Two Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT) Semiconductor Detectors, a Lacl3(Ce) Scintillator, and an Nai(Tl) Scintillator
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Performance comparison of four compact room- temperature detectors – two cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) semiconductor detectors, a LaCl3(Ce) scintillator, and an NaI(Tl) scintillator John K. Hartwell, Member IEEE, Robert J. Gehrke, and Michael E. Mc Ilwain measurement scenarios where portability, compact design, Abstract— The performance characteristics of four compact, and freedom from cryogenics are primary considerations. room-temperature detectors – two scintillators and two A recent publication provided performance comparison semiconductor detectors – were studied. All are commercially- data on three detectors including a ∅10 cm X 10 cm NaI(Tl), available detectors. The two scintillators were a ∅13 mm X a ∅55 mm X 54 mm HPGe detector, and a ∅9 mm X 2 mm 13 mm lanthanum chloride [LaCl3(Ce)] detector and a ∅25 mm X 25 mm sodium iodide [NaI(Tl)] detector. The two CdTe detector [1]. Our work, reported in this paper, provides semiconductor detectors were a 10 mm X 10 mm X 3 mm complimentary assessment data on a different suite of four cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) detector with a coplanar gridded highly portable detectors, including work with the promising anode and a 5 mm X 5 mm X 5 mm CZT detector with an new scintillator LaCl3(Ce). extended cathode. The efficiency, resolution, and peak shape of these devices are compared. Since LaCl (Ce) is a relatively new 3 II. EXPERIMENTAL METHOD commercial scintillator material, additional information on the performance of this detector is presented. Specifically, the The electronics system used for these evaluations consisted impact of naturally-occurring radioactive 138La and additional of a preamplifier, a linear amplifier (Tennelec TC244 or Ortec contamination from alpha-emitting radionuclides on the 460), and an multichannel analyzer (Amptek MCA8000A) background measured with this detector are discussed. along with the required high voltage bias supply (ORTEC 556 Index Terms— Gamma-ray spectroscopy detectors, or ORTEC 459). Amplifier pulse shaping times and system LaCl3(Ce) scintillation detectors, Room temperature semiconductor detectors gains were adjusted to match the requirements of the detector and the desired peak positioning. All spectra were stored in I. INTRODUCTION 2048 channels. While High Purity Germanium (HPGe) detectors, with their A set of three sealed point sources were used for this evaluation. The source radionuclides, their activities and unexcelled gamma-ray energy resolution, are often the best 57 choice for gamma-ray spectroscopy applications; the estimated total uncertainties on 01-January-04 were Co ± 60 ± 137 ± requirement for cryogenic cooling during operation (1.95 0.09 kBq), Co (117 5 kBq), and Cs (360 11 kBq). ± complicates their use in certain applications. This work Source-to-detector distances were 10.0 0.2 cm unless compares the detection efficiency and resolution capabilities otherwise noted. The system gain for each detector was of four alternative gamma-ray spectrometric detectors that adjusted to position like peaks in the same channel. Thus the 57 operate at room temperature. Although none of these units spectra of Co taken with all four detectors had the 122 keV 137 provides the combination of resolution and detection peak in channel 368 ± 3, the Cs 662 keV peak in channel efficiency afforded by a HPGe, they have performance 976 ± 5 and the 60Co 1332 keV peak in channel 1737 ± 3. features that make them attractive for certain radiation Two cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) detectors were evaluated in this study. The first (designated detector C5) was a 5 mm X 5 mm X 5 mm (125 mm3) crystal obtained from eV Products. This detector is a quasi-hemispherical device with a Manuscript received 24-Sept.-2004. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Through the INEEL LDRD Program Under DOE Idaho Operations full area anode and extended cathode that provides improved Office Contract DE-AC07-99ID13727. charge collection characteristics and thus improved resolution J. K. Hartwell is with the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental and peak shape relative to a pure planar design [2]. The Laboratory (INEEL), PO Box 1625-2114 Idaho Falls, ID 83415-2114. Phone: 208-526-9366; Fax: 208-526-9267; e-mail [email protected] detector is packaged along with a hybrid preamplifier in an R. J. Gehrke and M. E. Mc Ilwain are also with the INEEL. 0-7803-8701-5/04/$20.00 (C) 2004 IEEE integral package ∅12 mm by 89 mm. During testing the The base was an Ortec Model 266 and the AC-coupled detector bias voltage was +1000 V. The amplifier shaping dynode output signal was used directly as input to the TC244 time was 0.375 µsec. Testing determined that the face of the amplifier. The high voltage was set to +780 V. The amplifier detector was 13 ± 2 mm back from the detector end cap. Thus, shaping time was 1.5 µsec. to achieve a source-to-detector distance of 10.0 cm, the 57Co The spectra were acquired using the Amptek program and 137Cs sources were positioned 8.7 cm from the detector PMCA Version 2.01 specifically provided for control of the C5 end cap. The 60Co source was counted at a 5 cm source-to- 8000A Pocket MCA. Most net photopeak areas were detector distance or 3.7 cm from the end cap; and the data computed using a simple region-of-interest summation with a corrected to a source-to-detector distance of 10 cm using an stepped background subtraction, and photopeak resolution inverse square assumption. values (FWHM) were computed using analytical interpolation The second CZT detector (designated CP) was a 10 mm X of the channel contents, an approach that provides a better and 10 mm X 3 mm (300 mm3) detector obtained from Spire more consistent measure of the overall peak widths when Corporation. This crystal was equipped with a coplanar- photopeak shapes are non-Gaussian than do FWHM values gridded anode to significantly improve the unit’s resolution derived from peak fitting results. An exception to this performance [3]. The detector was packaged along with the approach was for the area calculation of the 122 keV peak of 57 required preamplifiers and analog subtraction circuit in a Co in the spectra acquired with the two scintillation ∅3.2 cm by 13 cm unit. The detector was operated with a bias detectors. The resolution of the L2 and N1 detectors was voltage of – 600 V and a grid bias of – 60 V. The amplifier insufficient to resolve the 122 keV and the 136 keV peaks. shaping time was 0.375 µsec. All sources were counted at a Consequently, the area of the 122 keV peak in these spectra distance of 9 cm from the detector end cap. However, testing was computed by non-linear least squares fitting of the 122- indicated that the detector face was located 1.8 ± 0.4 cm back 136 keV peak region as a doublet with Gaussian functions and from the anodized aluminum end cap. Consequently, sources a step background. counted at a source-to-end cap distance of 9 cm were actually 10.8 ± 0.4 cm from the detector. The results for this detector III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION presented in this report have been adjusted to a source-to- detector distance of 10 cm by the inverse square law. Table 1 compares the measured efficiency in counts per Two scintillation detectors were included in this evaluation emitted gamma-ray at a 10 cm source-to-detector distance, – a LaCl3(Ce) and a NaI(Tl) detector. The LaCl3(Ce) detector and the resolution at half maximum height (FWHM) and the (designated L2) was a ∅13 mm X 13 mm (1.7 cm3) crystal of full width at one-tenth maximum height (FWTM) of the four LaCl3 with 10% Ce. This scintillation material is reported to detectors for the major peaks of the three radionuclides have an excellent combination of scintillation light output and counted. All uncertainties are quoted at one estimated resolution [4]. The detector was an integral unit coupled to a standard deviation. Photonis XP1911 photomultiplier tube with a dividing Additionally, Figure 1 plots the spectral region around the 137 network configured for positive high voltage. A high voltage 662 keV peak for the Cs point source at 10 cm from each setting of +800 V was used. Some spectra were acquired detector. Not only does this figure illustrate the comparative using a delay line amplifier (ORTEC 460) and a 0.25 µsec efficiency and resolution of the detectors tested, it highlights shaping time. Other spectra used the TC244 amplifier and a the significant peak shape differences noted with certain of shaping time of either 0.375 or 6 µsec. All sources were these detectors. counted at a source-to-detector distance of 10 cm. Only the NaI(Tl) detector N1 performed exactly as In addition to the source spectra acquired, a number of expected. Although the N1 resolution performance was the background spectra were taken with the LaCl3(Ce) detector. poorest of the four tested detectors, it exhibited the expected Background spectra were of particular interest with this photopeak efficiency and peak shape. Details regarding the detector for two reasons. First, Lanthanum has a naturally- performance of the other three detectors are discussed below. occurring radioactive isotope, 138La (1.05X1011 year half-life) 3 present in an abundance of about 0.09% in natural La and we A. The 125 mm CZT detector (C5) wanted to assess the effect of this 138La on the crystal The least efficient (and most compact) of the detectors 3 background. Second, during preliminary work with this studied is the 125 mm eV Products detector (C5). This unit scintillator, we and another researcher [5] noted a puzzling set incorporates what the manufacturer calls CAPturea technology of broad peaks in the background at energies between about that uses a full area anode and a cathode contact plated on the 1500 and 3000 keV.