DOCSLIB.ORG

Jeffrey Eli Pearson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jeffrey Eli Pearson Contextualizing the Nabataeans: A Critical Reassessment of their History and Material Culture By Jeffrey Eli Pearson A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Erich Gruen, Chair Chris Hallett Andrew Stewart Benjamin Porter Spring 2011 Abstract Contextualizing the Nabataeans: A Critical Reassessment of their History and Material Culture by Jeffrey Eli Pearson Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology University of California, Berkeley Erich Gruen, Chair The Nabataeans, best known today for the spectacular remains of their capital at Petra in southern Jordan, continue to defy easy characterization. Since they lack a surviving narrative history of their own, in approaching the Nabataeans one necessarily relies heavily upon the commentaries of outside observers, such as the Greeks, Romans, and Jews, as well as upon comparisons of Nabataean material culture with Classical and Near Eastern models. These approaches have elucidated much about this enigmatic civilization but have not always fully succeeded in locating specifically Nabataean motivations and perspectives within and behind the sources. To address this lacuna, my dissertation provides a critical re-reading and analysis of the ancient evidence, including literary, documentary, numismatic, epigraphic, art historical, and archaeological material, in order to explore the Nabataeans’ reaction to, effect upon, and engagement with, historical events and cultural movements during the period from 312 BCE, when the Nabataeans first appear in the historical record in the wake of the conquests of Alexander the Great, to the annexation of their territory by the Romans in 106 CE. I seek to properly acknowledge the ways in which the Nabataeans self-consciously shaped their own political and cultural destinies while interacting with the broader Mediterranean and Near Eastern worlds. While identification, analysis, and articulation of the Nabataean viewpoint guides the dissertation, the project also broadly challenges or qualifies several important assumptions about the Nabataean civilization. In treating the period from 312 BCE to the eastern settlement of Pompey in 63 BCE, I argue that the Nabataeans played a more important role in the Hellenistic world than has generally been acknowledged— especially for the 3rd and 2nd centuries BCE—and I articulate the nature and significance of their position vis-à-vis their neighbors and rivals, both regional and further a-field, specifically from the Nabataean point of view. This analysis makes an important contribution to current discussions of the development of Nabataean identity and culture, and it can serve as a model for viewing other under-explored Hellenistic civilizations in the Near East. Events in the ensuing period, after 63 BCE, take place under the broad shadow of the extension of Roman power in the eastern Mediterranean, but by analyzing internationally important events of this period, such as the Roman expedition to Arabia ordered by Augustus, from a specifically Nabataean vantage point, I am able to show that 1 the Nabataeans’ self-interest often did not align with Roman objectives, and that their foreign policy flourished on its own merits. These conclusions appropriately acknowledge Nabataean individuality and autonomy, challenging the widely asserted notion that Nabataea fits a prescribed model of a client—or dependent—state of Rome. In examining the last generations of Nabataean independence, I argue against the traditional characterization that sees during these years a gradual political, economic, and cultural decline for the Nabataeans, culminating in their annexation by the Romans in 106 CE. I demonstrate that the period instead represents a time of increasing sophistication and self- confidence on the part of the Nabataeans, not one of resignation or submission to the inevitability of Roman domination. 2 Meis Parentibus i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements . iii List of Figures . iv Introduction . 1 Chapter 1: The Nabataeans and the Early Hellenistic Context . 5 Chapter 2: The Nabataeans and the Late Hellenistic Context . 24 Chapter 3: Aretas IV and the Nabataean Kingdom, 9 BCE to 40 CE . 42 Chapter 4: The Last Decades of Nabataean Independence, 40 to 106 CE . 64 Conclusion . 83 Bibliography . 85 Appendix: Map and Figures . 95 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I could not have completed a project of this scope without the considerable support, guidance, and encouragement I received along the way. I have been very fortunate in having so many outstanding teachers during the course of my academic studies. I begin by acknowledging my professors at Villanova University, especially Daniel Doyle, Ed Jaworowski, John Hunt, and the late Effie Coughanowr, and those at St. Andrews and Cambridge Universities, especially Christopher Smith, John Patterson, and Christopher Kelly. During my doctoral studies at Berkeley, I have studied and worked with many incredible professors, but I would like to particularly thank several for sharing some of the depth and breadth of their knowledge, for their infectious enthusiasm, and for their advice and counsel to me as an aspiring scholar: Sonia Shiri, Mark Griffith, Todd Hickey, Andrew Stewart, Chris Hallett, and Benjamin Porter. These latter three also served as members of my dissertation committee and provided me with invaluable feedback on various drafts of the project. All chapters in this dissertation also at some stage received careful scrutiny from a working group consisting of fellow PhD candidates in AHMA and Classics. During our colloquia, Nandini Pandey, Noah Kaye, Ryan Boehm, Tim Doran, Carolynn Roncaglia, Amy Russell, David Rosenberg-Wohl, Greg Smay, and Jason Schlude all helped to improve my arguments and to clarify my thinking with their careful readings, critiques, and insightful suggestions. I am extremely appreciative. My dissertation chair, Erich Gruen, presided over these meetings, generously opening up his house for the occasions and sharing his wisdom, experience, and great knowledge of the ancient world. He has been for me, as for so many others, both an exacting critic and a fierce advocate. I could not have wished for a better teacher and mentor. I also thank the Graduate Group in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology for its financial assistance, especially in the form of grants for archaeological work, language study, and travel in the Near East. The tireless members of the departmental staff, especially Janet Yonan and Nancy Lichtenstein, also have my fond appreciation for all the help, kind words, and advice they have provided over the years. Finally and most importantly, I am extremely grateful to my close friends and family. I give special mention here to Jason Schlude, Jordan Bulger, Ginelle Hustrulid, Nicole Robinson, to my brother Tommy, and to my parents, who know me best, who understand the true value of a good education, and who have always believed in me. iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Coin of Aretas III Philhellenos 96 Figure 2: Coin of Alexander Jannaeus 96 Figure 3: Coin of M. Scaurus with Aretas III 96 Figure 4: Coin of Obodas II 97 Figure 5: Coin of Aretas IV and Syllaios 97 Figure 6: Coin of Aretas IV with Laurel Wreath 97 Figure 7: Coin of Rabbel II 98 Figure 8: The Khazneh (the “Treasury”), Petra 98 Figure 9: Al-Dayr (the “Monastery”), Petra 99 Figure 10: Crenellated Tombs, Petra 99 Figure 11: Nabataean Painted Bowl from Phase 3b 100 iv INTRODUCTION For at least four centuries, from the days of the Successors of Alexander the Great in the late 4th century BCE until the last meaningful eastern expansion of the Roman empire under the emperor Trajan at the beginning of the 2nd century CE, a partially nomadic and highly prosperous civilization governed a capacious territory stretching at its height from the Hawran in southern Syria to the Arabian Hejaz and including large parts of the Negev, Sinai, and eastern Jordanian desert, while consistently occupying an important place in the ancient Mediterranean political, cultural, and economic landscapes. With such a resume, this people ought to be well known, understood, and appreciated, but replying “the Nabataeans” to a query about the subject of one’s dissertation will, more than likely, elicit a quizzical look from the interlocutor. Numerous recent museum exhibitions, cameo appearances of their monuments in modern cinema, increased access for archaeologists and tourists to remains of their culture in previously off-limits or politically fraught areas of Jordan, Syria, and even Saudi Arabia, and—not least—the recent designation of their ancient capital of Petra as one of the new seven wonders of the world, have certainly helped in raising the Nabataean profile. Still, while a serious academic discussion of ancient trade, water management, Semitic linguistics, or Alexandrian-inspired architecture might now be expected to include the Nabataeans, this fascinating civilization remains, even to the general scholar of the ancient Mediterranean world, highly enigmatic, perplexing, and often surprising. For both political and academic reasons, in particular the traditional (and largely artificial) boundaries that have often persisted between disciplines interested in the ancient Classical and Near Eastern worlds, the Nabataeans long languished in relative obscurity. This situation has fortunately
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Systems at Yasileh
    ARAM, 23 (2011) 619-644. doi: 10.2143/ARAM.23.0.2959676 WATER SYSTEMS AT YASILEH Prof. ZEIDOUN AL-MUHEISEN* (Yarmouk University) Yasileh is located 9 km east of Irbid and 5 km west of ar-Ramtha, in north- ern Jordan. The site of Yasileh has an important geographical location since the area was a crossroad sfor the ancient trading routes between Southern Syria, Jordan and Palestine, in addition to the fact that the land in the sur- rounding area is very fertile and very well suited to agriculture. The Wadi ash-Shallalih area, including the site of Yasileh, a natural basin in which to collect rainwater where the annual rainfall for the Yasileh area has been esti- mated at between 400-500 mm. A sufficient supply of water was also ensured by cisterns cut into the rocky sides of Wadi Yasileh, as well as a spring located 1 km to the north of the site. Yasileh has a variety of water sources, storage and delivery systems including springs, reservoirs, wells, dams, tunnels and canals. Since 1988, ten campaigns have been carried out by the Institute of Archeology and Anthropology at Yarmouk University. Based on the results of the archaeological activities in the site headed by the author, this article will shed light on the water systems at Yasileh. INTRODUCTION The Yasileh site is located in Wadi ash-Shallalih, which represents the lower reaches of Wadi Warran (Schumacher 1890, 108). Wadi ash-Shallalih runs through the area between Hauran and ‘Ajlun and is fed by tributaries arising in the ‘Ajlun mountains; running west of the village of Suf, it continues north- ward to reach the area of ar-Ramtha, where it is known as Wadi Warran.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrian and the Greek East
    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Storytelling: Iconography and Manipulation of History on the Scaurus-Aretas Coins
    Visual Storytelling: Iconography and Manipulation of History on the Scaurus-Aretas Coins In 58 BCE, aedile Marcus Aemilius Scaurus minted a coin which named “Rex Aretas” and depicted him in a submissive posture. The intent of this iconography was to illustrate the victory of Pompey and Scaurus over the Nabataean King, Aretas III, during their campaigns in the Near East in the late 60s BCE. The image was completed with a camel standing in the background, confirming the foreign and exotic nature of King Aretas and his Nabataean Arabs (Figure 1). However, this posture of submission seems to be nothing more than creative storytelling. The historical record of Pompey and Scaurus’ victories over Nabataea is not clear and arguments can convincingly be made that Nabataea was never defeated by the Romans up to this point (Schmid 2009). While Pompey return to Rome to celebrate his third triumph, his general, Scaurus, was left behind with two legions as the governor of Syria and intended to ensure peace in the region after Pompey’s reorganization. In same year (62 BCE), Scaurus led his forces into Nabataean territory and attempted to seize the capital of Petra. He was largely unsuccessful, failing entirely to take the famous red-rock city. Aretas III was persuaded by Hyrcanus of Judea to pay Scaurus to withdraw – agreeing to give the Roman 300 talents of silver to leave the land unmolested further. Scaurus accepted the payment (or bribe) and withdrew. No evidence of any official surrender or subjugation exists. Scaurus went on to move up the cursus honorum and became aedile (58 BCE), praetor (56 BCE), and eventually propraetor (55 BCE).
    [Show full text]
  • Jeffrey Eli Pearson
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Contextualizing the Nabataeans: A Critical Reassessment of their History and Material Culture Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4dx9g1rj Author Pearson, Jeffrey Eli Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Contextualizing the Nabataeans: A Critical Reassessment of their History and Material Culture By Jeffrey Eli Pearson A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Erich Gruen, Chair Chris Hallett Andrew Stewart Benjamin Porter Spring 2011 Abstract Contextualizing the Nabataeans: A Critical Reassessment of their History and Material Culture by Jeffrey Eli Pearson Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology University of California, Berkeley Erich Gruen, Chair The Nabataeans, best known today for the spectacular remains of their capital at Petra in southern Jordan, continue to defy easy characterization. Since they lack a surviving narrative history of their own, in approaching the Nabataeans one necessarily relies heavily upon the commentaries of outside observers, such as the Greeks, Romans, and Jews, as well as upon comparisons of Nabataean material culture with Classical and Near Eastern models. These approaches have elucidated much about this
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Doctrine of Ishmael 1. Ishmael Was the Firstborn Son of Abraham By
    Doctrine of Ishmael 1. Ishmael was the firstborn son of Abraham by Hagar, an Egyptian maid of his wife Sarah. Abraham was 86 at the time and had lived in Canaan for 11 years. 2. Sarah, the barren wife, in keeping with customs of her times as seen in the Babylonian law code of Hammurabi, gave her slave Hagar to Abraham to produce an heir for the family. 3. When Abraham was 99 God renewed His covenant with him and enjoined circumcision of Ishmael as a sign of his membership in the covenant community. 4. God also announced that He would fulfill the divine promise through his wife Sarah, although Abraham looked on Ishmael with deep affection and prayed that he might be the promised heir (Gen 17:18). Gen 17:18 And Abraham said unto God, O that Ishmael might live before thee! Gen 17:19 And God said, Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac: and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him. 5. When Ishmael was circumcised, Abraham and his household (those born to the men and women who had grown up in his employ and newcomers to the household through purchase from foreigners) were also circumcised. 5.1 Ishmael was 13 years old at the time of his circumcision. Many Arab tribes still circumcise their youths at the age of 13. 6. Fourteen years after the birth of Ishmael, Isaac was born to Sarah and Abraham. The jealousy that had long separated Sarah from Hagar came to a breaking point at the time of the weaning of Isaac.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/28/2021 06:32:40AM Via Free Access 332 CHAPTER 9
    chapter 9 East of the River Jordan Several architectural characteristics (such as stone doors and re-used Roman monuments) found just to the north, in the Hauran, were also to be found further to the south, in what is now northern Jordan, where the cadence of settlement also seems to match.1 The area was still awaiting comprehensive archaeological investigation at the beginning of the 20th century,[1] but schol- ars such as David Kennedy have illuminated Jordan’s military history, as have others her legacy of churches.2 Irbid Oliphant (who largely parrotted Seetzen[2]) visited one house at Irbid / Abila, which was missing the actual door: “the framework of the door was all carved stone; and there were sockets in the lintels and thresholds for pivots to work in, showing that formerly the door was a slab of stone turning on a stone hinge.”[3] More might have survived in 1810, when Seetzen visited the town, finding it deserted: Some beautiful remains of the ancient walls are to be discovered, together with a number of arches, and of columns of marble, basalt, and grey granite. On the outside of these ancient walls I found also a great many columns, two of which were of extraordinary magnitude, from which I concluded that there must have been formerly in this spot a considerable temple.[4] Merrill saw “fine Roman ruins, and some evident marks of very great antiquity” at Irbid in 1881, including “a small, well-preserved Roman building, which may have been a temple or a tomb, was an inscription within a nicely carved wreath, perfectly round.”[5] He questioned people about Roman roads and antiquities in the vicinity, and was told what they said was the road: 1 El-Khouri 2009: the archaeological landscape in north-west Jordan, including (27–60) sites, roads and agriculture, and 61–139 for catalogue of Roman sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham, What Kind of an Ancestor Is He ? a New Look at Biblical Traditions
    A. de Pury, Abraham. A New Look 1 Abraham, what kind of an ancestor is he ? A new look at Biblical traditions As we all know — be we Muslims, Christians, or Jews — Abraham is a much loved, much coveted, much invoked, and therefore perhaps disputed ancestor1. Our respective traditions are well known to us, even the traditions of the families of faith to which we do not belong. We know, for instance, that for Muslims2, Ibrahim (who says: aslamtu li-rabbi l-‘alamin (Sur 2,31)) is held to be the first Muslim in history, and that in Mecca the pilgrim is the guest of Ibrahim and Isma'il even more so than he is of Muhammad. Ibrahim is held in such high esteem, that in the medieval Bâb el Khalîl of Jerusalem, the gate that opens the road to Hebron, an Islamic inscription of the shahada allows the confession of Muhammad as the rasûl'Allah to be replaced by the words : ’ashhadu ’an Ibrahim khalîl-’allah3. We know that for the first Christians4 as well as for many Jewish proselytes, Abraham came to be the human father par excellence, the “father of faith” and the “father in faith” : having accepted the call of God, Abraham became the model of the convert, the model of the believer (l Macc 2,50-52; James 2,21-23), and, being himself justified by faith rather than by his own righteousness or obedience (Rom 4,1-5), Abraham becomes the “father” of all believers, whether they be his physical descendents or not, whether they follow or not the law of Moses, and even, at the limit, whether they be righteous or sinners.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacob in Canaan Lesson 13 Genesis 33-36
    THE BOOK OF BEGINNINGS Studies in Genesis Jacob in Canaan Lesson 13 Genesis 33-36 Trinity Bible Church Sunday School November 26, 2017 Genesis – the Book of Beginnings < The great salvation of God • The revelation of God in Christ (John 1:18; 5:39) • The revelation of Christ’s work of salvation (John 14:6; 1 John 4:14) < The work of salvation in man – “the just shall live by faith” (Hab 2:4) < Style – narrative – stories from history Genesis 1-11 – Setting the Stage < Creation • God Almighty - Sovereign LORD • Man – image of God; servant of God • Good creation < The Fall • “We fail because we distrust God, and distrusting we disobey Him.” Griffith Thomas, D.D. • The death of man and creation – the curse of God • Great wickedness; every intent of the heart only evil continually Genesis 1-11 – Setting the Stage < The Flood • The wrath of God against sin • Total destruction with preservation of 8 humans and 2 or 7 of all animals • Inability of the flood to eradicate sin and the curse. < The Tower of Babel • Rebellion against God’s command to populate the earth (1:28 and 9:1) • Division by language (10:5, 20, 31; 11:9) • Judgment – makes salvation harder in a divided humanity Genesis 1-11 – Setting the Stage < The Gospel introduced • Protevangelium (3:15) • “The LORD had regard for Abel and his offering.” (4:4) • Enoch (5:22-24) • Noah found grace (6:8) • Lamech’s hope (5:29) • The Covenant with Noah, animals and the earth (9:1-17) Genesis 12-50 – Beginning of Salvation < The revelation of the plan begins in earnest < Abraham • The Abrahamic Covenant/Promise (12:1-3, 7; Hebrews 8) – Great nation; blessing; blessing to all nations; Seed of Abraham • Justification by faith (15:6; Gal 3:6-7; Rom 4:1-4) < Isaac • Isaac and Ishmael – no place for human works (21:9-14; Gal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Amazing Prophecies of Muhammad in the Bible Them
    _____________________________________________ THE AMAZING PROPHECIES OF MUHAMMAD in the BIBLE Twenty-Eight Proofs from the Bible of Muhammad’s Prophethood _____________________________________________ The Clear Religion Series - Part 5 Excerpted from Who Deserves to Be Worshipped www.saaid.net/The-clear-religion/017.pdf Majed S. Al-Rassi Edited by Ann Ronayne Revised 2019 This book may be copied and distributed for free as long as no changes are made. www.saaid.net/The-clear-religion/06.pdf NO DOUBT THIS LIFE IS AN EXAMINATION WHICH NEEDS YOUR FULL CONSIDERATION AS TO WHAT YOU WILL TAKE TO YOUR FINAL DESTINATION ONLY TRUE BELIEF AND GOOD DEEDS ARE YOUR WAY TO SALVATION (Muhammad Sherif) CONTENTS HONORIFIC PHRASES IN THIS BOOK 3 ABOUT THE WORD ‘LORD’ 3 ABOUT THE WORD ‘ALLAH’ 4 INTRODUCTION 5 MUHAMMAD (BPUH) IN THE BIBLE 7 THE MAIN ATTRIBUTES OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD’S PROFILE IN THE BIBLE 9 1. His name 9 2. His characteristics 10 3. The location from which he was to emerge 27 4. The message to be revealed through him 29 5. Fulfilment of prophecies which he foretold 31 6. The time when he was to appear 33 7. The unique proof 36 8. The lack of warnings from previous prophets 36 9. The consistency between Muhammad’s and Jesus’ teachings 37 THIS IS IT 40 A WHISPER 41 HOW TO BECOME A MUSLIM 44 BEST DECISION THEY EVER MADE 49 Other Muslims who were formerly Christians 57 2 The amazing prophecies of Muhammad in the Bible BIBLIOGRAPHY 59 APPENDIX 60 GLOSSARY OF ISLAMIC TERMS 62 HONORIFIC PHRASES IN THIS BOOK (the Exalted): used after the mention of God/Allah to express: Glorified and Exalted is He (bpuh): Blessings and peace be upon him; used after mention of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh): Peace be upon him; used after mention of any prophet or after mention of Angel Gabriel (May Allah be pleased with her): used after mention of a female Companion of the Prophet ABOUT THE WORD ‘LORD’ he word lord in English has several related meanings.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCTORAL THESIS Interpretation and Presentation of Nabataeans Innovative Technologies: Case Study Petra/Jordan
    DOCTORAL THESIS Interpretation and Presentation of Nabataeans Innovative Technologies: Case Study Petra/Jordan Submitted to the Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering, and Urban Planning Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus, Germany, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Engineer (Dr. Ing), 2006-2011 by Yazan Safwan Al-Tell (Born 07-04-1977 in Amman, Jordan) Supervisors: Prof. Dr. h.c. Jörg J. Kühn Prof.Dr. Stephen G. Schmid Prof. Dr. Ing. Adolf Hoffmann I Abstract The Nabataeans were people of innovation and technology. Many clear evidences were left behind them that prove this fact. Unfortunately for a site like Petra, visited by crowds of visitors and tourists every day, many major elements need to be strengthened in terms of interpretation and presentation techniques in order to reflect the unique and genuine aspects of the place. The major elements that need to be changed include: un-authorized tour guides, insufficient interpretation site information in terms of quality and display. In spite of Jordan‘s numerous archaeological sites (especially Petra) within the international standards, legislations and conventions that discuss intensively interpretation and presentation guidelines for archaeological site in a country like Jordan, it is not easy to implement these standards in Petra at present for several reasons which include: presence of different stakeholders, lack of funding, local community. Moreover, many interpretation and development plans were previously made for Petra, which makes it harder to determine the starting point. Within the work I did, I proposed two ideas for developing interpretation technique in Petra. First was using the theme technique, which creates a story from the site or from innovations done by the inhabitants, and to be presented to visitors in a modern approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Julia Wilker University of Pennsylvania
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 25 (2018): 127–145 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.18.007.8927 www.ejournals.eu/electrum BETWEEN EMPIRES AND PEERS: HASMONEAN FOREIGN POLICY UNDER ALEXANDER JANNAEUS Julia Wilker University of Pennsylvania Abstract: During the reign of Alexander Jannaeus (103–76 BCE), Judea underwent a number of signifi cant changes. This article explores one of them: the fundamental shift in foreign policy strategy. This shift becomes most apparent in the king’s decision to not renew the alliance with Rome, which had been a hallmark of Hasmonean foreign policy since the days of Judas Mac- cabaeus. However, a close analysis of Alexander Jannaeus’ policy regarding other foreign powers demonstrates that the end of the Judean-Roman alliance did not happen in a vacuum. It is shown that under Alexander Jannaeus, the Hasmonean state adopted a different strategy towards imperial powers by focusing on deescalation and ignorance rather than alliances. In contrast, interactions with other rising states in the vicinity, such as the Nabateans and Itureans, increased. This new orientation in foreign policy refl ected changes in Hasmonean identity and self-defi nition; Judea did not need imperial support to maintain its independence anymore but strived to increase its status as a regional power. Key words: Hasmoneans, Alexander Jannaeus, Jewish-Roman relations, foreign relations. The reign of Alexander Jannaeus (103–76 BCE) constituted a seminal period in the his- tory of Hellenistic Judea; his rule signifi es both the acme and a turning point of the Has- monean state. The length of his tenure as king – second only to that of his father, John Hyrcanus (135–105/104 BCE) – stands in signifi cant contrast to that of his predecessor, Aristobulus I, who died after having ruled for less than a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Contesting the Greatness of Alexander the Great: the Representation of Alexander in the Histories of Polybius and Livy
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: CONTESTING THE GREATNESS OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT: THE REPRESENTATION OF ALEXANDER IN THE HISTORIES OF POLYBIUS AND LIVY Nikolaus Leo Overtoom, Master of Arts, 2011 Directed By: Professor Arthur M. Eckstein, Department of History By investigating the works of Polybius and Livy, we can discuss an important aspect of the impact of Alexander upon the reputation and image of Rome. Because of the subject of their histories and the political atmosphere in which they were writing - these authors, despite their generally positive opinions of Alexander, ultimately created scenarios where they portrayed the Romans as superior to the Macedonian king. This study has five primary goals: to produce a commentary on the various Alexander passages found in Polybius’ and Livy’s histories; to establish the generally positive opinion of Alexander held by these two writers; to illustrate that a noticeable theme of their works is the ongoing comparison between Alexander and Rome; to demonstrate Polybius’ and Livy’s belief in Roman superiority, even over Alexander; and finally to create an understanding of how this motif influences their greater narratives and alters our appreciation of their works. CONTESTING THE GREATNESS OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT: THE REPRESENTATION OF ALEXANDER IN THE HISTORIES OF POLYBIUS AND LIVY By Nikolaus Leo Overtoom Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 2011 Advisory Committee: Professor Arthur M. Eckstein, Chair Professor Judith P. Hallett Professor Kenneth G. Holum © Copyright by Nikolaus Leo Overtoom 2011 Dedication in amorem matris Janet L.
    [Show full text]