Documenta Praehistorica XLVI
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA FACULTY OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY DocumentaDocumenta PraehistPraehistoricaorica XLVIXLVI Documenta Praehistorica XLVI EDITOR Mihael Budja ISSN 1408–967X (Print) ISSN 1854–2492 (Online) LJUBLJANA 2019 DOCUMENTA PRAEHISTORICA XLVI (2019) Urednika/Editors: Prof. Dr. Mihael Budja, urednik/editor, [email protected] Bojan Kambič, tehnični urednik/technical editor, [email protected] Uredniški odbor/Editorial board: Maja Andrič, Institute of Archaeology, ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana, Slovenia Mihael Budja, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Slovenia Canan Çakirlar, University of Groningen, Faculty of Arts, Netherlands Ekaterina Dolbunova, The State Hermitage Museum, The department of archaeology of Eastern Europe and Siberia, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation Ya-Mei Hou, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropolgy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Dimitrij Mlekuž Vrhovnik, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Slovenia; Institute for the protection of the cultural heritage of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia Simona Petru, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Slovenia Žiga Šmit, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of mathematics and physics, Slovenia Katherine Willis, University of Oxford, United Kingdom Andreja Žibrat Gašparič, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Slovenia To delo je ponujeno pod licenco Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Deljenje pod enakimi pogoji 4.0 Mednarodna licenca/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Založila in izdala/Published by: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete, Univerza v Ljubljani/ Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts ([email protected]; www.ff.uni-lj.si) Za založbo/For the publisher: Prof. Dr. Roman Kuhar, dekan Filozofske fakultete Naslov uredništva/Address of Editorial Board: Oddelek za arheologijo, Filozofska fakulteta, Univerza v Ljubljani, Aškerčeva 2, 1001 Ljubljana, p.p. 580, tel.: 386 12411570, fax.: 386 14231220 Spletni naslov/Website: https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/DocumentaPraehistorica Prelom/DTP: Cambio d.o.o., Ljubljana Tisk/Printed by: Birografika BORI d.o.o., Ljubljana Naklada/Circulation: 350 izvodov/copies Cena/Price: 51,50 EUR Natisnjeno s podporo Javne agencije za raziskovalno dejavnost Republike Slovenije. Funded by the Slovenian Research Agency. Documenta Prehistorica je vključena v Evropski referenčni seznam za humanistične vede (SCOPUS, ERIH PLUS in DOAJ) in sodeluje v omrežju CrossRef (http://www.crossref.org/), ki omogoča povezovanje referenc med založniki. The Documenta Praehistorica is indexed in the European Reference Index for Humanities (SCOPUS, ERIH PLUS and DOAJ). The journal participates in CrossRef (http://www.crossref.org/), the collaborative, cross-publisher reference linking service. E-izdaja. Publikacija je v digitalni obliki prosto dostopna na https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/DocumentaPraehistorica E-edition. The publication is freely available in digital form at https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/DocumentaPraehistorica 2 Gavrinis passage tomb CONTENTS Oksana Yanshina 6 Understanding the specific nature of the East Asia Neolithic transition Mark J. Hudson 30 Towards a prehistory of the Great Divergence> the Bronze Age roots of Japan’s premodern economy Hojjat Darabi, Tobias Richter, and Peder Mortensen 44 Neolithisation process in the central Zagros> Asiab and Ganj Dareh revisited Fokke Gerritsen, Rana Özbal 58 Barcın Höyük, a seventh millennium settlement in the Eastern Marmara region of Turkey Barbara Horejs 68 Long and short revolutions towards the Neolithic in western Anatolia and Aegean Nataliya A. Tsvetkova 84 The beginning of the Neolithic on the Upper Volga (Russia) Marek Nowak 102 The first vs. second stage of neolithisation in Polish territories (to say nothing of the third|) Nataliya Yu. Petrova 128 The development of Neolithic pottery technology in Eastern Jazira and the Zagros Mountains Deniz Sari, Semsettin Akyol 138 The Early Neolithic pottery of Keçiçayiri and its place in the North-western Anatolian Neolithisation process Lily Bonga 158 Early ceramic styles and technologies in the Aegean and the Balkans> retrospect and prospects Ekaterina Kashina, Nataliya Yu. Petrova 174 The Kargopol type ceramics – the first pottery of the northern part of the East European Plain| Noémi Beljak Pa∫inová, Tatiana Daráková 184 The state of Early Linear Pottery Culture research in Slovakia Hans-Christoph Strien 204 ‘Robust chronologies’ or ‘Bayesian illusion’| Some critical remarks on the use of chronological modelling Dmytro Haskevych, Eiko Endo, Dai Kunikita, and Olexandr Yanevich 216 New AMS dates from the Sub-Neolithic sites in the Southern Buh area (Ukraine) and problems in the Buh-Dnister Culture chronology 4 Petro Pesonen, Markku Oinonen 246 The chronology of Jäkärlä Ware – Bayesian interpretation of the old and new radiocarbon dates from Early and Middle Neolithic southwest Finland Dimitrij Mleku∫ Vrhovnik 268 Neolithic and Copper Age settlement dynamics in the Western Carpathian Basin and Eastern Alps Kristina Penezi≤, Marko Por≠i≤, Jelena Jovanovi≤, Petra Kathrin Urban, Ursula Wittwer-Backofen, and Sofija Stefanovi≤ 284 Quantifying prehistoric physiological stress using the TCA method> preliminary results from the Central Balkans Yaroslav V. Kuzmin 296 Obsidian provenance studies in the far eastern and northeastern regions of Russia and exchange networks in the prehistory of Northeast Asia> a review Serge Cassen, Carlos Rodríguez-Rellán, Ramon Fábregas Valcarce, Valentin Grimaud, Yvan Pailler, and Bettina Schulz Paulsson 308 Real and ideal European maritime transfers along the Atlantic coast during the Neolithic Jiying Liu, Hong Chen, and Yiming Shen 326 Use-wear experimental studies for differentiating flint tools processing bamboo from wood Laura Dietrich, Dörte Rokitta-Krumnow, and Oliver Dietrich 340 The meaning of projectile points in the Late Neolithic of the Northern Levant. A case study from the settlement of Shir, Syria Sonja Ka≠ar 352 Impressed Ware blade production of Northern Dalmatia (Eastern Adriatic, Croatia) in the context of Neolithisation Marianna A. Kulkova, Alexandr A. Vybornov, Aleksandr Yudin, Nataliya Doga, and Aleksandr Popov 376 New interdisciplinary research on Neolithic-Eneolithic sites in the Low Volga River region Arkadii Korolev, Anna Kochkina, and Dmitry Stashenkov 388 The Early Eneolithic burial ground at Ekaterinovsky Cape in the forest-steppe Volga region Monica Ma˘rga ˘rit, Ma˘d a˘lina Dimache 398 Personal adornments from the Eneolithic necropolis of Chirnogi-S¸uvit¸a Iorgulescu (Romania)> a picture of symbolism in prehistoric communities Akbar Abedi, Reza Heidari, Salah Salimi, and Nasir Eskandari 414 New Uruk finds in NW Iran> Hasanlu VIII-VII and no Kura-Araxes culture evidence in southern parts of Lake Urmia Saeid Bahramiyan 424 Probable evidence of a Middle Palaeolithic site in the northern parts of the Susiana Plain, Khuzestan, Iran 5 Documenta Praehistorica XLVI (2019) Understanding the specific nature of the East Asia Neolithic transition Oksana Yanshina Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography of Russian Academy of Sciences, Sankt Peterburg, RU [email protected] ABSTRACT – The main subject of this article is to define the specific nature of the Palaeolithic-Neoli- thic transition in East Asia. A comparative analysis of regional East Asian data was run in order to achieve this. As a result, three dissimilar models of the Neolithic transition were distinguished: Meso- Neolithic, Subneolithic, and Neolithic proper. The first and last are similar to their counterparts in the western part of Eurasia, but the Subneolithic is unique for East Asia. Regarding chronology, two stages of Neolithic transition can be clearly recognized in this region. The new Subneolithic type of hunter-gatherer cultures occurred during the first stage around the Sea of Japan. At the second stage, the transition to food production started in central and north-central China. In between, there was a cultural, spatial and temporal gap splitting up the transitional process into two isolated episodes. KEY WORDS – East Asia; Palaeolithic-Neolithic transition; Neolithic; Subneolithic; Meso-Neolithic; origin of pottery Razumevanje posebne narave prehoda v neolitik na obmo;ju Vzhodne Azije IZVLE∞EK – V ≠lanku razpravljamo o posebni naravi prehoda med paleolitikom in neolitikom na ob- mo≠ju Vzhodne Azije. Pri tem smo si pomagali s primerjalno analizo podatkov, pridobljenih na tem obmo≠ju. Kot rezultat predstavljamo tri razli≠ne modele prehoda v neolitik: mezo-neolitik, pod-neo- litik in pravi neolitik. Prvi in zadnji sta podobna procesom v zahodnem delu Evrazije, medtem ko je pod-neolitik pojav, zna≠ilen le za Vzhodno Azijo. Tukaj lahko na podlagi kronologije jasno razlo- ≠imo dve stopnji prehoda v neolitik. Sprva se je nova oblika pod-neolitika oblikovala med lovci in nabiralci na obmo≠ju Japonskega morja. V drugi stopnji pa se za≠ne pridelava hrane na obmo≠ju osrednje in na severnem delu osrednje Kitajske. Med obema stopnjama je kulturna, prostorska in ≠asovna prekinitev, ki proces prehoda v neolitik deli na dva lo≠ena pojava. KLJU∞NE BESEDE – Vzhodna Azija; prehod paleolitik-neolitik; pod-neolitik; mezo-neolitik; izvor lon- ≠enine Introduction Recent discoveries provide increasing evidence that 2015; Budja 2006; 2016; Jordan, Zvelebil 2009; many human achievements, previously consid-ered Huyseco et al. 2009, Hommel 2012; Gibbs, Jordan to be a product of the Neolithic agrarian