DOCSLIB.ORG

Tsunami Decision Support Systems TDSS – 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tsunami Decision Support Systems TDSS – 2015 Tsunami Decision Support Systems TDSS – 2015 Outcomes of the 6th JRC ECML Crisis Management Technology Workshop Alessandro Annunziato, Chiara Fonio, Francesco Mugnai, Daniele Galliano 2 0 1 5 Report EUR 27455 EN 1 European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen Contact information Alessandro Annunziato Address: Joint Research Centre, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, TP 680, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy E-mail: alessandro.annunziato @jrc.ec.europa.eu Tel.: +(39) 0332 78-9519 Fax: +(39) 0332 78-5154 https://ec.europa.eu/jrc https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/institutes/ipsc Legal Notice This publication is a Science and Policy Report by the Joint Research Centre, the European Commission’s in-house science service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policy-making process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. All images © European Union, 2015 JRC97488 EUR 27455 EN ISBN 978-92-79-51779-2 (pdf) ISBN 978-92-79-51778-5 (print) ISSN 1831-9424 (online) ISSN 1018-5593 (print) doi:10.2788/57013 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015 © European Union, 2015 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Abstract The 6th JRC ECML Crisis Management Technology Workshop on Tsunami Decision Support Systems was held in the European Crisis Management Laboratory (ECML) of the Joint Research Centre in Ispra, Italy, from 2ndto 3rd July 2015. The workshop, co-organized with DRIVER (Driving Innovation in Crisis Management for European Resilience) Consortium Partners, brought together stakeholders in the design, development and use of ICT tools for decision support. 20 participants attended the event. A good mix of regional and national service providers was represented, along with European and non-European systems providers and users. The purpose of the workshop was to show the status of the technology in this field, the specific requirements and the benefits in the use of one or another solution. During the first day participants presented their tools, while during the second they had to carry out demonstration exercises on the basis of given scenarios. In the last part of the event, they were involved in a discussion which revolved around a set of questions focused on, inter alia, strengths, weaknesses and opportunities of each tool. The main aims of the discussion were to identify both new opportunities for collaboration and for tools integration and also to “bridge the gap” between the scientific and technical level and the operational dimension. The workshop was a very good opportunity for several research and operational teams to collaboratively discuss Decision Support Systems, lessons learned, ideas for improvements and opportunities for collaboration. EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen Global Security and Crisis Management July 2015 Tsunami Decision Support Systems TDSS 2015 Outcomes of the 6th JRC ECML Crisis Management Technology Workshop on Tsunami Decision Support Systems, 2-3 July 2015 Ispra Table of Content 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 7 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 9 3 Technical arrangements ........................................................................................................................... 10 4 Presentations ........................................................................................................................................... 11 4.1 DRIVER presentation ....................................................................................................................... 11 4.2 Participants’presentations .............................................................................................................. 12 4.2.1 INGV ............................................................................................................................................. 12 4.2.2 RIMES - Thailand .......................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.3 KOERI - Turkey ............................................................................................................................. 16 4.2.4. NOA - Greece ..................................................................................................................................... 18 National Tsunami Service Providers ............................................................................................................ 19 4.2.5. SHOA – Chile ...................................................................................................................................... 19 4.2.6. NEMA – Israel ..................................................................................................................................... 21 4.2.7. SINAMOT – Costa Rica ....................................................................................................................... 23 System Providers .......................................................................................................................................... 23 4.2.8. TRIDEC Cloud – Germany ................................................................................................................... 23 4.2.9 NOAA – USA ........................................................................................................................................ 25 4. 2.10 JRC – EC ........................................................................................................................................... 26 4.2.11 Tsunami- HySEA – University of Malaga ........................................................................................... 27 5 Demonstration Cases ............................................................................................................................... 29 5.1 Working mode ................................................................................................................................. 29 5.2 RIMES Demonstration ..................................................................................................................... 32 5.2.1 Flash Report ................................................................................................................................. 33 5.2.2 SMS .............................................................................................................................................. 33 5.2.3 Report bulletin ............................................................................................................................. 34 5.3 KOERI Demonstration (Started at 13:47 UTC) ................................................................................. 42 5.4 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................... 45 5.5 NOA Demonstration (Started at 14:24 UTC) ................................................................................... 62 5.5.1 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................. 64 5.5.2 Appendix A1: TAT Messages 1 and 2 ........................................................................................... 65 3 5.5.3 Appendix B1: NOA Report with TAT ............................................................................................ 71 5.6 TRIDEC-Cloud Demonstration ......................................................................................................... 75 5.6.1 Conclusions on the TRIDEC-Cloud demonstration ...................................................................... 79 5.6.2 Appendix to TRIDEC-Cloud Demo: message created .................................................................. 80 5.6.3 Report Generation ....................................................................................................................... 81 5.7 UMA Demonstration ....................................................................................................................... 82 5.8 NOAA Demonstration ...................................................................................................................... 85 5.9 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................... 86 5.10 SHOA Demonstration ...................................................................................................................... 87 6 Discussion ................................................................................................................................................. 92 6.1 SHOA ................................................................................................................................................ 92 6.2 KOERI ............................................................................................................................................... 93 6.3 TRIDEC Cloud .................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seferihisar Belediyesi
    Seferihisar Belediyesi 1. Seferihisar .............................................................2 2. Seferihisar’ın Tarihi ..............................................4 3. Seferihisar ve Cittaslow .....................................6 4. Seferihisar’ın Tarihi Yerleri .................................8 4.1. Sığacık Kalesi ...................................................8 4.2. Teos Antik Kenti .............................................9 4.3. Lebedos Antik Kenti ................................... 10 4.4. Kasım Çelebi Medresesi ............................ 11 4.5. Beyler Köyü Su Kemeri .............................. 12 4.6. Ulamış Hamamı .......................................... 13 4.7. Çıfıt Kalesi (Myonnesos) ............................ 14 4.8. Karaköse, Karakoç ve Hamamönü ........... 15 5. Seferihisar’ın Görülmesi Gereken Yerleri ... 16 5.1. Sığacık ........................................................... 16 5.2. Ürkmez ......................................................................17 5.3. Ulamış ........................................................................18 5.4. Doğanbey .................................................... 19 5.5. Köy Pazarı .................................................... 20 5.6. Ulamış ve Doğanbey Kadın Emeği Evleri 21 5.7. Sefertası Lokantası ...................................... 21 5.8. Akarca ........................................................... 22 5.9. Sığacık Pazarı ............................................... 23 6. Seferihisar’ın Köyleri ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report
    Table of Contents A Message from the Chairman.............................................................. 1 A Message from the President .............................................................. 3 Our Impact .................................................................................... 4 What’s Unique About Sister Cities International?....................................... 5 Global Leaders Circle............................................................................... 6 2018 Activities....................................................................................... 7 Where We Are (Partnership Maps) ........................................................ 14 Membership with Sister Cities International ........................................... 18 Looking for a Sister City Partner?......................................................... 19 Membership Resources and Discounts ................................................. 20 Youth Leadership Programs ............................................................... 21 YAAS 2018 Winners & Finalists ............................................................ 23 2018 Youth Leadership Summit .......................................................... 24 Sister Cities International’s 2018 Annual Conference in Aurora, Colorado.......................................................................... 26 Annual Awards Program Winners......................................................... 27 Special Education and Virtual Learning in the United States and Palestine (SEVLUP)
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Changes of the Natura 2000 Database – March 2010 the New
    Report on changes of the Natura 2000 database – March 2010 The new version of the Natura 2000 database includes the descriptive database (cntrygr_ENG_SCI-SPA_March_2010.mdb) and the spatial data in GIS shapefile format (GR_Natura2000_v28.shp). The new version has specific changes with regard to the previous version of the database submitted to the EU (cntrygr_ENG_SCI-SPA_Aug_2009.mdb, GR_Natura2000_v27.shp). The changes concern the following: 1) addition of a new SCI (GR4130005 VRACHONISIDES KALOGEROI KAI THALASSIA ZONI) 2) addition of a new SCI – SPA (GR4220033 NISOS GYAROS KAI THALASSIA ZONI) 3) addition of 41 new SPAs 1 KOILADA ERYTHROPOTAMOU: ASVESTADES, GR1110011 KOUFOVOUNO, VRYSIKA 2 GR1110012 SAMOTHRAKI: OROS FENGARI KAI PARAKTIA ZONI 3 GR1140009 OROS FALAKRO 4 GR1150011 OROS PANGAIO KAI NOTIES YPOREIES TOU 5 THASOS (OROS YPSARIO KAI PARAKTIA ZONI) KAI GR1150012 NISIDES KOINYRA, XIRONISI 6 GR1230005 PERIOCHI ELOUS ARTZAN 7 GR1230006 PERIOCHI ANTHOFYTOU 8 GR1240008 OROS VORAS 9 GR1240009 OROS PAIKO, STENA APSALOU KAI MOGLENITSAS 10 GR1310004 ORI ORLIAKAS KAI TSOURGIAKAS 11 GR1420014 PERIOCHI ELASSONAS 12 GR1420015 DELTA PINEIOU 13 GR1430007 PERIOCHI TAMIEFTIRON PROIN LIMNIS KARLAS 14 GR1430008 OROS PILIO 15 GR2130012 EVRYTERI PERIOCHI POLIS IOANNINON 16 GR2130013 EVRYTERI PERIOCHI ATHAMANIKON OREON 17 DIAPONTIA NISIA (OTHONOI, EREIKOUSA, MATHRAKI GR2230008 KAI VRACHONISIDES) 18 GR2310016 LIMNI AMVRAKIA 19 GR2320012 OROS ERYMANTHOS 20 GR2420010 OROS KANTILI 21 ORI KENTRIKIS EVVOIAS, PARAKTIA ZONI KAI GR2420011 NISIDES 22 GR2420012
    [Show full text]
  • Nea Paralias 51 - Juli 2018 3
    Nea Paralias . Dertiende jaargang - Nummer 51 - Juli 2018 . Lees in dit nummer ondermeer : . 3 Voorwoord De voorbeschouwingen van André, onze voorzitter . 3 Uw privacy Eleftheria Paralias en de nieuwe privacywetgeving . 4 Agenda De komende activiteiten, o.a. voordracht, uitstap, kookavond, enz… . 8 Ledennieuws In de kijker: ons muzikaal lid Carl Deseyn . 10 Terugblik Nabeschouwingen over de drie laatste activiteiten . 12 Dialecten en accenten Mopje uit Kreta, in het dialect, met een verklarende uitleg . 14 Actueel Drie maanden wel en wee in Griekenland . 26 Zeg nooit… Er zijn woorden die je maar beter niet uitspreekt . Een drankje uit Corfu, het Aristoteles-menu . 27 Culinair en 3 nieuwe recepten van Johan Vroomen . Inspiratie nodig voor een cadeautje voor je schoonmoeder? Op andere . 29 Griekse humor pagina’s: Remedie tegen kaalheid, Standbeeld . 30 Reisverslag De EP-groepsreis Kreta 2016 deel 5 . Pleinen en buurten Namen van pleinen, straten en buurten hebben meestal een . 32 achtergrond, maar zoals overal weten lokale bewoners niet waarom . van Athene die namen werden gegeven of hoe ze zijn ontstaan . Over de 5.000-drachme brug, ’s werelds oudste olijfboom, . 35 Wist je dat… en andere wetenswaardigheden . Ondermeer de Griekse deelname aan het songfestival . 36 Muziekrubriek en een Kretenzische parodie die een grote hit is . 38 Bestemmingen Reistips en bezienswaardigheden . Bouboulina, de laatste ambachtelijke bladerdeegbakker, . 40 Merkwaardige Grieken . en de Dame van Ro . 43 George George en afgeleide namen zijn de populairste namen voor mannen . 44 Unieke tradities De Botides, het jaarlijkse pottenbreken op Corfu . 44 Links Onze selectie websites die we de voorbije maanden bezochten; . eveneens links naar mooie YouTube-video’s .
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Implementing Decision of 16 November 2012 Adopting A
    26.1.2013 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 24/647 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION of 16 November 2012 adopting a sixth updated list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region (notified under document C(2012) 8233) (2013/29/EU) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, (4) In the context of a dynamic adaptation of the Natura 2000 network, the lists of sites of Community importance are reviewed. An update of the list of sites Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeo­ Union, graphical region is therefore necessary. Having regard to Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and (5) On the one hand, the update of the list of sites of flora ( 1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 4(2) Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeo­ thereof, graphical region is necessary in order to include additional sites that have been proposed since 2010 by Whereas: Member States as sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region within the meaning of Article 1 of Directive 92/43/EEC. For these (1) The Mediterranean biogeographical region referred to in additional sites, the obligations resulting from Articles Article 1(c)(iii) of Directive 92/43/EEC comprises the 4(4) and 6(1) of Directive 92/43/EEC should apply as Union territories of Greece, Cyprus, in accordance with soon as possible and within six years at most from the Article 1 of Protocol No 10 of the 2003 Act of Acces­ adoption of this Decision.
    [Show full text]
  • The Izmir Model
    The Izmir Model THE IZMIR MODEL PROPOSAL FOR A DEMOCRATIC MUNICIPAL MODEL FOR IZMIR 139 The Izmir Model Proposal for a Democratic Municipal Model for Izmir 2nd BOOK THE IZMIR MODEL PROPOSAL FOR A DEMOCRATIC MUNICIPAL MODEL FOR IZMIR İlhan TEKELİ Translation BİS Organizasyon Coordination Mehmet URAL Ayşegül SABUKTAY Grafik Design and Implementatiton Emre DUYGU Administration Office THE IZMIR MEDITERRANEAN ACADEMY BRANCH OF IZMIR METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY Mehmet Ali Akman Mah. Mithatpaşa Cad. No: 1087, 35290 Konak-İzmir Phone: +90 (232) 293 46 13 Fax: +90 (232) 293 46 10 www.izmeda.org [email protected] THE STORY OF THE PREPARATION OF THE IZMIR MODEL The book Proposal for a Democratic Model for Izmir was consummated as the product of a process of collective work organised by the Izmir Metropolitan Mu- nicipality. The name given to this collective process is, for short, the “Izmir Mo- del”. The Izmir Metropolitan Municipality formed an inner team of 12, composed of experts as well as senior administrators of the municipality with the purpo- se of drawing the conceptual framework of this project. This team had its first meeting on 21 January 2017. After two meetings, this team ensured that four research projects were conducted and the findings of these research projects took definitive shape in four distinct workshops, with the aim of clarifying the basic concepts/values to be employed for the Izmir Model. Later, for the Model to be based on the data flowing from the experience/performance of the Izmir Metropolitan Municipality, the inner team organised research to be conducted by handpicked academics/researchers on 20 different topics determined by the inner research team.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Hot Water Resources and Potentials of İzmir Province
    Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2005 Antalya, Turkey, 24-29 April 2005 Distribution of Hot Water Resources and Potentials of İzmir Province Yilmazer S.*, Alacali M.** *Geyser Earth Science Coop., 35042-Bornova-İzmir, [email protected] ** Balçova Municipality, 35330-Balçova-İzmir, [email protected] Keywords: Energy, geothermal, potential 2.1 Seferihisar-Cumalı, Karakoç, Doğanbey Geothermal Systems ABSTRACT Seferihisar spas are located in the southern part of Izmir, located in the western part of Anatolia, is the third Seferihisar (Fig.3). Many hot water reresources of varried major city of Turkey. Izmir is very important because of sizes take place in this area. The highest temperatured geothermal reresources. The geothermal areas of Izmir can resource is seen in the area formed by Doğanbey-Cumalı- be listed as Balçova-Narlidere, Kariyaka-Menemen, Karakoç spas. Seferihisar, Alaçati-Çesme, Dikili-Bergama, Aliaga and Bayindir. In Balçova district heating and thermal tourism, The apparent thermal potentials of the hot water resources of Seferihisar has been calculated and the minimum in Çesme thermal tourism, in Dikili-Bergama district 0 heating and greenhouse heating is of importance in using temperature is accepted as 40 C. The considered resources geothermal energy Apparent potential of geothermal energy are, Doğanbey, Doğanbey Salt Mine, Karakoç, Cumalı, in Izmir province, considering the lowest consumption Karakoç Spas and 2 wells around, a well in Doğanbey and a temperature as 400C, is 440 000 000 kcal/h. Depending on well drilled by MTA around Cumalı Spas. The total the greatness of the geothermal areas, reservoir temperature apparent potential of the mentioned resources is: 120 000 and possible number of wellhole locations of the future, 000 kcal/h.
    [Show full text]
  • About İzmir Seferihisar Earthquake (31.10.2020 - 00:45)
    About İzmir Seferihisar Earthquake (31.10.2020 - 00:45) PRESS BULLETIN An earthquake measuring 6.6 on the Richter scale took place on 30.10.2020 Friday at 14:51 local time at the Seferihisar coast of the Aegean Sea. The closest settlement to the earthquake epicentre that took place 16.54 meters under the ground is the Seferihisar district of the İzmir province. A total of 244 aftershocks (24 of them above 4 on the Richter scale) took place in the aftermath of the earthquake. According to the immediate information received from SAKOM, 20 people have died and 1 drowned while a total of 725 people have been injured as a result of the earthquake. Search and rescue activities continue in all cities of the Aegean region and especially in İzmir and Aydın. Moreover, the Turkish Armed Forces have been carrying out search and rescue activities from air. All Ministry and Provincial Disaster and Emergency Management Centers are on alert; teams from Provincial AFAD Directorates of İstanbul, Afyon, Bursa, Sakarya, Kütahya, Eskişehir, Çanakkale, Muğla ve Balıkesir, Manisa, Konya, Denizli, Uşak and Isparta arrived in the region. A total of 3 mobile coordination trucks from Sakarya, Bursa and Afyon arrived in the region. 53 vehicles and 189 staff from UMKE and 112 Urgent Aid teams were assigned to carry out search and rescue activities in the region. According to the information received from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, there are energy cuts in a total of 115 spots in İzmir, Muğla and Aydın and service cuts in 10 different areas and teams are working in an effort to repair the brekabes in the energy services.
    [Show full text]
  • Türkiye Acil Afet İzleme Projesi TÜBİTAK MAM Proje No: 5200101 Proje Yürütücüsü: Prof. Dr. Yalçın YÜKSEL
    Türkiye Acil Afet İzleme Projesi TÜBİTAK MAM Proje No: 5200101 Proje Yürütücüsü: Prof. Dr. Yalçın YÜKSEL Araştırmacı(lar): Prof. Dr. Ahmet Cevdet Yalçıner Prof. Dr. Şükrü Ersoy Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Cihan Şahin Dr. Işıkhan Güler Doç. Dr. Mehmet Öztürk Doç. Dr. Yeşim Çelikoğlu Doç. Dr. Anıl Arı Güner Doç. Dr. Nedim Onur Aykut Araş. Gör. Gözde Güney Doğan Araş. Gör. Fulya İşlek Har. Müh. Özgür Şahin Sarı KASIM 2020 İSTANBUL ÖNSÖZ Bu çalışma 30.10.2020 Seferihisar (İzmir, Türkiye) açıklarında Doğu-Batı doğrultusunda normal atımlı faylanma sonucunda meydana gelen deprem sonrası TÜBİTAK tarafından Hızlı Destek programı dâhilinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu amaçla 6646 sayılı 19.11.2020 tarihli yazı ile TÜBİTAK MAM ile Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi arasında “Deprem Odaklı Yer Bilimleri Araştırma Alanı Saha Çalışması” kapsamında bir iş birliği protokolü imzalanmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı deprem sonrası meydana gelen tsunaminin etkilerinin saha ölçümleri yapılarak belirlenmesi ve bu mekanizmanın anlaşılmasıdır. Çalışma kısa zamanda oldukça geniş bir sahada kalabalık bir akademik personelle detaylı ölçümler yapılarak yapılmıştır. Çalışmaya destek veren TÜBİTAK Başkanlığı’na, TÜBİTAK MAM’a, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü’ne ve Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü’ne teşekkür ederiz. Çalışmaya akademik personelin yansıra bölge halkı da destekleyerek yardımcı olduğundan, özellikle raporun sonunda adları geçen gözlemcilere, yerel yönetimlere ve özel sektör temsilcilerine ayrıca teşekkür ederiz. Çalışmanın gelecekte olması muhtemel bu tip afetlere karşı
    [Show full text]
  • DX Timeline By
    DX bulletin 160 11/08/2016 By ON9CFG HF manager UBA DX WORLD team member [email protected] DX NEWS by Bouvet Island 3Y0Z “You are likely aware that three of us; Bob, K4UEE, Erling, LA6VM and Ralph, KØIR have begun work on a DXpedition to Bouvet in early 2018. We have transportation assured by Nigel Jolly, who is planning on using a larger vessel than the Braveheart to accommodate a team of 20. Erling has been working with the Norsk Polar Institute, updating our existing permit, and sees no obstacle to that process. This is a costly project, but we think doable. Here are the challenges of this DXpedition: Time: To allow for a long voyage and difficulties and delays in landing due to high seas and bad helicopter flying conditions, we need a seven week window of time to conduct this DXpedition. Expense: This is a costly project, involving a long voyage and helicopter landings. Be prepared for an individual outlay of $15,000, plus travel and lodging to our point of departure. That place is likely to be Punta Arenas, Chile or Capetown, South Africa, depending on our vessel’s schedule. Physical Hardship: The Southern Ocean can be nasty with a rough voyage resulting. Seasickness can be a major issue. There is likely to be a lot of heavy lifting, carrying and other strenuous activity. Physical fitness is important. Expect lots of maintenance work. Creature Comfort: It is crowded aboard ships with little personal space. On the island, there will be no heated sleeping quarters and quarters will be crowded.
    [Show full text]
  • Επικαιροποιηση Τησ Βασησ ∆Ε∆Ομενων Του Natura 2000 Απριλιοσ 2010
    ΕΠΙΚΑΙΡΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΒΑΣΗΣ ∆Ε∆ΟΜΕΝΩΝ ΤΟΥ NATURA 2000 ΑΠΡΙΛΙΟΣ 2010 Α. Η βάση δεδομένων επικαιροποήθηκε τον Απρίλιο 2010. Η νέα επικαιροποίηση αφορά στα ακόλουθα: 1) Προσθήκη ενός νέου ΤΚΣ (GR4130005 VRACHONISIDES KALOGEROI KAI THALASSIA ZONI) 2) Προσθήκη ενός νέου ΤΚΣ – ΖΕΠ (GR4220033 NISOS GYAROS KAI THALASSIA ZONI) 3) Προσθήκη 41 νέων ΖΕΠ 1 KOILADA ERYTHROPOTAMOU: ASVESTADES, GR1110011 KOUFOVOUNO, VRYSIKA 2 GR1110012 SAMOTHRAKI: OROS FENGARI KAI PARAKTIA ZONI 3 GR1140009 OROS FALAKRO 4 GR1150011 OROS PANGAIO KAI NOTIES YPOREIES TOU 5 THASOS (OROS YPSARIO KAI PARAKTIA ZONI) KAI GR1150012 NISIDES KOINYRA, XIRONISI 6 GR1230005 PERIOCHI ELOUS ARTZAN 7 GR1230006 PERIOCHI ANTHOFYTOU 8 GR1240008 OROS VORAS 9 GR1240009 OROS PAIKO, STENA APSALOU KAI MOGLENITSAS 10 GR1310004 ORI ORLIAKAS KAI TSOURGIAKAS 11 GR1420014 PERIOCHI ELASSONAS 12 GR1420015 DELTA PINEIOU 13 GR1430007 PERIOCHI TAMIEFTIRON PROIN LIMNIS KARLAS 14 GR1430008 OROS PILIO 15 GR2130012 EVRYTERI PERIOCHI POLIS IOANNINON 16 GR2130013 EVRYTERI PERIOCHI ATHAMANIKON OREON 17 DIAPONTIA NISIA (OTHONOI, EREIKOUSA, MATHRAKI GR2230008 KAI VRACHONISIDES) 18 GR2310016 LIMNI AMVRAKIA 19 GR2320012 OROS ERYMANTHOS 20 GR2420010 OROS KANTILI 21 ORI KENTRIKIS EVVOIAS, PARAKTIA ZONI KAI GR2420011 NISIDES 22 GR2420012 OROS OCHI, PARAKTIA ZONI KAI NISIDES 23 GR2430002 ORI AGRAFA 24 GR2450008 OROS VARDOUSIA 25 GR2450009 EVRYTERI PERIOCHI GALAXEIDIOU 26 GR2510004 ORI ARTEMISIO KAI LYRKEIO 27 GR2530006 OROS ZIREIA (KYLLINI) 28 GR2540008 NOTIA MANI 29 GR3000015 OROS YMITTOS 30 GR3000016 YGROTOPOS SCHINIA
    [Show full text]
  • Country Risk and Security Report
    Riskline / Country Report / 29 August 2021 GREECE Overall risk level High Reconsider travel Can be dangerous and may present unexpected security risks Travel is possible, but there is a potential for disruptions Overview Emergency Numbers Medical 112; 166 Upcoming Events 03 September 2021 - 04 September 2021 Moderate risk: Protest to be held in Thessaloniki on 3 September Local media indicated that protesters will rally outside the Directorate of Primary Education building in Thessaloniki from 12:30 local time (09:30 GMT) on 3 September, in protest over legislation affecting education, among other issues. 13 September 2021 - 14 September 2021 Moderate risk: COVID-19 measures to be tightened for unvaccinated individuals on 13 September Starting 13 September, only those with proof of vaccination or recovery from COVID-19 will be permitted to enter indoor cafes, restaurants, clubs and sports venues. For entry to cinemas, theaters, museums and gyms, customers without COVID-19 certificates must present a negative PCR test that was taken within 48 hours. Unvaccinated university students must take COVID-19 tests twice a week. Rapid tests will cost 10EUR. 13 September 2021 - 14 September 2021 Moderate risk: Domestic travel restrictions to be tightened for unvaccinated individuals from 13 September - Update Authorities announced that effective 13 September, all unvaccinated individuals travelling by plane, boat, bus, or train must present a rapid antigen test no older than 48 hours before departure; tests will cost EUR10 (USD11,75). Riskline / Country Report / 29 August 2021 / Greece 2 Travel Advisories Medium risk: Wildfires Anticipate major disruptions to travel and services in the Island of Evia, the Greek Southern Peloponnese region, the Central Greece Region, Athens and Crete in the near term, because of ongoing fires.
    [Show full text]