Volume 26, No. 4 Southeastern Conifer Quarterly December 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Volume 26, No. 4 Southeastern Conifer Quarterly December 2019 S. Horn Volume 26, no. 4 Southeastern Conifer Quarterly December 2019 American Conifer Society Southeast Region Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia From the Southeast Region President We have just finished a successful SER meeting in Gloucester VA. It was a great weekend to meet up with old friends and meet new ones. The weather could not have been any better. A big thank you to Brent Heath and Wayne Galloway for their work to make it great: Brent for offering to host the 2019 meeting in Gloucester and for suggesting venues; Wayne for lining up the vendors and tour gardens. Friday night’s dinner at Brent and Becky’s house was one of the best dinners and locations we have ever had for a meeting! Special thanks, also, to all of our plant donors who made it possible for everyone to bring a special plant home from the meeting, and a big shout out to Valerie and Bill from Piccadilly farm and Nursery for bringing a conifer for everyone who attended the meeting. Currently, we are experiencing our first “Polar Vortex” of the year - about 20 degrees below normal! As soon as it warms up, I plan to head back out to clean up the gardens and do some pruning. I also like to mulch and plant in November and December, since it gives the plants a few extra months to set roots. If you don’t get everything planted before the real winter weather hits, hold potted plants in a protected area since potted plants are affected much more by colder temps than those in the ground. We are planning a rendezvous in Columbia SC for March 21st (see page 6), and we’ve just lined up another one for August 8th in Boone, NC. We’d like to schedule a few more one-day events for 2020. Rendezvous just require a few gardens to visit and an organized lunch. People can pick their own hotel if they’re staying over, or just drive in and out the same day. Please let us know if you are interested in organizing a rendezvous, yourself. To get the best attendance it is great to have as much information in the newsletter as possible, so just let us know 4 months or so before you want us to join you, and we will get the word out. Jeff Harvey, President Inside this Issue Around the Southeast Region Fall Fun in VA! A Report on the 2019 SER Annual Meeting Our Most Overlooked Conifer by Martin Stone Pages 9-10 by Wayne Galloway. Pages 2-4 Conifer Sightings in Greece by Amelia Lane Page 11 Could YOU be the 2020 SER Annual Meeting Chair? Page 4 Getting to Know Your Roots by Leanne Kenealy A Visit to the SER Reference Garden at Norfolk Botanical Pages 12-14 Garden by Beth Jimenez and Amelia Lane Thank You to Our 2019 SER Annual Meeting Donors! Conifers for Year-Round Color by Sara Freeman Reference Garden List and Map Pages 5-6 Pages 15-17 Spring Rendezvous in Historic Columbia, SC Page 7 Newsletter Wrap-Up; List of SE Officers and Staff; and a New Facebook Contest! Page 18 Save the Dates! ACS National Conference and Conifer College in Clinton, IA— June 25-27, 2020 Page 8 Page 2 Southeastern Conifer Quarterly December 2019 Around the Southeast Region Fall Fun in Virginia! A Report on the 2019 SER Conference By Wayne Galloway, SER Vice President Our Southeast Region hosted a fall meeting for 75 ACS members over a beautiful October weekend in Tidewater Virginia. Members traveled from near and far to enjoy four outstanding private gardens, three en- gaging speakers, very robust silent and live auctions, and nonstop plant intensive fellowship. The highlights included a meeting headquarters at Brent & Becky’s Bulbs in Gloucester, Virginia. What hosts the Heath’s were! Dinner Fri- day evening was at their personal residence, an idyllic spot on a Chesa- peake Bay tributary, perfect for the oyster shucking and a seafood feast. This was also the site of Brent’s self-described Conifer garden, with many selections from ACS nurseryman Bruce Appeldoorn’s stock. A gi- ant 5 or 6 foot in diameter sycamore tree welcomed us into the grounds at their home. Becky’s garden adjoins the business with an extensive array of conifers tastefully mixed with, you guessed it, bulbs and other terrific companion plants. Here, also, we enjoyed super facilities for Brent’s highly informative lecture on companion plants, and our auction activities. Brent’s huge sycamore at night. Photo by Jeff Harvey Oyster shucking on Brent and Becky Heath’s dock. Photo by Jennifer Harvey We toured two additional private gardens on Saturday. Noted gar- dener and author Pamela Harper personally escorted us through her waterfront property, sharing stories not only of the plants, but also some of the challenges posed by hurricanes and the recovery, following them. Everyone admired her plant combinations and what a sight it was to see the cyclamen and camellias blooming! Linda and Bill Pinkham also personally guided us through their sever- al acre waterfront wonderland. Now retired from a large nursery and landscape design business, they tend to the exquisite collection in their very diverse garden. Favorites there included the Picea pungens ‘Iseli Fastigiate’ in the central backyard island garden and the weeping bald cypress tunnel. We were even treated to a look at Bill’s on-site pottery Dinner at the Heaths’. Photo by Jeff Harvey (Continued on page 4) Page 3 Southeastern Conifer Quarterly December 2019 (Continued from page 2) Pamela Harper (right) welcomes visitors to her garden. Photo by Jennifer Harvey A beautiful scene in Pamela Harper’s garden. Photo by Sandy Horn A gorgeous display in the Pinkham Garden. Photo by Sandy Honr Bill Pinkham Photo by Sandy Horn (Continued on page 4) Page 4 Southeastern Conifer Quarterly December 2019 (Continued from page 3) studio. Leanne Kenealy lectures on propagation and rootstock. Carl Simmons, Horticultur- About the Author ist from the Norfolk Botani- Wayne Galloway, Vice cal Gardens, shared many President of the SER, at experiences in his presenta- the oyster feast, with tion, “The Good and the Bad the tiny shucker. at the NBG Conifer Collec- tion”. A lecture by Leanne Ke- nealy from the JC Raulston Arboretum prompted much interest and discussion on the topic of “Knowing Your Roots”, a presentation on research into the benefits of grafting onto disease, flood, and heat resistant rootstock. [See Leanne’s lecture on pages 12-14 of this newsletter.] As always, these lectures added to our enjoyment of the world of conifers. No one left empty handed, as we presented our first timers with ACS coffee mugs and plants of Thuja plicata ‘Whipcord’, as well as their pick of one of three great plants donated by Valerie and Bill Hinesley from Piccadilly Farm and Nursery for all of our attendees. A big thank you goes out to all of our plant donors who made our silent and live auctions offer an enormous range of conifers, large and small, rare and unusual. Everyone had a chance to go home with some great plants and wonderful memories from the 2019 SER meeting. Could YOU be the 2020 SER Annual Meeting Chair? A Special Request from Jeff and Jennifer Harvey Jennifer and I have worked on several regional meetings in one-day meetings/trips, the first being to Columbia, SC on the last six years or so, but we are in the final stages of re- March 21st, sponsored by Historic Columbia and Keith Mearns building our home and business after a devastating fire in (details on Page 6). A second rendezvous has just been con- 2018, and we’re tired. We need a little break. It will not be a firmed for Aug. 8, 2020, when we will visit Arborcrest in very long break since we’ve already started planning the 2022 Boone, NC - the amazing collection and garden of Ron Stan- National Conifer Conference that will be hosted by the South- ley. This is definitely one you will not want to miss. More in- east Region in Charlotte, NC. But this year, we are hoping formation will be provided, soon. someone else will take the lead for organizing the 2020 SER We hope these one-day trips will actually bring more peo- Regional Meeting. ple together since they are much less work for the organizer The responsibilities of the Chair for a regional meeting in- and less of a time commitment for people attending. If you clude negotiating with hotel and caterers; lining up speakers; are interested in arranging a tour of your garden and a gar- finding two to four gardens to tour; negotiating the bus con- den friend close to you this year, or if you have other ideas tract; and laying out the itinerary for the conference, which for a rendezvous, please contact me so we can set it up. The usually convenes on a Friday evening, with tours on Saturday. region in the past has not had many day trip meetings, and I Typically, between 70 and 125 people attend. There is also think this may be a great chance to see places that may not the auction that needs to be coordinated with the “Plant have enough densely conifer-related gardens for a Regional Wranglers” from each state, as well as setting up the auction Meeting but have enough to interest SER members for a sin- tables and making sure each plant has its bid sheet.
Recommended publications
  • Department of Planning and Zoning
    Department of Planning and Zoning Subject: Howard County Landscape Manual Updates: Recommended Street Tree List (Appendix B) and Recommended Plant List (Appendix C) - Effective July 1, 2010 To: DLD Review Staff Homebuilders Committee From: Kent Sheubrooks, Acting Chief Division of Land Development Date: July 1, 2010 Purpose: The purpose of this policy memorandum is to update the Recommended Plant Lists presently contained in the Landscape Manual. The plant lists were created for the first edition of the Manual in 1993 before information was available about invasive qualities of certain recommended plants contained in those lists (Norway Maple, Bradford Pear, etc.). Additionally, diseases and pests have made some other plants undesirable (Ash, Austrian Pine, etc.). The Howard County General Plan 2000 and subsequent environmental and community planning publications such as the Route 1 and Route 40 Manuals and the Green Neighborhood Design Guidelines have promoted the desirability of using native plants in landscape plantings. Therefore, this policy seeks to update the Recommended Plant Lists by identifying invasive plant species and disease or pest ridden plants for their removal and prohibition from further planting in Howard County and to add other available native plants which have desirable characteristics for street tree or general landscape use for inclusion on the Recommended Plant Lists. Please note that a comprehensive review of the street tree and landscape tree lists were conducted for the purpose of this update, however, only
    [Show full text]
  • Pinus Glabra Walt. Family: Pinaceae Spruce Pine
    Pinus glabra Walt. Family: Pinaceae Spruce Pine The genus Pinus is composed of about 100 species native to temperate and tropical regions of the world. Wood of pine can be separated microscopically into the white, red and yellow pine groups. The word pinus is the classical Latin name. The word glabra means glabrous or smooth, referring to the bark. Other Common Names: Amerikaanse witte pijn, black pine, bottom white pine, cedar pine, kings-tree, lowland spruce pine, pin blanc americain, pino blanco americano, poor pine, southern white pine, spruce lowland pine, spruce pine, Walter pine, white pine. Distribution: Spruce pine is native to the coastal plain from eastern South Carolina to northern Florida and west to southeastern Louisiana. The Tree: Spruce pine trees reach heights of 100 feet, with diameters of 3 feet. A record tree has been recorded at 123 feet tall, with a diameter of over 4 feet. In stands, spruce pine self prunes to a height of 60 feet. General Wood Characteristics: The sapwood of spruce pine is a yellowish white, while the heartwood is a reddish brown. The sapwood is usually wide in second growth stands. Heartwood begins to form when the tree is about 20 years old. In old, slow-growth trees, sapwood may be only 1 to 2 inches in width. The wood of spruce pine is very heavy and strong, very stiff, hard and moderately high in shock resistance. It also has a straight grain, medium texture and is difficult to work with hand tools. It ranks high in nail holding capacity, but there may be difficulty in gluing.
    [Show full text]
  • Chamaecyparis Thyoides)
    Disease Resistance and Aesthetic Evaluation of Atlantic White Cedar (Chamaecyparis thyoides) David R. Sandrock, Michael A. Dirr and Jean Williams-Woodward Horticulture and Plant Pathology - Athens, UGA Since the original cross in 1888, Leyland cypress (xCupressocyparis leylandii) has been planted worldwide. Its rapid upright growth and evergreen foliage make it a popular choice among consumers for windbreaks, hedges, screens, specimens and Christmas trees. However, Leyland cypress is susceptible to at least two fungal pathogens, Seiridium and Botryosphaeria. These pathogens cause canker development which leads to the death of branches and eventually kills the plant. This it is necessary to search for an alternative needle evergreen with similar aesthetic characteristics but greater disease resistance. A possible plant for this role is Atlantic white cedar (Chamaecyparis thyoides). My research consists of two objectives. The first is to screen Atlantic white cedar clones for resistance to Seiridium and Botryosphaeria. The second objective is to select superior taxa of Atlantic white cedar for production based on disease resistance, aesthetic characteristics, growth habits and performance in both field and nursery conditions. The disease screening experiment was initialed in the Fall of 1998. Seiridium, Botryodiplodia and Fusicoccum were isolated from infected branches of Leyland cypress and grown in pure culture. Plants for testing were vegetatively propagated during Fall, 1997. The disease resistance screening experiment consisted of 4 completely randomized blocks of 60 one- gallon plants. Each block contained 10 single-plant replications of 5 clones of Atlantic white cedar and one Leyland cypress. Plants were wounded with a wood rasp at a point on the stem measuring approximately 1 cm in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology and Morphogenesis of the Seed Cones of the Cupressaceae - Part II Cupressoideae
    1 2 Bull. CCP 4 (2): 51-78. (10.2015) A. Jagel & V.M. Dörken Morphology and morphogenesis of the seed cones of the Cupressaceae - part II Cupressoideae Summary The cone morphology of the Cupressoideae genera Calocedrus, Thuja, Thujopsis, Chamaecyparis, Fokienia, Platycladus, Microbiota, Tetraclinis, Cupressus and Juniperus are presented in young stages, at pollination time as well as at maturity. Typical cone diagrams were drawn for each genus. In contrast to the taxodiaceous Cupressaceae, in Cupressoideae outgrowths of the seed-scale do not exist; the seed scale is completely reduced to the ovules, inserted in the axil of the cone scale. The cone scale represents the bract scale and is not a bract- /seed scale complex as is often postulated. Especially within the strongly derived groups of the Cupressoideae an increased number of ovules and the appearance of more than one row of ovules occurs. The ovules in a row develop centripetally. Each row represents one of ascending accessory shoots. Within a cone the ovules develop from proximal to distal. Within the Cupressoideae a distinct tendency can be observed shifting the fertile zone in distal parts of the cone by reducing sterile elements. In some of the most derived taxa the ovules are no longer (only) inserted axillary, but (additionally) terminal at the end of the cone axis or they alternate to the terminal cone scales (Microbiota, Tetraclinis, Juniperus). Such non-axillary ovules could be regarded as derived from axillary ones (Microbiota) or they develop directly from the apical meristem and represent elements of a terminal short-shoot (Tetraclinis, Juniperus).
    [Show full text]
  • Fusarium Torreyae (Sp
    HOST RANGE AND BIOLOGY OF FUSARIUM TORREYAE (SP. NOV), CAUSAL AGENT OF CANKER DISEASE OF FLORIDA TORREYA (TORREYA TAXIFOLIA ARN.) By AARON J. TRULOCK A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2012 1 © 2012 Aaron J. Trulock 2 To my wife, for her support, patience, and dedication 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my chair, Jason Smith, and committee members, Jenny Cruse-Sanders and Patrick Minogue, for their guidance, encouragement, and boundless knowledge, which has helped me succeed in my graduate career. I would also like to thank the Forest Pathology lab for aiding and encouraging me in both my studies and research. Research is not an individual effort; it’s a team sport. Without wonderful teammates it would never happen. Finally, I would like to that the U.S. Forest Service for their financial backing, as well as, UF/IFAS College of Agriculture and Life Science for their matching funds. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ 6 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 7 ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... 8
    [Show full text]
  • Dwarf Plants Dwarf Plants Are a Very Diverse and Intriguing Group
    Dwarf Plants Dwarf plants are a very diverse and intriguing group. Prized for their versatility and adaptability, dwarf plants are especially well suited for use in rock gardens, container plantings, and where a small specimen is needed. There are dwarfs that can be used as groundcovers, in full sun to full shade, and for use in formal or informal plantings. The word “dwarf” can mean many things, from having a growth rate of 1” per year or growing to only half the size as what is considered “normal” for that species. The most accepted way to classify a plant as a dwarf is based on its rate of growth. Plants that grow anywhere from 1”-6” per year, or grow to a 1’-6’ size in 10-15 years are considered dwarfs. Dwarfs are great to use in a low maintenance landscape, because they do not require the pruning and care that larger, faster growing shrubs do. Dwarfs make great foundation plants in small areas along a home or driveway, where others shrubs would spread out and cover walkways, block driveway views, etc. There a hundreds of dwarf varieties, many of them being conifers, or needled evergreens. Broadleaf evergreens and deciduous shrubs also have varieties that are considered dwarfs. In addition to a wide range of sizes, dwarfs come in many colors, textures, and shapes. They can be tall and narrow, upright pyramidal, rounded, low- spreading, or weeping. Listed below are many of the most popular dwarf varieties. Dwarf Conifers Dwarf Conifers Botanical Name Common Name Botanical Name Common Name Chamaecyparis obtusa 'Kosteri' Kosteri Cypress
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2014/702 ON THE COVER Duck potato (Sagittaria latifolia) at Ocmulgee National Monument. Photograph by: Sarah C. Heath, SECN Botanist. Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2014/702 Sarah Corbett Heath1 Michael W. Byrne2 1USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, Georgia 31558 2USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network 135 Phoenix Road Athens, Georgia 30605 September 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • CONIFERS OFTEN USED for BONSAI in NORTH AMERICA We Have Consulted the Plant List and Some Regional Floras to Verify Correct Scientific Names
    CONIFERS OFTEN USED FOR BONSAI IN NORTH AMERICA We have consulted The Plant List and some regional floras to verify correct scientific names. For detailed information on individual conifer species, including photographs, we recommend that you go to conifers.org. Trees are evergreen unless otherwise noted. Species that are native in North America are green. COMMON NAME(s) LATIN NAME (Genus) COMMENTS Firs Abies Firs have flattened needles arranged in more or less flattened rows along opposite sides of twigs. Mature seed cones are upright, appearing somewhat like fat candles on the uppermost tree branches. When the cones are mature, they disintegrate. Firs are widespread inhabitants of cooler areas of the North Temperate Zone. They prefer cool to cold, acid, continually moist soil and high light intensity. These requirements mean that they rarely are successful long-term bonsai subjects. True Cedars Cedrus Depending on which source you consult, there are three to five species in this genus. Atlas Cedar, Cedrus atlantica, is the only species usually used for bonsai, and plants with silvery-bluish needles (‘Glauca’ or “Blue Atlas”) are favored. This species is native in the Atlas Mountains of Morocco and Algeria. False Cypresses Chamaecyparis Chamaecyparis obtusa ‘Nana’, Dwarf Hinoki Cypress, is a selection of Hinoki Cypress which is native to Japan and Taiwan. It is a common bonsai subject. Chamaecyparis thyoides, Atlantic White Cedar, is sometimes used for bonsai. In nature, it grows in acid Southeastern acidic coastal plain bogs. Sawara Cypress, C. pisifera, is a Japanese species occasionally used for bonsai. Members of this genus have flattened, scale-leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • 2ND EDITION by JOHN MASON CONTENTS Credits 4
    Growing Conifers 2ND EDITION BY JOHN MASON CONTENTS Credits 4 About The Author 5 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 6 Caring For Conifers 8 Conifer Problems 10 CHAPTER 2 PROPAGATING CONIFERS 12 Some Methods For Improving The Success Of Propagation 12 Cutting Propagation 13 Seed Propagation 14 CHAPTER 3 GROWING CONIFERS IN CONTAINERS 16 Why Grow Conifers In Containers 16 Choosing A Container 16 Some Ideas For Using Conifers In Containers 19 CHAPTER 4 CONIFER HEDGES & TOPIARY 20 Pruning Conifers 20 Shaping Conifers 21 Pruning Tools 23 CHAPTER 5 LANDSCAPING WITH CONIFERS 24 Using Conifers 24 Growing Conifers 24 Purchasing Your Conifers 25 Conifer Landscape Use Lists 26 CHAPTER 6 COMMERCIAL & OTHER USES FOR CONIFERS 30 Edible Conifers 30 Conifer Oils 30 Agroforestry And Timber 32 CHAPTER 7 DIRECTORY OF CONIFER CULTIVARS 34 Abies (Silver Or True Firs) 34 Actinostrobus 37 Agathis 37 Araucaria 38 Athrotaxus 40 Callitris 40 Cedrus (Cedar) 41 Cephalotaxus (Plum Yew) 42 Chamaecyparis 43 Cryptomeria 47 X Cupressocyparis 48 Cupressus 49 Dacrydium 51 Ginkgo (Maidenhair Tree) 51 Juniperus 52 Lagarostrobos (Syn. Dacrydium) 57 Larix (Larch Or Tamarack) 57 Metasequoia (Dawn Redwood) 59 Microbiota 59 Picea (Spruce Or Spruce Firs) 60 Pinus 62 Podocarpus 68 Pseudotsuga (False Hemlock) 69 Sciadopitys 70 Sequoia 70 Sequoiadendron (Syn Wellingtonia) 71 Taxodium (Bald Or Deciduous Cypress) 72 Taxus 73 Thuja 75 Thujopsis 76 Torrya 77 Tsuga (Hemlock) 77 APPENDIX 79 Acknowledgements 79 Certificates & Advanced Diplomas In Horticulture 79 ACS Distance Education 79 Further Reading 79 ACS Global Partners 80 > BACK TO CONTENTS PAGE CREDITS © Copyright: John Mason The information in this book is derived from a broad cross section of First published in 2011 by John Mason as an e-book resources (research, reference materials and personal experience) from the authors and editorial assistants in the academic department Text and Photos by John Mason of ACS Distance Education.
    [Show full text]
  • Task Force on Landscape Heritage and Plant Diversity Has Determined Initial Designations
    THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL TASK FORCE ON LANDSCAPE HERITAGE & PLANT DIVERSITY nd 2 EDITION APPROVED BY THE CHANCELLORS BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS COMMITTEE February, 2005 This report is the product of a more than one-year-long effort from concerned members of the University of North Carolina community to ensure that the culturally, historically, and ecologically significant trees and landscaped spaces of the Chapel Hill campus are preserved and maintained in a manner befitting their beauty and grandeur. At the time of this writing, Carolina is in the middle of the most significant building and renovation period in its history. Such a program poses many significant challenges to the survival and well-being of our cherished trees and landscapes. This report attempts to identify, promote awareness, and provide guidelines for both the protection and enhancement of the grounds of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Furthermore, this report is intended to work within the framework of two earlier documents that help guide development of the campus: the 2002 UNC Master Plan and the 1997 Report of the Chancellor’s Task Force on Intellectual Climate at UNC. We hope that members of the university community as well as outside consultants and contractors will find this information both useful and pertinent. The Taskforce on Landscape Heritage and Plant Diversity 1 This report is the product of a more than one-year-long effort from concerned members of the University of North Carolina community to ensure that the culturally, historically, and ecologically significant trees and landscaped spaces of the Chapel Hill campus are preserved and maintained in a manner befitting their beauty and grandeur.
    [Show full text]
  • Palustrine Communities Descriptions
    Classification of the Natural Communities of Massachusetts Palustrine Communities Descriptions Palustrine Communities Descriptions These are wetland natural communities in which the species composition is affected by flooding or saturated soil conditions, and the water table is at or near the surface most of the year. Note: The term “wetland” is not used in the sense of a “jurisdictional wetland,” which has a legal definition. Pitcher Plant, photo by Patricia Swain, NHESP Classification of the Natural Communities of Massachusetts Palustrine Communities Descriptions Acidic Graminoid Fen Community Code: CP2B0B1000 State Rank: S3 Concept: Mixed graminoid/herbaceous acidic peatlands with some groundwater and/or surface water flow but no calcareous seepage. Shrubs occur in clumps but are not dominant throughout. Environmental Setting: Peatlands, commonly called bogs or fens, are wetland communities on peat, which is an accumulation of incompletely decomposed organic material. Bogs and acidic fens are northern communities; Massachusetts is at the southern limit of the geographic range of acidic peatlands, meaning that climatic conditions are marginal and occurrences are patchy. Acidic Graminoid Fens are sedge- and sphagnum-dominated peatlands that are weakly minerotrophic (mineral-rich). Acidic Graminoid Fens typically have some surface water inflow and some groundwater connectivity. Inlets and outlets are usually present, and standing water is present throughout much of the growing season. Peat mats are quaking and often unstable. Vegetation Description: Species of sphagnum moss (Sphagnum spp.) are the most common plants in all acidic peatlands. As with vascular plants, the particular sphagnum species present vary depending on acidity and nutrient availability. Acidic Graminoid Fens have the most diversity of vascular plants of the acidic peatland communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Upland Pine Forest
    Page 1 of 5 Natural Plant Community Criteria Publication Version 1-October 31, 2007 This publication is referenced in the Native and High Quality Successional Forest definitions in the Leon County Code of Laws. These criteria must be used to identify and delineate Native and High Quality Successional Forests. The following are general guidelines for evaluating and delineating the natural plant community: • Reasonable scientific judgment shall be used in determining the delineated area. • Forests will be evaluated as a whole; gaps within the forest will not be excluded from the delineated area. • Percent plant cover will be determined using visual means. • Minimum area required shall include adjacent wetlands, floodplains, canopy road protection zones, and slopes. • Recent logging of forest canopy may not preclude sites from meeting the criteria. The following are specific criteria for identifying and delineating the forest types: Native Forest Upland Pine Forest –Required 5 acre minimum area (Includes Sandhill, Clayhill, & Flatwood Forests) - This community type is generally characterized by widely-spaced pines, few understory trees and shrubs, and a diverse groundcover layer. Delineation of the community is primarily based on characteristics of the groundcover layer of the community, given that this layer contains the greatest species richness, is most characteristic of the native community, and is most vulnerable to permanent degradation. The area to be delineated must have a 50 percent plant cover of any of the following indicator
    [Show full text]