Equity and Ability Grouping: a Study of Whole-School Practices and Reflections on Vocal Music Education
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Dissertations UMSL Graduate Works 4-8-2021 Equity and Ability Grouping: A Study of Whole-School Practices and Reflections on ocalV Music Education Daniel Glossenger University of Missouri-St. Louis, [email protected] Andrew Cowell University of Missouri-St. Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation Part of the Art Education Commons, Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Elementary and Middle and Secondary Education Administration Commons, and the Secondary Education Commons Recommended Citation Glossenger, Daniel and Cowell, Andrew, "Equity and Ability Grouping: A Study of Whole-School Practices and Reflections on ocalV Music Education" (2021). Dissertations. 1033. https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation/1033 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the UMSL Graduate Works at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EQUITY AND ABILITY GROUPING 1 Equity and Ability Grouping: A Study of Whole-School Practices and Reflections on Vocal Music Education Andrew Cowell M.M.Ed., Vocal Music, Kent State University, 2014 B.M.Ed., Vocal Music, University of Missouri-St. Louis, 2006 Daniel Glossenger M.A., Education, Truman State University, 2009 B.A., History, Truman State University, 2008 A Co-Authored Dissertation submitted to The Graduate School at the University of Missouri-St. Louis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Education with an emphasis in Educational Practice May 2021 Dissertation Committee Thomasina Hassler, Ph.D. Chairperson Cheryl Osby, Ph.D. Robert Good, Ph.D. EQUITY AND ABILITY GROUPING 2 Abstract This co-authored dissertation is a macro-level case study of a public high school tracking system and a micro-level autoethnography from a music educator about vocal music placement practices. The case study sought to comprehensively describe and analyze the characteristics of a tracking system in all core subjects at a single school, including the extent of differentiation of levels, placement practices, student mobility, teacher tracking, and inclusiveness by race, class, and gender. It also used network analysis software to map more than 75,000 connections among students created by their course-taking; it used this to quantitatively identify student communities, which then were analyzed for demographic trends. Paired with the case study, the autoethnography examined the assumptions and placement practices in high school vocal music and in educator preparation programs. The case study found limited student mobility, complex placement practices that differed from one subject area to another, extensive segregation in nearly all subject areas, and limited evidence for teacher tracking. It also revealed several student communities that function as segregated schools-within-a-school. The autoethnography revealed the impact of teachers as evaluator on the leveling and ability grouping practices within vocal music education and specifically highlights bias through the lens of Critical Race Theory. Recommendations for policy reform are provided. EQUITY AND ABILITY GROUPING 3 Acknowledgement We both would like to thank our advisors and the members of our dissertation committee, Dr. Thomasina Hassler, Dr. Cheryl Osby, Dr. Rob Good, and Dr. Matthew Davis. Our hearts break at the loss of Matthew, who was our counselor and a great activist for social justice. Although we miss him dearly, he will always be with us in peace, love, and struggle. —Daniel and Drew I would like to thank the advisors, professors, and mentors that have affected the success of my tenure in collegiate learning. I would like to personally thank Dr. Christopher Venesile for his encouragement during my graduate studies and fostering the growth of my research interests. I must also thank my friends, family, Steve, and my mother for helping keep me focused; your compassion and understanding allowed me to complete this work. Finally, I need to acknowledge a friend, colleague, and mentor who has shaped me both as a person and as a professional. Dr. Richard Robinson, thank you for inspiring me years ago through reading, conversations, and writing to challenge my understanding of scholarship. —Drew In addition to our committee, I would like to thank all of the educators and staff who helped me on this journey at my workplace, at the University of Missouri-St. Louis, and at Truman State University. To Dan, Deana, Barb, Nathan, Josh, and Lois, thank you for your cheerful willingness to help in any way possible, from gathering curriculum guides in basement storage rooms to creating spreadsheets and answering my questions. To Wendy, Mark, and Jeff, thank you for your wisdom and years of service to teaching about history and education. I would not be where I am today without you. I also thank my partner, Julie, who has been patient and loving as I spent countless hours away from home. Your encouragement and sacrifices made this possible. —Daniel EQUITY AND ABILITY GROUPING 4 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 7 Problems and Audience 10 Purposes and Research Questions 11 Terminology 12 2. Literature Review 15 Theoretical Framework 15 Critical Race Theory 15 Social Reproduction Theories 20 History of Grouping 23 School-wide Grouping Literature 25 Vertical Differentiation 26 Horizontal Differentiation 28 Placement Procedures 29 Electivity. 30 Mobility. 32 Selectivity. 34 Inclusiveness 35 Scope 37 Teacher Characteristics 38 Music Education Grouping Literature 39 Audition Practices: Perpetuating Elitism 39 Musical Elitism 40 Auditioning and Listening for Whiteness 37 Diversity and Inclusion in Music 43 Culturally Responsive Pedagogy (CRP) and the Music Classroom 44 Ability Grouping & Course Selection: Student Input 47 3. Methodology 50 Case Study Methodology 50 Setting and Participants 51 Data Collection 51 Data Analysis 54 Autoethnographic Methodology 60 Participant/Researcher’s Role 62 Setting 62 Limitations and Delimitations 64 Ethical Issues 65 4. Case Study Results 66 Differentiation 66 English 66 Mathematics 69 Science 71 Social Studies 73 EQUITY AND ABILITY GROUPING 5 Placement and Mobility 75 English 77 Mathematics 82 Science 87 Social Studies 90 Inclusiveness 93 English 94 Mathematics 97 Science 100 Social Studies 103 Scope and Student Communities 105 Community Detection and Traits 105 Whole School. 106 9th grade. 106 10th grade. 109 11th grade. 112 12th grade. 115 Community Interaction 117 Whole School. 118 9th grade. 120 10th grade. 121 11th grade. 122 12th grade. 123 Community Evolution 124 Teacher Traits 127 English 129 Mathematics 129 Science 130 Social Studies 131 5. Autoethnography 132 Introduction to Inquiry through Narrative Reflection 132 Narrative #1: An involuntary absence… 133 Narrative #2: A voluntary absence… 137 Narrative #3: Noticing the void… 141 Narrative #4: Filling the void… 148 Narrative #5: Preservice undergraduate self-definition… 152 Narrative #6: Professional self-definition… 158 Narrative #7: Black music and popular culture… 163 6. Conclusions 168 Summary 169 Findings 171 Differentiation 171 Placement and Mobility 173 EQUITY AND ABILITY GROUPING 6 Inclusiveness 175 Scope and Student Communities 178 Teacher Traits 180 Vocal Music 181 Recommendations 183 Limitations 188 Future Research 191 References 193 Tables 215 Figures 259 Appendices 290 EQUITY AND ABILITY GROUPING 7 Chapter One Introduction Both of the researchers for this study believe it is important to understand the context of our work. While we have some important differences, we share the privilege of Whiteness, and we enter this phase of our work after years of study about effecting social justice. Daniel was drawn to this work by more than a decade in the classroom watching the system produce the same results, year in and year out, for the same kinds of students. Over and over again the schools where he worked lamented that Black and Brown children were simply not enrolling in advanced classes, all the while keeping gatekeepers in power and systems in place to maintain the status quo. He himself was part of that very gatekeeping, recommending students for certain classes but not others, and he admits to being complicit in the hoarding of educational opportunity. This dissertation is not enough to amend the harms done by decades of tracking practices, but he holds in his heart that one who moves mountains does so by carrying away a stone at a time. For Andrew, this work grew out of his own need for community and belonging within the music classroom. As a high school and collegiate music student navigating his own membership in a marginalized community, he not only found refuge but a sense of community in choral ensembles. Now as a choral music educator himself, he has noticed that the ensembles he directs and the music classrooms he teaches do not truly represent the diverse communities that he serves. Since the music classroom, specifically the high school ensemble setting, relies heavily upon the evaluative practices and consequently the ability grouping assignments by its director, he believes that reflecting on his tenure as a EQUITY AND ABILITY GROUPING 8 vocal music educator may reveal insight into systems that limit the participation of Black, Indigenous people of color. The goal of this dissertation is for him to contemplate his own experiences not only as a means of self-growth but to embolden other White