DOCSLIB.ORG

Order ANSERIFORMES: Duck-Like Birds Text

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Order ANSERIFORMES: Duck-Like Birds Text D .W . .5 / DY a 5D t w[ { wt Ç"" " !W5 í ÇI &'(' / b ù b a L w 5 ! ) " í "* " Ç t+ t " h " * { b ù" t* /'0/( )' 1 )&0)) Order ANSERIFORMES: Duck-like Birds This order is best placed within Galloanserimorphae after Ratitae following Knox et al. (2002). The higher taxonomy is based on Checklist Committee (1990) modified to reflect the common features of the relationships shown and / or taxonomies proposed in Madsen et al. (1988), Livezey (1989, 1990, 1991, 1996a–c, 1997a,b), Sibley & Ahlquist (1990), del Hoyo et al. (1992), McCracken et al. (1999), Sorenson et al. (1999), Donne-Goussé et al. (2002) and Callaghan & Harshman (2005). Anseriformes is taken to have three families: Anhimidae (screamers) confined to South America, Anseranatidae (magpie goose) monotypic of Australia, and Anatidae. Within Anatidae, it is traditionally considered that the whistling ducks Dendrocygna and Thalassornis are basal, and that the rest of Anatidae formed two major clades: Anserinae (swans and geese) and Anatinae (all other taxa). However, we follow Checklist Committee (1990) and Marchant & Higgins (1990), and in part Livezey (1997b), Dickinson (2003) and Callaghan & Harshman (2005), in treating shelducks and kin, sea ducks, and stiff-tailed ducks as subfamilies: Tadorninae, Merginae, and Oxyurinae respectively. To these is added the basal monotypic anseriform Stictonetta of Australia in Stictonettinae. Recent analyses, based on skeletal and plumage features resulting in a complete anseriform phylogeny (Livezey 1997b), found an association between Aythyini, Mergini, Oxyurini, Biziura and other modified diving ducks, in contrast to traditional taxonomies (e.g. Delacour & Mayr 1945, Johnsgard 1968) which had not so related these taxa. Recent DNA analyses (Madsen et al. 1988, Sibley & Ahlquist 1990, Sraml et al. 1996, Johnson & Sorenson 1999, McCracken et al. 1999, Sorenson et al. 1999, Donne-Goussé et al. 2002, McCracken & Sorenson 2005) indicated that these taxa have no close relationships to one another, and that their diving specialisations have resulted in morphological convergence that obscures phylogeny. The stiff-tailed ducks (Oxyura and allies) are considered more basal than Anatinae, following Madsen et al. (1988), Sibley et al. (1988), Sibley & Ahlquist (1990), Marchant & Higgins (1990), Sraml et al. (1996), Callaghan & Harshman (2005), Worthy & Lee (2008) and Worthy (2009), and so are placed after Dendrocygna and Anserinae. Recent genetic studies, e.g. Sraml et al. (1996) and McCracken et al. (1999), provided strong evidence that Biziura is not closely related to Oxyura, although both taxa lie outside Anatinae. Callaghan & Harshman (2005) did not allocate Biziura to a subfamily, leaving its position in the phylogeny of Anatidae as incertae sedis. Worthy (2009) found it to be a member of Oxyurinae. So, pending resolution of its higher relationships, Biziura is retained in Oxyurinae. Cereopsis is accepted as a member of Anserinae following Livezey (1989, 1997b), Marchant & Higgins (1990), Donne-Goussé et al. (2002) and Callaghan & Harshman (2005). We have not placed Cnemiornis in its own monotypic family (Cnemiornithidae), as suggested by Livezey (1989) and followed by Callaghan & Harshman (2005), because later analyses failed to support this. The shelducks and sheldgeese form a monophyletic clade in most studies (e.g. Livezey 1997a,b; Sorenson et al. 1999; Donne-Goussé et al. 2002), which we place at the subfamilial level before Anatinae, following Checklist Committee (1990), Marchant & Higgins (1990), Livezey (1997b), Dickinson (2003) and Callaghan & Harshman (2005). Livezey (1997a,b) resurrected Casarca for the unbanded shelducks, restricting Tadorna to T. tadorna and T. radjah. In this scheme the paradise shelduck would be Casarca variegata in the subgenus Pseudotadorna Kuroda, 1917 with C. tadornoides and C. cristata. Here we follow the more conservative approach of allying all shelducks in one genus, as did Kear (2005). The placement of Malacorhynchus in the anatid phylogeny is problematic because it is monotypic, at least in the recent fauna, and poorly studied: it has been included in just one genetic analysis to date. We depart from the conservative placement of Malacorhynchus early in the sequence within Anatinae (e.g. Marchant & Higgins 1990, Livezey 1997b, Dickinson 2003, Callaghan & Harshman 2005), and accept the feather protein evidence (Brush 1976), genetic evidence (Sraml et al. 1996) and morphological and behavioural evidence (Frith 1977, Olson & Feduccia 1980, Worthy & Lee 2008 and Worthy (2009), that in sum suggest it should be classified outside Anatinae and before Tadorninae. Provisionally, we place it between Anserinae and Tadorninae. Fullagar (in Kear 2005: 442) considered this taxon to be part of the old endemic component of Australia’s avifauna with no close relatives elsewhere. Merginae is placed after Tadorninae, rather than after Anatinae, or as Mergini at the end of Anatinae, to reflect the relationships shown by mtDNA studies (Sorenson et al. 1999, Donne-Goussé et al. 2002). We follow the recommendation of Worthy & Olson (2002) that Euryanas finschi is listed as the sister taxon of Chenonetta jubata within Anatinae, contra Livezey (1989, 1997b), who had Euryanas as a monotypic tribe far removed from Chenonetta. Livezey (1997b), followed by Dickinson (2003), also suggested that Hymenolaimus lies within Tadorninae, but without supporting data for that position we leave it within Anatinae following Checklist Committee (1990) and Marchant & Higgins (1990). Authorship of family-group taxa is based on Rafinesque (1815), Leach (1819), Brodkorb (1964), Bock (1994) and Olson (1995). We follow Browning & Munroe (1991) for the publication date of Reichenbach (1853). Suborder ANSERES: Swans, Geese and Ducks Family ANATIDAE Leach: Swans, Geese and Ducks Anatidae Leach, 1819: Eleventh room. In Synopsis Contents British Museum 15th Edition, London: 67 – Type genus Anas Linnaeus, 1758. Subfamily ANATINAE Leach: Ducks Ellman (1861: 7471) named two new species of teal as Anas fusca and A. mediterranea, but he did not give sufficient information to identify them unequivocally. Therefore, Anas fusca Ellman, 1861 and Anas mediterranea Ellman, 1861 are here regarded as nomina dubia. Tribe ANATINI Leach: Typical Ducks Anatidae Leach, 1819: Eleventh room. In Synopsis Contents British Museum 15th Edition, London: 67 – Type genus Anas Linnaeus, 1758. Genus Anas Linnaeus Anas Linnaeus, 1758: Syst. Nat., 10th edition 1: 122 – Type species (by subsequent designation) Anas Boschas Linnaeus = Anas platyrhynchos Linnaeus. Anassus Rafinesque, 1815: Analyse de la Nature: 72. Unnecessary nomen novum for Anas Linnaeus 1758. Spatula Boie, 1822: Isis von Oken, Heft 10: col. 564 – Type species (by monotypy) Anas clypeata Linnaeus. Rhynchaspis Stephens, 1824: in Shaw, General Zool. 12(2): 114 – Type species (by subsequent designation) Anas clypeata Linnaeus. Mareca Stephens, 1824: in Shaw, General Zool. 12(2): 130 – Type species (by subsequent designation) Mareca fistularis Stephens = Anas penelope Linnaeus. Querquedula Stephens, 1824: in Shaw, General Zool. 12(2): 142 – Type species (by tautonymy) Anas querquedula Linnaeus. Rhynchoplatus Berthold, 1827: in Latreille, Nat. Fam. Thierreich: 84 – Type species (by monotypy) Anas clypeata Linnaeus. Clypeata Lesson, 1828: Manuel d’Ornith. 2: 416 – Type species (by original designation) Anas clypeata Linnaeus. Spathulea J.D.D. Fleming, 1828: Hist. Brit. Anim. 123 – Type species (by monotypy) Anas clypeata Linnaeus. Nettion Kaup, 1829: Natürl. Syst.: 95 – Type species (by original designation) Anas crecca Linnaeus. Boschas Swainson, 1831: Journ. Royal Inst. Great Britain 2: 20 – Type species (by tautonymy) Anas Boschas Linnaeus = Anas platyrhynchos Linnaeus. Nesonetta G.R. Gray, 1844: Gen. Birds 3: 627 – Type species (by original designation) Nesonetta aucklandica G.R. Gray = Anas aucklandica (G.R. Gray). Virago Newton, 1872: Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1871 (41): 651 – Type species (by original designation) Anas punctata Gould = Anas castanea (Eyton). Elasmonetta Salvadori, 1895: Cat. Birds Brit. Mus. 27: 287 – Type species (by monotypy) Anas chlorotis G.R. Gray. Xenonetta J.H. Fleming, 1935: Occas. Papers Roy. Ontario Mus., Zool. 1: 1 – Type species (by original designation) Xenonetta nesiotis J.H. Fleming = Anas nesiotis (J.H. Fleming). All New Zealand teal taxa were regarded as distinct species by most authorities in the first half of the 20th Century. However, in a review of the Anatidae, Delacour & Mayr (1945) advocated placing A. chlorotis as a subspecies of A. aucklandica. This was not followed by Oliver (1955), but Checklist Committee (1953) took Delacour & Mayr’s suggestion a step further and included all the New Zealand teal as subspecies of Anas castanea. This arrangement was later dropped and Delacour & Mayr’s treatment was followed (Checklist Committee 1970, 1990) with the Australian birds kept specifically distinct. Re-examination of the teal complex has since found widespread support for the specific distinction of each of the New Zealand teal in such features as skeletal morphology (Livezey 1990), plumage and behaviour (Marchant & Higgins 1990), allozyme electrophoresis (Daugherty et al. 1999) and DNA studies (Johnson & Sorenson 1998, Kennedy & Spencer 2000). We follow these authors and Livezey (1997b) and Kear (2005) in reinstating each of the New Zealand teal to specific rank. Research indicates that the genetic differences between them is greater than between
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE FAMILY ANATIDAE 43 Ernst Map
    March 1945 42 THE WILSON BULLETIN Vol. 57, No. 1 Biziura L lob&, Australian Musk Duck Aberrant Species Thalassornis leuconota, African White-backed Duck Heteronetta atricapilla, Black-headed Duck 7. TRIBE MERGANETTINI. TORRENTDUCKS Merganetta armuta, Torrent Duck GENERA RECOGNIZEDBY PETERS AND SYNONYMIZEDIHERE Arctonetta= Som&eria Metopiana= Netta Asarcornis = Cairina Nesochen= Branta Casarca = Tadorna Nesonetta= Anus Chaulelasmus= Anas Nomonyx = Oxyura Chen = Anser Nyroca= Aythya Cheniscus= Nettapus Oidemia = Melanitta Chenopis= Cygnus Phil&e= Anser Cygnopsis= Anser Polysticta= Somateria Dendronessa= Aix Pseudotadorna= Tadorna Eulabeia= Anser Pteronetta= Cairina Lophodytes= Mergus Salvadorina= Anus Mareca= Anas Spatula= Anas Mergellus = Mergus GENERA RECOGNIZEDHERE BUT NOT BY PETERS Amazonetta von Boetticher (for Anus brasiliensis) Lophonetta Riley (for Anus specularioides) COMPARISONOP CHARACTERS Our studies have shown that the waterfowl can be divided into about nine groups that are fairly well defined both morphologically and biologically. In addition, there are a number of species and genera that are either intermediate between the otherwise well- defined tribes (e.g. Coscoroba) or too poorly known for a safe classi- fication (e.g. Anus specularis, Anus leucophrys, Malacorhynchus, Tachyeres) ; others show peculiarities or a combination of characters that prevent them from fitting well into any of the existing groups. Such genera as the Australian Cereopsis, Anseranas, Stictonetta, and Chenonetta could either be made the sole representatives of so many separate tribes or each could be included in the tribe with which it shares the greatest number of similarities. For the sake of con- venience we have adopted the latter course, but without forgetting that these genera are not typical representatives of the tribes with which we associate them.
    [Show full text]
  • European Red List of Birds 2015
    Mareca strepera (Gadwall) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 6 Sources of reported national population data p. 9 Species factsheet bibliography p. 17 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Mareca strepera (Gadwall) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (pairs)3 Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Albania 0-5 <1 2002-2012 poor ? ? Armenia 250-400 <1 2002-2012 medium ? ? Austria 250-350 <1 2001-2012 good 0 0 2001-2012 medium + 50-100 1980-2012 medium M.
    [Show full text]
  • Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard Papers in the Biological Sciences 2010 Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World: Index Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World: Index" (2010). Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard. 19. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans/19 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Index The following index is limited to the species of Anatidae; species of other bird families are not indexed, nor are subspecies included. However, vernacular names applied to certain subspecies that sometimes are considered full species are included, as are some generic names that are not utilized in this book but which are still sometimes applied to par­ ticular species or species groups. Complete indexing is limited to the entries that correspond to the vernacular names utilized in this book; in these cases the primary species account is indicated in italics. Other vernacular or scientific names are indexed to the section of the principal account only. Abyssinian blue-winged goose. See atratus, Cygnus, 31 Bernier teal. See Madagascan teal blue-winged goose atricapilla, Heteronetta, 365 bewickii, Cygnus, 44 acuta, Anas, 233 aucklandica, Anas, 214 Bewick swan, 38, 43, 44-47; PI.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogeny of Anseriformes Based on Mitochondrial DNA Analysis
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23 (2002) 339–356 www.academicpress.com A molecular phylogeny of anseriformes based on mitochondrial DNA analysis Carole Donne-Goussee,a Vincent Laudet,b and Catherine Haanni€ a,* a CNRS UMR 5534, Centre de Genetique Moleculaire et Cellulaire, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 16 rue Raphael Dubois, Ba^t. Mendel, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France b CNRS UMR 5665, Laboratoire de Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire, Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, 45 Allee d’Italie, 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France Received 5 June 2001; received in revised form 4 December 2001 Abstract To study the phylogenetic relationships among Anseriformes, sequences for the complete mitochondrial control region (CR) were determined from 45 waterfowl representing 24 genera, i.e., half of the existing genera. To confirm the results based on CR analysis we also analyzed representative species based on two mitochondrial protein-coding genes, cytochrome b (cytb) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2). These data allowed us to construct a robust phylogeny of the Anseriformes and to compare it with existing phylogenies based on morphological or molecular data. Chauna and Dendrocygna were identified as early offshoots of the Anseriformes. All the remaining taxa fell into two clades that correspond to the two subfamilies Anatinae and Anserinae. Within Anserinae Branta and Anser cluster together, whereas Coscoroba, Cygnus, and Cereopsis form a relatively weak clade with Cygnus diverging first. Five clades are clearly recognizable among Anatinae: (i) the Anatini with Anas and Lophonetta; (ii) the Aythyini with Aythya and Netta; (iii) the Cairinini with Cairina and Aix; (iv) the Mergini with Mergus, Bucephala, Melanitta, Callonetta, So- materia, and Clangula, and (v) the Tadornini with Tadorna, Chloephaga, and Alopochen.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically
    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
    [Show full text]
  • Eligible Species for the Junior Duck Stamp Competition
    Eligible Species for the Junior Duck Stamp Competition Your entry should feature a live portrayal featuring at least one of the species below. Mute swans, loons, grebes, coots and other such waterbirds are not permitted species. For the contest, you may do ones not found in Maine Species found in Maine ● Snow Goose, including blue phase (Anser caerulescens) ● Greater White-fronted Goose (Anser albifrons) ● Brant (Branta bernicla) ● Canada Goose (Branta canadensis) ● Wood Duck (Aix sponsa) ● Blue-winged Teal (Spatula discors) ● Northern Shoveler (Spatula clypeata) ● Gadwall (Mareca strepera) ● American Wigeon (Mareca americana) ● Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) ● American Black Duck (Anas rubripes) ● Northern Pintail (Anas acuta) ● Green-winged Teal (Anas crecca) ● Ring-necked Duck (Aythya collaris) ● Greater Scaup (Aytha marila) ● Lesser Scaup (Aythya affinis) ● King Eider (Somateria spectabilis) ● Common Eider (Somateria mollissima) ● HarleQuin Duck (Histrionicus histrionicus) Threatened Species ME ● Surf Scoter (Melanitta perspicillata) ● White-winged Scoter (Melanitta fusca) ● Black Scoter (Melanitta americana) ● Long-tailed Duck (Clangula hyemalis) ● Bufflehead (Bucephala albeola) ● Common Goldeneye (Bucephala clangula) ● Barrow's Goldeneye (Bucephala islandica) Threatened Species ME ● Hooded Merganser (Lophodytes cucullatus) ● Common Merganser (Mergus merganser) ● Red-breasted Merganser (Mergus serrator) ● Ruddy Duck (Oxyura jamaicensis) Species not found in Maine (usually) but still eligible ● Black-bellied Whistling-Duck (Dendrocygna
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Checklist
    Checklist of Birds of the National Butterfly Center Mission, Hidalgo County Texas (289 Species + 3 Forms) *indicates confirmed nesting UPDATED: September 28, 2021 Common Name (English) Scientific Name Spanish Name Order Anseriformes, Waterfowl Family Anatidae, Tree Ducks, Ducks, and Geese Black-bellied Whistling-Duck Dendrocygna autumnalis Pijije Alas Blancas Fulvous Whistling-Duck Dendrocygna bicolor Pijije Canelo Snow Goose Anser caerulescens Ganso Blanco Ross's Goose Anser rossii Ganso de Ross Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons Ganso Careto Mayor Canada Goose Branta canadensis Ganso Canadiense Mayor Muscovy Duck (Domestic type) Cairina moschata Pato Real (doméstico) Wood Duck Aix sponsa Pato Arcoíris Blue-winged Teal Spatula discors Cerceta Alas Azules Cinnamon Teal Spatula cyanoptera Cerceta Canela Northern Shoveler Spatula clypeata Pato Cucharón Norteño Gadwall Mareca strepera Pato Friso American Wigeon Mareca americana Pato Chalcuán Mexican Duck Anas (platyrhynchos) diazi Pato Mexicano Mottled Duck Anas fulvigula Pato Tejano Northern Pintail Anas acuta Pato Golondrino Green-winged Teal Anas crecca Cerceta Alas Verdes Canvasback Aythya valisineria Pato Coacoxtle Redhead Aythya americana Pato Cabeza Roja Ring-necked Duck Aythya collaris Pato Pico Anillado Lesser Scaup Aythya affinis Pato Boludo Menor Bufflehead Bucephala albeola Pato Monja Ruddy Duck Oxyura jamaicensis Pato Tepalcate Order Galliformes, Upland Game Birds Family Cracidae, Guans and Chachalacas Plain Chachalaca Ortalis vetula Chachalaca Norteña Family Odontophoridae,
    [Show full text]
  • Western Field Ornithologists September 2020 Newsletter
    Western Field Ornithologists September 2020 Newsletter Black Skimmers, Marbled Godwits, and Forster’s Terns. Imperial Beach, San Diego County. 3 September 2009. Photo by Thomas A. Blackman. Christopher Swarth, Newsletter Editor http://westernfieldornithologists.org/ What’s Inside…. Farewell from President Kurt Leuschner Welcome to New Board Members Alan Craig Remembers the Early Days of WFO Jon and Kimball on Bird Taxonomy and the NACC Western Regional Bird Highlights by Paul Lehman Steve Howell: A Big Year by Foot in Town Over-eager Nuthatches and Willing Sapsuckers Meet the WFO Board Members Awards and new WFO Leadership Kimball’s Life and Covid-time in a New Home Book reviews Student Research Field Notes and Art Announcements and News Kurt Leuschner’s President’s Farewell These past two years have been an interesting time to be the President of Western Field Ornithologists. We had one of our most successful conferences in Albuquerque, and just before the lockdown we completed a very memorable WFO field trip to Tasmania. We accomplished a lot together, and I look forward to assisting with future planning when the world opens up again – and it will! While we may not know exactly what lies ahead, we certainly won’t take anything for granted. We’re in the midst of a worldwide discourse about the serious impacts of social injustice. How the ornithological community can help improve the experiences of minorities in field ornithology continues to be on our minds as we move forward into 2021. Our new WFO Diversity and Inclusivity subcommittee has met two times already, and we will continue to discover and to implement ways to bring more under- represented groups into the world of birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Welfare Assessment for Captive Anseriformes: a Guide for Practitioners and Animal Keepers
    animals Article Welfare Assessment for Captive Anseriformes: A Guide for Practitioners and Animal Keepers Paul Rose 1,2,* and Michelle O’Brien 2 1 Centre for Research in Animal Behaviour, Psychology, Washington Singer, University of Exeter, Perry Road, Exeter EX4 4QG, UK 2 Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge Wetland Centre, Slimbridge, Gloucestershire GL2 7BT, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 May 2020; Accepted: 1 July 2020; Published: 3 July 2020 Simple Summary: Zoological collections are constantly working to find new ways of improving their standards of care for the animals they keep. Many species kept in zoos are also found in private animal collections. The knowledge gained from studying these zoo-housed populations can also benefit private animal keepers and their animals. Waterfowl (ducks, geese, and swans) are examples of species commonly kept in zoos, and in private establishments, that have received little attention when it comes to understanding their core needs in captivity. Measuring welfare (how the animal is coping with the environment that it is in) is one way of understanding whether a bird’s needs are being met by the care provided to it. This paper provides a method for measuring the welfare of waterfowl that can be applied to zoo-housed birds as well as to those in private facilities. The output of such a welfare measurement method can be used to show where animal care is good (and should be continued at a high standard) and to identify areas where animal care is not meeting the bird’s needs and hence should be altered or enhanced to be more suitable for the birds being kept.
    [Show full text]
  • Print 01/03 January 2003
    A review of the status and identification of American Wigeon in Britain & Ireland Stephen C.Votier, Andrew H. J. Harrop and Matthew Denny John Wright ABSTRACT The numbers of American Wigeons Anas americana recorded in Britain & Ireland have increased significantly since the establishment of BBRC in 1958, and records ceased to be considered by the Committee from 1st January 2002.The status and distribution of the species is analysed here, and its identification discussed.Although male American Wigeon in breeding plumage is very distinctive, the identification of other plumages is much more problematic. ecords of American Wigeon Anas ameri- only were available). From 1st January 2002, cana, previously considered a rare records of American Wigeon ceased to be Rvagrant to Britain & Ireland from North assessed by BBRC, since the criteria for its America, have increased considerably since the removal from the list of species considered had mid 1980s, and there were 462 accepted records been met: more than 150 individuals had been by the end of 2001 (Rogers 2002; P. A. Fraser in recorded in the previous decade, with at least litt; note that Irish records until the end of 2000 ten in eight of those years. With this in mind, it 2 © British Birds 96 • January 2003 • 2-22 Status and identification of American Wigeon seems timely to document the status and distri- Status and distribution bution of the species, particularly given the American Wigeon breeds throughout northern problems of separating genuine vagrant wild- North America, from Alaska to Hudson Bay, fowl from escapes. In addition, although male and south through the Prairies to the eastern American Wigeon in breeding plumage is a rel- seaboard (Cramp & Simmons 1977; Madge & atively easy bird to identify, the identification of Burn 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • American Wigeon Mareca Americana ILLINOIS RANGE
    American wigeon Mareca americana Kingdom: Animalia FEATURES Phylum: Chordata The American wigeon is 18 to 22 inches long. The Class: Aves top of the male’s head has white feathers. Both the Order: Anseriformes male and female have white belly feathers, gray head feathers with black flecks and gray-blue legs Family: Anatidae and feet. The wings are narrow, and the tail is long ILLINOIS STATUS and wedgelike. The small, light blue bill has a black tip. The male has a distinctive white patch on his common, native shoulder. A green line may be seen from the eye to the back of the head. The male has pink-brown chest feathers with black highlights. The female has red-brown body feathers with a gray wing patch. BEHAVIORS The American wigeon is a common migrant through Illinois. It sometimes winters in southern and central Illinois but usually travels to the southern United States and northern Mexico. This bird is a rare summer resident. The American wigeon lives in and around marshes, lakes, ponds, flooded fields or open fields. This duck feeds on aquatic insects and the leaves and stems of aquatic vegetation. It flies quickly and is one of the earliest ducks to migrate. It has been seen migrating through Illinois in January and February on its way north and moving south again as early as July. The call is "whee whee whew." The American wigeon nests from the north central ILLINOIS RANGE United States through Canada to Alaska. © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2020. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Courtship Activities of the Anatidae in Eastern Washington
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Ornithology Papers in the Biological Sciences 1955 Courtship Activities of the Anatidae in Eastern Washington Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciornithology Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "Courtship Activities of the Anatidae in Eastern Washington" (1955). Papers in Ornithology. 66. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciornithology/66 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Ornithology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Johnsgard in CONDOR (January-February 1955) 57(1). Copyright 1955, University of California and the Cooper Ornithological Society. Used by permission. Jan., 1955 19 COURTSHIP ACTIVITIES OF THE ANATIDAE IN EASTERN WASHINGTON By PAUL A. JOHNSGARD The many interesting and sometimes spectacular aspects of waterfowl courtship have been observed and recordedby several writers. Among the best and most complete descriptionsare those of Bent (1923, 1925), Townsend (1910, 1916), Wetmore (1920), and Hochbaum (1944). However, for the most part these are unillustrated, deal with only a few species, or are based on limited observations. In the summerof 1953 and the spring and summer of 1954 the writer did extensive field work in the Potholes Region of Grant County, Washington, gathering data for an ecological study of the birds and vegetation of that section. In the spring of 1954 he had occasion to observe epigamic activities of most species of waterfowl that are found in that region and was able roughly to delimit the periods of courtship and mating for several species.
    [Show full text]