DOCSLIB.ORG

PCF 114 Environmental Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PCF 114 Environmental Assessment Report PCF 114 Environmental Assessment Report SGAR5 – Development Phase Birmingham Box Phase 3 Managed Motorways M6 Junctions 5 – 8 PCF 114 Environmental Assessment Report Document Control Document Title PCF 114 Environmental Assessment Report Author Rosemary Armah Owner Rob Edwards Distribution Rob Edwards (MP Project Manager) Asad Khan (MP Assistant Project Manager) BB3 Managed Motorways Mailbox All present in the Reviewer List Document Status Final Issue for Approval Record of Issue Version Status Author Date Checked Date Authorised Date 1.0 Issue – For R. Armah 26/08/11 A. Dawes & 26/08/11 J McNulty 02/09/11 Consultation A. Thornhill 2.0 Issue – For R. Armah 27/10/11 A. Thornhill 27/10/11 J McNulty 15/11/11 Consultation 3.0 Final Issue R. Armah 27/10/11 A. Thornhill 17/11/11 M Heaton 17/11/11 Reviewer List Name Role Philip Barnett DfT Sponsor Matt Winter NetServ Technical Services - Regional Environmental Advisor Approvals Name Signature Title Date of Version Issue David Grant SRO Appendix A - M6BBPh3MM 114 Environmental Assessment Report 20111117.doc Birmingham Box Phase 3 Managed Motorway Page 2 of 221 PCF 114 Environmental Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Overview ........................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Need for an Environmental Assessment ...................................................... 10 1.3 Purpose of the Study ..................................................................................... 11 1.4 Structure of the Report .................................................................................. 11 2 THE PROPOSED SCHEME ............................................................................................... 15 2.1 Project Background ....................................................................................... 15 2.2 Need for the Scheme ...................................................................................... 15 2.3 Project Objectives .......................................................................................... 19 2.4 Overview of the Existing Environment ......................................................... 20 2.5 Project Description ......................................................................................... 23 2.6 Scheme Delivery and Implementation .......................................................... 35 3 ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................................ 37 3.1 The Key Challenges ....................................................................................... 37 3.2 Scheme Development .................................................................................... 37 4 THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS ........................................................ 39 4.1 Screening ........................................................................................................ 39 4.2 Scoping ........................................................................................................... 39 4.3 Environmental Consultation .......................................................................... 40 4.4 Delivery of the Environmental Assessment ................................................. 41 4.5 Reporting and Determination ........................................................................ 45 4.6 Public Consultation ........................................................................................ 45 5 SCOPE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ....................................................... 47 5.1 Scoping Process ............................................................................................ 47 5.2 Air Quality ....................................................................................................... 47 5.3 Cultural Heritage ............................................................................................. 49 5.4 Nature Conservation ...................................................................................... 50 5.5 Landscape Effects .......................................................................................... 51 5.6 Noise and Vibration ........................................................................................ 52 5.7 Effects on all Travellers ................................................................................. 54 5.8 Road Drainage and the Water Environment ................................................. 55 5.9 Disruption Due to Construction .................................................................... 55 Appendix A - M6BBPh3MM 114 Environmental Assessment Report 20111117.doc Birmingham Box Phase 3 Managed Motorway Page 3 of 221 PCF 114 Environmental Assessment Report 5.10 Proposed Assessment Methodology ............................................................ 56 5.11 Discounted Environmental Topic Areas ....................................................... 57 5.12 Cumulative Effects ......................................................................................... 58 6 AIR QUALITY ..................................................................................................................... 61 6.1 Focus of the Assessment .............................................................................. 61 6.2 Construction Phase ........................................................................................ 62 6.3 Operation Phase ............................................................................................. 66 6.4 Summary ......................................................................................................... 77 7 NATURE CONSERVATION ............................................................................................... 79 7.1 Focus of the Assessment .............................................................................. 79 7.2 Methodology ................................................................................................... 79 7.3 Existing Environment ..................................................................................... 82 7.4 Potential Environmental Effects .................................................................... 92 7.5 Mitigation ...................................................................................................... 101 7.6 Summary ....................................................................................................... 107 8 CULTURAL HERITAGE ................................................................................................... 109 8.1 Focus of the Assessment ............................................................................ 109 8.2 Methodology ................................................................................................. 109 8.3 Existing Environment ................................................................................... 111 8.4 Potential Environmental Effects .................................................................. 112 8.5 Mitigation ...................................................................................................... 113 8.6 Summary ....................................................................................................... 114 9 LANDSCAPE EFFECTS .................................................................................................. 115 9.1 Focus of the Assessment ............................................................................ 115 9.2 Methodology ................................................................................................. 115 9.3 Existing Environment ................................................................................... 117 9.4 Potential Environmental Effects .................................................................. 120 9.5 Mitigation ...................................................................................................... 129 9.6 Summary ....................................................................................................... 131 10 NOISE AND VIBRATION ................................................................................................. 133 10.1 Focus of the Assessment ............................................................................ 133 10.2 Construction Phase ...................................................................................... 133 10.3 Operation Phase ........................................................................................... 142 Appendix A - M6BBPh3MM 114 Environmental Assessment Report 20111117.doc Birmingham Box Phase 3 Managed Motorway Page 4 of 221 PCF 114 Environmental Assessment Report 10.4 Summary ....................................................................................................... 151 11 EFFECTS ON ALL TRAVELLERS .................................................................................. 153 11.1 Focus of the Assessment ............................................................................ 153 11.2 Methodology ................................................................................................. 153 11.3 Existing Environment ................................................................................... 154 11.4 Potential Environmental Effects .................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REVIEW LOCAL REPORT the WEST MIDLAND BIRD REPORT 1953 (48 Pages, 3 Half-Plates) and 1954 (64 Pages, 2 Half-Plates)
    REVIEW LOCAL REPORT THE WEST MIDLAND BIRD REPORT 1953 (48 pages, 3 half-plates) and 1954 (64 pages, 2 half-plates). Editor: J. Lord, 369, Chester Road, Boldrnere, Sutton Coldfield. Obtainable from J. Sears, 5, Acheson Road, Hall Green, Birmingham 25. Price 6s, each. THE Birmingham and West Midland Bird Club is one of the strongest in the country with membership approaching 500. Its Reports are substantial and well-produced, covering the counties of Warwick, Worcester and Stafford. Classified notes form the main part of the Report and follow the sequence and names used in the B.O.U. Check-List of 1952. Under each species notes referring to each county are listed separately, but not all of the commoner species occuring within the area are mentioned. No indication is given about the standards applied in accepting records, nor whether records are assessed by the editor alone or whether he has the help of a committee; clearly, in a club of this size, no one man can really know the capabilities of all members. In the case of some rarities supporting details are given, but there is no information on how several autumn Arctic Terns were identified. A new Staffordshire reservoir, Blithfield, contributed a number of interesting records in 1954. In addition to the classified' notes there are articles, in the 1953 report on "Breeding birds of the Tamworth district" and "Notes on seasonal population distribution of Curlew"; and in the 1954. report on "Birds of the Malvern district", "Migration of Swifts in north Warwickshire" (5 pages), "Buzzard Survey 1954", and "Birds of Cannock Reservoir" (7 pages).
    [Show full text]
  • STAFFORDSHIRE. (KELLY'a Erected in 1868, at a Cost of £X,6S7, Will Seat 150 Persons
    30 BARR (GB~:AT). STAFFORDSHIRE. (KELLY'A erected in 1868, at a cost of £x,6s7, will seat 150 persons. 1 and principal landowners. The soil is a stiff lo~m; subsoil, The charities are as follows :-( 1) one-third of the profits of gravel. The chief crops are wheat and roots. The area ia land granted upon trust in 1579 by Thomas Bromwich, of 4,960 acres; rateable value, £"1o,464; in 1891 the population Perry Barr, to the rector of Handsworth and four others, was 1,388. and now administered by nine trustees, including the l'arish Clerk, Charles Jelf. incumbents of Handsworth, Perry Barr and Great Barr PosT OFJ<"ICE.-Thomas Richards, sub-postmaster. Letters (these three being trustees ex-officio), under a scheme from Birmingham arrive at 6.45 a.m. ; dispatched at 10 sanctioned by the Charity Commissioners: the charity, a.m. & 7.25 p.m.; sundays at to a.m. The nearest which, at its present value, yields about £8o a year to Great money order & telegraph office is at Hamstead Barr, is to be applied according to the provisions of the above-mentioned scheme, for the benefit of the poor of the PILLAR LETTER BOXES :- three parishes; (2) the profits of about 66 acres of land Beacon inn, cleared at 8.30 a.m. & 6.40 p.m.; sundays, assigned for the repairs of the church; (3) an annual charge 8.3oa.m of £3 t6s. upon two farms for the education of five poor Queslett, 8.15a.m. &6.15p.m.; sundays, 10.15a.m children; (4) an annual charge of £2 12s.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF995, Job 6
    The Wildlife Trust for Birmingham and the Black Country _____________________________________________________________ The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background December 2005 Protecting Wildlife for the Future The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 The Wildlife Trust for Birmingham and the Black Country gratefully acknowledges support from English Nature, Dudley MBC, Sandwell MBC, Walsall MBC and Wolverhampton City Council. This Report was compiled by: Dr Ellen Pisolkar MSc IEEM The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 3. SITES 4 3.1 Introduction 4 3.2 Birmingham 3.2.1 Edgbaston Reservoir 5 3.2.2 Moseley Bog 11 3.2.3 Queslett Quarry 17 3.2.4 Spaghetti Junction 22 3.2.5 Swanshurst Park 26 3.3 Dudley 3.3.1 Castle Hill 30 3.3.2 Doulton’s Claypit/Saltwells Wood 34 3.3.3 Fens Pools 44 3.4 Sandwell 3.4.1 Darby’s Hill Rd and Darby’s Hill Quarry 50 3.4.2 Sandwell Valley 54 3.4.3 Sheepwash Urban Park 63 3.5 Walsall 3.5.1 Moorcroft Wood 71 3.5.2 Reedswood Park 76 3.5 3 Rough Wood 81 3.6 Wolverhampton 3.6.1 Northycote Farm 85 3.6.2 Smestow Valley LNR (Valley Park) 90 3.6.3 West Park 97 4. HABITATS 101 The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 4.1 Introduction 101 4.2 Heathland 103 4.3 Canals 105 4.4 Rivers and Streams 110 4.5 Waterbodies 115 4.6 Grassland 119 4.7 Woodland 123 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B1 SAD AAP CIL Recommended Modifications
    Appendix B - Proposed Modifications to SAD, AAP and CIL Cabinet 27th July 2016 Appendix B – Walsall SAD, AAP, CIL Proposed Pre-Submission Modifications Appendix Bi: Proposed Pre-Submission Modifications to Walsall’s SAD Proposed Modifications – text proposed to be deleted is shown as strike through, text proposed to be added is shown underlined. Main Modifications are shown in bold text. Bold red text indicates that at the time of writing further information or discussions are required from or with third parties. Proposed Modifications to Site Allocation Document (SAD) Reference Page Policy/ Section Modification Main Reason for Modification Potential Modification? Significant Effects - SA Required? General MODSAD1 Whole All chapters, and in Update proposed site allocations and other No To ensure that the No Plan particular policy designations to reflect the situation at – updating information in the SAD is as 4. Providing for the baseline date of 31.03.16. Delete only up-to-date as possible and Industrial Jobs and allocations where development has that there is a consistent Prosperity – Policies commenced or is under construction. Add baseline date for the IND1 – IND5 explanatory text in Introduction and individual information included in the 5. Strengthening Our chapters as appropriate. plan where possible. Local Centres – Policy SLC2 8. Sustainable Waste Update details of assets and constraints where Management – not mentioned under individual topics and Policies W2, W3, W4 sites below 9. Sustainable Use of Minerals – Policies 1 Appendix B - Proposed Modifications to SAD, AAP and CIL Cabinet 27th July 2016 M2 – M9 to 31.03.16 MODSAD2 Whole All chapters Ensure that references to policies that are No Standardisation No Plan carried forward from the UDP are – editing only throughout the Plan standardised as “UDP Saved Policy” MODSAD3 Whole All chapters Remove question marks re references to the No Standardisation No Plan BCCS and apply use of singular / plural – editing only throughout the Plan indicator(s)/ target(s) consistently.
    [Show full text]
  • (SAD) Core Document List for Submission
    Walsall SAD and Town Centre AAP: Core Document List for Submission Last Updated 25th September 2017 Walsall Sites Allocation Document (SAD) Core Document List for Submission Note: All documents are produced by Walsall Council unless the author is given. Ref Document Publication Date Examination Documents - Post Submission Documents EXAM1 Main Matter 3 – Housing Topic Paper July 2017 matter_3_housing_topic_paper.pdf EXAM2 Walsall Council SAD Examination Opening Statement September Walsall_Site_Allocation_Document_Opening_Statement_MS_05_09_2017.pdf 2017 EXAM3 Appeal Decision 2009 - Land to the west of Northgate, Aldridge, Walsall, WS9 8TL (Appeal Ref: APP/V4630/A/08/2091047) September Appeal_Decision_2009_-_Land_to_the_West_of_Northgate.pdf 2017 EXAM4 Note Submitted by Mr Griffiths including Planning Permission for Unit 10 Merchants Way September Note_submitted_by_Mr_Griffiths_including_Planning_Permission_for_Unit_10_Merchants_Way.pdf 2017 EXAM5 Main Matter 5 - Minerals Examination Note September Matter_5_Minerals_Note.pdf 2017 1 Walsall SAD and Town Centre AAP: Core Document List for Submission Last Updated 25th September 2017 Ref Document Publication Date EXAM6 Main Matter 6 - Waste Examination Note September Matter_6_Waste_Note.pdf 2017 EXAM7 HBF – Chiltern Delivery DPD – Initial Appraisal September HBF-Chiltern_Delivery_DPD_Initial_Appraisal.pdf 2017 EXAM8 HBF – Chiltern Delivery DPD – Inspector’s Suspension Letter September HBF-Chiltern_Delivery_DPD-Inspector_Suspension_Letter.pdf 2017 EXAM9 HBF – Forest of Dean Interim Findings September
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Week PDF SEND
    SEND – 17th May 24th May 2021 How to Use this Resource Over the course of the summer term, Birmingham SGO’s will be running 4 themed weeks to support your school and young people. We encourage you to use the resources and activities in the best way for your school – feel free to share with colleagues, parents and carers and young people! If your school has social media or internal school platforms, please feel free to share the Birmingham School Games message! www.sgochallenge.com #backtoschoolgames SEND Challenge Sensory Challenges Being in the outdoors is beneficial to young people and adults. By being physically active outside, you can achieve positive benefits such as: These challenges will focus on sight, smell, sound, touch pattern making. - Physical fitness - Emotional wellbeing Find an area outside that is safe to walk in. - Reduced anxiety and stress - Improved self-esteem Choose one of the challenges every day this - Improved sleep week. More challenges can be found at https://www.sense.org.uk/ Can you complete all 5 activities before the end of the week? You can also access yoga activities by clicking on the link https://www.sense.org.uk/umbraco/surface/download/download? filepath=/media/2577/yogaresource_singlepagesforweb.pdf www.sgochallenge.com #backtoschoolgames 11 44 3 2 5 www.sgochallenge.com #backtoschoolgames Birmingham Local Parks ALDRIDGE ROAD AND RECREATION OAKLANDS RECREATION GROUND GROUND OLD YARDLEY PARK Check out our list of Birmingham ASTON PARK PERRY PARK parks! They are ideal to walk, cycle or BOURNBROOK WALKWAY ROOKERY PARK BROOKVALE PARK SARA PARK jog in. BURBURY BRICKWORKS RIVER WALK SELLY OAK PARK COCKS MOORS WOODS SHELDON PARK EDGBASTON RESERVOIR SHIRE COUNTRY PARK Being in the outdoors has been shown FOX HOLLIES PARK SMALL HEATH PARK to improve physical and emotional HANDSWORTH PARK SPARKHILL PARK HENRY BARBER PARK STETCHFORD HALL PARK wellbeing.
    [Show full text]
  • Walsall Tour Notes 1993
    Walsall Tour Notes 1993 The West Midlands Group organised a walk that followed the Wyrley & Essington Canal from Walsall to Sneyd and used the newly re-opened passenger route from Bloxwich North to visit Churchbridge Railway interchange basin and the now demolished South Staffordshire Railway House near there, These notes reflect a time prior to the railway privatisation, when Regional Railways had charge of local services and Intercity operated the express trains in this region. Members from the East Midlands, West Midlands and North West groups attended. Lunch was arranged at the public house built beside the infilled locks at Sneyd. Tour leader ; Ray Shill. Index 2 – 18 Morning Walk 19 – 30 Afternoon Walk 31 – 34 Images of Walk Area 1 2 3 The walk begins at Walsall Station and the group assembles in the Saddler Centre. It is a modern brick and concrete structure, a product of 1970's architecture. Many will probably remember the old station, its wooden circular booking hall and frontage to Park Street. Some may even recall the transition, in 1978, when the old booking office was demolished to leave a gaping hole above the tracks below. In this period the station entrance was effected from Station Street across a temporary footbridge to an equally temporary booking office on the island platform. Then there was only one passenger service. Electric units, usually 304s, trundled from New Street to Walsall and back. Their diagram's might have involved exotic places such as Bletchley or Manchester, but for Walsall folk the train only went to Birmingham. If they wanted anywhere else it was simply change at Brummagen.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5: the Changing Geography of Bird Species Richness and Community 79 Composition; the Roles of Extirpations, Introductions and Colonisations
    The importance of Protected Areas for species undergoing distributional changes Jonathan Richard Hiley Doctor of Philosophy University of York Biology September 2017 Abstract The value of Protected Areas for wildlife will diminish if the species for which they were originally designated are pushed out of their boundaries by changing temperatures, or if they are infiltrated by invasive species that are harmful to native species. Here, I assess the performance of Protected Areas against this background of distributional change. I found that Protected Areas have facilitated the range expansions of the six wetland bird species that have recently colonised the UK, both as sites at which breeding first occurs and as locations where substantial populations can establish before spreading to unprotected land. In contrast, non-native species did not initially ‘invade’ Protected Areas, but subsequently colonised them as their populations grew. I complemented this analysis with a field research project in a Mexican Biosphere Reserve. Here, Strictly Protected Areas were resistant to non-native species (as in the UK), and important for species undergoing global population declines. However, partially-protected locations with habitat modification provided opportunities for both non-natives and native generalists. Consequently, modified areas were characterised by higher local-alpha diversity than relatively natural areas, although they contained relatively similar suites of species across different biogeographical zones. Thus, evaluating the impact of Protected Areas depended on the metric of biodiversity change considered, and on the level of protection. Similar patterns were revealed on a global scale (considering 118 countries). Range expansions (colonisations and introductions) have outpaced countrywide extirpations over the last two centuries, resulting in a c.4% average net increase in national breeding bird avifaunas, even though gamma- and beta-diversity have decreased.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Calvert Infrastructure Maintenance Depot
    HS2 London – West Midlands Design Refinement Consultation 8. Calvert Infrastructure Maintenance Depot Proposed change The Secretary of State is minded to provide an additional east-south ‘chord’ - a short, curved connecting rail line - to improve access from the proposed Calvert Infrastructure Maintenance Depot to HS2 tracks to the south. 8.1 Summary of January 2012 proposal 8.1.1 The January 2012 route included access to the HS2 mainline from the Calvert Infrastructure Maintenance Depot (IMD) via a link line to the north of the depot. 8.1.2 At this location HS2 crosses the Bicester-Bletchley line, which is currently a lightly used single track freight railway. The IMD is just to the north east of the crossing point. There is also an east-to-south railway chord serving the Calvert waste transfer facility and connecting the Bicester-Bletchley line to the line to Aylesbury which runs south from Calvert alongside the proposed HS2 track. 8.1.3 In January 2013, the Government announced its support for the East West Rail (EWR) project to upgrade and electrify these railway lines to provide services from Bedford to Oxford and beyond as well as onto the Aylesbury Link. The EWR services turning south to Aylesbury will require a new east-south chord, because the lines to Aylesbury will be shifted slightly eastwards to accommodate the new HS2 lines. 8.2 Issues identified with the January 2012 proposal 8.2.1 The developed January 2012 proposal envisages that trains from the IMD heading south would reverse northwards into sidings near Twyford before continuing south on HS2 tracks.
    [Show full text]
  • Sub-Regional Green Infrastructure Strategy
    WARWICKSHIRE, COVENTRY & SOLIHULL SUB-REGIONAL GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY [Consultation Draft, February 2013] Prepared by Warwickshire Museum and Natural Environment Acknowledgements: Coventry, Solihull and Warwickshire Association of Planning Officers (CSWAPO) would like to thank Natural England for the financial and officer support in preparing this document. CSWAPO would also like to acknowledge the assistance from Landuse Consultants and Richard Drakely (WCC Tourism Officer) in preparing the Accessibility elements, Mike Murray for preparing the Landscape elements and Dave Lowe (WCC Principal Ecologist) for preparing the Biodiversity elements. CSWAPO would also like to thank the support from the Local Authority Planning Officers and Local Authority discipline leads that formed the CSWAPO Project Officer Group, who steered the report over the 3 years of preparation. 1 Contents Vision ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Structure .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BCN Moorings Leaflet
    FACILITIES GENERAL INFORMATION WATER POINTS he Birmingham Canal Navigations (BCN) is a 100 mile network of narrow Sherborne Wharf (Birmingham) [0121 456 6163] T canals situated at the very heart of the Midlands waterway system. There is, Farmers Bridge Top Lock (Birmingham & Fazeley) Holliday Wharf (just south of Gas Street Basin) arguably, no other inland waterways complex in the world which provides such Tividale Aqueduct (Netherton Tunnel Branch) vivid, sometimes breathtaking, contrasts. It would be difficult to imagine a canal Tividale Aqueduct (Old Main Line) landscape containing more features of interest to such a wide variety of users. Wolverhampton Top Lock Wolverhampton Lock No.15 BW Sneyd Yard (Wyrley & Essington) Unfortunately, the BCN harbours a serious burden – its image. To the uninitiated the Anglesey Bridge Marina (Anglesey Branch) [01543 454994] Longwood Junction (by Boat Club) BCN is still perceived as grimy and unpleasant, but this is simply not true. Perry Barr Top Lock Admittedly, some parts do pass through industrialised areas – but remember – that is Walsall Top Lock the reason they were built in the first place! There are many others which remain Parkhead Junction (next to pump house) Aldridge Marina (Daw End Branch) [01922 53397] amazingly rural and completely unspoilt. Nowhere is this more apparent than the Hawne Basin (Dudley No.2) delightful areas of the Northern BCN, providing many miles of tranquil, trouble-free Malthouse Stables, Tipton (Old Main Line) cruising. Cuckoo Wharf (Aston Locks) Canal Transport Services (Cannock Extension) [01543 374370] Grove Colliery Basin (Cannock Extension) Fortunately British Waterways, in conjunction with local canal societies and Black Country Museum Coronation Gardens, Tipton (Old Main Line) councils, has done much in recent years to enhance the waterside, to improve NEW – Windmill End (Dudley No.2) [next to new visitor centre].
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Chairman’S Column in This Issue May Meeting ChairAS Colu
    May 2017 Southampton Canal Society Issue 532 Newsletter Chairman’s Column In this issue May Meeting Chairas Colu ........................ 1 AS USUAL, NO MAY MEETING AS THE HALL IS IN USE FOR ELECTIONS Cotswold Canals Funding ............... 1 At last! We hope that spring and the sunshine will arrive soon, time to plan our holidays and days Celebrating Fifty Years ................... 1 out. Waterways Events .................. 2 & 3 June Meeting: Celebrating Fifty Years April Meeting ................................. 3 O Thursda st Jue e hope ou ill e ale to ejo the ruise o the Joh Pikerto o the Mikron Theatre Tour 2017 ............ 4 Basigstoke Caal. For ore iforatio, see Aelreds ite elo. HNBC Easter Gathering ................. 4 As a result of the cruise there will be NO evening meeting at Chilworth. July Meeting Cotswold Canals Funding This ill e the “outhapto Caal “oiets Fiftieth Aual Geeral Meetig. The foral usiess COTSWOLD Canals Trust and Stroud will be followed by cheese, wine and a natter. District Council have welcomed the August Meeting news that the Canal & River Trust is backing the bid to reconnect Stroud There will be NO August meeting as the hall is closed for maintenance. to the national canal network. September Meeting Canal & River Trust trustees have On 7th September, Society member Gordon Osborn will be talking about family cruising in Ireland. pledged £625,000 to support the Thank you all for your support. restoration of the Cotswold Canal. The assistance will be spread over Alan Rose five years from 2018 if a bid this year Celebrating Fifty Years to the Heritage Lottery Fund is successful.
    [Show full text]