DOCSLIB.ORG

Azu Etd Mr 2011 0090 Sip1 M.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Azu Etd Mr 2011 0090 Sip1 M.Pdf Expectant Immediatism: The South Carolina Secession Movement, 1859-1861 Item Type Electronic Thesis; text Authors Harvey, Sean Parulian Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 30/09/2021 01:51:04 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/144326 Table of Contents Introduction: A Reputation for Disunion .............................................................................................. 1 Part I: To Sow the Seeds of Disunion: Christopher Memminger’s Mission to Virginia .......................... 10 Part II: The Ties that Bind: The Association of 1860, Circular Letters and Fort Sumter ......................... 25 Conclusion: Expectations Fulfilled ...................................................................................................... 36 Bibliography ...................................................................................................................................... 38 Introduction: A Reputation for Disunion In the fall of 1860, South Carolinians thought they were living in precarious times. A group of concerned citizens, ever‐fearful of the growing power of the Republican Party, met in the waterfront town of Charleston, South Carolina. Wary of the imminent Republican ascendancy which would lead to the installment of the dreaded “Seward Platform,” these denizens of the Palmetto state eagerly sought any way to avert the potentially disastrous anti‐slavery effects of a GOP administration.1 In order to combat the menace to slavery that Lincoln and his cronies presented, these common citizens banded together to voice their displeasure and to devise methods to thwart the incoming administration. The device by which these men decided to combat the Republican Party was an organization that they dubbed the “1860 Association,” whose primary stated goal was: “to conduct a correspondence with leading men in the South, and by interchange of information and views prepare the slave states to meet the impending crisis.”2 This association, instead of banding together to effect political change by persuading voters, was preparing for war and openly advocated for disunion. To those familiar with the narrative surrounding South Carolina in the antebellum era, groups such as the “1860 Association” fit the prototypical conception of South Carolina as the paragon of disunionist sentiment. From the days when fiery Southern ideologue John C. Calhoun figuratively taunted the commander‐in‐chief over the tariff issue, South Carolina was viewed as the leader of the political fringe. South Carolina was filled with calculating characters eager to sever the ties with the federal government and concoct schemes and theories to justify a political and legal separation from the rest of the country. Due to the highly‐visible and salient rhetoric of people such as Calhoun,by 1859 the Palmetto State cultivated a reputation for being precipitate, rash, and hot‐headed. 1 Steven A. Channing, Crisis of Fear: Secession in South Carolina, (New York: WW North and CO, 1974), 95. 2 Robert N. Gourdin, as excerpted from John G. Nicholay and John G. Hay, Abraham Lincoln: A History, (New York: The Century Co, 1914), 305. 1 This radical image had its primary origins in the Nullification Crisis of 1832, in which South Carolina boldly faced down the federal government. Emboldened by the rhetoric of John C. Calhoun, the South Carolina legislature declared a symbolically‐reduced tariff null and void within their state boundaries. South Carolina was abandoned by the rest of the South to face down the irascible Andrew Jackson. The dearth of support from the rest of the South, coupled with the pressure from Washington caused South Carolina to ultimately retreat from its position. The nullifiers’ stance was ultimately untenable, so they decided to recede from its extreme rhetoric and remain within the Union. Even though the nullifiers ultimately receded from their position out of anxiety and a lack of Southern empathy, the dominant political view highlighted South Carolina’s propensity towards disunion. South Carolina tentatively advocated secession several other times in the antebellum years and their proclivity towards disunion would eventually culminate in the Palmetto State’s “Ordinance of Secession” on December 20, 1860. This decree formally dissolved any ties between the state of South Carolina and the federal government and was issued before any other Southern state even considered the secession. According to the historiography, South Carolina’s rapid secession process symbolized the rashness and irrationality that dominated the political machinations of the Palmetto state. To the analysts that ascribe a reputation of unbridled disunion upon South Carolina, the narrative of disunion begins and ends in South Carolina. It was not a question of if but how South Carolina would secede. In this historiographical tradition, the reputation of South Carolina as a petulant disunionist preceded itself. Whether this reputation is warranted or not, is a matter that has been largely ignored by historians. On the surface, Robert N. Gourdin and his coterie of disunionists appear to fit into the typical mold of South Carolina immediatists—or, as the parlance of the day would describe them, “separate‐ state actionists.”3 According to historians, an unseen cabal of powerful politicians and prominent citizens provided the impetus for disunion. Recent treatments of secession describe a secret network of 3 Charles Edward Cauthen, South Carolina Goes to War, (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1950), 4 2 powerful individuals, most prominent among them Governor William H, Gist who, “by clandestine communication with other Southern governors… offered assurances, as early as October, that his state would secede immediately upon Lincoln’s election and solicited their commitment to follow.”4 In this view—which is typical of the historiography surrounding the subject—South Carolina had unequivocally decided to exit the Union alone, with the cooperationof other states merely serving as an afterthought, or perhaps an added bonus. This framework posits a paradigm in which two opposing camps jostled to control the direction of secession in South Carolina and scholars tend to bifurcate secessionists into immediatists and coooperationists.5 Traditionally, people like Governor William H. Gist and the members of the 1860 Association are described as immediatists, since they advocated “immediate secession, alone if necessary.” In the typical narrative surrounding the secession movement, immediatists, or separate‐ state actionists comprised the overwhelming majority of secessionists, and were confined to the upper‐ echelons of the political elite. In contrast to that faction stood the cooperationists, who claimed to “stand for secession ultimately alone if necessary, but only after an attempt had been made in a Southern conference to enlist the cooperation of other Southern states.”6 The primary argument states that cooperationists comprised the majority of South Carolinians, and were largely coerced by immediatists into exiting the Union, or falsely‐informed that cooperation with other states was imminent.7 While the separation of secessionists into two discrete camps is a useful tool to understand the political tension among the Gulf‐Squadron states upon the eve of the Civil War, this starkly‐divided conception over‐simplifies the ultimate purpose that motivated both immediatists and cooperationists 4 Stephanie McCurry, Confederate Reckoning: Power and Politics in the Civil War South, (Harvard University Press, 2010), 51. 5 Charles Edward Cauthen, South Carolina Goes to War, 4. 6 Ibid. 7 McCurry, Confederate Reckoning: Power and Politics in the Civil War South, 51‐52. 3 to depart from the Union. Undeniably, the goal for both immediatists and cooperationists was the creation of an independent Southern nation, which inevitably required the collaboration of other slaveholding states.8 This goal remained foremost on the minds of immediatists such as Robert N. Gourdin and the 1860 Association, which engaged in practices such as pamphleteering and circular correspondence directed at other Southern states to bolster support for “the cause of Southern Union and Independence.”9 Consistent with the goals of cooperationists, Governor William Henry Gist eagerly eagerly sought the assurance of other Southern states. The Governor declared: “It is the desire of South Carolina that some other state should take the lead or move at least simultaneously with her… [i]f no other State takes the lead, South Carolina will secede…alone, if she has any assurance that she will be soon followed by another or other States; otherwise it is doubtful.”10 When examining the secession movement from its genesis in 1859 to its consummation in 1861, it becomes apparent that the movement was founded upon the notion that even if secession were undertaken separately, it required the eventual cooperation of other states. In order to fully comprehend the secession movement in South Carolina, it is critical to understand that cooperationism and immediatism were not mutually‐exclusive. To be sure, leaders such as Gist felt that cooperation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unali'yi Lodge
    Unali’Yi Lodge 236 Table of Contents Letter for Our Lodge Chief ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Letter from the Editor ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Local Parks and Camping ...................................................................................................................................... 9 James Island County Park ............................................................................................................................................... 10 Palmetto Island County Park ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Wannamaker County Park ............................................................................................................................................. 13 South Carolina State Parks ................................................................................................................................. 14 Aiken State Park ................................................................................................................................................................. 15 Andrew Jackson State Park ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Survey at Rose Hill Plantation State Historic Site
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Faculty & Staff Publications Institute of 9-2020 Archaeological Survey at Rose Hill Plantation State Historic Site Stacey L. Young Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/sciaa_staffpub Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Archaeological Survey at Rose Hill Plantation State Historic Site By Stacey L. Young, Director, SCIAA Applied Research Division The South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, Applied Research Division (SCIAA-ARD) recently completed a Phase I archaeological survey of Rose Hill Plantation State Historic Site located along the Tyger River in Union County, South Carolina. The work was performed on behalf of SC Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism (SCPRT) to assist park staff with management of the property and site interpretation. Rose Hill is an early 19th to mid-20th-century plantation site that was home to William Henry Gist, his family, and families of enslaved laborers, sharecroppers, and tenant farmers, until it was sold in 1939 to the US Forest Service (USFS). The site now operates as a State Historic Site operated by SCPRT. Rose Hill was listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) in 1970 for its association with William Henry Gist, his prominence in politics, and the architecture of the house. Figure 3: 1933 aerial image showing tenant house locations, fields, and Gist house. (Photo by SCIAA-ARD) William Henry Gist (1807-1874), Cotton and corn were grown on the perhaps mostly known for his secessionist plantation that was maintained by a views, served various positions in the population of about 200 enslaved laborers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Other Side of the Monument: Memory, Preservation, and the Battles of Franklin and Nashville
    THE OTHER SIDE OF THE MONUMENT: MEMORY, PRESERVATION, AND THE BATTLES OF FRANKLIN AND NASHVILLE by JOE R. BAILEY B.S., Austin Peay State University, 2006 M.A., Austin Peay State University, 2008 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2015 Abstract The thriving areas of development around the cities of Franklin and Nashville in Tennessee bear little evidence of the large battles that took place there during November and December, 1864. Pointing to modern development to explain the failed preservation of those battlefields, however, radically oversimplifies how those battlefields became relatively obscure. Instead, the major factor contributing to the lack of preservation of the Franklin and Nashville battlefields was a fractured collective memory of the two events; there was no unified narrative of the battles. For an extended period after the war, there was little effort to remember the Tennessee Campaign. Local citizens and veterans of the battles simply wanted to forget the horrific battles that haunted their memories. Furthermore, the United States government was not interested in saving the battlefields at Franklin and Nashville. Federal authorities, including the War Department and Congress, had grown tired of funding battlefields as national parks and could not be convinced that the two battlefields were worthy of preservation. Moreover, Southerners and Northerners remembered Franklin and Nashville in different ways, and historians mainly stressed Eastern Theater battles, failing to assign much significance to Franklin and Nashville. Throughout the 20th century, infrastructure development encroached on the battlefields and they continued to fade from public memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced trom the microfilm master~ UMI films the text directly trom the original or copy submitted~ Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be fram anytype of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken orindistinct print, colored orpoor quality illustrations. and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandarcl margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction~ ln the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upperleft.-hand ccmer and continuing tram left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. ProQuest Information and Leaming 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Secession, Sequence, and the State: South Carolina's Decision to Lead the Secession Movement in 1860 Lawrence Anderson Department ofPolitical Science McGill University, Montreal July2001 A thesis submitted to the FacultyofGraduate Studies and Research inpartial fi,dfillment orthe requirements ofthe degree ofDoctorofPhilosophy. • © Lawrence Anderson 2001 National Ubrary BmIiothèQue nationale 1+1 ofC8nada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 315 WeliaglDn SIr_ 315. rue WeIingtDn 0IawaON K1A 0N4 OI-.ON K1A0N4 c.nada c.n.da The author bas granted a non­ L'auteur a accordé me licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive pennettant à la National Library ofCanada ta Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, 10aD, distnbute or sen reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies ofthis thesis inmicroform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats.
    [Show full text]
  • Legacy & Pastwatch Institute Of
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina SCIAA Newsletter - Legacy & PastWatch Institute of 9-2020 Legacy - September 2020 South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology--University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/leg Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Military History Commons Inside... DIRECTOR’S NOTE New Battlefield Archaeology Book–– Partisans, Guerillas, and Irregulars Two New Book Chapters by SCIAA Staff RESEARCH VOL. 24, NO. 1, SEPTEMBER 2020 Artillery Ammunition from Star Fort Wateree Bug Ceramic Motif Scale Weights from Santa Elena Early Human Life on the Southeastern Coastal Plain Book Update of Southeastern Paleoamerican Survey Field Slave Quarters at Historic Brattonsville Castle Pinckney Project APPLIED RESEARCH Vietnam War-Era Training Villages at Fort Jackson Archaeological Survey at Rose Hill Ancient Weapons from the Siege of Plantation State Historic Site Ninety Six SAVANNAH RIVER By James Legg and Steve Smith ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH PROGRAM During the summer of 2020, we have been The Americans successfully employed Cemetery Survey in Jackson, South busy preparing the report for our two fire arrows in the siege of Fort Motte a few Carolina “Maymester” seasons of field work at the weeks before the siege of Ninety Six was SEAC 2019 Patty Jo Watson Award Star Fort, at Ninety Six National Historic undertaken (see Legacy December 2015), Site in Greenwood County. (See Legacy July for the fire arrow point we recovered from ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH 2018, July 2019, and the article on pages the American siege camp at Fort Motte). TRUST (ART) AND SCIAA DONORS 5-7 of this issue).
    [Show full text]
  • Gist Family of South Carolina and Its Mary­ Land .Antecedents
    The Gist Family of South Carolina and its Mary­ land .Antecedents BY WILSON GEE PRIVATELY PRINTED FOR THE AUTHOR BY JARMAN'S, INCORPORATED CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 1 9 3 4 To THE MEMORY OF MY MOTHER PREFACE Among the earliest impressions of the author of this gen­ ealogical study are those of the reverence with which he was taught to look upon the austere to kindly faces in the oil portrai~ of his Gist ancestors as they seemed from their vantage points on the walls of the room to follow his every movement about the parlor of his boyhood home. From his mother, her relatives, his father, and others of the older people of Union County and the state of South Carolina,_ he learned much of the useful and valorous services rendered by this family, some members of which in almost each gen­ eration have with varying degrees of prominence left their mark upon the pages of history in times of both peace and war. Naturally he cherished these youthful impressions concerning an American family which dates far back into the colonial days of this republic. As he has grown older, he has collected every fragment of authentic material which he could gather about them with the hope that they might be some day permanently preserved in such a volume as this. But it is correct to state that very likely this ambition would never have been realized had not his cousin, Miss Margaret Adams Gist of York, South Carolina, who for thirty-five years or more has been gathering materials on the Gist family, generously decided to turn over to him temporarily for hi~ use her rich collections of all those years.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR THOSE WHO STILL HEAR the Gunsrm by William Glenn Robertson
    FOR THOSE WHO STILL HEAR THE GUNSrM by William Glenn Robertson Dave Rmh of B&G The Armies (~ollide Bragg }~orces His Way Across (~hickamattga (~reek The failure of Gen. Braxton Bragg's bold and bring the remainder to La Fayette, Ga. (see Mills on the previous day by elements of effort to cripple the Federal XIV Corps in Pg. 51). By 8:30a.m., Bragg had decided upon Thomas J. Wood's Federal division, was to McLemore's Cove on September 11, 1863 (see the next offensive action to take. Believing that remain in contact with the Federals in its Maps, Pp. 10-ll) did not break the offensive Maj. Gen. Thomas L. Crittenden's XXI Corps front. On Armstrong's right, Brig. Gen. John spirit of either the Army of Tennessee or its might be vulnerable, he resolved to send forces Pegram was to deploy his two brigades in an commander. After a few hours of fitful rest, north from La Fayette to strike any elements arc stretching southeast toward the hamlet Bragg was again issuing orders as early as of that corps that could be found. ofVillanow, Ga., on the direct route from La seven o'clock the morning of the 12th. At that Accordingly, Lt. Gen. Leonidas Polk was Fayette to Resaca. When he learned around hour he directed Brig. Gen. Bushrod R. told to move Frank Cheatham's large five­ noon that Armstrong had broken contact with Johnson to continue shielding the army's supply brigade division ten miles north on the the Federals at Lee and Gordon's Mills, line by blocking any Federal push toward Chattanooga road to Rock Spring Church (see Bragg sternly sent him forward again.
    [Show full text]
  • Carologue Index Updated August 2016
    Month/Seaso Year Page(s) Title Author Subjects Illustrations Comments/Other n The contributions and accomplishments of Gene 1985 Jan-Feb 1 Gene Waddell Joins Getty David Molke-Hansen Photo of Gene Waddell Waddell as he leaves the SCHS Description of source 1985 Jan-Feb 2-3 Palmetto Genealogy Isabella G. Leland materials at the SCHS for genealogical research David Moltke-Hansen Is New Bio of David Moltke-Hansen, 1985 Jan-Feb 4 Susan Walker Photo of David Moltke-Hansen Director new SCHS director Description and historical Photo of the Flag of the 1985 Jan-Feb 5, 11 Moultrie Guard Flag Evokes Past Margaretta Childs significance of the Moultrie Moultrie Guard, p.5 Guard Flag Description of homes to be toured during the 1985 Photo of the Bishop Smith 1985 Jan-Feb 7 1985 Annual Meeting Tour annual meeting, ten House in Charleston properties owned by the College of Charleston The story of Santee planter, William P. Baldwin, John Bowman and Photo of John Bowman's mill 1985 Jan-Feb 8-10 Mr. Bowman's Windmill Jr. especially his connection to shaft, p.9 Jonathan Lucas, millwright Description of material Photo of bust of Julia Peterkin 1985 Jan-Feb 12 Peterkin Papers donated to the SCHS by Dr. P.I.E. Weston relating to Julia Peterkin 1832 letter of proposal from 1985 Jan-Feb 13-14 T. Bynum's "Affaire du Coeur" Donna Roper Turner Bynum, Jr. to Caroline Virginia Taliaferro Some of the upcoming College of Charleston events in celebrating the 1985 Jan-Feb 14 Bicentennial 200th anniversary of the College of Charleston Information on post cards Elizabeth Verner Postcards Post card by Artvue Post Card 1985 May-June 1 Joseph T.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Fremantle, Sir Arthur James Lyon. Three Months in the Southern States
    Fremantle, Sir Arthur James Lyon. Three Months in the Southern States: April-June 1863. New York: J. Bradburn, 1864. Left England, 7 Havana, Cuba, 7-8 Texas, 8ff Rio Grande, 9 Pass, Confederate officers, 9 General Hamilton P. Bee, 10-11, 27-28 Body of dead Mexican, 11-12 Matamoras, Brownsville, Jews, 13 Alcohol, officers, 18 Earl Van Dorn, 24 Scouting expedition, men said they scalped Indians, 24-25 Counterrevolution of Unionists in Texas, 25 Contented slaves, 25 Texas horsemanship, 26 Texas Unionist, alcohol, 26-27 Texas judge, 29-30 On the road in Texas, 31ff Salty bacon, 33 Attractive woman, Magruder’s staff, 34 John Bankhead Magruder, 34-37 Magruder spoke ill of the Puritans and well of McClellan, Peninsula campaign, 35-36 Magruder staff, singing, 36-37 Struggles in sand without food and water, mules, 38-40 Conversation with mixed race slave woman from Tennessee, 41 Water, bought lamb and beef, 42 King’s Ranch, 44 Confederate woman, Church of England, 44 San Antonio, city, missions, 52-58 Ardent Confederate Mrs. Bankhead, 55 Confederates do not expect a speedy end to the war, Lincoln, 55 John Brown song and parodies, music, 57 Soldier hanged for desertion, 58 Enforcement of conscription, 58 Tobacco, spitting, 59-60 Officer elections, 59 Carriage ride, 60 Slave values, 62 White society, 64 Texas railroad travel, 64ff Sleeping accommodations, multiple people per bed, British prejudices, 66 General Scurry, 67 Sam Houston, 68-69 Galveston, forts, N71f 1 Nathaniel P. Banks, 74 Rough looking and sounding Confederate band, music, 74-75 General
    [Show full text]
  • Carologue Index Updated February 2017
    Month/Seaso Year Page(s) Title Author Subjects Illustrations Comments/Other n The contributions and accomplishments of Gene 1985 Jan-Feb 1 Gene Waddell Joins Getty David Molke-Hansen Photo of Gene Waddell Waddell as he leaves the SCHS Description of source 1985 Jan-Feb 2-3 Palmetto Genealogy Isabella G. Leland materials at the SCHS for genealogical research David Moltke-Hansen Is New Bio of David Moltke-Hansen, 1985 Jan-Feb 4 Susan Walker Photo of David Moltke-Hansen Director new SCHS director Description and historical Photo of the Flag of the 1985 Jan-Feb 5, 11 Moultrie Guard Flag Evokes Past Margaretta Childs significance of the Moultrie Moultrie Guard, p.5 Guard Flag Description of homes to be toured during the 1985 Photo of the Bishop Smith 1985 Jan-Feb 7 1985 Annual Meeting Tour annual meeting, ten House in Charleston properties owned by the College of Charleston The story of Santee planter, William P. Baldwin, John Bowman and Photo of John Bowman's mill 1985 Jan-Feb 8-10 Mr. Bowman's Windmill Jr. especially his connection to shaft, p.9 Jonathan Lucas, millwright Description of material Photo of bust of Julia Peterkin 1985 Jan-Feb 12 Peterkin Papers donated to the SCHS by Dr. P.I.E. Weston relating to Julia Peterkin 1832 letter of proposal from 1985 Jan-Feb 13-14 T. Bynum's "Affaire du Coeur" Donna Roper Turner Bynum, Jr. to Caroline Virginia Taliaferro Some of the upcoming College of Charleston events in celebrating the 1985 Jan-Feb 14 Bicentennial 200th anniversary of the College of Charleston Information on post cards Elizabeth Verner Postcards Post card by Artvue Post Card 1985 May-June 1 Joseph T.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Sites by Clint Johnson
    Clover Lake Wylie Smyrna Filbert Fort Mill Hickory Grove York Sharon Rock Hill 97 321 Jonesville McConnells 21 72 521 176 Lockhart Pageland 215 9 Cheraw Union Lancaster Chesterfield 9 151 Chester Richburg Elgin Heath Springs 1 Jefferson Kershaw Carlisle Blackstock Great Falls 72 Woodward 321 77 Blair McBee Liberty Hill 341 215 Winnsboro 97 601 Bethune York Union Chester Monticello Lancaster Chesterfield Fairfield Kershaw Ridgeway Camden Lugof f 20 521 Boykin This brochure is a work-in-progress, and will be updated regularly. Therefore feedback and additional information on these and any other sites related to this topic in the Olde English District are welcomed. For further information, contact: Olde English District Tourism Commission 3200 Commerce Drive, Suite A Richburg, South Carolina 29729 803-789-7076 or 1-800-968-5909 • Fax: 803-789-7077 www.OldeEnglishDistrict.com email: [email protected] Printed in USA 6/12 50M army, which was trapped in Petersburg, Virginia, by Union General Ulysses S. Grant. Still, Sherman wanted to be careful. He was deep in hostile territory, hundreds of miles from supplies and any other Union forces. He had to keep the Confederates guessing what he would do next. After leaving Columbia, Sherman’s next objective was either (The following material is excerpted from the book, Touring the Raleigh or Goldsboro in northeast North Carolina. However, to keep Carolinas’ Civil War Sites by Clint Johnson. Used with permission.) Confederates in North Carolina from concentrating their forces in the northeast part of the state, he decided to “feint” directly north of Sherman’s Feint Tour Columbia in the direction of Charlotte, North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • CIVIL WAR HERITAGE TRAILS℠ Alabama April 2017 NEWSLETTER Issue No.57 Southgeorgia Carolina
    CIVIL WAR HERITAGE TRAILS℠ Alabama April 2017 NEWSLETTER Issue No.57 www.CivilWarHeritageTrails.org SouthGeorgia Carolina Samuel McGowan Along the Trails April Events Forever Faithful… Samuel McGowan Samuel McGowan was born on October 9, 1819 in Laurens, South Carolina to Irish- immigrant Presbyterian parents. After graduating from South Carolina College (University of South Carolina) in 1841 he studied law at Abbeville, South Carolina and was licensed to practice law in 1842. Continued on Page 2 Along the Trails… Samuel McGowan: Forever Faithful to South Carolina Now nearly 700 Civil War Heritage “trailblazer” signs are installed throughout Georgia along the historic driving routes of the Atlanta Campaign, March to the Sea and Jefferson Davis Heritage Trails. Continued on Page 3 Civil Events in “Along the Trails…” April Events Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina AL – Park Day Atlanta Campaign GA – Leading From the Front and March to the SC – Firing on Fort Sumter: Sea Brochures “The Opening Ball” Continued on Page 4 Follow the Civil War Heritage Trails * www.CivilWarHeritageTrails.org * Facebook * Twitter * YouTube * Pinterest CIVILCIVIL WARWAR HERITAGEHERITAGE TRAILSTRAILS PAGE PAGE 2 2 Samuel McGowan Forever Faithful to South Carolina Copyrighted, All Rights Reserved Samuel McGowan was born on October 9, 1819 in Laurens, South Carolina to Irish-immigrant Presbyterian parents. After graduating from South Carolina College (University of South Carolina) in 1841 he studied law at Abbeville, South Carolina and was licensed to practice law in 1842. Between 1842 and 1861 McGowan spent 13 years in the South Carolina General Assembly. He also served in the U.S. Army during the War with Mexico.
    [Show full text]