DOCSLIB.ORG

APPROPRIATION TITLE: Construction, General - Channels and Harbors (Navigation)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPROPRIATION TITLE: Construction, General - Channels and Harbors (Navigation) APPROPRIATION TITLE: construction, General - channels and Harbors (NaVigation) PROJECT: Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Maryland, Brewerton Channel (New} LOCATION: Baltimore Harbor is situated at the head of the navigable portion of the Patapsco River, approximately 172 miles from the entrance to chesapeake Bay at the Virginia Cape. The Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension (also known as the connecting Channel to the C&b canal) is located in the northern portion of the chesapeake Bay and extends from the main Ship channels of the mouth of the Patapsco -River in an easto..southeasterly direction across the Chesapeake Bay, MD. DESCRIPTION: The River & Harbor Act of 1958 authorized a uniform main channel 42 feet deep, ~nd generally 800 (in Maryland, and Rappahanno6k shoal in Virginia) or 1,000 (Cape Henry and York Spit in Virginia) feet wide through the chesapeake Bay from the Virginia Capes to For·t McHenry in the Port of Baltimore, a distance of 172 miles; southern approach and connecting channels to the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide, branch channels r"anging from 22 to 42 feet deep and 200 to 600 feet wide in curtis creek, curtis Bay, Ferry Bar, and the Northwest Brandh, and anchorages 30 and 35 feet deep. The project modification is complete except for wider'ling the western five miles of the Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension from 450 to 600 feet: AUTHORIZATION: River and Harbor Act ot 3 July 1958, REMAINING BENEFIT-COST RATIO: 16,0 to 1 at 7 1/8 percent. TOTAL BENEFIT-COST RATIO: 11. 8. to 1 at 7 1/8 percent. BASIS OF BENEFIT-COST RATIO: Benefi-ts are from the Limited Reevaluation Report and Environmental Asse:Ssment dated August 1997 approved 15 october 1997. ACCUM. !>HYSICAL SUMMARIZED FI~CIAL, DATA PCT. OF ES·T. STATUS PERCENT COMPLETION FED COST (1 .:tan. 1999) .COMPLETE SCH.EDULE Estimated Total Appropriation Requirement 44,521,000 Future Non-Federal Reimbursement 39, 000 Entire P.rojec~ 0 Being determined Estimate~ Federal Cost' (Ultimate) 44,482,000 Estimated Non-Federal cost: 9,269,000 cash Contr"ibutions 3,505,000 other Costs 5, 725,, 000 Reimbursements: Conunl Navigation 39,000 Total Estimated Project Cost $53,751,000 Division: North Atlantic District: Baltimore Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD, · BrewertOn Channel 1 February 1999 96 SUHMAR!ZED FINANCIAL DATA (continued) Allocation to 30 september 1998 $34,943,000 Conference Allowance for FY 1999 0 Allocations for FY 1999 0 Allocations to Date 34,943, 000 78 Allocation Requested for FY 2000 9, 578,000 100 Scheduled Balance to ·Complete after FY 2000 Unscheduled Baiance to Complete after FY 2000 0 PHYSICAL DATA completed Work (under 1958 Mod) - Channels: Main ~hip channels, Virginia - cape Henry and York spit section!3, 42 feet deep and 1, 000 feet Wide; Rappanhannock Shoal, 42 feet· deep and 800 feet wide, a total of 16.7 miles long. Main ship chanriel, Maryland "'- Crc\ighill Entrance to Ft. McHenry, 42 feet deep,. 800 ,feet wide anct 20.2 miles long. Branch Channels, Ma.i:yland- curtis Bay and Ferry Bar, 42 feet deep, 600 feet wide and 3.7 miles long. Approach Channel to C&D Canal Haryland- 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide. and 15.8 miles l'ong. Separable Element - Connecting Channel to C&D canal, Maryland - 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide {currently 450 feet wide for western 5 miles) and 6.3 miles long. JUSTIFICATION: Baltimore Harbor is one of the major seaports serving the North Atlantic ~oast of the United States. It is equipped with excellent cargo handling facilities artd is served by several railroads which connect the port with the Midwest States. The port is 50 to 200 miles nearer the Midwest States than other·North Atlantic pOrts. The port ihcludes, among its many irtdustries, the free world's largest steel plant. Waterborne conunerce through the port totaled 43,552,000 tons in 1996 and averaged 40,610,600 tons annually for the period 1987-1996. A large portion of the port's commerce moves in foreiqn trade, and a very high percentage consists of bulk commodities (grain, ores, petroie\lll\ and coal). These bulk conunodities are moved most efficiently in large carriers, and the trend toWards such car.tiers is clearly evident in the Port of Baltirrtore. The smaller vessels are being replaced by larger, more ef-ficient ships. The Connecting Channel provides a key link to the channel system leadin9' from the port through the C&D canal. The main channel and bratlch channels were deepened to 42 feet and Widened in accordance with the project authorization, and estimated attendant average annual benefits of $6,050 1 000 are being realized. Additionally, the Approach Channels to the CliD Canal were deepened to 35 feet (authorized 'depth) and widened to 600 feet (authorized width), The Brewerton channel EaStern ExtensiOn was deepened to 35 feet and widened to 450 feet (western 5 mil~s) and 600 feet (easte.tn mile). Division: North Atlantic District: Baltimore Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD, Brewerton channel 'o 1 February l999 -97 JUSTIFICATION (continued) The work. remaining to be completed is widening the western 5 miles of the Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension (connect~ng Ch~nnel to the C&D Canal) from 4.50 fe~t .to 600 feet (authorized width). The approvect Limited Reev.;tluation Report and Env:ronmental Assessment recorrunends widehing the we~tern 5 miles from 450 to 600 feet to increase navi ation ~:~~i and to ~ncrease transportation savings _by avoiding delays for ships waiting to transit the channel or avoi~ing a t -th e lonige7' rout~ b~tween Baltimore ijarbor and the C&D cailal. The average ann\tal be~efit~, all navigation related 0 e rerna. n~~g work are $14, 106,000 at 1 octo~e.r 19,94 ·~rices.. · ' 1 FISCAL YEAR 2000: The reqUe~ted amount will be applied as follows: Initiate 'and complete wideniilg tlle Brewerton Channel . $9, 1'83, 000 Construction Managen\ent 395,000 Total $9; 578, o.oo NON-FEDERAL COSTS: In accordance with the cost sh·aring and financing corice!'ts reflected in th~ water Resource~ _Development Act of 1986, the Non-Fedeial sponsor must comply with the: requirements' listed below: Payments Annual ·During Operation, constrl.lction Maintenance and and Reimbursements' ReplMement Requirements of Local cooperation Costs $ 5,725,000 Provide la~~s, easements and r~ghts of way, Disposal areas Pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to general navigation 3,505;000 facilities during construction G~.nd p~y 50 percent of the costs of .~ncremented niaintenance below 45 feet below mean low water ~eimbu~se an additional 10 percent of the costs of general 39,000 navigation featUres au,ocated to cotnmercial navigation within a pe:iod of 30 years following completion of construction, as ~art~ally red~ced by a credit allowed for the value of dredged ~~terial· disposal areas provided for conunercial na,vigation Total Non-Federal Costs $9,269,000 $ 0 The non-Federal· sponsor has also agreed to repay its share of construction costs during construction and reimburse its share of construction costs over a period of 30 ·years following completion of construction, Division: NOrth Atlantic District: Baltimore Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD, Brewerton Channel February 1999 98 STATUS OF LOCAL COOPERATION: The state .of Maryland is furnishing the required local cooperation. Assurance of compliance with the requirements of local cooperation were accepted on 16 March 1961. The local cooperation agreement for .the Baltimore Harbor and Channels, 42-FOot .. Project · was executed with the State of Haryl~~d on 11 }\ugust 1,98i; B:y · letter dated 18 February 1993, the state requested that the Connecting Channel to the C&D canal be widened and that a suitable area·would be provided for disposal of the dredged material. The state has· designated the Hart-l>liller Island containment facility and has raised the containment dikes to ensure sufficient capacity is available to Contain the dr~dged material. A project Cooperation· Agreement for the separable e~ernent is scheduled to be executed with the state of• Maryland by October 1999 COMPARISON OF FEDERAL COST ESTIMA.TES: The current Federal {C of E) cost estimate of $44,521,000 is an increas~ of $11 221, 000 over the latest eStimate ($43, 300, 000) submitted to Congress (FY 1987}. This change includ.es the fol~owing items: Item Amount Price Escalation on Construction Features 3, 871,000 Other Estimating Adjustments -2,650,000 Total $ 1, 221, o·oo ST~TUS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATE11ENT: The Final Environmental Impact Statement - Proposed Plan for Completing the Navigation Improvements, Authorized by t:.he 1958 River and Harbor Act for the Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Maryland and Virginia, filed witJ:t the Environmental Protection Agency on November 21, · 1979; the Supplem~nt to .the General J?esi_gn . , Memorandum and Supplemental In!ormation Report for the Baltimore Harbor and Channels Maryland and Virginia 42-Foot ~ Project, was filed with the Office of Federal Activities on June 23 1986, and a Final Envi:Corunental,ASsessment . r- 1 1 including Finding of No Significant Impact is included in the Limited Reevaluation· Report and EnvirOnmental Assessment approved o~ 15 October 1997. OTHER INFORMATION: In~tial planning and initial coristruction funds were appropriated in FY 1961. The current Federal cost estimate of $44,5~1, 000 includes $33,9911 000 for completed work and $10,530, 000 for widening the Bre~erton Channel~ The current non-Federal cost estimate of $9,269,000 includes $4,360, 000 for completed work and $4,909 1 000 for the Br~we.tton channel widening.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hurricane & Tropical Storm
    5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • The Weather and Circulation of September 1967
    956 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW Vol. 95, No. 12 THE WEATHER AND CIRCULATION OF SEPTEMBER 1967 A Month of Continued Record Warmth in the West, Coolness in the East, and Frequent Tropical Activity A. JAMES WAGNER Extended Forecast Division, Weather Bureau, ESSA, Suitland, Md. 1. HIGHLIGHTS Bureau records. This intense Gulf of Alaska Low rep- In most areas of the Nation, the temperature patterns resented a monthly 700-mb. height fall of 340 ft. more of July and August persisted into September 1967, result- than the normal August to September change (fig. 3). An- ing in cool spells, heat waves, and dry periods of record- other deep vortex which was 380 ft. below normal was breaking length. Some sections of the South have had located over northern Baffin Island. These centers of record-breaking coolness all summer, while excessive heat action gave rise to a generally high index situation, and continued drought plagued much of the Northwest. although weak positive anomalies were observed north Maximum temperatures averaged in the eighties during of the Bering Straits and over Scandanavia (fig. 2). September 1967 for only the second time since 1892 at Southern Canada and the northern United States were Missoula, Mont. Temperatures soared into the nineties dominated by a large zonally oriented band of above numerous times throughout the month in the Far West normal heights extending from the Pacific Coast to the and Northern Rockies, setting new records for the total central Atlantic. This pattern was somewhat unusual, as number of days with 90' F. or above for the month or for ordinarily a deep trough would be expected downstream the season.
    [Show full text]
  • Unmanned Vehicle Systems & Operations on Air, Sea, Land
    Kansas State University Libraries New Prairie Press NPP eBooks Monographs 10-2-2020 Unmanned Vehicle Systems & Operations on Air, Sea, Land Randall K. Nichols Kansas State University Hans. C. Mumm Wayne D. Lonstein Julie J.C.H Ryan Candice M. Carter See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/ebooks Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons, Aviation and Space Education Commons, Higher Education Commons, and the Other Engineering Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Nichols, Randall K.; Mumm, Hans. C.; Lonstein, Wayne D.; Ryan, Julie J.C.H; Carter, Candice M.; Hood, John-Paul; Shay, Jeremy S.; Mai, Randall W.; and Jackson, Mark J., "Unmanned Vehicle Systems & Operations on Air, Sea, Land" (2020). NPP eBooks. 35. https://newprairiepress.org/ebooks/35 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Monographs at New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in NPP eBooks by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Randall K. Nichols, Hans. C. Mumm, Wayne D. Lonstein, Julie J.C.H Ryan, Candice M. Carter, John-Paul Hood, Jeremy S. Shay, Randall W. Mai, and Mark J. Jackson This book is available at New Prairie Press: https://newprairiepress.org/ebooks/35 UNMANNED VEHICLE SYSTEMS & OPERATIONS ON AIR, SEA, LAND UNMANNED VEHICLE SYSTEMS & OPERATIONS ON AIR, SEA, LAND PROFESSOR RANDALL K. NICHOLS, JULIE RYAN, HANS MUMM, WAYNE LONSTEIN, CANDICE CARTER, JEREMY SHAY, RANDALL MAI, JOHN P HOOD, AND MARK JACKSON NEW PRAIRIE PRESS MANHATTAN, KS Copyright © 2020 Randall K.
    [Show full text]
  • The Town of Huntington Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
    The Town of Huntington Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Adopted by the Huntington Select Board on December 7, 2016 The Huntington Hazard Mitigation Committee and Pioneer Valley Planning Commission 60 Congress Street Springfield, MA 01104 (413) 781-6045 www.pvpc.org This project was funded by a grant received from the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) and the Massachusetts Department of Conservation Services (formerly the Department of Environmental Management). Acknowledgements The Huntington Select Board extends special thanks to the Huntington Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee as follows: Gary Dahill, Fire Chief Charles Dazelle, Highway Superintendent Robert Garriepy, Police Chief Linda Hamlin, Planning Board Susan McIntosh, Conservation Commission Jeff McKittrick, Selectboard Chair John McVeigh, Selectboard The Huntington Select Board offers thanks to the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) for developing the Massachusetts Hazard Mitigation Plan which served as a model for this plan update. In addition, special thanks are extended to the staff of the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission for professional services, process facilitation and preparation of this document. The Pioneer Valley Planning Commission Catherine Ratté, Principal Planner/Manager Shawn Rairigh, Senior Planner Ashley Eaton, Planner Jake Dolinger, GIS Specialist 1: Planning Process 1 Introduction 1 Hazard Mitigation Committee 2 Participation by Stakeholders 3 Select Board Meeting 5 2: Local Profile 6 Community Setting 6 Infrastructure 7 Natural
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Deconstruction of Dyke Marsh, George Washington
    Analysis of the Deconstruction of Dyke Marsh, George Washington Memorial Parkway, Virginia: Progression, Geologic and Manmade Causes, and Effective Restoration Scenarios Dyke Marsh image credit: NASA Open-File Report 2010-1269 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photograph: Hurricane Isabel approaching landfall, September 17, 2003. The storm’s travel path is shaded, and trends from southeast to north-northwest. The initial cloud bands from Isabel are arriving at Dyke Marsh in this image. Base imagery taken from a LANDSAT 5 visible image; see appendix 3A. Analysis of the Deconstruction of Dyke Marsh, George Washington Memorial Parkway, Virginia: Progression, Geologic and Manmade Causes, and Effective Restoration Scenarios By Ronald J. Litwin, Joseph P. Smoot, Milan J. Pavich, Helaine W. Markewich, Erik Oberg, Ben Helwig, Brent Steury, Vincent L. Santucci, Nancy J. Durika, Nancy B. Rybicki, Katharina M. Engelhardt, Geoffrey Sanders, Stacey Verardo, Andrew J. Elmore, and Joseph Gilmer Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Open-File Report 2010–1269 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessment: Hazard Profiles
    This Working Draft Submittal is a preliminary draft document and is not to be used as the basis for final design, construction or remedial action, or as a basis for major capital decisions. Please be advised that this document and associated deliverables have not undergone internal reviews by URS. SECTION 3a - RISK ASSESSMENT: HAZARD PROFILES SECTION 3a- RISK ASSESSMENT: HAZARD PROFILES Overview Detailed profiles of hazards identified in the previous section as worthy of further evaluation in the overall risk assessment are provided in this section. Each hazard profile includes a description of the hazard and its causes and impacts, the location and extent of areas subject to the hazard, known historical occurrences, and the probability of future occurrences. The profiles also include specific information noted by members of the planning committee and other stakeholders, including unique observations or relevant anecdotal information regarding individual historical hazard occurrences and individual jurisdictions. The following table summarizes each hazard, and whether or not it has been identified as a hazard worthy of further evaluation for each of the 22 municipal jurisdictions in the County. Following Table 3a.1, Figure 3a.1 presents a map of Rensselaer County for reference, including the most significant transport links and the location and boundaries of each participating jurisdiction. Table 3a.1 Summary of Profiled Hazards by Municipality 1 4 5 3 2 Jurisdiction Flood Extreme Extreme Drought Jam Ice Tornado Wildfire Lightning Landslide
    [Show full text]
  • Suzana J. Camargo Education Professional Experience Publications
    Suzana J. Camargo Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University 61 Route 9W, 206D Oceanography, Palisades, NY 10964-8000 Phone: (845) 365-8640, Email: [email protected] Education Ph.D. Physics, 1992, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany M.S. Physics, 1989, University of Sao˜ Paulo (USP),Sao˜ Paulo, Brazil B.S. Physics, 1986, University of Sao˜ Paulo (USP),Sao˜ Paulo, Brazil Professional Experience 2007 - Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY Marie Tharp Lamont Research Professor (2019 - present) Lamont Research Professor (2013 - 2019) Lamont Associate Research Professor (2010 - 2013) Doherty Research Scientist (2009 - 2010) Doherty Associate Research Scientist (2008 - 2009) Associate Research Scientist (2007 - 2008) 2019 - Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY Adjunct Professor 2018 - The Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY Associate Faculty Member 2018 - Master of Science in Sustainability Science, Columbia University, New York, NY Lecturer 2015 - Initiative on Extreme Weather and Climate, Columbia University, New York, NY Executive Director 1999 - 2007 International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI), Columbia University, Palisades, NY Associate Research Scientist (2003 - 2007) Senior Staff Associate (1999 - 2003) 1996 -1999 Sao˜ Paulo State University (UNESP), Guaratingueta´ School of Engineering, Guaratingueta,´ Brazil Associate Professor 1993 - 1996 Max-Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (IPP), Garching, Germany Post-doctoral Research Scientist Publications H index: 50 (8,068 citations) - Google Scholar; 42 (5,517 citations) - Web of Science Core Collection; 02/05/2020 Undergraduate studentsy, graduate students◦, post-docs? mentored or co-mentored. 139. M. Bieli◦, A.H. Sobel, S.J. Camargo, and M.K. Tippett, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Climatology for the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts of the United States
    *id. lSffAq- NOAA Technical Report NWS 38 T oI Hurricane Climatology for the Atlantic and C Gulf Coasts of the United States Silver Spring, MD April 1987 Study completed under agreement EMW-84-E-1589 for FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service NOAA TECHNICAL REPORTS National Weather Service Series The National Weather Service (NWS) observes and measures atmospheric phenomena; develops and distrib utes forecasts of weather conditions and warnings of adverse weather; collects and disseminates weather information to meet the needs of the public and specialized users. The NWS develops the national meteorological service system and improves procedures, techniques, and dissemination for weather and hydrologic measurements, and forecasts. NWS series of NOAA Technical Reports is a continuation of the former series, ESSA Technical Report Weather Bureau (WB). Reports listed below are available from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Depart ment of Commerce, Sills Bldg., 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. Prices vary. Order by accession number (given in parentheses). ESSA Technical Reports WB 1 Monthly Mean 100-, 50-, 30-, and 10-Millibar Charts January 1964 through December 1965 of the IQSY Period. Staff, Upper Air Branch, National Meteorological Center, February 1967, 7 p, 96 charts. (AD 651 101) WB 2 Weekly Synoptic Analyses, 5-, 2-, and 0.4-Mb Surfaces for 1964 (based on observations of the Meteorological Rocket Network during the IQSY). Staff, Upper Air Branch, National Meteorologi cal Center, April 1967, 16 p, 160 charts. (AD 652 696) WB 3 Weekly Synoptic Analyses, 5-, 2-, and 0.4-Mb Surfaces for 1965 (based on observations of the Meteorological Rocket Network during the IQSY).
    [Show full text]
  • Dissecting and Classifying the Impacts of Historic Hurricanes on Estuarine Systems
    DISSECTING AND CLASSIFYING THE IMPACTS OF HISTORIC HURRICANES ON ESTUARINE SYSTEMS J.C. Stevenson1 and M.S. Kearney2 1 University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Horn Point Laboratory, Cambridge, MD 21613 2 Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 ABSTRACT particularly in the upper portions of the estuary. This situation differs sharply from hurricanes or Since the Great Hurricane of 1667 hit tropical storms, such as Agnes, which had high Chesapeake Bay, many have tried to describe the precipitation and runoff in the upper watershed but impacts caused by these destructive storms. Other weak winds and storm surge. Such differences than Hurricane/Tropical Storm Agnes in 1972, highlight the need for additional analyses of however, only sporadic efforts have assessed the historical storms. many changes that can occur during and after these tropical visitors pass. One problem is that INTRODUCTION hurricanes vary widely in their impact, both temporally and spatially. Not only is wind strength Along with the New World, Christopher important, but also the path that the winds take over Columbus made another startling discovery: the watershed can prove crucial in their impact. To hurricanes. He appears to have encountered his first analyze hurricane impacts more systematically, a hurricane in 1493, with an additional three during simple classification system is proposed that his Caribbean voyages. The Spanish were the first accounts for the three main forcing functions or to introduce the Caribbean Indian word for the drivers that can significantly change estuaries. severe tropical storms to Europe, but it took the The first driver emanates from the storm’s English a century to understand fully the fury of precipitation and consequent runoff, which can these storms.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Dorian ONE-YEAR UPDATE
    Hurricane Dorian ONE-YEAR UPDATE September 2020 A message from Koby Langley, senior vice president, International Services, American Red Cross Over Labor Day weekend 2019, Hurricane Dorian raked the Bahamas with catastrophic 180 mph winds and rising waters for more than two days. The deadly Category 5 storm inflicted devastating damage, leaving at least 6,000 people homeless on the Abaco Islands and Grand Bahama Island, while also posing a serious threat to the East Coast of the United States. Ultimately, the Bahamas bore the brunt of Dorian’s destruction. Thanks to an outpouring of support from our compassionate donors, the American Red Cross stood ready to assist the Bahamas Red Cross and the global Red Cross and Red Crescent network by delivering help and hope in the immediate aftermath of this heart-rending disaster. To support the ongoing needs of hard-hit residents and communities in the Bahamas, the American Red Cross has funded critical recovery efforts over the past year, including direct financial assistance, rental assistance, and aid for residents facing food insecurity and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as grants to partners assisting with home repair and rebuilds, economic recovery for small businesses, provision of clean water for drinking and cooking, and much more. And while Dorian’s impact on the United States was more limited, donated dollars also funded the work of the Red Cross here at home to provide vital support from Florida to the Carolinas, helping shelter evacuees and providing relief, comfort and recovery assistance to the areas — like Ocracoke and other North Carolina barrier islands — that saw direct impacts from the storm.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of MARYLAND WEATHER Including Chesapeake Bay by James Dawson
    HISTORY OF MARYLAND WEATHER including Chesapeake Bay by James Dawson Note: This article is in two parts. Part One is in narrative form with the high points of various weather phenomena grouped by type. Part Two, which follows, is a much more detailed chronological list. PART ONE MARYLAND’S WEATHER (If You Don’t Like It, Just Wait a Minute) by James Dawson Everybody talks about the weather, so let’s talk about our weather. Here in Mary- land, midway between the equator and the North Pole, we get a Whitman’s sampler of al- most every kind of weather there is: heat, cold, drought, flood. But we shouldn’t complain, weather wise (and otherwise) we’ve had it pretty lucky here. The extremes seldom last very long, nor are they as bad as in other parts of the country. Our climate is changeable though and it has been said that if you don’t like Eastern Shore weather, just wait a minute and we’ll get something else. In 1671, John Ogilby wrote in his New Description of Mary-Land: “The Climate is very healthful, and agreeable with English Constitutions... In Summer, the heats are equal to those of Spain, but qualifi’d daily about Noon, at that time of the Year, either with some gentle Breezes, or small Showres of Rain: In Winter there is Frost and Snow, and sometimes it is extremely cold, insomuch, that the Rivers and the Northerly part of the Bay of Chesapeach are Frozen, but it seldom lasts long; and some Winters are so warm, that People have gone in half Shirts and Drawers only at Christmas: But in the Spring and Autumn, (viz) in March, April, and May, September, Oc- tober and November, there is generally most pleasant temperate weather: The Winds there are variable, from the South comes Heat, Gusts, and Thunder; from the North or North-West, cold Weather; and in Winter, Frost and Snow; from the East and South-East, Rain.” We’ve had mild weather around Christmas, too.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
    THE TOWN OF TOLLAND NATURAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Adopted by the Tolland Board of Selectmen on __________ Prepared by: The Tolland Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee and The Pioneer Valley Planning Commission 60 Congress Street Springfield, MA 01104 (413) 781-6045 www.pvpc.org This project was funded by a grant received from the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) and the Massachusetts Department of Conservation Services (formerly the Department of Environmental Management TABLE OF CONTENTS 1: PLANNING PROCESS ............................................................................................ 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Hazard Mitigation Committee ............................................................................................................... 2 Hazard Mitigation Committee Meetings ............................................................................................... 3 Participation by Public and Neighboring Communities ......................................................................... 4 Select Board Meeting............................................................................................................................. 8 2: LOCAL PROFILE ..................................................................................................... 9 Community Setting ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]