What Civil Society After Civil War?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What Civil Society After Civil War? What civil society after civil war? A study of civil society organizations' affect on peace consolidation in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Tajikistan Sabine Freizer Ph.D. thesis final submission 15 October 2004 Social Policy Department London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London UMI Number: U615252 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615252 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 m Library Bntisrr Libiwy o ^ ^ S s T R c t : and Economic Science This dissertation seeks to explain how civil society organizations can positively affect peace consolidation based on cases of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and community based (CBOs) organizations from Bosnia-Herzegovina and Tajikistan. It aims to determine how and why civil society organizations behave as they do in post-conflict, post-communist, contexts, and assess their contribution to peace. The link between civil society and peace has been assumed in research literature, but little comparative empirical research has been carried out to explain its nature. This dissertation is an attempt to fill this gap. I describe how liberal and communal definitions of civil society are applicable to the Tajik and Bosnian cases based on a brief historical analysis. NGOs are found to be the most significant organizational representation of liberal civil society, and CBOs, especially mahallas (neighborhoods) andmjesne zajednice (local communities), of communal civil society in the postwar period. I outline key post conflict challenges, classifying them as institutional, behavioral, political-economic and rights based. I develop a series of preliminary hypotheses on civil society organizations’ possible contributions based on civil society and peace literature. These assumptions are tested through case studies of two NGOs and two CBOs. I determine how the post-conflict, post-communist, environments influenced organizations’ choices of missions, programs, linkages, structures and funding sources. I conclude that experienced and charismatic leadership, clear missions, ability to build trust, understanding of donor relations, and well-developed linkages, were essential for success. I confirm many of the assumptions regarding civil society’s potential to positively affect peace, but find some critical differences. One important conclusion is that not only inter-communal but also intra-communal organizations can support peace. 2 T a ble o f C o n t e n t s : Abstract 2 Table of contents 3 Acknowledgements 6 Acronyms 8 Introduction 10 The country case studies 12 The literature deficit 14 The thesis outline 16 Chapter 1. Civil society in Tajikistan and Bosnia-Herzegovina: Between Liberal and Communal Conceptualizations. Introduction 18 I. Rival concepts of civil society 19 II. Civil society in Tajikistan: historical evolution of a concept 28 III. Historical definition of civil society in Bosnia-Herzegovina 39 IV. General features of civil society in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Tajikistan 49 Conclusions 52 Chapter 2. Making Peace: Four Approaches to Peace Consolidation Introduction 55 I. The institution-building approach to peace consolidation 57 II. Peace consolidation as conflict resolution and behavioral change 61 III. Political economy interpretations of war and peace 66 III. Rights based approach to war and peace 71 IV. Peace consolidation in practice in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Tajikistan 76 Conclusions 90 Chapter 3: Challenges of studying civil society organizations comparatively in post­ war contexts. Introduction 92 I. Research design and conceptual framework 93 II. Organizational case study selection 98 III. Research methodology: data collection and analysis 101 IV. Opportunities and limitations of field work in post-conflict settings 108 Conclusions 172 Chapter 4. NGOs as a Form of Liberal Civil Society in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Tajikistan. Introduction 114 I Origins, missions and values of the case study NGOs 115 II. NGO programs and tactics 130 III. NGO linkages 149 IV. NGO structures and funding 159 Conclusions 172 Chapter 5. Village Organizations and Mjesne Zajednice: The Post-War Re-Emergence of Communal Civil Society in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Tajikistan. Introduction 175 I. Origins and history of local self governance and community development in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Tajikistan. 176 II. Missions and values of the case study CBOs. 182 III. Activities, tasks and tactics of the case study CBOs. 195 IV. Linkages of the case study CBOs 206 V. Structures and funding of the case study CBOs 214 Conclusions 232 Chapter 6. Civil Society Organizations’ affect on Peace Consolidation in Tajikistan and Bosnia-Herzegovina. Introduction 235 I. Civil society organizations’ affect on institution building 235 II. Civil society organizations’ affect on conflict resolution 245 III. Civil society organizations’ affect on greed and grievance 253 IV. Civil society effect on the rights-based peace project 260 Conclusion 265 Conclusion 266 Introduction 266 Civil society in post-communist, post-war contexts 267 Policy issues 272 Conclusion 274 Bibliography 276 Interviews Referenced 297 Annex 1: Sample Interview Questionnaire 300 Annex 2: Glossary 304 Map of Bosnia-Herzegovina 306 Map of Tajikistan 307 5 A cknowledgements : I am grateful to a large number of persons who assisted me in the preparation and completion of this dissertation. I am very fortunate to have had the guidance of professors who are not only remarkable for their outstanding scholarship but also for their activism in civil society. My supervisors Prof. Mary Kaldor and Dr. David Lewis provided tremendous intellectual stimulus and support. It was an honor to be one of their students. Dr. Helmut Anheier offered me a Lord Dahrendorf Scholarship, a unique opportunity to join the LSE Center for Civil Society, and valuable direction during my first 18 months as a PhD candidate. I would also like to acknowledge Prof. Gene Lyons and Prof. Anne Sa’adah at Dartmouth College who first helped me develop my research skills, taught me the value of internationalism, and encouraged me to continue with academic study. This thesis is based on case studies and thus on the vision and beliefs of the individuals who committed themselves to the organizations that I examined. I would like to acknowledge as a group those persons from Zene Zenama , Ghamkhori , the Sevarlije Board for Return/ MZ, and the Karategin Valley VOs who spent long hours with me to explain their personal stories and engagement in civil society. In addition I thank the young people of the hCa Youth Network and the Youth EcoCenter o f Tajikistan who I interviewed, and who inspired me greatly, but whose organizations I did not include in this PhD. I benefited from much support, advice and friendship in Bosnia-Herzegovina since I began conducting research there in 1993. Nuna Zvizdic showed me the power of non-violent conflict resolution and of women committed to affecting change. Damir Hadzic shared war and post-war experiences, offered knowledge and advice, and opened the doors of Sevarlije to me. Lejla Hrasnica was a supportive friend and host. Eco and Beba helped me know what it means to be part of a Bosnian community. Prof. Kamol Abdullaev introduced me to the history and courage of the Tajik people. Prof. Alla Kuvatova and Prof. Margarita Khegai first shared with me the accomplishments of 6 women in Tajikistan. I was inspired by Bahodur, Mikhail, Mavjuda, Dilorom, Malika and all the rest of the Ghamkhori staff. Mahmadali Saidov and Jodgor Faizov from MSDSP believed in the value of my research and gave me unique access to the village organizations . Olga Grigoreva, Manuchehr Kholov and Bokhtar Bakozade were tireless research partners and friends. In Uzbekistan on my trips in and out of Tajikistan, Lola Maksudova and her husband Timur shared warmth and hospitality. In Tajikistan I was hosted as a colleague by the staff of UNTOP. Ambassador Ivo Petrov provided me full access to the resources of the UN mission, and Lilia Zaharieva facilitated all my first steps, Gisella Nauk and Mr. Bian Vitunic were always there for long debates. Political advisors Rahid Abdullaev and Mukhibullo Zubaidulloev walked me through the history of the Tajik conflict and provided invaluable insights into the country’s political scene. The staff of the OSCE, my former employer in Central Asia, treated me like one of their own, assisting with the organization of meetings, sharing experiences and friendship. I especially want to thank Jamila Sharipova in Garm, Sameddin Loikov in Shartuz, Harald Jepsen and Nigina Alieva in Khojand. Many other people in Tajikistan offered my insights and assessments, including Christopher Buckley, Mark Whitton, and Sara Robinson. The unwavering support of my parents, brother Eric, and aunt Nicole encouraged me at every stage of the dissertation. I spent many long months away from my partner Ercan but his love and belief in me provided the motivation to complete this PhD. Friends Paola Grenier
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report
    FUNDED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION IMPLEMENTED BY THE UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME With financial support from the Russian Federation ANNUAL REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS OF THE PROJECT “LIVELIHOOD IMPROVEMENT OF RURAL POPULATION IN 9 DISTRICTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN” FROM JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2017 Dushanbe 2017 1 Russian Federation-UNDP Trust Fund for Development (TFD) Project Annual Narrative and Financial Progress Report for January 1 – December 31, 2017 Project title: "Livelihood Improvement of Rural Population in 9 districts of the Republic of Tajikistan" Project ID: 00092014 Implementing partner: United Nations Development Programme, Tajikistan Project budget: Total: 6,700,000 USD TFD: Government of the Russian Federation: 6,700,000 USD Project start and end date: November 2014 – December 2017 Period covered in this report: 1st January to 31st December 2017 Date of the last Project Board 17th January 2017 meeting: SDGs supported by the project: 1, 2, 5, 8, 9, 10, 12 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Please provide a short summary of the results, highlighting one or two main achievements during the period covered by the report. Outline main challenges, risks and mitigation measures. The project "Livelihood Improvement of Rural Population in 9 districts of the Republic of Tajikistan", is funded by the Government of the Russian Federation, and implemented by UNDP Communities’ Program in the Republic of Tajikistan through its regional offices. Project target areas are Isfara, Istaravshan, Ayni, Penjikent in Sughd region; Vose and Temurmalik in Khatlon region; Rasht, Tojikobod and Lakhsh (Jirgatal) in the Districts of Republican Subordination (DRS). The main objective of the project is to ensure sustainable local economic development of the target districts of Tajikistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Aga Khan Foundation, Tajikistan
    Aga Khan Foundation, Tajikistan Annual Report 2020 Content Introduction Introduction .......................................................... 3 The Aga Khan Development Network (AKDN) is a group of 10 private, non-denominational development AKF in Tajikistan ...................................................... 4 agencies that work collectively to help communities, primarily in the poorest parts of Asia and Africa, Geographic Coverage ................................................. 6 become self-reliant and improve their quality of life. AKDN agencies conduct their programmes without Civil Society .......................................................... 8 regard to faith or origin and have over five decades Economic Inclusion ................................................... 14 of experience supporting integrated economic, social, and cultural development. A central feature of AKDN’s Agriculture and Food Security .......................................... 16 approach is that successful development occurs when a continuum of development activities offers people Health and Nutrition ................................................... 20 in a given area not only a rise in income, but a broad, sustained improvement in the overall quality of life. Early Childhood Development .......................................... 24 The Aga Khan Foundation (AKF) brings together Education ............................................................ 28 human, financial and technical resources to address some of the challenges faced by the poorest
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Needs Assessment 2015 Warm Weather-Induced Mudflows and Flooding
    Recovery Needs Assessment 2015 Warm Weather-Induced Mudflows and Flooding Focus Humanitarian Assistance Developed by the Disaster Risk Management Program, UNDP Tajikistan for REACT Tajikistan December 2015 Recovery Needs Assessment 2015 Mudflows and Flooding - 1 Contents Disaster-Affected Locations……………………………………………………………..2 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 4 2. Purpose and Process ......................................................................................... 5 3. Disaster Background .......................................................................................... 5 4. Recovery Overview at the Time of the Assessment ........................................... 6 5. Current and Outstanding Needs ......................................................................... 7 5.1. Overview ..................................................................................................... 7 5.2. Damage and Immediate Recovery Needs ................................................. 13 Table 1 - Recovery Needs Overview ....................................................................... 13 5.2.1. Rasht District, Direct Rule Districts (DRD) .......................................... 16 5.2.2. Tojikobod District (DRD)..................................................................... 16 5.2.3. Shughnan District, Gorno Badakhshan Autonomous Oblast (GBAO) . 17 5.2.4. Ishkashim District, GBAO ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development Programs for Poverty Alleviation: Comparative
    DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS FOR POVERTY ALLEVIATION: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MICROFINANCE PROGRAM IN TWO AREAS OF TAJIKISTAN A thesis presented to the faculty of the Center for International Studies of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Ravshan Grezov June 2008 2 This thesis titled DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS FOR POVERTY ALLEVIATION: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MICROFINANCE PROGRAM IN TWO AREAS OF TAJIKISTAN by RAVSHAN GREZOV has been approved for the Center for International Studies by ________________________________ Ann R. Tickamyer Professor of Sociology _________________________________ Jieli Li Director, International Development Studies _________________________________ Drew McDaniel Interim Director, Center for International Studies 3 Abstract GREZOV, RAVSHAN, M.A., June 2008, International Development Studies DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS FOR POVERTY ALLEVIATION: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MICROFINANCE PROGRAM IN TWO AREAS OF TAJIKISTAN (87 pp.) Director of Thesis: Ann R. Tickamyer This study analyzes the macro- and micro-level development programs for poverty alleviation in the Republic of Tajikistan. At the macro-level, this study examines the International Monetary Fund's macroeconomic stabilization programs and the World Bank's structural adjustment programs in collaboration with the Government of Tajikistan to highlight the challenges that the International Financial Institutions face in building sound economic development. At the micro-level, it analyzes a case of the UNDP program on microfinance to see if there is a statistically significant correlation between micro-loans and improved livelihoods. This research shows that poor governance and high corruption are widespread at the macro-level and thus policies should take a different approach through building strong capacities of local institutions and politicians. At the micro-level, however, the study concludes that microfinance is a more efficient and effective way to reach and empower the poor.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report April 2007
    JFPR Grant No. 9078-TAJ Community-based Rural Road Maintenance Project Baseline Survey and Poverty Impact Assessment Report Draft Final Report April 2007 Gregory R. Gajewski, Ph.D. Poverty Impact Specialist and Principal in Charge Project Implementation Unit Ministry of Transport Republic of Tajikistan The Louis Berger Group, Inc. THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS / ABBREVIATIONS / TAJIK WORDS ...........................................................................4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................................5 KEY FINDINGS ..........................................................................................................................................................6 1. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................8 1.1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................................8 1.2. OBJECTIVE OF BASELINE SURVEY AND POVERTY IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT..........................................9 1.2.1. Unique Feature – Development Impact Study with a Control Group ..................................................9 2. PRIMARY DATA COLLECTION ...................................................................................................................9 2.1. DATA/INFORMATION COLLECTION
    [Show full text]
  • WFP Tajikistan Country Brief Cooperation and Development (SDC) and Private Donors (Japan July 2021 Association for WFP)
    WFP Tajikistan In Numbers Country Brief 49% 51% July 2021 14,369 people assisted in July 2021 June 2019 19 mt of food assistance distributed USD 88,818 cash-based transfers made - Operational Context Operational Updates Tajikistan is a landlocked, low-income and food-deficit • In July, the United Nations World Food Programme country. The mountainous landscape confines arable land (WFP) and the Ministry of Education and Science of to just seven percent of the country’s surface and poses Tajikistan signed a memorandum of understanding enormous food security challenges during the winter (MoU) for collaboration on the development of a period. The country is the poorest in the Commonwealth of sustainable National School Feeding Programme in Independent States, with 27.4 percent of the population the country. The MoU is aimed at improving the living in poverty and 11.8 percent living in extreme poverty collaboration to further strengthen efforts towards a (Tajikistan Agency of Statistics). sustainable programme, particularly establishing a In Tajikistan, despite significant improvements in recent school feeding centre under the Ministry of Education years, malnutrition rates remain high. WFP is contributing to and Science of Tajikistan. This is the first MoU the Government’s progress on SDG 2, by providing access to between WFP and the Ministry of Education and appropriate nutritional support and health care, promoting Science of the Republic of Tajikistan to improve the school feeding, building resilience to the impacts of climate School Feeding Programme in the country. School change, and ensuring preparedness for recurring natural feeding remains among priority areas of the National disasters.
    [Show full text]
  • Wfp255696.Pdf
    Summary of Findings, Methods, and Next Steps Key Findings and Issues Overall, the food security situation was analyzed in 13 livelihood zones for September–December 2012. About 870,277 people in 12 livelihood zones is classified in Phase 3- Crisis. Another 2,381,754 people are classified in Phase 2- Stressed and 2,055,402 in Phase 1- Minimal. In general, the food security status of analyzed zones has relatively improved in the reporting months compared to the previous year thanks to increased remittances received, good rainfall and good cereal production reaching 1.2 million tons, by end 2012, by 12 percent higher than in last season. The availability of water and pasture has also increased in some parts of the country, leading to improvement in livestock productivity and value. Remittances also played a major role in many household’ livelihoods and became the main source of income to meet their daily basic needs. The inflow of remittances in 2012 peaked at more than 3.5 billion USD, surpassing the 2011 record of 3.0 billion USD and accounting for almost half of the country’s GDP. Despite above facts that led to recovery from last year’s prolong and extreme cold and in improvement of overall situation, the food insecure are not able to benefit from it due to low purchasing capacity, fewer harvest and low livestock asset holding. Several shocks, particularly high food fuel prices, lack of drinking and irrigation water in many areas, unavailability or high cost of fertilizers, and animal diseases, have contributed to acute food insecurity (stressed or crisis) for thousands of people.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity in Tajikistan
    LIVELIHOODS ά͸Ͳ͜ͲG ͞΄ͫΕ΋͟ ACTIVITY IN TAJIKISTAN A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK (FEWS NET) January 2011 LIVELIHOODS ά͸Ͳ͜ͲG ͞΄ͫΕ΋͟ ACTIVITY IN TAJIKISTAN A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK (FEWS NET) January 2011 Α·͋ ̯Ϣχ·Ϊιν͛ ϭΊ͋Ϯν ͋ϳζι͋νν͇͋ ΊΣ χ·Ίν ζϢ̼ΜΊ̯̽χΊΪΣ ͇Ϊ ΣΪχ Σ͋̽͋νν̯ιΊΜϴ ι͕͋Μ͋̽χ χ·͋ ϭΊ͋Ϯν Ϊ͕ χ·͋ United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. 1 Contents Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 3 National Livelihood Zone Map and Seasonal Calendar ................................................................................ 4 Livelihood Zone 1: Eastern Pamir Plateau Livestock Zone ............................................................................ 1 Livelihood Zone 2: Western Pamir Valley Migratory Work Zone ................................................................. 3 Livelihood Zone 3: Western Pamir Irrigated Agriculture Zone .................................................................... 5 Livelihood Zone 4: Rasht Valley Irrigated Potato Zone ................................................................................. 7 Livelihood Zone 5: Khatlon Mountain Agro-Pastoral Zone ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agreed by Government of Tajikistan: Agreed by UNDP
    United Nations Development Programme Country: Tajikistan UNDP-GEF Full Size Project (FSP) PROJECT DOCUMENT Project Title: Technology Transfer and Market Development for Small-Hydropower in Tajikistan UNDAF Outcome(s): Water, sustainable environment and energy. Expected CP Outcome(s): Outcome 6: Improved environmental protection, sustainable natural resources management, and increased access to alternative renewable energy. Expected CPAP Output (s): Output 6.2: Alternative renewable technologies including biogas, hydro, and solar power are demonstrated, understood, and widely used. Favorable policy and legal framework are established and contribute to private sector development. assist in the implementation of policies, legislation and regulations that improve market conditions for renewable energy development; demonstrate sustainable delivery models and financing mechanisms to encourage small‐scale renewable energy projects (and improve social infrastructure) and support project implementation; develop viable end‐use applications of renewable energy; and Conduct training on proper management of renewable energy systems (e.g. tariff collection) to strengthen local ownership and sustainability. Executing Entity/Implementing Partner: UNDP Tajikistan Implementing Entity/Responsible Partners: Ministry of Industry and Energy Brief Description: The objective of this project is to significantly accelerate the development of small-scale hydropower (SHP) generation in Tajikistan by removing barriers through enabling legal and regulatory framework, capacity building and developing sustainable delivery models, thus substantially avoiding the use of conventional biomass and fossil fuels for power and other energy needs. The project is expected to generate global benefits in directly avoiding greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of almost 273 kilotons of CO2 due to preparation of SHP plants (over the lifetime of a SHP of 20 years) and almost 819-4,952 ktCO2 in indirect emission reductions.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Monitoring Report Loan 2313-TAJ: Rural
    Environmental Monitoring Report October 2013 Loan 2313-TAJ: Rural Development Project INFRASTRUCTURE SUBPROJECTS ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT March – September 2013 Rural Development Project - Management Unit, Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Tajikistan ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank ALMGC Committee (ex Agency) for Land Management, Geodesy and Cartography CACILM Central Asian Initiative for Land Management CBO Community Based Organization CIS Community of Independent States EA Executing Agency GEF Global Environmental Facility GoT Government of Tajikistan HR Human Resources IA Implementing Agency IEE Initial Environmental Examination LPDP Livestock and Pasture Development Project (IFAD) MoA Ministry of Agriculture M & E Monitoring and Evaluation NGO Non Governmental Organization PMU Project Management Unit PPMS Project Performance Monitoring System RDP Rural Development Project RRP Report and Recommendations of the President of ADB SES Sanitary and Epidemic Station SLM Sustainable Land Management component (= Contract 3) TA Technical Assistance TJS Tajik Somoni TL Team Leader TORs Terms of Reference UN United Nations USD United States Dollar WB World Bank WUA Water Users Association 1 CONTENTS PROJECT SYNOPSIS I. INTRODUCTION II. STATUS OF INFRASTRUCTURE SUBPROJECTS 1. Commissioned infrastructures 2. Sub projects under construction 3. Sub projects awarded and launching works 4. Sub projects tendered and expecting ADB approval on awarding 5. Sub projects implementation schedule III. SCHEDULE OF INTERVENTIONS OF THE
    [Show full text]
  • Partoev K., Sulangov M., Melikov K., Jumakhmadov A. LO L
    Partoev K., Sulangov M., Melikov K., Jumakhmadov A. LOCAL AGRO BIODIVERSITY AND TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE IN AGRICULTURE NEED TO BE PRESERVED LOCAL AGRO BIODIVERSITY AND TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE NEED TO BE PRESERVED UDK: 40.3+41+42.3 Dedicated to the 20th Independent of Republic of Tajikistan P-29 Authors: Kurbonali Partoev – senior staff scientist, candidate of agricultural science Makhmadzamon Sulangov – senior staff scientist Kurbonali Melikov - scientific associate, researcher Asomiddin Jumakhmadov – agronomist – researcher. Findings of investigation made by the staff members of the Institute of botany, plant physiology and genetics of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tajikistan, the Institute of gardening and vegetable growing of the Academy of agricultural sciences of the Republic of Tajikistan and Public Organization “Khamkori Bakhri Tarakkiyet” (“Cooperation for Development”) at cooperation with Ministry of Agriculture Republic of Tajikistan in 2007 – 2010 are collected in this book. Research on discovering and description of valuable local varieties of fruit, grain and feed crops as the main agro biodiversity component in Tajikistan was carried out in the Hissar, Rasht, Zarafshan, Istravshan and Vakhsh valleys of Tajikistan under The Christensen Fund sponsorship. For this purpose, we had to visit more than 50 villages, 30 jamoats and 18 districts of the republic, to meet and interview over 1000 farmers, women, local residents and experts on traditional rural knowledge. The most important are the results that show the preservation degree of valuable local varieties of agricultural crops and agro biodiversity as well as the ways of their preserving in the countryside as a genetic material for selection and a local resource for food security in future.
    [Show full text]
  • Руйхати Бонкхо Ва Филиалхои Онхо List of the Banks and Their Branches
    Руйхати бонкхо ва филиалхои онхо List of the banks and their branches Саридора Номи Бонк Bank Ҷойгиршавӣ № Main/Филиал name Location Branch Саридора Ҷ СК “Агроинвестбонк” шаҳри Душанбе ноҳияи Сино хиёбони С.Шерозӣ, 21 1 Main OJSC "Agroinvestbank" Dushanbe city Sino district S.Sherozi avenue, 21 Филиал ҶСК “Агроинвестбонк” шаҳри Душанбе ноҳияи Фирдавсӣ хиёбони Н.Қарабоев, 2 Branch OJSC "Agroinvestbank" Dushanbe city Firdavsi district N.Karaboev avenue , 118 Филиал ҶСК “Агроинвестбонк” шаҳри Душанбе ноҳияи И.Сомонӣ к ӯчаи Пушкин, 40/1 3 Branch OJSC "Agroinvestbank" Dushanbe city I.Somoni district 40/1, Pushkin street Филиал ҶСК “Агроинвестбонк” шаҳри Душанбе ноҳияи Шоҳмансур хиёбони Рӯдакӣ 1а 4 Branch OJSC "Agroinvestbank" Dushanbe city Shohmansur district 1а, Rudaki avenue Филиал ҶСК “Агроинвестбонк” шаҳри Душанбе ноҳияи Шоҳмансур улица Бехзод, 2 5 Branch OJSC "Agroinvestbank" Dushanbe city Shohmansur district 2, Bekhzod str. Филиал ҶСК “Агроинвестбонк” шаҳри Душанбе ноҳияи Сино улица дж. Расулов, 10 6 Branch OJSC "Agroinvestbank" Dushanbe city Sino district 10, J.Rasulov str. НТҶ Филиал ҶСК “Агроинвестбонк” ноҳияи Ёвон улица улица Мирзоев, 10 7 Districts of Republican Branch OJSC "Agroinvestbank" Yovon district 10, Mirzoev str. subordination НТҶ Филиал ҶСК “Агроинвестбонк” шаҳри Ҳисор улица Ф. Абдуллоев, 25 8 Districts of Republican Branch OJSC "Agroinvestbank" Hisor city 25, F.Abdulloev str. subordination НТҶ Филиал ҶСК “Агроинвестбонк” ноҳияи Тоҷикобод поселок Тоджикобод, улица И. Сомони, 7 9 Districts of Republican Branch OJSC "Agroinvestbank" Tojikobod district 7, I.Somoni str., Tojikobod township subordination НТҶ Филиал ҶСК “Агроинвестбонк” ноҳияи Рӯдакӣ поселок Сомониён, улица Турдиев, 17 10 Districts of Republican Branch OJSC "Agroinvestbank" Rudaki district 17,Turdiev str., Somoniyon township subordination НТҶ Филиал ҶСК “Агроинвестбонк” шаҳри Ваҳдат улица Тугдона, 31 11 Districts of Republican Branch OJSC "Agroinvestbank" Vahdat city 31, Tugdona str.
    [Show full text]