DOCSLIB.ORG

Report Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report Template ENERGY RECOVERY FACILITY KINGSWOOD, CANNOCK AIR QUALITY – TECHNICAL APPENDIX 6/1 ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION MODELLING SLR Ref: 402.0034.00320 July 2010 SLR Ref: 402.0034.00320 SLR Biffa Waste Services Limited i 402.0034.00320 Kingswood ERF: Technical Appendix 6/1 July 2010 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Scope ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Structure of Report ........................................................................................... 1 2.0 POLICY, LEGISLATION AND RELEVANT GUIDANCE .............................................. 2 2.1 Ambient Air Quality .......................................................................................... 2 2.2 Environmental Permitting Regulations ........................................................... 4 2.3 Regulation of Industrial Processes ................................................................. 6 2.4 Impacts on Sensitive Ecosystems ................................................................... 7 3.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY.............................................................................. 10 3.1 Dispersion Modelling ...................................................................................... 10 3.2 Assessment of Impacts on Human Receptors ............................................. 11 3.3 Assessment of Impacts on Vegetation and Ecosystems ............................. 11 4.0 BASELINE ENVIRONMENT ...................................................................................... 14 4.1 Site Location ................................................................................................... 14 4.2 Existing Local Sources .................................................................................. 14 4.3 Local Air Quality Management ....................................................................... 15 4.4 Background Levels and Predictions ............................................................. 16 4.5 Baseline Monitoring ........................................................................................ 19 4.6 Summary of Applied Background Concentrations ....................................... 21 4.7 Sensitive Receptors: Human ......................................................................... 22 4.8 Sensitive Receptors: Ecological .................................................................... 22 4.9 Meteorological Conditions ............................................................................. 25 4.10 Topography ..................................................................................................... 26 5.0 QUANTIFICATION OF EMISSIONS TO ATMOSPHERE .......................................... 27 5.1 Sources of Emission ...................................................................................... 27 5.2 Concentration of Emissions .......................................................................... 27 5.3 Process Conditions ........................................................................................ 28 5.4 Applied Emission Rates ................................................................................. 29 5.5 Dispersion Model Set-up ................................................................................ 29 6.0 PREDICTION OF IMPACTS ...................................................................................... 33 6.1 Predicted Short-term Impacts ........................................................................ 33 6.2 Predicted Long-term Impacts......................................................................... 35 6.3 Results –Sensitive Ecosystems ..................................................................... 37 6.4 Plume Visibility ............................................................................................... 40 7.0 DISPERSION MODEL SENSITIVITY ......................................................................... 41 7.1 Stack Height Variation .................................................................................... 41 7.2 Atmospheric Chemistry.................................................................................. 42 7.3 Typical MSW ERF Emissions ......................................................................... 42 7.4 Accident Scenarios (Abnormal Events) ........................................................ 43 7.5 Annual Operating Hours ................................................................................. 47 7.6 Assessment of Model Sensitivities ............................................................... 47 8.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ........................................................................................... 49 8.1 Four Ashes (W2R) EfW ................................................................................... 49 8.2 Poplars AD Facility ......................................................................................... 50 8.3 Poplars LFG Utilisation Plant ......................................................................... 51 8.4 Road Traffic: Cumulative Impacts ................................................................. 52 SLR Biffa Waste Services Limited ii 402.0034.00320 Kingswood ERF: Technical Appendix 6/1 July 2010 TABLES Table 2-1 UKAQS Air Quality Standards (Human Health) ................................................ 2 Table 2-2 Additional Air Quality ‘Target Values’ ............................................................... 3 Table 2-3 WID Emission Limit Values ................................................................................ 5 Table 2-4 Relevant EALs (µg/m3) ........................................................................................ 6 Table 2-5 Critical Levels For The Protection Of Vegetation And Ecosystems ................ 7 Table 3-1 Applied Deposition Velocities .......................................................................... 12 Table 3-2 Applied Deposition Conversion Factors ......................................................... 12 Table 3-3 Applied Acidification Conversion Factors ...................................................... 12 Table 4-1 Existing Local Emissions within surrounding 1km grid squares of the Proposed Development (2007) ........................................................................ 14 3 Table 4-2 Automatic Monitoring Data: Annual Mean (µg/m ) ......................................... 16 3 Table 4-3 Automatic Monitoring Data: Annual Mean (µg/m ) ......................................... 16 Table 4-4 17 3 Table 4-5 Heavy Metals Monitoring Data Walsall Centre (annual average g/m ) ........ 18 3 Table 4-6 Annual Mean Concentrations of HCl (µg/m ) at Sutton Bonington ............... 18 Table 4-7 Monitoring Calendar for Year 2009 ................................................................. 19 Table 4-8 Location of Diffusion Tubes for Baseline Assessment .................................. 19 3 Table 4-9 NO2 Diffusion Tube Monitoring Results (µg/m ) ............................................. 20 Table 4-10 Baseline Diffusion Tube Monitoring Results (µg/m3) ................................... 20 Table 4-11 Applied Background Concentrations ............................................................ 21 Table 4-12 Designated Sites within Zone of Influence of the Study Area ..................... 22 Table 4-13 Existing Levels of Deposition at Ecological Receptors (source: APIS) ...... 23 Table 4-14 24 Table 4-15 26 Table 5-1 Emission Characteristics from Stack .............................................................. 28 Table 5-2 Emission Rates from Kingswood ERF (per line) ............................................ 29 Table 5-3 Met Data Preparation – Applied Surface Characteristics ............................... 31 Table 6-1 Predicted Short-term Process Contributions PC (µg/m3) ............................... 33 Table 6-2 Predicted Short-term Predicted Environmental Concentrations (PEC) (µg/m3) .......................................................................................................................... 35 3 Table 6-3 Predicted Long-term Process Contributions (µg/m ) ..................................... 35 3 Table 6-4 Predicted Long-term Predicted Environmental Concentrations (µg/m ) ...... 36 3 Table 6-5 Predicted Nitrogen Oxide Impacts on Sensitive Ecosystems (µg/m ) .......... 37 3 Table 6-6 Predicted Sulphur Dioxide Impacts on Sensitive Ecosystems (µg/m ) ......... 37 3 Table 6-7 Predicted Ammonia Impacts on Sensitive Ecosystems (µg/m ) .................... 38 3 Table 6-8 Predicted HF Impacts on Sensitive Ecosystems (µg/m ) ............................... 38 Table 6-9 Predicted Acid Deposition on Sensitive Ecosystems (kgeq/hr/yr) ................. 38 Table 6-10 Predicted Nitrogen Deposition on Sensitive Ecosystems (kg/hr/yr) ........... 39 Table 7-1 Typical ERF Emission Rates ............................................................................ 42 Table 7-2 Plausible Abnormal Emissions from an ERF .................................................. 45 Table 7-3 Short-term Impacts Resulting from Plausible Abnormal Emissions (µg/m3) 45 Table 7-4 Long-term Impacts Resulting from Plausible Abnormal Emissions (µg/m3) 46 Table 7-5 Results of Model Sensitivity Assessment ....................................................... 47 Table 8-1 Emissions from the W2R Facility....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Walsall Tour Notes 1993
    Walsall Tour Notes 1993 The West Midlands Group organised a walk that followed the Wyrley & Essington Canal from Walsall to Sneyd and used the newly re-opened passenger route from Bloxwich North to visit Churchbridge Railway interchange basin and the now demolished South Staffordshire Railway House near there, These notes reflect a time prior to the railway privatisation, when Regional Railways had charge of local services and Intercity operated the express trains in this region. Members from the East Midlands, West Midlands and North West groups attended. Lunch was arranged at the public house built beside the infilled locks at Sneyd. Tour leader ; Ray Shill. Index 2 – 18 Morning Walk 19 – 30 Afternoon Walk 31 – 34 Images of Walk Area 1 2 3 The walk begins at Walsall Station and the group assembles in the Saddler Centre. It is a modern brick and concrete structure, a product of 1970's architecture. Many will probably remember the old station, its wooden circular booking hall and frontage to Park Street. Some may even recall the transition, in 1978, when the old booking office was demolished to leave a gaping hole above the tracks below. In this period the station entrance was effected from Station Street across a temporary footbridge to an equally temporary booking office on the island platform. Then there was only one passenger service. Electric units, usually 304s, trundled from New Street to Walsall and back. Their diagram's might have involved exotic places such as Bletchley or Manchester, but for Walsall folk the train only went to Birmingham. If they wanted anywhere else it was simply change at Brummagen.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannock Extension Canal Appropriate Assessment Screening Report
    Habitats Regulations Assessment of Cannock Chase Core Strategy Task 1: Screening For Black Country Local Authorities and Cannock Chase District Council October 2007 thinking beyond construction Habitats Regulations Assessment of Cannock Chase Core Strategy Task 1: Screening For Black Country Local Authorities and Cannock Chase District Council October 2007 Reference: E11816 Issue Prepared by Checked by Verified by Issue 1 October 2007 Gail Quartly-Bishop Penny Ward Geoff Richardson Senior Ecologist Principal Ecologist Director White Young Green Environmental, Regatta House, Clippers Quay, Salford Quays, Manchester M50 3XP Telephone 0161 872 3223, Facsimile 0161 872 3193, e–mail: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1 1.1 Cannock Chase Core Strategy 1 1.1.1 Purpose 1 1.1.2 Description 1 1.2 Habitats Regulations Assessment Process 1 1.2.1 Requirement for Habitats Regulations Assessment 1 1.2.2 Habitats Regulations Assessment at the Plan Level 2 1.2.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment Guidance 2 1.2.4 Habitats Regulations Assessment Stages 2 1.3 Relationship with Habitats Regulations Assessment of the West Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy 3 1.4 Information used in the Assessment 3 1.5 Professional judgment 3 1.6 Purpose and scope of this report 4 2 NATURA 2000 SITES 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Natura 2000 sites considered in this report 5 2.3 Evidence gathering 5 3 SCREENING METHODOLOGY FOR LIKELY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS 7 3.1 Introduction 7 3.2 Review of the Habitats Regulations Assessments of the Phase 1 and
    [Show full text]
  • PCF 114 Environmental Assessment Report
    PCF 114 Environmental Assessment Report SGAR5 – Development Phase Birmingham Box Phase 3 Managed Motorways M6 Junctions 5 – 8 PCF 114 Environmental Assessment Report Document Control Document Title PCF 114 Environmental Assessment Report Author Rosemary Armah Owner Rob Edwards Distribution Rob Edwards (MP Project Manager) Asad Khan (MP Assistant Project Manager) BB3 Managed Motorways Mailbox All present in the Reviewer List Document Status Final Issue for Approval Record of Issue Version Status Author Date Checked Date Authorised Date 1.0 Issue – For R. Armah 26/08/11 A. Dawes & 26/08/11 J McNulty 02/09/11 Consultation A. Thornhill 2.0 Issue – For R. Armah 27/10/11 A. Thornhill 27/10/11 J McNulty 15/11/11 Consultation 3.0 Final Issue R. Armah 27/10/11 A. Thornhill 17/11/11 M Heaton 17/11/11 Reviewer List Name Role Philip Barnett DfT Sponsor Matt Winter NetServ Technical Services - Regional Environmental Advisor Approvals Name Signature Title Date of Version Issue David Grant SRO Appendix A - M6BBPh3MM 114 Environmental Assessment Report 20111117.doc Birmingham Box Phase 3 Managed Motorway Page 2 of 221 PCF 114 Environmental Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Overview ........................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Need for an Environmental Assessment ...................................................... 10 1.3 Purpose of the Study ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 0017FEASIBILITY REPORT FINAL ISSUE 02 - 2006-08-17.DOC Issue 02 6 September 2006 REP001
    British Waterways Hatherton Canal Restoration Feasibility Report Black British Waterways Hatherton Canal Restoration Final Feasibility Report September 2006 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Ove Arup & Partners Ltd The Arup Campus, Blythe Gate, Blythe Valley Park, Solihull, West Midlands. B90 8AE Tel +44 (0)121 213 3000 Fax +44 (0)121 213 3001 www.arup.com Job number 115356-36 British Waterways Hatherton Canal Restoration Feasibility Report CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 STUDY METHODOLOGY 1 2.1 Tier 1 Scope 1 2.2 Tier 2 Scope 1 2.3 Items Excluded from the Clients Brief 2 2.4 Information Available for Study 2 3 SITE LOCATION AND CANAL ROUTING 2 3.1 Site Location 2 3.2 Canal Routing and Structures 3 3.3 Calf Heath to the Straight Mile 4 3.4 The Straight Mile 5 3.5 The M6 Crossing 6 3.6 Oak Lane Bridge 8 3.7 Saredon Mill Bridge 9 3.8 Cross Bridge 9 3.9 Cats Bridge 11 3.10 Meadow Lock 12 3.11 Bridge 8 (Roman Way Hotel) 12 3.12 Wedges Mills and Wolverhampton Road (A4601) 13 3.13 Wedges Mills to Severn Trent Water Lagoons 14 3.14 Severn Trent Water (STW) Lagoons 14 3.15 Severn Trent Water Lagoons to Walkmill Lane Bridge 16 3.16 Walkmill Lane Bridge 16 3.17 Walkmill Lane Bridge to the M6 Toll Crossing 16 3.18 M6 Toll to the Walsall to Rugeley Railway Line 17 3.19 Walsall to Rugeley Railway Line Crossing 17 3.20 Walsall - Rugeley Railway Line to the David Suchet Tunnel 17 3.21 David Suchet Tunnel – Culvert 155 20 3.22 Streetway Farm 20 3.23 Wash Brook – A5 Crossing.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannock Chase Council
    CANNOCK CHASE COUNCIL CANNOCK CHASE LOCAL PLAN (Part 2) – SITE ALLOCATIONS HATHERTON CANAL RESTORATION DUTY TO CO-OPERATE MEETING WEDNESDAY 14 JUNE 2017, 2.00pm, WESTERN SPRINGS RM, CANNOCK PRESENT: John Morgan – Planning Policy, CCDC (Chair) Clare Eggington – Planning Policy Manager, CCDC Matthew Hardy – Planning Policy, CCDC Paul Rigby – Planning Policy, South Staffordshire Council Sarah Matile – Planning Policy, Lichfield DC Heidi Hollins – Planning Policy, Lichfield DC Mike Smith – Planning Policy Manager, Walsall Council Antony Muller – Natural England Ian Dickinson – Canal & River Trust Bob Williams – LHCRT Peter Buck – LHCRT Luke Walker - LHCRT APOLOGIES: Jane Field – Environment Agency 1. Introduction 1.1 CCDC welcomed everybody to the meeting. As the Local Plan (Part 2) Site Allocations consultations ended on 27 March, it was considered appropriate to meet to discuss issues raised and clarify any outstanding matters. 2. Duty to co-operate 2.2 CCDC explained that under the Localism Act, local authorities are required to engage constructively, actively and on an ongoing basis as part of their development plan preparation process on strategic and cross boundary issues. This meeting had therefore been convened under the ‘duty to co-operate’ requirement. 3. Cannock Chase Local Plan (Part 2) Site Allocations 3.1 CCDC had circulated the responses received on the recent Site Allocations, 1 Issues and Options consultation, as they related to the Hatherton Canal. It was proposed to submit the plan for Examination in early 2018. Following adoption of Part 2, a review of the Local Plan as a whole would be triggered to address a series of issues which it would not be possible to deal with at this stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruise Log V2 Final
    BCNS MARATHON CHALLENGE 2019 Cruise Log Team Leader Boat Names Starting Point Finishing Point No of Crew Rest Times PLEASE NOTE :- ALL SECTIONS CAN BE NAVIGATED IN EITHER DIRECTION UNLESS STATED If towing 'butties' only the motor needs to be pictured at the locations detailed below If you collect rubbish on your way round please finish via the Icknield port loop where there will be a skip at the C&RT depot for you to put the rubbish in. You are welcome to moor next to it to unload. If you would like to be entered into the trolley challenge for collecting the most rubbish, please photograph what you have collected so we can consider your entry. Please record your time either passing Old Turn on your way to Icknield Port loop, or when you reach there so we can award the correct finishing points. You will not be penalised any finish time or hand in time points by delivering your rubbish to the Icknield Port loop. Page 1 of 7 Bonus Time into Time out of Section Wyrley and Essington Canal (Including Daw End, Rushall and Arms) Miles Locks Factor section section Order Horsley Fields Junction to Birchills Junction 8 0 2 Birchills Junction to Pelsall Junction 4.5 0 2 Cannock Extension Canal UP to Grove Colliery Basins ONLY and return 2 0 2 Pelsall Junction to Catshill Junction 2.5 0 2 Catshill Junction to Anglesey Basin and return 5 0 2 Catshill Junction to Newton (Rushall) Junction 8 9 2 Questions. Points Answer Between Longwood Junction and Catshill Junction: To help get a Fix on your location a distance marker has been provided - how far to Boatmans Lane? (no need to get off the boat.) 3 There is only one Marina based pump out machine on the Daw End Branch, right next to an 1 1883 bridge - What is the bridge called? (You can get this from your boat) Between Catshill and Pelsall Junction : All the enhancements in Brownhills have given the town aspirations of "Royal" status.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Draught Spring 2018
    Spring 2018 Page 1 Channel Draught IN THIS ISSUE Local News Page 5 All the latest news from pubs in the Branch area Ramblings & Rumblings Page 14 ‘Stroller’s’ observations on his pub visits National News Page 17 Fullers buy Dark Star, National Pub of the Year, Brains to move and more Issue 75 Batham’s New Pub Page 18 Spring 2018 Could this start a return to more traditional pub formats White Cliffs Festival of Winter Ales 2018 Page 21 A review of this year’s Festival Channel Draught The Uncryptic Crossword Page 23 is published and Channel View Page 25 ©2018 by the Comment & Opinion Deal Dover Sandwich Deal Hop Farm 2018 Page 27 & District Branch After last year’s success, bigger and better in 2018. of the From Across the Water Page 28 Campaign for Real Ale Our ‘foreign correspondent’ makes a trip back to Kent The Potterers Cycle Club Page 30 www.camra-dds.org.uk Cycling and beer. Spring 2018 update Editorial Team To the Pub By Bus Page 32 A response to the article in our last issue Editor & Advertising Dodging Downpours on the BCN Page 37 Martin Atkins A look back at the Beery Boaters 1993 trip to the Birmingham canals Editorial Assistants Last Knockings Page 42 Trisha Wells ‘Old Wort’s’ Musings John Pitcher Design & Format BRANCH DIARY Events shown in blue are not organised by CAMRA Steve Bell Editorial Address Fri 1 - Sun 3 Jun BeerFest & Family Fun Day, Duke of Cumberland, Barham You can write to the Editor Sat 2 Jun Medway CAMRA Beer Festival, Star c/o Beaconsfield House Meadow Sports Club, Gillingham 12 Noon Beaconsfield Road Thur 7 Jun GBG Trail – long walk.
    [Show full text]
  • Hatherton Canal
    ITEM NO. 11.1 Report of: Head of Economic Prosperity Contact Officer: John Morgan Telephone No: 01543 464308 Portfolio Leader: Economic Development & Planning Key Decision: No Report Track: Cabinet: 14/03/19 CABINET 14 MARCH 2019 APPROVAL TO SPEND S106 MONIES: HATHERTON CANAL 1 Purpose of Report 1.1 To seek Cabinet approval to spend a S106 contribution towards the restoration of the Lichfield and Hatherton Canal. 2 Recommendation(s) 2.1 That Cabinet agree to transfer the uncommitted S106 funds to the Revenue budget, to allow the £10,000 to be transferred to the Lichfield and Hatherton Canals Restoration Trust (LHCRT), to allow them to commission a water supply study on the proposed restoration of the Hatherton Canal. 2.2 That the Head of Economic Prosperity be authorised to negotiate and enter into any agreement with the LHCRT, in consultation with the Economic Development and Planning Portfolio Leader. 3 Key Issues and Reasons for Recommendations Key Issues 3.1 The Council has supported the principle of restoration of the Hatherton Canal, as promoted by the Lichfield and Hatherton Canals Restoration Trust (LHCRT), over many years. 3.2 This Council originally safeguarded a route in the Local Plan for the proposed restoration of the Hatherton Canal, including a new alignment, in 1997 and since this time have continued to support the Trust’s long term plans, through the Development Plan process, in partnership with adjoining authorities including, South Staffordshire District, Walsall MBC and Lichfield District. ITEM NO. 11.2 3.3 From discussions with these partners and other key stakeholders, including Natural England and the Environment Agency, it became apparent that water supply for a restored canal was a key outstanding issue.
    [Show full text]
  • CB Clke 97 * VILE, NIGEL. Pub Walks Along the Kennet & Avon Canal
    RCHS BIBILIOGRAPHY PROJECT BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PERIODICAL LITERATURE OF INLAND WATERWAY TRANSPORT HISTORY Updated 27.10.18. Please send additions/corrections/comments to Grahame Boyes, [email protected]. This bibliography is arranged by class, as defined in the following table. It can be searched by calling up the FIND function (Control + F) and then entering the class or a keyword/phrase. Note that, to aid searching, some entries have also been given a subsidiary classification at the end. CLASSIFICATION SCHEME CA GENERAL HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION OF INLAND WATERWAY TRANSPORT IN THE BRITISH ISLES CB INLAND WATERWAY TRANSPORT AT PARTICULAR PERIODS CB1 Antiquity and early use of inland navigation up to c.1600 (arranged by region of the British Isles) CB1z Boats CB2 c.1600–1750 The age of river improvement schemes CB3 c.1750–1850 The Canal Age CB4 c.1850–1947 The period of decline CB5 1948– Nationalisation and after; the rebirth of canals as leisure amenities CC INLAND WATERWAY TRANSPORT IN PARTICULAR REGIONS OF THE BRITISH ISLES CC1a England—Southern England CC1b England—South West region CC1c England—South East region CC1cl London CC1d England—West Midlands region CC1e England—East Midlands region CC1f England—East Anglia CC1fq England—East Anglia: guides CC1g England—Northern England CC1h England—North West region CC1i England—Yorkshire and North Humberside region CC1j England—North region CC2 Scotland CC3 Wales CC4 Ireland CC4L Ireland: individual canals and navigations CC4Lbal Ballinamore & Ballyconnel Canal and Shannon–Erne Waterway CC4Lban Lower and Upper Bann Navigations and Lough Neagh CC4Lbar Barrow Navigation CC4Lboy Boyne Navigation CC4Lcor Corrib Navigation, including the Eglinton Canal and Cong Canal CC4Ldub Dublin & Kingstown Ship Canal (proposed) CC4Lern Erne Navigation CC4Lgra Grand Canal, including the County of Kildare Canal CC4Llag Lagan Navigation CC4Llif R.
    [Show full text]
  • Report-Grove Colliery Planning Application
    Application No: CH/19/048 ITEM NO. 6.165 Location: Grove Colliery, Lime Lane, Pelsall, Walsall, WS3 5AW Proposal: Change of Use of land to Gypsy Traveller Residential site for up to 7 caravans, of which no more than 3 would be static caravans. The construction of a day room block and utility block, creation of a new vehicular access and the laying of hard standing. ITEM NO. 6.166 Location Plan ITEM NO. 6.167 Proposed Site Plan ITEM NO. 6.168 Utility Block Plans and Elevations ITEM NO. 6.169 Contact Officer: Claire Faulkner Telephone No: 01543 464 337 PLANNING CONTROL COMMITTEE 15 JANUARY 2020 Application No: CH/19/048 Received: 06-Feb-2019 Location: Grove Colliery, Lime Lane, Pelsall Parish: Norton Canes Description: Change of Use of Land to Gypsy Traveller Residential site for up to 7 caravans, of which no more than 3 would be static caravans. The construction of a day room block and utility block, creation of a new vehicular access and the laying of hard standing. Application Type: Full Planning Application RECOMMENDATION: S106 then Approve with Conditions Reason(s) for Recommendation: In accordance with paragraph 38 of the National Planning Policy Framework the Local Planning Authority has worked with the applicant in a positive and proactive manner to approve the proposed development, which accords with the Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework. Conditions (and Reasons for Conditions): 1. The development to which this permission relates must be begun not later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date on which this permission is granted.
    [Show full text]
  • Template : Report Double Sided
    INSERT YOUR PICTURE(S) IN THIS CELL Southern Staffordshire Outline Water Cycle Study Final Report Stafford Borough, Lichfield District, Tamworth Borough, South Staffordshire District and Cannock Chase District Councils July 2010 Final Report 9V5955 CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 General Overview 1 1.2 Scope 1 1.3 Objectives of the Water Cycle Study 2 2 DATA COLLECTION AND METHODOLOGY 3 2.1 Overview 3 2.2 Data Collection and Guidance on the use of this Study 3 2.3 Housing Growth and Employment Trajectories 4 2.4 Flood Risk 5 2.5 Water Resources and Supply 6 2.6 Wastewater Collection and Treatment 7 2.7 Water Quality and Environmental Issues 7 2.8 Development Area Actions 8 2.9 Data Limitations 8 3 STRATEGIC ASSESSMENTS 9 3.1 Water Supply and Resources 9 3.1.1 Water Resources 9 3.1.2 Severn Trent Water Limited 12 3.1.3 South Staffordshire Water 20 3.1.4 Environment Agency 24 3.1.5 Non Residential Water Use 32 3.1.6 Canal Network 32 3.1.7 Conclusions 33 3.2 Wastewater Collection and Treatment 34 3.2.1 Introduction 34 3.2.2 Wastewater Infrastructure 35 3.2.3 STWL Generic WCS Response 36 3.2.4 Wastewater Treatment 38 3.3 Water Quality and Environmental Issues 44 3.3.1 Introduction 44 3.3.2 Directives 44 3.3.3 River Quality 45 3.3.4 Effect of Development upon Water Quality 46 3.3.5 Designated Sites 47 3.3.6 Effect of WwTWs on Water Quality 47 3.3.7 Effect of Agricultural Practices on Water Quality 47 3.4 Flood Risk 50 3.4.1 Introduction 50 3.4.2 Environment Agency Flood Maps 51 3.4.3 SFRAs 52 3.4.4 Regional Flood Risk Appraisal (RFRA) 53
    [Show full text]
  • Cannock Extension Canal SAC Conservation Objectives Supplementary Advice
    European Site Conservation Objectives: Supplementary advice on conserving and restoring site features Cannock Extension Canal Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Site Code: UK0012672 Photograph: Natural England. Date of Publication: 26 February 2018 Page 1 of 16 About this document This document provides Natural England’s supplementary advice about the European Site Conservation Objectives relating to Cannock Extension Canal SAC. This advice should therefore be read together with the SAC Conservation Objectives available here. You should use the Conservation Objectives, this Supplementary Advice and any case-specific advice given by Natural England, when developing, proposing or assessing an activity, plan or project that may affect this site. You may also find it helpful to refer to Natural England’s SSSI Impact Risk Zones dataset available here. This Supplementary Advice to the Conservation Objectives presents attributes which are ecological characteristics of the designated species and habitats within a site. The listed attributes are considered to be those that best describe the site’s ecological integrity and which, if safeguarded, will enable achievement of the Conservation Objectives. Each attribute has a target which is either quantified or qualitative depending on the available evidence. The target identifies as far as possible the desired state to be achieved for the attribute. The tables provided below bring together the findings of the best available scientific evidence relating to the site’s qualifying features, which may be updated or supplemented in further publications from Natural England and other sources. The local evidence used in preparing this supplementary advice has been cited. The references to the national evidence used are available on request.
    [Show full text]