Final Country Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Country Report Land Governance Assessment Framework Implementation in Ethiopia Public Disclosure Authorized Final Country Report Supported by the World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared Zerfu Hailu (PhD) Public Disclosure Authorized With Contributions from Expert Investigators January, 2016 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Extended executive summary .............................................................................................................................. 6 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 18 2. Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 19 3. The Context ................................................................................................................................................... 22 3.1 Ethiopia's location, topography and climate ........................................................................................... 22 3.2 Ethiopia's settlement pattern .................................................................................................................... 23 3.3 System of Governance and legal frameworks ......................................................................................... 23 3.3.1 Administrative structures .................................................................................................................. 23 3.3.2 Legal frameworks ............................................................................................................................. 24 3.4 Historical perspective of land Governance .............................................................................................. 25 3.5 Currently operating tenure typology........................................................................................................ 27 3.6 Land administration institutions .............................................................................................................. 34 3.7 Federal level institutions mandated to manage state owned lands ....................................................... 39 3.8 Land disputes and institutions for dispute resolution .............................................................................. 39 3.8.1. An overview of land disputes .......................................................................................................... 39 3.8.2 Institutions for dispute resolution ..................................................................................................... 41 3.9 Tax reforms Institutions for taxations ..................................................................................................... 42 3.10 Human resource development for the land sector ................................................................................. 43 3.11 Research on environment, forest and other natural resources ............................................................... 44 3.12 Current initiatives on urban and rural land administration in Ethiopia ................................................. 45 3.12.1 Land Administration and Land Use Development Project (LALUDEP) (2009/10 - 2015/16) ...... 45 3.12.2 Community-Based Integrated Natural Resources Management Project in Lake Tana Watershed (2010 - 2017) ............................................................................................................................................. 45 3.12.3 Sustainable Land Management Project (SLMP) (Phase 2, 2014 - 2018/19) .................................. 46 3.12.4 Responsible and Innovative Land Administration (REILA) Project (2011 - 2016) ....................... 47 3.12.5 Land Administration to Nurture Development (LAND) Project (2013 - 2018) ............................. 47 3.12.6 Land Investment for Transformation (LIFT) Project (2014 - 2019) .............................................. 48 3.12.7 Ethiopia’s Agriculture Sector Policy and Investment Framework (PIF) (2010 - 2020) ................. 48 3.12.8 The Ethiopian Land Research and Development Network (ETHIOLANDNET) (Long-term) ..... 49 3.13 Ethiopia's economic performance in a glance (till 2014/2015) ............................................................. 50 1 3.14 The five years plan (2015/2016 - 2019/2020) ....................................................................................... 52 4. Summary of results of Dimensions analysis .................................................................................................. 53 4.1 Panel one: Land Rights Recognition ....................................................................................................... 54 4.1.1 Recognition of a continuum of rights ............................................................................................... 55 4.1.2 Respect for and enforcement of rights .............................................................................................. 56 4.1.3 Conclusions and key recommendations ........................................................................................... 59 4.2 Panel two. Rights to forest and common lands & rural land use regulations .......................................... 60 4.2.1 Rights to forest and common lands .................................................................................................. 61 4.2.2 Effectiveness and equity of rural land use regulations ..................................................................... 65 4.2.3 Conclusions and key recommendations ........................................................................................... 69 4.3 Panel three. Urban Land Use, Planning, and Development .................................................................... 70 4.3.1. Restrictions on rights ....................................................................................................................... 71 4.3.2. Transparency of land use restrictions .............................................................................................. 72 4.3.3 Efficiency in the urban land use planning process ........................................................................... 74 4.3.4 Speed and predictability of enforcement of restricted land use ........................................................ 76 4.3.5 Tenure regularization schemes in urban areas .................................................................................. 77 4.3.6 Conclusions and key recommendations ........................................................................................... 80 4.4 Panel four. Public Land Managementt .................................................................................................... 82 4.4.1 Identification of public land and clear management ......................................................................... 83 4.4.2 Justification and time-efficiency of acquisition processes ............................................................... 84 4.4.3 Transparency and fairness of acquisition procedures ....................................................................... 85 4.4.4 Conclusions and key recommendations ........................................................................................... 87 4.5 Panel five. Transfer of large tract of land to Private investors ................................................................ 88 4.5.1: Transfer of public land to private use follows a clear, transparent, and competitive process ......... 89 4.5.2 Private Investment Strategy .............................................................................................................. 90 4.5.3 Policy implementation is effective, consistent and transparent and involves local stakeholders ..... 93 4.5.4. Contracts involving public land are public, easily accessible and with agreements monitored ...... 95 4.5.5 Conclusion and key recommendations ............................................................................................. 96 4.6 Panel six: Public Provision of Land Information: Registry and Cadastre ............................................... 98 4.6.1 Mechanisms for recognition of rights ............................................................................................... 99 4.6.2 Completeness of the land registry .................................................................................................. 101 4.6.3 Reliability ....................................................................................................................................... 104 4.6.4 Cost-effectiveness and sustainability .............................................................................................. 105 4.6.5 Fees are determined transparently to cover the cost of service provision ...................................... 106 2 4.6.6 Conclusions and key recommendations ......................................................................................... 107 4.7 Panel seven: Land Valuation and Taxation ........................................................................................... 109 4.7.1 Transparency of valuations ............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA: MENINGITIS EPIDEMIC 2001 This Final Report Is Intended for Reporting on Emergency Appeals Appeal No
    3 December, ETHIOPIA: MENINGITIS EPIDEMIC 2001 This Final Report is intended for reporting on emergency appeals Appeal No. 12/01 Launched on: March 2001 for 3 months for CHF 1,006,787 DREF Allocated: CHF 200,000 (entirely reimbursed) Beneficiaries: 1.5 million Period covered: March - October 2001; last Operations Update (no. 2) issued on 11 June 2001) “At a glance” Appeal coverage: 91% Related Appeals: 01.13/2001 - 2001 Ethiopia annual Summary/Update: This programme, launched to assist the Ethiopian Red Cross Society (ERCS) to respond to a meningitis outbreak, has achieved the intended objectives. A final payment from ECHO remains pending but is expected shortly, and this will cover the small deficit currently reflected in the attached final financial report. Operational Developments: Ethiopia lies in the African Meningitis Belt which extends from the Red Sea in the east to the Atlantic ocean in the west. It has suffered major epidemics of meningococcal meningitis, a bacteria disease of the central nervous system, in 1981 when there were 50,000 cases and nearly a thousand deaths and in 1989 when there 46,000 cases and 1,700 deaths. Between June and August in 2000, there was an outbreak in Addis Ababa with over 850 cases and 33 deaths. Major epidemics usually occur every 8 to 12 years. This epidemic started in October 2000 in Quarit Woreda in West Gojam in Amhara Region and over a period of several months spread throughout the country. It reached its peak in week 22 of the epidemic (5-11 March 2001) when 724 cases were reported although a decrease in the number of cases week on week was reversed in week 29 (23-29 April 2001) when a lower peak was reached.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Efficiency of Wheat Producers in North Shewa Zone of Amhara Region, Central Ethiopia
    Sustainable Agriculture Research; Vol. 9, No. 3; 2020 ISSN 1927-050X E-ISSN 1927-0518 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Technical Efficiency of Wheat Producers in North Shewa Zone of Amhara Region, Central Ethiopia Tadesse Getachew1, Mengistu Ketema2, Degye Goshu3, 4 & Degnet Abebaw4 1Department of Agricultural Economics, Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia 2Department of Agricultural Economics, Haramaya University, Ethiopia 3Ethiopian Economic Policy Research Institute (EEPRI), Ethiopia 4Ethiopian Economics Association (EEA), Ethiopia Correspondence: Tadesse Getachew, Department of Agricultural Economics, Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia. Tel: 251-911-777-419. E-mail: [email protected] Received: March 17, 2020 Accepted: May 20, 2020 Online Published: May 30, 2020 doi:10.5539/sar.v9n3p77 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/sar.v9n3p77 Abstract The aim of this study is to analyze technical efficiency of wheat producers and identifying the sources of inefficiency in North Shewa Zone of Amhara National Region State, Central Ethiopia. A multi-stage sampling technique was used to select sample respondent households. In the first phase, three potential wheat grower districts namely, Bassona Worrana, Siyadebrna Wayu, and Moretna Jiru were selected purposively. In the second stage, six potential kebeles (lowest administrative level), two from each of the three districts were selected. In the third phase, proportionally with population size, 374 sample households were selected using simple random sampling techniques from each of the selected kebeles. Cobb-Douglas Stochastic Frontier Production (SFP) function and inefficiency function were used to estimate the technical inefficiency level of wheat producers using a one-step maximum likelihood estimation procedure. The average productivity of wheat was found to be 32.60 quintals per hectare.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Climate Change Impacts on Crop Water Demand, Middle Awash River Basin, Case Study of Berehet Woreda
    © 2021 The Authors Water Practice & Technology Vol 16 No 3 864 doi: 10.2166/wpt.2021.033 Modeling climate change impacts on crop water demand, middle Awash River basin, case study of Berehet woreda Negash Tessema Robaa,*, Asfaw Kebede Kassab and Dame Yadeta Geletac a Water Resources and Irrigation Engineering Department, Haramaya Institute of Technology, Haramaya University, P.O. Box 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia b Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering Department, Haramaya Institute of Technology, Haramaya University, P.O. Box 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia c Natural Resources Management Department, College of Dry Land Agriculture, Samara University, P.O. Box 132, Samara, Ethiopia *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Climate change mainly affects crops via impacting evapotranspiration. This study quantifies climate change impacts on evapotranspiration, crop water requirement, and irrigation water demand. Seventeen GCMs from the MarkSim-GCM were used for RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios for future projection. A soil sample was collected from 15 points from the maize production area. Based on USDA soil textural classification, the soil is classified as silt loam (higher class), clay loam (middle class), and clay loam (lower class). The crop growing season onset and offset were determined using the Markov chain model and compared with the farmer’s indigenous experience. The main rainy season (Kiremt) starts during the 1st meteorological decade of June for baseline period and 2nd decade to 3rd decade of June for both RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 of near (2020s) and mid (2050s) future period. The offset date is in the range of 270 (base period), RCP 4.5 (278, 284), and RCP 8.5 (281, 274) DOY for baseline, near, and mid future.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Land Tenure Security of Women in Ethiopia: Evidence from the Land Investment for Transformation Program
    PROTECTING LAND TENURE SECURITY OF WOMEN IN ETHIOPIA: EVIDENCE FROM THE LAND INVESTMENT FOR TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM Workwoha Mekonen, Ziade Hailu, John Leckie, and Gladys Savolainen Land Investment for Transformation Programme (LIFT) (DAI Global) This research paper was created with funding and technical support of the Research Consortium on Women’s Land Rights, an initiative of Resource Equity. The Research Consortium on Women’s Land Rights is a community of learning and practice that works to increase the quantity and strengthen the quality of research on interventions to advance women’s land and resource rights. Among other things, the Consortium commissions new research that promotes innovations in practice and addresses gaps in evidence on what works to improve women’s land rights. Learn more about the Research Consortium on Women’s Land Rights by visiting https://consortium.resourceequity.org/ This paper assesses the effectiveness of a specific land tenure intervention to improve the lives of women, by asking new questions of available project data sets. ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to investigate threats to women’s land rights and explore the effectiveness of land certification interventions using evidence from the Land Investment for Transformation (LIFT) program in Ethiopia. More specifically, the study aims to provide evidence on the extent that LIFT contributed to women’s tenure security. The research used a mixed method approach that integrated quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative information was analyzed from the profiles of more than seven million parcels to understand how the program had incorporated gender interests into the Second Level Land Certification (SLLC) process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Socioecological Significance of Dispersed Farmland Trees in Northern Ethiopia
    Colby College Digital Commons @ Colby Honors Theses Student Research 2016 Missing the Trees for the Forest: The Socioecological Significance of Dispersed Farmland Trees in Northern Ethiopia Jacob A. Wall Colby College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses Part of the Environmental Studies Commons, Geographic Information Sciences Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Other Environmental Sciences Commons, Remote Sensing Commons, Spatial Science Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Colby College theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed or downloaded from this site for the purposes of research and scholarship. Reproduction or distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the author. Recommended Citation Wall, Jacob A., "Missing the Trees for the Forest: The Socioecological Significance of Dispersed Farmland Trees in Northern Ethiopia" (2016). Honors Theses. Paper 950. https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses/950 This Honors Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Colby. Missing the Trees for the Forest: The Socioecological Significance of Dispersed Farmland Trees in Northern Ethiopia Jacob A. Wall Environmental Studies Program Colby College Waterville, Maine May 16, 2016 A thesis submitted to the faculty of the Environmental Studies Program in partial fulfillment of the graduation requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts with honors in Environmental Studies. ________________________ _______________________ ____________________ Travis W. Reynolds, Advisor Manny Gimond, Reader Bruce Rueger, Reader i Copyright © 2016 by the Environmental Studies Program, Colby College.
    [Show full text]
  • Local History of Ethiopia Ma - Mezzo © Bernhard Lindahl (2008)
    Local History of Ethiopia Ma - Mezzo © Bernhard Lindahl (2008) ma, maa (O) why? HES37 Ma 1258'/3813' 2093 m, near Deresge 12/38 [Gz] HES37 Ma Abo (church) 1259'/3812' 2549 m 12/38 [Gz] JEH61 Maabai (plain) 12/40 [WO] HEM61 Maaga (Maago), see Mahago HEU35 Maago 2354 m 12/39 [LM WO] HEU71 Maajeraro (Ma'ajeraro) 1320'/3931' 2345 m, 13/39 [Gz] south of Mekele -- Maale language, an Omotic language spoken in the Bako-Gazer district -- Maale people, living at some distance to the north-west of the Konso HCC.. Maale (area), east of Jinka 05/36 [x] ?? Maana, east of Ankar in the north-west 12/37? [n] JEJ40 Maandita (area) 12/41 [WO] HFF31 Maaquddi, see Meakudi maar (T) honey HFC45 Maar (Amba Maar) 1401'/3706' 1151 m 14/37 [Gz] HEU62 Maara 1314'/3935' 1940 m 13/39 [Gu Gz] JEJ42 Maaru (area) 12/41 [WO] maass..: masara (O) castle, temple JEJ52 Maassarra (area) 12/41 [WO] Ma.., see also Me.. -- Mabaan (Burun), name of a small ethnic group, numbering 3,026 at one census, but about 23 only according to the 1994 census maber (Gurage) monthly Christian gathering where there is an orthodox church HET52 Maber 1312'/3838' 1996 m 13/38 [WO Gz] mabera: mabara (O) religious organization of a group of men or women JEC50 Mabera (area), cf Mebera 11/41 [WO] mabil: mebil (mäbil) (A) food, eatables -- Mabil, Mavil, name of a Mecha Oromo tribe HDR42 Mabil, see Koli, cf Mebel JEP96 Mabra 1330'/4116' 126 m, 13/41 [WO Gz] near the border of Eritrea, cf Mebera HEU91 Macalle, see Mekele JDK54 Macanis, see Makanissa HDM12 Macaniso, see Makaniso HES69 Macanna, see Makanna, and also Mekane Birhan HFF64 Macargot, see Makargot JER02 Macarra, see Makarra HES50 Macatat, see Makatat HDH78 Maccanissa, see Makanisa HDE04 Macchi, se Meki HFF02 Macden, see May Mekden (with sub-post office) macha (O) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Next Stage for Dairy Development in Ethiopia
    The NEXT STAGE IN DAIRY DEVELOPMENT FOR ETHIOPIA Dairy Value Chains, End Markets and Food Security Cooperative Agreement 663-A-00-05-00431-00 Submitted by Land O'Lakes, Inc. P.O. Box 3099 code 1250, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia November 2010 2 TABLE OF CONTENT Pages ACRONYMNS…………………………………………………………………………………. 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY …………………………………………………………………... 6 1. OVERVIEW OF THE DAIRY SUB-SECTOR STUDY………………………………….10 1.1. The Role of the Dairy Sub-Sector in the Economy of Ethiopia 1.1.1. Milk Production and its Allocation 1.1.2 Livestock and Milk in the household economy 1.2. The Challenges 1.3. A Value Chain Approach 1.4. The Tasks and the Study Team 2. DEMAND FOR MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS…………………………………….…. 15 2.1. Milk Consumption 2.1.1. Milk and Milk Product Consumption in Urban Areas 2.1.2. Milk and Milk Product Consumption in Rural Areas 2.1.3. Milk and Milk Product Consumption in Pastoral Areas 2.2. Milk Consumption Compared to Other Countries 2.3. Milk’s Role for Food Security and Household Nutrition 2.4. Consumption of Imported Milk Products by Areas and Product Categories – domestic and imported 2.5. Milk Consumption in 2020 2.5.1.. High Estimate 2.5.2. Middle of the Range Estimate 2.5.3. Low Estimate 2.6. Assessment 3. DAIRY PRODUCTION……………………………………………………………..…… 30 3.1. Current Situation 3.2. Milk Production Areas (waiting on the maps) 3.3. Production systems and Milk Sheds (see zonal data in annex 3.3.1. Commercial Production 3.3.2. Peri-Urban and Urban Production 3.3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Journalism Is Not a Crime” Violations of Media Freedom in Ethiopia WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS “Journalism Is Not a Crime” Violations of Media Freedom in Ethiopia WATCH “Journalism Is Not a Crime” Violations of Media Freedom in Ethiopia Copyright © 2015 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-32279 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org 2 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | JANUARY 2015 JANUARY 2015 978-1-6231-32279 “Journalism Is Not a Crime” Violations of Media Freedoms in Ethiopia Glossary of Abbreviations ................................................................................................... i Map of Ethiopia .................................................................................................................. ii Summary ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AMHARA REGION : Who Does What Where (3W) (As of 13 February 2013)
    AMHARA REGION : Who Does What Where (3W) (as of 13 February 2013) Tigray Tigray Interventions/Projects at Woreda Level Afar Amhara ERCS: Lay Gayint: Beneshangul Gumu / Dire Dawa Plan Int.: Addis Ababa Hareri Save the fk Save the Save the df d/k/ CARE:f k Save the Children:f Gambela Save the Oromia Children: Children:f Children: Somali FHI: Welthungerhilfe: SNNPR j j Children:l lf/k / Oxfam GB:af ACF: ACF: Save the Save the af/k af/k Save the df Save the Save the Tach Gayint: Children:f Children: Children:fj Children:l Children: l FHI:l/k MSF Holand:f/ ! kj CARE: k Save the Children:f ! FHI:lf/k Oxfam GB: a Tselemt Save the Childrenf: j Addi Dessie Zuria: WVE: Arekay dlfk Tsegede ! Beyeda Concern:î l/ Mirab ! Concern:/ Welthungerhilfe:k Save the Children: Armacho f/k Debark Save the Children:fj Kelela: Welthungerhilfe: ! / Tach Abergele CRS: ak Save the Children:fj ! Armacho ! FHI: Save the l/k Save thef Dabat Janamora Legambo: Children:dfkj Children: ! Plan Int.:d/ j WVE: Concern: GOAL: Save the Children: dlfk Sahla k/ a / f ! ! Save the ! Lay Metema North Ziquala Children:fkj Armacho Wegera ACF: Save the Children: Tenta: ! k f Gonder ! Wag WVE: Plan Int.: / Concern: Save the dlfk Himra d k/ a WVE: ! Children: f Sekota GOAL: dlf Save the Children: Concern: Save the / ! Save: f/k Chilga ! a/ j East Children:f West ! Belesa FHI:l Save the Children:/ /k ! Gonder Belesa Dehana ! CRS: Welthungerhilfe:/ Dembia Zuria ! î Save thedf Gaz GOAL: Children: Quara ! / j CARE: WVE: Gibla ! l ! Save the Children: Welthungerhilfe: k d k/ Takusa dlfj k
    [Show full text]
  • Debre Berhan University College of Social Sciences & Humanities Department of Geography and Environmental Studies
    DEBRE BERHAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES & HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND VARIABILITY ON RURAL LIVELIHOODS AND COMMUNITY RESPONSES: THE CASE OF MERHABETE WOREDA, NORTH SHEWA ZONE, AMHARA NATIONAL REGIONAL STATE, ETHIOPIA. By: Kefelegn Chernet July 2020 Debre Berhan, Ethiopia DEBRE BERHAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES & HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND VARIABILITY ON RURAL LIVELIHOODS AND COMMUNITY RESPONSES: THE CASE OF MERHABETE WOREDA, NORTH SHEWA ZONE, AMHARA NATIONAL REGIONAL STATE, ETHIOPIA. By Kefelegn Chernet A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Geography and Environmental Studies to Presented in Partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of Master of science in Environment and Sustainable Development. Advisor Dr. Arragaw Alemayehu Debre Berhan University Debre Berhan, Ethiopia July, 2020 DEBRE BERHAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES & HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES THESIS SUBMISSION FOR DEFENSE APPROVAL SHEET – I This is to certify that the thesis entitled: Impacts of climate change and variability on rural livelihoods and community responses: the case of Merhabete woreda, North shewa zone, Amhara national regional state, Ethiopia. submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science with specialization in Environment and sustainable development of the Graduate Program of the Geography and Environmental studies, College of Social Science and Humanities, Debre Berhan University and is a record of original research carried out by Kefelegn Chernet Id. No PGR 028/11, under my supervision, and no part of the thesis has been submitted for any other degree or diploma.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes of Soil Erosion in Keya Gebriel District, Ethiopia
    Indo - African Journal for Resource Management and Planning. ISSN 2347-1786. VOL 2. NO. 01. September, 15. 2014. Indo - African Journal for Resource Management and Planning (An International Peer Reviewed Research Journal) ISSN 2347-1786. VOL 2. NO. 01 September 15, 2014 Article info Received on March 10, 2014 Published on September 15, 2014 India Causes of Soil Erosion in Keya Gebriel District, Ethiopia Ayele Behaylu Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia Zubairul Islam Associate professor, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia ABSTRACT There are various factors responsible for soil erosion. The aim of this paper was to identify the different factors that cause soil erosion in Keya Gebriel District in Ethiopia. For this study, data were collected through Questionnaires, interviews of farmers, focus group discussions and field observations. A total of 270 farmers were taken as sample population for questionnaire. For interview, a total of 45 samples were taken. In six groups a total of 72 farmers were participated in the focus group discussion. Data collected through questionnaire were analyzed quantitatively using frequency distribution and percentages. The responses from focus group discussions, and interviews were compiled, summarized and interpreted qualitatively by cross checking with questionnaire’s responses. The results of the study reveal that steepness of the slope, over-plowing without fallowing the land due to scarcity of the land, land fragmentation, tenure insecurity, lack of erosion controlling practices, lack of contour plowing, over-grazing, lack of cooperation among farmers in flowing the water that drained from sloppy watersheds through their farmlands, and the shift of farming season from belg/winter to kiremit/summer due to the scarcity of belg/winter rainfall are the major causes for soil erosion in Keya Gebriel District.
    [Show full text]