switched Down key, Vibration on, long press to switch off the on/off key phone anytime. Also called Green key or Send key: Philips continuously strives to improve its products. Answer key • Answer a call or dial a phone Therefore, Philips reserves the rights to revise this user number guide or withdraw it at any time without prior notice. • In idle mode, press to view the Philips provides this user guide “as is” and does not dialed calls list. Up key • Browse the menu/list on the Side camera • In idle mode, short press to and same menu level. key enter the camera, long press to Down key • Browse SMS contents or other enter video camera. long text messages. • When in camera/video camera • Scroll to the previous or next preview mode, short press to picture when viewing pictures. -
The Impact of Arabic Orthography on Literacy and Economic Development in Afghanistan
International Journal of Education, Culture and Society 2019; 4(1): 1-12 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ijecs doi: 10.11648/j.ijecs.20190401.11 ISSN: 2575-3460 (Print); ISSN: 2575-3363 (Online) The Impact of Arabic Orthography on Literacy and Economic Development in Afghanistan Anwar Wafi Hayat Department of Economics, Kabul University, Kabul, Afghanistan Email address: To cite this article: Anwar Wafi Hayat. The Impact of Arabic Orthography on Literacy and Economic Development in Afghanistan. International Journal of Education, Culture and Society . Vol. 4, No. 1, 2019, pp. 1-12. doi: 10.11648/j.ijecs.20190401.11 Received : October 15, 2018; Accepted : November 8, 2018; Published : January 31, 2019 Abstract: Currently, Pashto and Dari (Afghan Persian), the two official languages, and other Afghan languages are written in modified Arabic alphabets. Persian adopted the Arabic alphabets in the ninth century, and Pashto, in sixteenth century CE. This article looks at how the Arabic Orthography has hindered Literacy and Economic development in Afghanistan. The article covers a comprehensive analysis of Arabic Orthography adopted for writing Dari and Pashto, a study of the proposed Arabic Language reforms, and research conducted about reading and writing difficulty in Arabic script by Arab intellectuals. The study shows how adopting modified Latin alphabets for a language can improve literacy level which further plays its part in the economic development of a country. The article dives into the history of Romanization of languages in the Islamic World and its impact on Literacy and economic development in those countries. Romanization of the Afghan Official languages and its possible impact on Literacy, Economy, and Peace in Afghanistan is discussed. -
The Case of the Iraqi Disputed Territories Declaration Submitted By
Title: Education as an Ethnic Defence Strategy: The Case of the Iraqi Disputed Territories Declaration Submitted by Kelsey Jayne Shanks to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Politics, October 2013. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Kelsey Shanks ................................................................................. 1 Abstract The oil-rich northern districts of Iraq were long considered a reflection of the country with a diversity of ethnic and religious groups; Arabs, Turkmen, Kurds, Assyrians, and Yezidi, living together and portraying Iraq’s demographic makeup. However, the Ba’ath party’s brutal policy of Arabisation in the twentieth century created a false demographic and instigated the escalation of identity politics. Consequently, the region is currently highly contested with the disputed territories consisting of 15 districts stretching across four northern governorates and curving from the Syrian to Iranian borders. The official contest over the regions administration has resulted in a tug-of-war between Baghdad and Erbil that has frequently stalled the Iraqi political system. Subsequently, across the region, minority groups have been pulled into a clash over demographic composition as each disputed districts faces ethnically defined claims. The ethnic basis to territorial claims has amplified the discourse over linguistic presence, cultural representation and minority rights; and the insecure environment, in which sectarian based attacks are frequent, has elevated debates over territorial representation to the height of ethnic survival issues. -
TURKMEN, TURKMENO, TURKMÈNE Language Family
TURKMEN, TURKMENO, TURKMÈNE Language family: Altaic, Turkic, Southern, Turkmenian. Language codes: ISO 639-1 tk ISO 639-2 tuk ISO 639-3 tuk Glottolog: turk1304. Linguasphere: part of 44-AAB-a. ﺗﻮرﮐﻤﻦ ,Beste izen batzuk (Türkmençe, Türkmen dili, Түркменче, Түркмен дили :(ﺗﻴﻠی ,ﺗﻮرﮐﻤﻨﭽﻪ torkomani alt turkmen [TCK]. turkman alt turkmen [TCK]. trukhmen alt turkmen [TCK]. trukhmeny alt turkmen [TCK]. trukmen alt turkmen [TCK]. trukmen dial turkmen [TCK]. turkmani alt turkmen [TCK]. turkmanian alt turkmen [TCK]. turkmen [TCK] hizk, Turkmenistan; baita Afganistan, Alemania, AEB, Iran, Irak, Kazakstan, Kirgizistan, Pakistan, Errusia (Asia), Tajikistan, Turkia (Asia) eta Uzbekistan ere. turkmenler alt turkmen [TCK]. turkoman alt turkmen [TCK]. turkomani alt turkmen [TCK]. turkomans alt turkmen [TCK]. AFGANISTAN turkmen (turkoman, trukmen, turkman) [TCK] 500.000 hiztun (1995). Turkmenistanen mugan zehar, bereziki Fariab eta Badghis probintzien mugetan. Batzuk Andkhoi eta Herat hirietan. Altaic, Turkic, Southern, Turkmenian. Dialektoak: salor, teke (tekke, chagatai, jagatai), ersari, sariq, yomut. Dialekto diferentzia markatuak. Seguruenez ersari dialektoa nagusi Afganistanen. Helebitasuna pashtoerarekin. Errefuxiatuen talde bat Kabulen. Sirian ‘turkmeniar’ deitu herritarrak azerbaijaneraren hiztunak dira. Arabiar idazkera. Pertsona eskolatuenak gai dira zirilikoz irakurtzeko. Egunkariak. Ikus sarrera nagusia Turkmenistanen. IRAN turmen (torkomani) [TCK] 2.000.000 hiztun (1997), edo herriaren % 3,17 (1997). Ipar- ekialdea, batez ere Mazandaran Probintzia, Turkmenistanen mugan zehar; garrantzizko zentroak dira Gonbad-e Kavus eta Pahlavi Dezh. Altaic, Turkic, Southern, Turkmenian. Dialektoak: anauli, khasarli, nerezim, nokhurli (nohur), chavdur, esari (esary), goklen (goklan), salyr, saryq, teke (tekke), yomud (yomut), trukmen. Elebitasuna farsierarekin. Iranen ez da hizkuntza literarioa. Asko erdi-nomadak dira. Talde etnikoak: yomut, goklan. Hauek irakur dezakete arabiar idazkera. Irrati programak. Ikus sarrera nagusia Turkmenistanen. -
Inventory of Romanization Tools
Inventory of Romanization Tools Standards Intellectual Management Office Library and Archives Canad Ottawa 2006 Inventory of Romanization Tools page 1 Language Script Romanization system for an English Romanization system for a French Alternate Romanization system catalogue catalogue Amharic Ethiopic ALA-LC 1997 BGN/PCGN 1967 UNGEGN 1967 (I/17). http://www.eki.ee/wgrs/rom1_am.pdf Arabic Arabic ALA-LC 1997 ISO 233:1984.Transliteration of Arabic BGN/PCGN 1956 characters into Latin characters NLC COPIES: BS 4280:1968. Transliteration of Arabic characters NL Stacks - TA368 I58 fol. no. 00233 1984 E DMG 1936 NL Stacks - TA368 I58 fol. no. DIN-31635, 1982 00233 1984 E - Copy 2 I.G.N. System 1973 (also called Variant B of the Amended Beirut System) ISO 233-2:1993. Transliteration of Arabic characters into Latin characters -- Part 2: Lebanon national system 1963 Arabic language -- Simplified transliteration Morocco national system 1932 Royal Jordanian Geographic Centre (RJGC) System Survey of Egypt System (SES) UNGEGN 1972 (II/8). http://www.eki.ee/wgrs/rom1_ar.pdf Update, April 2004: http://www.eki.ee/wgrs/ung22str.pdf Armenian Armenian ALA-LC 1997 ISO 9985:1996. Transliteration of BGN/PCGN 1981 Armenian characters into Latin characters Hübschmann-Meillet. Assamese Bengali ALA-LC 1997 ISO 15919:2001. Transliteration of Hunterian System Devanagari and related Indic scripts into Latin characters UNGEGN 1977 (III/12). http://www.eki.ee/wgrs/rom1_as.pdf 14/08/2006 Inventory of Romanization Tools page 2 Language Script Romanization system for an English Romanization system for a French Alternate Romanization system catalogue catalogue Azerbaijani Arabic, Cyrillic ALA-LC 1997 ISO 233:1984.Transliteration of Arabic characters into Latin characters. -
DICOM PS3.5 2021C
PS3.5 DICOM PS3.5 2021d - Data Structures and Encoding Page 2 PS3.5: DICOM PS3.5 2021d - Data Structures and Encoding Copyright © 2021 NEMA A DICOM® publication - Standard - DICOM PS3.5 2021d - Data Structures and Encoding Page 3 Table of Contents Notice and Disclaimer ........................................................................................................................................... 13 Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................ 15 1. Scope and Field of Application ............................................................................................................................. 17 2. Normative References ....................................................................................................................................... 19 3. Definitions ....................................................................................................................................................... 23 4. Symbols and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................. 27 5. Conventions ..................................................................................................................................................... 29 6. Value Encoding ............................................................................................................................................... -
Task Force for the Review of the Romanization of Greek RE: Report of the Task Force
CC:DA/TF/ Review of the Romanization of Greek/3 Report, May 18, 2010 page: 1 TO: ALA/ALCTS/CCS/Committee on Cataloging: Description and Access (CC:DA) FROM: ALA/ALCTS/CCS/CC:DA Task Force for the Review of the Romanization of Greek RE: Report of the Task Force CHARGE TO THE TASK FORCE The Task Force is charged with assessing draft Romanization tables for Greek, educating CC:DA as necessary, and preparing necessary reports to support the revision process, leading to ultimate approval of an updated ALA-LC Romanization scheme for Greek. In particular, the Task Force should review the May 2010 draft for a timely report by ALA to LC. Review of subsequent tables may be called for, depending on the viability of this latest draft. The ALA-LC Romanization table - Greek, Proposed Revision May 2010 is located at the LC Policy and Standards Division website at: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/romanization/greekrev.pdf [archived as a supplement to this report on the CC:DA site] BACKGROUND INFORMATION FROM THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS We note that when the May 2010 Greek table was presented for general review via email, the LC Policy and Standards Division offered the following information comparing the May 2010 table with the existing table, Greek (Also Coptic), available at the LC policy and Standards Division web site at: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/romanization/greek.pdf: "The Policy and Standards Division has taken another look at the revised Greek Romanization tables in conjunction with comments from the library community and its own staff with knowledge of Greek.