DOCSLIB.ORG

White Hall DRAFT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
White Hall DRAFT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OPEN-FILE REPORT U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF 2010-1265 SEA LEVEL SEA CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS WHITE HALL Qa QUATERNARY Alluvium (Holocene and Pleistocene?)—Clay, silt, and lesser sand with angular to QUADRANGLE 1000 Qa 1000 2000 18 FEET W. VA. 70 48 subrounded clasts, derived from local bedrock. Pebble-size (4–64 mm) fragments of 20 27 23 67 Unconformity sandstone, siltstone, quartzite and weathered shale are scattered throughout the deposits. W.VA. SM VA. 83 Dm 35 62 35 Winchester 21 34 In area underlain by the Martinsburg Formation, consists of light-olive-gray, yellowish- 17 72 57 78 B 62 \ 72 61 t TERTIARY ? gray, and pale-yellowish-orange, well-bedded to crudely bedded, planar-bedded clayey 27 84 _O 73 VIRGINIA 25 silt, with weathered shale fragments as much as an inch long. Thickness as much as 40 ft 75 25 Unconformity 30 Qa DSls 61 ANTICLINORIUM 30 ZONE 31 Terrace deposits (Tertiary?)—Rounded to subrounded, highly weathered cobbles, sand, MAP LOCATION Dm b t PERMIAN ? silt, and clay exposed along State Route 681 near the confluence of Isaacs Creek and Back PROVINCE Z_ Swbm Strasburg 70 30 FAULT Skr Creek 73 70 FORD St SD Dh Om SYNCLINORIUM 33 22 60 68 Breccia (Permian?)—Brecciated massive dolomite or dolomitized limestone; may be 42 Df b 28 82 Df silicified in places and contain black stringers or staining (Fe-Mn oxide?). Exposures Ojo Dfu 25 36 83 Df 29 CREEK occur in fields east of Frog Hollow and along the axis of the Welltown syncline FAULT PROVINCE 18 Dfl Dfu MOUNTAIN 16 18 Db BAILEY 31 _O BRANCH Dmch Dmc Dmch Dm Df Hampshire Formation (Upper Devonian)—Sandstone, mudstone, siltstone, and minor 19 Dh Dh shale. Sandstone, reddish-gray to brownish-gray, medium- to thick-bedded, in part mica- _O 18 Dm Dfl Dfl SD 30 ceous and (or) arkosic, commonly crossbedded, unfossiliferous. Mudstone, maroon red, 71 18 BACK Mount Pleasant syncline 32 weathers into small lumps. Siltstone and shale, reddish-brown to gray, exhibits strong Om 70 77 76 Db RIDGE 70 80 MEADOW B 37 \ cleavage. Exposed thickness of unit as much as 850 ft. Upper part of formation not SM 16 30 MOUNTAIN 17 Db 25 33 exposed in quadrangle. Lower contact placed at base of red-beds and at top of highest Z_ Probable unconformity WEST VIRGINIAVIRGINIA 66 70 80 Qa 78 72 81 Dmc DEVONIAN Harrisonburg 65 82 81 89 gray, fossiliferous sandstone and shale of the underlying Foreknobs Formation 78 90 34 Dm VALLEY FAULT 85 60 85 Dmch 81 83 05 Dmc SM 24 35 30 MASSANUTTEN Dmc 28 Foreknobs Formation (Upper Devonian)—Interbedded sandstone, siltstone, and minor 32 Dmch 24 Dm 88 Dfu shale; locally fossiliferous. The main unit (Df) contains coherent packages of thick- Om 30 42 24 75 16 Dmch bedded to massive sandstone which occur as two ridge-forming units that are mappable BLUE Mountain 18 42 BAILEY FORD ANTICLINORIUM 22 CREEK 22 51 75 22 55 Df throughout the study area. The upper ridge-forming unit (Dfu) consists of 5 to 6 masses of NORTH 15 15 70 Dm Dm 15 MEADOW BRANCH SYNCLINORIUM 16 Back Creek fault Dm thick, resistant interbedded sandstone, siltstone, and shale that form a prominent ridge in 22 DSls 14 80 the upper part of the formation; locally two or more masses form distinct ridges. The Qa 15 54 14 Dmn Dfl Om 85 66 SM 15 24 Db Swbm lower ridge-forming unit (Dfl) consists of 3 to 4 packages of thick-bedded to massive 21 North 15 85 20 70 Dmch Skr 16 43 22 resistant interbedded sandstone, siltstone, and shale which form a prominent ridge at the Om Unconformity BACK 19 St base of the formation. The interval (Df) between the two ridge-forming units consists of 10 47 36 thin- to medium-bedded sandstone, siltstone, and shale and typically occupies the drain- _O 12 DSls 65 15 Little North Mountain age area between the two ridges; commonly not well exposed. The lower contact with the GREAT 75 Ojo 47 62 58 Brallier Formation is gradational through about 300 ft and is mapped where an abrupt Z_ 85 Swbm 21 SILURIAN increase in fossiliferous sandstone beds greater than 6 in. occurs. Thickness about 1,700 ft Little 46 ZONE 23 18 60 72 _O 20 Skr SYNCLINE 50 Brallier Formation (Upper Devonian)—Interbedded shale, siltstone, and sandstone, 20 70 67 45 Db 17 35 dark-gray to greenish-gray, weathers light brownish-gray, sparsely fossiliferous. Grain FAULT 82 17 77 St FAULT 75 size increases irregularly upward in section; sandstone beds, 2 to 6 in. thick, become more Silurian through Mississippian rocks of the Valley and ANTICLINORIUM 70 73 SM 70 52 77 Ridge Province 16 42 abundant near top of formation. Shale that is thickly laminated with scattered siltstone 69 Qa Unconformity 74 SURFACE beds up to 3 in. thick makes up the bulk of the formation. The lower contact with the FAULT _O 80 80 74 DS Devonian and Silurian rocks of Massanutten Mountain 19 Om MOUNTAIN 77 Om underlying Mahantango Formation is a disconformity above a massive sandstone unit 87 Ojo 32 50 50 (Dmc) at the top of the Mahantango. A mappable contact is placed at the top of this RIDGE Oc Upper and Middle Ordovician Martinsburg PLEASANT 26 52 70 Om 87 57 45 sandstone. Thickness approximately 1,100 ft Formation On 35 MOUNTAIN 68 63 Om 32 34 On SM Cambrian through Middle Ordovician rocks, mainly MOUNTAIN Dfl 37 _O GREAT NORTH Oc 40 Op Mahantango Formation (Middle Devonian)—Mudstone, shale, siltstone, and minor 85 35 65 Dmc carbonate Oc PIE 26 SYNCLINE 30 45 Oc sandstone. Mudstone, dark-gray to olive-gray, hackly weathering, locally very fossilifer- SM Qa 29 52 23 Neoproterozoic and Lower Cambrian rocks Oc Z_ 22 Op ORDOVICIAN ous; bedding obscure, spheroidal weathering common. Sandstone (Dmc, equivalent to Df Df 52 On of the Blue Ridge Province 11 Dm Clearville Siltstone Member of Jolley, 1983), medium-gray, fine-grained, medium- to MOUNT NORTH B' _O FAULT 75 On thick-bedded, generally massive, locally fossiliferous; occurs as two units near top of 64 70 Dmc Unconformity Figure 1. -- General geologic map of the Great Valley Province in WELLTOWN Dfu Dmch formation separated by mudstone; total thickness as much as 380 ft. Chaneysville NORTH APPLE 10 85 Or northern Virginia showing the location of the White Hall 7.5-minute 60 Op Siltstone Member (Dmch) is predominantly massive darkgray siltstone and black 70 67 35 43 Apple Pie Ridge Fault Op quadrangle, and inset map of the White Hall quadrangle showing shaded Dfu 20 mudstone occurring in the lower part of the formation, locally fossiliferous, up to 850 ft LITTLE 10 72 77 _e relief and selected structural elements. Lithotectonic units on inset map: Om Or thick, grades into calcareous shale at base. Total thickness of entire formation ranges from WELLTOWN 62 70 41 Or MS, Mississippian through Silurian rocks of Valley and Ridge Province; 22 Df B’ 15 90 35 1,600 to 1,800 ft. Lower contact gradational; placed at base of olive-gray beds above Df Oc 28 _O, Cambrian and Ordovician rocks of the Great Valley Province to the Thrust fault -- teeth on upthrown block 55 45 62 underlying Marcellus Shale 1000 2000 FEET SEA LEVEL SEA \ 1000 70 83 Os east of Little North Mountain, bounded by the North Mountain fault 67 14 Strike-slip fault -- arrows indicate relative motion 40 35 zone. Major folds in the Devonian shales, siltstones, and minor 40 On 35 Marcellus Shale and Needmore Shale, undivided (Middle and Lower Devonian)— 39 44 45 O_c Dmn sandstones are also shown. Anticline -- arrow indicates direction of plunge 90 70 88 90 Op 80 50 Black shale, silty shale, calcareous shale, and minor limestone. Thickness as much as 800 40 63 25 Db 39 34 80 CAMBRIAN ft; however, units are not well exposed in the quadrangle due to faulting and colluvial Syncline -- arrow indicates direction of plunge 12 40 _e 38 cover. Descriptions below are based upon mapping conducted in adjacent quadrangles 60 40 33 Overturned anticline 47 74 56 20 22 Marcellus Shale (Middle Devonian)—Shale, black to dark-gray, highly fissile, with Overturned syncline Dfl DSls 38 46 EXPLANATION OF MAP SYMBOLS 45 63 75 localized beds or concretions of dark-gray, argillaceous limestone or calcareous shale. 84 Forms thin, platy chips and weathers dusky yellowish-gray in exposed outcrops. Base of Db 81 Bedrock contacts -- Dashed where approximately located; dotted where concealed A Or 90 70 Alluvial contacts -- Identity and existence certain, location inferred Marcellus is marked regionally by the Tioga Metabentonite; not seen in outcrops but may 90 Swbm 45 82 be present in covered intervals. Thickness up to 700 ft _e 80 83 13 Faults -- Dashed where approximately located, dotted where concealed 40 72 APPROX. STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN 50 75 Needmore Shale (Middle and Lower Devonian)—Calcareous shale, dark-greenish-gray 45 30 49 THICKNESS 50 to olive-gray, and dark-gray fissile silty shale; locally fossiliferous. Thickness about 100 68 Thrust fault -- teeth on hanging wall FORMATION and MEMBER LITHOLOGY 25 30 Skr (in feet) EXPLANATION Period 75 Stage ft. Grades upward into the Marcellus Shale through a series of thin limestone beds. Base Fossils 25 53 ZONE b placed at top of coarse sandstone of underlying Oriskany Sandstone. Qa 75 St Strike-slip fault -- arrows indicate relative sense of movement Ojo 65 Alluvium and colluvium 0–40 ft 54 20 Regional unconformity 40 51 5 U Oriskany Sandstone, Helderberg Group, and Tonoloway Limestone, undivided 48 40 b Normal fault -- U, upthrown side; D, downthrown side SYNCLINE DSls Hampshire Formation Dmc 36 49 D (Lower Devonian and Upper Silurian)—Sandstone, limestone, and shale.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia Section 303(D) List and Supplements
    West Virginia Section 303(d) List and Supplements uunnamednnamed ttributaryributary ooff Elk-twoElk-two MMileile CCreekreek iinn KKanawhaanawha CCountyounty PPhotohoto bbyy PPatat CCampbellampbell The format of the 2004 Section 303(d) list is organized around the Watershed Management Framework. The fi ve hydrologic groups (A-E) of the framework provide the skeleton. Within each hydrologic group, watersheds are arranged alphabetically and impaired waters are sorted by stream code in their appropriate watershed. The information that follows each impaired stream includes the stream code, the affected water quality criteria, the affected designated use, the general cause of the impairment (where known), the impaired length (or, by default, the entire length), the planned or last possible timing of TMDL development and whether or not the stream was on the 2002 list. The cause of impairment is often unknown or uncertain at the time of listing and is so indicated on the list. The cause(s) of impairment and the contributing sources of pollution will be identifi ed in the TMDL development process. Many waters are listed, by default, for their entire length. In most cases, it is doubtful that the entire length of stream is impaired, but without further data, the exact length of impairment is unknown. Each listed stream will be revisited prior to TMDL development. The additional assessments performed in the pre-TMDL monitoring effort will better defi ne the impaired length. A West Virginia Watershed Management Framework map is provided to assist navigation within the list. A key is also provided to aid in the interpretation of presented information.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Overview
    WWeett WWaaddeerrss aanndd BBeeyyoonndd TThhee CCoonnddiittiioonn ooff OOuurr SSttaattee’’ss WWaatteerrss AA CCiittiizzeenn’’ss PPeerrssppeeccttiivvee 1 WV Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water and Waste Management, Nonpoint Section 601 57th Street, SE Charleston, WV 25304 The document was prepared by Tim Craddock, WV DEP’s Citizens’ Monitoring Coordinator and is available electronically in Portable Document Format (PDF). To request your copy send e-mail to Tim Craddock at: [email protected]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Color photographs provided by: Alana Hartman, DEP’s Potomac Basin Coordinator; Abby Chappel, WV River Network; Sherry Evasic, Blue Heron Environmental Network; Neil Gillies, Cacapon Institute; Suzanne Hubbard, The Mountain Institute; Renee Cain, Lower West Fork Watershed Association; Martin Christ, Friends of Deckers Creek; Bobby Bonnett, Heizer-Manila Watershed Organization; Diana Green, Davis Creek Watershed Association; James Grey, Morris Creek Watershed Association; Larry Orr, Kanawha Valley Chapter of Trout Unlimited; Valerie Wilson, Science Teacher, Oak Hill Catholic Center; Brad Durst, WV Conservation Agency and Curtis Canada, Upper Guyandotte Watershed Association. WV Save Our Streams would like to recognize all the volunteer monitors, not only those directly associated with the program, but any others who have given their time and energy in an effort to protect our state’s streams and rivers. WV Save Our Streams would also like to recognize all of the agency and other partners who have provided assistance of any kind, to help guide volunteers through the myriad of processes involved with water quality issues. “Perception is not acquired by formal education, nor is it reserved for persons learned in the arts or sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Log of the Geology of Frederick County, Virginia W
    Vol. 17 MAY, 1971 No. 2 ROAD LOG OF THE GEOLOGY OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA W. E. Nunan The following road log is a guide to geologic The user of this road log should keep in mind features along or near main roads in Frederick that automobile odometers vary in accuracy. Dis- County, Virginia. Distances and cumulative mile- tances between stops and road intersections ages between places where interesting and repre- should be checked frequently, especially at junc- sentative-lithologies, formational contacts, struc- tions or stream crossings immediately preceding tural features, fossils, and geomorphic features stops. The Frederick County road map of the occur are noted. At least one exposure for nearly Virginia Department of Highways, and the U. S. each formation is included in the log. Brief dis- Geological Survey 7.5-minute topographic maps cussions of the geological features observable at are recommended for use with this road log. the various stops is included in the text. Topographic maps covering Frederick County include Boyce, Capon Bridge, Capon Springs, A comprehensive report of the geology of the Glengary, Gore, Hayfield, Inwood, Middletown, Mountain Falls, Ridge, Stephens City, Stephen- County is presented in "Geology and Mineral Re- son, Wardensville, White Hall, and Winchester. sources of Frederick County" by Charles Butts The route of the road log (Figure 1) shows U. S. and R. S. Edmundson, Bulletin 80 of the Virginia and State Highways and those State Roads trav- Division of Mineral Resources. The publication eled or needed for reference at intersections. has a 1:62,500 scale geologic map in color, which Pertinent place names, streams, and railroad is available from the Division for $4.00 plus sales crossings are indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Intangible Values of Natural Streams, Part I Digital Object Identifier
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge KWRRI Research Reports Kentucky Water Resources Research Institute 6-1971 Measuring the Intangible Values of Natural Streams, Part I Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/kwrri.rr.40 John A. Dearinger University of Kentucky George M. Woolwine University of Kentucky Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits oy u. Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kwrri_reports Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Repository Citation Dearinger, John A. and Woolwine, George M., "Measuring the Intangible Values of Natural Streams, Part I" (1971). KWRRI Research Reports. 155. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kwrri_reports/155 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Kentucky Water Resources Research Institute at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in KWRRI Research Reports by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Research Report Number 40 MEASURING THE INTANGIBLE VALUES OF NATURAL STREAMS, PART I Application of the Uniqueness Concept By John A. Dearinger Principal Investigator and George M. Woolwine Research Assistant University of Kentucky Water Resources Institute Lexington, Kentucky Project Number B-015-KY Agreement Number 14-31-0001-3086 July 1969 - June 1971 June 1971 The work upon which this report is based was supported by funds provided by the United States Department of the Interior, Office of Water Resources Research, as authorized under the Water Resources Research Act of 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Assessment for Dam Modifications on the West Fork River Harrison County, West Virginia
    Final Environmental Assessment for Dam Modifications on the West Fork River Harrison County, West Virginia REPORT PREPARED BY: USDA NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE IN COOPERATION WITH U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE FOR THE: City of Clarksburg, WV - Clarksburg Water Board November 2010 November 2010 2 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DAM MODIFICATIONS ON THE WEST FORK RIVER Harrison County, West Virginia West Virginia Second Congressional District Responsible Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Local Sponsor: Clarksburg Water Board Cooperating Agency: US Fish and Wildlife Service Project Location: Harrison County, West Virginia For More Information: State Conservationist USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service 75 High Street, Room 301 Morgantown, WV 26505 Phone: (304) 284-7540 Fax: (304) 284-4839 or Project Leader West Virginia Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 694 Beverly Pike Elkins, WV 26241 Phone: 304 636 6586 Fax: (304) 636 7824 Environmental Assessment Designation: FINAL Abstract: This Final Environmental Assessment describes the anticipated effects of removing three obsolete run- of-the-river water supply dams and modification of a fourth dam with an aquatic life passage structure in the West Fork River. This project proposes to restore, to the greatest extent possible, the aquatic and ecological integrity of at least forty miles of the West Fork River and many more miles of adjoining tributaries. This project has the potential to restore more suitable habitat for as many as twenty-five species of freshwater mussels including two federally listed species. Liability to the dam’s owners, the Clarksburg Water Board, will be substantially reduced with implementation of the recommended alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Loads for the West Fork River Watershed, West Virginia
    Total Maximum Daily Loads for the West Fork River Watershed, West Virginia USEPA Approved July 2014 On the cover: Photos provided by WVDEP Division of Water and Waste Management West Fork River Watershed: TMDL Report CONTENTS Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Definitions................................................................................ iv Executive Summary................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 Report Format....................................................................................................................1 2.0 Introduction........................................................................................................................1 2.1 Total Maximum Daily Loads...................................................................................1 2.2 Water Quality Standards..........................................................................................4 3.0 Watershed Description and Data Inventory....................................................................5 3.1 Watershed Description.............................................................................................5 3.2 Data Inventory .........................................................................................................7 3.3 Impaired Waterbodies..............................................................................................9 4.0 Biological Impairment and Stressor Identification ......................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • USEPA Approved IR 303D Co
    2016 West Virginia Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report Prepared to fulfill the requirements of Section 303(d) and 305(b) of the federal Clean Water Act and Chapter 22, Article 11, Section 28 of the West Virginia Water Pollution Control Act for the period of July 2014 through June 2016. Prepared by the Division of Water and Waste Management Jim Justice Governor Austin Caperton Cabinet Secretary Department of Environmental Protection Scott G. Mandirola Director Division of Water and Waste Management 2016 WV Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction.............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Water Quality Standards ............................................................................................ 2 3.0 Surface Water Monitoring and Assessment ................................................................. 4 3.1 Streams and Rivers ......................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Probabilistic (Random) Sampling ...................................................................................... 5 3.3 Ambient Water Quality Monitoring Network ....................................................................... 5 3.4 Targeted Monitoring ........................................................................................................ 7 3.5 Pre-Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development Monitoring ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit C 190284
    190284 Exhibit C 190284 Exhibit C- U.S.G.S. HUC 12 Watersheds that contain and/or are immediately adjoining a U.S. EPA 303(d) water body impaired by PCBs States HUC12 Name AL,GA,TN 060200011204 Lower Nickajack Lake-Tennessee River AL 031501051003 Weiss Lake-Coosa River AL 031501060203 Big Cove Creek AL 031501060204 Turkey Town Creek AL 031501060309 H.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Mineral Resources of Frederick County
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF FREDERICK COUNTY Charles Butts and Raymond S. Edmundson BULLETIN 80 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES James L. Calver Commissioner ol Mineral Resources and State Geologisl CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGINIA | 966 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF FREDERICK COUNTY Charles Butts and "'"Raymond S. Edmundson BULLETIN 80 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES James L. Calver Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA I 966 Couuorwnlr-trr or VnctNrl Dnp,llruBxt oF PuRctrAsEs eto Suppr-v Rrcrrruorqo 1966 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Richmond, Virginia MenvrN M. Surrronr,ltNo, Director A. S. Recrrat, J*., Executiue Assistant BOARD Canr,rsr,e H. HunrBr,srNe, Williamsburg, Chairman ANonnw A. Fenr,ov, Danville, Vice-Chairman Joe P. Gn Ls, Roanoke Ar,r,eN M. HBvwenp, Newport News Cr,euor A. Ju,ssue, Jn., Charlottesville Genraxo E. Moss, Chase City Ennu,sr L. Surrrr, Grundy JorrN S. TrronxroN, Culpeper Ancrrrr L. WENnrcH, Hopewell CONTENTS Pecr Abstract 1 qrannage . 5 5 6 9 .'..'....',....'..',.',......''..'.'..'...'.'..'....,....-'.....'..'.......'.....'.'.....'..'.''..'.-.'.',.. l ? 12 o1 2r 24 26 28 Lincolnshire formation ,o r{unourgEdinburg rormatlonformation --. ... ... ....... ......... ......... .. .................. 30 Oranda formation ................
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Ohio River Tributaries Adams, Brown, and Scioto Counties
    Biological and Water Quality Study of Southern Ohio River Tributaries Adams, Brown, and Scioto Counties Mackletree Run RM 0.4, in Shawnee State Forest Ohio EPA Technical Report AMS/2016‐EAGLE‐2 Division of Surface Water Assessment and Modeling Section August 2020 (Revised April 2021) TMDL DEVELOPMENT | AMS/2016‐EAGLE‐2 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Southern Ohio River Tributaries August 2020 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Southern Ohio River Tributaries Adams, Brown, and Scioto Counties, Ohio (Sample Years 2013‐2017) August 2020 Ohio EPA Report DSW/AMS 2016‐EAGLE‐2 Prepared by: State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216‐1049 Division of Surface Water Southwest District Office 401 E. Fifth St. Dayton, Ohio 45402 Ecological Assessment Section Groveport Field Office 4675 Homer Ohio Lane Groveport, Ohio 43125 Mike DeWine, Governor State of Ohio Laurie A. Stevenson, Director Ohio Environmental Protection Agency AMS/2016‐EAGLE‐2 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Southern Ohio River Tributaries August 2020 Table of Contents List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Place Names Directory: Southern Ohio
    STATE OF OHIO Richard F. Celeste, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Joseph J. Sommer, Director DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief Information Circular No. 53 Florida Bureau ot Geo gy Ubt~ 903 w. Tennessee Street l'a\\a~' Florida 323041 ·-.. PLACE NAMES DIRECTORY: SOUTHERN OHIO compiled by Madge R. Fitak Columbus 1986 ... OD~ SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF OF THE NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ADMINISTRATION Horace R. Collins, MS, Stal.e Geologist and Division Chf,ef Robert G. Van Horn, MS, Geologist and Assistant Chf,ef Barbara J. Adams, Administrative Secretary James M. Miller, BA, Fiscal Administrator REGIONAL GEOLOGY GEOCHEMISTRY LABORATORY Dennis N. Hull, MS, Goo/,ogist and Section Head David A Stith, MS, Geologist and Section Head Michael P. Angle, MS, Goo/,ogist George Botoman, MS, Geologist C. Scott Brockman, MS, Geologist Norman F. Knapp, PhD, Chemist Richard W. Carlton, PhD, Geologist Michael R. Caudill, BS, Goo/,ogist Douglas L. Crowell, MS, Geologist LAKE ERIE Kim E. Daniels, BS, Geologist Richard M. DeLong, MS, Geologist Rene L. Fernandez, MS, Geologist Jonathan A Fuller, MS, Geologist Michael C. Hansen, MS, Geologist Donald E. Guy, Jr., MS, Goologi,st Glenn E. Larsen, MS, Geologist Carl L. Hopfinger, MS, Geology Technician Jack A Leow, BS, Geologist Dale L. Liebenthal, Research Vessel Operator Richard R. Pavey, MS, Geologist Mary Lou McGurk, Typist Katherine M. Peterson, BS, Geologist Ronald G. Rea, BS, Geologist Clark Scheerens, L. MS, Geologist TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS Gregory A Schumacher, MS, Geologist Douglas L. Shrake, BS, Geologist Ernie R. Slucher, BA, Geologist Philip J. Celnar, BFA, Cartographer and Secti.on Head Edward Mac Swinford, MS, Geologist Cartography Joel D.
    [Show full text]