DOCSLIB.ORG

West Virginia Section 303(D) List and Supplements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
West Virginia Section 303(D) List and Supplements West Virginia Section 303(d) List and Supplements uunnamednnamed ttributaryributary ooff Elk-twoElk-two MMileile CCreekreek iinn KKanawhaanawha CCountyounty PPhotohoto bbyy PPatat CCampbellampbell The format of the 2004 Section 303(d) list is organized around the Watershed Management Framework. The fi ve hydrologic groups (A-E) of the framework provide the skeleton. Within each hydrologic group, watersheds are arranged alphabetically and impaired waters are sorted by stream code in their appropriate watershed. The information that follows each impaired stream includes the stream code, the affected water quality criteria, the affected designated use, the general cause of the impairment (where known), the impaired length (or, by default, the entire length), the planned or last possible timing of TMDL development and whether or not the stream was on the 2002 list. The cause of impairment is often unknown or uncertain at the time of listing and is so indicated on the list. The cause(s) of impairment and the contributing sources of pollution will be identifi ed in the TMDL development process. Many waters are listed, by default, for their entire length. In most cases, it is doubtful that the entire length of stream is impaired, but without further data, the exact length of impairment is unknown. Each listed stream will be revisited prior to TMDL development. The additional assessments performed in the pre-TMDL monitoring effort will better defi ne the impaired length. A West Virginia Watershed Management Framework map is provided to assist navigation within the list. A key is also provided to aid in the interpretation of presented information. Six additional supplements to the Section 303(d) List are provided. The supplements allow tracking of previously listed waters that are not on the 2004 Section 303(d) list, and identify impaired waters for which TMDLs are not needed, waters for which obsolete total aluminum TMDLs have been developed, and new waters/impairments listed in 2004. Each supplement is described below: Supplemental Table A – Previously Listed Waters – No TMDLs Developed Previously listed waters from the 2002 list that are not on the 2004 list are included in this supplement if a TMDL has not been developed. These waters have been reevaluated and found not to be impaired. Causes for revision of their impairment status include recent water quality data demonstrating an improved water quality condition, revision to the water quality criteria associated with the previous listing, documentation that the water was previously listed in error, or modifi cation of the listing methodology. Supplemental Table B – Previously Listed Waters – TMDL Developed TMDLs have been developed for many previously listed waters. Under 40 CFR 130 regulations, TMDL development allows the removal of an impaired water from the Section 303(d) List. In the suggested format for the Integrated Report, such waters are to be classifi ed in Category 4a and clearly distinguished from Category 5 and the Section 303(d) List. Waters included in Category 4a have TMDLs developed, but water quality improvements are not yet complete or documented. Supplemental Table C – TMDL Developed – Below Listing Criteria The goal of every TMDL is to bring the impaired water back to the point where it meets its designated uses and associated water quality criteria. Waters in this supplement have had TMDLs developed and recent water quality information indicates that the listing criteria are no longer being exceeded. In the Integrated Report, the waters of Supplement C may be included in Category 1 (meeting all uses) provided that impairments for other uses/pollutants are not evidenced. Supplemental Table D – Impaired Waters – TMDLs not Required Under 40 CFR 130 regulations, TMDL development is not needed for impaired waters if other control mechanisms are in place which are reasonably expected to achieve water quality standards, or if the impairment is not caused by a pollutant. In the suggested format for the Integrated Report, such waters are to be classifi ed in Categories 4b and 4c, respectively. The waters residing in Category 4c are dewatered as a result of historic and present day deep mining activities. Supplemental Table E – Total Aluminum TMDLs This supplement identifi es waters for which TMDLs have been developed pursuant to the previously applicable total aluminum water quality criterion. EPA’s approval of revised aluminum criteria, as described on Page 10 of the report, makes the subject TMDLs obsolete. Supplemental Table F – New Listings for 2004 This supplement simply identifi es the newly identifi ed waters and impairments associated with the West Virginia 2004 Section 303(d) List. The waters and impairment shown on Supplemental Table F are also include on the Section 303(d) List and are classifi ed in Category 5 of the Integrated Report format. Watershed Management Framework Groupings with TMDL Finalization Target Dates WV 2004 Section 303(d) List Key List Format Impaired waters are first organized by their hydrologic grouping pursuant to the West Virginia Watershed Management Framework (i.e. Hydrologic Group A waters are shown first, followed by Hydrologic Group B, etc.) Within each hydrologic group, major watersheds are displayed alphabetically (e.g. within Hydrologic Group B, the Coal watershed is displayed first, followed by the Elk , followed by the Lower Kanawha, and so on.) Within each major watershed, impaired waters are arranged by their stream code. The following table displays the format of the West Virginia 2004 Section 303(d) List and contains excerpts designed to display various intricacies. Stream Name Stream Code Criteria Affected Cause Impaired Reach Description Projected 2002 Length TMDL List? (mi) Year Hydrologic Group B Coal Watershed – HUC # 05050009 Big Coal River WVKC Fecal Coliform Unknown 60.5 Entire Length 2005 Yes Little Coal River WVKC-10 Fecal Coliform Unknown 32.0 Entire Length 2005 Yes Spruce Fork WVKC-10-T Aluminum (dis) Unknown 11.4 Mouth – RM 11.4 2005 No Fecal Coliform Unknown 18.1 Mouth – RM 18.1 2005 No Hewitt Creek WVKC-10-T-9 Aluminum (dis) Unknown 6.0 Entire Length 2005 No Fecal Coliform Unknown 6.0 Entire Length 2005 No Iron Unknown 6.0 Entire Length 2005 No Craddock Fork WVKC-10-T-9-C Fecal Coliform Unknown 2.5 Entire Length 2005 No Sycamore Branch WVKC-10-T-9-C-2 Fecal Coliform Unknown 0.8 Mouth – RM 0.8 2005 No West Virginia’s streams are coded under an alphanumeric system. Major rivers have been assigned an alphabetical code that symbolizes their name. For example, the code for the Coal River is “WVKC” which symbolizes West Virginia- Kanawha-Coal. Adding a numerical suffix to the major river code codifies tributaries to the mainstems of the major rivers. Suffixes are applied in ascending order from mouth to headwaters. Tributaries of tributaries are codified by alternately adding numerical and alphabetical suffixes, always in ascending order from mouth to headwaters. In the example table, the Little Coal River (WVKC-10) is the tenth tributary of the Coal River (WVKC) and Spruce Fork (WVKC-10-T) is the twentieth tributary of the Little Coal River. Hewitt Creek (WVKC-10-T-9) is the ninth tributary of Spruce Fork. Craddock Fork (WVKC-10-T-9-C) is the third tributary of Hewitt Creek, and Sycamore Branch (WVKC- 10-T-9-C-2) is the second tributary of Craddock Fork. The “Criteria Affected” column identifies the numeric or narrative water quality criterion that is not attained in the impaired water. On the list, a separate line is provided for each affected criterion (reference above listings for Spruce Fork or Hewitt Creek). The “Cause” column identifies the general cause(s) of the impairment. In most instances, the actual cause of impairment is not known at the time of listing. For all waters and impairments, the impaired length is provided, as well as the impaired reach description, in as much detail as possible. If the exact length of impairment is unknown, the entire length of the stream is indicated by default. Causes of impairment and impaired reach descriptions will be confirmed in the TMDL development process. The “Projected TMDL Year” column indicates the latest year in which the WVDEP plans to develop a TMDL for the impairment. The last column of the list provides information as to whether or not the stream appeared on the West Virginia 2002 Section 303(d) List or is a new listing. Projected TMDL Completion Years Hydrologic Group A 2004, 2009, 2014 Hydrologic Group B 2005, 2010, 2015 Hydrologic Group C 2006, 2011, 2016 Hydrologic Group D 2007, 2012, 2017 Hydrologic Group E 2008, 2013, 2018 WV 2004 Section 303(d) List Key Designated Uses The affected designated uses associated with each listing are not displayed in the tabular format. Instead, the following table and discussion provides information regarding the affected designated use(s) for all criteria exceedances that resulted in the listing of impaired waters. Affected Designated Use Criterion Contact Public Water Aquatic Life All Other uses Recreation Supply Aluminum, dissolved X Chromium, hexavalent X CNA-Biological X Dioxin (2,3,7,8 – TCDD) X X X Fecal Coliform / Bacteria X X Iron X X Lead, dissolved X Manganese X pH X X X X Selenium X X Zinc X Both the aquatic life and public water supply uses are affected in most waters listed as impaired relative to iron because the numeric criterion for aquatic life in warmwater fisheries (1.5 mg/l) is identical to the criterion for the public water supply use. The aquatic life criterion for iron in troutwaters (0.5 mg/l) is more stringent than the criterion for the public water supply use. Three waters are listed solely due to the exceedance of the troutwater iron criterion - Snowy Creek (WVMY-2), Peters Creek (WVKG-13) and Right Fork of Middle Fork (WVMTM-11).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Program Overview
    WWeett WWaaddeerrss aanndd BBeeyyoonndd TThhee CCoonnddiittiioonn ooff OOuurr SSttaattee’’ss WWaatteerrss AA CCiittiizzeenn’’ss PPeerrssppeeccttiivvee 1 WV Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water and Waste Management, Nonpoint Section 601 57th Street, SE Charleston, WV 25304 The document was prepared by Tim Craddock, WV DEP’s Citizens’ Monitoring Coordinator and is available electronically in Portable Document Format (PDF). To request your copy send e-mail to Tim Craddock at: [email protected]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Color photographs provided by: Alana Hartman, DEP’s Potomac Basin Coordinator; Abby Chappel, WV River Network; Sherry Evasic, Blue Heron Environmental Network; Neil Gillies, Cacapon Institute; Suzanne Hubbard, The Mountain Institute; Renee Cain, Lower West Fork Watershed Association; Martin Christ, Friends of Deckers Creek; Bobby Bonnett, Heizer-Manila Watershed Organization; Diana Green, Davis Creek Watershed Association; James Grey, Morris Creek Watershed Association; Larry Orr, Kanawha Valley Chapter of Trout Unlimited; Valerie Wilson, Science Teacher, Oak Hill Catholic Center; Brad Durst, WV Conservation Agency and Curtis Canada, Upper Guyandotte Watershed Association. WV Save Our Streams would like to recognize all the volunteer monitors, not only those directly associated with the program, but any others who have given their time and energy in an effort to protect our state’s streams and rivers. WV Save Our Streams would also like to recognize all of the agency and other partners who have provided assistance of any kind, to help guide volunteers through the myriad of processes involved with water quality issues. “Perception is not acquired by formal education, nor is it reserved for persons learned in the arts or sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Log of the Geology of Frederick County, Virginia W
    Vol. 17 MAY, 1971 No. 2 ROAD LOG OF THE GEOLOGY OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA W. E. Nunan The following road log is a guide to geologic The user of this road log should keep in mind features along or near main roads in Frederick that automobile odometers vary in accuracy. Dis- County, Virginia. Distances and cumulative mile- tances between stops and road intersections ages between places where interesting and repre- should be checked frequently, especially at junc- sentative-lithologies, formational contacts, struc- tions or stream crossings immediately preceding tural features, fossils, and geomorphic features stops. The Frederick County road map of the occur are noted. At least one exposure for nearly Virginia Department of Highways, and the U. S. each formation is included in the log. Brief dis- Geological Survey 7.5-minute topographic maps cussions of the geological features observable at are recommended for use with this road log. the various stops is included in the text. Topographic maps covering Frederick County include Boyce, Capon Bridge, Capon Springs, A comprehensive report of the geology of the Glengary, Gore, Hayfield, Inwood, Middletown, Mountain Falls, Ridge, Stephens City, Stephen- County is presented in "Geology and Mineral Re- son, Wardensville, White Hall, and Winchester. sources of Frederick County" by Charles Butts The route of the road log (Figure 1) shows U. S. and R. S. Edmundson, Bulletin 80 of the Virginia and State Highways and those State Roads trav- Division of Mineral Resources. The publication eled or needed for reference at intersections. has a 1:62,500 scale geologic map in color, which Pertinent place names, streams, and railroad is available from the Division for $4.00 plus sales crossings are indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Intangible Values of Natural Streams, Part I Digital Object Identifier
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge KWRRI Research Reports Kentucky Water Resources Research Institute 6-1971 Measuring the Intangible Values of Natural Streams, Part I Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/kwrri.rr.40 John A. Dearinger University of Kentucky George M. Woolwine University of Kentucky Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits oy u. Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kwrri_reports Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Repository Citation Dearinger, John A. and Woolwine, George M., "Measuring the Intangible Values of Natural Streams, Part I" (1971). KWRRI Research Reports. 155. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kwrri_reports/155 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Kentucky Water Resources Research Institute at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in KWRRI Research Reports by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Research Report Number 40 MEASURING THE INTANGIBLE VALUES OF NATURAL STREAMS, PART I Application of the Uniqueness Concept By John A. Dearinger Principal Investigator and George M. Woolwine Research Assistant University of Kentucky Water Resources Institute Lexington, Kentucky Project Number B-015-KY Agreement Number 14-31-0001-3086 July 1969 - June 1971 June 1971 The work upon which this report is based was supported by funds provided by the United States Department of the Interior, Office of Water Resources Research, as authorized under the Water Resources Research Act of 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • White Hall DRAFT
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OPEN-FILE REPORT U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF 2010-1265 SEA LEVEL SEA CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS WHITE HALL Qa QUATERNARY Alluvium (Holocene and Pleistocene?)—Clay, silt, and lesser sand with angular to QUADRANGLE 1000 Qa 1000 2000 18 FEET W. VA. 70 48 subrounded clasts, derived from local bedrock. Pebble-size (4–64 mm) fragments of 20 27 23 67 Unconformity sandstone, siltstone, quartzite and weathered shale are scattered throughout the deposits. W.VA. SM VA. 83 Dm 35 62 35 Winchester 21 34 In area underlain by the Martinsburg Formation, consists of light-olive-gray, yellowish- 17 72 57 78 B 62 \ 72 61 t TERTIARY ? gray, and pale-yellowish-orange, well-bedded to crudely bedded, planar-bedded clayey 27 84 _O 73 VIRGINIA 25 silt, with weathered shale fragments as much as an inch long. Thickness as much as 40 ft 75 25 Unconformity 30 Qa DSls 61 ANTICLINORIUM 30 ZONE 31 Terrace deposits (Tertiary?)—Rounded to subrounded, highly weathered cobbles, sand, MAP LOCATION Dm b t PERMIAN ? silt, and clay exposed along State Route 681 near the confluence of Isaacs Creek and Back PROVINCE Z_ Swbm Strasburg 70 30 FAULT Skr Creek 73 70 FORD St SD Dh Om SYNCLINORIUM 33 22 60 68 Breccia (Permian?)—Brecciated massive dolomite or dolomitized limestone; may be 42 Df b 28 82 Df silicified in places and contain black stringers or staining (Fe-Mn oxide?). Exposures Ojo Dfu 25 36 83 Df 29 CREEK occur in fields east of Frog Hollow and along the axis of the Welltown syncline FAULT PROVINCE 18 Dfl Dfu MOUNTAIN 16 18 Db BAILEY 31 _O BRANCH Dmch Dmc Dmch Dm Df Hampshire Formation (Upper Devonian)—Sandstone, mudstone, siltstone, and minor 19 Dh Dh shale.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Assessment for Dam Modifications on the West Fork River Harrison County, West Virginia
    Final Environmental Assessment for Dam Modifications on the West Fork River Harrison County, West Virginia REPORT PREPARED BY: USDA NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE IN COOPERATION WITH U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE FOR THE: City of Clarksburg, WV - Clarksburg Water Board November 2010 November 2010 2 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DAM MODIFICATIONS ON THE WEST FORK RIVER Harrison County, West Virginia West Virginia Second Congressional District Responsible Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Local Sponsor: Clarksburg Water Board Cooperating Agency: US Fish and Wildlife Service Project Location: Harrison County, West Virginia For More Information: State Conservationist USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service 75 High Street, Room 301 Morgantown, WV 26505 Phone: (304) 284-7540 Fax: (304) 284-4839 or Project Leader West Virginia Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 694 Beverly Pike Elkins, WV 26241 Phone: 304 636 6586 Fax: (304) 636 7824 Environmental Assessment Designation: FINAL Abstract: This Final Environmental Assessment describes the anticipated effects of removing three obsolete run- of-the-river water supply dams and modification of a fourth dam with an aquatic life passage structure in the West Fork River. This project proposes to restore, to the greatest extent possible, the aquatic and ecological integrity of at least forty miles of the West Fork River and many more miles of adjoining tributaries. This project has the potential to restore more suitable habitat for as many as twenty-five species of freshwater mussels including two federally listed species. Liability to the dam’s owners, the Clarksburg Water Board, will be substantially reduced with implementation of the recommended alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Loads for the West Fork River Watershed, West Virginia
    Total Maximum Daily Loads for the West Fork River Watershed, West Virginia USEPA Approved July 2014 On the cover: Photos provided by WVDEP Division of Water and Waste Management West Fork River Watershed: TMDL Report CONTENTS Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Definitions................................................................................ iv Executive Summary................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 Report Format....................................................................................................................1 2.0 Introduction........................................................................................................................1 2.1 Total Maximum Daily Loads...................................................................................1 2.2 Water Quality Standards..........................................................................................4 3.0 Watershed Description and Data Inventory....................................................................5 3.1 Watershed Description.............................................................................................5 3.2 Data Inventory .........................................................................................................7 3.3 Impaired Waterbodies..............................................................................................9 4.0 Biological Impairment and Stressor Identification ......................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • USEPA Approved IR 303D Co
    2016 West Virginia Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report Prepared to fulfill the requirements of Section 303(d) and 305(b) of the federal Clean Water Act and Chapter 22, Article 11, Section 28 of the West Virginia Water Pollution Control Act for the period of July 2014 through June 2016. Prepared by the Division of Water and Waste Management Jim Justice Governor Austin Caperton Cabinet Secretary Department of Environmental Protection Scott G. Mandirola Director Division of Water and Waste Management 2016 WV Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction.............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Water Quality Standards ............................................................................................ 2 3.0 Surface Water Monitoring and Assessment ................................................................. 4 3.1 Streams and Rivers ......................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Probabilistic (Random) Sampling ...................................................................................... 5 3.3 Ambient Water Quality Monitoring Network ....................................................................... 5 3.4 Targeted Monitoring ........................................................................................................ 7 3.5 Pre-Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development Monitoring ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit C 190284
    190284 Exhibit C 190284 Exhibit C- U.S.G.S. HUC 12 Watersheds that contain and/or are immediately adjoining a U.S. EPA 303(d) water body impaired by PCBs States HUC12 Name AL,GA,TN 060200011204 Lower Nickajack Lake-Tennessee River AL 031501051003 Weiss Lake-Coosa River AL 031501060203 Big Cove Creek AL 031501060204 Turkey Town Creek AL 031501060309 H.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Mineral Resources of Frederick County
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF FREDERICK COUNTY Charles Butts and Raymond S. Edmundson BULLETIN 80 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES James L. Calver Commissioner ol Mineral Resources and State Geologisl CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGINIA | 966 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF FREDERICK COUNTY Charles Butts and "'"Raymond S. Edmundson BULLETIN 80 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES James L. Calver Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA I 966 Couuorwnlr-trr or VnctNrl Dnp,llruBxt oF PuRctrAsEs eto Suppr-v Rrcrrruorqo 1966 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Richmond, Virginia MenvrN M. Surrronr,ltNo, Director A. S. Recrrat, J*., Executiue Assistant BOARD Canr,rsr,e H. HunrBr,srNe, Williamsburg, Chairman ANonnw A. Fenr,ov, Danville, Vice-Chairman Joe P. Gn Ls, Roanoke Ar,r,eN M. HBvwenp, Newport News Cr,euor A. Ju,ssue, Jn., Charlottesville Genraxo E. Moss, Chase City Ennu,sr L. Surrrr, Grundy JorrN S. TrronxroN, Culpeper Ancrrrr L. WENnrcH, Hopewell CONTENTS Pecr Abstract 1 qrannage . 5 5 6 9 .'..'....',....'..',.',......''..'.'..'...'.'..'....,....-'.....'..'.......'.....'.'.....'..'.''..'.-.'.',.. l ? 12 o1 2r 24 26 28 Lincolnshire formation ,o r{unourgEdinburg rormatlonformation --. ... ... ....... ......... ......... .. .................. 30 Oranda formation ................
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Ohio River Tributaries Adams, Brown, and Scioto Counties
    Biological and Water Quality Study of Southern Ohio River Tributaries Adams, Brown, and Scioto Counties Mackletree Run RM 0.4, in Shawnee State Forest Ohio EPA Technical Report AMS/2016‐EAGLE‐2 Division of Surface Water Assessment and Modeling Section August 2020 (Revised April 2021) TMDL DEVELOPMENT | AMS/2016‐EAGLE‐2 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Southern Ohio River Tributaries August 2020 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Southern Ohio River Tributaries Adams, Brown, and Scioto Counties, Ohio (Sample Years 2013‐2017) August 2020 Ohio EPA Report DSW/AMS 2016‐EAGLE‐2 Prepared by: State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216‐1049 Division of Surface Water Southwest District Office 401 E. Fifth St. Dayton, Ohio 45402 Ecological Assessment Section Groveport Field Office 4675 Homer Ohio Lane Groveport, Ohio 43125 Mike DeWine, Governor State of Ohio Laurie A. Stevenson, Director Ohio Environmental Protection Agency AMS/2016‐EAGLE‐2 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Southern Ohio River Tributaries August 2020 Table of Contents List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Place Names Directory: Southern Ohio
    STATE OF OHIO Richard F. Celeste, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Joseph J. Sommer, Director DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief Information Circular No. 53 Florida Bureau ot Geo gy Ubt~ 903 w. Tennessee Street l'a\\a~' Florida 323041 ·-.. PLACE NAMES DIRECTORY: SOUTHERN OHIO compiled by Madge R. Fitak Columbus 1986 ... OD~ SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF OF THE NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ADMINISTRATION Horace R. Collins, MS, Stal.e Geologist and Division Chf,ef Robert G. Van Horn, MS, Geologist and Assistant Chf,ef Barbara J. Adams, Administrative Secretary James M. Miller, BA, Fiscal Administrator REGIONAL GEOLOGY GEOCHEMISTRY LABORATORY Dennis N. Hull, MS, Goo/,ogist and Section Head David A Stith, MS, Geologist and Section Head Michael P. Angle, MS, Goo/,ogist George Botoman, MS, Geologist C. Scott Brockman, MS, Geologist Norman F. Knapp, PhD, Chemist Richard W. Carlton, PhD, Geologist Michael R. Caudill, BS, Goo/,ogist Douglas L. Crowell, MS, Geologist LAKE ERIE Kim E. Daniels, BS, Geologist Richard M. DeLong, MS, Geologist Rene L. Fernandez, MS, Geologist Jonathan A Fuller, MS, Geologist Michael C. Hansen, MS, Geologist Donald E. Guy, Jr., MS, Goologi,st Glenn E. Larsen, MS, Geologist Carl L. Hopfinger, MS, Geology Technician Jack A Leow, BS, Geologist Dale L. Liebenthal, Research Vessel Operator Richard R. Pavey, MS, Geologist Mary Lou McGurk, Typist Katherine M. Peterson, BS, Geologist Ronald G. Rea, BS, Geologist Clark Scheerens, L. MS, Geologist TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS Gregory A Schumacher, MS, Geologist Douglas L. Shrake, BS, Geologist Ernie R. Slucher, BA, Geologist Philip J. Celnar, BFA, Cartographer and Secti.on Head Edward Mac Swinford, MS, Geologist Cartography Joel D.
    [Show full text]